SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Artan Limani 
Managing Organizational Change 
10/31/2013 
SELF-ASSESSMENT ESSAY 
If I were to give myself an assessment as it pertains to ‘creating and managing 
organizational change’, I would initially say there are a lot a lessons I must assess. I tend to view 
this selft assessment through two different vantage points: 1) dealing with change done onto me 
and 2) how I would implore change in an organization. The different types of change ready 
elements one must be prepared to deal with in either setting, the key word being prepared. 
I would begin with acknowledging the type of person I am when it comes to change. 
According to W. Christopher Musselwhite and Robyn Ingram (1999) and their table of ‘change 
response-style’ I would categorize myself as a pragmatist. Just such as pragmatists I enjoy my 
routine, but I support change if and when it is viewed as necessary, beneficial, and addresses 
challenges. My behavior correlates very high with that of pragmatists such as my ability to be 
practical, agreeable, and flexible; I place more emphasis on the results and other components are 
secondary, however, the ends don’t always justify the means. 
Eric Hoffer (1963) stated that no one likes the new, the actually fear it. This is often the 
case for many people because, as eluded to in previous literature, it is the comfort zone they 
don’t want to get out from. I tend to like my comfort zone as well, but instead of viewing change 
as a burden I tend to view as an expansion of my comfort zone. 
John P. Kotter (1996) advocates that in order to an organization, committed to a change, 
to have sustained success there must be a relationship of leadership and management. Kotter 
went on to say that if you posses either or, you will only have achieved short-term success. He 
provides a matrix to display the relationship. If I were an HR professional looking to implore 
change I would naturally aim to attain both. I believe, through prior experience, that can create a 
compelling vision and provide the ‘how’ to accomplish it. 
I find is difficult to cope with questions of change if they are not present throughly. 
According to Paul Strebel (1996) the dimensions of personal compacts leave me pondering the 
effects (good / bad) of change. The question I revert to reside within the psychological 
dimension because often times at my organization I am not recognized for my input nor I am 
rewarded for the hard work I put in.
In dealing with resisters to change Paul R. Lawerence (1969) suggest that change occurs 
much smoother working within than when imposed by outsiders. Psychologists Robert Kegan 
and Lisa Lahey suggest there is a “competiting committment” with passive resisters to change 
and that they perhaps try to avoid further work. The way I would handle passive resister if I 
were implementing the change is revert to Jack Welch’s simple slogan – “up or out”. Meaning 
every employee must either move up in the ranks or if an employee doesn’t show the willingness 
or tenacity for the beneficial opportunity they will move out. 
According to Dr. John Kotter (2002) the most effective way to develop change within an 
organization is to combine the head and the heart approach. This done by formulating the ‘see & 
feel’ aspects equaling to the ‘change’ mechanism. This aligns with the earlier mentioned 
relationship with leadership and management – providing a compelling vision. I am very 
passionate when I speak about something I really believe in and I attempt to deeply illustrate my 
point so that you can envision my story. 
In “Leading Change” – John Kotter (1995) provides a chart of stages and actions needed 
to best succeed in the transformation of change – stating that ‘the status-quo is more dangerous 
than the unknown’. That resonates very much to the words U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry 
(2013) said about the crisis in Syria over chemicals weapons saying the price of inaction is far 
greater than price of action. I believe this very much and I convey this message often to my 
constituents, not only because the message identifies with two greater leaders, but because in my 
mind it is the truth of the matter. 
According to Linda W. Andrews (2003) all managers face stress triggers, but she 
provides a coping strategy chart in her “Avoiding HR Burnout”. I find myself partial to her 
strategies of: ‘strike a balance between people-oriented and business-oriented; and prioritize’. 
Indeed stress factors can come from all different directions but I resort to saying I must keep my 
focus. As she suggest private time is important as well; sometimes when it becomes 
overwhelming I must go away for a bit in order to comback. 
A number of statistical data analysis performed by Kreft & de Leeuw (1998) and Singer 
(1998) on the subject of committment to change and behaviorial outcomes of organizational 
change provide various findings. The data is fascinating, it suggests that the more resources an 
individual has at their disposal the better that individual can cope with loss of resources during 
organizational change. I concur with this analysis; I view it as the more duties / responsibilities 
you provide an individual with, the more hard work they put in, the greater their confidence will 
grow; giving them a higher self-value and being able to accepth change knowing that they can 
overcome the challenge. The data is presented below:
Figure 1 – Kreft & de Leeuw (1998); Singer (1998) – Academy of Management Journal 
Figure 2 – Kreft & de Leeuw (1998); Singer (1998) – Academy of Management Journal
Bibliography: 
Shin Jiseon, Taylor Susan M., Geo Myeong-Gu (2012). ‘Resource of Change: The Relationship 
of Organizational Inducements and Psychological Resilience to Employees’ Attitudes and 
Behaviors Towards Organizational Change’. Academy of Mangement Journal, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 
727 – 748. 
BusinessWire (2003). Peg Gamse Named Corporate Resources Director at RS Information Systems, A 
Berkshire Hathaway Company. Available from: 
<http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20031215005680/en/Peg-Gamse-Named-Corporate- 
Resources-Director-RS>. [Accessed 31 October2013]. 
Kotter P. John (2007). ‘Leading Change – Why Transformation Efforts Fail’. Harvard Business 
Review, pp. 1-10. 
-

More Related Content

PPT
14 work motivation
ODP
PPTX
Work Place Motivation
PDF
Challenging The Theories
ODP
Extrinsic motivation
PPTX
Motivation Theories
PPTX
Change Navigator: From Resistance to Resillience
PPTX
Mental Toughness
14 work motivation
Work Place Motivation
Challenging The Theories
Extrinsic motivation
Motivation Theories
Change Navigator: From Resistance to Resillience
Mental Toughness

What's hot (20)

ODP
Mindsets, control, and the self
ODP
Extrinsic motivation and goal-setting
PPTX
The secrets of facilitation
PPT
PPTX
Founder Communication Workshop - 03/24/15
PPTX
Motivation theory by amrendra singh
PDF
Laws Of Motivation
PDF
Developer Burnout: Yes, You Can Improve Your Team's Wellness
PPT
Class session 2 intro to groups and teams
PPTX
Self-Coaching and Leadership, March 2013
PPTX
Ed Batista, The Art of Self-Coaching @StanfordBiz, Class 3: ATTENTION
PPTX
Social Loafing
PPTX
Social loafing (1979)
DOCX
Motivation concepts summary
PPT
Group dynamics
PPTX
Startup Communication for Co-Founders, July 2014
PPTX
Team Effectiveness, August 2014
ODP
Individual emotions
PPTX
Ed Batista, Interpersonal Dynamics (aka Touchy Feely) @StanfordBiz, Class 6: ...
PPTX
High-Performance Communication, June 2013
Mindsets, control, and the self
Extrinsic motivation and goal-setting
The secrets of facilitation
Founder Communication Workshop - 03/24/15
Motivation theory by amrendra singh
Laws Of Motivation
Developer Burnout: Yes, You Can Improve Your Team's Wellness
Class session 2 intro to groups and teams
Self-Coaching and Leadership, March 2013
Ed Batista, The Art of Self-Coaching @StanfordBiz, Class 3: ATTENTION
Social Loafing
Social loafing (1979)
Motivation concepts summary
Group dynamics
Startup Communication for Co-Founders, July 2014
Team Effectiveness, August 2014
Individual emotions
Ed Batista, Interpersonal Dynamics (aka Touchy Feely) @StanfordBiz, Class 6: ...
High-Performance Communication, June 2013
Ad

Similar to Self-ast (20)

DOCX
Organizational Change Management PaperContentsYour paper.docx
DOCX
AbstractTranslate AbstractUndo Translation TranslateUndo Transla.docx
PPTX
The Stress of Organizational Change - Change Management
DOCX
UNDERSTANDING AND COPING WITH CHANGEUNDERSTANDING AND COPING WI.docx
PDF
Influence of organizational_culture
PPT
Change management
PPT
Adapting to change generic format - 031510
PPT
Unit 5 pom
PDF
Chapter 4 leading change and innovation
DOCX
assignment change management assignment.docx
DOCX
Leading the Change ProcessIntroductionAny experienced business.docx
DOCX
Change management
PPTX
change-140820234815-phpapp02.pptx
DOCX
ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVESECON200W - CRN 11297                       .docx
PPSX
Understanding organizational change toastmasters conference 2016
PPSX
Understanding organizational change toastmasters conference 2016
PDF
Leading Change
PDF
Leading Change
PPT
Wcm Cm Lecture 1 & 2 2
PDF
Managing Change Essay
Organizational Change Management PaperContentsYour paper.docx
AbstractTranslate AbstractUndo Translation TranslateUndo Transla.docx
The Stress of Organizational Change - Change Management
UNDERSTANDING AND COPING WITH CHANGEUNDERSTANDING AND COPING WI.docx
Influence of organizational_culture
Change management
Adapting to change generic format - 031510
Unit 5 pom
Chapter 4 leading change and innovation
assignment change management assignment.docx
Leading the Change ProcessIntroductionAny experienced business.docx
Change management
change-140820234815-phpapp02.pptx
ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVESECON200W - CRN 11297                       .docx
Understanding organizational change toastmasters conference 2016
Understanding organizational change toastmasters conference 2016
Leading Change
Leading Change
Wcm Cm Lecture 1 & 2 2
Managing Change Essay
Ad

Self-ast

  • 1. Artan Limani Managing Organizational Change 10/31/2013 SELF-ASSESSMENT ESSAY If I were to give myself an assessment as it pertains to ‘creating and managing organizational change’, I would initially say there are a lot a lessons I must assess. I tend to view this selft assessment through two different vantage points: 1) dealing with change done onto me and 2) how I would implore change in an organization. The different types of change ready elements one must be prepared to deal with in either setting, the key word being prepared. I would begin with acknowledging the type of person I am when it comes to change. According to W. Christopher Musselwhite and Robyn Ingram (1999) and their table of ‘change response-style’ I would categorize myself as a pragmatist. Just such as pragmatists I enjoy my routine, but I support change if and when it is viewed as necessary, beneficial, and addresses challenges. My behavior correlates very high with that of pragmatists such as my ability to be practical, agreeable, and flexible; I place more emphasis on the results and other components are secondary, however, the ends don’t always justify the means. Eric Hoffer (1963) stated that no one likes the new, the actually fear it. This is often the case for many people because, as eluded to in previous literature, it is the comfort zone they don’t want to get out from. I tend to like my comfort zone as well, but instead of viewing change as a burden I tend to view as an expansion of my comfort zone. John P. Kotter (1996) advocates that in order to an organization, committed to a change, to have sustained success there must be a relationship of leadership and management. Kotter went on to say that if you posses either or, you will only have achieved short-term success. He provides a matrix to display the relationship. If I were an HR professional looking to implore change I would naturally aim to attain both. I believe, through prior experience, that can create a compelling vision and provide the ‘how’ to accomplish it. I find is difficult to cope with questions of change if they are not present throughly. According to Paul Strebel (1996) the dimensions of personal compacts leave me pondering the effects (good / bad) of change. The question I revert to reside within the psychological dimension because often times at my organization I am not recognized for my input nor I am rewarded for the hard work I put in.
  • 2. In dealing with resisters to change Paul R. Lawerence (1969) suggest that change occurs much smoother working within than when imposed by outsiders. Psychologists Robert Kegan and Lisa Lahey suggest there is a “competiting committment” with passive resisters to change and that they perhaps try to avoid further work. The way I would handle passive resister if I were implementing the change is revert to Jack Welch’s simple slogan – “up or out”. Meaning every employee must either move up in the ranks or if an employee doesn’t show the willingness or tenacity for the beneficial opportunity they will move out. According to Dr. John Kotter (2002) the most effective way to develop change within an organization is to combine the head and the heart approach. This done by formulating the ‘see & feel’ aspects equaling to the ‘change’ mechanism. This aligns with the earlier mentioned relationship with leadership and management – providing a compelling vision. I am very passionate when I speak about something I really believe in and I attempt to deeply illustrate my point so that you can envision my story. In “Leading Change” – John Kotter (1995) provides a chart of stages and actions needed to best succeed in the transformation of change – stating that ‘the status-quo is more dangerous than the unknown’. That resonates very much to the words U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (2013) said about the crisis in Syria over chemicals weapons saying the price of inaction is far greater than price of action. I believe this very much and I convey this message often to my constituents, not only because the message identifies with two greater leaders, but because in my mind it is the truth of the matter. According to Linda W. Andrews (2003) all managers face stress triggers, but she provides a coping strategy chart in her “Avoiding HR Burnout”. I find myself partial to her strategies of: ‘strike a balance between people-oriented and business-oriented; and prioritize’. Indeed stress factors can come from all different directions but I resort to saying I must keep my focus. As she suggest private time is important as well; sometimes when it becomes overwhelming I must go away for a bit in order to comback. A number of statistical data analysis performed by Kreft & de Leeuw (1998) and Singer (1998) on the subject of committment to change and behaviorial outcomes of organizational change provide various findings. The data is fascinating, it suggests that the more resources an individual has at their disposal the better that individual can cope with loss of resources during organizational change. I concur with this analysis; I view it as the more duties / responsibilities you provide an individual with, the more hard work they put in, the greater their confidence will grow; giving them a higher self-value and being able to accepth change knowing that they can overcome the challenge. The data is presented below:
  • 3. Figure 1 – Kreft & de Leeuw (1998); Singer (1998) – Academy of Management Journal Figure 2 – Kreft & de Leeuw (1998); Singer (1998) – Academy of Management Journal
  • 4. Bibliography: Shin Jiseon, Taylor Susan M., Geo Myeong-Gu (2012). ‘Resource of Change: The Relationship of Organizational Inducements and Psychological Resilience to Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviors Towards Organizational Change’. Academy of Mangement Journal, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 727 – 748. BusinessWire (2003). Peg Gamse Named Corporate Resources Director at RS Information Systems, A Berkshire Hathaway Company. Available from: <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20031215005680/en/Peg-Gamse-Named-Corporate- Resources-Director-RS>. [Accessed 31 October2013]. Kotter P. John (2007). ‘Leading Change – Why Transformation Efforts Fail’. Harvard Business Review, pp. 1-10. -