Sense of Community Index 2(SCI-2)
5 likes5,445 views
The document summarizes the development and use of the Sense of Community Index (SCI), a quantitative measure of sense of community. It describes revisions made to the SCI to address reliability issues and create an improved version, the SCI-2. Testing of the SCI-2 with 1,800 people found it to be highly reliable with strong internal reliability for the overall scale and its subscales. Instructions are provided for administering and scoring the 24-item SCI-2.
![Sense of Community Index
Community Science 1
SENSE OF COMMUNITY INDEX II
The following questions about community refer to: [insert community name].
How important is it to you to feel a sense of community with other community members?
How well do each of the following statements represent how you feel about this
community?
Not at All Somewhat Mostly Completely
1. I get important needs of mine met because I am part of
this community.
2. Community members and I value the same things.
3. This community has been successful in getting the needs
of its members met.
4. Being a member of this community makes me feel good.
5. When I have a problem, I can talk about it with members
of this community.
6. People in this community have similar needs, priorities,
and goals.
7. I can trust people in this community.
1 2 3 4 5 6
Prefer Not to
be Part of This
Community
Not Important
at All
Not Very
Important
Somewhat
Important
Important Very Important](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/senseofcommunityindex-2sci-2-170930133046/85/Sense-of-Community-Index-2-SCI-2-3-320.jpg)
Sense of Community Index 2(SCI-2)
- 1. Sense of Community Index 2 (SCI-2): © Background, Instrument, and Scoring Instructions Community Science 438 N. Frederick Avenue, Suite 315 Gaithersburg, MD 20877 301-519-0722 voice 301-519-0724 fax www.communityscience.com www.senseofcommunity.com
- 2. Sense of Community Index Community Science 1 The Sense of Community Index (SCI) is the most frequently used quantitative measure of sense of community in the social sciences. It has been used in numerous studies covering different cultures in North and South America, Asia, Middle East, as well as many contexts (e.g. urban, suburban, rural, tribal, workplaces, schools, universities, recreational clubs, internet communities, etc.). The SCI is based on a theory of sense of community presented by McMillan and Chavis (1986) that stated that a sense of community was a perception with four elements: membership, influence, meeting needs, and a shared emotional connection. Results of prior studies have demonstrated that the SCI has been a strong predicator of behaviors (such as participation) and a valid measurement instrument. Nonetheless the SCI has also been subject to criticisms and limitations. The reliability of the overall 12 item scale has be adequate, however it consisted of four subscales whose reliability were inconsistent and generally very low. The SCI had a true-false response set that limited variability and concerned critics. Despite its use with different cultural groups, there were concerns about the adequacy of the SCI as a cross cultural measure. A study of immigrant integration in a western US state, provided the research team the opportunity to revise the SCI in order to address previous concerns. The research team created a 24 item Sense of Community Index version 2 (SCI-2). Unlike the earlier version, it was able to cover all the attributes of a sense of community described in the original theory. A Likert like scale was developed instead of the True-False format. The original draft was piloted with 36 culturally person in seven different setting s from Maryland to Hawaii. Strong reliability was found, but there were several suggestions for improvement which were incorporated (i.e., rewording of the statement to increase clarity) The SCI-2 was revised and used within a larger survey of 1800 people. The analysis of the SCI-2 showed that it is a very reliable measure (coefficient alpha= .94). The subscales also proved to be reliable with coefficient alpha scores of .79 to .86. Community Science is pleased to share this material with other organizations and individuals free of charge. No changes may be made to the SCI-2, for use in either print or electronic form, without the permission of David Chavis, Ph.D., Community Science, 438 N. Frederick Ave., Suite 315, Gaithersburg, MD 20877; 301-519-0722 (office) or 301-519-0724 (fax) or email dchavis@communityscience.com. Citation for this instrument: Chavis, D.M., Lee, K.S., & Acosta J.D. (2008). The Sense of Community (SCI) Revised: The Reliability and Validity of the SCI-2. Paper presented at the 2nd International Community Psychology Conference, Lisboa, Portugal.
- 3. Sense of Community Index Community Science 1 SENSE OF COMMUNITY INDEX II The following questions about community refer to: [insert community name]. How important is it to you to feel a sense of community with other community members? How well do each of the following statements represent how you feel about this community? Not at All Somewhat Mostly Completely 1. I get important needs of mine met because I am part of this community. 2. Community members and I value the same things. 3. This community has been successful in getting the needs of its members met. 4. Being a member of this community makes me feel good. 5. When I have a problem, I can talk about it with members of this community. 6. People in this community have similar needs, priorities, and goals. 7. I can trust people in this community. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prefer Not to be Part of This Community Not Important at All Not Very Important Somewhat Important Important Very Important
- 4. Sense of Community Index Community Science 2 Not at All Somewhat Mostly Completely 8. I can recognize most of the members of this community. 9. Most community members know me. 10. This community has symbols and expressions of membership such as clothes, signs, art, architecture, logos, landmarks, and flags that people can recognize. 11. I put a lot of time and effort into being part of this community. 12. Being a member of this community is a part of my identity. 13. Fitting into this community is important to me. 14. This community can influence other communities. 15. I care about what other community members think of me. 16. I have influence over what this community is like. 17. If there is a problem in this community, members can get it solved. 18. This community has good leaders. 19. It is very important to me to be a part of this community. 20. I am with other community members a lot and enjoy being with them. 21. I expect to be a part of this community for a long time. 22. Members of this community have shared important events together, such as holidays, celebrations, or disasters. 23. I feel hopeful about the future of this community. 24. Members of this community care about each other.
- 5. Sense of Community Index Community Science 3 Instructions for Scoring the Revised Sense of Community Index 1. Identifying the Community Referent The attached scale was developed to be used in many different types of communities. Be sure to specify the type of community the scale is referring to before administering the scale. Do not use “your community” as the referent. 2. Interpreting the Initial Question The initial question “How important is it to you to feel a sense of community with other community members?” is a validating question that can be used to help you interpret the results. We have found that total sense of community is correlated with this question – but keep in mind this may not be true in every community. 3. Scoring the Scale For the 24 questions that comprise the revised Sense of Community Index participants: Not at All = 0, Somewhat = 1, Mostly = 2, Completely = 3 Total Sense of Community Index = Sum of Q1 to Q24 Subscales Reinforcement of Needs = Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4 + Q5 + Q6 Membership = Q7 + Q8 + Q9 + Q10 + Q11 + Q12 Influence = Q13 + Q14 + Q15 + Q16 + Q17 + Q18 Shared Emotional Connection = Q19 + Q20 + Q21 + Q22 + Q23 + Q24