Sergio Final
1) Fukushima Daiichi. IAEA/PRIS. 2013
1) The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Report by General Director.. IAEA, 2013
1) The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Report by General Director. IAEA, 2013
2) Technical Volume 1/5 description and Context of the Accident. IAEA, 2013
Unit Power (MWe) Status
1 460 Operating
2 784 Operating
3 784 Operating
4 784 Outage
5 784 Outage
6 1,100 Outage
1) Public domain image by U.S. NRC
ECCS: Emergency Core Cooling System
ESBWR: Economic Simplified BWR
BWR
Version
First Commercial
Operation Date
Representative Plant
Characteristics
BWR/1 1960
Dresden 1
Initial commercial size BWR
Dual Cycle
BWR/2 1969
Oyster Creek
Plants purchased solely on economics
Large direct cycle
Forced circulation
Variable speed pumps for circulation flow control
BWR/3 1971
Dresden 2
Internal jet pumps application
Improved ECCS: spray and flood capability
BWR/4 1972
Vermont Yankee
Increase power density
1) Boiling Water Reactor Simulator with Passive Sate Systems. User Manual, IAEA. October 2009
BWR
Version
First Commercial
Operation Date
Representative Plant
Characteristics
BWR/5 1977
Tokai 2
Improved ECCS
Valve flow control
BWR/6 1978
Cofrentes
Compacts control room
Solid-state nuclear system protection system
ABWR 1996
Kashiwazaki-Kariva 6
Reactor internal pumps
Fine-motion control rod drives
Advanced control room, digital and fiber optic
technology
Improved ECCS: high/low pressure flooders
ESBWR Under Review
Natural circulation
Passive ECCS
1) Boiling Water Reactor Simulator with Passive Sate Systems. User Manual, IAEA. October 2009
ECCS: Emergency Core Cooling System
ESBWR: Economic Simplified BWR
1) Fukushima Dai-ichi Units 1-6 U.S.NRC May, 2012
1) Fukushima Dai-ichi Units 1-6 U.S.NRC May, 2012
1) U.S. NRC, General Electric, Sandia Laboratories
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i92VHLRUGeE
1) Battle to stabilize the Fukushima Daiichi
reactors. Joseph Miller. March 30, 2011
2)http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fuku
shima-np/outline_f1/index-e.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LIu7bhRDXE
1) ABWR Seminar-Reactor, Core & Neutronics LE Fennern April 13, 2007
1) Dynamic Behavior of BWR
Massachusetts Institute of Tec
hnology Department of Nucle
ar Science and Engineering. Cla
ss of Engineering of Nuclear S
ystems
1) Dynamic Behavior of BWR Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering. Class of Engineering of N
uclear Systems
1) BWR Description. Jacopo Buongiorno. CANES. 2) ABWR Seminar-Reactor, Core & Neutronics LE Fennern, 2007
1) BWR/6 General Description of a Boiling Water Reactor. GE Nuclear Energy
1) The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Report by General Director.. IAEA, 2013
1) The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Report by General Director.. IAEA, 2013
1) The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Report by General Director.. IAEA, 2013
1) The Fukushima Daiichi Accident Report by General Director.. IAEA, 2013
1) Coastal Engineering Committee Of Japan
Society Of Civil Engineers, The 2011 off the
Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake Informa
tion (30 March 2012), Coastal Engineering C
ommittee, JSCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vggzl9OngaM
1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBNFvZ6Vr2U
Estimated conditions of the RPVs and PCVs of Units 1–3 February 2014
RPV: Reactor Pressure Vessel
PCV: Primary Containment Vessel
Sergio Final
Unit Amount, Kg
1 890
2 460
3 810
1) Yanez J, et al., An analysis of the hydrogen explosion in the Fukushima
-Daiichi accident,International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2015), http:/
/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.154
2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBNFvZ6Vr2U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBNFvZ6Vr2U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YarjI1FwsuA
http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/9522/is-fukushima-reactor-no-4-on-the-verge-of-
catastrophic-failure-that-will-destro
A visual inspection by remote controlled camera has shown no significant
damage to the used fuel pond of Fukushima Daiichi unit 4
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_No_significant_damage_to_fuel_at_Unit
_4_3004111.html
The Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Crisis Management, 2012
http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/mitigation-strategies.html
http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/mitigation-strategies.html
http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/mitigation-strategies.html
http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/mitigation-strategies.html
Sergio Final
http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/mitigation-strategies.html

More Related Content

PPTX
Gaming Sites Getting Mobile Friendly in a Post Mobilegeddon World -- EiG Berl...
PPTX
History of English Language
PDF
Shamaimul Anbar
DOCX
The BEAT Interview Monique Richards
DOCX
Privilege walk
PPT
Group11 twitter final_project
DOCX
IncisiveCv
PDF
500’s Demo Day Batch 16 >> Many Chat
Gaming Sites Getting Mobile Friendly in a Post Mobilegeddon World -- EiG Berl...
History of English Language
Shamaimul Anbar
The BEAT Interview Monique Richards
Privilege walk
Group11 twitter final_project
IncisiveCv
500’s Demo Day Batch 16 >> Many Chat

Viewers also liked (7)

PPTX
201611キロク乃キオク
PDF
Summit 2016 wrap up hands out
PDF
Livre blanc pour le tourisme en france - Alliance 46-2
PDF
Quiénes somos
PPTX
The history of the english language
PPTX
Food product development
PPT
Baked products from wheat
201611キロク乃キオク
Summit 2016 wrap up hands out
Livre blanc pour le tourisme en france - Alliance 46-2
Quiénes somos
The history of the english language
Food product development
Baked products from wheat
Ad

Similar to Sergio Final (20)

PDF
6. 2 BWR - fukushima1_technical_perspective_lbl_eedt_04052011-1.pdf
PPT
A Post-Fukushima Look at Assessing Flood Hazards
PDF
Advanced energy technology for sustainable development. Part 5
PPTX
An analysis of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants
PPTX
FinalPresentation.pptx
PDF
Fukushima daichi disaster
PDF
Well logging analysis: methods and interpretation
PDF
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident April19 2011
PDF
OMAE2014 - 23661 Experimental Assessment of The Behaviour Of A Pipe Vibration...
PDF
Strengthening National Regulatory Capabilities InCountries Embarking On New C...
PPTX
OFFSHORE FLOATING NUCLEAR POWERPLANT
PPTX
Fukushima Daiichi Byu Presentation
PDF
Solar Based Autonomous Ship for Cleaning Garbage & Surveillance
PDF
Dynamic Analysis of Power Cable in Floating Offshore Wind Turbine
PDF
Time-History Analysis on Seismic Stability of Nuclear Island Bedrock with wea...
PDF
The stable atmospheric boundary layer a challenge for wind turbine operatio...
PDF
Japanese nuclearsituation fa_qs_04_05_2011
PDF
Study of pressurized water reactor design models
PPT
Nuclear enery source_generation_origin_fuel
PDF
Geophysics Labs
6. 2 BWR - fukushima1_technical_perspective_lbl_eedt_04052011-1.pdf
A Post-Fukushima Look at Assessing Flood Hazards
Advanced energy technology for sustainable development. Part 5
An analysis of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants
FinalPresentation.pptx
Fukushima daichi disaster
Well logging analysis: methods and interpretation
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident April19 2011
OMAE2014 - 23661 Experimental Assessment of The Behaviour Of A Pipe Vibration...
Strengthening National Regulatory Capabilities InCountries Embarking On New C...
OFFSHORE FLOATING NUCLEAR POWERPLANT
Fukushima Daiichi Byu Presentation
Solar Based Autonomous Ship for Cleaning Garbage & Surveillance
Dynamic Analysis of Power Cable in Floating Offshore Wind Turbine
Time-History Analysis on Seismic Stability of Nuclear Island Bedrock with wea...
The stable atmospheric boundary layer a challenge for wind turbine operatio...
Japanese nuclearsituation fa_qs_04_05_2011
Study of pressurized water reactor design models
Nuclear enery source_generation_origin_fuel
Geophysics Labs
Ad

Sergio Final

Editor's Notes

  • #4: To prevent the nuclear fuel from overheating, this heat had to be removed by cooling systems that were mainly run or controlled by electrical power* *The Fukushima Daiichi Accident REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL of the International Atomic Energy Agency 2013
  • #5: To prevent the nuclear fuel from overheating, this heat had to be removed by cooling systems that were mainly run or controlled by electrical power* *The Fukushima Daiichi Accident REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL of the International Atomic Energy Agency 2013
  • #6: In BWRs, due to the necessity of a steam dryer above the core, this design requires insertion of the control rods from beneath. 
  • #7: The Nuclear System Protection System is a four channel electrical alarm and actuating system that monitors the operation of the reactor, which, upon sensing an abnormal condition, initiates action to prevent an unsafe or potentially unsafe condition. The system integrates the following functions : Reactor Trip: Nuclear System Isolation Engineered Safety Feature Actuation The NSPS uses solid state electronic technology from sensor output to actuation device inputs. Nuclear Engineering Handbook  edited by Kenneth D. Kok http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-0046.html Code: 10CFR50.46
  • #9: The Vallecitos boiling water reactor (VBWR) was the first privately owned and operated nuclear power plant to deliver significant quantities of electricity to a public utility grid. During the period October 1957 to December 1963, it delivered approximately 40,000 megawatt-hours of electricity. This reactor -- a light-water moderated and cooled, enriched uranium reactor using stainless steel-clad, plate-type fuel -- was a pilot plant and test bed for fuel, core components, controls, and personnel training for the Dresden project, a Commonwealth Edison plant built in Illinois five years later. The plant was a collaborative effort of the General Electric Company and Pacific Gas and Electric Company with Bechtel serving as engineering contractor. Samuel Untermyer, the GE engineer responsible for the initial design of the VBWR, had performed much of the conceptual research at Argonne National Laboratory while conducting heat transfer and nuclear physics experiments, including the BORAX (boiling reactor experiment) tests. https://www.asme.org/about-asme/who-we-are/engineering-history/landmarks/128-vallecitos-boiling-water-reactor The VBWR was shutdown in 1963 and NRC issued a possession only license in 1965. The license was renewed in 1973 and the license has remained effective under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.51(b). The facility has been maintained in SAFSTOR condition. The licensee plans to maintain the facility in SAFSTOR until ongoing nuclear activities are terminated and the entire site can be decommissioned. GE has a self-guarantee instrument. The spent fuel has been removed from the site. http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/decommissioning/power-reactor/vallecitos-boiling-water-reactor-vbwr-.html
  • #12: In BWRs, the heat is generated in the core that is composed of the fuel assemblies, which are the fuel pins bundled in square arrays and enclosed in a zirconium alloy fuel channel box72, and the control rods, which are cross-shaped arrangement of blades containing boron carbide (B4C) neutron poison. The fuel pins consist of low enrichment uranium oxide or mixed (uranium and plutonium) oxide (MOX) fuel pellets enclosed and sealed in zirconium alloy cladding tubes. The BWR fuel design and reactor core arrangements evolved over the years. The reactor cores in the Fukushima Daiichi NPP units at the time of the accident had some differences in their arrangements as shown in Table 1.2–8. Section 1.4 provides further details of the fuel composition. Pag 66 Volume 1
  • #13: ABWR Seminar-Reactor, Core & Neutronics LE Fennern April 13, 2007
  • #14: Dynamic Behavior of BWR Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering Engineering of Nuclear Systems
  • #15: When the flow increases, density increases
  • #16: The Control rod design, susing boron carbide B4C compacted in stainless tubes. Control rods are used for power distribution shaping and for shim control of long term reactivity changes which occur as result of fuel irradiation
  • #17: BWR/6 General Description of a Boiling Water Reactor. GE Nuclear Energy
  • #18: In the Unit 1 design, there were two separate and redundant isolation condenser loops. In these closed loops, the primary side of the isolation condenser received steam generated in the reactor and condensed it by cooling inside the heat exchanger tubes that were submerged in colder water tanks (isolation condenser pools) located outside the primary containment vessel. Condensed steam was then sent as cold water back to the reactor by gravity (see the diagram below). Without mixing with the radioactive primary side water, the secondary side water in the isolation condenser pools boiled, and the evaporated steam was vented to the atmosphere, which served as the heat sink. The secondary side water volume of the isolation condenser (both trains together) was sufficient for eight hours of cooling before requiring replenishment from a dedicated water source.
  • #19: Reactor core isolation cooling. In the design of Units 2–6, there were open cycle cooling systems that needed a source for adding water to the reactor system. In the reactor core isolation cooling systems, the steam from the reactor drove a small turbine which, in turn, ran a pump that injected water into the reactor at high pressure. The steam that ran the turbine was discharged and accumulated in the suppression pool section of the primary containment vessel, which served as the heat sink for absorbing waste heat. The water lost from the reactor was replenished by taking fresh water from the condensate storage tank (see the diagram below). When the tank emptied or the suppression pool became full, the water that accumulated in the suppression pool could be used, making the system essentially a closed loop cycle. The reactor core isolation cooling was designed to operate for at least four hours.
  • #20: In Unit 1, as the reactor pressure increased, both loops of the isolation condenser system started automatically and continued to cool the reactor. The operation of both isolation condenser loops lowered the reactor pressure and temperature so rapidly that the operators manually stopped them, in accordance with procedures, in order to prevent thermal stress on the reactor pressure vessel. Afterwards, only one of the loops was used by the operators to control the cooling rate in a range prescribed by the procedures.  In Units 2 and 3, the increase in reactor pressure automatically activated safety relief valves, which were designed to protect the reactor from over pressurization by releasing steam from the reactor vessel to the suppression pool section of the primary containment vessel. This resulted in a decrease in the reactor water levels. The operators manually activated the reactor core isolation cooling system in accordance with procedures. In Unit 4, the equipment for cooling and refilling of spent fuel pool water stopped working as a result of the loss of off-site power. The Unit 4 spent fuel pool, containing more than 1300 spent fuel assemblies, had the largest amount of decay heat to be removed among all the spent fuel pools of the units.  In Unit 5, the reactor pressure, which was being kept elevated by the use of a pump for pressure testing purposes at the time of the earthquake, initially dropped when the pump stopped as a result of the loss of off-site power. The pressure started to rise due to decay heat, but unlike in Units 2 and 3, it remained well below the levels to activate the safety relief valves.  In Unit 6, the reactor was near
  • #22: However, about 10 minutes after the first wave, the second and largest wave, with a runup height of 14–15 m,
  • #23: As the core degradation proceeds, leading eventually to melting of the core material, the fission products initially trapped within the nuclear fuel become volatile and released from the core material. The time and amount of release of the different fission product elements depends on their respective volatilization temperatures, as follows:  Highly volatility elements like the noble gases, i.e. xenon (Xe), krypton (Kr), caesium (Cs), iodine (I), or tellurium (Te) and relevant chemical compounds of these elements, are released completely from the core in the early phase of core degeneration, when the core is still inside the RPV.  Medium volatility elements like strontium (Sr) and barium (Ba) are released from the core during the in-vessel phase as well as during the ex-vessel phase. These medium volatile fission products dominate the release during the accident phase after RPV failure.  Low volatility elements like zirconium (Zr), niobium (Nb), and the actinides (U, Pu, Np, Am) and their oxides, have a boiling point well above the temperatures reached in a core melt, and so only trace amounts of them are released. When the RPV fails and the core material falls into the reactor pit, the core melt no longer contains significant amounts of volatile fission products. Thus, the release of highly volatile fission products is expected to be low in this late phase of a core melt accident.
  • #25: At 06:14 on 15 March, an explosion was heard on the site and tremors were felt in the common main control room of Units 1 and 2. Unit 2 suppression chamber pressure had dropped to near atmospheric pressure57, indicating potential loss of the confinement function
  • #26: TEPCO [7] also estimated the amount of hydrogen generated through a numerical analysis considering the oxidation of the zirconium cladding. he Sandia National Laboratory also analyzed the amountof hydrogen produced during the accident [12] utilizing thecode  MELCOR  The main sources of hydrogen that must be taken into account are the oxidation of  Zircaloy by steam, the radiolysis of water, the reaction between water and boron carbide and the interaction of the molten core with the concrete of the containment
  • #27: About two hours later, white smoke (or steam) was observed being released from the Unit 2 reactor building near the fifth floor. A radiation dose rate measurement of nearly 12 mSv/h was recorded at the main gate at 09:00 on 15 March, the highest measurement since the beginning of the accident. Because of the high radiation levels, an order was issued by government authorities, two hours later, at 11:00, requiring all residents within a 20–30 km radius of the Fukushima Daiichi NPP to take shelter indoors
  • #30: What did the world learn from the Fukushima accident? What did the world learn because of the Fukushima accident? Review in-depth
  • #31: This not only helps preserve the integrity of the containment building, but can also help delay reactor core damage or melting