Service Introduction Document_(O-PLUX Summary).pdf
1. Note: This document is an excerpt translation of the original Japanese document and is only for reference purposes. In the event of any discrepancy between this translated
document and the original Japanese document, the latter shall prevail.
4. (C)Cacco Inc. All Rights Reserved. 4
*1 TOKYO SHOKO RESEARCH, LTD., “Survey on the number of EC sites in Japan introducing paid fraud detection service,” (as of the end of May 2021)
*2 Only selected companies with permission to be listed are included. As of end of April, 2022.
Hobby Food and health food PC and tablet
Cosmetics and hair care Apparel and sports
Video and audio
equipment
Travel
Furniture
and DIY
Hosting
Online shopping malls, MVNO, and others
Bank
Ticket
NFT Game
5. (C)Cacco Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5
Ecommerce Enabler/ Shopping Cart
Payment Gateway / PSP
7. Chargeback
Purchases made with
someone else's credit
card information. Both
the product and money
are uncollected due to a
chargeback request from
the credit card company.
Promotion Abuse
Promotion abuse by
users creating duplicate
accounts
Resale Fraud
Bulk purchases,
hoarding, and high
resale of products.
Claims from the original
purchasers and damage
to the brand image due
to resale also occur.
Spam Order
Nuisance behavior with
repeated orders and
cancellations, with no
intention to purchase
Sample Abuse
Unauthorized acquisition
and resale of samples that
are limited to a first time
or limited quantity
Increased
Monitoring
Increased man-hours
spent responding to
fraud by in-house
personnel who visually
check orders for
suspicious items
Point Abuse
Fraudulent point
acquisition by repeatedly
returning or canceling
orders in order to earn
points without
purchasing the products
Lost Sales
Opportunity
Opportunity losses such as
concerns about basket
drops due to 3D Secure,
suspension of foreign-
issued cards, and capped
amounts.
COD Fraud
Refusal to receive cash
on delivery orders. It
occurs with the failure of
a resale, and the loss of
sales opportunities and,
Increased return
shipping costs.
Generation of
unauthorized affiliate
commissions due to self-
made efforts. Inability to
measure correct CVRs
and negative impact on
sales promotions.
Affiliate Fraud
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10
8. Chargeback
Flow of chargeback from fraudulent card use
Fraudster orders
and receives the
products
The cardholder
notice the false
transaction
The cardholder
files a claim to the
card company
The Card company
chargeback the E-
Commerce
The Fraudster
obtains card
detail illegally
Approximately 2-3 months until the fraud is discovered
Unauthorized user Cardholder Merchant
9. Promotion Abuse
Flow of promotion abuse
The fraudster order
the discounted or
promoted product
The Fraudster make
another fake account
to claim and order the
promoted product
The honest customer
cannot claim the
promotion because the
quota has been used by
the fraudster
The EC company loses
customer trust and
revenue
The fraudster saw the
promotion and
claimed it
The effect is instantaneous, and the promotion is not effective
Unauthorized User Customer Merchant
?
?
10. 10
Resale Fraud
Flow of fraudulent reselling activities
The fraudster receives
the product
The fraudster sets up
an online store to sell
the product
People buys products
from the fraudster at an
inflated price
The E-commerce suffered
customer trust issue
The fraudster buy
discounted/ limited
products in bulk
The participating merchant will lose out customers and customers will have to
buy with the inflated price
Unauthorized User Customer Merchant
12. V
Benefit 02
Automation of
Monitoring Work
• Able to reduce
monitoring operation
workload in each
platform
• Standardizes operations
regardless of skill or
order volume.
V
Massive
Economic Impact
• Reduce the amount of
fraudulent damage and
increase Revenue
• Solid Fraud system costs
a fortune to build, but
our system can be
installed for
$249/month (lowest
price in the industry)
Benefit 03
V
Real-time
Fraud Detection
• Real-time analysis of
multiple screening factors
are combined to check
for possible fraudulent
orders/
transactions prior to
actions(like shipment)
Benefit 01
V
• Incorporating specialized
fraud consultants and
machine learning/AI rule
tuning, the our system
can responds & adapt
quickly to new
fraudulent tactics.
Benefit 04
Professionals x AI
Examinations
13. O-PLUX Case Studies - Summary
JINS (Glasses Retailer)
The Issue
Fraudulent orders and the number of
chargebacks have skyrocketed with the
increase in orders done through the
client’s e-commerce site
Engagement ROI
O-PLUX solution was implemented
within 2 months and reduced the
client’s chargeback costs by 80%
within the first four months of usage
“The API collaboration went smoothly and
was very helpful.. We feel that the significant
reduction in chargebacks is a result of the
implementation.”
-Dai Sato, IT Digital Department
DIY Factory (Online DIY Shop)
The Issue
As transactions reach 1,500 per day,
fraudulent orders and chargeback costs
cause great financial burden and
require significant man-hours
Engagement ROI
Fraudulent orders, which were
previously at an average of ~100 cases
per month, have been reduced to
almost zero
“The number of fraudulent orders decreased
rapidly from the first month of
implementation…I feel that we have become
an `EC site' that is not targeted by people
who repeatedly place malicious orders.”
-Niko Yokoyama, E-Commerce Department
PetGo (Pet Supplies Store)
The Issue
The client detects an increasing
number of fraudulent orders with
varying complexity, about 5,000 cases
per month, using their own system
Engagement ROI
During the trial phase, O-PLUX was
able to detect cases which went
unnoticed by the client’s internal
system
“I think that the fact that O-PLUX detected
fraudulent orders that went unnoticed
because our company's system had a lot of
fraud detection logic built in was more than
we expected.”
-Fumihiko Koide, Director
14. “The API collaboration went smoothly and was
very helpful.. We feel that the significant
reduction in chargebacks is a result of the
implementation.”
-Dai Sato, IT Digital Department
JINS
O-PLUX Case Studies - JINS
Pre-Implementation of O-PLUX Post-Implementation of O-PLUX
Fraudulent orders and the number of
chargebacks have skyrocketed with the
increase in orders done through the
client’s e-commerce site
O-PLUX solution was implemented
within 2 months and reduced the
client’s chargeback costs by 80%
within the first 4 months of usage
Company
80%
Reduction
All
Transactions
Chargeback
All
Transactions
Chargeback
Business Overview
Year Established
Annual Sales
Employees
Jins Co., Ltd.
Japan’s #1 Eyeglass
Brand
2018
US$ 351 million
(Aug 2022)
2,118
Credit Card
Transactions
(50%)
Credit Card
Transactions
(50%)
15. “The number of fraudulent orders decreased rapidly from the
first month of implementation…I feel that we have become an
`EC site' that is not targeted by people who repeatedly place
malicious orders.”
-Niko Yokoyama, E-Commerce Department
DIY Factory
O-PLUX Case Studies – DIY Factory
Pre-Implementation of O-PLUX Post-Implementation of O-PLUX
The client receives ~1,500 transactions
per day and manually checks for
potential fraud, which require lengthy
man-hours and does not stop cases
accurately
After unsuccessful results of installing
3D Secure initially, the client
implemented O-PLUX which was able
to prevent fraudulent orders and
reduce chargeback costs to almost zero
Company
Business Overview
Year Established
Annual Sales
Employees
Daito Co., Ltd.
Japan’s largest online
DIY shop
1952
US$ 44 million
(Dec 2022)
26
All
Transactions
Checked manually but
only 50% are stopped
successfully leading
to:
Fraudulent
Orders
Uncollected
payments
Chargeback costs
Lengthy man-hours
for manual
checking
Fraudulent orders
have decreased and
chargeback amounts
reduced to almost
zero
All
Transactions
Fully automated
transaction
monitoring
16. O-PLUX Case Studies – How Fraud is reduced
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
How Fraud is reduced after O-PLUX implementation
17. Competitor’s FDS Cacco’s FDS
Internal labor cost
for anti-fraud measures
(2~3 persons)
Fraud Detection System
operation costs
(infrastructure, software, etc.)
In-house FDS
Fraud Damage Cost
Internal labor cost
for anti-fraud measures
(0~0.5 persons)
Internal labor cost
for anti-fraud measures
(2~1 persons)
Cacco Service fee
Fraud Damage Cost
System service fee
Fraud Damage Cost
Able to reduce total cost!
■ Service fee
•Cacco’s service fee is cheapest compared to other
company
■ Internal labor cost
•Increased transactions do not increase monitoring
man-hours due to economies of scale
■ Fraud Damage cost
•High detection accuracy reduces the amount of
fraudulent damage
Internal labor costs/Fraud
damage cost can be reduced
Able to reduce total cost significantly if you use Cacco’s service compared to in-house operation
18. Cacco provides a low-cost and easily deployable option, making it accessible not only for large enterprises but also
for SMEs, thanks to its industry-leading price
Cacco
Individual FDS company Payment Gateway FDS
Service
Coverage
Cost
Overview
Deployment
Accuracy
Evalu
ation
• Most solutions are for enterprise
companies, and it leads higher price
and longer implementation time than
Cacco
• Transaction-based billing, making
the service more expensive than
Cacco
• Lower detection accuracy due to
fewer inputs handled for detection
• Low cost/short implementation
time
• Full coverage of login/payment
fraud prevention
•Provides total anti-fraud solutions •No solution to prevent login fraud •Provides total anti-fraud solutions
•95%~
•Minimum
1,000~2,000 USD per month
•4 weeks for implementation
•Accuracy is lower because only
payment information is used.
•4 weeks for implementation
•95%~
•Minimum
1,000~ USD per month •Start from 249 USD
•8~12 weeks for implementation
19. 300K USD
36K USD
Before
After
Amount of fraud damage (chargeback damage)
Large size company
(Total transaction amount: 120M USD)
Annual savings of
264K USD per year
Small-Mid size company
(Total transaction amount: 6M USD)
15K USD
1.8K USD
Annual savings of
13.2K USD
21. O-PLUX uses various detection logics to analyze order information in detail, which lead high accurate detection