SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Beneficial Ownership &
Shareholders Transparency
Prepared by Natalia Perestyuk,
Managing Partner at Network Partners
MBA, Attorney at law
FATF goal (behind RQs on BO/ST)
Identity of known or suspected criminals
True purpose of an account or property held by a
corporate vehicle
Source or use of funds or property associated with a
corporate vehicle
Key Examples to Obscure BO/ST (1)
a) shell companies (which can be established with
various forms of ownership structure), especially in
cases where there is foreign ownership which is spread
across jurisdictions
b) complex ownership and control structures
involving many layers of shares registered in the name
of other legal persons
c) bearer shares and bearer share warrants
d) unrestricted use of legal persons as directors
e) formal nominee shareholders and directors where
the identity of the nominator is undisclosed
f) informal nominee shareholders and directors, such
as close associates and family, and
g) trusts and other legal arrangements which enable a
separation of legal ownership and beneficial
ownership of assets
h) use of intermediaries in forming legal persons,
including professional intermediaries
Key Examples to Obscure BO/S (2)
Effective AML/TF System Criteria
Basic information is available publicly.
Beneficial ownership information is available to
competent authorities.
Persons who breach these measures are subject to
effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.
This results in legal persons and legal arrangements
being unattractive for criminals to misuse for money
laundering and terrorist financing
BO notion (Legal Person)
Beneficial owner refers to the natural person(s) who
ultimately owns or controls a customer and/or the natural
person on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted.
It also includes those persons who exercise ultimate
effective control over a legal person.
Reference to “ultimately owns or controls” and “ultimate
effective control” refer to situations in which
ownership/control is exercised through a chain of
ownership or by means of control other than direct
control.
R24: LP Transparency&BO
To prevent the misuse of legal persons for ML/TF.
To ensure there is adequate, accurate and timely
information on the beneficial ownership and control of
legal persons (including cases of bearer shares/warranties,
nominal directors/shareholders) that can be obtained or
accessed in a timely fashion by competent authorities.
To consider measures to facilitate access to beneficial
ownership and control information by financial
institutions (in line with R10 & R22)
BO notion (Legal Arrangement)
Natural person(s), at the end of the chain, who ultimately
owns or controls the legal arrangement, including:
those persons who exercise ultimate effective
control over the legal arrangement, and/or
the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction
is being conducted
R25: LA Transparency&BO
To prevent the misuse of legal arrangements for ML/TF.
To ensure there is adequate, accurate and timely
information on LA (including information on the settlor,
trustee and beneficiaries of express trusts), that can be
obtained or accessed in a timely fashion by competent
authorities.
To consider measures to facilitate access to beneficial
ownership and control information by financial
institutions (in line with R10 & R22)
T2S Program Timelines
Migration to T2S: Key Dates
User testing (completed)
stared in August 2014
Community testing
2nd
of March 2015
First wave of migration
22nd
of June 2015
Second wave
28th
of March 2016
Third wave
12th
of September 2016
Final wave
6th
of February 2017
4 Waves of Migration to T2S
First wave
22 June 2015
T2S Go Live
Second wave
28 March 2016
Third wave
12 September 2016
Fourth wave
6 February 2017
Bank of Greece
Securities Settlement
System (BOGS)
Euroclear Belgium Clearstream Banking
(Germany)
Centrálny depozitár cenných
papierov SR (CDCP) (Slovakia)
Depozitarul Central
(Romania)
Euroclear France KELER (Hungary) Eesti Väärtpaberikeskus (Estonia)
Malta Stock Exchange Euroclear Nederland LuxCSD (Luxembourg) Euroclear Finland
Monte Titoli (Italy) Interbolsa (Portugal) Oesterreichische
Kontrollbank (Austria)
Iberclear (Spain)
SIX SIS (Switzerland) National Bank of Belgium
Securities Settlement
Systems (NBB-SSS)
VP Lux (Luxembourg) KDD - Centralna klirinško
depotna družba (Slovenia)
VP Securities
(Denmark)
Lietuvos centrinis vertybinių
popierių depozitoriumas
(Lithuania)
BNY Mellon CSD (Belgium)
LCD - Latvijas Centralais
depozitarijs (Latvia)
Transparency regimes in EU
First layer/final layer holders of securities in CSDs
Account holders, end investors & shareholders
Stocks & Flows
EU Transparency* on Share Holdings
None info of holding:
NL, BE (bearer securities)
DE (bearer securities owned by foreign investor)
Limited by 1st
layer
CSD records: AT, EE, ES, IE, MT, SI, UK
Issuers’ access: AT, DE, ES, EE, FI, SE, SI
*up to date country status change since 2011 to be clarified
EU Transparency* on Share Flows
No real-time data on flows available to the issuers:
AT, BE, FR (bearer), HU, IT, LT, LV, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK
No inputs to maintain pre-AGM register:
DK, NO, PL, RO
*up to date country status change since 2011 to be clarified

More Related Content

ODP
BitShares 2.0 and Smartcoins
PDF
TokenSoft + Tezos (SF Meetup, July 2019)
PPS
common_law_on_contracts
PPSX
legal_risks_treatment
PDF
Rinne.2015x
PDF
Book cover
PPSX
Conracts in global_IT_brief
PDF
Final Portfolio
BitShares 2.0 and Smartcoins
TokenSoft + Tezos (SF Meetup, July 2019)
common_law_on_contracts
legal_risks_treatment
Rinne.2015x
Book cover
Conracts in global_IT_brief
Final Portfolio

Viewers also liked (6)

PPS
Conracts with customers in IT world
PDF
PPSX
Banking_Union_within_EU
DOC
current CV
PPTX
Патоморфологія хвороб. лекція 2.
DOCX
DRAFT (4.7.15) -- Body-Worn Camera Report (Moon)
Conracts with customers in IT world
Banking_Union_within_EU
current CV
Патоморфологія хвороб. лекція 2.
DRAFT (4.7.15) -- Body-Worn Camera Report (Moon)
Ad

Similar to Shareholders_Transparency_EU (20)

PDF
Lpea - Security tokens
PDF
Tokenizing SME Equity - An Introduction to the Legal Classification and Techn...
PDF
Real-World Assets STO + Institutional DeFi Integration
PPTX
Cryptocurrencies and Initial Coin Offerings under EU law
PDF
P101018 Penelitian Crypto Untuk Ekonomi Negara FSB
PPTX
Case for digital assets
PDF
Regulation of cryptocurrency in key jurisdictions
PPTX
Week 7 - Legal Issues in Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies
PPT
E. Bryan - Governance and Records Management
PPTX
Talal Tabbaa - Smart Regulations and Crypto-systemic risk
PDF
Regulation of ICOs in Ireland: An Overview of the Legal, Tax and Regulatory P...
PDF
Rex wallet
PDF
Cewg bitlicense comment
PDF
International Blockchain Conference in Groningen, Nov. 30, 2018
PDF
ESMA Advice su Crypto Asset
PDF
european_ombudsman_-_transparency_of_trilogues_response
PPT
2008 Int'l Bar Association -- Money Laundering Gatekeeper Ethics
PDF
Guidance on Beneficial Ownership
PDF
Crypto asset regulators directory
PDF
Blockchain technology-report-final
Lpea - Security tokens
Tokenizing SME Equity - An Introduction to the Legal Classification and Techn...
Real-World Assets STO + Institutional DeFi Integration
Cryptocurrencies and Initial Coin Offerings under EU law
P101018 Penelitian Crypto Untuk Ekonomi Negara FSB
Case for digital assets
Regulation of cryptocurrency in key jurisdictions
Week 7 - Legal Issues in Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies
E. Bryan - Governance and Records Management
Talal Tabbaa - Smart Regulations and Crypto-systemic risk
Regulation of ICOs in Ireland: An Overview of the Legal, Tax and Regulatory P...
Rex wallet
Cewg bitlicense comment
International Blockchain Conference in Groningen, Nov. 30, 2018
ESMA Advice su Crypto Asset
european_ombudsman_-_transparency_of_trilogues_response
2008 Int'l Bar Association -- Money Laundering Gatekeeper Ethics
Guidance on Beneficial Ownership
Crypto asset regulators directory
Blockchain technology-report-final
Ad

More from Natalia Perestyuk (10)

PPSX
"Factual" employment relationship
PPTX
Module 6 moral rights for maintenance bugs fixing and enhancements
PPTX
Module 5 contract requirement to respect "industry standards"
PPTX
Module 4 On going service consumption vs deliverables expectations
PPTX
Module 3 team leasing and way to have idle time paid
PPTX
Module 0 Сontract & Cooperation
PPTX
Module 1 team leasing vs custom app dev
PPTX
Module 2 Common law vs Civil law
PPTX
Recommendations on Ukraine's Accession to Hague Trust Convention
PPS
Recommendations on Ukraine’s Accession to Hague Trust Convention (1985)
"Factual" employment relationship
Module 6 moral rights for maintenance bugs fixing and enhancements
Module 5 contract requirement to respect "industry standards"
Module 4 On going service consumption vs deliverables expectations
Module 3 team leasing and way to have idle time paid
Module 0 Сontract & Cooperation
Module 1 team leasing vs custom app dev
Module 2 Common law vs Civil law
Recommendations on Ukraine's Accession to Hague Trust Convention
Recommendations on Ukraine’s Accession to Hague Trust Convention (1985)

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
lecture 5.pptx on family law notes well detailed
PPTX
Democracy DISCUSSION//////////////////////////.pptx
PDF
Companies Act (1).pdf in details anlysis
PPTX
kabarak lecture 2.pptx on development of family law in kenya
PPT
Gender sensitivity and fair language implementation
PDF
Black And Deep Peach Geometric Legal Advisor Firm Presentation.pdf
PPTX
Indian Medical Device Rules or Institute of Management Development and Research.
PPTX
PRODUCT LIABILITY AMID TECHNOLOGICAL DISRUPTION_ ABATING THE SURGE OF DIGITAL...
PDF
Common Estate Planning Mistakes to Avoid in Wisconsin
PDF
Palghar-286Nilemore-VoterList-Aug25-1.pdf
PPTX
Evolution of First Amendment Jurisprudence.pptx
PPT
2025 KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY LECTURE.ppt
PPTX
Court PROCESS Notes_Law Clinic Notes.pptx
PDF
Divorce Attorney Chicago – Guiding You Through Every Step
DOC
NCWU毕业证学历认证,奥利弗拿撒勒大学毕业证修改成绩单分数
PPTX
Unit 2The Making of India's Constitution
PDF
AI in Modern Warfare and Business Ethics Ortynska Law Ventures Cafe.pdf
PDF
Avoiding Costly Pitfalls Critical Errors That Could Sabotage Your OFAC Compli...
PPT
Judicial Process of Law Chapter 2 Law and Legal Systems
lecture 5.pptx on family law notes well detailed
Democracy DISCUSSION//////////////////////////.pptx
Companies Act (1).pdf in details anlysis
kabarak lecture 2.pptx on development of family law in kenya
Gender sensitivity and fair language implementation
Black And Deep Peach Geometric Legal Advisor Firm Presentation.pdf
Indian Medical Device Rules or Institute of Management Development and Research.
PRODUCT LIABILITY AMID TECHNOLOGICAL DISRUPTION_ ABATING THE SURGE OF DIGITAL...
Common Estate Planning Mistakes to Avoid in Wisconsin
Palghar-286Nilemore-VoterList-Aug25-1.pdf
Evolution of First Amendment Jurisprudence.pptx
2025 KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY LECTURE.ppt
Court PROCESS Notes_Law Clinic Notes.pptx
Divorce Attorney Chicago – Guiding You Through Every Step
NCWU毕业证学历认证,奥利弗拿撒勒大学毕业证修改成绩单分数
Unit 2The Making of India's Constitution
AI in Modern Warfare and Business Ethics Ortynska Law Ventures Cafe.pdf
Avoiding Costly Pitfalls Critical Errors That Could Sabotage Your OFAC Compli...
Judicial Process of Law Chapter 2 Law and Legal Systems

Shareholders_Transparency_EU

  • 1. Beneficial Ownership & Shareholders Transparency Prepared by Natalia Perestyuk, Managing Partner at Network Partners MBA, Attorney at law
  • 2. FATF goal (behind RQs on BO/ST) Identity of known or suspected criminals True purpose of an account or property held by a corporate vehicle Source or use of funds or property associated with a corporate vehicle
  • 3. Key Examples to Obscure BO/ST (1) a) shell companies (which can be established with various forms of ownership structure), especially in cases where there is foreign ownership which is spread across jurisdictions b) complex ownership and control structures involving many layers of shares registered in the name of other legal persons c) bearer shares and bearer share warrants d) unrestricted use of legal persons as directors
  • 4. e) formal nominee shareholders and directors where the identity of the nominator is undisclosed f) informal nominee shareholders and directors, such as close associates and family, and g) trusts and other legal arrangements which enable a separation of legal ownership and beneficial ownership of assets h) use of intermediaries in forming legal persons, including professional intermediaries Key Examples to Obscure BO/S (2)
  • 5. Effective AML/TF System Criteria Basic information is available publicly. Beneficial ownership information is available to competent authorities. Persons who breach these measures are subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions. This results in legal persons and legal arrangements being unattractive for criminals to misuse for money laundering and terrorist financing
  • 6. BO notion (Legal Person) Beneficial owner refers to the natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls a customer and/or the natural person on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted. It also includes those persons who exercise ultimate effective control over a legal person. Reference to “ultimately owns or controls” and “ultimate effective control” refer to situations in which ownership/control is exercised through a chain of ownership or by means of control other than direct control.
  • 7. R24: LP Transparency&BO To prevent the misuse of legal persons for ML/TF. To ensure there is adequate, accurate and timely information on the beneficial ownership and control of legal persons (including cases of bearer shares/warranties, nominal directors/shareholders) that can be obtained or accessed in a timely fashion by competent authorities. To consider measures to facilitate access to beneficial ownership and control information by financial institutions (in line with R10 & R22)
  • 8. BO notion (Legal Arrangement) Natural person(s), at the end of the chain, who ultimately owns or controls the legal arrangement, including: those persons who exercise ultimate effective control over the legal arrangement, and/or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted
  • 9. R25: LA Transparency&BO To prevent the misuse of legal arrangements for ML/TF. To ensure there is adequate, accurate and timely information on LA (including information on the settlor, trustee and beneficiaries of express trusts), that can be obtained or accessed in a timely fashion by competent authorities. To consider measures to facilitate access to beneficial ownership and control information by financial institutions (in line with R10 & R22)
  • 11. Migration to T2S: Key Dates User testing (completed) stared in August 2014 Community testing 2nd of March 2015 First wave of migration 22nd of June 2015 Second wave 28th of March 2016 Third wave 12th of September 2016 Final wave 6th of February 2017
  • 12. 4 Waves of Migration to T2S First wave 22 June 2015 T2S Go Live Second wave 28 March 2016 Third wave 12 September 2016 Fourth wave 6 February 2017 Bank of Greece Securities Settlement System (BOGS) Euroclear Belgium Clearstream Banking (Germany) Centrálny depozitár cenných papierov SR (CDCP) (Slovakia) Depozitarul Central (Romania) Euroclear France KELER (Hungary) Eesti Väärtpaberikeskus (Estonia) Malta Stock Exchange Euroclear Nederland LuxCSD (Luxembourg) Euroclear Finland Monte Titoli (Italy) Interbolsa (Portugal) Oesterreichische Kontrollbank (Austria) Iberclear (Spain) SIX SIS (Switzerland) National Bank of Belgium Securities Settlement Systems (NBB-SSS) VP Lux (Luxembourg) KDD - Centralna klirinško depotna družba (Slovenia) VP Securities (Denmark) Lietuvos centrinis vertybinių popierių depozitoriumas (Lithuania) BNY Mellon CSD (Belgium) LCD - Latvijas Centralais depozitarijs (Latvia)
  • 13. Transparency regimes in EU First layer/final layer holders of securities in CSDs Account holders, end investors & shareholders Stocks & Flows
  • 14. EU Transparency* on Share Holdings None info of holding: NL, BE (bearer securities) DE (bearer securities owned by foreign investor) Limited by 1st layer CSD records: AT, EE, ES, IE, MT, SI, UK Issuers’ access: AT, DE, ES, EE, FI, SE, SI *up to date country status change since 2011 to be clarified
  • 15. EU Transparency* on Share Flows No real-time data on flows available to the issuers: AT, BE, FR (bearer), HU, IT, LT, LV, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK No inputs to maintain pre-AGM register: DK, NO, PL, RO *up to date country status change since 2011 to be clarified

Editor's Notes

  • #8: In particular, countries that have legal persons that are able to issue bearer shares or bearer share warrants, or which allow nominee shareholders or nominee directors, should take effective measures to ensure that they are not misused for money laundering or terrorist financing. Countries should consider measures to facilitate access to beneficial ownership and control information by financial institutions and DNFBPs undertaking the requirements set out in Recommendations 10 and 22.
  • #12: Migration Phase (June 2015 - February 2017) Migration to T2S will take place in waves (including a contingency wave: foreseen by May 2017) beginning with the first wave in June 2015. The allocation of CSDs for each wave is available under the tab “Migration Weekends”. The objective of the migration phase is to enable a smooth and successful transition to the usage of the T2S services for the CSDs, CBs and their communities. Several steps are required in preparation of the migration weekend, including readiness of the production environment (SP13) and the upload of common static data. The different stages of the migration phase are outlined below. SP14.x – Ready to Connect to Production SP14.x marks the confirmation by CSDs and CBs that they can technically connect to the T2S production environment. A connectivity guide has been provided to CSDs and CBs by the Eurosystem and there is a technical helpdesk in place for support during production. SP15.x – Ready to Upload Static Data SP15.x marks the start of the upload of the Static Data to T2S. This refers to business information that is common to all T2S users. E.g. the SWIFT BIC Directory. SP16.x – Ready for T2S Go Live SP16.x marks the last checkpoint before migration. All common static data has been uploaded. The organisation and timeline of the migration weekend have been defined, staff have been trained, and supporting documentation has been delivered to the CSDs and CBs. Start T2S Operations The T2S Go-Live date refers to the date at which the first group of CSDs start operations on the T2S platform. The migration phase will continue after this date, while the remaining groups of CSDs and other market participants migrate to T2S. Synchronisation points (SP) Definition Throughout the planning of the T2S project, the notion of a Synchronisation Point is used. A synchronisation point is a point in time at which the T2S Programme is to reach a specific objective. The purpose of a synchronisation point is to monitor at foreseen time intervals that the progress of all parties is in line with the programme plan. There are 17 Synchronisation Points in total marking the achievement of significant milestones in the plan, for example the start of connectivity set-up and the start of the different testing phases. A short description of each Synchronisation Point is provided in each phase. http://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/t2s/progplan/html/index.en.html