SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 | P a g e
SERIAL
NO.
CONTENT PAGE NOS.
1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
2. STEP l:The Average for questions representing HR
professional’s effectiveness
2
3. STEP ll: The average for questions representing
Quality & Business Focus of HR professional
2
4. STEP lll: The average for questions representing
Efficiency focus of HR professional
3
5. STEP lV: The average for questions representing
Lack of HR-Line collaboration
3
6. STEP V: The average for questions representing
Corner office support & expectations
4
7. STEP Vl: Report the correlation between the average
scores HR professional’s effectiveness and four
points discussed in step II to step V (from the article
Why we hate HR)
4-5
8. STEP VII: Compare the difference between HR
professionals and other professionals in terms of
factors leading to negative perception of HR
5
9. STEP Vlll: Compare the difference between HR
professionals and other professionals in terms of
factors leading to positive perception of HR
6
10. STEP Xl: Analyze the difference/similarity between
factors that lead to positive and negative perception
for two groups: (a) HR managers (b) Line managers
6-7
SHRM-ANALYSIS (SURVEY BASED PROJECT)
PROF.GLORYSON CHALIL
RACHNA RYALI
2221044
PGCHRM12
BEGUMPET
2 | P a g e
STEP l: The Average for questions representing HR professional’s effectiveness:
Accounts
Manager
IT
Manager
IT-
Project
Manager
Logistic
manager
Opera-
tions
manager
Operations
manager
General
manager-
S&D HR1 HR2 HR3
Credibility
8 7 7 7 4 6 3 6 7 9
Respect
10 9 8 7 3 5 5 5 8 8
Effectiveness
8 7 8 8 6 5 5 5 10 8
Average 8.67 7.67 7.67 7.33 4.33 5.33 4.33 5.33 8.33 8.33
Total average-6.73
The data in above table illustrate that the line managers who work closely or on day-today basis
with HR department rates them low on their effectiveness criteria.
STEP ll: The average for questions representing Quality & Business Focus of HR
professional:
Accounts
Manager
IT
Manager
IT-
Project
Manager
Logistic
manager
Ops.
manager
Ops.
manager
General
manager
-S&D
HR
1
HR
2
HR
3
Avg.
Questions
nos.
7 4 3 1 4 6 3 4 2 4 5 3.6
9 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 6 6 4.8
8 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 1 5 6 3.1
10 3 2 1 5 4 2 2 2 5 5 3.1
11 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 4 5 3.5
Total average: 3.62
Managers agree that HR professionals exhibit lower levels of business understanding than
others and that less competent people are parked in HR and thus the best managers choose
profession other than HR. However they do not completely agree that HR professionals are less
educated in comparison to their colleagues and hence the best HR not always prefer to move to
other departments.
The overall average suggests that managers do believe HR professionals have less overall focus
on quality & business.
3 | P a g e
STEP lll: The average for questions representing Efficiency focus of HR professional:
Accounts
Manager
IT
Manager
IT-
Project
Manager
Logistic
manager
Ops.
manager
Ops.
manager
General
manager
-S&D
HR
1
HR
2
HR
3
Avg.
Questions
nos.
4 5 4 4 2 5 6 5 5 6 5 4.7
1 5 6 4 4 6 5 5 3 5 6 4.9
5 5 5 2 5 5 2 4 6 5 5 4.4
6 6 4 3 4 4 5 5 3 6 6 4.6
2 2 4 3 2 3 1 5 2 4 5 3.1
Total Average: 4.34
Managers are of the view that HR professionals have a short term mindset and hence they
focus more on application of activities rather than its outcome or the overall business objective.
Overall average suggests that HR professionals are efficient however their efficiency is more
towards introduction or implementation of activities rather than its outcome.
STEP lV: The average for questions representing Lack of HR-Line collaboration:
Accounts
Manager
IT
Manager
IT-
Project
Manager
Logistic
manager
Ops.
manager
Ops.
manager
General
manager
-S&D
HR
1
HR
2
HR
3
Avg.
Questions
nos.
12 4 4 5 4 3 2 4 4 6 5 4.1
13 6 4 5 4 5 6 5 6 5 6 5.2
14 5 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4.7
15 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 6 5 4.2
16 5 4 4 4 no -idea 6 4 3 5 5 4.4
17 4 3 4 4 5 4 3 3 5 6 4.1
3 4 5 3 4 2 3 4 5 6 4 4
Total Average: 4.38
Results suggests that the bureaucratic & standardize nature of HR professionals result in
stiffness of an organization which not only reduces the discretionary freedom of line managers
over their subordinates but also fails to reflect on the business diversity.
Overall result reflects that both HR professionals are line managers are of opinion that there is
a lack of HR-line collaboration.
4 | P a g e
Step V: The average for questions representing Corner office support & expectations:
Accounts
Manager
IT
Manager
IT-
Project
Manager
Logistic
manager
Ops.
manager
Ops.
manager
General
manager
-S&D
HR
1
HR
2
HR
3
Avg.
Questions
nos.
18 3 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4.1
19 3 4 1 5 5 5 5 5 4 6 4.3
20 4 4 5 4 nil 5 5 6 5 6 4.9
21 3 4 4 4 3 6 4 5 5 4 4.2
23 5 4 3 4 3 5 2 5 5 5 4.1
22 4 3 4 5 3 4 3 6 5 4 4.1
Total Average: 4.28
Managers slightly agree however HR professionals moderately and strongly agree that HR
professionals are puppet to the top management and that they are given less preference and
are merely treated as firefighters rather than policy makers.
STEP Vl: Report the correlation between the average scores HR professional’s
effectiveness and four points discussed in step II to step V (from the article Why we
hate HR)
Hr professionals are rated just above average on the scale of 10 (score being 6.73) on their
overall effectiveness as other professionals agrees that there is a slight scope & need of
improvement on following four parameters-Quality & business focus (3.62), Efficiency (4.34),
Hr-line collaboration (4.38) and corner office support & expectations (4.28).
Below listed are few reasons which led to the low scores of these four parameters.
1. Quality & business focus of HR
HR lack independent thinkers and people who stand up as moral compasses.
HR represents low risk parking spot.
As guardians of a company's talent HR has to understand how people serve
corporate objectives however most HR managers are either not interested in or
equipped for doing business.
2. Efficiency focus of HR
HR managers give more importance to activities than to its outcome.
HR managers might be good at hiring & pursuing performance management
evaluations however they fail to link these metrics to business performance.
5 | P a g e
The decisions made about the resources are far less sophisticated, reliable &
consistent as it does not take into consideration the ROI on these resources.
3. Lack of HR-line collaboration
The bureaucratic & standardize nature of HR professionals result in stiffness of
an organization which not only reduces the discretionary freedom of line
managers over their subordinates but also fails to reflect on the business
diversity.
HR forfeits long term value for short term cost efficiency as they try to fit good &
average performers in a narrow band of salaries their by leaving the good
performers disappointed. The consequence is faced by line managers for the
same.
4. Corner office support & expectation
HR professional feels that they are puppet to the top management and that they
are given less preference and are merely treated as firefighters rather than policy
makers.
STEP VII: Compare the difference between HR professionals and other
professionals in terms of factors leading to negative perception of HR
Accounts
Manager
IT
Manager
IT-Project
Manager
Logistic
manager
Ops.
manager
Ops.
manager
General
manager
-S&D
Avg. HR
1
HR
2
HR
3
Avg.
4 4 7 4 8 7 5 5.57 4 3 3 3.33
4 4 4 4 6 10 6 5.43 1 2 2 1.67
7 7 4 7 7 7 1 5.71 4 3 3 3.33
4 4 10 7 7 4 1 5.28 7 3 4 4.67
7 4 10 1 2 1 2 3.86 4 4 3 3.67
1 1 10 1 1 1 3 2.57 1 3 2 2
4 4 7 4 3 7 8 5.28 4 3 3 3.33
4 10 4 4 2 10 5 5.57 1 2 4 2.33
7 7 4 7 10 7 8 7.14 4 4 2 3.33
7 4 4 10 9 10 8 7.43 1 3 3 2.33
While the total average score of Line managers is 5.38, the average score of Hr professionals is
2.99 on the factor leading to negative perception. The result shows that other professionals are
of view that questions leading to negative perception holds true for HR professionals however
HR professionals are of opposite view.
6 | P a g e
STEP Vlll: Compare the difference between HR professionals and other professionals
in terms of factors leading to positive perception of HR
Accounts
Manager
IT
Manager
IT-Project
Manager
Logistic
manager
Ops.
manager
Ops.
manager
General
manager-
S&D
Avg. HR
1
HR
2
HR
3
Avg.
7 4 10 4 5 7 3 5.71 7 8 8 7.67
7 7 10 7 6 7 8 7.43 10 8 9 9
4 4 10 4 2 10 3 5.28 10 9 7 8.67
1 1 10 7 8 10 5 6 7 7 8 7.33
10 10 4 7 4 7 5 6.71 7 7 9 7.67
10 7 7 7 5 4 6 6.57 4 8 9 7
7 4 7 7 6 10 5 6.57 10 7 8 8.33
10 4 7 7 7 10 7 7.42 10 9 8 9
10 10 7 4 8 7 8 7.71 7 8 7 7.33
7 7 4 4 5 7 8 6 7 8 7 7.33
The total average score of line managers is 6.54 & that of Hr professionals is 7.93. Clearly the
difference is not much and thus it demonstrate that majorly both HR professionals and line
managers are of same view about the factors that lead to the positive perception of HR.
STEP Xl: Analyze the difference/similarity between factors that lead to positive and
negative perception for two groups: (a) HR managers (b) Line managers
Factors leading to negative perception of HR: (points of difference)
Unlike other professionals there is a difference between what HR practices & what it
preaches.
HR focuses less on business objectives and has less influence on organizational decisions
which creates a mismatch between Top management & HR professionals.
HR adopts the bureaucratic way of working that slows down the organizational growth.
HR enjoys undue powers and hence line managers and employees find it difficult to
work with them.
Factors leading to negative perception of HR: (points of parity)
HR professionals pursue efficiency in lieu of value for business.
HR professionals are not as smart as other professionals.
HR's contribution to an organization is not at all measureable.
Factors leading to positive perception of HR: (points of parity)
Strong HR professionals help organizations to cope with the change & to lay a strong
cultural foundation of an organization.
7 | P a g e
HR professionals are responsible for the recruitment of talented employees, their up-
gradation through training and for their effective PMA.
Factors leading to positive perception of HR: (points of difference)
HR professionals act as a role model in organization.
HR can impact the skill level of employees through training.
HR supports line managers to achieve their goals.

More Related Content

DOCX
Performance appraisal human resource management
PDF
Trotman.Gareth.20160822.Evalex35 Selection Report v2
PDF
Using Calibration Effectively - Total Workforce Performance Management
PDF
Performance Management - Herman Augnis
PDF
Performance Appraisal Methods of Multinational organization
DOCX
Effective performance appraisal
PDF
EFHK Spring 2016_manager effectiveness_Final
PDF
Questionnaire on Performance Management System
Performance appraisal human resource management
Trotman.Gareth.20160822.Evalex35 Selection Report v2
Using Calibration Effectively - Total Workforce Performance Management
Performance Management - Herman Augnis
Performance Appraisal Methods of Multinational organization
Effective performance appraisal
EFHK Spring 2016_manager effectiveness_Final
Questionnaire on Performance Management System

What's hot (19)

DOCX
Research paper on performance appraisal
PPT
Employee survey as a measure for improving companies business success and growth
DOCX
Performance Management - Herman Augnis
PPTX
Module 12: Job Classification & Merit Increase System
DOC
Questionnaire of performance appraisal
DOC
Performance Management - Herman Augnis
PDF
Leadership, Intangibles & Talent Q3 2010
DOCX
Performance Management - Herman Augnis
PPS
Removing Bottlenecks to High Performance
PDF
Improving hr businesspartnereffectivenesssss
DOCX
Review of literature on performance appraisal system
PDF
The Future of HR: Delivering Competitive Advantage in Your Organization
DOC
Effectiveness of Performance appraisal system Power Soap ltd manufacturing in...
DOCX
Chapter 1
PPT
The Strategic Role Of Hrm
PDF
Designing an effective pay for performance compensation pay
PDF
Performance management survey
PDF
Mc kinsey toward a_value creating_board
PDF
Calibrating Performance Ratings
Research paper on performance appraisal
Employee survey as a measure for improving companies business success and growth
Performance Management - Herman Augnis
Module 12: Job Classification & Merit Increase System
Questionnaire of performance appraisal
Performance Management - Herman Augnis
Leadership, Intangibles & Talent Q3 2010
Performance Management - Herman Augnis
Removing Bottlenecks to High Performance
Improving hr businesspartnereffectivenesssss
Review of literature on performance appraisal system
The Future of HR: Delivering Competitive Advantage in Your Organization
Effectiveness of Performance appraisal system Power Soap ltd manufacturing in...
Chapter 1
The Strategic Role Of Hrm
Designing an effective pay for performance compensation pay
Performance management survey
Mc kinsey toward a_value creating_board
Calibrating Performance Ratings
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PDF
PDF
DOCX
Amit
DOC
Designing of t& d model
DOCX
Smu mba sem 4 ib winter 2015 assignments
PDF
M M Bagali, Recruitment Project, Hrm, Hrd,
DOCX
Smu bscit sem 5 winter 2015 assignments
DOCX
Smu bca sem 5 winter 2015 assignments
PPTX
Shrm notes
DOCX
Smu mba sem 3 finance winter 2015 assignments
PPT
Introtruction to hrd
DOCX
Smu mba sem 4 tqm winter 2015 assignments
DOC
Lecture 2 strategic human resource management - Farooq Omar
DOCX
Role of human resource development in public sector
DOCX
Profile A5
PPTX
Human resource development in Public Sector ppt
DOCX
comparative Analysis of mutual fund
DOCX
Smu mba sem 4 pm winter 2015 assignments
DOCX
Human Resource Development.
PPTX
Human Resource Development(Hrd)
Amit
Designing of t& d model
Smu mba sem 4 ib winter 2015 assignments
M M Bagali, Recruitment Project, Hrm, Hrd,
Smu bscit sem 5 winter 2015 assignments
Smu bca sem 5 winter 2015 assignments
Shrm notes
Smu mba sem 3 finance winter 2015 assignments
Introtruction to hrd
Smu mba sem 4 tqm winter 2015 assignments
Lecture 2 strategic human resource management - Farooq Omar
Role of human resource development in public sector
Profile A5
Human resource development in Public Sector ppt
comparative Analysis of mutual fund
Smu mba sem 4 pm winter 2015 assignments
Human Resource Development.
Human Resource Development(Hrd)
Ad

Similar to Shrm analysis of survey based project (20)

PDF
Human Capital Management's Employee Disconnect. A Global Snapshot
PPT
Edineb Presentation
DOCX
Performance appraisal programs
DOCX
22 PEOPLE & STRATEGYCapturing the Credible Activist to.docx
PPTX
Chapter 2 The HR Profession - CJ copy (1).pptx
DOCX
Performance appraisal best practices
DOCX
Performance appraisal best practices
PPT
One Page Talent Management
PPT
Managing Leadership Talent
PPTX
Drive and Thrive- HRBP .pptx
PPTX
The Powerful Act Of Coaching Employees
DOCX
Performance appraisal mistakes
DOCX
A study on performance appraisal of banking sector
PPT
Performance appraisal final copy
PPT
Performance appraisal final copy
PPT
Performance appraisal final copy
PPTX
Reinventing Performance Management: How to Measure Performance, Boost Employe...
PDF
8 150812201129-lva1-app6891 (2)
PDF
Human resources scorecard
PPTX
From Administration to C-Suite: The Five Stages of Human Resources Development
Human Capital Management's Employee Disconnect. A Global Snapshot
Edineb Presentation
Performance appraisal programs
22 PEOPLE & STRATEGYCapturing the Credible Activist to.docx
Chapter 2 The HR Profession - CJ copy (1).pptx
Performance appraisal best practices
Performance appraisal best practices
One Page Talent Management
Managing Leadership Talent
Drive and Thrive- HRBP .pptx
The Powerful Act Of Coaching Employees
Performance appraisal mistakes
A study on performance appraisal of banking sector
Performance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copy
Performance appraisal final copy
Reinventing Performance Management: How to Measure Performance, Boost Employe...
8 150812201129-lva1-app6891 (2)
Human resources scorecard
From Administration to C-Suite: The Five Stages of Human Resources Development

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PPTX
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PPTX
Digestion and Absorption of Carbohydrates, Proteina and Fats
PDF
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
PDF
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PPTX
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PDF
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
PPTX
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
PDF
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
PPTX
Unit 4 Skeletal System.ppt.pptxopresentatiom
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
Digestion and Absorption of Carbohydrates, Proteina and Fats
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
advance database management system book.pdf
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
Unit 4 Skeletal System.ppt.pptxopresentatiom
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming

Shrm analysis of survey based project

  • 1. 1 | P a g e SERIAL NO. CONTENT PAGE NOS. 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2. STEP l:The Average for questions representing HR professional’s effectiveness 2 3. STEP ll: The average for questions representing Quality & Business Focus of HR professional 2 4. STEP lll: The average for questions representing Efficiency focus of HR professional 3 5. STEP lV: The average for questions representing Lack of HR-Line collaboration 3 6. STEP V: The average for questions representing Corner office support & expectations 4 7. STEP Vl: Report the correlation between the average scores HR professional’s effectiveness and four points discussed in step II to step V (from the article Why we hate HR) 4-5 8. STEP VII: Compare the difference between HR professionals and other professionals in terms of factors leading to negative perception of HR 5 9. STEP Vlll: Compare the difference between HR professionals and other professionals in terms of factors leading to positive perception of HR 6 10. STEP Xl: Analyze the difference/similarity between factors that lead to positive and negative perception for two groups: (a) HR managers (b) Line managers 6-7 SHRM-ANALYSIS (SURVEY BASED PROJECT) PROF.GLORYSON CHALIL RACHNA RYALI 2221044 PGCHRM12 BEGUMPET
  • 2. 2 | P a g e STEP l: The Average for questions representing HR professional’s effectiveness: Accounts Manager IT Manager IT- Project Manager Logistic manager Opera- tions manager Operations manager General manager- S&D HR1 HR2 HR3 Credibility 8 7 7 7 4 6 3 6 7 9 Respect 10 9 8 7 3 5 5 5 8 8 Effectiveness 8 7 8 8 6 5 5 5 10 8 Average 8.67 7.67 7.67 7.33 4.33 5.33 4.33 5.33 8.33 8.33 Total average-6.73 The data in above table illustrate that the line managers who work closely or on day-today basis with HR department rates them low on their effectiveness criteria. STEP ll: The average for questions representing Quality & Business Focus of HR professional: Accounts Manager IT Manager IT- Project Manager Logistic manager Ops. manager Ops. manager General manager -S&D HR 1 HR 2 HR 3 Avg. Questions nos. 7 4 3 1 4 6 3 4 2 4 5 3.6 9 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 6 6 4.8 8 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 1 5 6 3.1 10 3 2 1 5 4 2 2 2 5 5 3.1 11 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 4 5 3.5 Total average: 3.62 Managers agree that HR professionals exhibit lower levels of business understanding than others and that less competent people are parked in HR and thus the best managers choose profession other than HR. However they do not completely agree that HR professionals are less educated in comparison to their colleagues and hence the best HR not always prefer to move to other departments. The overall average suggests that managers do believe HR professionals have less overall focus on quality & business.
  • 3. 3 | P a g e STEP lll: The average for questions representing Efficiency focus of HR professional: Accounts Manager IT Manager IT- Project Manager Logistic manager Ops. manager Ops. manager General manager -S&D HR 1 HR 2 HR 3 Avg. Questions nos. 4 5 4 4 2 5 6 5 5 6 5 4.7 1 5 6 4 4 6 5 5 3 5 6 4.9 5 5 5 2 5 5 2 4 6 5 5 4.4 6 6 4 3 4 4 5 5 3 6 6 4.6 2 2 4 3 2 3 1 5 2 4 5 3.1 Total Average: 4.34 Managers are of the view that HR professionals have a short term mindset and hence they focus more on application of activities rather than its outcome or the overall business objective. Overall average suggests that HR professionals are efficient however their efficiency is more towards introduction or implementation of activities rather than its outcome. STEP lV: The average for questions representing Lack of HR-Line collaboration: Accounts Manager IT Manager IT- Project Manager Logistic manager Ops. manager Ops. manager General manager -S&D HR 1 HR 2 HR 3 Avg. Questions nos. 12 4 4 5 4 3 2 4 4 6 5 4.1 13 6 4 5 4 5 6 5 6 5 6 5.2 14 5 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4.7 15 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 6 5 4.2 16 5 4 4 4 no -idea 6 4 3 5 5 4.4 17 4 3 4 4 5 4 3 3 5 6 4.1 3 4 5 3 4 2 3 4 5 6 4 4 Total Average: 4.38 Results suggests that the bureaucratic & standardize nature of HR professionals result in stiffness of an organization which not only reduces the discretionary freedom of line managers over their subordinates but also fails to reflect on the business diversity. Overall result reflects that both HR professionals are line managers are of opinion that there is a lack of HR-line collaboration.
  • 4. 4 | P a g e Step V: The average for questions representing Corner office support & expectations: Accounts Manager IT Manager IT- Project Manager Logistic manager Ops. manager Ops. manager General manager -S&D HR 1 HR 2 HR 3 Avg. Questions nos. 18 3 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4.1 19 3 4 1 5 5 5 5 5 4 6 4.3 20 4 4 5 4 nil 5 5 6 5 6 4.9 21 3 4 4 4 3 6 4 5 5 4 4.2 23 5 4 3 4 3 5 2 5 5 5 4.1 22 4 3 4 5 3 4 3 6 5 4 4.1 Total Average: 4.28 Managers slightly agree however HR professionals moderately and strongly agree that HR professionals are puppet to the top management and that they are given less preference and are merely treated as firefighters rather than policy makers. STEP Vl: Report the correlation between the average scores HR professional’s effectiveness and four points discussed in step II to step V (from the article Why we hate HR) Hr professionals are rated just above average on the scale of 10 (score being 6.73) on their overall effectiveness as other professionals agrees that there is a slight scope & need of improvement on following four parameters-Quality & business focus (3.62), Efficiency (4.34), Hr-line collaboration (4.38) and corner office support & expectations (4.28). Below listed are few reasons which led to the low scores of these four parameters. 1. Quality & business focus of HR HR lack independent thinkers and people who stand up as moral compasses. HR represents low risk parking spot. As guardians of a company's talent HR has to understand how people serve corporate objectives however most HR managers are either not interested in or equipped for doing business. 2. Efficiency focus of HR HR managers give more importance to activities than to its outcome. HR managers might be good at hiring & pursuing performance management evaluations however they fail to link these metrics to business performance.
  • 5. 5 | P a g e The decisions made about the resources are far less sophisticated, reliable & consistent as it does not take into consideration the ROI on these resources. 3. Lack of HR-line collaboration The bureaucratic & standardize nature of HR professionals result in stiffness of an organization which not only reduces the discretionary freedom of line managers over their subordinates but also fails to reflect on the business diversity. HR forfeits long term value for short term cost efficiency as they try to fit good & average performers in a narrow band of salaries their by leaving the good performers disappointed. The consequence is faced by line managers for the same. 4. Corner office support & expectation HR professional feels that they are puppet to the top management and that they are given less preference and are merely treated as firefighters rather than policy makers. STEP VII: Compare the difference between HR professionals and other professionals in terms of factors leading to negative perception of HR Accounts Manager IT Manager IT-Project Manager Logistic manager Ops. manager Ops. manager General manager -S&D Avg. HR 1 HR 2 HR 3 Avg. 4 4 7 4 8 7 5 5.57 4 3 3 3.33 4 4 4 4 6 10 6 5.43 1 2 2 1.67 7 7 4 7 7 7 1 5.71 4 3 3 3.33 4 4 10 7 7 4 1 5.28 7 3 4 4.67 7 4 10 1 2 1 2 3.86 4 4 3 3.67 1 1 10 1 1 1 3 2.57 1 3 2 2 4 4 7 4 3 7 8 5.28 4 3 3 3.33 4 10 4 4 2 10 5 5.57 1 2 4 2.33 7 7 4 7 10 7 8 7.14 4 4 2 3.33 7 4 4 10 9 10 8 7.43 1 3 3 2.33 While the total average score of Line managers is 5.38, the average score of Hr professionals is 2.99 on the factor leading to negative perception. The result shows that other professionals are of view that questions leading to negative perception holds true for HR professionals however HR professionals are of opposite view.
  • 6. 6 | P a g e STEP Vlll: Compare the difference between HR professionals and other professionals in terms of factors leading to positive perception of HR Accounts Manager IT Manager IT-Project Manager Logistic manager Ops. manager Ops. manager General manager- S&D Avg. HR 1 HR 2 HR 3 Avg. 7 4 10 4 5 7 3 5.71 7 8 8 7.67 7 7 10 7 6 7 8 7.43 10 8 9 9 4 4 10 4 2 10 3 5.28 10 9 7 8.67 1 1 10 7 8 10 5 6 7 7 8 7.33 10 10 4 7 4 7 5 6.71 7 7 9 7.67 10 7 7 7 5 4 6 6.57 4 8 9 7 7 4 7 7 6 10 5 6.57 10 7 8 8.33 10 4 7 7 7 10 7 7.42 10 9 8 9 10 10 7 4 8 7 8 7.71 7 8 7 7.33 7 7 4 4 5 7 8 6 7 8 7 7.33 The total average score of line managers is 6.54 & that of Hr professionals is 7.93. Clearly the difference is not much and thus it demonstrate that majorly both HR professionals and line managers are of same view about the factors that lead to the positive perception of HR. STEP Xl: Analyze the difference/similarity between factors that lead to positive and negative perception for two groups: (a) HR managers (b) Line managers Factors leading to negative perception of HR: (points of difference) Unlike other professionals there is a difference between what HR practices & what it preaches. HR focuses less on business objectives and has less influence on organizational decisions which creates a mismatch between Top management & HR professionals. HR adopts the bureaucratic way of working that slows down the organizational growth. HR enjoys undue powers and hence line managers and employees find it difficult to work with them. Factors leading to negative perception of HR: (points of parity) HR professionals pursue efficiency in lieu of value for business. HR professionals are not as smart as other professionals. HR's contribution to an organization is not at all measureable. Factors leading to positive perception of HR: (points of parity) Strong HR professionals help organizations to cope with the change & to lay a strong cultural foundation of an organization.
  • 7. 7 | P a g e HR professionals are responsible for the recruitment of talented employees, their up- gradation through training and for their effective PMA. Factors leading to positive perception of HR: (points of difference) HR professionals act as a role model in organization. HR can impact the skill level of employees through training. HR supports line managers to achieve their goals.