SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Significant test (T-test) on average IB grades between diff IB classes.
Data independent of each other.
 Showing normal distribution
 Minimum sample size of 15 for each data set
 Similar variance
Hypotheses
Null Hypothesis (H0) – No significant difference between different IB classes.
Alternate Hypothesis (HA) – A significant difference between different IB classes.
Steps for T test
1. State the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis based on your
research question
2. Set critical P level at P = 0.05 (5% by chance)
3. Perform t test and if P > 0.05 or t value < t critical, accept null hypothesis
Perform t test and if P < 0.05 or t value > t critical, reject null
hypothesis
4. Write your conclusion is there a significant difference between mean of
two samples
Procedure :
1. The average IB scores from two different IB classes were collected
2. The scores are then tabulated according to the table below.
3. The data is then processed using the formulas given for the student t-test.
4. The processed data is analyzed and a conclusion is then found.
Data Collection
Average Scores for IB Class 3
Student Score(x) Sorted Value Class Frequency Score (x2)
A 4.8 4.1 4.1 – 4.5 | | 23.04
B 5.6 4.1 31.36
C 4.7 4.7 4.6 – 5.0 | | | | | | 22.09
D 5.5 4.7 30.25
E 5.3 4.8 5.1 – 5.5 | | | | 28.09
F 6.0 4.8 36.00
G 4.1 5.0 5.6 – 6.0 | | | 16.81
H 5.1 5.0 26.01
I 5.1 5.1 6.1 – 6.5 | 26.01
J 4.8 5.1 23.04
K 5.0 5.3 25.00
L 6.0 5.5 36.00
M 4.7 5.6 22.09
N 5.0 6.0 25.00
O 4.1 6.0 16.81
P 6.3 6.3 39.69
n = 16 Σx = 82.1 Σx2 = 427.29
Average Scores for IB Class 2
Student Score(x) Sorted Value Class Frequency Score (x2)
A 5.4 1.4 1.0 – 1.5 | 29.16
B 4.2 3.2 17.64
C 5.5 3.4 3.1 – 3.5 | | | 30.25
D 1.4 3.5 1.96
E 5.3 4.2 4.1 – 4.5 | | | 28.09
F 5.3 4.5 28.09
G 4.5 4.5 5.1 – 5.5 | | | | 20.25
H 3.2 5.3 10.24
I 7.0 5.3 5.6 – 6.0 | | | 49.00
J 6.4 5.4 40.96
K 5.8 5.5 6.1 -6.5 | 33.64
L 3.4 5.7 11.56
M 5.7 5.8 6.6 – 7.0 | 32.49
N 3.5 5.9 12.25
O 4.5 6.4 20.25
P 5.9 7.0 34.81
n = 16 Σx = 77.4 Σx2 = 400.64
Showing Normal Distribution for both Classes
Detail calculation using formula
Detail Calculation using Excel
1. Follow instruction shown below and choose t test equal variance
2. For variable 1 – choose range class 1, variable 2 – choose class 2
3. Display results from Excel
t value = 0.82, t critical = 2.04
t value < t critical (0.82 < 2.04) Do no reject null hypothesis
p value = 0.41 > 0.05
Conclusion and Evaluation
The tvalue is less than the tcrit (0.82 < 2.04), or P value > 0.05, this shows that
there is no significant difference between the two IB classes. Thus, the null
hypothesis is accepted (fail to reject) over the alternative hypothesis.
Significance was determined by t test and P > 0.05, there is not enough
evidence to reject the Null Hypothesis, (There is no significant difference
between both classes)

More Related Content

PPTX
Assessment of Learning 1: Chapter 5 - Utilization of Assessment Data
PPT
Assessing Maths Literacy July 2007
PPT
Interpretation of Assessment Results
DOCX
he Comparative Study between Grade Level and Spelling Proficiency of Selected...
PDF
Lecture 03 Part 02 - All Examples of Chapter 02 by Muhammad Haroon
PPTX
Introduction to Statistics
PDF
Cir icse 02072020
PPTX
Scaling Z-scores T-scores C-scores
Assessment of Learning 1: Chapter 5 - Utilization of Assessment Data
Assessing Maths Literacy July 2007
Interpretation of Assessment Results
he Comparative Study between Grade Level and Spelling Proficiency of Selected...
Lecture 03 Part 02 - All Examples of Chapter 02 by Muhammad Haroon
Introduction to Statistics
Cir icse 02072020
Scaling Z-scores T-scores C-scores

What's hot (18)

PPTX
Imad Feneir - One way anova
PDF
Measure of Central Tendancy
PPT
Unit 5 lesson 1
PPT
NIOS STD X Economics Chapter 17 & 18 Collection, Presentation and analysis of...
PPTX
Measurement of central tendency
PPTX
Percentiles
PPTX
The t Test for Two Related Samples
DOC
Module 2 statistics
PPT
Mann Whitney U Test
PPTX
Measure of central tendency
PPTX
Presentation on ANOVA
PPTX
Statistics
PDF
Student Study Guide Physics 534
PPTX
numerical method in statistics (MEAN AND MEDIAN)
PPT
Mann Whitney U Test And Chi Squared
PPT
Clarence Johnson, Dissertation PPT, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation...
PPTX
Mode of Grouped Data - Math 7 (4th Quarter)
PPTX
Sampling s3 12-01-17-2012
Imad Feneir - One way anova
Measure of Central Tendancy
Unit 5 lesson 1
NIOS STD X Economics Chapter 17 & 18 Collection, Presentation and analysis of...
Measurement of central tendency
Percentiles
The t Test for Two Related Samples
Module 2 statistics
Mann Whitney U Test
Measure of central tendency
Presentation on ANOVA
Statistics
Student Study Guide Physics 534
numerical method in statistics (MEAN AND MEDIAN)
Mann Whitney U Test And Chi Squared
Clarence Johnson, Dissertation PPT, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertation...
Mode of Grouped Data - Math 7 (4th Quarter)
Sampling s3 12-01-17-2012
Ad

Similar to Significant test using student T test (20)

DOC
Significant test using One Way Anova
PPTX
AlsamerLagoyo-assessment for teachers education
PPTX
assessment on education for ptcp for teacher
DOCX
EPS 525 – Introduction to StatisticsAssignment No. 5 – One-w.docx
PPTX
Analysis and interpretation of Assessment.pptx
PPTX
Inferential-Statistics.pptx werfgvqerfwef3e
PPTX
analytical representation of data
PPTX
Hypothesis testing chi square goodness of fit test
PPTX
Anova Presentation
PPT
Measures of Central Tendancy
PPTX
Oneway ANOVA - Overview
PDF
GRADE 10 MATH MODULE THE QUADRATIC EQUATION.pdf
PPTX
Utilization-of-assessment-data-assessmentinLearning1.pptx
PPTX
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
PPTX
Analyzing experimental research data
PDF
Analyzing experimental research data
PDF
Writing up your results – apa style guidelines
PPT
Day 11 t test for independent samples
PPTX
PERCENTILES FOR GROUPED DATA AND PERCENTILE RANK.pptx
PPTX
Tabulation of Data, Frequency Distribution, Contingency table
Significant test using One Way Anova
AlsamerLagoyo-assessment for teachers education
assessment on education for ptcp for teacher
EPS 525 – Introduction to StatisticsAssignment No. 5 – One-w.docx
Analysis and interpretation of Assessment.pptx
Inferential-Statistics.pptx werfgvqerfwef3e
analytical representation of data
Hypothesis testing chi square goodness of fit test
Anova Presentation
Measures of Central Tendancy
Oneway ANOVA - Overview
GRADE 10 MATH MODULE THE QUADRATIC EQUATION.pdf
Utilization-of-assessment-data-assessmentinLearning1.pptx
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Analyzing experimental research data
Analyzing experimental research data
Writing up your results – apa style guidelines
Day 11 t test for independent samples
PERCENTILES FOR GROUPED DATA AND PERCENTILE RANK.pptx
Tabulation of Data, Frequency Distribution, Contingency table
Ad

More from Lawrence kok (20)

PDF
IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast e...
PDF
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...
PDF
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...
PDF
IA on effect of duration on the efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fun...
PDF
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...
PDF
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...
PDF
IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized MnO2 in alginate beads ...
PDF
IA on effect of concentration of sodium alginate and calcium chloride in maki...
PDF
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of white wine, using pota...
PDF
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of green tea, using potas...
PDF
IA on effect of duration (steeping time) on polyphenol (tannins) of tea, usin...
PDF
IA on polyphenol (tannins) quantification between green and black tea using p...
PDF
IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins strawberry) quantification using pot...
PDF
IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins apple cider) quantification using po...
PDF
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) quantification using pota...
PDF
IA on polyphenol quantification using potassium permanganate titration (Lowen...
PDF
IA on rate of hydrolysis of aspirin at different temperature, measured using ...
PDF
IA on hydrolysis of aspirin in water, duration over 5 days, measured using vi...
PDF
IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different HCI concentration (0.0625 -1M), measure...
PDF
IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different medium, water vs acid (1M) medium, meas...
IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast e...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (yeast extract) in alginate be...
IA on effect of duration on the efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fun...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...
IA on efficiency of immobilized enzyme amylase (fungal extract) in alginate b...
IA on effect of duration on efficiency of immobilized MnO2 in alginate beads ...
IA on effect of concentration of sodium alginate and calcium chloride in maki...
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of white wine, using pota...
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) of green tea, using potas...
IA on effect of duration (steeping time) on polyphenol (tannins) of tea, usin...
IA on polyphenol (tannins) quantification between green and black tea using p...
IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins strawberry) quantification using pot...
IA on temperature on polyphenol (tannins apple cider) quantification using po...
IA on effect of temperature on polyphenol (tannins) quantification using pota...
IA on polyphenol quantification using potassium permanganate titration (Lowen...
IA on rate of hydrolysis of aspirin at different temperature, measured using ...
IA on hydrolysis of aspirin in water, duration over 5 days, measured using vi...
IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different HCI concentration (0.0625 -1M), measure...
IA on aspirin hydrolysis in different medium, water vs acid (1M) medium, meas...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Orientation - ARALprogram of Deped to the Parents.pptx
PPTX
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx
PDF
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
Unit 4 Skeletal System.ppt.pptxopresentatiom
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PDF
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PDF
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
PPTX
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...
PPTX
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
Orientation - ARALprogram of Deped to the Parents.pptx
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
Unit 4 Skeletal System.ppt.pptxopresentatiom
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
advance database management system book.pdf
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...

Significant test using student T test

  • 1. Significant test (T-test) on average IB grades between diff IB classes. Data independent of each other.  Showing normal distribution  Minimum sample size of 15 for each data set  Similar variance Hypotheses Null Hypothesis (H0) – No significant difference between different IB classes. Alternate Hypothesis (HA) – A significant difference between different IB classes. Steps for T test 1. State the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis based on your research question 2. Set critical P level at P = 0.05 (5% by chance) 3. Perform t test and if P > 0.05 or t value < t critical, accept null hypothesis Perform t test and if P < 0.05 or t value > t critical, reject null hypothesis 4. Write your conclusion is there a significant difference between mean of two samples Procedure : 1. The average IB scores from two different IB classes were collected 2. The scores are then tabulated according to the table below. 3. The data is then processed using the formulas given for the student t-test. 4. The processed data is analyzed and a conclusion is then found.
  • 2. Data Collection Average Scores for IB Class 3 Student Score(x) Sorted Value Class Frequency Score (x2) A 4.8 4.1 4.1 – 4.5 | | 23.04 B 5.6 4.1 31.36 C 4.7 4.7 4.6 – 5.0 | | | | | | 22.09 D 5.5 4.7 30.25 E 5.3 4.8 5.1 – 5.5 | | | | 28.09 F 6.0 4.8 36.00 G 4.1 5.0 5.6 – 6.0 | | | 16.81 H 5.1 5.0 26.01 I 5.1 5.1 6.1 – 6.5 | 26.01 J 4.8 5.1 23.04 K 5.0 5.3 25.00 L 6.0 5.5 36.00 M 4.7 5.6 22.09 N 5.0 6.0 25.00 O 4.1 6.0 16.81 P 6.3 6.3 39.69 n = 16 Σx = 82.1 Σx2 = 427.29 Average Scores for IB Class 2 Student Score(x) Sorted Value Class Frequency Score (x2) A 5.4 1.4 1.0 – 1.5 | 29.16 B 4.2 3.2 17.64 C 5.5 3.4 3.1 – 3.5 | | | 30.25 D 1.4 3.5 1.96 E 5.3 4.2 4.1 – 4.5 | | | 28.09 F 5.3 4.5 28.09 G 4.5 4.5 5.1 – 5.5 | | | | 20.25 H 3.2 5.3 10.24 I 7.0 5.3 5.6 – 6.0 | | | 49.00 J 6.4 5.4 40.96 K 5.8 5.5 6.1 -6.5 | 33.64 L 3.4 5.7 11.56 M 5.7 5.8 6.6 – 7.0 | 32.49 N 3.5 5.9 12.25 O 4.5 6.4 20.25 P 5.9 7.0 34.81 n = 16 Σx = 77.4 Σx2 = 400.64
  • 3. Showing Normal Distribution for both Classes
  • 4. Detail calculation using formula Detail Calculation using Excel 1. Follow instruction shown below and choose t test equal variance 2. For variable 1 – choose range class 1, variable 2 – choose class 2
  • 5. 3. Display results from Excel t value = 0.82, t critical = 2.04 t value < t critical (0.82 < 2.04) Do no reject null hypothesis p value = 0.41 > 0.05 Conclusion and Evaluation The tvalue is less than the tcrit (0.82 < 2.04), or P value > 0.05, this shows that there is no significant difference between the two IB classes. Thus, the null hypothesis is accepted (fail to reject) over the alternative hypothesis. Significance was determined by t test and P > 0.05, there is not enough evidence to reject the Null Hypothesis, (There is no significant difference between both classes)