Smart policing and technology applications presentation
3 likes1,745 views
This document summarizes a presentation on smart policing and technology applications. It discusses a Bureau of Justice Assistance initiative that provided funding to 16 cities to implement smart policing projects using evidence-based practices, partnerships, and technology. Smart policing is presented as a new paradigm that takes a problem-solving approach using data, analysis, and technology to improve police operations in a cost-effective manner with a focus on crime prevention and measuring performance. Key aspects discussed include taking a system-wide, strategic view of policing; using science-driven, data-informed methods; place-based approaches; collaborative models; performance measurement; and analytics to enhance operations and crime prevention.
Smart policing and technology applications presentation
- 1. Smart Policing and Technology Applications Presentation at the IACP LEIM Conference San Diego, California June 15,2011 This project was supported by Grant No. 2009-DG-BX-K021 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.
- 2. BJA Smart Policing Initiative Purpose: to encourage innovation in policing practices through applications of evidence based best practices, partnerships with local universities, and incorporation of analytics and technology into operations !6 cities funded to implement projects using smart policing approaches CNA selected as technical assistance and training provider 2
- 3. A new Paradigm and Problem Solving Approach Smart Policing Paradigm – provides a conceptual framework to re-think how to organize and prioritize policing activities in more cost effective ways. Incorporates community policing, intelligent –led policing concepts Smart Policing as Problem Solving Approach- Data driven, supported by analysis, enabled by technologies, with a focus on measuring performance and adjusting accordingly 3
- 4. Smart Policing : Why now? Constrained budgets and expenditures encroaching on other interests Accountability for effective use of resources More coordination with justice and non-justice elements Building trust with growing diverse citizenry Pressure to show impact from performance Need for a new policing paradigm
- 5. Smart Policing: Why is this important to you ? Byrne Funding is now linked to implementation of evidence-based strategies State and local budget constraints require more cost effective approaches Careful thoughtful planning that focuses on SMART and evidence-based approaches may actually get you better results
- 6. Current Policing Environment Adult corrections populations Serious violent crime trends
- 7. Factors influencing outcomes Increasing percentage of offenders incarcerated Incapacitation Effect Increased police presence and improved tactics Demographics A less crime prone aging population Changing drug use trends impacting arrests and prison admissions
- 8. Challenges Federal, state and local budget deficits and recession-driven revenue shortfalls Current public safety investments can’t be sustained under existing fiscal realities A growing sophistication of criminal enterprises Increasing numbers of offenders released from prisons and jails Proliferation of regional gangs networks Unexpected spikes in serious crime
- 9. Smart Policing: A new paradigm “Effective policing requires a tightly focused approach that is measurable ,based on sound, detailed analysis, and includes policies and procedures for accountability.” System –wide and strategic view of policing and impact on other justice components and community at large. Science driven ( data, analysis, and research) to make informed decisions. Using analytics and technologies to improve police operations in a cost effective manner Crime prevention Focus
- 10. System-wide and strategic view Comprehensive planning including setting enforcement priorities, establishing performance benchmarks, alignment of resources to reflect planning and community partnerships. Community –wide public safety planning CompStat ( to establish numerical performance benchmarks) Designing and implementing initiatives that focus on preventing crimes from occurring. Crime prevention through environmental design Enhanced surveillance Coordination and information –sharing with other justice /non- justice components. Notification of high risk prisoners released Police/Probation monitoring
- 11. Science-driven data, analysis and research Incorporating evidence–based practices ( those experimentally assessed via robust social science research methods) into police operations Collaborations with non-policing agencies Placed-based Strategies Collecting and using an array of data to assess levels of crime, crime trends, suspect information as source for analysis. /Command Centers/Fusion Centers Data Centers Analysis to help drive resource allocations including hot spot identification and other strategic targeting. Crime analysis
- 12. Placed-based approaches Stems from initial “hot spots” research by Larry Sherman Determine spatial and temporal crime patterns Consider underlying reasons *Why location attracts crime * Other activities that may be driving crime Develop a strategic response including saturation enforcement
- 13. Collaborative Approaches Derived in part from evaluations of DOJ Weed and Seed and Project Safe Neighborhood programs Joint community safety planning including law enforcement and impacted community stakeholders ( not limited to prevention ) Delineation of roles and responsibilities for those participating in planning process Benchmarks and Accountability
- 14. Performance Measurement Traditional measures focus on police activity e.g. meetings attended, patrol hours, responds to call for service, arrests Outcome measures e. g. clearance rates, community surveys assessing impact, crime rates Project measures - focus on tracking implementation of project against stated benchmarks- e. g. number of organizations identified as major dealers, assets seized etc.
- 15. Using analytics and software to improve operations Advanced software that facilitates link analysis to support investigations and offender targeting COPlink LINX Advanced use of DNA and other identifiers to support investigations and solve “cold cases” CODIS DNA field evidence collection Real time analytics and surveillance technologies that map crimes, locate law enforcement personnel, and deploy assets in “real time.” GPS Advanced video surveillance
- 16. Crime Prevention Focus An enhanced deterrent via improved clearance rates and a greater certainty of punishment Enhanced surveillance of crime hot spots and supporting monitoring of high risk offenders including probationers/parolees Improved targeting of crime prevention resources to high risk groups
- 17. Smart Policing as a Problem Solving Approach Bound the problem using analysis to determine nature and extent Determine realistic expectations as to what can be achieved Use a collaborative approach and develop an implementation strategy Identify internal resources and external partners /collaborative for implementation 17
- 18. Smart Policing Problem Solving Approach (Continued) Review relevant best practices Determine how data, analytics and new technologies can contribute to implementation Specifically engage local universities to assist in data collection and program evaluation Settle on your project performance metrics Affirm leadership roles and accountability Adjust implementation strategy as required 18
- 19. Peele principles for modern policing Basic mission is to prevent crime and disorder Ability of police to perform their duties is dependent upon public approval of police actions The degree of cooperation from the public diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it Robert founded the first modern police department in London, England in 1855.