SlideShare a Scribd company logo
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)
Volume 6 Issue 6, September-October 2022 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD52246 | Volume – 6 | Issue – 6 | September-October 2022 Page 2106
Soft Lattice in Approximation Space
Payoja Mohanty
3270 Klaiman Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
ABSTRACT
Rough set theory is a powerful tool to analysis the uncertain and
imprecise problem in information systems. Also the soft set and
lattice theory can be used as a general mathematical tool for dealing
with uncertainty. In this paper, we present a new concept, soft rough
lattice where the lower and upper approximations are the sub lattices
and narrate some properties of soft rough lattice with some examples.
KEYWORDS: Rough set, soft set, lattice theory, lower approximation
and upper approximation of soft lattice
How to cite this paper: Payoja Mohanty
"Soft Lattice in Approximation Space"
Published in
International Journal
of Trend in
Scientific Research
and Development
(ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-
6470, Volume-6 |
Issue-6, October
2022, pp.2106-2108, URL:
www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd52246.pdf
Copyright © 2022 by author(s) and
International Journal of Trend in
Scientific Research and Development
Journal. This is an
Open Access article
distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
1. INTRODUCTION
Rough set theory was proposed by Prof. Z. Pawlak in
1982[7] to deal with uncertainty, vagueness and
imprecise problems. The classical rough set theory is
based on an equivalence relation that is, a knowledge
on a universe of objects U. Knowledge is based on
the ability to classify objects, and by objects we mean
anything we can think of, for example real things,
states, abstract concepts, process, moment of time etc.
For a finite set of objects U, any subset X ⊆ U will be
called a concept or a category in U and any family of
concepts in U will be referred to as knowledge about
U. Let us consider a classification or partition of a
certain universe U, that is, a family
X={ } is called a partition of U if
for , i≠j, i,j=1,2,…,n and
= U. W know that partition(or classification) of
U and an equivalence relation on U are
interchangeable notion. So we consider equivalence
relation R: U→ U instead of classification as it is easy
to manifulate.
Let R be an equivalence relation on universe U, then
U/R be the family of all equivalence classes of R
referred to as categories or concepts of R, and
denotes a category in R containing an element
x∈ U. Here R is a knowledge on U.
In 1999 D. Molodtsov[6] introduced the concept of
soft sets, which is a new mathematical tool for
dealing with uncertainty. Soft set theory has potential
applications in many different fields including game
theory, operational research, probability theory. Maji
et al[4] defined several operations on soft sets and
made a theoretical study on the theory of soft sets.
The combination of the theories soft set and rough set
be studied by Das and Mohanty[2], Mohanty et al[5]
and also by the other authors Feng et al[3].
Lattice are relatively simple structures since the basic
concepts of the theory include onlyorders, least upper
bounds, greatest lower bounds. Now the lattice plays
on important role in many disciplines of computer
sciences and engineering. Though the concept of
lattice was introduced by Pirce and Schroder, but
Boole(1930) and Birkhoff(1967)[1] gave the actual
development of lattice theory.
2. PRELIMINARIES:
Definition-2.1:[8] Let U be the universal set and C be
an equivalence relation(or knowledge) on U, where C
is termed as indiscernibility relation. U/C be family of
all equivalence class of C, known as catagories of C,
for x U. is an equivalence class of x. The
relational system K=(U,C) is called a approximation
IJTSRD52246
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD52246 | Volume – 6 | Issue – 6 | September-October 2022 Page 2107
space. The lower approximation and upper
approximation of a set X U under the indiscernibility
relation C are defined as
X={x U: } and
X={ x U: } respectively.
Example-2.2:
Let U={ } be the various colors for a
painting. Let C be the knowledge on U, we get a
partition of U as
U/C={{ }, { }, { }, { }, { }}
Where are red color, are green color,
are yellow color, color and is
blue color.
Let X={ }⊂ U. That is X certain painting the
lower and upper approximation of X are
X={ }. So yellow color certainly belong to the
painting X.
And X={ , , }. So green and yellow color
are possibly used for the painting belong to X.
Hence, X≠ X.
Therefore, the set X is rough with respect to
knowledge C.
Example-2.3:
Let U={ } be the different chocolate
in a jar according to their price. Let D be the
knowledge on U, we get a partition of U as
U/D={{ , },{ }, { }, { },
{ }}
That is { , } are the 5rupees chocolate,
{ } are the 10rupees chocolate, { } are
10rupees chocolate, { } are 30rupees chocolate
and { }is 50rupees chocolate. Let X={ , ,
}⊂ U, that is a set of chocolates are picked a
random.
The lower approximation and upper approximation of
X are
X={ }. So 20rupees and 50 rupees
chocolate are certainly belong to X.
X={ , , }. So the chocolates of 20
rupees, 30 rupees and 50rupees are possibly classified
belong to X.
Hence, X≠ X.
Therefore, the set X is rough with respect to
knowledge D.
Definition-2.4: Let U be an initial universe, E be the
set of parameters related to U. Let P(U) denotes the
power set of U, A⊆ E and F be a mapping given by
F:A →P(U), then the pair (F,A) is called soft set over
U.
Example-2.5: Let U={ } be the set of
shop, E={ } be the set of parameters on U
that is stands for flower, stands for seed,
stands for fresh, stands for stale and stands for
root vegetables. Let a mapping F:E→P(U) be given
as F( )={ , }, = { },
F( )={ }, F( )={ } and F( )={ }
means and are root vegetables.
Let A={ }⊆ E then the soft set
(F,A)={( , F( ) ), (green, ), (fresh,
F( ))}
={(cheap, { , }), (green, { }), (fresh,
{ })}
Example-2.6:
Let U={ } be different quality bikes
available in India market, E= { } be the set of
parameters on U that is stands for expensive,
stands for good mileage, stands for sports,
stands for crusier and stands for touring. Let a
mapping G:E→P(U) be given as G( )={ , }
the expensive bikes are , and , =
{ , }, G( )={ }, G( )={ , }
and G( )={ }.
Let A={ }⊆ E then the soft set
(G,A)={( , G( ) ), (good mileage,
), (cruiser, G( ))}
={(expensive, { , }), (good mileage,
{ , }), (cruiser, { , })}
Definition-2.7: Let Z=(Z,≾) be a partially
ordered set. Then Z is called a lattice if for any two
elements r and s of Z have a least upper bound r∨s
and a greatest lower bound r∧s are in Z.
Defintion-2.8: Let (L,∨,∧) be a lattice and let S⊆ L be
a subset of L. Then (S,∨,∧) is called a sublattice of
(L,∨,∧) if and only if S is closed under both
operations of join(∨) and meet(∧).
Example-2.9:
The power set P(S) is a lattice under the operation
union and intersection. That is S={⍺, }
Then P(S)={⌽,{ ⍺},{ },{ }, {⍺, }, { },
{⍺, },S}.
Let A=(P(S),⋃,∩) is a lattice.
That is { ⍺}⋃ { }={ }
{⍺}∩ { }=⌽
{ }⋃{ }={ }
{ }∩{ }= { }
B={T,⋃,∩} is sublattice of A, where T={⌽, {⍺},
{ }, {⍺, }}
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD52246 | Volume – 6 | Issue – 6 | September-October 2022 Page 2108
Example-2.10: Let A=( ,|)=
(1,2,3,4,5,6,10,12,15,20,30,60) is a lattice.
Join: 6 ∨10=lcm(6,10)=30
Meet: 6∧ 10=gcd(6,10)=2
Join: 10∨12=lcm(10,12)=60
Meet: 10∧ 12=gcd(10,12)=2
B={K, |} is a sublattice of A, where A={3,6,12}.
3. SOFT ROUGH LATTICE:
Let L be an lattice, E be the set of parameter and P(L)
denotes the set of all sublattice of L. The collection
W=(F,A) is soft lattice over L, where F is a mapping
given by F:A → P(L). Then S=(L,F,A) is called soft
lattice approximation space.
Definition-3.1: For X ⊆L, we define lower and upper
approximation as
and
If , then X is called soft rough
lattice. Otherwise X is soft definable lattice. Here,
and are sublattices.
Example-3.2: Let S={⍺, } be a set and L=(S,⊆) =
{⌽,{ ⍺},{ },{ }, {⍺, }, { }, {⍺, },S} be a
lattice. Let E={ } be the set of parameters and
D={ }. Let F: D→ P(L) be a mapping
given by F( )={{⍺},{⍺, }}, F( )={ ⌽,{⍺},{ },
{⍺, }}, F( )={{⍺},{⍺, }}, F( )= {⌽,{⍺}, S},
F( )={ { }, { } } be sublattices of L. Let
X={{⍺},{⍺, }}∈ P(L). Then {{⍺},{⍺, }}
and = {⌽,{⍺},{ },{⍺, },{⍺, },S}
Theorem-3.3:
Let W=(F,A) be soft lattice over L, S=(L,F,A) be a
soft lattice approximation space and X, Y⊆ L, we
have
A.
B.
C. X⊆ Y⇒
D. X⊆ Y⇒
Proof:
A. According to definition of soft lattice lower and
upper approximation, we have
and
B. and
C. Assume that X⊆ Y
By definition, F(a)⊆ X⇒ u∈
So, u∈ F(a)⊆ Y
Therefore,
D. Suppose that X⊆ Y
⇒
⇒ ⊇
⇒ L-
⇒
Theorem-3.4:
Let W=(F,A) be soft lattice over L, S=(L,F,A) be a
soft lattice approximation space and X, Y⊆ L, we
have
⋃
(b) ∩
(c) ⊇ ⋃
(d)
(e)
(f)
Proof:
These can be prove directly.
4. CONCLUSION:
This paper aims to define soft rough lattice which is a
new mathematical model to deal with uncertain and
vague concept. Some properties are proved. Frther
research can be made for the new model soft rough
lattice.
REFERENCES
[1] G. Birkhoff, “Lattice Theory”, Trans. Amer.
Math, Soc., New York, 1967.
[2] M. Das, D. Mohanty, “Dispensability on soft
rough set theory”, International Journal of
Engineering, Science and Mathematics,
vol.10(4), pp. 1-10, 2021.
[3] F.Feng, X. Liu, V. Leoreanu-Fotea, Y. B. Jun,
Soft sets and soft rough sets, Information
Sciences 18(2011) 1125-1137.
[4] P.K. Maji, R. Biswas, R. Roy, “Soft set
theory”, Computers and Mathematics with
Applications, vol.45, pp. 555-562, 2003.
[5] Mohanty, N. Kalia, L. Pattanayak, B.B. Nayak,
“An introduction to rough soft set”,
Mathematical Science, International Research
Journal, vol. 1(3), pp. 927-936, 2012.
[6] Molodtsov, “Soft set theory first results”,
Computers and Mathematical with
Applications, vol. 37, pp. 19-31, 1999.
[7] Z. Pawlak, “Rough set theory”, International
Journal of Computer and Information Sciences,
vol. 11, pp. 341-356, 1982.
[8] Z. Pawlak, “Rough sets-theoretical aspects of
reasoning about data”, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, 1991.

More Related Content

PDF
Fundamentals of Parameterised Covering Approximation Space
PDF
piya_new__1_ (1).pdf
PPT
Chapter 1
PDF
Rough set on concept lattice
PDF
Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (7)
PDF
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
PDF
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
PDF
IRJET- Nano Generalized Delta Semi Closed Sets in Nano Topological Spaces
Fundamentals of Parameterised Covering Approximation Space
piya_new__1_ (1).pdf
Chapter 1
Rough set on concept lattice
Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (7)
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
IRJET- Nano Generalized Delta Semi Closed Sets in Nano Topological Spaces

Similar to Soft Lattice in Approximation Space (20)

PDF
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
PDF
Rough sets and fuzzy rough sets in Decision Making
DOCX
MA500-2 Topological Structures 2016Aisling McCluskey, Dar.docx
PDF
Ow3426032607
PDF
A weaker version of continuity and a common fixed point theorem
PDF
E42012426
PPT
Unit 4 Intro to Fuzzy Logic 1VBGBGBG.ppt
PDF
Nearly Regular Topological Spaces of the First Kind and the Second Kind
PDF
Bf4101327334
PDF
International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Techno...
PDF
Generalized Neutrosophic Soft Set
PDF
Common Fixed Point Theorems in Compatible Mappings of Type (P*) of Generalize...
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
PDF
RW-CLOSED MAPS AND RW-OPEN MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
PDF
On Decomposition of Nano Continuity
PDF
K-algebras on quadripartitioned single valued neutrosophic sets
PDF
Fixed Point Results In Fuzzy Menger Space With Common Property (E.A.)
PPT
Calculus of One Variable
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
Rough sets and fuzzy rough sets in Decision Making
MA500-2 Topological Structures 2016Aisling McCluskey, Dar.docx
Ow3426032607
A weaker version of continuity and a common fixed point theorem
E42012426
Unit 4 Intro to Fuzzy Logic 1VBGBGBG.ppt
Nearly Regular Topological Spaces of the First Kind and the Second Kind
Bf4101327334
International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Techno...
Generalized Neutrosophic Soft Set
Common Fixed Point Theorems in Compatible Mappings of Type (P*) of Generalize...
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
RW-CLOSED MAPS AND RW-OPEN MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
On Decomposition of Nano Continuity
K-algebras on quadripartitioned single valued neutrosophic sets
Fixed Point Results In Fuzzy Menger Space With Common Property (E.A.)
Calculus of One Variable
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
Ad

More from ijtsrd (20)

PDF
A Study of School Dropout in Rural Districts of Darjeeling and Its Causes
PDF
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Soybean Technologies in Fedis D...
PDF
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Potato Technologies in Selected...
PDF
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Animal Drawn Potato Digger in S...
PDF
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Drought Tolerant and Early Matu...
PDF
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Double Cropping Practice Legume...
PDF
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Common Bean Technology in Low L...
PDF
Enhancing Image Quality in Compression and Fading Channels A Wavelet Based Ap...
PDF
Manpower Training and Employee Performance in Mellienium Ltdawka, Anambra State
PDF
A Statistical Analysis on the Growth Rate of Selected Sectors of Nigerian Eco...
PDF
Automatic Accident Detection and Emergency Alert System using IoT
PDF
Corporate Social Responsibility Dimensions and Corporate Image of Selected Up...
PDF
The Role of Media in Tribal Health and Educational Progress of Odisha
PDF
Advancements and Future Trends in Advanced Quantum Algorithms A Prompt Scienc...
PDF
A Study on Seismic Analysis of High Rise Building with Mass Irregularities, T...
PDF
Descriptive Study to Assess the Knowledge of B.Sc. Interns Regarding Biomedic...
PDF
Performance of Grid Connected Solar PV Power Plant at Clear Sky Day
PDF
Vitiligo Treated Homoeopathically A Case Report
PDF
Vitiligo Treated Homoeopathically A Case Report
PDF
Uterine Fibroids Homoeopathic Perspectives
A Study of School Dropout in Rural Districts of Darjeeling and Its Causes
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Soybean Technologies in Fedis D...
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Potato Technologies in Selected...
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Animal Drawn Potato Digger in S...
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Drought Tolerant and Early Matu...
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Double Cropping Practice Legume...
Pre extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Common Bean Technology in Low L...
Enhancing Image Quality in Compression and Fading Channels A Wavelet Based Ap...
Manpower Training and Employee Performance in Mellienium Ltdawka, Anambra State
A Statistical Analysis on the Growth Rate of Selected Sectors of Nigerian Eco...
Automatic Accident Detection and Emergency Alert System using IoT
Corporate Social Responsibility Dimensions and Corporate Image of Selected Up...
The Role of Media in Tribal Health and Educational Progress of Odisha
Advancements and Future Trends in Advanced Quantum Algorithms A Prompt Scienc...
A Study on Seismic Analysis of High Rise Building with Mass Irregularities, T...
Descriptive Study to Assess the Knowledge of B.Sc. Interns Regarding Biomedic...
Performance of Grid Connected Solar PV Power Plant at Clear Sky Day
Vitiligo Treated Homoeopathically A Case Report
Vitiligo Treated Homoeopathically A Case Report
Uterine Fibroids Homoeopathic Perspectives
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
PPT- ENG7_QUARTER1_LESSON1_WEEK1. IMAGERY -DESCRIPTIONS pptx.pptx
PPTX
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
PDF
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
PPTX
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PDF
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
PPTX
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PDF
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
PDF
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
PPTX
Presentation on HIE in infants and its manifestations
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPT- ENG7_QUARTER1_LESSON1_WEEK1. IMAGERY -DESCRIPTIONS pptx.pptx
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
master seminar digital applications in india
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
Presentation on HIE in infants and its manifestations

Soft Lattice in Approximation Space

  • 1. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) Volume 6 Issue 6, September-October 2022 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470 @ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD52246 | Volume – 6 | Issue – 6 | September-October 2022 Page 2106 Soft Lattice in Approximation Space Payoja Mohanty 3270 Klaiman Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada ABSTRACT Rough set theory is a powerful tool to analysis the uncertain and imprecise problem in information systems. Also the soft set and lattice theory can be used as a general mathematical tool for dealing with uncertainty. In this paper, we present a new concept, soft rough lattice where the lower and upper approximations are the sub lattices and narrate some properties of soft rough lattice with some examples. KEYWORDS: Rough set, soft set, lattice theory, lower approximation and upper approximation of soft lattice How to cite this paper: Payoja Mohanty "Soft Lattice in Approximation Space" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456- 6470, Volume-6 | Issue-6, October 2022, pp.2106-2108, URL: www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd52246.pdf Copyright © 2022 by author(s) and International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development Journal. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) 1. INTRODUCTION Rough set theory was proposed by Prof. Z. Pawlak in 1982[7] to deal with uncertainty, vagueness and imprecise problems. The classical rough set theory is based on an equivalence relation that is, a knowledge on a universe of objects U. Knowledge is based on the ability to classify objects, and by objects we mean anything we can think of, for example real things, states, abstract concepts, process, moment of time etc. For a finite set of objects U, any subset X ⊆ U will be called a concept or a category in U and any family of concepts in U will be referred to as knowledge about U. Let us consider a classification or partition of a certain universe U, that is, a family X={ } is called a partition of U if for , i≠j, i,j=1,2,…,n and = U. W know that partition(or classification) of U and an equivalence relation on U are interchangeable notion. So we consider equivalence relation R: U→ U instead of classification as it is easy to manifulate. Let R be an equivalence relation on universe U, then U/R be the family of all equivalence classes of R referred to as categories or concepts of R, and denotes a category in R containing an element x∈ U. Here R is a knowledge on U. In 1999 D. Molodtsov[6] introduced the concept of soft sets, which is a new mathematical tool for dealing with uncertainty. Soft set theory has potential applications in many different fields including game theory, operational research, probability theory. Maji et al[4] defined several operations on soft sets and made a theoretical study on the theory of soft sets. The combination of the theories soft set and rough set be studied by Das and Mohanty[2], Mohanty et al[5] and also by the other authors Feng et al[3]. Lattice are relatively simple structures since the basic concepts of the theory include onlyorders, least upper bounds, greatest lower bounds. Now the lattice plays on important role in many disciplines of computer sciences and engineering. Though the concept of lattice was introduced by Pirce and Schroder, but Boole(1930) and Birkhoff(1967)[1] gave the actual development of lattice theory. 2. PRELIMINARIES: Definition-2.1:[8] Let U be the universal set and C be an equivalence relation(or knowledge) on U, where C is termed as indiscernibility relation. U/C be family of all equivalence class of C, known as catagories of C, for x U. is an equivalence class of x. The relational system K=(U,C) is called a approximation IJTSRD52246
  • 2. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470 @ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD52246 | Volume – 6 | Issue – 6 | September-October 2022 Page 2107 space. The lower approximation and upper approximation of a set X U under the indiscernibility relation C are defined as X={x U: } and X={ x U: } respectively. Example-2.2: Let U={ } be the various colors for a painting. Let C be the knowledge on U, we get a partition of U as U/C={{ }, { }, { }, { }, { }} Where are red color, are green color, are yellow color, color and is blue color. Let X={ }⊂ U. That is X certain painting the lower and upper approximation of X are X={ }. So yellow color certainly belong to the painting X. And X={ , , }. So green and yellow color are possibly used for the painting belong to X. Hence, X≠ X. Therefore, the set X is rough with respect to knowledge C. Example-2.3: Let U={ } be the different chocolate in a jar according to their price. Let D be the knowledge on U, we get a partition of U as U/D={{ , },{ }, { }, { }, { }} That is { , } are the 5rupees chocolate, { } are the 10rupees chocolate, { } are 10rupees chocolate, { } are 30rupees chocolate and { }is 50rupees chocolate. Let X={ , , }⊂ U, that is a set of chocolates are picked a random. The lower approximation and upper approximation of X are X={ }. So 20rupees and 50 rupees chocolate are certainly belong to X. X={ , , }. So the chocolates of 20 rupees, 30 rupees and 50rupees are possibly classified belong to X. Hence, X≠ X. Therefore, the set X is rough with respect to knowledge D. Definition-2.4: Let U be an initial universe, E be the set of parameters related to U. Let P(U) denotes the power set of U, A⊆ E and F be a mapping given by F:A →P(U), then the pair (F,A) is called soft set over U. Example-2.5: Let U={ } be the set of shop, E={ } be the set of parameters on U that is stands for flower, stands for seed, stands for fresh, stands for stale and stands for root vegetables. Let a mapping F:E→P(U) be given as F( )={ , }, = { }, F( )={ }, F( )={ } and F( )={ } means and are root vegetables. Let A={ }⊆ E then the soft set (F,A)={( , F( ) ), (green, ), (fresh, F( ))} ={(cheap, { , }), (green, { }), (fresh, { })} Example-2.6: Let U={ } be different quality bikes available in India market, E= { } be the set of parameters on U that is stands for expensive, stands for good mileage, stands for sports, stands for crusier and stands for touring. Let a mapping G:E→P(U) be given as G( )={ , } the expensive bikes are , and , = { , }, G( )={ }, G( )={ , } and G( )={ }. Let A={ }⊆ E then the soft set (G,A)={( , G( ) ), (good mileage, ), (cruiser, G( ))} ={(expensive, { , }), (good mileage, { , }), (cruiser, { , })} Definition-2.7: Let Z=(Z,≾) be a partially ordered set. Then Z is called a lattice if for any two elements r and s of Z have a least upper bound r∨s and a greatest lower bound r∧s are in Z. Defintion-2.8: Let (L,∨,∧) be a lattice and let S⊆ L be a subset of L. Then (S,∨,∧) is called a sublattice of (L,∨,∧) if and only if S is closed under both operations of join(∨) and meet(∧). Example-2.9: The power set P(S) is a lattice under the operation union and intersection. That is S={⍺, } Then P(S)={⌽,{ ⍺},{ },{ }, {⍺, }, { }, {⍺, },S}. Let A=(P(S),⋃,∩) is a lattice. That is { ⍺}⋃ { }={ } {⍺}∩ { }=⌽ { }⋃{ }={ } { }∩{ }= { } B={T,⋃,∩} is sublattice of A, where T={⌽, {⍺}, { }, {⍺, }}
  • 3. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470 @ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD52246 | Volume – 6 | Issue – 6 | September-October 2022 Page 2108 Example-2.10: Let A=( ,|)= (1,2,3,4,5,6,10,12,15,20,30,60) is a lattice. Join: 6 ∨10=lcm(6,10)=30 Meet: 6∧ 10=gcd(6,10)=2 Join: 10∨12=lcm(10,12)=60 Meet: 10∧ 12=gcd(10,12)=2 B={K, |} is a sublattice of A, where A={3,6,12}. 3. SOFT ROUGH LATTICE: Let L be an lattice, E be the set of parameter and P(L) denotes the set of all sublattice of L. The collection W=(F,A) is soft lattice over L, where F is a mapping given by F:A → P(L). Then S=(L,F,A) is called soft lattice approximation space. Definition-3.1: For X ⊆L, we define lower and upper approximation as and If , then X is called soft rough lattice. Otherwise X is soft definable lattice. Here, and are sublattices. Example-3.2: Let S={⍺, } be a set and L=(S,⊆) = {⌽,{ ⍺},{ },{ }, {⍺, }, { }, {⍺, },S} be a lattice. Let E={ } be the set of parameters and D={ }. Let F: D→ P(L) be a mapping given by F( )={{⍺},{⍺, }}, F( )={ ⌽,{⍺},{ }, {⍺, }}, F( )={{⍺},{⍺, }}, F( )= {⌽,{⍺}, S}, F( )={ { }, { } } be sublattices of L. Let X={{⍺},{⍺, }}∈ P(L). Then {{⍺},{⍺, }} and = {⌽,{⍺},{ },{⍺, },{⍺, },S} Theorem-3.3: Let W=(F,A) be soft lattice over L, S=(L,F,A) be a soft lattice approximation space and X, Y⊆ L, we have A. B. C. X⊆ Y⇒ D. X⊆ Y⇒ Proof: A. According to definition of soft lattice lower and upper approximation, we have and B. and C. Assume that X⊆ Y By definition, F(a)⊆ X⇒ u∈ So, u∈ F(a)⊆ Y Therefore, D. Suppose that X⊆ Y ⇒ ⇒ ⊇ ⇒ L- ⇒ Theorem-3.4: Let W=(F,A) be soft lattice over L, S=(L,F,A) be a soft lattice approximation space and X, Y⊆ L, we have ⋃ (b) ∩ (c) ⊇ ⋃ (d) (e) (f) Proof: These can be prove directly. 4. CONCLUSION: This paper aims to define soft rough lattice which is a new mathematical model to deal with uncertain and vague concept. Some properties are proved. Frther research can be made for the new model soft rough lattice. REFERENCES [1] G. Birkhoff, “Lattice Theory”, Trans. Amer. Math, Soc., New York, 1967. [2] M. Das, D. Mohanty, “Dispensability on soft rough set theory”, International Journal of Engineering, Science and Mathematics, vol.10(4), pp. 1-10, 2021. [3] F.Feng, X. Liu, V. Leoreanu-Fotea, Y. B. Jun, Soft sets and soft rough sets, Information Sciences 18(2011) 1125-1137. [4] P.K. Maji, R. Biswas, R. Roy, “Soft set theory”, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol.45, pp. 555-562, 2003. [5] Mohanty, N. Kalia, L. Pattanayak, B.B. Nayak, “An introduction to rough soft set”, Mathematical Science, International Research Journal, vol. 1(3), pp. 927-936, 2012. [6] Molodtsov, “Soft set theory first results”, Computers and Mathematical with Applications, vol. 37, pp. 19-31, 1999. [7] Z. Pawlak, “Rough set theory”, International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 11, pp. 341-356, 1982. [8] Z. Pawlak, “Rough sets-theoretical aspects of reasoning about data”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.