Solution
Week 65 (12/8/03)
Relativistic cart
Ground frame (your frame): In your frame, the force at your feet is responsible
for changing the momentum of the cart-plus-sand-inside system. Let’s label this
system as “C”.
To find the dp/dt of C, let’s determine how fast the mass of C increases. We
claim that the rate of mass increase is γσ. This can be seen as follows. Assume
that C has a mass M at a given time. A mass σ dt falls into the cart during a time
dt. The energy of the resulting C is γM + σ dt (we’ll drop the c’s here), while the
momentum is still γMv. Using E2 = p2 + m2, we see that the resulting mass equals
M = (γM + σ dt)2 − (γMv)2 ≈ M2 + 2γMσ dt, (1)
where we have dropped the second-order dt2 terms. Using the Taylor series
√
1 + ≈
1 + /2, we may approximate M as
M ≈ M 1 +
2γσ dt
M
≈ M 1 +
γσ dt
M
= M + γσ dt. (2)
Therefore, C’s mass increases at a rate γσ.1 Intuitively, this rate of increase must
certainly be greater than the nonrelativistic result of “σ”, because heat is generated
during the collision, and this heat shows up as mass in the final object.
Having found the rate at which the mass increases, we see that the rate at which
the momentum increases is (using the fact that v is constant)
dp
dt
= γ
dM
dt
v = γ(γσ)v = γ2
σv. (3)
Since F = dp/dt, this is the force that you exert on the cart. Therefore, it is also
the force that the ground exerts on your feet (because the net force on you is zero).
Cart frame: The sand-entering-cart events happen at the same location in the
ground frame, so time dilation says that the sand enters the cart at a slower rate
in the cart frame; that is, at a rate σ/γ. The sand flies in at speed v, and then
eventually comes at rest on the cart, so its momentum decreases at a rate γ(σ/γ)v =
σv. This is the force that your hand applies to the cart.
If this were the only change in momentum in the problem, then we would have
a problem, because the force on your feet would be σv in the cart frame, whereas
we found above that it is γ2σv in the ground frame. This would contradict the fact
that longitudinal forces are the same in different frames. What is the resolution of
this apparent paradox?
1
This result is easier to see if we work in the frame where C is at rest. In this frame, a mass σ dt
comes flying in with energy γσ dt, and essentially all of this energy shows up as mass (heat) in the
final object. That is, essentially none of it shows up as overall kinetic energy of the object, which
is a general result for when a small object hits a stationary large object.
1
The resolution is that while you are pushing on the cart, your mass is decreasing.
You are moving with speed v in the cart frame, and mass is continually being
transferred from you (who are moving) to the cart (which is at rest). This is the
missing change in momentum we need. Let’s be quantitative about this.
Go back to the ground frame for a moment. We found above that the mass of
C increases at rate γσ in the ground frame. Therefore, the energy of C increases at
a rate γ(γσ) in the ground frame. The sand provides σ of this energy, so you must
provide the remaining (γ2 − 1)σ part. Therefore, since you are losing energy at this
rate, you must also be losing mass at this rate in the ground frame (because you are
at rest there).
Now go back to the cart frame. Due to time dilation, you lose mass at a rate
of only (γ2 − 1)σ/γ. This mass goes from moving at speed v (that is, along with
you), to speed zero (that is, at rest on the cart). Therefore, the rate of decrease in
momentum of this mass is γ((γ2 − 1)σ/γ)v = (γ2 − 1)σv.
Adding this result to the σv result due to the sand, we see that the total rate of
decrease in momentum is γ2σv. This is therefore the force that the ground applies
to your feet, in agreement with the calculation in the ground frame.
2

More Related Content

PPT
1D Kinematics Notes
PDF
P13 018
PPT
2D Kinematics Notes
PPTX
Gravitationalfield
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #25: Coulomb EP Theory - Numericals]
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #2: Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria]
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #24: Coulomb EP Theory]
1D Kinematics Notes
P13 018
2D Kinematics Notes
Gravitationalfield
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #25: Coulomb EP Theory - Numericals]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #2: Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #24: Coulomb EP Theory]

What's hot (20)

PPT
Lar calc10 ch02_sec2
PPTX
FLOW OVER-INCLINED FLAT PLATE govind ram jat
PPTX
Work, Energy and Power
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #4: Unconfined Compression Test]
PPT
Acceleration
PPTX
Question and Answers on Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory (usefulsearch.org)...
PPT
Lateral Earth pressure
PDF
Aplicaciones de las leyes de newton.docx
PPTX
Free fall
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #27: Infinite Slope Stability Analysis]
PPTX
9th std sci-gravitation_ppt.17-18
PDF
Solution to first semester soil 2015 16
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]
PPTX
Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...
PPT
Lecture09
PPT
Momentum ccp
PPT
Lecture08
PPTX
Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #3: Direct Shear Test)
Lar calc10 ch02_sec2
FLOW OVER-INCLINED FLAT PLATE govind ram jat
Work, Energy and Power
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #4: Unconfined Compression Test]
Acceleration
Question and Answers on Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory (usefulsearch.org)...
Lateral Earth pressure
Aplicaciones de las leyes de newton.docx
Free fall
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #27: Infinite Slope Stability Analysis]
9th std sci-gravitation_ppt.17-18
Solution to first semester soil 2015 16
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]
Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...
Lecture09
Momentum ccp
Lecture08
Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #3: Direct Shear Test)
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Información
PPTX
Camila
PDF
George s clason-el_hombre_mas_rico_de_babylonia
DOCX
The lumiere legacy assignment two b
Ad

Similar to Sol65 (8)

PPT
special relativity
PPTX
Theory of Relativity
DOC
Relativity Concepts
PPT
Lect28 handout
ODP
1.5.1 einstein and relativity
PPTX
Classical mechanics
PDF
Relativity in Easy Steps - A Primer for Amateur Scientists
PPT
Ppa6 Concep Tests Ch 07
special relativity
Theory of Relativity
Relativity Concepts
Lect28 handout
1.5.1 einstein and relativity
Classical mechanics
Relativity in Easy Steps - A Primer for Amateur Scientists
Ppa6 Concep Tests Ch 07

More from eli priyatna laidan (20)

PDF
Up ppg daljab latihan soal-pgsd-set-2
PDF
Soal utn plus kunci gurusd.net
DOC
Soal up sosial kepribadian pendidik 5
DOCX
Soal up sosial kepribadian pendidik 4
DOCX
Soal up sosial kepribadian pendidik 3
DOCX
Soal up sosial kepribadian pendidik 2
DOCX
Soal up sosial kepribadian pendidik 1
DOCX
Soal up akmal
DOCX
Soal tkp serta kunci jawabannya
DOCX
Soal tes wawasan kebangsaan
PDF
Soal sospri ukm ulang i 2017 1 (1)
DOCX
Soal perkembangan kognitif peserta didik
DOCX
Soal latihan utn pedagogik plpg 2017
PDF
Rekap soal kompetensi pedagogi
PDF
Bank soal pedagogik terbaru 175 soal-v2
PDF
Bank soal ppg
PDF
Soal cpns-paket-17
PDF
Soal cpns-paket-14
PDF
Soal cpns-paket-13
PDF
Soal cpns-paket-12
Up ppg daljab latihan soal-pgsd-set-2
Soal utn plus kunci gurusd.net
Soal up sosial kepribadian pendidik 5
Soal up sosial kepribadian pendidik 4
Soal up sosial kepribadian pendidik 3
Soal up sosial kepribadian pendidik 2
Soal up sosial kepribadian pendidik 1
Soal up akmal
Soal tkp serta kunci jawabannya
Soal tes wawasan kebangsaan
Soal sospri ukm ulang i 2017 1 (1)
Soal perkembangan kognitif peserta didik
Soal latihan utn pedagogik plpg 2017
Rekap soal kompetensi pedagogi
Bank soal pedagogik terbaru 175 soal-v2
Bank soal ppg
Soal cpns-paket-17
Soal cpns-paket-14
Soal cpns-paket-13
Soal cpns-paket-12

Sol65

  • 1. Solution Week 65 (12/8/03) Relativistic cart Ground frame (your frame): In your frame, the force at your feet is responsible for changing the momentum of the cart-plus-sand-inside system. Let’s label this system as “C”. To find the dp/dt of C, let’s determine how fast the mass of C increases. We claim that the rate of mass increase is γσ. This can be seen as follows. Assume that C has a mass M at a given time. A mass σ dt falls into the cart during a time dt. The energy of the resulting C is γM + σ dt (we’ll drop the c’s here), while the momentum is still γMv. Using E2 = p2 + m2, we see that the resulting mass equals M = (γM + σ dt)2 − (γMv)2 ≈ M2 + 2γMσ dt, (1) where we have dropped the second-order dt2 terms. Using the Taylor series √ 1 + ≈ 1 + /2, we may approximate M as M ≈ M 1 + 2γσ dt M ≈ M 1 + γσ dt M = M + γσ dt. (2) Therefore, C’s mass increases at a rate γσ.1 Intuitively, this rate of increase must certainly be greater than the nonrelativistic result of “σ”, because heat is generated during the collision, and this heat shows up as mass in the final object. Having found the rate at which the mass increases, we see that the rate at which the momentum increases is (using the fact that v is constant) dp dt = γ dM dt v = γ(γσ)v = γ2 σv. (3) Since F = dp/dt, this is the force that you exert on the cart. Therefore, it is also the force that the ground exerts on your feet (because the net force on you is zero). Cart frame: The sand-entering-cart events happen at the same location in the ground frame, so time dilation says that the sand enters the cart at a slower rate in the cart frame; that is, at a rate σ/γ. The sand flies in at speed v, and then eventually comes at rest on the cart, so its momentum decreases at a rate γ(σ/γ)v = σv. This is the force that your hand applies to the cart. If this were the only change in momentum in the problem, then we would have a problem, because the force on your feet would be σv in the cart frame, whereas we found above that it is γ2σv in the ground frame. This would contradict the fact that longitudinal forces are the same in different frames. What is the resolution of this apparent paradox? 1 This result is easier to see if we work in the frame where C is at rest. In this frame, a mass σ dt comes flying in with energy γσ dt, and essentially all of this energy shows up as mass (heat) in the final object. That is, essentially none of it shows up as overall kinetic energy of the object, which is a general result for when a small object hits a stationary large object. 1
  • 2. The resolution is that while you are pushing on the cart, your mass is decreasing. You are moving with speed v in the cart frame, and mass is continually being transferred from you (who are moving) to the cart (which is at rest). This is the missing change in momentum we need. Let’s be quantitative about this. Go back to the ground frame for a moment. We found above that the mass of C increases at rate γσ in the ground frame. Therefore, the energy of C increases at a rate γ(γσ) in the ground frame. The sand provides σ of this energy, so you must provide the remaining (γ2 − 1)σ part. Therefore, since you are losing energy at this rate, you must also be losing mass at this rate in the ground frame (because you are at rest there). Now go back to the cart frame. Due to time dilation, you lose mass at a rate of only (γ2 − 1)σ/γ. This mass goes from moving at speed v (that is, along with you), to speed zero (that is, at rest on the cart). Therefore, the rate of decrease in momentum of this mass is γ((γ2 − 1)σ/γ)v = (γ2 − 1)σv. Adding this result to the σv result due to the sand, we see that the total rate of decrease in momentum is γ2σv. This is therefore the force that the ground applies to your feet, in agreement with the calculation in the ground frame. 2