SlideShare a Scribd company logo
763312A QUANTUM MECHANICS I - solution set 3 - autumn 2012
1. Time Derivative of Momentum Expectation Value
A particle moves in a potential V = V (x). Show that the quantum mechanical
expectation values satisfy
d
dt
px = −
∂V
∂x
where px = −i ∂
∂x is the momentum operator in the x-direction.
Solution
In the lecture notes it was shown that d
dt r = p
m . Here we will proceed in an
analogous manner. First we note that
d
dt
px =
d
dt
ψ∗
pxψ dV
=
∂ψ∗
∂t
pxψ + ψ∗
px
∂ψ
∂t
dV
= −i
∂ψ∗
∂t
∂ψ
∂x
− ψ∗ ∂2
ψ
∂x∂t
dV, (1.1)
where the integral is taken over all space. The time evolution of a wave function
is governed by the Schr¨odinger equation. That is say,
−
2
2m
2
ψ + V ψ = i
∂ψ
∂t
. (1.2)
Therefore
−
2
2m
2
ψ∗
+ V ψ∗
= −i
∂ψ∗
∂t
(1.3)
and
−
2
2m
2 ∂ψ
∂x
+
∂V
∂x
ψ + V
∂ψ
∂x
= i
∂2
ψ
∂x∂t
. (1.4)
As we substitute Eqs. (1.3) and (1.4) into Eq. (1.1), we obtain
d
dt
px = −
2
2m
2
ψ
∗
+ V ψ
∗ ∂ψ
∂x
+ ψ
∗
2
2m
2 ∂ψ
∂x
−
∂V
∂x
ψ − V
∂ψ
∂x
dV
=
2
2m
ψ
∗ 2 ∂ψ
∂x
−
∂ψ
∂x
2
ψ
∗
dV − ψ
∗ ∂V
∂x
ψ dV
=
2
2m
ψ
∗ 2 ∂ψ
∂x
−
∂ψ
∂x
2
ψ
∗
dV −
∂V
∂x
. (1.5)
1
Now we have to show that the first term at the last line vanishes. For that
purpose, we state the identities
· ψ∗ ∂ψ
∂x
= ψ∗
·
∂ψ
∂x
+ ψ∗ 2 ∂ψ
∂x
, (1.6)
·
∂ψ
∂x
ψ∗
=
∂ψ
∂x
· ψ∗
+
∂ψ
∂x
2
ψ∗
. (1.7)
By employing these identities and the divergence theorem, we obtain
ψ∗ 2 ∂ψ
∂x
−
∂ψ
∂x
2
ψ∗
dV = · ψ∗ ∂ψ
∂x
−
∂ψ
∂x
ψ∗
dV
= ψ∗ ∂ψ
∂x
−
∂ψ
∂x
ψ∗
· d ¯A. (1.8)
If this surface integral vanishes, our result is proved.
2
2. Infinite Potential Well
Let us consider a particle in an infinite potential well. Calculate the expectation
value of its
a) kinetic energy,
b) potential energy.
Solution
In the lecture notes, we solved the time-independent Schr¨odinger equation for
a particle in an infinite potential well. We found out that the energy eigenfunc-
tions are
un(x) =
2
a sin nπ
a x 0 < x < a,
0 otherwise,
(2.1)
where n ∈ {1, 2, 3, · · · }. Let us now calculate the expectation value of kinetic
energy for the nth energy eigenfunction. We obtain
un|T|un =
∞
−∞
u∗
n(x)Tun(x) dx (2.2)
=
a
0
u∗
n(x)Tun(x) dx,
where the last equality follows from the fact that un(x) vanishes if x /∈ (0, a).
On the other hand, if x ∈ (0, a),
Tun(x) = −
2
2m
∂2
∂x2
2
a
sin
nπ
a
x
=
2
2m
n2
π2
a2
2
a
sin
nπ
a
x
=
2
2m
n2
π2
a2
un(x). (2.3)
Thus
un|T|un =
2
2m
n2
π2
a2
a
0
u∗
n(x)un(x) dx. (2.4)
We recall that we have normalized the functions un(x) (cf. lecture notes). Thus
the integral at the right-hand side is equal to unity. It immediately follows that
un|T|un =
n2
π2 2
2ma2
. (2.5)
3
The expectation value of potential energy is
un|V |un =
∞
−∞
u∗
n(x)V (x)un(x) dx
=
0
−∞
u∗
n(x)V (x)un(x) dx +
a
0
u∗
n(x)V (x)un(x) dx
+
∞
0
u∗
n(x)V (x)un(x) dx. (2.6)
The second integral vanishes because V (x) = 0 when x ∈ (0, a). However, both
the first and the last integral are undefined because the integrands are undefined
(the integrands are of the form ∞·0·∞). However, when we consider the infinite
potential well as a limiting case of the finite potential well, we obtain the result
that there is no contribution to the expectation value of potential energy from
the outside of the well 1
. Therefore we set the first and the last integral equal
to zero. We obtain the result that the expectation value of potential energy
vanishes. That is,
un|V |un = 0. (2.7)
1You may want to return to this point after the finite potential well has been discussed in
the lectures.
4
3. An Eigenvalue Problem
Let us consider the eigenvalue equation
ˆAu = λu, ˆA = −
d2
dx2
,
under the boundary condition u(−a) = u(a) = 0 (a is a positive real number).
Determine those eigenfunctions u that correspond to a positive eigenvalue λ .
Solution
Our eigenvalue equation
−
d2
dx2
u = λu (3.1)
is a second order homogeneous equation with constant coefficients. The associ-
ated auxiliary equation reads
r2
= −λ. (3.2)
The roots of the auxiliary equation are
r1 = i
√
λ,
r2 = −i
√
λ. (3.3)
The general solution
u(x) = C1er1x
+ C2er2x
= C1ei
√
λx
+ C2e−i
√
λx
= C1 cos
√
λx + i sin
√
λx + C2 cos
√
λx − i sin
√
λx
= A cos
√
λx + B sin
√
λx. (3.4)
Let us next consider the solutions we obtain for certain values of A and B.
A = 0 and B = 0
We obtain the zero function, which is not considered to be an eigenfunction.
A ∈ C arbitrary and B = 0
For the resulting eigenfunctions u(x) = A cos
√
λx the boundary conditions read
cos
√
λa = 0. (3.5)
This implies that
√
λa =
π
2
+ nπ ⇐⇒ λ =
π2
4a2
(1 + 2n)
2
. (3.6)
5
A = 0 and B ∈ C arbitrary
For the resulting eigenfunctions u(x) = B sin
√
λx the boundary conditions read
sin
√
λa = 0. (3.7)
This implies that
√
λa = nπ ⇐⇒ λ =
π2
a2
n2
. (3.8)
A = 0 and B = 0
It is only a minor task to show that the eigenvalues must now be of the form
(3.6) and of the form (3.8). Therefore we have to find out whether there are
n1, n2 ∈ {1, 2, 3, · · · } satisfying
π2
4a2
(1 + 2n1)2
=
π2
a2
n2
2 ⇐⇒ 1 + 2n1 = 2n2. (3.9)
We see that the left-hand side is odd for all n1, whereas the right-hand side is
even for all n2. Therefore there are no eigenvalues that are of the form (3.6)
and of the form (3.8).
Summary
The eigenvalues λn and the corresponding eigenfunctions un:
λn = π2
4a2 (1 + 2n)
2
: un(x) = A cos
√
λnx,
λn = π2
a2 n2
: un(x) = B sin
√
λnx.
6
4. Scattering From a Potential Step
Particles scatter from a potential step. Show that from the conservation of the
probability current it follows that the reflection and transmission coefficients R
and T satisfy the condition
R + T = 1.
Solution
In the lecture notes the probability currents outside and inside the potential
step are denoted by SI and SII, respectively. Furthermore, SI is divided into
two parts, namely into currents towards the positive and negative x-axis. Math-
ematically,
SI = S+
I + S−
I . (4.1)
Similarly, we divide SII into currents towards the positive and negative x-axis:
SII = S+
II + S−
II. (4.2)
When the energy of the particle is greater than the step height, there is no
probability flow towards the negative x-axis inside the step. On the other hand,
when the energy of the particle is smaller than the step height, there is no prob-
ability flow to either direction deep inside the step (near the surface the flows
to opposite directions cancel out resulting in a zero net flow). To summarize,
in both cases deep inside the step
SII = S+
II. (4.3)
Let us denote the incoming, reflected and transmitted intensities by I+
I , I−
I
and I+
II, respectively. In terms of these intensities, the reflection and transmis-
sion coefficients are
R =
I−
I
I+
I
and T =
I+
II
I+
I
, (4.4)
respectively. On the other hand,
I+
I = N|S+
I |, I−
I = N|S−
I |, I+
II = N|S+
II|, (4.5)
where N is the density of the incoming particles and the probability current
densities are measured far away from the step (at the so called asymptotical
regions mentioned in the lecture notes).
The conservation of probability reads
SI = SII. (4.6)
7
Now
R + T =
I−
I
I+
I
+
I+
II
I+
I
=
N|S−
I |
N|S+
I |
+
N|S+
II|
N|S+
I |
=
−S−
I + SII
S+
I
, (4.7)
where the last equality holds because we consider S+
II to be measured deep inside
the step [cf. Eq. (4.3)]. By using the conservation of probability [Eq. (4.6)], we
obtain
R + T =
−S−
I + S+
I + S−
I
S+
I
= 1. (4.8)
8
5. Scattering From a Potential Step Revisited
A particle scatters from a potential step of height V0. The energy of the particle
E < V0.
a) Show that the probability current inside the potential step vanishes.
b) Show that total reflection happens.
c) Estimate the penetration depth by evaluating x inside the step.
d) Show that there is a phase shift between the incoming and scattered wave.
e) Study the behavior of the probability density outside the potential step.
Solution
a) If the total energy E of the particle is lower than the step height V0, the
wave function is exponentially decaying inside the potential step. To be more
precise,
uII(x) = Ce−hx
, (5.1)
where
h = −iκ
=
2m(V0 − E)
2
. (5.2)
Inside the potential step the probability density current
S(x) =
m
Im uII(x)∗ duII
dx
(x)
=
m
Im C∗
e−hx
−hCe−hx
=
m
Im −|C|2
he−2hx
real
= 0. (5.3)
b) We have total reflection if the reflection coefficient R = 1. On the other
hand, it was pointed out in the lecture notes that
R =
B
A
2
, (5.4)
where B and A are the amplitudes of the scattered and incoming waves, re-
spectively. Moreover, we chose A=1 and obtained B = e−2iθ
. As we substitute
these into the previous equation, we obtain
R = 1. (5.5)
That is to say, total reflection happens.
9
c) Here we indeed assume that the particle is inside the potential step. Thus
the wave function associated with the particle is uII(x) = 2 cos θe−hx
e−iθ
. As
always, it has to be normalized before calculating expectation values. The
normalization factor
N =
∞
0
|uII(x)|2
dx
= 4 cos2
θ
∞
0
e−2hx
dx
=
2 cos2
θ
h
. (5.6)
Now
x =
1
N
∞
0
uII(x)∗
xuII(x) dx
= 2h
∞
0
xe−2hx
dx
=
1
2h
=
1
2
2
2m(V0 − E)
. (5.7)
d)
Figure 1: Schematic picture of k + ih in the complex plane.
Let us present the wave function in two parts (just like before). The parts
outside and inside the step are
uI(x) = eikx
+ Be−ikx
, (5.8)
uII(x) = Ce−hx
, (5.9)
respectively. The wave function and its derivative must be continuous at x = 0.
Therefore
1 + B = C
ik(1 − B) = −hC
⇐⇒
B = k−ih
k+ih
C = 2k
k+ih
. (5.10)
10
Let us write k + ih = reiθ
. We obtain
B =
k − ih
k + ih
= e−2iθ
. (5.11)
As we substitute this into Eq. (5.8), we obtain
uI(x) = eikx
+ e−ikx−2iθ
. (5.12)
Now we see that the phase difference between the incoming and the scattered
wave is 2θ.
e) First we note that the wave function can not be normalized (due to its
form outside the step). Outside the step the probability density
ρ(x) = |uI(x)|2
= eikx
+ e−ikx−2iθ ∗
eikx
+ e−ikx−2iθ
= 2 (1 + cos(2kx + 2θ))
= 4 cos2
(kx + θ) . (5.13)
We see that it is an oscillating (i.e. periodic) function of x.
Figure 2: Plot of ρ(x) when k = 2 and θ = π/5.
11

More Related Content

PDF
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space Using (CLRg) Property
PDF
Solution to schrodinger equation with dirac comb potential
PDF
Ladder operator
PPSX
Calculus
PDF
Application of analytic function
PPT
Calculus of variation problems
PPTX
Statistical Physics Assignment Help
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space Using (CLRg) Property
Solution to schrodinger equation with dirac comb potential
Ladder operator
Calculus
Application of analytic function
Calculus of variation problems
Statistical Physics Assignment Help

What's hot (20)

PPT
Prime numbers
PPTX
Application of calculus in everyday life
PPTX
Vector space
PDF
exponen dan logaritma
PPTX
Matlab Assignment Help
PPTX
Inner product spaces
PDF
Lecture5
PDF
Quantum mechanics and the square root of the Brownian motion
PPT
Matrices ii
PDF
Jacobi and gauss-seidel
PDF
Program on Quasi-Monte Carlo and High-Dimensional Sampling Methods for Applie...
PDF
Introduction to Calculus of Variations
PDF
2018 MUMS Fall Course - Bayesian inference for model calibration in UQ - Ralp...
PDF
On the Seidel’s Method, a Stronger Contraction Fixed Point Iterative Method o...
PDF
Calculus of variations & solution manual russak
PDF
Engineering Mathematics-IV_B.Tech_Semester-IV_Unit-I
PDF
22 01 2014_03_23_31_eee_formula_sheet_final
PDF
A Szemeredi-type theorem for subsets of the unit cube
PDF
How to Solve a Partial Differential Equation on a surface
Prime numbers
Application of calculus in everyday life
Vector space
exponen dan logaritma
Matlab Assignment Help
Inner product spaces
Lecture5
Quantum mechanics and the square root of the Brownian motion
Matrices ii
Jacobi and gauss-seidel
Program on Quasi-Monte Carlo and High-Dimensional Sampling Methods for Applie...
Introduction to Calculus of Variations
2018 MUMS Fall Course - Bayesian inference for model calibration in UQ - Ralp...
On the Seidel’s Method, a Stronger Contraction Fixed Point Iterative Method o...
Calculus of variations & solution manual russak
Engineering Mathematics-IV_B.Tech_Semester-IV_Unit-I
22 01 2014_03_23_31_eee_formula_sheet_final
A Szemeredi-type theorem for subsets of the unit cube
How to Solve a Partial Differential Equation on a surface
Ad

Similar to Solution set 3 (20)

PPT
Ph 101-9 QUANTUM MACHANICS
PPT
Schrodinger equation in quantum mechanics
PPT
2-QM Reminders quantum mechanics and chemistry file.ppt
PPT
66_15575_EC210_2014_1__2_1_lecture 10.ppt
PDF
Griffiths2,12 2,14 2,26 2.38
PDF
Wavemechanics
PPT
failure_of_classical_mechanics best concepts.ppt
PPT
CHAPTER 6 Quantum Mechanics II
PPT
TR-6.ppt
PPT
Quantum Mechanics II.ppt
PPTX
QM-Lect12 (The Delta Potential).pptx
PDF
Berans qm overview
PPTX
Atomic structure
PDF
Unit 2_Quantum Mechanics_FY_2024-25__inb.doc. (1).pdf
DOC
An1 derivat.ro fizica-2_quantum physics 2 2010 2011_24125
DOC
An1 derivat.ro fizica-2_quantum physics 2 2010 2011_24125
PDF
Stochastic Schrödinger equations
PDF
Concepts and Problems in Quantum Mechanics, Lecture-II By Manmohan Dash
PDF
Quantum physics the bottom up approach
Ph 101-9 QUANTUM MACHANICS
Schrodinger equation in quantum mechanics
2-QM Reminders quantum mechanics and chemistry file.ppt
66_15575_EC210_2014_1__2_1_lecture 10.ppt
Griffiths2,12 2,14 2,26 2.38
Wavemechanics
failure_of_classical_mechanics best concepts.ppt
CHAPTER 6 Quantum Mechanics II
TR-6.ppt
Quantum Mechanics II.ppt
QM-Lect12 (The Delta Potential).pptx
Berans qm overview
Atomic structure
Unit 2_Quantum Mechanics_FY_2024-25__inb.doc. (1).pdf
An1 derivat.ro fizica-2_quantum physics 2 2010 2011_24125
An1 derivat.ro fizica-2_quantum physics 2 2010 2011_24125
Stochastic Schrödinger equations
Concepts and Problems in Quantum Mechanics, Lecture-II By Manmohan Dash
Quantum physics the bottom up approach
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
microscope-Lecturecjchchchchcuvuvhc.pptx
PPTX
Cell Membrane: Structure, Composition & Functions
PPTX
INTRODUCTION TO EVS | Concept of sustainability
PPT
protein biochemistry.ppt for university classes
PDF
AlphaEarth Foundations and the Satellite Embedding dataset
PPTX
EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY.pptx
PPTX
2Systematics of Living Organisms t-.pptx
PDF
HPLC-PPT.docx high performance liquid chromatography
PDF
An interstellar mission to test astrophysical black holes
DOCX
Viruses (History, structure and composition, classification, Bacteriophage Re...
PDF
SEHH2274 Organic Chemistry Notes 1 Structure and Bonding.pdf
PPTX
Introduction to Cardiovascular system_structure and functions-1
PPTX
Derivatives of integument scales, beaks, horns,.pptx
PDF
Formation of Supersonic Turbulence in the Primordial Star-forming Cloud
PPTX
The KM-GBF monitoring framework – status & key messages.pptx
PPTX
Protein & Amino Acid Structures Levels of protein structure (primary, seconda...
PDF
Phytochemical Investigation of Miliusa longipes.pdf
PPTX
2. Earth - The Living Planet earth and life
PDF
Mastering Bioreactors and Media Sterilization: A Complete Guide to Sterile Fe...
PDF
CAPERS-LRD-z9:AGas-enshroudedLittleRedDotHostingaBroad-lineActive GalacticNuc...
microscope-Lecturecjchchchchcuvuvhc.pptx
Cell Membrane: Structure, Composition & Functions
INTRODUCTION TO EVS | Concept of sustainability
protein biochemistry.ppt for university classes
AlphaEarth Foundations and the Satellite Embedding dataset
EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY.pptx
2Systematics of Living Organisms t-.pptx
HPLC-PPT.docx high performance liquid chromatography
An interstellar mission to test astrophysical black holes
Viruses (History, structure and composition, classification, Bacteriophage Re...
SEHH2274 Organic Chemistry Notes 1 Structure and Bonding.pdf
Introduction to Cardiovascular system_structure and functions-1
Derivatives of integument scales, beaks, horns,.pptx
Formation of Supersonic Turbulence in the Primordial Star-forming Cloud
The KM-GBF monitoring framework – status & key messages.pptx
Protein & Amino Acid Structures Levels of protein structure (primary, seconda...
Phytochemical Investigation of Miliusa longipes.pdf
2. Earth - The Living Planet earth and life
Mastering Bioreactors and Media Sterilization: A Complete Guide to Sterile Fe...
CAPERS-LRD-z9:AGas-enshroudedLittleRedDotHostingaBroad-lineActive GalacticNuc...

Solution set 3

  • 1. 763312A QUANTUM MECHANICS I - solution set 3 - autumn 2012 1. Time Derivative of Momentum Expectation Value A particle moves in a potential V = V (x). Show that the quantum mechanical expectation values satisfy d dt px = − ∂V ∂x where px = −i ∂ ∂x is the momentum operator in the x-direction. Solution In the lecture notes it was shown that d dt r = p m . Here we will proceed in an analogous manner. First we note that d dt px = d dt ψ∗ pxψ dV = ∂ψ∗ ∂t pxψ + ψ∗ px ∂ψ ∂t dV = −i ∂ψ∗ ∂t ∂ψ ∂x − ψ∗ ∂2 ψ ∂x∂t dV, (1.1) where the integral is taken over all space. The time evolution of a wave function is governed by the Schr¨odinger equation. That is say, − 2 2m 2 ψ + V ψ = i ∂ψ ∂t . (1.2) Therefore − 2 2m 2 ψ∗ + V ψ∗ = −i ∂ψ∗ ∂t (1.3) and − 2 2m 2 ∂ψ ∂x + ∂V ∂x ψ + V ∂ψ ∂x = i ∂2 ψ ∂x∂t . (1.4) As we substitute Eqs. (1.3) and (1.4) into Eq. (1.1), we obtain d dt px = − 2 2m 2 ψ ∗ + V ψ ∗ ∂ψ ∂x + ψ ∗ 2 2m 2 ∂ψ ∂x − ∂V ∂x ψ − V ∂ψ ∂x dV = 2 2m ψ ∗ 2 ∂ψ ∂x − ∂ψ ∂x 2 ψ ∗ dV − ψ ∗ ∂V ∂x ψ dV = 2 2m ψ ∗ 2 ∂ψ ∂x − ∂ψ ∂x 2 ψ ∗ dV − ∂V ∂x . (1.5) 1
  • 2. Now we have to show that the first term at the last line vanishes. For that purpose, we state the identities · ψ∗ ∂ψ ∂x = ψ∗ · ∂ψ ∂x + ψ∗ 2 ∂ψ ∂x , (1.6) · ∂ψ ∂x ψ∗ = ∂ψ ∂x · ψ∗ + ∂ψ ∂x 2 ψ∗ . (1.7) By employing these identities and the divergence theorem, we obtain ψ∗ 2 ∂ψ ∂x − ∂ψ ∂x 2 ψ∗ dV = · ψ∗ ∂ψ ∂x − ∂ψ ∂x ψ∗ dV = ψ∗ ∂ψ ∂x − ∂ψ ∂x ψ∗ · d ¯A. (1.8) If this surface integral vanishes, our result is proved. 2
  • 3. 2. Infinite Potential Well Let us consider a particle in an infinite potential well. Calculate the expectation value of its a) kinetic energy, b) potential energy. Solution In the lecture notes, we solved the time-independent Schr¨odinger equation for a particle in an infinite potential well. We found out that the energy eigenfunc- tions are un(x) = 2 a sin nπ a x 0 < x < a, 0 otherwise, (2.1) where n ∈ {1, 2, 3, · · · }. Let us now calculate the expectation value of kinetic energy for the nth energy eigenfunction. We obtain un|T|un = ∞ −∞ u∗ n(x)Tun(x) dx (2.2) = a 0 u∗ n(x)Tun(x) dx, where the last equality follows from the fact that un(x) vanishes if x /∈ (0, a). On the other hand, if x ∈ (0, a), Tun(x) = − 2 2m ∂2 ∂x2 2 a sin nπ a x = 2 2m n2 π2 a2 2 a sin nπ a x = 2 2m n2 π2 a2 un(x). (2.3) Thus un|T|un = 2 2m n2 π2 a2 a 0 u∗ n(x)un(x) dx. (2.4) We recall that we have normalized the functions un(x) (cf. lecture notes). Thus the integral at the right-hand side is equal to unity. It immediately follows that un|T|un = n2 π2 2 2ma2 . (2.5) 3
  • 4. The expectation value of potential energy is un|V |un = ∞ −∞ u∗ n(x)V (x)un(x) dx = 0 −∞ u∗ n(x)V (x)un(x) dx + a 0 u∗ n(x)V (x)un(x) dx + ∞ 0 u∗ n(x)V (x)un(x) dx. (2.6) The second integral vanishes because V (x) = 0 when x ∈ (0, a). However, both the first and the last integral are undefined because the integrands are undefined (the integrands are of the form ∞·0·∞). However, when we consider the infinite potential well as a limiting case of the finite potential well, we obtain the result that there is no contribution to the expectation value of potential energy from the outside of the well 1 . Therefore we set the first and the last integral equal to zero. We obtain the result that the expectation value of potential energy vanishes. That is, un|V |un = 0. (2.7) 1You may want to return to this point after the finite potential well has been discussed in the lectures. 4
  • 5. 3. An Eigenvalue Problem Let us consider the eigenvalue equation ˆAu = λu, ˆA = − d2 dx2 , under the boundary condition u(−a) = u(a) = 0 (a is a positive real number). Determine those eigenfunctions u that correspond to a positive eigenvalue λ . Solution Our eigenvalue equation − d2 dx2 u = λu (3.1) is a second order homogeneous equation with constant coefficients. The associ- ated auxiliary equation reads r2 = −λ. (3.2) The roots of the auxiliary equation are r1 = i √ λ, r2 = −i √ λ. (3.3) The general solution u(x) = C1er1x + C2er2x = C1ei √ λx + C2e−i √ λx = C1 cos √ λx + i sin √ λx + C2 cos √ λx − i sin √ λx = A cos √ λx + B sin √ λx. (3.4) Let us next consider the solutions we obtain for certain values of A and B. A = 0 and B = 0 We obtain the zero function, which is not considered to be an eigenfunction. A ∈ C arbitrary and B = 0 For the resulting eigenfunctions u(x) = A cos √ λx the boundary conditions read cos √ λa = 0. (3.5) This implies that √ λa = π 2 + nπ ⇐⇒ λ = π2 4a2 (1 + 2n) 2 . (3.6) 5
  • 6. A = 0 and B ∈ C arbitrary For the resulting eigenfunctions u(x) = B sin √ λx the boundary conditions read sin √ λa = 0. (3.7) This implies that √ λa = nπ ⇐⇒ λ = π2 a2 n2 . (3.8) A = 0 and B = 0 It is only a minor task to show that the eigenvalues must now be of the form (3.6) and of the form (3.8). Therefore we have to find out whether there are n1, n2 ∈ {1, 2, 3, · · · } satisfying π2 4a2 (1 + 2n1)2 = π2 a2 n2 2 ⇐⇒ 1 + 2n1 = 2n2. (3.9) We see that the left-hand side is odd for all n1, whereas the right-hand side is even for all n2. Therefore there are no eigenvalues that are of the form (3.6) and of the form (3.8). Summary The eigenvalues λn and the corresponding eigenfunctions un: λn = π2 4a2 (1 + 2n) 2 : un(x) = A cos √ λnx, λn = π2 a2 n2 : un(x) = B sin √ λnx. 6
  • 7. 4. Scattering From a Potential Step Particles scatter from a potential step. Show that from the conservation of the probability current it follows that the reflection and transmission coefficients R and T satisfy the condition R + T = 1. Solution In the lecture notes the probability currents outside and inside the potential step are denoted by SI and SII, respectively. Furthermore, SI is divided into two parts, namely into currents towards the positive and negative x-axis. Math- ematically, SI = S+ I + S− I . (4.1) Similarly, we divide SII into currents towards the positive and negative x-axis: SII = S+ II + S− II. (4.2) When the energy of the particle is greater than the step height, there is no probability flow towards the negative x-axis inside the step. On the other hand, when the energy of the particle is smaller than the step height, there is no prob- ability flow to either direction deep inside the step (near the surface the flows to opposite directions cancel out resulting in a zero net flow). To summarize, in both cases deep inside the step SII = S+ II. (4.3) Let us denote the incoming, reflected and transmitted intensities by I+ I , I− I and I+ II, respectively. In terms of these intensities, the reflection and transmis- sion coefficients are R = I− I I+ I and T = I+ II I+ I , (4.4) respectively. On the other hand, I+ I = N|S+ I |, I− I = N|S− I |, I+ II = N|S+ II|, (4.5) where N is the density of the incoming particles and the probability current densities are measured far away from the step (at the so called asymptotical regions mentioned in the lecture notes). The conservation of probability reads SI = SII. (4.6) 7
  • 8. Now R + T = I− I I+ I + I+ II I+ I = N|S− I | N|S+ I | + N|S+ II| N|S+ I | = −S− I + SII S+ I , (4.7) where the last equality holds because we consider S+ II to be measured deep inside the step [cf. Eq. (4.3)]. By using the conservation of probability [Eq. (4.6)], we obtain R + T = −S− I + S+ I + S− I S+ I = 1. (4.8) 8
  • 9. 5. Scattering From a Potential Step Revisited A particle scatters from a potential step of height V0. The energy of the particle E < V0. a) Show that the probability current inside the potential step vanishes. b) Show that total reflection happens. c) Estimate the penetration depth by evaluating x inside the step. d) Show that there is a phase shift between the incoming and scattered wave. e) Study the behavior of the probability density outside the potential step. Solution a) If the total energy E of the particle is lower than the step height V0, the wave function is exponentially decaying inside the potential step. To be more precise, uII(x) = Ce−hx , (5.1) where h = −iκ = 2m(V0 − E) 2 . (5.2) Inside the potential step the probability density current S(x) = m Im uII(x)∗ duII dx (x) = m Im C∗ e−hx −hCe−hx = m Im −|C|2 he−2hx real = 0. (5.3) b) We have total reflection if the reflection coefficient R = 1. On the other hand, it was pointed out in the lecture notes that R = B A 2 , (5.4) where B and A are the amplitudes of the scattered and incoming waves, re- spectively. Moreover, we chose A=1 and obtained B = e−2iθ . As we substitute these into the previous equation, we obtain R = 1. (5.5) That is to say, total reflection happens. 9
  • 10. c) Here we indeed assume that the particle is inside the potential step. Thus the wave function associated with the particle is uII(x) = 2 cos θe−hx e−iθ . As always, it has to be normalized before calculating expectation values. The normalization factor N = ∞ 0 |uII(x)|2 dx = 4 cos2 θ ∞ 0 e−2hx dx = 2 cos2 θ h . (5.6) Now x = 1 N ∞ 0 uII(x)∗ xuII(x) dx = 2h ∞ 0 xe−2hx dx = 1 2h = 1 2 2 2m(V0 − E) . (5.7) d) Figure 1: Schematic picture of k + ih in the complex plane. Let us present the wave function in two parts (just like before). The parts outside and inside the step are uI(x) = eikx + Be−ikx , (5.8) uII(x) = Ce−hx , (5.9) respectively. The wave function and its derivative must be continuous at x = 0. Therefore 1 + B = C ik(1 − B) = −hC ⇐⇒ B = k−ih k+ih C = 2k k+ih . (5.10) 10
  • 11. Let us write k + ih = reiθ . We obtain B = k − ih k + ih = e−2iθ . (5.11) As we substitute this into Eq. (5.8), we obtain uI(x) = eikx + e−ikx−2iθ . (5.12) Now we see that the phase difference between the incoming and the scattered wave is 2θ. e) First we note that the wave function can not be normalized (due to its form outside the step). Outside the step the probability density ρ(x) = |uI(x)|2 = eikx + e−ikx−2iθ ∗ eikx + e−ikx−2iθ = 2 (1 + cos(2kx + 2θ)) = 4 cos2 (kx + θ) . (5.13) We see that it is an oscillating (i.e. periodic) function of x. Figure 2: Plot of ρ(x) when k = 2 and θ = π/5. 11