2
Most read
3
Most read
4
Most read
Assignment
1
Solution to problems
on page 175 of
Multinational
Financial
Management by
Shapiro

Gaurav Sharma
Question: 1. From base price levels of 100 in 2000, Japanese and U.S. price levels in
2003 stood at 102 and 106, respectively.

a. If the 2000 $:¥ exchange rate was $0.007692, what should the exchange rate be in
   2003?

ANSWER:

If E2003 is the dollar value of the yen in 2003, then

According to purchasing power parity

                                      So e2003/0.007692 = 106/102

                                      So e2003 = $0.007994.

So exchange rate in 2003 would be = $0.007994

b. In fact, the exchange rate in 2003 was ¥ 1 = $0.008696. What might account for the
   discrepancy? (Price levels were measured using the consumer price index.)

ANSWER. The discrepancy between the predicted rate of $0.007994 and the actual rate
 of $0.008696 could be due to the fact that there may be difference between the
 relevant price indices.

   Alternatively, it could be due to a switch in investors' preferences from dollar to
  non-dollar assets.



Question: 2. Two countries, the United States and England, produces only one good,
 wheat. Suppose the price of wheat is $3.25 in the United States and is £1.35 in
 England.

   a. According to the law of one price, what should the $:£ spot exchange rate be?

ANSWER. Since the price of wheat must be the same in both nations

            The exchange rate           e =3.25/1.35



                 So                     e = $2.4074.



2|Page
b. Suppose the price of wheat over the next year is expected to rise to $3.50 in the
  United States and to £1.60 in England. What should the one-year $:£ forward rate be?

ANSWER. In this certainty, the forward rate,

                            f = 3.50/1.60

                            f = $2.1875

   c. If the U.S. government imposes a tariff of $0.50 per bushel on wheat imported
      from England, what is the maximum possible change in the spot exchange rate
      that could occur?


ANSWER. If e is the exchange rate,

Then wheat selling in England at £1.35 will sell in the United States for 1.35e +0.5,

 Where the 0.5 is US tariff on English wheat.

In order to eliminate the possibility of arbitrage,

There should be 1.35e + 0.5 >= $3.25,

So the price of wheat in the US or e > $2.0370

So the maximum exchange rate change that could occur is (2.4074 - 2.0370)/2.4074 =
  15.38%.



Question: 3. If expected inflation is 100 percent and the real required return is 5 percent,
 what will the nominal interest rate be according to the Fisher effect?

Solution: According to the Fisher effect, the relationship between the nominal interest
  rate, r, and the real interest rate a, and the expected inflation rate, i, is

                                                         1 + r = (1 + a)(1 + i)

Substituting in the numbers in the problem yields

                                                         1 + r =1.05 x 2 = 2.1,

                                                         So r = 110%.


3|Page
Question:4. In early 1996, the short-term interest rate in France was 3.7%, and forecast
 French inflation was 1.8%. At the same time, the short-term German interest rate was
 2.6% and forecast German inflation was 1.6%.

a. Based on these figures, what were the real interest rates in France and Germany?

ANSWER

According to the Fisher effect, the relationship between the nominal interest rate, r, and
  the real interest rate a, and the expected inflation rate, i, is

                                                        1 + r = (1 + a)(1 + i)

So

In France’s real interest rate was 1.037/1.018 - 1 = 1.87%.

The Germany’s real interest rate was 1.026/1.016 - 1 = 0.98%.



b. To what would you attribute any discrepancy in real rates between France and
  Germany?

ANSWER. The most likely reason for the discrepancy is the inclusion of a higher
 inflation risk component in the French real interest rate than in the German real rate.

           Other at are the attributes of discrepancy are currency risk or transactions
  costs.

Question: 5. In July, the one-year interest rate is 12% on British pounds and 9% on U.S.
 dollars.

a. If the current exchange rate is $1.63:£1, what is the expected future exchange rate in
   one year?

ANSWER. According to the international Fisher effect, the spot exchange rate expected
 in one year equals to



                                      1.09/1.12 = $1.5863.




4|Page
b. Suppose a change in expectations regarding future U.S. inflation causes the expected
   future spot rate to decline to $1.52:£1. What should happen to the U.S. interest rate?

ANSWER

Assuming that the British interest rate stayed at 12%,

So according to the International Fisher Effect

= 1.52/1.63 = (1+US Interest Rate)/1.12

So US Interest rate = 4.44%.

So if US future spot rate declines to $1.52:£1, US Interest rate will decline from 9% to
  4.44%.




5|Page

More Related Content

PPTX
International parity condition
PPT
International Arbitrage and Interest Rate Parity (IRP)
PDF
Chapter9 International Finance Management
PPTX
International fisher effect
PPT
Chapter 13_The Foreign Exchange Market
PPTX
interest rate parity
PPTX
Foreign exchange market-final ppt(my)
PDF
Chapter10 International Finance Management
International parity condition
International Arbitrage and Interest Rate Parity (IRP)
Chapter9 International Finance Management
International fisher effect
Chapter 13_The Foreign Exchange Market
interest rate parity
Foreign exchange market-final ppt(my)
Chapter10 International Finance Management

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Covered interest arbitrage (1) (2)
PPTX
Weighted average cost of capital (market value
 
PPTX
Interest rate parity (Global Finance)
PPTX
interest rate and currency swaps
PPTX
Unit 2.2 Exchange Rate Quotations & Forex Markets
PPTX
Foreign exchange market
PPT
International monetary system
PDF
Exchange Controls
PDF
Chapter 14
PPTX
Exchange rate & international trade
PPTX
Foreign exchange market
PPT
Exchange Rate Determination
PPTX
Payoff options
PPT
Currency Hedging Presentation
PPT
Multinational capital budgeting
PPT
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAGE & INTEREST RATE PARITY
PDF
Chapter5 International Finance Management
PPT
Ch04 Exchange rate determination
PPT
Bond valuation and risk
PPT
Forecasting exchange rates 1
Covered interest arbitrage (1) (2)
Weighted average cost of capital (market value
 
Interest rate parity (Global Finance)
interest rate and currency swaps
Unit 2.2 Exchange Rate Quotations & Forex Markets
Foreign exchange market
International monetary system
Exchange Controls
Chapter 14
Exchange rate & international trade
Foreign exchange market
Exchange Rate Determination
Payoff options
Currency Hedging Presentation
Multinational capital budgeting
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAGE & INTEREST RATE PARITY
Chapter5 International Finance Management
Ch04 Exchange rate determination
Bond valuation and risk
Forecasting exchange rates 1
Ad

Similar to Solution to problems on page 175 of multinational financial management by shapiro (20)

PPT
Foreign Exchange Markets
PDF
Chapter6 International Finance Management
PDF
Chapter6
PDF
Fisher effect Simple Example
DOCX
Fin 535 week 11 final exam – strayer new
DOCX
Fin 535 week 11 final exam – strayer new
DOCX
Fin 535 week 11 final exam – strayer new
PPT
International parity-conditions-9-feb-2010
PDF
IFM - Chapter 6.pdf
PPTX
UZ Exchange rates and International Parity Relationships.pptx
PPT
Chapter8-ed 8-bajar- PPP IFE - 2023_TM 6.ppt
PDF
Combining Economic Fundamentals to Predict Exchange Rates
DOCX
New microsoft office word document (5)
PDF
Niraj On International Finance Theory
PPT
ch04[1].ppt
PPT
Ch04[1]parity
PDF
1 s2.0-s0167268105000983-main
PPT
331 7 (1)
PPTX
58795453258962548632586325632586352236.pptx
PPTX
Lecture Chapter 6_accessiblePPT.pptx chp
Foreign Exchange Markets
Chapter6 International Finance Management
Chapter6
Fisher effect Simple Example
Fin 535 week 11 final exam – strayer new
Fin 535 week 11 final exam – strayer new
Fin 535 week 11 final exam – strayer new
International parity-conditions-9-feb-2010
IFM - Chapter 6.pdf
UZ Exchange rates and International Parity Relationships.pptx
Chapter8-ed 8-bajar- PPP IFE - 2023_TM 6.ppt
Combining Economic Fundamentals to Predict Exchange Rates
New microsoft office word document (5)
Niraj On International Finance Theory
ch04[1].ppt
Ch04[1]parity
1 s2.0-s0167268105000983-main
331 7 (1)
58795453258962548632586325632586352236.pptx
Lecture Chapter 6_accessiblePPT.pptx chp
Ad

More from GAURAV SHARMA (14)

PPTX
Financial risk management
PPT
Buyer supplier relationship
PPTX
Ryan air
PPTX
International monetary system
PPTX
Enterprise Risk Management
PPTX
Enterprise Risk Management
PPTX
Rolls royce
PPTX
Pestel analysis : Banking sector
DOCX
Pest analysis of textile industry
DOCX
Balanced score card pantaloon retail limited
DOCX
Fundamental management process of pantaloon retail limited
PPTX
Ppt buyonlineindia case study
PPT
Mormugao port ppt
PPTX
Stock market for begineers
Financial risk management
Buyer supplier relationship
Ryan air
International monetary system
Enterprise Risk Management
Enterprise Risk Management
Rolls royce
Pestel analysis : Banking sector
Pest analysis of textile industry
Balanced score card pantaloon retail limited
Fundamental management process of pantaloon retail limited
Ppt buyonlineindia case study
Mormugao port ppt
Stock market for begineers

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Grp C.ppt presentation.pptx for Economics
PDF
5-principles-of-PD-design.pdfvvvhvjvvcjcxhhcjb ggfvjhvjjhbvbbbvccxhgcxzzghjbv...
PDF
2018_Simulating Hedge Fund Strategies Generalising Fund Performance Presentat...
PDF
Fintech Regulatory Sandbox: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects
PDF
Pitch Deck.pdf .pdf all about finance in
PDF
Buy Verified Stripe Accounts for Sale - Secure and.pdf
PPT
features and equilibrium under MONOPOLY 17.11.20.ppt
PPTX
OAT_ORI_Fed Independence_August 2025.pptx
PDF
CLIMATE CHANGE AS A THREAT MULTIPLIER: ASSESSING ITS IMPACT ON RESOURCE SCARC...
PPTX
General-Characteristics-of-Microorganisms.pptx
PDF
2012_The dark side of valuation a jedi guide to valuing difficult to value co...
PDF
Unkipdf.pdf of work in the economy we are
PDF
Pension Trustee Training (1).pdf From Salih Shah
PPTX
28 - relative valuation lecture economicsnotes
PPT
KPMG FA Benefits Report_FINAL_Jan 27_2010.ppt
DOCX
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE SITUATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF FELIX HOTEL IN H...
PDF
International Financial Management, 9th Edition, Cheol Eun, Bruce Resnick Tuu...
PPTX
Maths science sst hindi english cucumber
PDF
Buy Verified Payoneer Accounts for Sale - Secure and.pdf
Grp C.ppt presentation.pptx for Economics
5-principles-of-PD-design.pdfvvvhvjvvcjcxhhcjb ggfvjhvjjhbvbbbvccxhgcxzzghjbv...
2018_Simulating Hedge Fund Strategies Generalising Fund Performance Presentat...
Fintech Regulatory Sandbox: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects
Pitch Deck.pdf .pdf all about finance in
Buy Verified Stripe Accounts for Sale - Secure and.pdf
features and equilibrium under MONOPOLY 17.11.20.ppt
OAT_ORI_Fed Independence_August 2025.pptx
CLIMATE CHANGE AS A THREAT MULTIPLIER: ASSESSING ITS IMPACT ON RESOURCE SCARC...
General-Characteristics-of-Microorganisms.pptx
2012_The dark side of valuation a jedi guide to valuing difficult to value co...
Unkipdf.pdf of work in the economy we are
Pension Trustee Training (1).pdf From Salih Shah
28 - relative valuation lecture economicsnotes
KPMG FA Benefits Report_FINAL_Jan 27_2010.ppt
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE SITUATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF FELIX HOTEL IN H...
International Financial Management, 9th Edition, Cheol Eun, Bruce Resnick Tuu...
Maths science sst hindi english cucumber
Buy Verified Payoneer Accounts for Sale - Secure and.pdf

Solution to problems on page 175 of multinational financial management by shapiro

  • 1. Assignment 1 Solution to problems on page 175 of Multinational Financial Management by Shapiro Gaurav Sharma
  • 2. Question: 1. From base price levels of 100 in 2000, Japanese and U.S. price levels in 2003 stood at 102 and 106, respectively. a. If the 2000 $:¥ exchange rate was $0.007692, what should the exchange rate be in 2003? ANSWER: If E2003 is the dollar value of the yen in 2003, then According to purchasing power parity So e2003/0.007692 = 106/102 So e2003 = $0.007994. So exchange rate in 2003 would be = $0.007994 b. In fact, the exchange rate in 2003 was ¥ 1 = $0.008696. What might account for the discrepancy? (Price levels were measured using the consumer price index.) ANSWER. The discrepancy between the predicted rate of $0.007994 and the actual rate of $0.008696 could be due to the fact that there may be difference between the relevant price indices. Alternatively, it could be due to a switch in investors' preferences from dollar to non-dollar assets. Question: 2. Two countries, the United States and England, produces only one good, wheat. Suppose the price of wheat is $3.25 in the United States and is £1.35 in England. a. According to the law of one price, what should the $:£ spot exchange rate be? ANSWER. Since the price of wheat must be the same in both nations The exchange rate e =3.25/1.35 So e = $2.4074. 2|Page
  • 3. b. Suppose the price of wheat over the next year is expected to rise to $3.50 in the United States and to £1.60 in England. What should the one-year $:£ forward rate be? ANSWER. In this certainty, the forward rate, f = 3.50/1.60 f = $2.1875 c. If the U.S. government imposes a tariff of $0.50 per bushel on wheat imported from England, what is the maximum possible change in the spot exchange rate that could occur? ANSWER. If e is the exchange rate, Then wheat selling in England at £1.35 will sell in the United States for 1.35e +0.5, Where the 0.5 is US tariff on English wheat. In order to eliminate the possibility of arbitrage, There should be 1.35e + 0.5 >= $3.25, So the price of wheat in the US or e > $2.0370 So the maximum exchange rate change that could occur is (2.4074 - 2.0370)/2.4074 = 15.38%. Question: 3. If expected inflation is 100 percent and the real required return is 5 percent, what will the nominal interest rate be according to the Fisher effect? Solution: According to the Fisher effect, the relationship between the nominal interest rate, r, and the real interest rate a, and the expected inflation rate, i, is 1 + r = (1 + a)(1 + i) Substituting in the numbers in the problem yields 1 + r =1.05 x 2 = 2.1, So r = 110%. 3|Page
  • 4. Question:4. In early 1996, the short-term interest rate in France was 3.7%, and forecast French inflation was 1.8%. At the same time, the short-term German interest rate was 2.6% and forecast German inflation was 1.6%. a. Based on these figures, what were the real interest rates in France and Germany? ANSWER According to the Fisher effect, the relationship between the nominal interest rate, r, and the real interest rate a, and the expected inflation rate, i, is 1 + r = (1 + a)(1 + i) So In France’s real interest rate was 1.037/1.018 - 1 = 1.87%. The Germany’s real interest rate was 1.026/1.016 - 1 = 0.98%. b. To what would you attribute any discrepancy in real rates between France and Germany? ANSWER. The most likely reason for the discrepancy is the inclusion of a higher inflation risk component in the French real interest rate than in the German real rate. Other at are the attributes of discrepancy are currency risk or transactions costs. Question: 5. In July, the one-year interest rate is 12% on British pounds and 9% on U.S. dollars. a. If the current exchange rate is $1.63:£1, what is the expected future exchange rate in one year? ANSWER. According to the international Fisher effect, the spot exchange rate expected in one year equals to 1.09/1.12 = $1.5863. 4|Page
  • 5. b. Suppose a change in expectations regarding future U.S. inflation causes the expected future spot rate to decline to $1.52:£1. What should happen to the U.S. interest rate? ANSWER Assuming that the British interest rate stayed at 12%, So according to the International Fisher Effect = 1.52/1.63 = (1+US Interest Rate)/1.12 So US Interest rate = 4.44%. So if US future spot rate declines to $1.52:£1, US Interest rate will decline from 9% to 4.44%. 5|Page