SlideShare a Scribd company logo
SOME NONPARAMETRIC STATISTIC
FOR CATEGORICAL & ORDINAL DATA
Desmond Ayim-Aboagye, Ph.D.
Preliminary Information
• Chi-square test and others to be studied here
are much less complex than the inferential
tests treated already by us.
• Hypothesis testing but with different sorts of
data
• Nonparametric tests – questions that do not
lend themselves to analysis by the usual
inferential statistics
A Campus Physician
• A campus physician is interested in
determining whether male or female students
are equally aware that regular workshops on
wellness, fitness, and diet are offered by the
health center. She randomly samples 200
students (half male, half female) and asks
whether they are aware of these programs,
subsequently comparing the frequencies of
their responses. The data follows:
Aware Workshops are Offered?
Gender Yes No
Male 30 70
Female 80 20
Frequencies
• Responses are readily categorized as raw
frequencies:
• “Yes, I know about the workshops“ or
• “No, I did not know about the workshops"
Observation
• A nonparametric test performed on such data
enables us to take any speculation a step
further, to consider whether the observed
pattern of responses is statistically valid (i.e.,
women are more aware of available campus
health initiatives than men).
Nonparametric analyses
• 1. Ranks things
• 2. Study association between variables, i.e.,
correlation.
Parametric Tests
• A parametric statistic is an inferential test that, prior to
its use, assumes that certain specific characteristics are
true of a population – particularly the shape of its
distribution – from which data are drawn for analysis.
• Parametric tests concern Population parameters such
as 𝜇, 𝜎 and making inferences about those parameters,
requiring that certain assumptions be met before they
can properly be used for data analysis.
• Bell-shape or normal distributions
• When a set of data are not normal in shape ( i.e., a
distribution is said to be skewed).
Nonparametric Tests
• A nonparametric statistic is an inferential test, one that
makes few or sometimes no assumptions regarding any
numerical data or the shape of the population from
which the observations were drawn.
• Known as “distribution-free tests of significance“
• Normality need not be met.
• Too few observation exist, a distribution is skewed.
• Parametric tests assumptions are violated
Advantages of Using Nonparametric
Tests
• 1. Nonparametric statistical tests are usually
“distribution free“
• 2. Nonparametric statistical tests can be used to
analyze data that are not precisely numerical.[
parametric use only interval and ratio scales
while nonparametric nominally scaled or rank,
that is, ordinally scaled ]
• 3. Nonparametric statistical tests are ideal for
analyzing data from small samples.
• Nonparametric statistical tests are generally easy
to calculate.
Disadvantages of Nonparametric Tests
• 1. Nonparametric tests are less statistically
powerful than parametric tests.
• 2. The scales of measurement analyzed by
nonparametric tests (i.e., chiefly nominal or
ordinal data) are less sensitive than those
analyzed by parametric tests (i.e., chiefly
interval and ratio data)
Research design Nominal data Ordinal data Parametric Tests
One sample X² goodness-of-fit --- One sample t or z test
Two independent samples X² test of Independ. Mann-Whitney U test Independent groups t test
Two dependent samples --- WilcoXon matched-pairs Dependent groups t test
signed-rank test
More than three Independ X² test of Indep. --- One-way ANOVA
samples
Correlation ----- Spearman rs Pearson r
Nonparametric Tests for
Research Designs and the Nonparametric and Parametric Tests Available to Analyze Their Data
Nonparametric Tests
• Nonparametric test used to analyze nominal
data basically infer whether the pattern
discerned across some number of categories is
anticipated by chance or not.
• When nonparametric tests are applied to
ordinal data, they are often used to discern
whether one sample of observations has
higher rankings than another sample.
The Chi-Square (X²) Test for Categorical
Data
• Categorical data – keeping track of
frequencies
• Frequencies refer to the number of
observations or items than can be
meaningfully grouped under some heading or
label.
• For example, “Are there more women over 6
feet than under that height in a sample"
Chi-Square (X² )
• Chi-Square (X²) compares observed
frequencies against expected frequencies.
• It also makes inference about the presence or
absence of some pattern. , “Are there more
women over 6 feet than under that height in a
sample"
Chi-Square (X² ) Statistical
Assumptions
• 1 Chi-Square (X² ) is not a single distribution but rather a collection
of similar curves, each of which is based on some number of
degrees of freedom.
• 2. Chi-Square (X² ) is similar to the t distribution in that it is based
on one degree of freedom value ( in contrast the F statistic is always
based on two separate degrees of freedom values.)
• 3. Chi-Square (X² ) need not be applied to data that conform to any
particular shape (i.e., normal distribution), though the observations
must be nominal.
• 4. Chi-Square (X² ) observations are randomly selected from some
larger population.
• 5. Chi-Square (X² ) number of expected observations within a given
category should be reasonably large. A good rule of thumb is to
have few (preferably no) categories with less than an expected
frequency of 5 observations in any given analysis.
The Chi-square Test for One-variable:
Goodness-of-Fit
• We work with Nominal data and therefore concentrate
on categories in order to explore the relative
frequencies or proportions present in some
distributions.
• Examples:
• A. How many experimental psychologists are males
rather than females?
• B. Of the four most popular majors at the college,
which one do sophomores choose most often?
• Here FREQUENCIES and COMPARISONS are made
based on how the observations are categorized.
• Statistical test is called Goodness of Fit
Goodness-of-Fit
• Using sample data, the Chi-square test for goodness-of-fit tests
whether obtained observations conform to or "fit" or diverge from
the population proportions specified by a null hypothesis.
• Goodness-of-fit points to the comparison of what pattern or
distribution of frequencies would be anticipated due to chance
versus the one that is actually obtained.
• When the fit between “observed“ and “expected“ observations is
good, then we know that the distribution of observation across the
available categories is more or less equal.
• When the discrepancy between observed and expected
observations is sufficiently large, however, then a significant
difference is likely to be found between or among the categories.
• The departure of observed from expected results means that the fit
is not " good,“ that some influential factors or factor is presumably
causing it.
Example to Illustrate
• A statistics instructor asks the 35 students in
her class to complete a standard course
evaluation. One of the key questions of
interest to this instructor was:
• "Statistic was my favorite class this semester.“
OBSERVED DATA
Strongly agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly disagree
17 8 3 2 5
"Statistic was my favorite class this semester.“ (N = 35)
Chi-square test statistic X² indicates whether there is a
difference between some observed set of frequencies – the
data drawn from a piece of research– and a set of expected
frequencies. These expected frequencies constitute the
predictions made under the null hypothesis.
Steps for Testing a Hypothesis Using a Nonparametric Test
1. Verify that the data are based on a Nominal or an ordinal
scale, not on an interval or a ratio scale
2. State the null (H0) and the alternative (H1) hypothesis
3. Select a significance level (p value or 𝛼 level) for the
nonparametric test.
4. Perform the analyses using the statistic, determining
whether to accept or reject (H0). Interpret and evaluate the
results in light of the hypothesis, and if necessary, go to
step 5.
5. Compute any supporting statistics
Chi-Square test for Goodness-of-Fit
• It involves: 2 forms
• No frequency difference among a set of
different categories
• No frequency difference from a comparison
population.
Chi-Square test for Goodness-of-Fit
• Ho: No difference in course ratings across the five rating categories ( i.e.,
strongly agree to strongly disagree )
• Because there are 35 students, the EXPECTED FREQUENCY for each
category when no difference exists would 7 (35 ÷
5 possible categories equals/ = 7 students in each one)
EXPECTED DATA UNDER H0
Strongly agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly Disagree
7 7 7 7 7
The general rule of thumb for determining the expected frequencies for the chi-
square test for goodness-of-fit test is simply dividing N by the number of
available categories.
The alternative hypothesis, then, is
H1: There is statistically reliable difference between the observed and
expected frequencies.
COMPARISON DATA UNDER H0
STRONGLY AGREE AGREE UNDECIDED DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE
4 10 11 5 5
H0: No difference in course ratings from prior semester across
the five rating categories (i.e., strongly agree to strongly disagree)
H1: There is a statistically reliable difference between the
observed and the comparison frequencies.
Calculation for Test Statistic : CHI-SQUARE TEST
X² = Σ (fo- fE)²
fE
Calculating X² Test Statistic Using a Tabular Format
fo fE (fo-fE) (fo-fE) ² (fo-fE)²/fE
Strongly agree 17 7
Agree 8 7
Uncertain 3 7
Disagree 2 7
Strongly disagree 5 7
Σfo = 35 ΣfE 35
Note: N = 35 (i.e., Σfo) respondents. These data are based on
hypothetical responses to the statement “Statistics was my
favorite class this semester.“
Chi-square (X²) = 20.86
Dfx = K-1 ( The original rating scale is based
on 5 categories, so the degree of freedom for
this X² test statistic are):
Dfx = 5-1
Dfx = 4.
X² (4, N = 35) = 20.86, p < .05 [APA Style]

More Related Content

PDF
9.testing of hypothesis
PDF
How to Know if a Quantitative Research Design Is Appropriate for Your Study
PDF
Data Collection, Sampling, Measurement Concept, Questionnaire Designing-Types
PPT
Experimental
PDF
The Development of the Biostatistics & Clinical Epideimiolgy Skills (BACES) A...
PPTX
Experimental and non experimental research
PPTX
Hypothesis Testing
PPTX
RESEARCH METHOD - SAMPLING
9.testing of hypothesis
How to Know if a Quantitative Research Design Is Appropriate for Your Study
Data Collection, Sampling, Measurement Concept, Questionnaire Designing-Types
Experimental
The Development of the Biostatistics & Clinical Epideimiolgy Skills (BACES) A...
Experimental and non experimental research
Hypothesis Testing
RESEARCH METHOD - SAMPLING

What's hot (20)

PDF
Methodology
PPTX
Research methodology iii
PPTX
Experimental method of Educational Research.
PPTX
Stats chapter 5
PDF
Research Methodology in Gait Analysis
PPTX
Ds 2251 -_hypothesis test
PPT
Experimental research
PPTX
Parmetric and non parametric statistical test in clinical trails
PPTX
Research Design and Sampling
PPT
Topic 1 introduction to quantitative research
PPTX
Causal comparative research
PPTX
Ethics In Research
PDF
Experimental Research Design - Meaning, Characteristics and Classification
PPT
Experimental research sd
PDF
PPTX
When to use, What Statistical Test for data Analysis modified.pptx
PPTX
Experimental design techniques
PPT
R m 99
PPTX
Comparing research designs fw 2013 handout version
PDF
Tools of Education Research- Dr. K. Thiyagu
Methodology
Research methodology iii
Experimental method of Educational Research.
Stats chapter 5
Research Methodology in Gait Analysis
Ds 2251 -_hypothesis test
Experimental research
Parmetric and non parametric statistical test in clinical trails
Research Design and Sampling
Topic 1 introduction to quantitative research
Causal comparative research
Ethics In Research
Experimental Research Design - Meaning, Characteristics and Classification
Experimental research sd
When to use, What Statistical Test for data Analysis modified.pptx
Experimental design techniques
R m 99
Comparing research designs fw 2013 handout version
Tools of Education Research- Dr. K. Thiyagu
Ad

Similar to Some nonparametric statistic for categorical &amp; ordinal data (20)

PDF
Unit-4.-Chi-squjkljl;jj;ljl;jlm;lml;mare.pdf
PPTX
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
PPTX
Non-Parametric Statistics | DATA: MEASUREMENTS OR OBSERVATION OF A VARIABLE
PPSX
Chi squared test
PPT
Chi square mahmoud
DOCX
36086 Topic Discussion3Number of Pages 2 (Double Spaced).docx
PPTX
Chi square test
PPT
Chi square test final presentation
PPTX
Non parametric test- Muskan (M.Pharm-3rd semester)
PPTX
Inferential Statistics: Chi Square (X2) - DAY 6 - B.ED - 8614 - AIOU
PDF
Chi-Square Test Presentation__Method.pdf
PDF
Non Parametric Test by Vikramjit Singh
PPT
chi square-.ppt
PPTX
Significance Tests
PPTX
Chi-Square Test assignment Stat ppt.pptx
PPTX
Presentation chi-square test & Anova
PPT
chisquare-150401011836-conversion-gate01.ppt
PPTX
Parametric & non parametric
PPT
Chi square2012
Unit-4.-Chi-squjkljl;jj;ljl;jlm;lml;mare.pdf
The Chi-Square Statistic: Tests for Goodness of Fit and Independence
Non-Parametric Statistics | DATA: MEASUREMENTS OR OBSERVATION OF A VARIABLE
Chi squared test
Chi square mahmoud
36086 Topic Discussion3Number of Pages 2 (Double Spaced).docx
Chi square test
Chi square test final presentation
Non parametric test- Muskan (M.Pharm-3rd semester)
Inferential Statistics: Chi Square (X2) - DAY 6 - B.ED - 8614 - AIOU
Chi-Square Test Presentation__Method.pdf
Non Parametric Test by Vikramjit Singh
chi square-.ppt
Significance Tests
Chi-Square Test assignment Stat ppt.pptx
Presentation chi-square test & Anova
chisquare-150401011836-conversion-gate01.ppt
Parametric & non parametric
Chi square2012
Ad

More from Regent University (20)

PPT
Publications requirements in journal pub
PPT
How_to_get_published_what_journals_look_for.ppt
DOCX
INFORMATION ON Ph.D. Education.edited.docx
DOCX
APSY 602Psychopathology and Differential Diagnosis I.docx
DOCX
APSY 601 Statistics and research techniques for social sciences I.docx
DOCX
APSY 603 Statistics and research techniques for social sciences 225.docx
PPTX
Eating Behavior.pptx Health Psychology class for the undergraduate students
PPTX
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PAIN.pptx Health Psychology class for the undergraduate stu...
PPTX
HIV and Cancer.pptx Health psychology for the undergraduate students
PPT
EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY.ppt criminal psychol
PPT
Interviewing Suspects in Criminal Cases.ppt
PPT
DETECTING DECEPTION.ppt psychology crimi
DOCX
MedicalResearcher.edited.docx in Sweden,
PPT
Policing.ppt criminal psychology in introduction
PPT
Offender Profiling and Linking Crime.ppt
PPT
Definitions and Historical Background.ppt
PPT
Zero State Theorem of Medical Science.ppt
PPT
Swedish Prisons Presentation1.ppt
PPTX
What about the 80% (Farmers)
PPT
Theorems in Medicine
Publications requirements in journal pub
How_to_get_published_what_journals_look_for.ppt
INFORMATION ON Ph.D. Education.edited.docx
APSY 602Psychopathology and Differential Diagnosis I.docx
APSY 601 Statistics and research techniques for social sciences I.docx
APSY 603 Statistics and research techniques for social sciences 225.docx
Eating Behavior.pptx Health Psychology class for the undergraduate students
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PAIN.pptx Health Psychology class for the undergraduate stu...
HIV and Cancer.pptx Health psychology for the undergraduate students
EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY.ppt criminal psychol
Interviewing Suspects in Criminal Cases.ppt
DETECTING DECEPTION.ppt psychology crimi
MedicalResearcher.edited.docx in Sweden,
Policing.ppt criminal psychology in introduction
Offender Profiling and Linking Crime.ppt
Definitions and Historical Background.ppt
Zero State Theorem of Medical Science.ppt
Swedish Prisons Presentation1.ppt
What about the 80% (Farmers)
Theorems in Medicine

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PDF
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
PDF
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PDF
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
Indian roads congress 037 - 2012 Flexible pavement
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PPTX
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
advance database management system book.pdf
Indian roads congress 037 - 2012 Flexible pavement
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...

Some nonparametric statistic for categorical &amp; ordinal data

  • 1. SOME NONPARAMETRIC STATISTIC FOR CATEGORICAL & ORDINAL DATA Desmond Ayim-Aboagye, Ph.D.
  • 2. Preliminary Information • Chi-square test and others to be studied here are much less complex than the inferential tests treated already by us. • Hypothesis testing but with different sorts of data • Nonparametric tests – questions that do not lend themselves to analysis by the usual inferential statistics
  • 3. A Campus Physician • A campus physician is interested in determining whether male or female students are equally aware that regular workshops on wellness, fitness, and diet are offered by the health center. She randomly samples 200 students (half male, half female) and asks whether they are aware of these programs, subsequently comparing the frequencies of their responses. The data follows:
  • 4. Aware Workshops are Offered? Gender Yes No Male 30 70 Female 80 20
  • 5. Frequencies • Responses are readily categorized as raw frequencies: • “Yes, I know about the workshops“ or • “No, I did not know about the workshops"
  • 6. Observation • A nonparametric test performed on such data enables us to take any speculation a step further, to consider whether the observed pattern of responses is statistically valid (i.e., women are more aware of available campus health initiatives than men).
  • 7. Nonparametric analyses • 1. Ranks things • 2. Study association between variables, i.e., correlation.
  • 8. Parametric Tests • A parametric statistic is an inferential test that, prior to its use, assumes that certain specific characteristics are true of a population – particularly the shape of its distribution – from which data are drawn for analysis. • Parametric tests concern Population parameters such as 𝜇, 𝜎 and making inferences about those parameters, requiring that certain assumptions be met before they can properly be used for data analysis. • Bell-shape or normal distributions • When a set of data are not normal in shape ( i.e., a distribution is said to be skewed).
  • 9. Nonparametric Tests • A nonparametric statistic is an inferential test, one that makes few or sometimes no assumptions regarding any numerical data or the shape of the population from which the observations were drawn. • Known as “distribution-free tests of significance“ • Normality need not be met. • Too few observation exist, a distribution is skewed. • Parametric tests assumptions are violated
  • 10. Advantages of Using Nonparametric Tests • 1. Nonparametric statistical tests are usually “distribution free“ • 2. Nonparametric statistical tests can be used to analyze data that are not precisely numerical.[ parametric use only interval and ratio scales while nonparametric nominally scaled or rank, that is, ordinally scaled ] • 3. Nonparametric statistical tests are ideal for analyzing data from small samples. • Nonparametric statistical tests are generally easy to calculate.
  • 11. Disadvantages of Nonparametric Tests • 1. Nonparametric tests are less statistically powerful than parametric tests. • 2. The scales of measurement analyzed by nonparametric tests (i.e., chiefly nominal or ordinal data) are less sensitive than those analyzed by parametric tests (i.e., chiefly interval and ratio data)
  • 12. Research design Nominal data Ordinal data Parametric Tests One sample X² goodness-of-fit --- One sample t or z test Two independent samples X² test of Independ. Mann-Whitney U test Independent groups t test Two dependent samples --- WilcoXon matched-pairs Dependent groups t test signed-rank test More than three Independ X² test of Indep. --- One-way ANOVA samples Correlation ----- Spearman rs Pearson r Nonparametric Tests for Research Designs and the Nonparametric and Parametric Tests Available to Analyze Their Data
  • 13. Nonparametric Tests • Nonparametric test used to analyze nominal data basically infer whether the pattern discerned across some number of categories is anticipated by chance or not. • When nonparametric tests are applied to ordinal data, they are often used to discern whether one sample of observations has higher rankings than another sample.
  • 14. The Chi-Square (X²) Test for Categorical Data • Categorical data – keeping track of frequencies • Frequencies refer to the number of observations or items than can be meaningfully grouped under some heading or label. • For example, “Are there more women over 6 feet than under that height in a sample"
  • 15. Chi-Square (X² ) • Chi-Square (X²) compares observed frequencies against expected frequencies. • It also makes inference about the presence or absence of some pattern. , “Are there more women over 6 feet than under that height in a sample"
  • 16. Chi-Square (X² ) Statistical Assumptions • 1 Chi-Square (X² ) is not a single distribution but rather a collection of similar curves, each of which is based on some number of degrees of freedom. • 2. Chi-Square (X² ) is similar to the t distribution in that it is based on one degree of freedom value ( in contrast the F statistic is always based on two separate degrees of freedom values.) • 3. Chi-Square (X² ) need not be applied to data that conform to any particular shape (i.e., normal distribution), though the observations must be nominal. • 4. Chi-Square (X² ) observations are randomly selected from some larger population. • 5. Chi-Square (X² ) number of expected observations within a given category should be reasonably large. A good rule of thumb is to have few (preferably no) categories with less than an expected frequency of 5 observations in any given analysis.
  • 17. The Chi-square Test for One-variable: Goodness-of-Fit • We work with Nominal data and therefore concentrate on categories in order to explore the relative frequencies or proportions present in some distributions. • Examples: • A. How many experimental psychologists are males rather than females? • B. Of the four most popular majors at the college, which one do sophomores choose most often? • Here FREQUENCIES and COMPARISONS are made based on how the observations are categorized. • Statistical test is called Goodness of Fit
  • 18. Goodness-of-Fit • Using sample data, the Chi-square test for goodness-of-fit tests whether obtained observations conform to or "fit" or diverge from the population proportions specified by a null hypothesis. • Goodness-of-fit points to the comparison of what pattern or distribution of frequencies would be anticipated due to chance versus the one that is actually obtained. • When the fit between “observed“ and “expected“ observations is good, then we know that the distribution of observation across the available categories is more or less equal. • When the discrepancy between observed and expected observations is sufficiently large, however, then a significant difference is likely to be found between or among the categories. • The departure of observed from expected results means that the fit is not " good,“ that some influential factors or factor is presumably causing it.
  • 19. Example to Illustrate • A statistics instructor asks the 35 students in her class to complete a standard course evaluation. One of the key questions of interest to this instructor was: • "Statistic was my favorite class this semester.“
  • 20. OBSERVED DATA Strongly agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly disagree 17 8 3 2 5 "Statistic was my favorite class this semester.“ (N = 35) Chi-square test statistic X² indicates whether there is a difference between some observed set of frequencies – the data drawn from a piece of research– and a set of expected frequencies. These expected frequencies constitute the predictions made under the null hypothesis.
  • 21. Steps for Testing a Hypothesis Using a Nonparametric Test 1. Verify that the data are based on a Nominal or an ordinal scale, not on an interval or a ratio scale 2. State the null (H0) and the alternative (H1) hypothesis 3. Select a significance level (p value or 𝛼 level) for the nonparametric test. 4. Perform the analyses using the statistic, determining whether to accept or reject (H0). Interpret and evaluate the results in light of the hypothesis, and if necessary, go to step 5. 5. Compute any supporting statistics
  • 22. Chi-Square test for Goodness-of-Fit • It involves: 2 forms • No frequency difference among a set of different categories • No frequency difference from a comparison population.
  • 23. Chi-Square test for Goodness-of-Fit • Ho: No difference in course ratings across the five rating categories ( i.e., strongly agree to strongly disagree ) • Because there are 35 students, the EXPECTED FREQUENCY for each category when no difference exists would 7 (35 ÷ 5 possible categories equals/ = 7 students in each one)
  • 24. EXPECTED DATA UNDER H0 Strongly agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly Disagree 7 7 7 7 7 The general rule of thumb for determining the expected frequencies for the chi- square test for goodness-of-fit test is simply dividing N by the number of available categories. The alternative hypothesis, then, is H1: There is statistically reliable difference between the observed and expected frequencies.
  • 25. COMPARISON DATA UNDER H0 STRONGLY AGREE AGREE UNDECIDED DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE 4 10 11 5 5 H0: No difference in course ratings from prior semester across the five rating categories (i.e., strongly agree to strongly disagree) H1: There is a statistically reliable difference between the observed and the comparison frequencies.
  • 26. Calculation for Test Statistic : CHI-SQUARE TEST X² = Σ (fo- fE)² fE
  • 27. Calculating X² Test Statistic Using a Tabular Format fo fE (fo-fE) (fo-fE) ² (fo-fE)²/fE Strongly agree 17 7 Agree 8 7 Uncertain 3 7 Disagree 2 7 Strongly disagree 5 7 Σfo = 35 ΣfE 35 Note: N = 35 (i.e., Σfo) respondents. These data are based on hypothetical responses to the statement “Statistics was my favorite class this semester.“
  • 28. Chi-square (X²) = 20.86 Dfx = K-1 ( The original rating scale is based on 5 categories, so the degree of freedom for this X² test statistic are): Dfx = 5-1 Dfx = 4. X² (4, N = 35) = 20.86, p < .05 [APA Style]