SlideShare a Scribd company logo
ISSN (e): 2250 – 3005 || Vol, 04 || Issue, 9 || September – 2014 || 
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research (IJCER) 
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 51 
Some Other Properties of Fuzzy Filters on Lattice Implication Algebras Priyanka Singh1, Amitabh Banerjee2, Purushotam Jha3 1Department of Engineering, ITM University Raipur(C.G) 2Department of Mathematics, Govt. D.B.Girls P.G.College Raipur(C.G) 3Department of Mathematics, Govt. J.Y.C.G.College Raipur(C.G) 
I. INTRODUCTION 
The concept of fuzzy set was introduced by zadeh[6]. Since then this concept has been Applied to other algebaric structure such as group, semigroup, ring, modules, vector space and topologies. With the development of fuzzy set, it is widely used in many fields. In order to research the logical system whose propositional value was given in a lattice , Xu. proposed the concept of lattice implication algebra and discussed their properties in [1]. Xu and Qin introduced the concept of filters and implicative filters in lattice implication algebra and investigate their properties in[2]. In [3] Xu. applied the concept of fuzzy sets to lattice implication algebra and proposed the notions of fuzzy filters and fuzzy implicative filters. In [7] [8] the notions of implicative filters, positive implicative and associative filters were studied. In[9][10] fuzzy filters, fuzzy positive implication and fuzzy associative filters were presented. In [11] Qin and Liu introduced a new class of filters known as v-Filters and they generated relation between v-filters and filters. Filter theory play an important role in studying the structure of algebra. In this paper we discuss several equivalent conditions for fuzzy filters are proved in lattice implication algebra. At the same time we discuss the relations of fuzzy filters and fuzzy implicative filters. 
II. PRELIMANARIES 
Definition 2.1. [5] A binary operator I : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is said to be an implication function or an implication if it satisfies; i) I(x, y) ≥ I(y, z) when x ≤ y, ∀z ∈ [0, 1]. ii) I(x, y) ≤ I(x, z) when y ≤ z, ∀x ∈ [0, 1]. iii) I(0, 0) = I(1, 1) = I(0, 1) and I(0, 1) = 0 etc. Definition 2.2. [1] Let (L, ∨, ∧, O, I)be a bounded lattice with an order-reversing involution ′ , I and O the greatest and smallest element of L respectively, and →: L × L → L be a mapping. (L, ∨, ∧,′ , O, I)) is called a quasi-lattice implication algebra if the following conditions hold for any x, y, z ∈ L (I1 ) x → (y → z) = y → (x → z); (I2 ) x → x = I; (I3 ) x → y = y → x; (I4 ) x → y = y → x = I implies x = y (I5 ) (x → y) → y = (y → x) → x Definition 2.3. [1] A quasi-lattice implication algebra is called a lattice implication al- gebra, if (I1 ) and (I2 ) hold for any x, y, z ∈ L (I1 ) (x ∨ y) → z = (x → z) ∧ (y → z); (I2 ) (x ∧ y) → z = (x → z) ∨ (y → z); 
ABSTRACT 
In this paper we discuss several properties of fuzzy filters are given in lattice implication algebra, the new equivalent conditions for fuzzy filters are also discuss in lattice implication algebra. 
KEYWORDS- Lattice implication algebra, fuzzy implication, filter, fuzzy implicative filter.
Some Other Properties Of Fuzzy… 
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 52 
Theorem 2.1. [1] Let L be a quasi-lattice implication algebra, then for any x, y, x ∈ L 1. If I → x = I, then x = I; 2. I → x = x and x → O = x; 3. O → x = I and x → I = I; 4. (x → y) → ((y → z) → (x → z)) = I Theorem 2.2. [1] Let L be a lattice implication algebra, then for any x, y ∈ L, x ≤ y if and only if x → y = I. Theorem 2.3. [1] Let L be a lattice implication algebra, then for any x, y, z ∈ L, x ≤ y , 1. (x → z) → (y → z) = y → (x ∨ z) = (z → x) → (y → x) 2. (z → x) → (z → y) = (x ∧ z) → y = (x → z) → (x → y). Theorem 2.4. [1] Let L be a lattice implication algebra, then for any x, y, z ∈ L, 1. z → (y → x) ≥ (z → y) → (z → x); 2. z ≤ y → x if and only if y ≤ z → x. Theorem 2.5. [1] Let L be lattice implication algebra then the following statements are equivalent; 1. For any x, y, z ∈ L, x → (y → z) = (x ∧ y) → z; 2. For any x, y ∈ L, x → (x → y) = x → y; 3. For any x, y, z ∈ L, (x → (y → z)) → ((x → y) → (x → z)) = I In lattice implication algebra L, we define binary operations ⊕ and ⊗ as follows: for any x, y ∈ L; x ⊗ y = (x → y ′ )′ ; x ⊕ y = x → y; Theorem 2.6. [1] Let L be a lattice implication algebra, then for any x, y, z ∈ L, 1. x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x, x ⊕ y = y ⊕ x; 2. x → (x ⊗ y) = x ∨ y = (x ⊕ y) → y; 3. (x → y) ⊗ x = x ∧ y; 4. x → (y → z) = (x ⊗ y) → z; 5. x → (y → z) if and only if x ⊗ y ≤ z; Definition 2.4. [2] A non-empty subset F of lattice implication algebra L is called a filter of L if it satisfies (F1 ) I ∈ F (F2 ) (∀x ∈ F )(∀y ∈ L)(x → y ∈ F ⇒ y ∈ F ) Definition 2.5. [3] A fuzzy set A of lattice implication algebra L is called a fuzzy filter of L if it satisfies (F3 ) (∀x ∈ L)(A(I) ≥ A(x)) (F4 ) (∀x, y ∈ L)(A(y) ≥ min{A(x), A(x → y)}) Definition 2.6. [3] Let L be a lattice implication algebra. A is a non-empty fuzzy set of L . A is called a fuzzy implicative filter of L if it satisfies: (F5 ) A(I) ≥ A(x) for any x ∈ L; (F6 ) A(x → z) ≥ min{A(x → y), A(x → (y → z))} for any x, y, z ∈ L Theorem 2.7. [3] Let L be a lattice implication algebra and A a fuzzy filter of L, then for any x, y ∈ L, x ≤ y implies A(x) ≤ A(y) III. PROPERTIES OF FUZZY FILTERS Theorem 3.1. [9] Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L if and only if it satisfies the following conditions; for any x, y, z ∈ L 1. A(x) ≤ A(I); 2. A(x → z) ≥ min{A(x → y), A(y → z)}.
Some Other Properties Of Fuzzy… 
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 53 
Theorem 3.2. [9] Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L if and only if it satisfies the following conditions; for any x, y, z ∈ L 1. A(x) ≤ A(I); 2. A(z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y), A(x → (y → z))}. Theorem 3.3. [9] Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L if and only if it satisfies the following conditions; for any x, y, z ∈ L 1. A(x) ≤ A(I); 2. A(z → x) ≥ min{A((z → y) → x), A(y)}. Theorem 3.4. [9] Let L be a lattice implication algebra and A be a fuzzy set of L, if A is a fuzzy implicative filter, the following statements are satisfied and equivalent: 1. A is a fuzzy filter for any x, y ∈ L, A(x → y) ≥ A(x → (x → y)); 2. A is a fuzzy filter and for any x, y, z ∈ L, A((x → y) → (x → z)) ≥ A(x → (y → z)) 3. A(x) ≤ A(I) and for any x, y, z ∈ L A(x → y) ≥ min{A(z → (x → (x → y))), A(z)} Theorem 3.5. [9] Let A be a fuzzy filter of L if x ≤ y → zfor any x, y, z ∈ L then A(z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y)} Corollary 3.1. [9] Let A be a fuzzy filter of L. If (x ⊗ y) → z = I for any x, y, z ∈ L, then A(z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y)}. Theorem 3.6. [9] Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L iff it satisfies the following conditions: for any x, y ∈ L. 1. If x ≤ y, then A(x) ≤ A(y); 2. A(x ⊗ y) ≥ min{A(x), A(y)} IV. SOME OTHER PROPERTIES OF FUZZY FILTERS Theorem 4.1. Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L iff it satisfies the following conditions, for any x, y, z ∈ L 1. A(x) ≤ A(I); 2. A(y → (x ∨ z)) ≥ min{A(x → z), A(x → z) → y))} Proof: Assume that A is a fuzzy filter of L. then (1) is trivial and for any x, y, z ∈ L (y → (x ∨ z)) ≥ min{A(x → z), A(x → z) → y)} by theorem 2.2 it can suffices to prove that (x → (x ∨ z)) → ((x → z) → y) = I for this = (y → (x ∨ z)) → ((x → z) → y) = ((z → x) → (y → x)) → ((x → x) → y) = ((z → y) → (z → y)) = I if x = I then (y → (x ∨ z)) ≥ ((x → z) → y) Then form theorem 2.6 hence A(y → (x ∨ z)) ≥ min{A(x → z), A((x → z) → y)} conversely by (1) and (2) it fol- lows that A(x) ≤ A(I) and for any x ∈ L By (2) it follows that for any x, y, z ∈ L if we take x = I then A(y) ≥ min(A(z), A(z → y)) Hence A is a fuzzy filter of L. Theorem 4.2. Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L iff it satisfies the following conditions for any x, y, z ∈ L 1. A(y) ≤ A(I) 2. A(y → z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y), A(x → (y → z))} Proof: Assume that A is a fuzzy filter of L, then (1) is trivial and for any x, y, z ∈ L A(y → z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y), A(x → (y → z))} By theorem 2.2 it can suffices to prove that
Some Other Properties Of Fuzzy… 
www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 54 
((x → (y → z)) → (y → z)) = I For this we have = ((x → (y → z)) → (y → z)) = ((x → z) → z if y = I = (x → (z → z) = (x → I) = I Then ((x → (y → z)) ≤ (y → z) Then form theorem 2.6 hence A((x → (y → z)) ≤ A(y → z) It follows that A(y → z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y), A(x → (y → z)} conversely by (1) and (2) it follows that A(x) ≤ A(I) and for any x ∈ L By (2) it follows that for any x, y, z ∈ L if we take y = I then A(z) ≥ {A(x), A(x → z))} Hence A is a fuzzy filter of L. Theorem 4.3. Let A is a fuzzy filter of L, if x ≤ y for any x, y ∈ L then 1. A(x) ≤ A(I) 2. A(x ∨ y) ≥ min{A(x), A(x ⊕ y)} Proof:Suppose that A is a fuzzy filter of L then (1) is trivial any for any x, y ∈ L A(x ∨ y) ≥ min{A(x), A(x ⊕ y)} for this we have to show that (x → (x ⊕ y)) → (x ∨ y) = I By theorem 2.2 . Hence = (x ⊕ y) → (x → (x ∨ y)) = (x ⊕ y) → ((y → x) → (x → x)) By theorem 2.3, and = (x ⊕ y) → ((y → x) → I) = (x ⊕ y) → (y → (x → I)) = (x ⊕ y) → (y → I) By theorem 2.1 and = (x ⊕ y) → I by theorem 2.5 and = (x → y) → I because x ≤ y hence (x → (x ⊕ y)) → (x ∨ y) = I this implies that (x ⊕ y) ≤ (x → (x ∨ y)) Then by theorem 2.2 we get A(x ⊕ y) ≤ A(x → (x ∨ y)) A(x → (x ∨ y)) ≥ min{A(x ⊕ y)} by theorem 2.7 Hence A(x ∨ y) ≥ min{A(x), A(x ⊕ y)}. V. CONCLUSION In this paper we define some other equivalent conditions for fuzzy filters in lattice implication algebra.The relation between fuzzy filters and fuzzy implicative filters are also defined, and we also prove that fuzzy implicative filters are fuzzy filters in lattice implication algebra. REFERENCES [1] Y.Xu, Lattice implication algebra, J.Southwest Liaotong Univ. 1, pp. 20-27,1993. [2] Y.Xu, K.Y.Qin, On filters of lattice implication algebras, J. Fuzzy Math. 1:251-260, 1993. [3] Y.Xu, K.Y.Qin, Fuzzy lattice implication algebras, J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ. 30:121-127,1995. [4] Lukasiewicz, J : Interpretaejaliczbowateoriizda’n Ruchfilzoficzny 7:92-98,1923. [5] Benjam’In C. Bedregal et.al. : Xor-implications and E- implications b: classes of fuzzy implications based on fuzzy xor,2008. [6] Zadeh, L.A. : Fuzzy sets. Infor and Control 8:94-102,1965. [7] Y.B.Jun, Implicative filters of lattice implication algebra, Bull. Korean Math. Soc.34(2):193-198, 1997. [8] Y.B.Jun, Y.Xu, K.Y.Qin, Positive implicative and associative filters of lattice impli- cation algebras, Bull. Korean Math. Soc 35(1):53-61,1998. [9] K.Y.Qin, Y.Xu, On some properties of fuzzy filters of lattice implication algebra, Liu. Y.M.(Ed.)Fuzzy set Theory and its Application. Press of Hebi University, Baoding, China,179-182,1998. [10] Y.B.Jun, Fuzzy positive implicative and fuzzy associative filters of lattice implication algebras, Fuzzy sets an systems. 121:353- 357,2001. 
[11] Y.Qin, Y.Liu, v-Filters on Lattice Implication Algebras,Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences.3(9):1298-1301,2012.

More Related Content

PDF
Fuzzy Group Ideals and Rings
PDF
Intuitionistic Fuzzification of T-Ideals in Bci-Algebras
PDF
OrthogonalFunctionsPaper
PDF
Partial Differential Equation - Notes
PDF
Summer Proj.
PDF
Common fixed point theorems with continuously subcompatible mappings in fuzz...
PDF
11.a focus on a common fixed point theorem using weakly compatible mappings
PDF
A focus on a common fixed point theorem using weakly compatible mappings
Fuzzy Group Ideals and Rings
Intuitionistic Fuzzification of T-Ideals in Bci-Algebras
OrthogonalFunctionsPaper
Partial Differential Equation - Notes
Summer Proj.
Common fixed point theorems with continuously subcompatible mappings in fuzz...
11.a focus on a common fixed point theorem using weakly compatible mappings
A focus on a common fixed point theorem using weakly compatible mappings

What's hot (17)

PDF
a - ANTI FUZZY NEW IDEAL OF PUALGEBRA
PDF
Common fixed theorems for weakly compatible mappings via an
PDF
Some Operation Equation and Applications
PDF
FUZZY IDEALS AND FUZZY DOT IDEALS ON BH-ALGEBRAS
PPT
Partial Differentiation & Application
PDF
Active Controller Design for Regulating the Output of the Sprott-P System
PDF
On fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric spaces
PDF
Flip bifurcation and chaos control in discrete-time Prey-predator model
PDF
Some fixed point theorems in fuzzy mappings
PDF
Lesson 11: Limits and Continuity
PDF
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces in integral type
DOCX
Term paper inna_tarasyan
PDF
Properties of fuzzy inner product spaces
PDF
Oral Exam Slides
PDF
6 adesh kumar tripathi -71-74
a - ANTI FUZZY NEW IDEAL OF PUALGEBRA
Common fixed theorems for weakly compatible mappings via an
Some Operation Equation and Applications
FUZZY IDEALS AND FUZZY DOT IDEALS ON BH-ALGEBRAS
Partial Differentiation & Application
Active Controller Design for Regulating the Output of the Sprott-P System
On fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric spaces
Flip bifurcation and chaos control in discrete-time Prey-predator model
Some fixed point theorems in fuzzy mappings
Lesson 11: Limits and Continuity
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces in integral type
Term paper inna_tarasyan
Properties of fuzzy inner product spaces
Oral Exam Slides
6 adesh kumar tripathi -71-74
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Fuzzy Logic Ppt
PPT
Fuzzy logic mtech project in jalandhar
PPTX
Fuzzy logic
PPT
Fuzzy Logic
PPT
Fuzzy causal order
PPTX
Fuzzy Sets Introduction With Example
PDF
Fuzzy Logic in the Real World
PPT
Fuzzy logic
PPTX
Fuzzy mathematics:An application oriented introduction
PPTX
Chapter 5 - Fuzzy Logic
PPT
Fuzzy logic ppt
PPT
Fuzzy logic-introduction
PDF
T2 fs talk
PPT
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence
PDF
A decision support system for tuberculosis
PPTX
Fuzzy logic
PDF
Roughset & it’s variants
PPTX
Fuzzy sets
PPT
Fuzzy logic and fuzzy time series edited
Fuzzy Logic Ppt
Fuzzy logic mtech project in jalandhar
Fuzzy logic
Fuzzy Logic
Fuzzy causal order
Fuzzy Sets Introduction With Example
Fuzzy Logic in the Real World
Fuzzy logic
Fuzzy mathematics:An application oriented introduction
Chapter 5 - Fuzzy Logic
Fuzzy logic ppt
Fuzzy logic-introduction
T2 fs talk
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence
A decision support system for tuberculosis
Fuzzy logic
Roughset & it’s variants
Fuzzy sets
Fuzzy logic and fuzzy time series edited
Ad

Similar to Some Other Properties of Fuzzy Filters on Lattice Implication Algebras (20)

PDF
9. MA Hashemi.pdf
PDF
9. MA Hashemi.pdf
PDF
Aj24247254
PDF
Journal of mathematical analysis and applications
PDF
Doubt intuitionistic fuzzy deals in bckbci algebras
PDF
DOUBT INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY IDEALS IN BCK/BCI-ALGEBRAS
PDF
IRJET - Some Results on Fuzzy Semi-Super Modular Lattices
PDF
Solvability of system of intuitionistic fuzzy linear equations
PDF
Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy homomorphism of bf algebras
PDF
Distributavity
 
PDF
An implicit partial pivoting gauss elimination algorithm for linear system of...
PDF
Residual Quotient and Annihilator of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of Ring and Mo...
PPTX
Fuzzy logic
PDF
11.[1 7]fuzzy join prime semi l-ideals
PDF
11.fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
PDF
Fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
PPT
Fuzzy logic in approximate Reasoning
PDF
IRJET- Soft Hyperfilters in Hyperlattices
PDF
Using Alpha-cuts and Constraint Exploration Approach on Quadratic Programming...
PDF
APPROXIMATE CONTROLLABILITY RESULTS FOR IMPULSIVE LINEAR FUZZY STOCHASTIC DIF...
9. MA Hashemi.pdf
9. MA Hashemi.pdf
Aj24247254
Journal of mathematical analysis and applications
Doubt intuitionistic fuzzy deals in bckbci algebras
DOUBT INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY IDEALS IN BCK/BCI-ALGEBRAS
IRJET - Some Results on Fuzzy Semi-Super Modular Lattices
Solvability of system of intuitionistic fuzzy linear equations
Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy homomorphism of bf algebras
Distributavity
 
An implicit partial pivoting gauss elimination algorithm for linear system of...
Residual Quotient and Annihilator of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of Ring and Mo...
Fuzzy logic
11.[1 7]fuzzy join prime semi l-ideals
11.fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
Fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
Fuzzy logic in approximate Reasoning
IRJET- Soft Hyperfilters in Hyperlattices
Using Alpha-cuts and Constraint Exploration Approach on Quadratic Programming...
APPROXIMATE CONTROLLABILITY RESULTS FOR IMPULSIVE LINEAR FUZZY STOCHASTIC DIF...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
PDF
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
PPTX
1. Introduction to Computer Programming.pptx
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PDF
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
PDF
A comparative study of natural language inference in Swahili using monolingua...
PDF
WOOl fibre morphology and structure.pdf for textiles
PDF
Mushroom cultivation and it's methods.pdf
PPTX
cloud_computing_Infrastucture_as_cloud_p
PPTX
A Presentation on Touch Screen Technology
PDF
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
PDF
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
PDF
Transform Your ITIL® 4 & ITSM Strategy with AI in 2025.pdf
PDF
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
PDF
Hindi spoken digit analysis for native and non-native speakers
PDF
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
PDF
August Patch Tuesday
PDF
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
PDF
Getting Started with Data Integration: FME Form 101
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
1. Introduction to Computer Programming.pptx
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
A comparative study of natural language inference in Swahili using monolingua...
WOOl fibre morphology and structure.pdf for textiles
Mushroom cultivation and it's methods.pdf
cloud_computing_Infrastucture_as_cloud_p
A Presentation on Touch Screen Technology
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
Transform Your ITIL® 4 & ITSM Strategy with AI in 2025.pdf
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
Hindi spoken digit analysis for native and non-native speakers
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
August Patch Tuesday
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
Getting Started with Data Integration: FME Form 101

Some Other Properties of Fuzzy Filters on Lattice Implication Algebras

  • 1. ISSN (e): 2250 – 3005 || Vol, 04 || Issue, 9 || September – 2014 || International Journal of Computational Engineering Research (IJCER) www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 51 Some Other Properties of Fuzzy Filters on Lattice Implication Algebras Priyanka Singh1, Amitabh Banerjee2, Purushotam Jha3 1Department of Engineering, ITM University Raipur(C.G) 2Department of Mathematics, Govt. D.B.Girls P.G.College Raipur(C.G) 3Department of Mathematics, Govt. J.Y.C.G.College Raipur(C.G) I. INTRODUCTION The concept of fuzzy set was introduced by zadeh[6]. Since then this concept has been Applied to other algebaric structure such as group, semigroup, ring, modules, vector space and topologies. With the development of fuzzy set, it is widely used in many fields. In order to research the logical system whose propositional value was given in a lattice , Xu. proposed the concept of lattice implication algebra and discussed their properties in [1]. Xu and Qin introduced the concept of filters and implicative filters in lattice implication algebra and investigate their properties in[2]. In [3] Xu. applied the concept of fuzzy sets to lattice implication algebra and proposed the notions of fuzzy filters and fuzzy implicative filters. In [7] [8] the notions of implicative filters, positive implicative and associative filters were studied. In[9][10] fuzzy filters, fuzzy positive implication and fuzzy associative filters were presented. In [11] Qin and Liu introduced a new class of filters known as v-Filters and they generated relation between v-filters and filters. Filter theory play an important role in studying the structure of algebra. In this paper we discuss several equivalent conditions for fuzzy filters are proved in lattice implication algebra. At the same time we discuss the relations of fuzzy filters and fuzzy implicative filters. II. PRELIMANARIES Definition 2.1. [5] A binary operator I : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is said to be an implication function or an implication if it satisfies; i) I(x, y) ≥ I(y, z) when x ≤ y, ∀z ∈ [0, 1]. ii) I(x, y) ≤ I(x, z) when y ≤ z, ∀x ∈ [0, 1]. iii) I(0, 0) = I(1, 1) = I(0, 1) and I(0, 1) = 0 etc. Definition 2.2. [1] Let (L, ∨, ∧, O, I)be a bounded lattice with an order-reversing involution ′ , I and O the greatest and smallest element of L respectively, and →: L × L → L be a mapping. (L, ∨, ∧,′ , O, I)) is called a quasi-lattice implication algebra if the following conditions hold for any x, y, z ∈ L (I1 ) x → (y → z) = y → (x → z); (I2 ) x → x = I; (I3 ) x → y = y → x; (I4 ) x → y = y → x = I implies x = y (I5 ) (x → y) → y = (y → x) → x Definition 2.3. [1] A quasi-lattice implication algebra is called a lattice implication al- gebra, if (I1 ) and (I2 ) hold for any x, y, z ∈ L (I1 ) (x ∨ y) → z = (x → z) ∧ (y → z); (I2 ) (x ∧ y) → z = (x → z) ∨ (y → z); ABSTRACT In this paper we discuss several properties of fuzzy filters are given in lattice implication algebra, the new equivalent conditions for fuzzy filters are also discuss in lattice implication algebra. KEYWORDS- Lattice implication algebra, fuzzy implication, filter, fuzzy implicative filter.
  • 2. Some Other Properties Of Fuzzy… www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 52 Theorem 2.1. [1] Let L be a quasi-lattice implication algebra, then for any x, y, x ∈ L 1. If I → x = I, then x = I; 2. I → x = x and x → O = x; 3. O → x = I and x → I = I; 4. (x → y) → ((y → z) → (x → z)) = I Theorem 2.2. [1] Let L be a lattice implication algebra, then for any x, y ∈ L, x ≤ y if and only if x → y = I. Theorem 2.3. [1] Let L be a lattice implication algebra, then for any x, y, z ∈ L, x ≤ y , 1. (x → z) → (y → z) = y → (x ∨ z) = (z → x) → (y → x) 2. (z → x) → (z → y) = (x ∧ z) → y = (x → z) → (x → y). Theorem 2.4. [1] Let L be a lattice implication algebra, then for any x, y, z ∈ L, 1. z → (y → x) ≥ (z → y) → (z → x); 2. z ≤ y → x if and only if y ≤ z → x. Theorem 2.5. [1] Let L be lattice implication algebra then the following statements are equivalent; 1. For any x, y, z ∈ L, x → (y → z) = (x ∧ y) → z; 2. For any x, y ∈ L, x → (x → y) = x → y; 3. For any x, y, z ∈ L, (x → (y → z)) → ((x → y) → (x → z)) = I In lattice implication algebra L, we define binary operations ⊕ and ⊗ as follows: for any x, y ∈ L; x ⊗ y = (x → y ′ )′ ; x ⊕ y = x → y; Theorem 2.6. [1] Let L be a lattice implication algebra, then for any x, y, z ∈ L, 1. x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x, x ⊕ y = y ⊕ x; 2. x → (x ⊗ y) = x ∨ y = (x ⊕ y) → y; 3. (x → y) ⊗ x = x ∧ y; 4. x → (y → z) = (x ⊗ y) → z; 5. x → (y → z) if and only if x ⊗ y ≤ z; Definition 2.4. [2] A non-empty subset F of lattice implication algebra L is called a filter of L if it satisfies (F1 ) I ∈ F (F2 ) (∀x ∈ F )(∀y ∈ L)(x → y ∈ F ⇒ y ∈ F ) Definition 2.5. [3] A fuzzy set A of lattice implication algebra L is called a fuzzy filter of L if it satisfies (F3 ) (∀x ∈ L)(A(I) ≥ A(x)) (F4 ) (∀x, y ∈ L)(A(y) ≥ min{A(x), A(x → y)}) Definition 2.6. [3] Let L be a lattice implication algebra. A is a non-empty fuzzy set of L . A is called a fuzzy implicative filter of L if it satisfies: (F5 ) A(I) ≥ A(x) for any x ∈ L; (F6 ) A(x → z) ≥ min{A(x → y), A(x → (y → z))} for any x, y, z ∈ L Theorem 2.7. [3] Let L be a lattice implication algebra and A a fuzzy filter of L, then for any x, y ∈ L, x ≤ y implies A(x) ≤ A(y) III. PROPERTIES OF FUZZY FILTERS Theorem 3.1. [9] Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L if and only if it satisfies the following conditions; for any x, y, z ∈ L 1. A(x) ≤ A(I); 2. A(x → z) ≥ min{A(x → y), A(y → z)}.
  • 3. Some Other Properties Of Fuzzy… www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 53 Theorem 3.2. [9] Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L if and only if it satisfies the following conditions; for any x, y, z ∈ L 1. A(x) ≤ A(I); 2. A(z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y), A(x → (y → z))}. Theorem 3.3. [9] Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L if and only if it satisfies the following conditions; for any x, y, z ∈ L 1. A(x) ≤ A(I); 2. A(z → x) ≥ min{A((z → y) → x), A(y)}. Theorem 3.4. [9] Let L be a lattice implication algebra and A be a fuzzy set of L, if A is a fuzzy implicative filter, the following statements are satisfied and equivalent: 1. A is a fuzzy filter for any x, y ∈ L, A(x → y) ≥ A(x → (x → y)); 2. A is a fuzzy filter and for any x, y, z ∈ L, A((x → y) → (x → z)) ≥ A(x → (y → z)) 3. A(x) ≤ A(I) and for any x, y, z ∈ L A(x → y) ≥ min{A(z → (x → (x → y))), A(z)} Theorem 3.5. [9] Let A be a fuzzy filter of L if x ≤ y → zfor any x, y, z ∈ L then A(z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y)} Corollary 3.1. [9] Let A be a fuzzy filter of L. If (x ⊗ y) → z = I for any x, y, z ∈ L, then A(z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y)}. Theorem 3.6. [9] Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L iff it satisfies the following conditions: for any x, y ∈ L. 1. If x ≤ y, then A(x) ≤ A(y); 2. A(x ⊗ y) ≥ min{A(x), A(y)} IV. SOME OTHER PROPERTIES OF FUZZY FILTERS Theorem 4.1. Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L iff it satisfies the following conditions, for any x, y, z ∈ L 1. A(x) ≤ A(I); 2. A(y → (x ∨ z)) ≥ min{A(x → z), A(x → z) → y))} Proof: Assume that A is a fuzzy filter of L. then (1) is trivial and for any x, y, z ∈ L (y → (x ∨ z)) ≥ min{A(x → z), A(x → z) → y)} by theorem 2.2 it can suffices to prove that (x → (x ∨ z)) → ((x → z) → y) = I for this = (y → (x ∨ z)) → ((x → z) → y) = ((z → x) → (y → x)) → ((x → x) → y) = ((z → y) → (z → y)) = I if x = I then (y → (x ∨ z)) ≥ ((x → z) → y) Then form theorem 2.6 hence A(y → (x ∨ z)) ≥ min{A(x → z), A((x → z) → y)} conversely by (1) and (2) it fol- lows that A(x) ≤ A(I) and for any x ∈ L By (2) it follows that for any x, y, z ∈ L if we take x = I then A(y) ≥ min(A(z), A(z → y)) Hence A is a fuzzy filter of L. Theorem 4.2. Let A be a fuzzy set of L. A is a fuzzy filter of L iff it satisfies the following conditions for any x, y, z ∈ L 1. A(y) ≤ A(I) 2. A(y → z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y), A(x → (y → z))} Proof: Assume that A is a fuzzy filter of L, then (1) is trivial and for any x, y, z ∈ L A(y → z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y), A(x → (y → z))} By theorem 2.2 it can suffices to prove that
  • 4. Some Other Properties Of Fuzzy… www.ijceronline.com Open Access Journal Page 54 ((x → (y → z)) → (y → z)) = I For this we have = ((x → (y → z)) → (y → z)) = ((x → z) → z if y = I = (x → (z → z) = (x → I) = I Then ((x → (y → z)) ≤ (y → z) Then form theorem 2.6 hence A((x → (y → z)) ≤ A(y → z) It follows that A(y → z) ≥ min{A(x), A(y), A(x → (y → z)} conversely by (1) and (2) it follows that A(x) ≤ A(I) and for any x ∈ L By (2) it follows that for any x, y, z ∈ L if we take y = I then A(z) ≥ {A(x), A(x → z))} Hence A is a fuzzy filter of L. Theorem 4.3. Let A is a fuzzy filter of L, if x ≤ y for any x, y ∈ L then 1. A(x) ≤ A(I) 2. A(x ∨ y) ≥ min{A(x), A(x ⊕ y)} Proof:Suppose that A is a fuzzy filter of L then (1) is trivial any for any x, y ∈ L A(x ∨ y) ≥ min{A(x), A(x ⊕ y)} for this we have to show that (x → (x ⊕ y)) → (x ∨ y) = I By theorem 2.2 . Hence = (x ⊕ y) → (x → (x ∨ y)) = (x ⊕ y) → ((y → x) → (x → x)) By theorem 2.3, and = (x ⊕ y) → ((y → x) → I) = (x ⊕ y) → (y → (x → I)) = (x ⊕ y) → (y → I) By theorem 2.1 and = (x ⊕ y) → I by theorem 2.5 and = (x → y) → I because x ≤ y hence (x → (x ⊕ y)) → (x ∨ y) = I this implies that (x ⊕ y) ≤ (x → (x ∨ y)) Then by theorem 2.2 we get A(x ⊕ y) ≤ A(x → (x ∨ y)) A(x → (x ∨ y)) ≥ min{A(x ⊕ y)} by theorem 2.7 Hence A(x ∨ y) ≥ min{A(x), A(x ⊕ y)}. V. CONCLUSION In this paper we define some other equivalent conditions for fuzzy filters in lattice implication algebra.The relation between fuzzy filters and fuzzy implicative filters are also defined, and we also prove that fuzzy implicative filters are fuzzy filters in lattice implication algebra. REFERENCES [1] Y.Xu, Lattice implication algebra, J.Southwest Liaotong Univ. 1, pp. 20-27,1993. [2] Y.Xu, K.Y.Qin, On filters of lattice implication algebras, J. Fuzzy Math. 1:251-260, 1993. [3] Y.Xu, K.Y.Qin, Fuzzy lattice implication algebras, J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ. 30:121-127,1995. [4] Lukasiewicz, J : Interpretaejaliczbowateoriizda’n Ruchfilzoficzny 7:92-98,1923. [5] Benjam’In C. Bedregal et.al. : Xor-implications and E- implications b: classes of fuzzy implications based on fuzzy xor,2008. [6] Zadeh, L.A. : Fuzzy sets. Infor and Control 8:94-102,1965. [7] Y.B.Jun, Implicative filters of lattice implication algebra, Bull. Korean Math. Soc.34(2):193-198, 1997. [8] Y.B.Jun, Y.Xu, K.Y.Qin, Positive implicative and associative filters of lattice impli- cation algebras, Bull. Korean Math. Soc 35(1):53-61,1998. [9] K.Y.Qin, Y.Xu, On some properties of fuzzy filters of lattice implication algebra, Liu. Y.M.(Ed.)Fuzzy set Theory and its Application. Press of Hebi University, Baoding, China,179-182,1998. [10] Y.B.Jun, Fuzzy positive implicative and fuzzy associative filters of lattice implication algebras, Fuzzy sets an systems. 121:353- 357,2001. [11] Y.Qin, Y.Liu, v-Filters on Lattice Implication Algebras,Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences.3(9):1298-1301,2012.