SlideShare a Scribd company logo
A Quick Chat about two of many Service-Oriented
     Modeling Framework (SOMF) Capabilities:
             Simplicity and Traceability




For Architects, Business Analysts, Developers, Software Modelers, Data Modelers,
                          Team Leaders, and Managers




 SOMF is used for Enterprise Architecture, Application Architecture,
Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA), and Cloud Computing Projects




       SOMF is empowered by Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Simplicity
Think about how often we try to explain in simple words how a
software entity is linked to another, describe dependencies of one
component on others, or illustrate the affiliation between applications
in a production environment.

So, here is how the service-oriented modeling framework (SOMF)
advocates expressing coupling between two software entities:




Easy? Yes, this is simple because SOMF both promotes simplicity and
enables architects, managers, analysts, modelers, and developers to
communicate by employing a simple language. In this case, we use
the “Coupled” symbol to indicate software coupling.

Another example: How can we describe the containment of one
software component within another? This is simple to illustrate. See
the example below:
In the above example, Component 2 (parent) aggregates component
2.1 (child) by using the “Aggregated” symbol. Note that the plus sign
that is enclosed in a circle points to the parent component –
Component 2.

And how do we separate an aggregated entity? This is also simple to
illustrate.




In the above diagram Component 2.1 (child) is separated from its
parent aggregating entity by employing the “Decoupled” symbol.
Again, note that the fork-like symbol points to the parent Component
2.

Finally, how do we signify a binding contract between a service
provider and its corresponding consumer? This is really easy to do.
See the below diagram that is employing the “Bound” symbol to tie
two software entities (Component 1 and Component 2) by a stipulated
contract.
SOMF Capabilities - Quick Chat
Traceability
Next, if you want to illustrate past relationships between two software
pieces employ the SOMF “Decoupled” symbol, just a you see in the
below diagram.




Traceability of software architecture is the reason. In this case, SOMF
calls for preserving past implementation decisions and allows
traceability of architecture best practices and even expenditure.

So let us take a look at an architecture traceability example below.
Here the reason for separating Component 1 (child) from its parent
Component 2 is indicated in the comment box: “Architecture Best
Practice: Component 2 is too coarse-grained”. Component 2.1,
however, is still aggregated in its parent Component 2.
Business traceability can also be expressed by employing this method.
Note that the below diagram indicates that the cost of software entity
separation is $5,000.
To learn more about many SOMF capabilities, modeling methods and
formal notation, and patterns for enterprise architecture, service-
oriented architecture (SOA), and Cloud Computing refer to these
books:

More Related Content

PDF
SOA Modeling Patterns - SOMF
PDF
What is SOMF? What is Service-Oriented Modeling?
PDF
Service-Oriented Modeling Language
PDF
Service-Oriented Modeling Strategy and Approach
PPT
EA as an Actionable Architecture
PDF
Learn BEM: CSS Naming Convention
PDF
SEO: Getting Personal
PPTX
Domain driven design
SOA Modeling Patterns - SOMF
What is SOMF? What is Service-Oriented Modeling?
Service-Oriented Modeling Language
Service-Oriented Modeling Strategy and Approach
EA as an Actionable Architecture
Learn BEM: CSS Naming Convention
SEO: Getting Personal
Domain driven design

Similar to SOMF Capabilities - Quick Chat (20)

PDF
Togaf 9.1 basic concepts
PDF
Soa Next Generation
PDF
SOA Next Generation V1.1
PDF
Framework Engineering
PPTX
SOA Course - Next Generation
PPTX
Togaf introduction and core concepts
PPTX
SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE Software.pptx
PPTX
Chapter 3 UML Structured Diagrams.pptx
PPT
Ooad
PPTX
Microservices Architecture
PPTX
SOA (Service Oriented Architecture)
PPT
How to Build TOGAF Architectures With System Architect (2).ppt
PPTX
Itp oo mand-d
PDF
Software Architecture Document Final
PDF
PPTX
Visualize your architecture and information
PPTX
Togaf 9.2 Introduction
PDF
UML-Advanced Software Engineering
PPT
01 concepts of_object-orientation (1)
PDF
Axel uhl sap@md-day2011
Togaf 9.1 basic concepts
Soa Next Generation
SOA Next Generation V1.1
Framework Engineering
SOA Course - Next Generation
Togaf introduction and core concepts
SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE Software.pptx
Chapter 3 UML Structured Diagrams.pptx
Ooad
Microservices Architecture
SOA (Service Oriented Architecture)
How to Build TOGAF Architectures With System Architect (2).ppt
Itp oo mand-d
Software Architecture Document Final
Visualize your architecture and information
Togaf 9.2 Introduction
UML-Advanced Software Engineering
01 concepts of_object-orientation (1)
Axel uhl sap@md-day2011
Ad

SOMF Capabilities - Quick Chat

  • 1. A Quick Chat about two of many Service-Oriented Modeling Framework (SOMF) Capabilities: Simplicity and Traceability For Architects, Business Analysts, Developers, Software Modelers, Data Modelers, Team Leaders, and Managers SOMF is used for Enterprise Architecture, Application Architecture, Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA), and Cloud Computing Projects SOMF is empowered by Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
  • 2. Simplicity Think about how often we try to explain in simple words how a software entity is linked to another, describe dependencies of one component on others, or illustrate the affiliation between applications in a production environment. So, here is how the service-oriented modeling framework (SOMF) advocates expressing coupling between two software entities: Easy? Yes, this is simple because SOMF both promotes simplicity and enables architects, managers, analysts, modelers, and developers to communicate by employing a simple language. In this case, we use the “Coupled” symbol to indicate software coupling. Another example: How can we describe the containment of one software component within another? This is simple to illustrate. See the example below:
  • 3. In the above example, Component 2 (parent) aggregates component 2.1 (child) by using the “Aggregated” symbol. Note that the plus sign that is enclosed in a circle points to the parent component – Component 2. And how do we separate an aggregated entity? This is also simple to illustrate. In the above diagram Component 2.1 (child) is separated from its parent aggregating entity by employing the “Decoupled” symbol. Again, note that the fork-like symbol points to the parent Component 2. Finally, how do we signify a binding contract between a service provider and its corresponding consumer? This is really easy to do. See the below diagram that is employing the “Bound” symbol to tie two software entities (Component 1 and Component 2) by a stipulated contract.
  • 5. Traceability Next, if you want to illustrate past relationships between two software pieces employ the SOMF “Decoupled” symbol, just a you see in the below diagram. Traceability of software architecture is the reason. In this case, SOMF calls for preserving past implementation decisions and allows traceability of architecture best practices and even expenditure. So let us take a look at an architecture traceability example below. Here the reason for separating Component 1 (child) from its parent Component 2 is indicated in the comment box: “Architecture Best Practice: Component 2 is too coarse-grained”. Component 2.1, however, is still aggregated in its parent Component 2.
  • 6. Business traceability can also be expressed by employing this method. Note that the below diagram indicates that the cost of software entity separation is $5,000.
  • 7. To learn more about many SOMF capabilities, modeling methods and formal notation, and patterns for enterprise architecture, service- oriented architecture (SOA), and Cloud Computing refer to these books: