SlideShare a Scribd company logo
2
Most read
3
Most read
4
Most read
Paul Pasco, BA, BS, PharmD Candidate
12 March 2022
Source: U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings with Sponsors for Drugs and Biological
Products. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; 2020:1-13. Accessed March 11, 2022.
https://www.fda.gov/media/124044/download
Page 1 of 4
Summary of FDA CBER SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings with Sponsors
for Drugs and Biological Products
FDA CBER SOPP 8214, found here, outlines the INTERACT process used by FDA CBER. Text in yellow is
important for the candidate product. Text in green is critical for the candidate product. Major areas of
discussion are bolded in red.
o Overview of INTERACT:
• INTERACT = INitial Targeted Engagement for Regulatory Advice on CBER producTs.
• Used to provide preliminary, informal, and non-binding guidance to sponsors on a specific
product in early-stage development.
o Inquiries for formal meetings (e.g., pre-IND meeting) should be relegated to FDA CBER
SOPP 8101.1: Regulatory Meetings with Sponsors and Applicants for Drugs and
Biological Products here.
• Early-stage development is defined as NOT being sufficiently developed to meet criteria for a
pre-IND meeting.
• Participation in INTERACT is optional.
o NOT a substitute (or a prerequisite) for a pre-IND meeting. A pre-IND meeting will still
be required at the appropriate time.
o That is, the INTERACT process is NOT required during the FDA approval process for a
candidate product to be approved.
o Purpose of INTERACT:
• Will highlight required elements in early-phase clinical trials (i.e., phase I).
• Will identify critical issues or deficiencies for sponsors to address in the development of the
candidate product.
o Scope of INTERACT:
• Intended for novel products with unknown safety profiles.
• May include questions about chemistry, manufacturing, and controls; pharmacology/toxicology;
and/or other clinical aspects of development. This includes:
o Specific questions on the adequacy of selected animal models, study design (e.g.,
appropriate endpoints).
o Acceptability of preclinical testing strategies.
o Modifications to preclinical study design.
o ***Providing recommendations for further development of an early-stage product for
which limited data have been collected outside of a U.S. IND.***
• Exclusion criteria:
o Only appropriate if the sponsor has an identified product.
o If the sponsor has not begun developing a specific product, or there are multiple
products under consideration, INTERACT is not appropriate.
o ***If the sponsor has questions about the adequacy and/or design of definitive
preclinical toxicology studies, an INTERACT meeting is NOT appropriate. Such
questions would be addressed during a pre-IND meeting instead.***
Paul Pasco, BA, BS, PharmD Candidate
12 March 2022
Source: U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings with Sponsors for Drugs and Biological
Products. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; 2020:1-13. Accessed March 11, 2022.
https://www.fda.gov/media/124044/download
Page 2 of 4
o Questions about specific aspects of clinical study design, rather than preclinical (e.g.,
inclusion criteria). Such topics would be reviewed at a pre-IND meeting.
o If an INTERACT request is submitted under the above circumstances, the FDA will deny
the request to meet. More appropriate alternatives will be suggested.
o Unless the product has not begun development or the sponsor is considering multiple
products, any other denial of meeting requests will be predicated on a substantive
reason.
▪ Missing a minor component of the meeting request or package, described
further below, is not a substantive reason.
▪ Significant deficiencies in the request or package, such as no questions
identified, lack of a package, or multiple omissions in the one provided, would
constitute substantive reasons.
▪ Meeting requests may be denied if a different type of meeting would be more
appropriate. This may occur if product development is too advanced at this
stage.
o General requirements of INTERACT:
• The sponsor must read SOPP 8214 in preparation for any INTERACT communications (e.g.,
meeting request, submission of meeting package, live meeting).
• If held, the live meeting may NOT be electronically recorded.
• To begin the process of communicating with FDA CBER, requests to establish a secure email
connection should be addressed to SecureEmail@fda.hhs.gov. This is not the time to request an
INTERACT meeting. This is to establish communication only.
o Once a secure email relationship has been established, a formal request for an
INTERACT meeting may be submitted.
o Questions about this may be relegated to SOPP 8119: Use of Email for Regulatory
Communications here.
o Timeline of INTERACT:
• Goals:
o Schedule INTERACT meetings within 21-calendar days of requests.
o Hold live meetings within 90-calendar days of requests.
• The provided time frames are not obligatory for CBER. Actual timeline may be longer subject to
CBER availability.
o Structure of INTERACT: 2 main components.
• (1) A pre-meeting review of documents.
o The collection of these documents is called the “meeting package.”
o There are strict requirements for the documents submitted. This includes the types of
documents, total volume of documents, focused questions for CBER review, and other
elements of the meeting package addressed more fully below.
o Once the meeting package is submitted, CBER issues a written response to each
question posed.
• (2) A live discussion.
o The sponsor may be fully satisfied with the written responses. If so, the sponsor may
send a written request to CBER to cancel the live meeting. CBER comments will be
provided to the sponsor no later than 1-calendar day prior to the live meeting.
Paul Pasco, BA, BS, PharmD Candidate
12 March 2022
Source: U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings with Sponsors for Drugs and Biological
Products. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; 2020:1-13. Accessed March 11, 2022.
https://www.fda.gov/media/124044/download
Page 3 of 4
o If not fully satisfied, the sponsor may elect to review the responses with FDA CBER staff
in a live meeting. This meeting will provide additional clarification about specific
questions submitted previously in writing as part of the meeting package. No new
questions may be posed.
o Only available via teleconference. Lasts approximately 1-hour.
o Requirements for meeting requests, packages, and live meeting:
• Address all meeting package materials to INTERACT-CBER@fda.hhs.gov.
• With consideration of their complexity, all questions submitted in a single INTERACT meeting
request must be capable of being reasonably answered within the 1-hour live meeting.
• Specify the specific areas where CBER input is requested.
• Requests must be succinct. Meeting packages must not exceed 50-pages.
• Subject line:
o Specify clearly that the sponsor is requesting an INTERACT meeting.
o Indicate the CBER office where the request should be directed.
▪ e.g., Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development; Office of Vaccine
Research and Review; Office of Compliance and Biologics Quality; etc.
▪ A listing of offices and related contact information may be found here.
• Cover letter:
o Specify clearly that the sponsor is requesting an INTERACT meeting.
o Indicate the CBER office where the request should be directed. A listing of offices and
related contact information may be found here.
• Body of meeting request:
o Describe the product and the disease/condition being treated.
o Summarize the product development to date and any future plans for development.
o Briefly summarize the purpose of the INTERACT meeting.
o Compose a list of questions for CBER grouped by topic.
▪ E.g., chemistry, manufacturing, and controls; pharmacology/toxicology/clinical;
etc.
o Summarize the importance of each question. Provide any relevant context.
o Summarize the relevant data for each question.
o Evaluate whether all appropriate disciplines and participants have been included in the
documentation for submission. If not, pursue as applicable prior to submitting.
o Compose a list of participants, including their titles and affiliations, who will attend the
live meeting (if pursued by sponsor). This includes all consultants and interpreters.
o Specify availability for the meeting. Include specific dates and times (e.g., morning or
afternoon). Include non-availability as applicable. Preferences will be honored in
accordance with CBER availability.
Paul Pasco, BA, BS, PharmD Candidate
12 March 2022
Source: U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings with Sponsors for Drugs and Biological
Products. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; 2020:1-13. Accessed March 11, 2022.
https://www.fda.gov/media/124044/download
Page 4 of 4
o Important terms for reference:
TERM MEANING
CBER Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
CMC Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls
FDA United States Food & Drug Administration
INTERACT
INitial Targeted Engagement for Regulatory
Advice on CBER ProducTs
Meeting package
The collection of documents submitted to the
FDA alongside the request for an INTERACT
meeting.
Pre-IND meeting
Also called a type B meeting or a milestone
meeting. A pre-IND meeting is used for a sponsor
to discuss a candidate product with the FDA to
determine where it stands in the development
process. The required components for an IND
application are reviewed and the FDA staff
provide feedback to the sponsor specific to the
candidate product’s package (portfolio).
SOPP Standard Operating Policy and Procedure
Sponsor
The individual, pharmaceutical company,
governmental agency, academic institution, or
organization seeking approval of a candidate
product.

More Related Content

PDF
Anda refuse to receive
PPTX
QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIONAL GMP INSPECTORATES
PPTX
Presentation on EU Regulatory & Quality System.
PPTX
Computer System Validation
PDF
The Role of Regulatory GMP Audit in Pharmaceutical Companies.
PPTX
New Draft FDA Guidance on Analytical Method Development & Validations.
PPTX
Audit, inspection and monitoring in clinical trial by Ashish singh parihar
Anda refuse to receive
QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR NATIONAL GMP INSPECTORATES
Presentation on EU Regulatory & Quality System.
Computer System Validation
The Role of Regulatory GMP Audit in Pharmaceutical Companies.
New Draft FDA Guidance on Analytical Method Development & Validations.
Audit, inspection and monitoring in clinical trial by Ashish singh parihar

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Quality & compliance excellence in pharmaceuticals
PPTX
European medicines evaluation agency
DOCX
Regulatory affairs manager perfomance appraisal 2
PDF
Financial Disclosure – Duties and Strategies for Clinical Studies
PPTX
Processs validation
PPTX
FDA Guidance on Facing Manufacturing Inspections
PPTX
Second Party Audit and External Third Party Audit
PDF
How to Prepare for an FDA Inspection and Respond to FDA 483's / Warning Letters
PPTX
Quality Audit in pharmaceutical industry
PPTX
FDA Warning letter
PPTX
Concept of regulated and non regulated markets
PPTX
Glp guidelines in_qc_laboratory_as_per_ich
PPTX
Approval process
PDF
eCTD Submissions
PPT
Effective medical device validation introduction manual advance
PDF
21 CFR Part 11: A Concise Overview
PPTX
Application of Q R M in Manufacturing Operations
PDF
Good Manufacturing Practices
PDF
FDA PreApproval Inspection - Part 1
Quality & compliance excellence in pharmaceuticals
European medicines evaluation agency
Regulatory affairs manager perfomance appraisal 2
Financial Disclosure – Duties and Strategies for Clinical Studies
Processs validation
FDA Guidance on Facing Manufacturing Inspections
Second Party Audit and External Third Party Audit
How to Prepare for an FDA Inspection and Respond to FDA 483's / Warning Letters
Quality Audit in pharmaceutical industry
FDA Warning letter
Concept of regulated and non regulated markets
Glp guidelines in_qc_laboratory_as_per_ich
Approval process
eCTD Submissions
Effective medical device validation introduction manual advance
21 CFR Part 11: A Concise Overview
Application of Q R M in Manufacturing Operations
Good Manufacturing Practices
FDA PreApproval Inspection - Part 1
Ad

Similar to Summary of FDA CBER SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings (20)

PDF
Formal Meetings between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants
PPTX
Equivalence approches for complex generics DIA 11 april 2019
PDF
IND_1.6.2 Pre-IND Meeting Background Materials
PPTX
Anda review process
PPTX
FDA liaisions
PPT
Research Governance Lecture
PPTX
Bedside Research
PPTX
Regulation Governing Clinical Trials In India,USA and Europe.
DOCX
SRINIVASAN_AResume(2016) for Linked In
PDF
Timeline Summary to keep the record straight
PPTX
Indusrty and Fda liasions
PDF
Good clinical practices (gcp) 1
PPT
PPT
PPT
Contract research
PDF
WebeX Presentation - Quality Consortium
PPTX
Global Clinical Trials: Best Practices & Common Pitfalls
PPTX
Post marketing surveillance, outsourcing ba and be 1
PPT
Contract research
PDF
PFA Applicant Town Hall Improving Methods for Conducting Patient-Centered Out...
Formal Meetings between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants
Equivalence approches for complex generics DIA 11 april 2019
IND_1.6.2 Pre-IND Meeting Background Materials
Anda review process
FDA liaisions
Research Governance Lecture
Bedside Research
Regulation Governing Clinical Trials In India,USA and Europe.
SRINIVASAN_AResume(2016) for Linked In
Timeline Summary to keep the record straight
Indusrty and Fda liasions
Good clinical practices (gcp) 1
Contract research
WebeX Presentation - Quality Consortium
Global Clinical Trials: Best Practices & Common Pitfalls
Post marketing surveillance, outsourcing ba and be 1
Contract research
PFA Applicant Town Hall Improving Methods for Conducting Patient-Centered Out...
Ad

More from Paul Pasco (17)

PDF
Journal Article Analysis: Medication Errors in Overweight and Obese Pediatric...
PDF
Nursing Education: Appetite Stimulants for Elderly Patients
PDF
Independent Double Checks: A Summary
PDF
Medical Editorial: Digoxin in Heart Failure
PDF
Journal Article Analysis: Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in ACS (PLATO)
PDF
Journal Article Analysis: African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT)
PDF
A Review of Selected Anticoagulants
PDF
Timeline for FDA Approval of Biologics
PDF
The Pharmacology of Cephalosporins: A Practical Guide
PDF
Febrile Neutropenia: A Review
PDF
The Role of Tooth Loss in Impaired Cognition: An Overview of the Literature
PDF
Management of Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury
DOCX
Research Paper on Schizophrenia: Perversion of the Human Mind
PDF
Effects of Fluoroquinolones on Outcomes of Patients with Aortic Dissection or...
PDF
Cardiomyopathy Presentation
DOCX
Research Paper on Perfectionism: The Rebirth of Prohibition
DOCX
Evaluating the Selectivity of Growth Media as a Function of pH – A Comparison...
Journal Article Analysis: Medication Errors in Overweight and Obese Pediatric...
Nursing Education: Appetite Stimulants for Elderly Patients
Independent Double Checks: A Summary
Medical Editorial: Digoxin in Heart Failure
Journal Article Analysis: Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in ACS (PLATO)
Journal Article Analysis: African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT)
A Review of Selected Anticoagulants
Timeline for FDA Approval of Biologics
The Pharmacology of Cephalosporins: A Practical Guide
Febrile Neutropenia: A Review
The Role of Tooth Loss in Impaired Cognition: An Overview of the Literature
Management of Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury
Research Paper on Schizophrenia: Perversion of the Human Mind
Effects of Fluoroquinolones on Outcomes of Patients with Aortic Dissection or...
Cardiomyopathy Presentation
Research Paper on Perfectionism: The Rebirth of Prohibition
Evaluating the Selectivity of Growth Media as a Function of pH – A Comparison...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPT
genitourinary-cancers_1.ppt Nursing care of clients with GU cancer
PDF
CT Anatomy for Radiotherapy.pdf eryuioooop
PPTX
Neuropathic pain.ppt treatment managment
PPTX
Electromyography (EMG) in Physiotherapy: Principles, Procedure & Clinical App...
PDF
Handout_ NURS 220 Topic 10-Abnormal Pregnancy.pdf
PPT
Management of Acute Kidney Injury at LAUTECH
PPT
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
PPTX
Imaging of parasitic D. Case Discussions.pptx
PPT
Copy-Histopathology Practical by CMDA ESUTH CHAPTER(0) - Copy.ppt
PPTX
Chapter-1-The-Human-Body-Orientation-Edited-55-slides.pptx
PPTX
CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDER.POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONx
PDF
NEET PG 2025 | 200 High-Yield Recall Topics Across All Subjects
PPT
ASRH Presentation for students and teachers 2770633.ppt
PPTX
neonatal infection(7392992y282939y5.pptx
PPT
OPIOID ANALGESICS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS
PPT
Obstructive sleep apnea in orthodontics treatment
PPTX
Uterus anatomy embryology, and clinical aspects
PPTX
Pathophysiology And Clinical Features Of Peripheral Nervous System .pptx
PPTX
ACID BASE management, base deficit correction
PPTX
Note on Abortion.pptx for the student note
genitourinary-cancers_1.ppt Nursing care of clients with GU cancer
CT Anatomy for Radiotherapy.pdf eryuioooop
Neuropathic pain.ppt treatment managment
Electromyography (EMG) in Physiotherapy: Principles, Procedure & Clinical App...
Handout_ NURS 220 Topic 10-Abnormal Pregnancy.pdf
Management of Acute Kidney Injury at LAUTECH
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
Imaging of parasitic D. Case Discussions.pptx
Copy-Histopathology Practical by CMDA ESUTH CHAPTER(0) - Copy.ppt
Chapter-1-The-Human-Body-Orientation-Edited-55-slides.pptx
CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDER.POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONx
NEET PG 2025 | 200 High-Yield Recall Topics Across All Subjects
ASRH Presentation for students and teachers 2770633.ppt
neonatal infection(7392992y282939y5.pptx
OPIOID ANALGESICS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS
Obstructive sleep apnea in orthodontics treatment
Uterus anatomy embryology, and clinical aspects
Pathophysiology And Clinical Features Of Peripheral Nervous System .pptx
ACID BASE management, base deficit correction
Note on Abortion.pptx for the student note

Summary of FDA CBER SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings

  • 1. Paul Pasco, BA, BS, PharmD Candidate 12 March 2022 Source: U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings with Sponsors for Drugs and Biological Products. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; 2020:1-13. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://www.fda.gov/media/124044/download Page 1 of 4 Summary of FDA CBER SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings with Sponsors for Drugs and Biological Products FDA CBER SOPP 8214, found here, outlines the INTERACT process used by FDA CBER. Text in yellow is important for the candidate product. Text in green is critical for the candidate product. Major areas of discussion are bolded in red. o Overview of INTERACT: • INTERACT = INitial Targeted Engagement for Regulatory Advice on CBER producTs. • Used to provide preliminary, informal, and non-binding guidance to sponsors on a specific product in early-stage development. o Inquiries for formal meetings (e.g., pre-IND meeting) should be relegated to FDA CBER SOPP 8101.1: Regulatory Meetings with Sponsors and Applicants for Drugs and Biological Products here. • Early-stage development is defined as NOT being sufficiently developed to meet criteria for a pre-IND meeting. • Participation in INTERACT is optional. o NOT a substitute (or a prerequisite) for a pre-IND meeting. A pre-IND meeting will still be required at the appropriate time. o That is, the INTERACT process is NOT required during the FDA approval process for a candidate product to be approved. o Purpose of INTERACT: • Will highlight required elements in early-phase clinical trials (i.e., phase I). • Will identify critical issues or deficiencies for sponsors to address in the development of the candidate product. o Scope of INTERACT: • Intended for novel products with unknown safety profiles. • May include questions about chemistry, manufacturing, and controls; pharmacology/toxicology; and/or other clinical aspects of development. This includes: o Specific questions on the adequacy of selected animal models, study design (e.g., appropriate endpoints). o Acceptability of preclinical testing strategies. o Modifications to preclinical study design. o ***Providing recommendations for further development of an early-stage product for which limited data have been collected outside of a U.S. IND.*** • Exclusion criteria: o Only appropriate if the sponsor has an identified product. o If the sponsor has not begun developing a specific product, or there are multiple products under consideration, INTERACT is not appropriate. o ***If the sponsor has questions about the adequacy and/or design of definitive preclinical toxicology studies, an INTERACT meeting is NOT appropriate. Such questions would be addressed during a pre-IND meeting instead.***
  • 2. Paul Pasco, BA, BS, PharmD Candidate 12 March 2022 Source: U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings with Sponsors for Drugs and Biological Products. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; 2020:1-13. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://www.fda.gov/media/124044/download Page 2 of 4 o Questions about specific aspects of clinical study design, rather than preclinical (e.g., inclusion criteria). Such topics would be reviewed at a pre-IND meeting. o If an INTERACT request is submitted under the above circumstances, the FDA will deny the request to meet. More appropriate alternatives will be suggested. o Unless the product has not begun development or the sponsor is considering multiple products, any other denial of meeting requests will be predicated on a substantive reason. ▪ Missing a minor component of the meeting request or package, described further below, is not a substantive reason. ▪ Significant deficiencies in the request or package, such as no questions identified, lack of a package, or multiple omissions in the one provided, would constitute substantive reasons. ▪ Meeting requests may be denied if a different type of meeting would be more appropriate. This may occur if product development is too advanced at this stage. o General requirements of INTERACT: • The sponsor must read SOPP 8214 in preparation for any INTERACT communications (e.g., meeting request, submission of meeting package, live meeting). • If held, the live meeting may NOT be electronically recorded. • To begin the process of communicating with FDA CBER, requests to establish a secure email connection should be addressed to SecureEmail@fda.hhs.gov. This is not the time to request an INTERACT meeting. This is to establish communication only. o Once a secure email relationship has been established, a formal request for an INTERACT meeting may be submitted. o Questions about this may be relegated to SOPP 8119: Use of Email for Regulatory Communications here. o Timeline of INTERACT: • Goals: o Schedule INTERACT meetings within 21-calendar days of requests. o Hold live meetings within 90-calendar days of requests. • The provided time frames are not obligatory for CBER. Actual timeline may be longer subject to CBER availability. o Structure of INTERACT: 2 main components. • (1) A pre-meeting review of documents. o The collection of these documents is called the “meeting package.” o There are strict requirements for the documents submitted. This includes the types of documents, total volume of documents, focused questions for CBER review, and other elements of the meeting package addressed more fully below. o Once the meeting package is submitted, CBER issues a written response to each question posed. • (2) A live discussion. o The sponsor may be fully satisfied with the written responses. If so, the sponsor may send a written request to CBER to cancel the live meeting. CBER comments will be provided to the sponsor no later than 1-calendar day prior to the live meeting.
  • 3. Paul Pasco, BA, BS, PharmD Candidate 12 March 2022 Source: U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings with Sponsors for Drugs and Biological Products. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; 2020:1-13. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://www.fda.gov/media/124044/download Page 3 of 4 o If not fully satisfied, the sponsor may elect to review the responses with FDA CBER staff in a live meeting. This meeting will provide additional clarification about specific questions submitted previously in writing as part of the meeting package. No new questions may be posed. o Only available via teleconference. Lasts approximately 1-hour. o Requirements for meeting requests, packages, and live meeting: • Address all meeting package materials to INTERACT-CBER@fda.hhs.gov. • With consideration of their complexity, all questions submitted in a single INTERACT meeting request must be capable of being reasonably answered within the 1-hour live meeting. • Specify the specific areas where CBER input is requested. • Requests must be succinct. Meeting packages must not exceed 50-pages. • Subject line: o Specify clearly that the sponsor is requesting an INTERACT meeting. o Indicate the CBER office where the request should be directed. ▪ e.g., Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development; Office of Vaccine Research and Review; Office of Compliance and Biologics Quality; etc. ▪ A listing of offices and related contact information may be found here. • Cover letter: o Specify clearly that the sponsor is requesting an INTERACT meeting. o Indicate the CBER office where the request should be directed. A listing of offices and related contact information may be found here. • Body of meeting request: o Describe the product and the disease/condition being treated. o Summarize the product development to date and any future plans for development. o Briefly summarize the purpose of the INTERACT meeting. o Compose a list of questions for CBER grouped by topic. ▪ E.g., chemistry, manufacturing, and controls; pharmacology/toxicology/clinical; etc. o Summarize the importance of each question. Provide any relevant context. o Summarize the relevant data for each question. o Evaluate whether all appropriate disciplines and participants have been included in the documentation for submission. If not, pursue as applicable prior to submitting. o Compose a list of participants, including their titles and affiliations, who will attend the live meeting (if pursued by sponsor). This includes all consultants and interpreters. o Specify availability for the meeting. Include specific dates and times (e.g., morning or afternoon). Include non-availability as applicable. Preferences will be honored in accordance with CBER availability.
  • 4. Paul Pasco, BA, BS, PharmD Candidate 12 March 2022 Source: U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. SOPP 8214: INTERACT Meetings with Sponsors for Drugs and Biological Products. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; 2020:1-13. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://www.fda.gov/media/124044/download Page 4 of 4 o Important terms for reference: TERM MEANING CBER Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research CMC Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls FDA United States Food & Drug Administration INTERACT INitial Targeted Engagement for Regulatory Advice on CBER ProducTs Meeting package The collection of documents submitted to the FDA alongside the request for an INTERACT meeting. Pre-IND meeting Also called a type B meeting or a milestone meeting. A pre-IND meeting is used for a sponsor to discuss a candidate product with the FDA to determine where it stands in the development process. The required components for an IND application are reviewed and the FDA staff provide feedback to the sponsor specific to the candidate product’s package (portfolio). SOPP Standard Operating Policy and Procedure Sponsor The individual, pharmaceutical company, governmental agency, academic institution, or organization seeking approval of a candidate product.