Summaryof Areas
- 1. Fully hydrated lipid bilayer areas, thicknesses and K C ’s, June 2009 Lipid Temp. Area ± 0.5 Hydrophobic Bending Modulus ( o C) ( Å 2 ) Length, 2D C (Å) K C (x10 -20 J) DPPC 50 62.9( ±1.3) a ,64.0 b ,64.3 c ,63.1 d * 29.2 a ,28.5 b ,27.9 c ,28.4 d * 6.7 (±0.7) e DHPC 48 65.1 e 27.6 e 4.2( ±0.7) e DLPE 35 51.2 b 25.8 b - DMPC 30 59.7 f , 60.6 g 26.2 f ,25.4 g 6.9 g DLPC 30 63.2 g 20.9 g 5.5 g DOPC 30 72.2 h ,72.5 b ,72.1 i , 72.4 j,k ,67.4 d * 27.2 h , 27.1 b , 27.2 i ,26.8 j,k ,28.8 d * 8.0 i,j , 7.6(±0.5) k (15) 69.1 k 27.7 k 8.5( ±0.5) k (45) 75.5 k 26.2 k 7.2( ±0.5) k DOPS 30 65.3 l 30.2 l - FLUID PHASE EggPC 30 69.4 f,b 27.2 f , 27.1 b - POPC 30 68.3(±1.5) j 27.1 j 8.5 j SOPC 30 67.0 (±0.9) m 29.2(±0.4) m 9.0(±1.2) m diC22:1PC 30 69 .3 j 34.4 j 12.7 j 18:0-22:5PC 24 68.7 n 30.5 n 11.0( ±0.2) n ,10.7±0.8** 18:0-22:6PC 24 68.2 n 30.5 n 12.0( ±0.2) n , 7.9±0.5** DMPC 10 47.2 o 30.3( ±0.2) o DiC16PC,18,20,22,24 20 47.5 p,q 34.4 b ,37.1 q ,40.7 q ,44.0 q ,48.0 q DMPS 20 40.8 l 36.0 l DLPE 20 41.0 b 30.0 b GEL PHASE DHPC-Interdig. 20 77.2 e 20.3 e DHPC-gel 20 46.9 e 34.6 e a Biophys.J. 70:1419(1996); b Biochim.Biophys.Acta: Reviews on Biomembranes 1469:159(2000); c Biophys.J.:Biophys.Lett 90:L83(2006); d Biophys.J. 95:2356(2008); e Chem.Phys.Lipids 160:33(2009); f Chem.Phys.Lipids 95:83(1998); g Biophys.J. 88:2626(2005); h Biophys.J. 75:917(1998); i Phys.Rev.E 69:040901(2004); j J.Membr.Biol. 208:193(2005); k Biophys.J. 94:117(2008); l Biophys.J. 86:1574(2004); m Biochim.Biophys.Acta 1178:1120(2008); n J.Am.Chem.Soc. 125:6409(2003); o Biophys.J. 83:3324(2002); p Biophys.J. 64:1097(1993); q Biophys.J. 71:885(1996); *Neutron data; **Upon reanalysis(2009)
Editor's Notes
- #2: The Nagle lab has now determined 12 fluid phase and 8 gel phase lipid bilayer areas using x-ray methods. SOPC is shown here in red since I just submitted this paper – not yet accepted. All of these areas are known to within +/- 0.5 Å 2 , except for POPC which had a slightly larger error due two slightly different results from two different CHESS trips. However, our area for POPC even with this error is much larger than a previously published number near 60 Å 2 . I understand that some of the students read the Nagle and Tristram-Nagle 2000 review article. Only 5 of the fluid phase areas were determined before 2000. Before 2000 we were also using liquid crystal theory, but not with oriented samples, rather isotropic samples which required a high resolution setup and many more samples for each lipid. We did not obtain Kc and B separately, rather as a combined fluctuation parameter. So we get more information from the oriented samples than we did from the samples in the review article.