SlideShare a Scribd company logo
2013 Electrical Regulatory Compliance Forum
Low Voltage Current Transformer Testing for Regulatory Compliance
Razmi Marzook
Electrical Engineer (Metering)
Endeavour Energy, NSW
Abstract
The low voltage current transformers (LV1
CTs) installed in metering
installations are required to be tested for accuracy2
for regulatory
compliance in accordance with the National Electricity Rules (NER).
This has been a challenging project from the planning to implementation
stage, when Australian Energy Regulator (AER) introduced a civil
penalty provision for non-compliance in 2012.
The sample size of 10% was selected from the LV CTs population to be
tested in-situ based on their age incurring a power outage for the
customer’s supply.
The benefits of secondary injection outweighed the conventional primary
injection method to determine the accuracy of the CTs.
Statistical analysis was performed on the obtained field test results.
This paper discusses the management of the performance of LV CT
accuracy testing in-situ and the challenges faced in its process.
Introduction
Low Voltage (LV) Current Transformers (CTs) are installed to step
down the high currents in the primary side to a lower secondary
current to be measured by a transformer connected electricity meter in
metering installations in customer’s switchboards.
The LV CTs of rating up to 3000 Amps primary to 1 or 5 Amps are
used in situations where the anticipated energy consumption exceeds
100 Amps per phase as per Service and Installation Rules of NSW.
The measurement of accuracy of a metering installation is very vital in
the National Electricity Market (NEM) and this does not solely depend
only on the meter alone whereas the minimum accuracy requirement
of National Electricity Rules (Rules/NER) stipulates overall error
inclusive of the CT.
Introduction
The Chapter 7 of NER, Metrology Procedure, Part A and associated
regulations require all new CT’s must meet the requirements of
relevant Australian Standards, it should type tested until a valid
pattern approval is issued by National Measurement Institute (NMI)
and tested for accuracy within the limits of measurement of
uncertainties at least every 10 years (time based) or based on an
asset management strategy approved by Australian Energy Market
Operator (AEMO) for all Type3
1-6 metering installations.
The Responsible Person in the NEM shall be a financially
responsible market participant (retailer) or Local Network Service
Provider (LNSP) and shall be the responsible party who ensure the
regulatory compliance in accordance with the rules when testing the
CTs.
Australian Energy Regulator (AER) is responsible for the
compliance and enforcement with respect to the rules.
Background
Until 2011across the industry, the majority of the CTs installed at
premises were not accuracy tested with in the 10 year interval mainly
due to the challenges faced in the testing task.
AEMO brought this issue to AER’s attention.
Subsequently, in consultation with the industry in the form of a Current
Transformer Testing Working Group (CTTWG), AEMO developed a
document on alternative testing minimum requirements for LV CT
metering installations and AER released a Compliance Bulletin
No.6 on Instrument Transformer Testing.
Introduction
AER published bulletin permitted all RPs to either test a representative
10% sample of LV CTs population from all family types during financial
year 2012-2013 or undertake an alternative testing practice approved
by AEMO.
AEMO’s alternative testing approach is to test LV CTs by sample
testing, variables or attributes method. As part of a sample testing
process, this method requires performing an in service test4
(inspection of sites) at all LV CT metering installations of Type 4-6 and,
in addition test all LV CT meters installed in Type 3 & 4 sites.
The AER bulletin also stated issuing of an infringement notice of
$20,000 or instituting proceedings in a court in relation to a breach of
the electricity rules, in which identify provision of civil penalty an
amount not exceeding $100,000 and an amount not exceeding
$10,000 for every day that the breach continues.
LV CT Testing Process
CTs Specification
The specification of a LV CT includes family characteristics listed
below.
A thorough investigation in terms of these specifications is necessary
to prepare a LV CT test plan as part of the Metering Asset
Management Plan (asset maintainace strategy) to cover field testing
across all family types of the CT population in order to seek
AEMO/AER concurrence.
The availability of historical information and data records helps to build
an effective master plan for the implementation and operation.
CTs Specification
• Australian Standard (AS) of manufacture: AS C.45-1950, AS
388-1968, AS1675-1974, AS60044.1-2007
• Type & Ratio: Type A - 150/300/600:5, Type B - 400/800/1200:5,
Type B - 200/800/1200:5, Type C – 1000/2000/3000:5, Type S -
200:5, Type T – 800:5 and Type W – 1500:5
• Taps on CTs: Multi taps, Single tap (extended range)
• Diameter: 24mm, 32mm, 45mm
• Class: BM, AM, BM/AM/AM (AS C.45), 0.5M, 0.5ME2, 1M
(AS1675), 1.0, 1.0 0.5, 0.5S (AS 60044.1)
• Burden (VA): 5, 10, and 15
• Power Factor of burden: Unity (AS1675), 0.8 (AS 60044.1)
• Winding: Non-Compensated, Compensated
Test Points and Limits of Error
Development of Safe Work Methods
Testing staff are appropriately authorised under the Electrical Safety
Rules to carry out the testing of CTs in-situ.
Prior to commencement of testing, a worksite hazard and risk
assessment shall be carried out so that any hazards and risks
associated with the testing to be assessed and controlled by the safety
control measures to ensure testing can be carried out safely.
All staff is required to wear safety clothing and footwear and rescue
kits shall be available for immediate use. Insulating PPE, i.e. approved
rubber gloves, insulating mat (comply with AS/NZS 2978), approved
eye protection shall also be used as required.
It shall be ensured that CTs do not have open circuit secondaries while
primary circuit is alive and secondary voltage level shall be recorded.
It is very important to check the connections, using non-retractable
fully shrouded lead connectors wherever possible and to connect all
earthing points of test equipment to a suitable common earth.
Primary Injection Method
2.5Comparator 10
Variac Injection Transf.
CT under Test
STD
Burden Box
Test Set
Standard
CT
15 30
Secondary Injection Method
Test Environment
The LV CT customers are located across a large geographical area in the
electricity network and hence the operation of the testing process is
involved with long distance travel for pre inspection of the site and testing
purposes.
The test methodology requires the customer’s load outages and site
access to customer’s main switchboard is necessary for testing the CTs.
This depends on the customer’s support and corporation towards
compliance due to the fact that their normal processes are to be disrupted.
The pre inspection of the site prior to organising the testing with the
customer’s help to assess the site condition and the feasibility to carry out
the tests such as sufficient natural light, adequate space, the design of the
switchboard and the construction of the CTs installed.
Due to the fact that, some of the switchboards were built in two to four
decades ago, the challenges facing in reality in the LV CT testing process
is to overcome these factors.
Test Management
The management of tests, project support and to review the progress in
order to achieve the targets is a real challenge.
There are lots of activities in the back office and also in the field that are
needed to be performed such as contacting customers, requesting for load
shut down and scheduling and organising a suitable time and date to
carryout tests.
It has been very effective to meet the customer directly by the test staff to
discuss the requirement of the test and to organise an appointment for the
outage.
The majority of the customers have been very corporative and in certain
instances, the customer’s request written undertaking of the requirement.
The selections of premises to be tested are performed by a database
based on the CT’s age and service orders are created automatically with
the help a computer system.
The scheduling and asset management tools for records management are
very helpful to operate the testing process efficiently and effectively.
Test Results
The accuracy test results of the LV CTs, ratio error and the phase
angle error were found to be within the limits of error specified by the
AEMO for in service compliance testing of CTs irrespective of their
manufacture standards and the accuracy class.
When the LV CT’s accuracies are available, the calculation of the
overall accuracy requirement for the metering installations could be
performed with the help of a computer based system.
The test results are submitted to AEMO for further analysis and AER
will assess whether a further 10%, or another sample size of LV CTs,
should be tested by RPs who have adopted this approach.
Discussion
Metrology in the NEM itself is very challenging in view of national and
jurisdictional regulation in addition to the ongoing competition in the
metering business.
The implementation of National Energy Customer Framework (NECF) in
NSW in July 2013 introduces some non-negotiable regulations in the areas
of customer’s interruptions.
The electricity network businesses are endeavoring to keep the electricity
price increases to in par with the CPI while meeting the regulatory
compliance which contributes to cost implications due to investment in the
resources.
When AER finailise the next course of action towards the continuation of LV
CT testing based on the assessment of the test results of the current
program, there would be many challenges ahead in the future.
Acknowledgement
The author appreciates the fullest support of the management, field
and back office staff at Metering Information branch at Endeavour
Energy to complete the interim solution to LV CT testing.
Thank You

More Related Content

PDF
Reliability Engineering Services Overview
DOC
Jamal_Ashraf -1 oil@gas
PPT
Intertek Presentation
PDF
1330 anderson
DOCX
Hari Maintenance
DOCX
Rev02 Resume of James Macauley Nov'16 (3)
PPT
Metering Solutions
PDF
Knee point & primary current injection test 1
Reliability Engineering Services Overview
Jamal_Ashraf -1 oil@gas
Intertek Presentation
1330 anderson
Hari Maintenance
Rev02 Resume of James Macauley Nov'16 (3)
Metering Solutions
Knee point & primary current injection test 1

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
ELECTRICAL SCHMATICS AT NCP_FINAL
PDF
Portfolio Mahmoud Saeed 2015
PDF
Jarkom khrisna
DOCX
Curriculum vitae lili
PPTX
Biologia-Animais geneticamente modificados
DOCX
Sumon Mohan Maitra-CV
PPTX
Simple 3d engine
DOCX
Sumon Mohan Maitra_CV
PDF
ANALYSIS OF GRAIN YIELD AND AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS IN DROUGHT-TOLERANT MAI...
DOCX
Prasad resume
PDF
Evaluation of Different Formulations of Weak Acid Solution as Preservative Me...
PPTX
Ayurveda Treatment in Kochi
PPT
Structural Foam Molding Process
PPTX
Bruxas
PPTX
Analyzing the Test
PDF
Mutagenic Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on Growth and Agronomic Characters...
PDF
abedalrhman Alkurdi C.V
PDF
Genotypic pathogenic microbes associated with deterioration of sweet orange (...
PPT
Iraq at the Crossroads
PDF
GENETIC VARIATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND YIELD CHARACTERS OF Celosia argentea L...
ELECTRICAL SCHMATICS AT NCP_FINAL
Portfolio Mahmoud Saeed 2015
Jarkom khrisna
Curriculum vitae lili
Biologia-Animais geneticamente modificados
Sumon Mohan Maitra-CV
Simple 3d engine
Sumon Mohan Maitra_CV
ANALYSIS OF GRAIN YIELD AND AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS IN DROUGHT-TOLERANT MAI...
Prasad resume
Evaluation of Different Formulations of Weak Acid Solution as Preservative Me...
Ayurveda Treatment in Kochi
Structural Foam Molding Process
Bruxas
Analyzing the Test
Mutagenic Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on Growth and Agronomic Characters...
abedalrhman Alkurdi C.V
Genotypic pathogenic microbes associated with deterioration of sweet orange (...
Iraq at the Crossroads
GENETIC VARIATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND YIELD CHARACTERS OF Celosia argentea L...
Ad

Similar to Technical Paper Presentation- ERC Forum (19)

DOCX
Kaizenreport
PPT
Instrument Transformers - Following the Money: Best Practices in a Post AMI W...
PPT
Site Verification: Tools and Best Practices to Accurately Meter Complex, High...
PPTX
Sona Electric Power Engineering and Testing Centre
PPTX
Fundamentals of Transformer-Rated Field Meter Testing and Site Verification
PDF
Simulating Real World Metering Conditions
PPT
Site Verification - Protocols & Tools for Complex Metering Installations
PPT
Site Verification - Protocols & Tools for Complex Metering Installations
PPT
Instrument Transformer Testing in the Shop and Field
PPT
AMI Site Verification - Protocols & Tools for Complex Metering Installations
PPT
TESCO Site Verification in a Pre and Post AMI World
PDF
Electrical Distribution System
PDF
Magnetic Cable CE-EMC Test Report - Shenzhen YouCable Technology Co., Ltd
PPT
Instrument Transformer Testing in them Shop and Field_Tom Lawton 2023
PDF
Methods to determine the overall health and condition of large power transfor...
PDF
11.methods to determine the overall health and condition of large power trans...
PPT
Instrument Transformer Testing
PDF
REPORT -VALLUR THERMAL POWER PLANT
Kaizenreport
Instrument Transformers - Following the Money: Best Practices in a Post AMI W...
Site Verification: Tools and Best Practices to Accurately Meter Complex, High...
Sona Electric Power Engineering and Testing Centre
Fundamentals of Transformer-Rated Field Meter Testing and Site Verification
Simulating Real World Metering Conditions
Site Verification - Protocols & Tools for Complex Metering Installations
Site Verification - Protocols & Tools for Complex Metering Installations
Instrument Transformer Testing in the Shop and Field
AMI Site Verification - Protocols & Tools for Complex Metering Installations
TESCO Site Verification in a Pre and Post AMI World
Electrical Distribution System
Magnetic Cable CE-EMC Test Report - Shenzhen YouCable Technology Co., Ltd
Instrument Transformer Testing in them Shop and Field_Tom Lawton 2023
Methods to determine the overall health and condition of large power transfor...
11.methods to determine the overall health and condition of large power trans...
Instrument Transformer Testing
REPORT -VALLUR THERMAL POWER PLANT
Ad

Technical Paper Presentation- ERC Forum

  • 1. 2013 Electrical Regulatory Compliance Forum Low Voltage Current Transformer Testing for Regulatory Compliance Razmi Marzook Electrical Engineer (Metering) Endeavour Energy, NSW
  • 2. Abstract The low voltage current transformers (LV1 CTs) installed in metering installations are required to be tested for accuracy2 for regulatory compliance in accordance with the National Electricity Rules (NER). This has been a challenging project from the planning to implementation stage, when Australian Energy Regulator (AER) introduced a civil penalty provision for non-compliance in 2012. The sample size of 10% was selected from the LV CTs population to be tested in-situ based on their age incurring a power outage for the customer’s supply. The benefits of secondary injection outweighed the conventional primary injection method to determine the accuracy of the CTs. Statistical analysis was performed on the obtained field test results. This paper discusses the management of the performance of LV CT accuracy testing in-situ and the challenges faced in its process.
  • 3. Introduction Low Voltage (LV) Current Transformers (CTs) are installed to step down the high currents in the primary side to a lower secondary current to be measured by a transformer connected electricity meter in metering installations in customer’s switchboards. The LV CTs of rating up to 3000 Amps primary to 1 or 5 Amps are used in situations where the anticipated energy consumption exceeds 100 Amps per phase as per Service and Installation Rules of NSW. The measurement of accuracy of a metering installation is very vital in the National Electricity Market (NEM) and this does not solely depend only on the meter alone whereas the minimum accuracy requirement of National Electricity Rules (Rules/NER) stipulates overall error inclusive of the CT.
  • 4. Introduction The Chapter 7 of NER, Metrology Procedure, Part A and associated regulations require all new CT’s must meet the requirements of relevant Australian Standards, it should type tested until a valid pattern approval is issued by National Measurement Institute (NMI) and tested for accuracy within the limits of measurement of uncertainties at least every 10 years (time based) or based on an asset management strategy approved by Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) for all Type3 1-6 metering installations. The Responsible Person in the NEM shall be a financially responsible market participant (retailer) or Local Network Service Provider (LNSP) and shall be the responsible party who ensure the regulatory compliance in accordance with the rules when testing the CTs. Australian Energy Regulator (AER) is responsible for the compliance and enforcement with respect to the rules.
  • 5. Background Until 2011across the industry, the majority of the CTs installed at premises were not accuracy tested with in the 10 year interval mainly due to the challenges faced in the testing task. AEMO brought this issue to AER’s attention. Subsequently, in consultation with the industry in the form of a Current Transformer Testing Working Group (CTTWG), AEMO developed a document on alternative testing minimum requirements for LV CT metering installations and AER released a Compliance Bulletin No.6 on Instrument Transformer Testing.
  • 6. Introduction AER published bulletin permitted all RPs to either test a representative 10% sample of LV CTs population from all family types during financial year 2012-2013 or undertake an alternative testing practice approved by AEMO. AEMO’s alternative testing approach is to test LV CTs by sample testing, variables or attributes method. As part of a sample testing process, this method requires performing an in service test4 (inspection of sites) at all LV CT metering installations of Type 4-6 and, in addition test all LV CT meters installed in Type 3 & 4 sites. The AER bulletin also stated issuing of an infringement notice of $20,000 or instituting proceedings in a court in relation to a breach of the electricity rules, in which identify provision of civil penalty an amount not exceeding $100,000 and an amount not exceeding $10,000 for every day that the breach continues.
  • 7. LV CT Testing Process
  • 8. CTs Specification The specification of a LV CT includes family characteristics listed below. A thorough investigation in terms of these specifications is necessary to prepare a LV CT test plan as part of the Metering Asset Management Plan (asset maintainace strategy) to cover field testing across all family types of the CT population in order to seek AEMO/AER concurrence. The availability of historical information and data records helps to build an effective master plan for the implementation and operation.
  • 9. CTs Specification • Australian Standard (AS) of manufacture: AS C.45-1950, AS 388-1968, AS1675-1974, AS60044.1-2007 • Type & Ratio: Type A - 150/300/600:5, Type B - 400/800/1200:5, Type B - 200/800/1200:5, Type C – 1000/2000/3000:5, Type S - 200:5, Type T – 800:5 and Type W – 1500:5 • Taps on CTs: Multi taps, Single tap (extended range) • Diameter: 24mm, 32mm, 45mm • Class: BM, AM, BM/AM/AM (AS C.45), 0.5M, 0.5ME2, 1M (AS1675), 1.0, 1.0 0.5, 0.5S (AS 60044.1) • Burden (VA): 5, 10, and 15 • Power Factor of burden: Unity (AS1675), 0.8 (AS 60044.1) • Winding: Non-Compensated, Compensated
  • 10. Test Points and Limits of Error
  • 11. Development of Safe Work Methods Testing staff are appropriately authorised under the Electrical Safety Rules to carry out the testing of CTs in-situ. Prior to commencement of testing, a worksite hazard and risk assessment shall be carried out so that any hazards and risks associated with the testing to be assessed and controlled by the safety control measures to ensure testing can be carried out safely. All staff is required to wear safety clothing and footwear and rescue kits shall be available for immediate use. Insulating PPE, i.e. approved rubber gloves, insulating mat (comply with AS/NZS 2978), approved eye protection shall also be used as required. It shall be ensured that CTs do not have open circuit secondaries while primary circuit is alive and secondary voltage level shall be recorded. It is very important to check the connections, using non-retractable fully shrouded lead connectors wherever possible and to connect all earthing points of test equipment to a suitable common earth.
  • 12. Primary Injection Method 2.5Comparator 10 Variac Injection Transf. CT under Test STD Burden Box Test Set Standard CT 15 30
  • 14. Test Environment The LV CT customers are located across a large geographical area in the electricity network and hence the operation of the testing process is involved with long distance travel for pre inspection of the site and testing purposes. The test methodology requires the customer’s load outages and site access to customer’s main switchboard is necessary for testing the CTs. This depends on the customer’s support and corporation towards compliance due to the fact that their normal processes are to be disrupted. The pre inspection of the site prior to organising the testing with the customer’s help to assess the site condition and the feasibility to carry out the tests such as sufficient natural light, adequate space, the design of the switchboard and the construction of the CTs installed. Due to the fact that, some of the switchboards were built in two to four decades ago, the challenges facing in reality in the LV CT testing process is to overcome these factors.
  • 15. Test Management The management of tests, project support and to review the progress in order to achieve the targets is a real challenge. There are lots of activities in the back office and also in the field that are needed to be performed such as contacting customers, requesting for load shut down and scheduling and organising a suitable time and date to carryout tests. It has been very effective to meet the customer directly by the test staff to discuss the requirement of the test and to organise an appointment for the outage. The majority of the customers have been very corporative and in certain instances, the customer’s request written undertaking of the requirement. The selections of premises to be tested are performed by a database based on the CT’s age and service orders are created automatically with the help a computer system. The scheduling and asset management tools for records management are very helpful to operate the testing process efficiently and effectively.
  • 16. Test Results The accuracy test results of the LV CTs, ratio error and the phase angle error were found to be within the limits of error specified by the AEMO for in service compliance testing of CTs irrespective of their manufacture standards and the accuracy class. When the LV CT’s accuracies are available, the calculation of the overall accuracy requirement for the metering installations could be performed with the help of a computer based system. The test results are submitted to AEMO for further analysis and AER will assess whether a further 10%, or another sample size of LV CTs, should be tested by RPs who have adopted this approach.
  • 17. Discussion Metrology in the NEM itself is very challenging in view of national and jurisdictional regulation in addition to the ongoing competition in the metering business. The implementation of National Energy Customer Framework (NECF) in NSW in July 2013 introduces some non-negotiable regulations in the areas of customer’s interruptions. The electricity network businesses are endeavoring to keep the electricity price increases to in par with the CPI while meeting the regulatory compliance which contributes to cost implications due to investment in the resources. When AER finailise the next course of action towards the continuation of LV CT testing based on the assessment of the test results of the current program, there would be many challenges ahead in the future.
  • 18. Acknowledgement The author appreciates the fullest support of the management, field and back office staff at Metering Information branch at Endeavour Energy to complete the interim solution to LV CT testing.