TERS Presentation
- 1. Presentation at GMA-9 Meeting - November 18, 2013 TWDB Report : GAM Task 13-032 , Dr. Ian Jones and Robert Bradley Total Estimated Recoverable Storage - TERS for Aquifers in GMA 9 • Texas Water Code (2011): “before voting on their proposed DFC for a relevant aquifer within a groundwater management area, the groundwater conservation districts shall consider the total estimated recoverable storage as provided by the executive administrator of the TWDB” • TERS Calculation: Total Storage; Total Estimated Recoverable Storage A.S. Broun, PG, HTGCD December 2013
- 2. Definitions • Total Storage: the volume of groundwater that can be released by completely draining the aquifer. Data required for calculation: area, water level - aquifer bottom (saturated thickness), and aquifer storage properties (specific yield for unconfined aquifers) • HTGCD Trinity Aquifer: total district area; average water level from historical TWDB data base; Paleozoic as aquifer bottom; storage properties from TWDB 2011 GAM (Hutchison) assumes Trinity Aquifer unconfined
- 3. Area: HTGCD Boundary Water level Paleozoic : aquifer bottom, confining unit Trinity AquiferSaturated intervalarea x specific yield x saturated interval = total storage = drained volume Specific yield values: 0.01 to 0.3 (limestone .14 avg.) Total Storage
- 4. Definitions • Total Estimated Recoverable Storage – TERS: “the estimated amount of groundwater within an aquifer that accounts for recovery scenarios that range between 25 and 75% of the porosity-adjusted aquifer volume; assume that between 25 and 75% of groundwater held within an aquifer can be removed by pumping” (Texas Administrative Code, 2011)
- 5. Area: HTGCD Boundary Water level Paleozoic : aquifer bottom, confining unit Trinity Aquifer Total Estimated Recoverable Storage 25% 75% unsaturated interval
- 6. Hill Country Trinity Aquifer – HTGCD • Total storage calculated at: 550,000 acre feet • Total Estimated Recoverable Storage: 25% of total storage: 137,500 acre feet 75% of total storage: 412,000 acre feet DFC : 30’ average regional drawdown -50 years (less than 20’ in HTGCD) : 9,100 acre feet/year
- 7. Concerns • The TERS values for the Trinity Aquifer in HTGCD, as stated in the TWDB Report, are best used for regional studies. Volumetric analyses without local control are controversial. • The averaged values used for saturated thicknesses and specific yield are not representative of the rapid lithofacies changes in the Trinity section. • No consideration is given to producibility. How long would it take to produce (drain) the TERS? Close spacing required to recover that volume of water in low flow-rates normally seen in Hays County would not be practical. • Method does not distinguish water quality or changes to surface water - groundwater interaction caused by pumping.
- 8. More Concerns • Hickory Aquifer (Paleozoic): Unit is projected south of Blanco County into northwest corner of Hays County subsurface. Total storage of 58,000 acre feet assigned to District. • San Antonio segment of the Edwards (BFZ) Aquifer: minor fraction of aquifer within HTGCD along irregular eastern boundary. 4,500 acre feet of total storage assigned to District. • No action required by HTGCD.
- 9. CONCLUSIONS • HTGCD to consider Trinity Aquifer TERS values for next DFC calculation. • Until reliable model available for Trinity using local data base, use TERS with caution. • “The volume of water contained in …. an aquifer is of interest, of more concern is how much water can be released from storage” Driscoll, 1986