Test Bank for Physics for Scientists and Engineers 4th by Knight
Test Bank for Physics for Scientists and Engineers 4th by Knight
Test Bank for Physics for Scientists and Engineers 4th by Knight
Test Bank for Physics for Scientists and Engineers 4th by Knight
1. Visit https://testbankmall.com to download the full version and
explore more testbank or solutions manual
Test Bank for Physics for Scientists and Engineers
4th by Knight
_____ Click the link below to download _____
https://testbankmall.com/product/test-bank-for-physics-for-
scientists-and-engineers-4th-by-knight/
Explore and download more testbank or solutions manual at testbankmall.com
2. Here are some recommended products that we believe you will be
interested in. You can click the link to download.
Physics for Scientists and Engineers Knight 3rd Edition
Test Bank
https://testbankmall.com/product/physics-for-scientists-and-engineers-
knight-3rd-edition-test-bank/
Physics for Scientists and Engineers Knight 3rd Edition
Solutions Manual
https://testbankmall.com/product/physics-for-scientists-and-engineers-
knight-3rd-edition-solutions-manual/
Physics for Scientists and Engineers A Strategic Approach
with Modern Physics 4th Edition Knight Solutions Manual
https://testbankmall.com/product/physics-for-scientists-and-engineers-
a-strategic-approach-with-modern-physics-4th-edition-knight-solutions-
manual/
Solution Manual for Physics for Scientists and Engineers,
4th Edition, Randall D. Knight, ISBN-10: 0133942651,
ISBN-13: 9780133942651
https://testbankmall.com/product/solution-manual-for-physics-for-
scientists-and-engineers-4th-edition-randall-d-knight-
isbn-10-0133942651-isbn-13-9780133942651/
3. Solution Manual for Modern Physics for Scientists and
Engineers, 4th Edition
https://testbankmall.com/product/solution-manual-for-modern-physics-
for-scientists-and-engineers-4th-edition/
Test Bank for Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 4th
Edition: Douglas C. Giancoli
https://testbankmall.com/product/test-bank-for-physics-for-scientists-
and-engineers-4th-edition-douglas-c-giancoli/
Solution Manual for Physics for Scientists and Engineers
9th by Serway
https://testbankmall.com/product/solution-manual-for-physics-for-
scientists-and-engineers-9th-by-serway/
Physics For Scientists And Engineers 3rd Edition Fishbane
Solutions Manual
https://testbankmall.com/product/physics-for-scientists-and-
engineers-3rd-edition-fishbane-solutions-manual/
Solutions Manual to accompany Physics for Scientists and
Engineers with Modern Physics: A Strategic Approach
9780805386851
https://testbankmall.com/product/solutions-manual-to-accompany-
physics-for-scientists-and-engineers-with-modern-physics-a-strategic-
approach-9780805386851/
34. HAMPTON COURT.
The Mercers’ Hall in Cheapside; the Grocers’, a portion of which was
long used by the Bank of England; the Haberdashers’, where the rich
ceiling was its great ornament; the Tallow Chandlers’, with its interior
colonnade and its fountain; the Apothecaries’, one of the largest in
the City; the Stationers’; and, last but not least, the Alderman’s
Court adjoining Guildhall, rebuilt almost immediately after the fire; a
very handsome room, rich in carving, and finely proportioned.
S. Edmund the King, in Lombard Street, was finished this year. The
necessities of the site caused Wren to build it north and south, the
altar being at the north end. The front to Lombard Street, the only
part of the outside visible, is of stone and very picturesque with its
belfry and little domed spire. The interior has been lately re-
arranged with a wise treatment of the old work and carving. The
‘marble font possesses, like that of S. Mary Abchurch, a very
beautiful canopied cover; it is in two stages, the lower being domed,
and above are four seated figures of the Cardinal Virtues; it is railed
in and is on the west side of the church.’[206]
S. Margaret’s, Lothbury, belongs to the same date, and was rebuilt
of stone. Some years later Wren bestowed much rich wood carving
on the interior. He chose the Corinthian style for this building and
handled it with considerable skill.
Queen Mary, who had the Stuart love for
genius, was invariably gracious and even
friendly to Wren, with whom she held many a
conversation on matters of art and science. He considered her to be
very well versed in all these subjects and enjoyed discussing them
freely with her. Queen Mary was much charmed with the situation of
Cardinal Wolsey’s old palace of Hampton Court, and engaged Wren
to make alterations there. The old buildings were accordingly in part
pulled down and two sets of royal apartments built; Queen Mary,
though she amused herself with planning the gardens and making
suggestions, had yet the wisdom to defer to Wren’s better taste and
knowledge. Her husband, with characteristic obstinacy, insisted on
his own ideas, thereby dwarfing the cloisters and marring much of
35. GREENWICH AS A
HOSPITAL.
the architecture. It is, however, fair to say that King William always
owned that the defects[207] were his, the merits, Wren’s; and these
merits are very great, as anyone who knows the fine old palace with
its rich red brick, its arcades, and the quaint formal gardens will
readily allow. He built, at about the same time, the Pavilion and
Ranger’s House in Bushey Park.
Kensington Palace was also under Wren’s hands. It had been the
property of Lord Chancellor Finch, and was sold by his son to William
III. Wren added another story to the old house, which forms the
north front of the palace, and also built the south front. The defect
of the building as seen at the end of the long avenue of Kensington
Gardens is its want of height, but on a nearer approach this fault is
much diminished. King William was in the midst of his Irish
campaign while the work went on, but found time to send back
repeated inquiries as to its progress, and complaints when that did
not answer his expectations. There, five years later, Queen Mary
died, to the regret of all her subjects, and even of her cold-hearted
husband.
Nor were these the only palaces which Wren
contrived for Queen Mary. That of Greenwich
had been begun by Inigo Jones for Henrietta
Maria, and a wing had been built for Charles
II., but it had been left unfinished. Wren, who knew Greenwich well
from his visits to the Observatory, and who took a great interest in
sailors, observing the entire lack of any refuge for them in illness,
proposed to Queen Mary the magnificent plan of making the palace
into a seaman’s hospital. The Queen willingly entered into the idea,
and proposed to add to the Queen’s House, as it was called, so as to
make it a dwelling for herself, at the same time. Evelyn, Sir Stephen
Fox and others, came readily into the scheme and contributed
liberally. Wren’s contribution, though not in money, was a liberal one
also; for he gave his time, labour, skill and superintendence, despite
his innumerable other works.
36. The plans were prepared and money collected, but nothing was
actually done until some years later.
Wren’s eldest son had in the meantime finished his Eton and
Cambridge career and had obtained, by his father’s interest, the
post, which must surely have been a sinecure! of Assistant Deputy
Engrosser. He does not seem to have inherited any of the brilliant
genius of his father, though apparently of very fair abilities and with
much taste for antiquities. Far more like Sir Christopher was his
daughter Jane, who shared his tastes and studies and took a vivid
interest in his work. She added to her other accomplishments that of
being a very skilful musician. She was never married, but remained
all her life her father’s affectionate companion.
Wren’s old friend, Dr. Bathurst of Trinity College, Oxford, appealed to
him, in the spring of 1692, for help in the buildings which were still
going on there.
37. HE SENDS HIS
THOUGHTS.
‘Worthy Sir,—When I sent Mr. Phips (the surveyor of the
buildings) to wait on you with a scheme of our new building, he
told me how kindly you was pleased to express your
remembrance of me, and that you would send me your
thoughts concerning our design; and particularly of the
pinnacles, the which as they were superadded to our first
draught, so I must confess I would be well content to have
omitted with your approbation. The season for our falling to
work again will now speedily come on; which makes me the
more hasten to entreat from you the trouble of two or three
lines in relation to the promises whereby you will farther oblige,
‘Sir, your old friend, and ever faithful servant,
‘R. Bathurst.’
Wren’s answer comes promptly, and shows his generous readiness
to help the schemes of others, no matter how pressing his own work
was.
‘Sir,—I am extremely glad to hear of your
good health, and, what is more, that you
are vigorous and active, and employed in
building. I considered the design you sent
me of your Chapel which in the main is very well, and I believe
your work is too far advanced to admit of any advice: however,
I have sent my thoughts, which will be of use to the mason to
form his mouldings.
‘He will find two sorts of cornice; he may use either. I did not
well comprehend how the tower would have good bearing upon
that side where the stairs rise. I have ventured a change of the
stairs, to leave the wall next the porch of sufficient scantling to
bear that part which rises above the roofs adjoining.
‘There is no necessity for pinnacles, and those expressed in the
printed design are much too slender.
38. ‘I have given another way to the rail and baluster, which will
admit of a vase that will stand properly upon the pilaster.[208]
‘Sir, I wish you success and health and long life, with all the
affection that is due from,
‘Your obliged, faithful friend, and humble servant,
‘Christopher Wren.
‘P.S. A little deal box, with a drawing in it, is sent by Thomas
Moore, Oxford carrier.’
In the same year the Church of S. Andrew by the Wardrobe[209] was
finished; recent alterations in the city have benefited this building; it
now stands well above a flight of steps, with its square tower, and
the red brick which contrives to be red and not black, and stone
dressings.
Two years later Wren rebuilt All Hallows, Lombard Street, on an
ancient foundation: outside it is one of his plainest and most solid
churches, inside he spent upon it much rich work and curious
carving both in stone and wood.
S. Michael Royal, College Hill, belongs to this same date, and was
built under Wren’s directions by Edward Strong, his master-mason. It
is a well-lit, handsome church with a tower at one corner, and
contains an altar-piece of singular beauty, carved by Grinling
Gibbons in ‘right wainscot oak.’ The old church was founded and
made a collegiate church of S. Spiritus and S. Mary by no less a
person than Sir Richard Whittington, three times Lord Mayor of
London (1397, 1406, 1419), whose fame, with that of his cat,
survives in the well-known story. He founded also another college,
known as the Whittington College, and endowed it with a divinity
lecture ‘for ever.’ Edward VI., however, suppressed both the colleges
and the lecture, though the Whittington College was allowed
partially to survive as almshouses for poor men. Whittington[210]
was buried in this church, but his monument perished in the Fire.
39. CLIPT WINGS.
A GRAND DESIGN.
In the following year Wren added a well-proportioned, peculiar
steeple, the gift of the parishioners, to the little stone Church of S.
Vedast[211] in Foster Lane, a church to which a painful interest now
attaches from the recent persecution and imprisonment of its rector,
the Rev. T. P. Dale.
The church was decorated, as was Wren’s custom, with fret-work,
carving, and stucco, but is not otherwise remarkable.
S. Mary’s, Somerset, or Somers’hithe, was likewise finished in this
year: a stone church with two aisles surmounted by a handsome
cornice and balustrade; its great feature was the beautiful pinnacled
tower, which, though the church is gone, still stands a perpetual
memorial of that reckless disregard of God’s honour, which has
counted any common want, any farthing of money, of more
importance than the claims of His service, or than gifts solemnly
offered to Him.[212]
The Cathedral meanwhile grew slowly, though
many a hindrance annoyed its architect. The
Parliament took part of the fabric money and
applied it to the expenses of King William’s
wars, so that, as Sir Christopher complained,
his wings were clipt and the Church was deprived of its ornaments.
[213] The organ was another annoyance. Sir Christopher’s wish and
intention was to place the organ where it now is, on either side of
the choir, in order to leave the vista clear from the west door to the
altar, which in his design stood grandly raised under a handsome
canopy. This was overruled, and the organ was to be placed in a
gallery cutting right across the entrance of the choir. With his
wonted philosophy, Wren bent his mind to reducing as much as
possible the injury to the architectural effect, by keeping the pipes
as low as he could. But in the builder of the organ, Bernard Smith,
or ‘Father’ Smith, as he is called, Wren had a difficult person to deal
with. Far from lowering the pipes, Smith made them higher than in
his estimate, so that the case and ornaments had to be enlarged,
and Sir Christopher complained bitterly that the Cathedral ‘was spoilt
40. by that box of whistles.’ The rival organ builder, Renatus Harris, if
indeed he was the author of an anonymous paper, called ‘Queries
about the S. Paul’s Organ,[214] was not sparing in his criticisms. One
query asks
‘Whether Sir C. Wren wou’d not have been well pleas’d to have
receiv’d such a proposal from the organ builder of S. Paul’s, as
shou’d have erected an organ, so as to have separated twenty
foot in the middle, as low as the gallery, and thereby a full and
airy prospect of the whole length of the church, and six fronts
with towers as high as requisite?’
This question is easy enough to answer, and fortunately Wren’s
wishes have been at last fulfilled by that division of the organ, which
now leaves the desired clear view from the great western doors to
the altar. Harris, in 1712, proposed to erect a great organ over the
west doors of the Cathedral,
‘study’d to be in all respects made the most artful, costly and
magnificent piece of organ-work that ever has hitherto been
invented. The use of it will be for the reception of the Queen,
on all publick occasions of thanksgivings for the good effect of
peace or war, upon all state days, S. Cecilia’s Day, the
entertainment of foreigners of quality, and artists, and on all
times of greatest concourse etc., and by the advice and
assistance of Sir C. Wren, the external figure and ornaments
may be contrived so proportionable to the order of the building,
as to be a decoration to that part of the edifice and no
obstruction to any of the rest.... Sir Christopher Wren approves
it.’
Alas! at that time Wren’s approval was enough to determine the
majority of the commission to reject any plan thus sanctioned, and
Renatus Harris’s grand design survives on paper alone.
41. CHAPTER XII.
1697–1699.
OPENING OF S. PAUL’S CHOIR—A MOVEABLE PULPIT—LETTER TO
HIS SON AT PARIS—ORDER AGAINST SWEARING—PETER THE
GREAT—S. DUNSTAN’S SPIRE—MORNING PRAYER CHAPEL
OPENED—WESTMINSTER ABBEY.
Home-keeping youth have ever homely wit.
Two Gentlemen of Verona.
One serious trouble and hindrance in all public works was the state
of the coinage. The money had been so clipped and defaced, that no
coin was worth its professed value, and for some time the
expedients used by the Government failed to lighten the pressure. In
paying such an army of workmen as those employed about S. Paul’s,
the inconvenience must have amounted to positive distress.
Scattered here and there through Evelyn’s diary are many references
to the ‘great confusion and distraction’ it occasioned.
A sudden subsidence of a large part of the ground at Portland, close
to the quarries set apart for Wren’s use, caused an inconvenient
delay in bringing the stone to London, but yet the work progressed,
and on December 2nd, 1697, the choir was opened for service.
It was the occasion of the thanksgiving for the peace of Ryswick,
which, though it brought little glory to England, was yet heartily
welcomed as the close of a long and exhausting war.
King William went to Whitehall, and heard Bishop Burnet’s flattering
sermon, while Bishop Compton preached for the first time in the new
S. Paul’s. No report of his sermon has come down to us. The choir
was not yet enriched with the carvings of Gibbons; but the pulpit
42. appears to have been very remarkable in its way: Sir Christopher
had placed it on wheels, perhaps with a design of using it
afterwards, for services under the dome, not unlike those we are
now familiar with.
A pulpit on wheels was a novelty, which gave rise, we can well
believe, to many squibs, one of which has been preserved.
A faithful copy of the Verses, lately fastened upon the pulpit of S.
Paul’s Choir.
TO THE ARCHITECT UPON HIS HAPPY INVENTION OF A PULPIT ON
WHEELS FOR THE USE OF S. PAUL’S CHOIR.
This little Structure (Excellent Sir Kit)
Holds forth to us that You bestowed more Wit
In Building it than on all Paul’s beside;
This shows the Principles, that but the Pride
Of its Inhabitants; True Sons of Saul,
For he (Good Man) became All things to All,
That by all Sorts of Means he might gain some.
They too for Gain would follow him to Rome,
This Passively Obedient thing will go as
They’d have it, or to Mecca, Rome, or Troas;
All one to it, if forward Hawl’d or back,
’Twill run a Holy Stage for Will or Jack;
And truckle to and fro’ ’twixt Cause and Cause,
Just as Strongest Pull of Interest draws.
But if the Pulpit be a Vital Part
O’ th’ Church, or as the Doctors say her Heart,
Why don’t you fix that also on a Rock
And let the Steeple Roost the Weather-Cock?
Where if a Puff of Strong Temptations blow,
It might remind the Staggering Saints and Crow.
Improve the Thought, Dear Sir, and let St. Paul’s
Wise Fane be this new Going Cart for Souls.[215]
43. A FOREIGN TOUR.
‘I WILL NOT
DISCONTENT YOU.’
It hardly needs the hint that these lines were affixed to ‘the Dean’s
side of the pulpit,’ to read in them a bitter satire on Dean Sherlock,
whose sudden change of front relative to the non-jurors, and
acceptance of the Deanery of S. Paul’s, laid him open to the grave
suspicion of having acted from interested motives, and stirred up
much vehement animosity. A spirited, if not an impartial, account of
this controversy, is given by Lord Macaulay.[216]
Sir Christopher’s remarkable invention appears to have survived the
laughter against it, and to have remained in the Cathedral until
1803.
The vaults of S. Paul’s were opened shortly after this thanksgiving to
receive the body of Dr. White, the non-juring Bishop of
Peterborough, whose funeral was attended by Bishop Turner, Bishop
Lloyd and forty nonjuring clergymen.
At the beginning of the following year, as soon
as travelling was possible, Wren sent his son
Christopher to Paris; not indeed with the
intention of his making that grand tour which a few years later was
supposed to finish a young gentleman’s education, but that he might
acquire a little experience and knowledge of the world. The young
man, evidently, had other ideas, spent a good deal of his money,
and then wrote home to his family a letter complaining in true
English fashion, of the climate and the cookery of France, and asking
leave to continue his journey to Italy. Sir Christopher’s reply has
been preserved; and in its folio sheet and brown ink exists in the
‘Parentalia.’ It is, I think, so charming as to double one’s regret that
so very few of his letters have been preserved.
[217]
‘Whi
teha
ll, March 7.
‘My dear Son,—I hope by this time you are pretty well satisfied
of the condition of the climate you are in; if not, I believe you
44. will ere Lent be over; and will learne to dine upon sallad; and
morue with egges will scarce be allowed: if you thinke you can
dine better cheape in Italy you can trie, but I think the passing
of the Alpes and other dangers of disbanded armies and
abominable Lodgings will ballance that advantage; but the
seeing of fine buildings I perceive temptes you, and your
companion, Mr. Strong, whose inclination and interest leades
him, by neither of which can I find you are mov’d; but how doth
it concerne you? You would have it to say hereafter that you
have seen Rome, Naples and a hundred other fine places; a
hundred others can say as much and more; calculate whither
this be worth the expence and hazard as to any advantage at
youre returne. I sent you to France at a time of businesse and
when you might make your observations and find acquaintance
who might hereafter be usefull to you in the future concernes of
your life: if this be your ayme I willingly let you proceed,
provided you will soon returne, for these reasons, the little I
have to leave you is unfortunately involved in trouble, and your
presence would be a comfort to me, to assist me, not only for
my sake, but your own that you might understand your affaires,
before it shall please God to take me from you, which if
suddenly will leave you in perplexity and losse. I doe not say all
this out of parsimony, for what you spend will be out of what
will in short time, be your owne, but I would have you be a man
of businesse as early as you can bring your thoughts to it. I
hope, by your next you will give me account of the reception of
our ambassador;[218] of the intrigues at this time between the
two nations, of the establishment of the commerce, and of
anything that may be innocently talked of without danger, and
reflection, that I may perceive whither you look about you or
noe and penetrate into what occurres, or whither the world
passes like a pleasant dream, or the amusement of fine scenes
in a play without considering the plot. If you have in ten weeks
spent half your bill of exchange besides your gold, I confesse
your money will not hold out, either abroad for yourself or for
45. us at home to supply you, especially if you goe for Italy, which
voyage forward and backward will take up more than twenty
weekes: thinke well of it, and let me hear more from you, for
though I would advise you, I will not discontent you. Mr. Strong
hath profered credit by the same merchant he uses for his son,
and I will thinke of it, but before I change, you must make up
your account with your merchant, and send it to me. My hearty
service to young Mr. Strong and tell him I am obliged to him for
your sake. I blesse God for your health, and pray for the
continuance of it through all adventures till it pleases him to
restore you to your Sister and friends who wish the same as
doth
‘Your most affectionate Father,
‘Chr. Wren.
‘P.S. Poor Billy continues in his indisposition, and I fear is lost to
me and the world, to my great discomfort and your future
sorrow.’
What answer the younger Christopher sent does not appear; but his
father did not ‘discontent’ him; the young man did make the journey
to Italy, then such a formidable undertaking, and was ever after
reckoned a very accomplished and travelled gentleman. ‘Young Mr.
Strong’ must have been the son of Sir Christopher’s faithful master-
mason, Edward Strong, one of a great family of builders and stone-
cutters; I suppose the ‘poor Billy’ of the postscript to have been the
writer’s youngest son, then nearly nineteen, who however recovered
and outlived his father by about fifteen years.
The Royal Society had sustained a severe loss by Charles II.’s death,
and if King James took little interest in their discussions, William III.
was utterly indifferent. Still it had won a certain position of its own,
and was able to keep its steady course. Wren remained one of the
members who attended most regularly and contributed to
discussions on a variety of subjects, though not perhaps on the
‘jessamine-scented gloves,’ which figure so often in Pepys’ diary, the
46. ORDER AGAINST
SWEARING.
secret of whose perfumery Wren once undertook to find out. He was
again chosen Grand Master of the Freemasons, and continued in
that office until 1702.
His friend and fellow-member in the Royal
Society, Robert Boyle, had written a book called
‘A Free Discourse against Swearing,’ which was
published after his death. Wren followed this
up by an order which he had affixed in many parts of S. Paul’s, while
the building went on:—
‘Whereas, among labourers, &c. that ungodly custom of
swearing is too frequently heard, to the dishonour of God and
contempt of authority; and to the end, therefore, that such
impiety may be utterly banished from these works, intended for
the service of God and the honour of religion—it is ordered that
customary swearing shall be a sufficient crime to dismiss any
labourer that comes to the call, and the clerk of the works, upon
sufficient proof, shall dismiss them accordingly, and if any
master, working by task, shall not, upon admonition, reform this
profanation among his apprentices, servants and labourers, it
shall be construed his fault; and he shall be liable to be
censured by the Commissioners.’
Such was Sir Christopher’s care for his grand work: it was intended
for the service of God, and therefore was to have no blemish which
Wren’s diligence could avoid. He was constantly there and shrank
neither from fatigue nor from risk. The famous Duchess of
Marlborough, in her quarrels with Vanbrugh over the building of
Blenheim, complained bitterly that he asked 300l. a year for himself
and a salary for his clerk, ‘when it is well-known that Sir Christopher
Wren was content to be dragged up in a basket three or four times a
week to the top of S. Paul’s, and at great hazard, for 200l. a year.’
Probably it was because her Grace considered his charges so
moderate that, after her last quarrel with Vanbrugh, she engaged Sir
Christopher to build Marlborough House, at the corner of Pall Mall.
The site presented great difficulties, but the building in red brick and
47. S. DUNSTAN’S
SPIRE.
stone was a handsome one, and lately has been much enlarged.
Vanbrugh’s first start in life was his being engaged by Wren to act as
clerk of the works to the buildings at Greenwich. Gibbs and
Hawksmoor were also pupils of Wren’s, and worked under him at
some of the innumerable works on which he was engaged. The
building of Greenwich was vigorously continued, and in 1705,[219]
‘they began to take in wounded and worn-out seamen, who are
exceedingly well provided for.’
At the beginning of 1698, Peter the Great made his extraordinary
voyage to England and took possession of Evelyn’s house, Sayes
Court, at Deptford, in order to be near the dockyard and inspect the
ship-building. He was anything but a desirable tenant. ‘There is a
house full of people and right nasty,’ wrote Evelyn’s servant.
‘The Czar lies next your library, and dines in the parlour next
your study. He dines at ten o’clock and six at night, is very
seldom at home a whole day, very often in the King’s yard, or by
water, dressed in several dresses. The King is expected here this
day, the best parlour is pretty clean for him to be entertained.
The King pays for all he has.’[220]
The Czar’s three months’ occupancy of Sayes Court left it a wreck,
and Evelyn got Sir Christopher, and the Royal gardener, Mr. Loudon,
to go down and estimate the repairs which would be necessary.
They allowed 150l. in their report to the Treasury, but could not by
any money replace the beautiful holly hedge through which Peter
the Great had been trundled in a wheel-barrow, or repair the garden
he had laid waste.
In 1699, Wren finished the last of those City
churches which the Fire had injured or
destroyed. S. Dunstan’s in the East had
suffered severely by the Fire: the walls of the
church had not fallen, but the interior had been much damaged and
the monument to the famous sailor and discoverer, Sir John
Hawkins, who was buried there, perished. The old church had a lofty
48. wooden spire cased with lead, which of course fell and was
consumed. When Sir Christopher had repaired the body of the
building the parishioners were anxious to have back the spire also,
and Dame Dionis Williamson, a Norfolk lady, who had been a great
benefactress to S. Mary’s, Bow, gave 400l. towards this object. It is
one of the most curious of all Wren’s spires, as it rests on four
arches springing from the angles of the tower. Three more such
spires exist, two in Scotland and one at Newcastle. Tradition says
that the steeple of S. Dunstan’s was the design or the suggestion of
Wren’s daughter Jane. Perhaps, like the leaning tower of Pisa, it is
more wonderful than satisfactory to the eye, but Sir Christopher was
certainly proud of it and confident in its stability. Great crowds
assembled to see the supports taken away, and Wren watched with
a telescope, says the story, on London Bridge for the rocket which
announced that all was safely done, but it is hardly probable that he
was anxious about the result.
Four years later, when the tempest known as the ‘great storm’ raged
in England, destroying twelve ships in the Royal navy, many
merchant vessels, and a great number of buildings, some one came
with a long face to tell Sir Christopher, that ‘all the steeples in
London had suffered;’ he replied at once, ‘Not S. Dunstan’s, I am
sure.’ He was perfectly right, and the account given of the others
was an exaggeration.
On February 1, 1699, the Morning Prayer Chapel of S. Paul’s was
opened for service. Later in the same month, a fire broke out at the
west end of the choir, where ‘Father Smith’ was still at work. It
caused considerable alarm, and was got under with some damage,
especially to two of the pillars, and to a decorated arch. The gilding
also lost some of its brightness. A nameless poem[221] fixes the date
of this fire, which has been much disputed. It may have been in
consequence of this alarm that Sir Christopher covered all the
woodwork of the upper parts of the Cathedral with ‘a fibrous
concrete’ said to resist fire so well that faggots might be kindled
below it with impunity.
49. WESTMINSTER
ABBEY.
While S. Paul’s was thus advancing towards its
full beauty, the care of Westminster Abbey was
assigned to Wren. Little or no attention seems
to have been spent on it between the time of
Charles I.’s reign and that in which it was handed over to Wren.
With the energy which his sixty-seven years had not checked, he
examined the grand building where he had worshipped as a
schoolboy, and instantly ordered some of the most needful repairs.
In 1713 he sent in a statement to Dr. Atterbury, who was both
Bishop of Rochester and Dean of Westminster, having in that year
succeeded to Wren’s old friend, Bishop Sprat: from this paper,
though it is anticipating the date, some extracts are here given.
‘When I had the Honour to attend your Lordship, to
congratulate your Episcopal Dignity, and pay that Respect which
particularly concerned myself as employed in the chief Direction
of the Works and Repairs of the Collegiate-Church of S. Peter in
Westminster, you was pleased to give me this seasonable
admonition, that I should consider my advanced Age; and as I
had already made fair steps in the Reparation of that ancient
and ruinous Structure, you thought it very requisite for the
publick Service, I should leave a Memorial of what I had done,
and what my Thoughts were for carrying on the Works for the
future.’ Then follows the history of the building of the abbey up
to the reign of Henry III., who rebuilt it ‘according to the Mode
which came into Fashion after the Holy War.
‘This we now call the Gothick manner of Architecture (so the
Italians called what was not after the Roman style), tho’ the
Goths were rather Destroyers than Builders; I think it should
with more Reason be called the Saracen Style; for those People
wanted neither Arts nor Learning, and after we in the West had
lost both, we borrowed again from them, out of their Arabick
Books, what they with great Diligence had translated from the
Greeks.... They built their Mosques round, disliking the Christian
form of a Cross: the old quarries whence the Ancients took their
50. THE ORIGINAL
INTENTION.
large blocks of marble for whole Columns and Architraves were
neglected, for they thought both impertinent. Their carriage was
by camels, therefore their Buildings were fitted for small stones,
and Columns of their own fancy consisting of many pieces, and
their Arches were pointed without key-stones which they
thought too heavy. The Reasons were the same in our Northern
Climates abounding in free stone, but wanting marble.... The
Saracen mode of building seen in the East, soon spread over
Europe and particularly in France, the Fashions of which nation
we affected to imitate in all ages, even when we were at enmity
with it.’...
Wren laments over the mixture of oak with the less-enduring
chestnut wood in the roof of the Abbey, and the use of Rygate stone
which absorbed water, and in a frost scaled off. He says he cut all
the ragged ashlar work of Rygate stone out of the east window,
replacing it with durable Burford stone, and secured all the
buttresses on the south side. The north side of the Abbey is so
choked up by buildings, and so shaken in parts by vaults rashly dug
close to its buttresses, that he can do little.
‘I have yet said nothing of King Henry VIIth’s Chapel, a nice
embroidered Work and performed with tender Caen stone, and
though lately built in comparison, is so eaten up by our
Weather, that it begs for some compassion, which I hope the
Sovereign Power will take as it is the Regal Sepulture.’
The most necessary outward repairs of stone-
work, he says, are one-third part done; the
north front, and the great Rose Window there
are very ruinous; he has prepared a proper
design for them. Having summed up the repairs still essential for the
security of the building, he proceeds to state what are, in his
judgment, the parts of the original design for the Abbey still
unfinished.
‘The original intention was plainly to have had a Steeple, the
Beginnings of which appear on the corners of the Cross, but left
51. off before it rose so high as the Ridge of the Roof, and the Vault
of the Quire under it, is only Lath and Plaister, now rotten and
must be taken care of.
I have made a Design, which will not be very expensive but
light, but still in the Gothick Form, and of a Style with the rest of
the structure, which I would strictly adhere to, throughout the
whole intention: to deviate from the old Form would be to run
into a disagreeable mixture which no Person of a good Taste
could relish. I have varied a little from the usual Form, in giving
twelve sides to the Spire instead of eight, for Reasons, to be
discerned upon the Model.
‘The Angles of Pyramids in the Gothick Architecture were usually
enriched with the Flower the Botanists call the Calceolus, which
is a proper form to help workmen to ascend on the outside to
amend any defects, without raising large scaffolds upon every
slight occasion; I have done the same, being of so good Use, as
well as agreeable Ornament.... It is evident, as observed before,
the two West Towers were left imperfect, and have continued so
since the Dissolution of the Monastery, one much higher than
the other, though still too low for Bells, which are stifled by the
Height of the Roof above them; they ought certainly to be
carried to an equal Height, one story above the ridge of the
Roof, still continuing the Gothick manner, in the stone-work, and
tracery.... It will be most necessary to rebuild the great North
Window with Portland stone, to answer the South Rose Window
which was well rebuilt about forty years since; the stair-cases at
the corners and Pyramids set upon them conformable to the old
style to make the whole of a piece.... For all these new
Additions I have prepared perfect Draughts and Models, such as
I conceive may agree with the original scheme of the old
architect, without any modern mixtures to show my own
Inventions: in like manner as I have among the Parochial
52. ‘MODERN
MIXTURES.’
Churches of London given some few Examples (where I was
obliged to deviate from a better style), which appear not
ungraceful, but ornamental to the East part of the city; and it is
to be hoped, by the publick care, the West part also, in good
time will be as well adorned: and surely by nothing more
properly than a lofty Spire and Western Towers to Westminster
Abbey.’
With this, still unfulfilled hope, Wren’s interesting paper closes. Nine
years afterwards he did, however, finish the north front, commonly
known as Solomon’s Porch.
Wren is so commonly spoken of as having built
—and spoilt—the western towers, that it is well
here to mention that his share in them is very
small; he only restored with a careful hand the
lower portion of the towers then standing.[222] They were continued
by Hawksmoor after Wren’s death, and by two other architects in
succession after the death of Hawksmoor in 1736. No one of these
had, as Wren had, the high-minded desire to do justice to ‘the
original architect without any modern mixtures of my own.’
53. CHAPTER XIII.
1700–1708.
MEMBER FOR WEYMOUTH—RISING OF THE SAP IN TREES—
PRINCE GEORGE’S STATUE—JANE WREN’S DEATH—
THANKSGIVING AT S. PAUL’S—LETTER TO HIS SON—SON
MARRIES MARY MUSARD—DEATH OF MR. EVELYN—QUEEN
ANNE’S ACT FOR BUILDING FIFTY CHURCHES—LETTER ON
CHURCH BUILDING.
‘The old knight turning about his head twice or thrice to take a
survey of this great metropolis, bid me observe how thick the
City was set with churches, and that there was scarce a single
steeple on this side Temple Bar. “A most heathenish sight!” says
Sir Roger; “there is no religion at this end of the town. The fifty
new churches will very much mend the prospect, but church
work is slow, church work is slow.”’—The Spectator, No. 383.
In 1700 Wren was returned by the boroughs of Weymouth and
Melcombe Regis to a somewhat stormy Parliament.
He was finishing several of the City churches by the addition of
towers to some, where, as at S. Magnus, London Bridge, and S.
Andrew’s, Holborn, the main parts had been previously built.
He gave a design for All Saints’ Church, Isleworth; it was, however,
reckoned too costly, and nothing was done until, in 1705, Sir
Orlando Gee left a legacy of 500l. towards the rebuilding of the
church, when Wren’s design was partially adopted, and the work
done by his faithful master-mason, Edward Strong.[223]
With all this work, Wren yet found time to write a treatise on ‘The
rising of the sap in trees.’ It is a short treatise, evidently copied by a
54. copyist, though a little indian-ink drawing at the side is probably
Wren’s own. The question in dispute seems to have been whether
this natural rising of the sap contradicted the newly discovered law
of gravity.
‘It is wonderful,’ he says, ‘to see the rising of the sap in Trees.
All will bleed more or less when they are tapped by boring a
hole through the Bark, some very considerably, as Birch, which
will afford as much liquor every day almost as the milke of a
cow; in a Vine when a bough is cut off it will if not stopped
bleed to death. Now by what mechanisme is water raised to
such a height, as in Palmitos to 120 foot high? A skillfull
Engineer cannot effect this without great force and a
complicated engine, which Nature doth without sensible motion;
it steals up as freely as the water descends: the reason of this is
obscure as yett to naturalists.’
After some discussion of various theories, he proceeds to show by
the help of the little drawing, ‘that the onely Vicissitudes of heat and
cold in ye aire is sufficient to raise the sap to the height of the
loftiest trees.’ Then follows the proof of this by mechanics refuting
the notion of
‘a secret motion in nature contrary to that of the gravity, by
which plants aspire upwards.
‘But though I have shown how the sap may be mechanically
raised from the Root to the top of the loftiest trees, yett how it
comes to be varyed according to the particular nature of the
Tree by a Fermentation in the Root; how the Raine water
entering the Root acquires a spirit that keeps it from freezing,
but also gives it such distinguishing tastes and qualities is
beyond mechanical Philosophy to describe and may require a
great collection of Phenomena with a large history of plants to
shew how they expand the leaves and produce the Seed and
Fruit from the same Raine water so wonderfully diversified and
continued since the first Creation.’
55. LONDON AS IT
WAS.
Another paper of the same date was written ‘On the surface of the
terrestrial Globe,’ but this does not appear to have been preserved.
Many of Sir Christopher’s writing’s and many also of his inventions
were lost by Mr. Oldenburg, the Royal Society’s secretary, of whom
Wren frequently complained that he not only neglected to enter
them on the Society’s Register, but conveyed them to France and
Germany, where they appeared, attributed as inventions to those
who had stolen them.
One cannot but admire the versatility of mind which enabled Wren,
in the midst of great architectural works, and endless business
details, to write papers such as these, and to digest and decide upon
Flamsteed’s long letters on the Earth’s motion, his quarrels with Mr.
Halley, and his measurement of the height of the Welsh hills.
The progress of Greenwich and Chelsea
Hospitals, the growth of his beautiful S. Paul’s,
the repairs of the Abbey, were now the
absorbing interests of Wren’s life. From the
house in Whitehall which he occupied with his daughter he could
easily reach the two former by water, or the latter on foot. Two most
interesting pictures by Canaletto,[224] giving a general view of the
city and of Westminster, enable us to realise what the whole effect
must have been in an atmosphere far clearer than at present, before
the river was cut by iron bridges, or the city robbed of steeple or
tower. The death of King William and the accession of Queen Anne
in the spring of 1702 made little difference to Wren, except to his
advantage. He appears to have been on very good terms with her,
and with her Danish husband. He is said to have built S. Anne’s,
Soho,[225] and to have made it externally to resemble a Danish
church as much as he could, out of compliment to Prince George. He
also gave to the Town Hall of Windsor, a statue of Prince George, to
correspond with that of Queen Anne. The Prince is dressed in a
Roman costume, and the pedestal has the following inscription:
SERENISSIMO PRINCIPI
GEORGII PRINCIPI DANIAE
56. THANKSGIVING AT
S. PAUL’S.
HEROI OMNI SAECULO VENERANDO
CHRISTOPHORUS WREN, ARM:
POSUIT MDCCXIII.
One marvels how ‘Est-il possible’ came to merit such an inscription
as this!
In 1702 Sir Christopher suffered a grievous loss
by the death of his only daughter, Jane, on the
29th of December. She was laid in the vault of
S. Paul’s close to the graves of Dr. and Mrs.
Holder,[226] and her father wrote the short Latin inscription which
records her virtues, her skill in music, and implies how loving and
how congenial a companion he had lost in her. She was but twenty-
six when she died. The sculptor, Bird,[227] of whose power Wren had
a good opinion, carved a monument in low relief, representing Jane
Wren playing on an organ; a harp and a spinnet are beside her, and
a group of angels in the clouds above, one of whom holds the music.
It is but an ordinary piece of monumental sculpture, now much
obscured by dust. Jane Wren’s death must have left a great blank in
the life of the father whose interests and pursuits she had shared,
and one wishes she could have lived long enough to see the top
stone laid on the dome of S. Paul’s. The Duke of Marlborough’s
brilliant victory at Blenheim, on Aug. 13, 1704, brought Queen Anne
and all her court in their utmost splendour to a thanksgiving at S.
Paul’s on the 7th of September.
‘The streets were scaffolded from Temple Bar, where the Lord
Mayor presented her Majesty with the Sword, which she
returned. Every Company was ranged under its banners, the
Citty Militia without the rails, which were all hung with cloth
suitable to the colour of the banner. The Lord Mayor, Sheriffs
and Aldermen were in their scarlet robes, with caparisoned
horses; the Knight Marshall on horseback, the Foot Guards; the
Queen in a rich coach with eight horses, none with her but the
Duchess of Marlborough in a very plain garment, the Queene
full of jewells. Music and trumpets at every Citty Company. The
57. BARCELONA.
great Officers of the Crown, Nobility and Bishops, all in coaches
with six horses, besides innumerable servants, went to S. Paul’s
where the Deane preached. After this the Queen went back in
the same order to S. James’s. The Citty Companies feasted all
the nobility and Bishops, and illuminated at night. Music for the
Church and anthems by the best masters. The day before wet
and stormy, but this was one of the most serene and calm days
that had been all the year.’[228]
No doubt it was a splendid pageant, the grandest that had been
seen since those which celebrated the Restoration, and S. Paul’s,
despite the scaffolding still round the dome, must have looked
magnificent. In 1705, Sir Christopher’s eldest son went abroad
again, travelling this time to Holland, where in the excitement of
Marlborough’s brilliant campaign he very nearly joined the army as a
volunteer.
A letter[229] to him from Sir Christopher is
extant; the handwriting is not quite so steady
as in the former letter, but still clear.
‘Whitehall, Oct. 11, 1705.
‘Dear Son,—I received at once three of yr
letrs
: one from Harlem,
Sep. 26, another from Amsterdam of Sep. 28, O.S., a third of
Oct. 13, N.S., by all which I rejoyced in your good Health & your
recovery from your cold. I am very well satisfied you have layd
aside your designe for the Army; which I think had not been
safe or pertinent, at least not soe much as Bookes &
Conversation with ye learned. Your Traffic for good Bookes I
cannot disapprove. You tell me Gronovius[230] is 25 volumes, I
am told they are 26, and that the last is the best & comonly sold
by its selfe, you will have a care [a word seems to be omitted]
being imposed upon. Mr. Bateman in his (?) will give you advice
how you may get them into the Secretary’s packets. You
remember how much trouble Mr. Strong was put to at Dover by
the impertinence of the Customer there. I hope this may bee
58. prevented. Wee have not yet rejoyced for Barcelona[231] though
you have; though wee doe not doubt it and wagers are layd 6
to one: last night the seales were given to Mr. Cowper &
changes are made of Lord Lieutenants. Give my Service to Mr.
Roman & thanks for his Civilities to you. I am importuned to
take a little journy to my cosin Munson’s to christen her 8th
son.
Wee are told here that my Ld
D. of Marlborough goeth certainly
to Vienna, & you resolve well to wait on him before he goes, &
then I thinke you have little else to doe but to take the best
opportunity to returne, which I am told may happen if you come
with my Ld
Woodstock[232] who will have convoy. Wee are all in
good health at both Houses and wish you happinesse wch
wee
also contrive for you.
‘I am, dear Son, your affectionate Father,
‘Chr. Wren.’
I suppose the mention of ‘both houses,’ and the hint of happiness
being contrived, refer to young Christopher’s marriage, which took
place in the following year. He married Mary,[233] daughter of Mr.
Philip Musard, jeweller to Queen Anne, by whom he had a son, a
fourth Christopher Wren.
Wren lost a faithful and valued friend in Mr. Evelyn, who died in the
February of 1706, at the age of eighty-five. If Evelyn’s diary, of
which such frequent use has been made in these pages, is not the
same entire revelation of the man himself as is the diary of his friend
Pepys, it yet possesses a singular charm in its refinement of thought,
and, when the veil is raised, shows us a gentleman and a Christian
to be respected as well as loved. He had kept up a steady friendship
with Sir Christopher since the day when they first met at Oxford, and
had the highest opinion of his powers: ‘an excellent genius had this
incomparable person,’ is his remark after a conversation with Wren.
Evelyn was on the S. Paul’s Commission from the first, and Wren
was destined, a few years later, sorely to miss the support of this
constant friend.
59. FIFTY NEW
CHURCHES.
The needful sum for covering in the dome of S. Paul’s was voted by
Parliament in 1708. The question of using copper or lead was greatly
discussed; lead was finally chosen; it does not clearly appear which
way Sir Christopher’s judgment inclined. Probably to the lead, as he
considered it susceptible of much ornament, and the lead covering
of S. Paul’s dome is peculiarly beautiful. Bird in this year finished the
statue of Queen Anne, which is in the fore court of the Cathedral,
and is not without merit. He also carved the relief of the Conversion
of S. Paul above the western portico: the height is too great for it to
be possible to judge of the goodness of the sculpture.
The Act known as ‘Queen Anne’s Act for
building Fifty New Churches’ was passed in this
year, and Wren was of course one of the
commissioners. At the age of seventy-six he
could not undertake the designing of these new churches. They
were principally built by Gibbs, Hawksmoor, Vanbrugh and others. S.
George’s, Hanover Square, S. Anne’s, Limehouse, S. George’s,
Bloomsbury, S. Leonard’s, Shoreditch, are some of those built under
this Act. Perhaps the best specimen is the beautiful S. Mary-le-
Strand, built by Gibbs, on an old site stolen from the Church by the
Duke of Somerset in the reign of Henry VIII. Recent careful painting
and gilding and the removal of pews have made S. Mary’s a
charming example of the amount of decoration which can be
advantageously bestowed on a Paladian church.
Wren wrote on this occasion a letter to a friend on the Church-
building Commission in which he gives the result of his great
experience in building town churches. The letter is given with a few
omissions. I fear that few of the Queen Anne churches were built
strictly on the principles he here lays down; certainly the hint as to
pews was disregarded, and grievous indeed have been the results of
such disregard. It has been a common fallacy that all Wren’s
churches were built for pews, and that anything but high pews
would ruin the architectural effect. What was Wren’s own opinion is
manifest from the letter; the actual effect can be seen, for instance,
in a print of S. Stephen’s, Walbrook, where this gem of all his
60. CEMETERIES.
churches is represented, just after its completion, with the area
clear; or in S. Mary’s, Bow, where the pews have lately been
diminished into just such ‘benches’ as the great architect desired.
‘Since Providence,’ he writes, ‘in great mercy has protracted my
age, to the finishing the Cathedral Church of S. Paul, and the
parochial churches of London, in lieu of those demolished by the
fire, (all which were executed during the fatigues of my
employment in the service of the Crown from that time to the
present happy reign); and being now constituted one of the
Commissioners for building, pursuant to the late Act, fifty more
Churches in London and Westminster; I shall presume to
communicate briefly my sentiments, after long experience, and
without further ceremony exhibit to better judgement, what at
present occurs to me, in a transient view of this whole affair;
not doubting but that the debates of the worthy Commissioners
may hereafter give me occasion to change, or add to these
speculations.
‘1. I conceive the Churches should be built, not where vacant
ground may be cheapest purchased in the extremities of the
suburbs, but among the thicker inhabitants, for the convenience
of the better sort, although the site of them should cost more;
the better inhabitants contributing most to the future repairs,
and the ministers and officers of the church, and charges of the
parish.
‘2. I could wish that all burials in churches
might be disallowed, which is not only
unwholesome, but the pavements can never
be kept even, nor pews upright; and if the churchyard be close
about the church, this also is inconvenient, because the ground
being continually raised by the graves, occasions, in time, a
descent by steps in the church, which renders it damp, and the
walls green, as appears evidently in all old churches.
‘3. It will be enquired, where then shall be the burials? I answer,
in cemeteries seated in the outskirts of the town....
61. CHURCHWARDEN’
S CARE
DEFECTIVE.
‘A piece of ground of two acres in the fields will be purchased
for much less than two roods among the buildings; this being
enclosed with a strong brick wall, and having a walk round, and
two cross walks decently planted with yew trees, the four
quarters may serve four parishes, where the dead need not be
disturbed at the pleasure of the sexton or piled four or five upon
one another, or bones thrown out to gain room.... It may be
considered further, that if the cemeteries be thus thrown into
the fields, they will bound the excessive growth of the city with
a graceful border, which is now encircled with scavengers’ dung-
stalls.
‘4. As to the situation of the churches, I should propose they be
brought as forward as possible into the larger and more open
streets; not in obscure lanes, nor where coaches will be much
obstructed in the passage: nor are we, I think, too nicely to
observe east or west in the position, unless it falls out properly;
such fronts as shall happen to lie most open to view should be
adorned with porticoes, both for beauty and convenience; which
together with handsome spires or lanterns, rising in good
proportion above the neighbouring houses (of which I have
given several examples in the City of different forms), may be of
sufficient ornament to the town, without a great expense for
enriching the outward walls of the Churches, in which plainness
and duration ought principally, if not wholly, to be studied....
‘5. I shall mention something of the
materials for public fabrics. It is true, the
mighty demand for the hasty works of
thousands of houses at once after the Fire
of London, and the frauds of those who built by the great,(?)
have so debased the value of materials, that good bricks are not
to be now had without greater prices than formerly, and indeed,
if rightly made, will deserve them; but brickmakers spoil the
earth in the mixing and hasty burning, till the bricks will hardly
bear weight; though the earth about London, rightly managed,
will yield as good bricks as were the Roman bricks (which I have
62. often found in the old ruins of the City), and will endure, in our
air, beyond any stone our island affords; which, unless the
quarries lie near the sea, are too dear for general use. The best
is Portland or Roch-Abbey stone; but these are not without their
faults. The next material is the lime: chalk-lime is the constant
practice, which, well mixed with good sand, is not amiss, though
much worse than hard stone-lime. The vaulting of S. Paul’s is a
rendering as hard as stone: it is composed of cockle-shell lime
well beaten with sand: the more labour in the beating, the
better and stronger the mortar. I shall say nothing of marble
(though England, Scotland, and Ireland afford good, and of
beautiful colours); but this will prove too costly for our purpose,
unless for Altar-pieces. In windows and doors Portland stone
may be used, with good bricks and stone quoins. As to roofs,
good oak is certainly the best, because it will bear some
negligence. The churchwardens’ care may be defective in
speedy mending drips; they usually whitewash the church, and
set up their names, but neglect to preserve the roof over their
heads. It must be allowed, that the roof being more out of
sight, is still more unminded. Next to oak, is good yellow deal,
which is a timber of length, and light, and makes excellent work
at first; but, if neglected, will speedily perish; especially if
gutters (which is a general fault in builders) be made to run
upon the principal rafters, the ruin may be sudden. Our sea-
service for oak, and the wars in the North Sea, make timber at
present of excessive price. I suppose, ere long, we must have
recourse to the West Indies, where most excellent timber may
be had for cutting and fetching. Our tiles are ill made, and our
slates not good: lead is certainly the best and lightest covering,
and being of our own growth and manufacture, and lasting, if
properly laid, for many hundred years, is, without question, the
most preferable; though I will not deny but an excellent tile may
be made to be very durable: our artisans are not yet instructed
in it, and it is not soon done to inform them.... Now, if the
churches could hold each 2,000, it would yet be very short of
the necessary supply. The churches, therefore, must be large;
63. but still, in our reformed religion it should seem vain to make a
parish church larger than that all who are present can both hear
and see. The Romanists, indeed, may build larger churches; it is
enough if they hear the murmur of the Mass, and see the
elevation of the Host; but ours are to be fitted for auditories. I
can hardly think it practicable to make a single room so
capacious, with pews and galleries, as to hold above 2,000
persons, and all to hear the service, and both to hear distinctly,
and see the preacher. I endeavoured to effect this in building
the parish Church of S. James, Westminster, which, I presume,
is the most capacious, with these qualifications, that hath yet
been built; and yet, at a solemn time, when the church was
much crowded, I could not discern from a gallery that 2,000
were present. In this church I mention, though very broad, and
the middle nave arched up, yet as there are no walls of a
second order, nor lanterns, nor buttresses, but the whole roof
rests upon the pillars, as do also the galleries, I think it may be
found beautiful and convenient, and, as such, the cheapest of
any form I could invent.
‘7. Concerning the placing of the pulpit, I shall observe a
moderate voice may be heard fifty feet distant before the
preacher, thirty feet on each side, and twenty behind the pulpit;
and not this unless the pronunciation be distinct and equal,
without losing the voice at the last word of the sentence, which
is commonly emphatical, and, if obscured, spoils the whole
sense. A Frenchman is heard further than an English preacher,
because he raises his voice, and sinks not his last words: I
mention this as an insufferable fault in the pronunciation of
some of our otherwise excellent preachers, which schoolmasters
might correct in the young as a vicious pronunciation, and not
as the Roman orators spoke: for the principal verb is, in Latin,
usually the last word; and if that be lost, what becomes of the
sentence?
‘8. By what I have said, it may be thought reasonable, that the
new church should be at least sixty feet broad, and ninety feet
64. ‘NO PEWS, BUT
BENCHES.’
CLEAR BUILDING
GROUND.
long, besides a chancel at one end, and the belfry and portico at
the other.
‘These proportions may be varied; but to
build more than that every person may
conveniently hear and see is to create noise
and confusion. A church should not be so
filled with pews, but that the poor may have room enough to
stand and sit in the alleys; for to them equally is the Gospel
preached. It were to be wished there were to be no pews, but
benches; but there is no stemming the tide of profit, and the
advantage of pew-keepers; especially since by pews, in the
chapel of ease, the minister is chiefly supported. It is evident
these fifty churches are enough for the present inhabitants, and
the town will continually grow: but it is to be hoped, that
hereafter more may be added, as the wisdom of the
Government shall think fit; and, therefore, the parishes should
be so divided as to leave room for subdivisions, or at least for
chapels of ease.
‘I cannot pass over mentioning the
difficulties that may be found in obtaining
the ground proper for the sites of the
churches among the buildings, and the
cemeteries in the borders without the town; and, therefore, I
shall recite the method that was taken for purchasing in ground
at the north side of S. Paul’s Cathedral, where, in some places,
houses were but eleven feet distant from the fabric, exposing it
to the continual dangers of fires. The houses were seventeen,
and contiguous, all in leasehold of the Bishop, or Dean alone, or
the Dean and Chapter, or the petty-Canons, with divers under-
tenants. The first we recompensed in kind, with rents of like
value for them and their successors; but the tenants in
possession for a valuable consideration; which to find what it
amounted to, we learned by diligent inquiry, what the
inheritance of houses in that quarter were usually held at; this
we found was fifteen years’ purchase at the most, and,
65. proportionably to this, the value of each lease was easily
determined in a scheme, referring to a map. These rates, which
we resolved not to stir from, were offered to each; and, to cut
off much debate, which it may be imagined everyone would
abound in, they were assured that we went by one uniform
method, which could not be receded. We found two or three
reasonable men, who agreed to these terms; immediately we
paid them, and took down their houses; others, who stood out
at first, finding themselves in dust and rubbish, and that ready
money was better, as the case stood, than to continue paying
rent, repairs, and parish duties, easily came in. The whole
ground at last was cleared, and all concerned were satisfied,
and their writings given in.... This was happily finished without a
judicatory or jury; although, in our present case, we may find it
perhaps, sometimes necessary to have recourse to Parliament.’
66. CHAPTER XIV.
1709–1723.
PRIVATE HOUSES BUILT—QUEEN ANNE’S GIFTS—LAST STONE OF
S. PAUL’S—WREN DEPRIVED OF HIS SALARY—HIS PETITION
—‘FRAUDS AND ABUSES’—INTERIOR WORK OF S. PAUL’S—WREN
SUPERSEDED—PURCHASE OF WROXHALL ABBEY—WREN’S
THOUGHTS ON THE LONGITUDE—HIS DEATH—BURIAL IN S.
PAUL’S—THE END.
Heroick souls a nobler lustre find,
E’en from those griefs which break a vulgar mind.
That frost which cracks the brittle, common glass,
Makes Crystal into stronger brightness pass.
Bp. Thos. Sprat, quoted in Parentalia.
The year 1709 passed in steady work, and has little but finishing
touches to the churches to be recorded, unless some of the various
private houses built by Wren belong to this period. A house for Lord
Oxford, and one for the Duchess of Buckingham, both in S. James’s
Court; two built near the Thames for Lord Sunderland and Lord
Allaston; one for Lord Newcastle in Queen’s Square, Bloomsbury;
and a house, so large and magnificent that it has been divided in
late years into four, in Great Russell Street. This house was
afterwards occupied by Wren’s eldest son, and in turn by his second
son Stephen.
Sir Christopher himself, while keeping the house in Whitehall from
which his letters are dated, had received from Queen Anne the fifty
years’ lease of a house at Hampton Green at a nominal rent of 10l. a
year;[234] he must have found great refreshment in going there
occasionally by the then undefiled Thames, to country rest and