THE CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION & THE UNIVERSAL MATHEMATICAL MATRIX

THE CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION
THE CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION &
THE UNIVERSE MATHEMATICAL MATRIX
William John Meegan
SOMETHING FOR CONSIDERATION
SNOWFLAKE is a word that somewhat conveys definitively the nature of the soul whether
it consciously understand and submit itself to the Spiritual Law: i.e. God or not. The word
angel doesn’t quite address what the nature of the soul is. The soul is tabula rasa (blank
slate at conception) and its raison d’être (reason for existence) is to live and enjoy life.
The Spiritual Law (God) imbues the soul with its eternal raison d’être; whereas, human
parents gifts the soul with defined personality characteristics during the gestation period,
just as a snowflak e is imbued with a defined pattern. It is the unanimity of the raison d’être
and the parents gift of personality characteristics that the soul has to work with while
experiencing life via this amalgamating process on a conscious level. The soul flutters every
which way, like a snowflake in all directions, as is illustrated by the initiate that traverses the
labyrinth of Chartres Cathedral and as Christ said from the cross, “into thy hands I
commend my spirit.” This total absolute submission to the Spiritual Law, that is God, is the
a priori archetypal paradigm that every soul experiences in life consciously in the Garden of
Eden or unconsciously in the bowels of hell: i.e. mundane existence in the material world.
1

This article is all about how the ancient scribes envisaged the Word of God from out of
the psyche scientifically via reason and logic and how they imbued the Word of God into the
sacred scriptures of the world symbolically and alphanumerically; therefore the sacred
scriptures must be studied and read symbolically and alphanumerically letter by letter and
word by word. This work will demonstrate why it is that every imaginable thought that the
mind of man is capable of conceiving comes to the fore in the initiate’s quest to understand
what the sacred scriptures are trying to convey.
This is a new and an exceedingly radical approach to interpreting the Jueao Christian
Scriptures, at least from modernity perspective, and by extension the world’s sacred
literature. Here in this article, as in my other articles and published works, I bring to the
banquet not rhetoric, which is yesterday’s leftovers who’s recipes no one in modernity can
intuit and/or grasp intellectually; rather, I bring to the banquet scientifically discernible
evidence of all that I intuit and interpret from the sacred scriptures. I believe in
demonstrable evidence not the rhetoric of the ages.
This article is about to explode the mystical nature of the world that the Soul lives in. The
unbeliever that lives in the materialistic world, not knowing anything about God, spiritually
denies the psyche of the unbeliever from ever envisaging the mystical nature of the world. It
is only those that have regained their souls that are graced with the love of God: i.e. a vision
of God. It is hoped that the initiate learning the mystical nature of the Judeao Christian
Scriptures can earn his or her birthright that is the vision from God, which will enable him or
her to see the mystical nature of the world: i.e. the soul learning about itself.
Have you discerned the difference between the Labyrinth and the Maze? Believe it o r not
these two concepts are often interchangeable amongst scholars. The Labyrinth has but one
path to the center, which the Holy Spirit guides the initiate along it path every way it turns;
whereas, the Maze is a worldly device created by the mental acuity of ego-consciousness.
The Maze has many paths to its objective, which has no guide and often a person would lose
his mind along the way because of the many chaotic directional paths to the end goal and an
unguided individual could possibly end up in an insane asylum.
2

PREAMBLE
THE CYCLES AND THE MATRIX
How did the ancient sages envisage the WORD OF GOD1? And how did these scribes of
antiquity transcribe that message into what is known today as the sacred scriptures? This is
what this article is all about and intends to definitively illustrate. I am perfectly qualified to
perform this task seeing that I have been mysteriously guided by the Holy Spi rit for the past
forty-years. I will speak of that spiritual process as I unravel some of the mysteries culled out
of the first four chapters of Genesis in this article.
The sacred scriptures of the world were written, via each of its volumes, mythologically in
the very selfsame manner in which dreams2 are experienced by the individual; however,
dreams are subjective3; whereas, scriptural writing is a very objective and precision science,
which uses the SEVEN LIBERAL ARTS: Arithmetic, Music/Harmony, Geometry,
Astronomy/Astrology, Grammar, Rhetoric and Logic/Dialectics in unanimity as one integrated
science to codify the WORD OF GOD into the mythoi of the culture. In this manner only the
surface mythological storyline is available to the masses; whereas, the esoteric nature of the
texts, alphanumerically structured, is available only to the initiate that understand the art of
scriptural writing (esotericism). In today’s modern world this ancient practice of using the
disciplines of the SEVEN LIBERAL ARTS as one unified scientific system of thought is forgotten
and no longer in used simply because the WORD OF GOD is no longer being scribed into any
new mythological storylines. It is the goal of this article to demonstrate how the SEVEN
LIBERAL ARTS were used and codified into the sacred scriptures to convey the WORD OF
GOD.
The Judeao Christian Scriptures as a library of books is merely a cultural religion system4
via a complex mechanism created solely as a mnemonic device so that the SOUL would never
forget its true spiritual origins. The Judeao Christian Scriptures completely reveals the vision
that God graces the initiate with, in such a manner, that nothing is left to chance. When the
initiate understand the sacred scriptures, the incarnation of Christ, he or she will know God
the Father: as Christ said, “Whoever has seen me has seen the father (John 14:9)”.
1 I, personal ly, define the word GOD as “impersonal universal spiritual law, which is impossible to infringe upon”.
Ignorance of thi s law i s no excuse for not knowing i t.
2 During sleep ego-consciousness submerges into the depths of the dynamic vortex of the uncons cious mind and
becomes completely subservient to i t as in being a captive audience. Whi le in thi s s tate of deep-s leep ego-cons
ciousness neither thinks nor acts for i tself, in any manner whatsoever, it just experiences what the uncons cious
mind provides it. This vortex of the unconscious mind has neither sounds nor pictures nor dialogue nor any sensual
and/or materialistic qualities whatsoever; however, upon awakening ego-consciousness records that experience, that
was just experienced while s leeping, in the dynamic vortex of the uncons cious mind, into a verbal or wri tten
commentary; thus, calling i t a dream. This dreaming process is actual ly a precursor (preview) to the ini tiate that
cons ciously dialogues with the uncons cious mind; thus , creating the Garden of Eden in the real world. Ego -
cons ciousness and the unconscious mind become equals; thus, creating a spiritual haven conscious ly. It i s as i f the
ini tiate having been reborn reta ins the knowledge he or she gained throughout hi s or her l i fe.
3 Dreams are subjective; because, they are personal to the dreamer and because dreams are extremely di fficul t to
recol lect in any amount of deta i l upon awakening.
4 Every rel igion around the world has their own esoteric method in which they codified the WORD OF GOD into thei r
sacred scriptures, which would have to be somewhat similar to how the Judeao Christian Scriptures were s tructured.
3

The WORD OF GOD is a commentary on the MONAD (Christ), which is not GOD the FATHER5;
rather, it is Christ, the Son of GOD and the commentary on the MONAD: God/Man Christ is in
the form of a ten by ten (10 x 10) matrix6, which is the incarnation of Christ (the body and blood
of Christ), which I will explain and lay out graphically in a far greater detail in this article. The
commentary on the MONAD: God/Man Christ, itself, is ethereal for it does not exist in the world
per se; rather, it exists in the world materialistically only insofar as it is scribed and mythologized
5 The white area of this graphic image really does not exist outside of my pointing out i ts location, via an imaginative
perspective, as to where GOD the Father would be represented in thi s psychic s chema. Actual ly GOD the Father
(whi te area) would take up the whole of creation in a blazing white -l ight where color, uncons cious mind, ego-cons
4
ciousnes s and material i sm are nonexi s tent.
6 I have named this 10 x 10 square THE UNIVERSAL MATHEMATICAL MATRIX: Prima Materia (Perennial Matrix) . Thi s
matrix i s merely a prototype so-to-speak for discuss ion purposes ; however, the matrix goes out infinitely in al l
conceivable di rections : up, down, eas t, wes t, south, north, etc., etc. Thi s matrix mus t be seen in thi s three
dimensional perspective in order to grasp the complexities of the creatio continua. Thi s is how the sacred s criptures
of the worl d conve y i t. Ea ch i ndividual’s psyche’s platform of e xistence ce nters on this matrix symbolically the same
a s Al addin’s Ca rpet. In fact every s ingle residential s treet (block to block i s that matrix incarnated into the world.
http://www.slideshare.net/williamjohnmeegan/universal-mathematical-matrix-how-was-it-created I recommend that
the ini tiate read thi s paper to get a sense of other material s cul led out of the fi rs t chapter of Genes i s .
https ://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=802813819758034andset=a.476658662373553.110526.1000008827091
41andtype=1andtheater This matrix in the world is symbolically creatio continua based upon thi s New Jerusalem
(John’s Re ve l a ti ons ).

into the sacred scriptures of the world; however, the SOUL (MONAD) permeated this
commentary, which is personified as the psyche: unconscious mind and ego-consciousness.
addition this commentary of the MONAD: God/Man Christ is projected out into the outer
darkness mystically creating the material world into a pristine Garden of Eden (House or
of God). In the above diagram I have colored coded that portion of the cycle MONAD:
Christ in purple to denote that He is the King of Kings and that He symbolically represents the
MONAD: God/Man, which is the Soul. The SOUL7 periodically through erroneous thoughts
transformed into the divisiveness of the psyche, via the commentary on the MONAD:
Christ. The unconscious mind and ego-consciousness symbolizes another pair of opposites,
which is the human psyche that is diametrically opposite to Christ. The Garden of Eden
(MONAD [Vesica Piscis]: Christ: God/Man = SELF = SOUL) is actually the first set of opposites;
however, it is not connected to the erroneous psychic transformation of the SOUL into the
psyche: ego-consciousness and the unconscious mind. CHRIST (Soul) is the Mysterium
Coniunctionis of the psyche (ego-consciousness and the unconscious mind) via creatio
that is the salvation of the Soul. This diagram is merely a snap-shot of sorts of this overall
psychic process, which includes the whole of the mirage (fantasy) called the material world8.
7 The SELF, which Carl Jung calls CHRIST, is the SOUL in its pristine state as i t would be in the Garden of Eden: i .e.
Ves ica Piscis: thus, the SOUL is CHRIST; however, when the SOUL i s split into opposites (Adam receives Eve : i .e. ego-cons
ciousness dominating the unconscious mind), which it re ally ca n’t do other than in a fa nta s y a nd mythol ogi ca l
mode. This is why Chri st is a permanent fixture in the mythoi of Christianity for the soul can never lose i ts identi ty.
Chri s t in the mythoi of the psyche becomes the anima/animus, which is the main guiding principle in the psyche,
depending upon the gender of the initiate. There is actually nothing beyond the area of the cycle called CHRIST. Al l
el se beyond it is a mythological fantasy of the psyche and the material i s tic world. Here I am merely defining my
terminologies for the reader. In every sense the universe in its pristine state can be called Chri s t (Garden of Eden)
because in every sense it i s the sacred s criptures conveying the WORD OF GOD back to the psyche: unconscious mind
and ego-cons ciousnes s as one see him or hersel f in a mi rror.
8 If mos t people thought about i t they would realize that the material world does not exist. For example we look out
into the s tar-studded universe; however, i f those stars are l ight years away and it takes light years for the light to get
to the earth to tell humanity that they are there this means that period of time no longer exist being that time existed
in the past; therefore i f the s tar-studded universe is showing Earth its past then what is presently occupying the space
in the present time that those past stars once occupied? Yes, I understand that a good portion of those s ta rs s ti l l
exi s t; however, every so many billions of years s tars burn out and disintegrate an d are recycled back into new s ta rs .
Thi s latter portion of the so-called visual unive rse i s what I am drawing the re ader’s attention to. That space has to be
empty s imply because s tars cannot travel fifteen billion years s ince they do not las t that long; thus , the universe
cannot be expanding though the so-cal led vi sual ‘fa nta s y’ evidence negates that conclus ion. What are the
obs ervatories viewing if stars neither travel nor exist more than so many billions of years? I know that as tronomers
say that stars are recreated by exploding novas; however, that does not explain the absence of time lapse sequence
showing us the process as it is happening. It is like the evolutionists with their theory. They cannot demonstrate the
proces s or show evidence in fos s i l i l lus trating the proces s .
Al so in order for astronomers to say that l ight travels fifteen bi l l ion years to get to Earth to tel l humani ty the
uni ve rse is that old it had to ta ke the s tars themselves (seeing s tars don’t tra vel at the s peed of light), i f they exi s ted
that long, far longer than fifteen billions years to travel to a place in space that i s fi fteen bi l l ion l ight years away,
which would triple or quadruple or more the time it would take them to get to that space in l ight years from earth.
Accordi ng to Astronomy’s logic whole galaxies would have to tra vel a t the speed of l ight to get to the pos i ti ons the y
are presently in fifteen billion light years away, which of course is ludicrous in our present manner of unders tanding
the proces s .
Another problem is Seyfert Galaxies, this name is given to a galaxy that explodes and the effect of that explos ion
washes over the entire galaxy causing galactic-wide destruction. Why ha ve n’t we a re cord of our own i mme di a te
galaxy in a blazing light in these time lapse sequences the s ta r s tudded universe i s suppose to be showing the
5

Let me slightly recapitulate here. The center of the diagram above representing the
unknown God that neither can be classified nor diversified nor individualized; thus, it is merely a
theoretical postulate that positions the Universal Spiritual Law: God in the center of this
diagram, which symbolizes the center of the Soul. Christ (purple) is the spiritual union of Ego-consciousness
and the Unconscious Mind. Christ is the MONAD (Soul). In fact the MONAD is all
that exist in creation. All else in the creatio continua is a variation on the nature of Christ. Ego-consciousness
and the Unconscious Mind and the material world do not exist per se; rather,
they are projections: i.e. commentary on the MONAD: Christ the God/Man. The psyche: ego-consciousness
and the unconscious mind is another way of expressing the UNIVERSAL
MATHEMATICAL MATRIX. The material world is another expression of the psyche and the
Universal Mathematical Matrix. The psyche and the matrix and the world are different ways of
involuntarily expressing the same psychic concept.
When ego-consciousness branches off from the unconscious mind it dissociates itself from its
from its identification with the MONAD (Christ: i.e. Soul). This is the selfsame story as the
Prodigal Son9 that took his inheritance and went off into a far country. The Universal
Mathematical Matrix: Prima Material (Perennial Matrix) no longer exists when it is split in twain.
twain. In every sense this splitting of the psyche: ego-consciousness and the unconscious mind
mind in twain is the renting of the curtain in the Holy of Holies in the Temple of Jerusalem on
the night of Christ’s crucifixion10. All knowledge of the spiritual dynamic forces is forgotten. Ego-
Ego-consciousness, like the Prodigal Son, exist solely on its own merits, which amount to
basically nothing and this is why the Prodigal Son ended up taking care of the swine in order to
to make a living. The whole of the Judeao Christian Scripture is based solely upon the dynamic
dynamic conflict between ego-consciousness and the unconscious mind and/or their eventual
eventual harmonious spiritual union.
The Universal Mathematical Matrix: Prima Materia (Perennial Matrix), which is the 10 x 10
10 square (commentary on the MONAD: God/Man Christ) mentioned above is the original
foundational source of Astrology. Astrology is not an invention of man; rather, it is the symbolic
symbolic representation of the vision from God, which educates the SOUL from out of Chaos
into Order. Astrology can be said, unequivocally, to be the cause excellence for birthing the
Eucharist for by parking of it Christ is birthed to the soul allowing it (SOUL) to be born again.
This in fact would be the annunciation: i.e. Gabriel visitation to Mary (psyche: i.e. the agreed
upon cooperation of the unconscious mind and ego-consciousness. The psyche is the WATERS OF LIFE:
obs ervatories around the world? Scientists know that our immediate galaxy when through this proces s ; thus , there
s houl d be vi s ua l re cord of i t i n our ‘ti me -l a ps e uni ve rs e ’.
Then there is the mystery of DARKNESS in the universe, which has never been answered; however, that problem
has been studied for thousands of years. What thi s enta i l s i s that with a universe of infinite s ta rs completely
surrounding Earth (similar to a Dyson sphere ) each star shining in al l di rections 360° the universe should be in a
blazing light [see: DARKNESS AT NIGHT: A Riddle of the Universe (1987), by Edward Harrison, publ i shed by Harvard
University Press]; yet, darkness is seen throughout the universe. These anomal ies in the equations of As tronomy
show humanity how much i t does not know about the material universe. The answer to our universe being in
DARKNESS i s of course that each individual i s viewing the inner core of hi s or her own psyche by s tudying the
projection of it: i .e. the outer world that is s tructure very much l ike the Ves ica Pi s ci s , which i s symbol ical ly hal f
spi ritual (l ight) and hal f material (darknes s ).
9 Luke 15:11-32
10 Matthew 27: 50-54;
6

i .e. ego-conscious ne s s a nd the uncons ci ous mi nd. The word ‘MARY’ i s de fi ne d a s ‘a qua = wa ter’. ): i.e.
conception of the Christ Child.
However, since ego-consciousness is in total and absolute opposition to the unconscious
mind prior to the gift of the vision from God the Father the material world, symbolically ego-consciousness,
7
does battle with the
Anima/Animus (unconscious mind): the
psyche symbolically represents the false
zodiacal cycle. It is this eternal conflict
through the conflicting gyrating forces of the
opposites that processes THE CYCLES OF
DIVINE CREATION. As long as ego-consciousness
is in control of the psyche the
negative forces symbolically represented by
the Calendar Year will dominate the scene
forcing itself to live in a Hell on Earth of its
own making; whereas, when ego-consciousness
cooperates with the
unconscious mind the positive forces
symbolically represented by the spiritual
zodiacal cycle that governs the scene by
allowing the SOUL to enter into the Garden of
Eden birthing the Christ Child.
Let me clarify a point here. The soul is not
the psyche. The soul is what lives in the
Garden of Eden; however, if the soul is tossed
out of the Garden of Eden it becomes the
psyche: ego-consciousness and the
unconscious mind at war with each other.
There can be no male (ego-consciousness =
Sun) or female (unconscious mind = Moon) in
Christ.
This article is a commentary on the first
four chapters of Genesis, which will introduce
a system of cycles, which I call THE CYCLES OF
DIVINE CREATION that comes directly from
the first two chapters of Genesis. There are
only eleven cycles that I will be discussing, which literally construct the Scales of Libra giving the
soul a choice between the so-called Scale of Light (spirituality) and the Scale of Darkness
(materialism). There is inherently a much larger system of fifteen hundred and eighty -four
(1584) cycles, which these eleven cycles are intuited. It would seem that our materialistic realm
only deals with just these eleven cycles (Number Seven in Sector #711): this brings to mind
Christ’s statement, “In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told
11 I may well be, and probably am, wrong about this. The other fifteen-hundred and seven-three cycles may wel l
re pre sent other aspects of the sacre d scriptures or another culture’s religious texts that I am not privy to. In no way
am I say I am the end all and be all of this research. Other wi l l come after me and add to what I have achieved.

you. I go to prepare a place for you (KJV John 14:2)”. The first four chapters of Genesis, as a
whole, symbolically introduces the Zodiac/Calendar year. These two sets of cycles: i.e. THE
CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION and the ZODIAC/CALENDAR YEAR complement each other. The
Cycles of Divine Creation are split into two parts creating the scales of Light and Darkness. Here
the sacred scriptures are openly declaring that the soul has a free will to choose which one it
wants. As it will be shown in the main body of this article these cycles comes about through
contrasting the Zodiac Cycles and the Calendar Cycles by distinguishing the Triplicities
(elements): i.e. Fire, Earth, Air and Water signs used in the Cycle of Light from the
Quadruplicities: i.e. Cardinal, Fixed and Mutable signs used to illustrate the Cycle of Darkness.
These sets of cycles seemingly comes out of nothing (Ex Nihilo) literally illustrating that the
sacred scriptures has an all together different message from out of the WORD OF GOD than
what is written out in the surface storyline. The manner in which the WORD OF GOD is written
and structured into the Judeao Christian Scriptures is on a totally scientific basis and if it was not
for this precision esoteric (hidden) science involve in its creation I could never have had a
lifetime of researching the true WORD OF GOD as it truly was meant to be studied.
The entire bible speaks to the vision that the soul is graced with from God. The first four
chapters of Genesis have Virgo offering up the Scales of Libra to the soul. Here the
Anima/Animus (Elohym/Moon), the feminine aspect of the deity, is offering up the Scales of
Libra to the ego-centric god: i.e. ego-consciousness (Yahweh/Sun) or vice versa. Virgo is of
course symbolized by Mercury’s Caduceus, which has upon its staff two serpents. This i s why
many depictions of the Garden of Eden in art shows two serpents (Yahweh and Elohym: i.e.
Adam and Eve are their angels) wrapped around the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
When reading the texts of the first four chapters of Genesis all of thi s sound like pure
fantasy; however, when the symbols and alphanumeric letters/words of the sacred scriptures
are broken down into their constituent components all of this above becomes very apparent.
Creation is a psycho-spiritual/physical reality (Garden of Eden), which is formed by way of
the four basic elements: i.e. Fire, Earth, Air and Water via their perpetual Mysterium
Coniunctionis. The soul is meant to live in this pristine psycho-spiritual/physical reality: Garden
of Eden; however, the soul in quest to create its own conception of reality goes astray of this
non-progressive psycho-spiritual/physical reality into a self made time/space continuum
through the misuse of the Triplicities (elements): i.e. four nuclear forces by way of the
Quadruplicities: i.e. past (Cardinal), present (Fixed) and future (Mutable) classifications to create
its own ego-centric psycho-physical reality.
This above is not to say the psycho-spiritual/physical12 reality (Garden of Eden) is not subject
to the time/space continuum, which it is of course. The psycho-spiritual/physical reality is
subject to the same slow and/or rapid changes inherent in the dynamics forces of the cosmos;
rather, what I am saying is that the soul in becoming dissatisfied with its spiritual surrounding,
for whatever reason, and is not content with what it has in life decides to bring about a change
it is cast out into the psycho-physical reality. The soul in wanting to change those undesirable
and unacceptable conditions becomes discontent and goes astray of the Garden of Eden psycho-
12 Thi s psycho-spiritual/physical reality is the Garden of Eden (Vesica Piscis) not the psychophysical reality that some
are naming as an unseen reality. The psychophysical reality i s the physical world the psyche is presently experiencing
via ego-cons ciousnes s .
8

spiritual/physical reality that is its original birthright and is self-exiled into a terrestrial creation
of its own making; hence, Virgo gifting the Scales of Libra to the soul.
Essentially, the psycho-spiritual/physical reality (Garden of Eden) is life in the material world
that enables the soul to live contently with what one has; rather, than trying to progress into an
ego-driven infinite realm of changes where there is no psychic stability whatsoever.
It is difficult for the uninitiate to understand that every single initiate creates his own reality.
No two human beings live in the same materialistic or spiritual reality; though, the senses
project a different set of concepts that would negate that idea. The only hope the individual has
in achieving a contented life in the outer reality is to create a personal Garden of Eden (Temple
of God) and that will not happen unless the initiate turns his or her life over to the care of God.
It is difficult for the individual to realize that he or she lives in the desert of one’s own mind:
the wilderness of the mind of man. Each of us thirsts for a contented life and like the nomad
trying to cross the vastness of the desert desperately seeking the water of life he or she will
create psychically his or her own mirage: oasis in that desert and it will solely depend upon the
initiate’s hubris as to whether he or she will submit to the love of God.
In every sense THE CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION: the Scales of Libra are derived from THE
UNIVERSAL MATHEMATICAL MATRIX or is that vice versa? As this paper continues the old
idea of Squaring the Circle is going to come to mind. The rows and columns of the matrix are
all in cycles; nonetheless, ego-consciousness in harmony with the unconscious mind
envisages them collectively as being in unanimity a four square image not a sphere; thus, the
CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION were probably derived from the UNIVERSAL MATHEMATICAL
MATRIX; however, at least, from my perspective, understanding the matrix squares the
circle: i.e. brings Order out of Chaos, which is another way of saying “Squaring the Circle”.
This article concerns my own interaction with the Holy Spirit, who led me, in the past
forty years, through a whirlwind of exhilarating discoveries by means of a serendipitous
journey by way of the mind of Christ.
9

PROLOGUE
Returning to my Spiritual Roots
The Cycles of Divine Creation that this article is about to elucidate, was, in the forty-years of
researching the esotericism that is intrinsically codified to the literature, artworks and
monuments of antiquity through the auspices of the ancient scribes, my first and foremost
mystical insight13 into spirituality and mysticism.
It should be understood right from the start of this work that when I first envisaged a cycle
from out of the texts of the first chapter of Genesis it archetypally ceased my waking
consciousness and caused a divine obsession to come over me14. I could not, even if I wanted
to, let it go; though, I was continuously warned, by my peers at the time, to do so and to get out
of the book of Genesis altogether when I, through my inexperience, tried to explain what it was I
was envisaging out of the Genesis Creation Account.
Over the years I have refrained from writing too explicitly about these cycles; though, I have
touched on them slightly here and there in my previous writings15. I have hesitated over the
years to expound upon these Cycles of Divine Creation, in a more comprehensible manner;
because, there were complexities about them that I had visualized, which I knew that I would
not be able to do justice too. In the beginning, I was too inexperienced and had not the
seasoned research experience and insights into the literature, artworks and monuments of the
world that these past forty-years have prepared me for.
I actually can say that that kernel of an idea concerning the first cycle, I envisaged from out of
the texts of the first chapter of Genesis, is, for all intent and purpose, the foundation of all of my
later researches and my writings about them. This latter I say from hindsight. When I was
actually researching all the other materials beyond the initial period of the cycles I had no idea
that it would all relate inherently back to the Cycles of Divine Creation.
In the truest sense I am coming full circle, back to those halcyon days, when I was just a
fledgling neophyte in relationship to what the first chapter of Genesis was all about; though, I
never really left researching the texts of the first chapter of Genesis; albeit, I kept researching
these chapters from totally different perspectives than the cycles, and I will be, more or less,
going back over that research tersely illustrating from whence it all hailed.
The research I conducted on the first four chapters of Genesis after the first six years
(January 1977 – April 15, 1983) is incredible especially when it is realized that I barely touched
on the Cycles of Divine Creation since then. There were so much more additional materials that
13 Thi s took place in January 1977
14 I say this from hindsight not from initially experiencing i t.
15 THE SECRETS and THE MYSTERIES OF GENESIS: Anti qui ty’s Ha l l of Records
http://www.amazon.com/The-Secrets -Mys teries -Genes i s -
Antiqui tys /dp/1412010128/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8andqid=1406050253ands r=8-
2andkeywords=the+secrets+and+the+mys teries+of+genes i s and
THE SISTINE CHAPEL: A Study in Celestial Cartography, The Mys teries and the Esoteric Teachings of the Cathol ic
Church
http://www.amazon.com/The-Sistine-Chapel-Celestial-
Cartography/dp/1479749486/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8andqid=1406050410andsr=8-
1andkeywords=THE+SISTINE+CHAPEL+A+STUDY+IN+CELESTIAL+CARTOGRAPHY
10

I was uncovering esoterically out of the Genesis tests and in other religious literature, artworks
and monuments that they collectively overshadowed anything having to do with the cycles.
Only those initiates that can grasp the esoteric complexities of the sacred scriptures can truly
realize that the entire Old and New Testaments can be symbolically read out of the first chapter
of Genesis16 showing it is all interrelated very much like a holographic image; however, in the
beginning I did not foresee all those nuances. Back in those untroubled days I merely had a nine
part cycle, which was just the kernel of an idea, which became such an obsession that it
dominated and unnerved my waking consciousness. Who would have believed my report?
As the decades rolled by, since April 1983, I came to understand that Astrology was the
innermost mystical paradigm of the spiritual creation. Personally, I do not research Astrology
via the medium of horoscopes. I do not envisage Astrology as a prognosticating tool. Fortune
Telling is absolute non-sense and paganism to my sense of what the WORD OF GOD is all about.
Yes, Astrology is basically given birth via the mathematical sciences; however, seeing
mathematics is a predictive tool only in that sense is Astrology a prognosticating tool. Astrology
is more of a symbolic and alphanumeric tool, which aids in the unraveling of the mythological
stories that goes with the culture it is associated with; thus, Astrology is at once both a
mathematical (Quadruvium) and a grammatical (Trivium) tool: Seven Liberal Arts integrated17 as
one Esoteric Science enabling the initiate to bring forth the Eucharist18: i.e. The Transcendent
Function19. Without this mystical alchemical marriage of the opposites the spiritual vision that
the initiate is entitled to by virtue of his or her birthright can never come upon the soul of the
individual. This visitation (vision) is beautifully narrated in the New Testament when Mary the
mother of Christ was grace by a visit from Gabriel and overshadowed by the Holy Spirit. Christ is
this mystical vision (Eucharist) that comes upon the soul/psyche (Mary) when it DESIRES to
know God the Father above all other considerations in its existence (life).
The sacred scriptures of the world are not just the written texts of the major religions. The
concept ‘sacred scriptures: i.e. WORD OF GOD’ are symbolically represented via literature,
artworks, monuments, nature and the activities of all organic life on earth and the courses of
the stars, planets, moons, asteroids, comets, etc., etc. Most important the sacred scriptures are
contained within the psychic activity of every single human being, which is exuded through
every thought, word and deed of the individual including dreams and hallucinations. The
Esoteric Science codified to the literature, artworks and monuments of antiquity were
scientifically envisaged by the ancient sages guided by the MONAD: God/Man Christ via sacred
geometry; whereas, all other materialistic-venues for the WORD OF GOD: i.e. sacred scriptures,
16 Actually, the entire Old and New Testaments are a commentary on the first letter of Genesis: BETH.
17 The Seven Liberal Arts are codified to the ancient arts; however, only the grammatical aspect is overtly present for
the uninitiated’s consideration. The othe r s i x l i be ra l a rts a re hi dde n ove rtl y wi thi n the e s oteri ci s m of s a cre d
geometry, which is available only to the initiate. Any subsequent translation of the immediate artwork (indigenous
language) des troys the abs tractnes s of the Esoteric Science held within i ts precincts .
18 The Euchari s t of the Cathol ic Church
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Euchari s t_in_the_Cathol ic_Church
19 The Psychology of the Transference
http://www.amazon.com/The-Psychology-Transference-C-Jung/
dp/0691017522/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8andqid=1406072573andsr=8-
11
1andkeywords=the+psychology+of+the+transference

such as translations20 of the spiritual texts into vernaculars other than the original languages, are
not objective; rather, they are totally subjective and personal points of view. In every sense
they (false prophecies) are only fit for the fire.
This article analyzes the first four chapters of Genesis to unravel two diametrically different
sets of cycles associated to Astrology. The Scales of Libra, which represent the Cycles
(transubstantiating into the Scales of Libra) of Light and Darkness and the second set of cycles
represent the Zodiac/Calendar Year: in every sense the Cycles of Divine Creation (Scales of Libra)
are the Zodiac signs and the Calendar months. Both these sets of cycles come together in
unanimity of purpose to elucidate the spiritual vision (annunciation) that the soul/psyche, that
deserves it, is graced with. In fact the elucidation of this spiritual vision to the soul/psyche is all
the sacred scriptures of the world were created to convey.
The sacred scriptures of the world have nothing to convey to the initiate other than to give
it knowledge of the vision21 that its soul/psyche has been graced with. There is absolutely
nothing on the face of the earth or in the skies above or beneath the depths of the seas that is of
more significance for the soul/psyche to busy itself about.
20 Translations are alright, insofar, as they deal with the bas ic mythological s toryl ine; however, from a spi ritual
perspective translations are ambiguous and of little importance without a comprehens ive unders tanding of the
indigenous language’s alphanumeric and symbol ic s tructure . Without that esoteric knowledge, as the sole
foundation for researching the sacred s criptures, there can be no spiritual contemplative study of any trans lation of
an indigenous language used to s cribe the Word of God.
21 It’s a harsh reality to learn that the sacred scriptures are not for the masses per se; rather, the y were created solely
for those that have had the vi sion; nonetheless, the sacred s criptures can incite an inner DESIRE in the heart of the
individual to know God, which may and probably will generate the spiritual vision i f i t’s a true a nd hone s t DESIRE.
12

For years now I did not believe I would be able to, in this life time, revisit these Cycles of
Divine Creation; though, I had a great deal of it already researched. For me it was all about
putting it to some kind of context. As I look back over the vista of my spiritual quest, spanning
forty-year, and the esoteric discoveries I have made, from out of the literature, artworks and
monuments of antiquity, I realized that that initial kernel of an idea concerning the first cycle I
envisaged out of the first chapter of Genesis is what funnel all that other research into my
psyche. The first two and a half years of my groping into the sacred scriptures from the
beginning of August 1974 to January 1977, I would say, led me to that eureka moment when I
envisaged that first cycle.
This spiritual research I have been pioneering is an entirely new discipline of thought, at
least from modernity’s perspective; though, it is as ancient as the dawn of the time/space
continuum itself. Instinctively, I knew I could not leave this world without leaving a record of
the cycles behind no matter what my conscious thoughts may have been. I am so very grateful
to God that he has given me the strength and mental acuity that has enabled me to complete
my raison d’être: reason for existence, in this lifetime.
13

INTRODUCTION
THE RAPTURE22
From my vantage point, as one knowing the Word of God and its origins23, I realize that it
will be extremely difficult for modernity to accept the fact that Astrology played the dominating
role in structuring the Word of God to the mythoi of the world’s religious literature, artworks
and monuments seeing that Astrology has been so maligned; at least, throughout all the years
of my life. In addition it will be inconceivable to academia and the numerous religious
communities, around the world, that the Word of God can be known definitively and codified
esoterically as an exact science for all future generations to benefit from. This idea that the root
sources of the Word of God can be known scientifically is beyond belief for it goes against the
prevailing theories of every religious community on Earth. The prevailing theory has God
choosing one person over all his children, on the face of the earth, and gives that so-called
prophet the responsibility of educating the world as to what His message is. This is about ‘as far
from the truth as a sow is from the moon24’. The MONAD: God/Man Christ gives each individual
the same message and it is the responsibility of the individual, no matter where he or she is in
the world, to discern it and to act upon it. This places the onus of the initiate’s spiritual
education upon him or herself.
The soul neither individually nor collectively has any intelligence of its own. All knowledge
is given to the soul via the auspices of the MONAD: God/Man Christ. The psyche creativity
comes only from that reservoir of knowledge without restrictions. The soul enters and leaves
the psychic illusion of the space/time continuum tabula rasa (blank slate) regardless of what the
scientists may think they know to the contrary. This is similar to a fish existing in water. Outside
the water the fish cannot breathe. Without the presents of the MONAD: God/Man Christ ego-consciousness
could not possibly have a thought in his or her head. The outer materialistic
world needs space for there to be time or an object to be placed into motion, plant life needs
sunlight to blossom, life on earth needs air to breath, what makes man think that he can have a
thought in his head without existing in the realm of the MONAD: God/Man Christ? There is no
time/space continuum outside of the psyche dreaming it into existence. The Soul, literally,
exists within the confines of the MONAD: God/Man Christ and there is no escaping those divine
precincts.
The Cycles of Divine Creation seemingly comes out of nothing (ex nihilo) because what
comes from out of them is not something new under the face of the sun; rather, it is new to the
individual/initiate receiving the spiritual vision from the MONAD: God/Man Christ. This raison
d’être allows the individual to experience the same old world via more magnificent and
22 Matthew 24:35-44; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Rapture the word RAPTURE i s not actual ly used in the New
Te s ta me nt. It i s a mode rn word us e to ca l l to mi nd thi s pa rti cul a r a s pe ct of Je s us ’ tea chi ngs .
23 Al l my wri tings: i.e. books and papers are about explaining the root source of how the Word of God came into
phys ical mani fes ta tion: l iterature, artworks and monuments : i .e. the Body and Blood of Chri s t.
24 Thi s cute remark is phrasing an old Native American Indian maxim.
14

spectacular intellectual and sensual experiences. The individual’s environment goes from being
ego-consciousness’ (Yahweh’s) dung-heap (Hell) to an unrealized paradise (new creation: i.e.
Garden of Eden). The receiver of such a gift25 realizes he or she has actually psychically died and
has gone to heaven. This is what the serpent in the Garden of Eden was talking to Eve about,
“you shalt not surely die”. Yes, of course Yahweh (ego-consciousness) is going to banish those
that convert to the Kundalini Serpent into what it considers the desert. That desert is the
Promise Land. It is the land of opportunity to bring forth a new creation by building one’s own
oasis in the outer darkness. That is what the Garden of Eden is, a personal oasis in the
emptiness of the material existence. It is a one-on-one relationship to God the Father (Universal
Spiritual Impersonal Law: i.e. an Empyrean of Love).
The MONAD: God/Man Christ gives the individual a new raison d’être (reason for existence)
allowing him or her to live life more abundantly (John 10:10). The sacred scriptures of the world
are only for those individuals that have received the spiritual vision directly from the MONAD:
God; thus, it is only those individuals that have the mental acuity to appreciate intui tively the
esotericism codified to the mythoi of the literature, artworks and monuments of the world. The
Word of God is not for those that have not received the spiritual vision from the MONAD:
God/Man Christ, which unfortunately comprises the vast majority of the race. This is not to say,
of course, that the uninitiate cannot receive the spiritual vision from the MONAD: God/Man
Christ if he or she persevere and truly DESIRE to know God the Father (Universal Spiritual
Impersonal Law: i.e. an Empyrean of Love).
How do I tell you the reader that Yahweh, in the Old Testament, is the adversary on one
hand and Christ in the New Testament on the other? When Yahweh (Sun = Ego-consciousness)
cooperates: i.e. has dialogue with the angels (Elohym = Moon = Unconscious Mind) he becomes
King of the Angels: i.e. Christ. This is why so-called symbolists get it all wrong when they
interpret the teachings of Christianity as sun worship. Yes, ego-consciousness represents sun
worship when the Reformation Age and the Age of Enlightenment, cast religion out with the
bathwater, while at the same time they worshipped REASON as the peak of human intellect.
REASON from that perspective is sun-worship; whereas, when coupling reason with the whole
of creatio continua is the worship of God the Father. Think about that contrast for a minute.
Symbolically, the Earth represents the Soul. Worshipping the Sun (Yahweh) is the Earth circling
(worshipping) a dot (sun) in the immediate solar system in exclusion to infinite creatio conti nua
(symbolically the vast universe); whereas, the Moon represent the thirteen signs representing
the Moon Calendar Year: twelve signs of the Zodiac (the whole of the spiritual creatio continua),
which the Earth is at its center (Earth the soul is a symbol of the MONAD: Christ: i.e. God/Man).
We have all read and/or have heard the stories of how in ancient times God or some
human hero descended into the underworld of Hades to retrieve the deserving soul or a loved
one. Dante Alighieri’s26 La Divina Commedia27 speaks of his journey through the three realms of
spirit until he experience his rapturous vision of the Trinity; then, he came back to write of his
psychic experiences. This is the RAPTURE that the New Testament symbolically speaks of : “Then
shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. Two women shall be grinding at the
mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left (Matthew 24: 40-41)”. This is the spiritual vision that
25 I l ike giving the analogy of a swarm of flies hovering over dung. Flies obtain their life nouri shment from what we
humans cal l fi lth; yet, fl ies l ive out thei r enti re l ives in that domain of fi lth.
26 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dante_Alighieri
27 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Divina_Commedia
15

the individual is graced with that takes him or her out of the depths of the personal hell he or
she is living in and revitalizes that individual’s psyche as if he or she was a new born baby just
experiencing the world for the first time; however, this time that individual receiving the
spiritual vision has a newfound intuitive mental acuity coupled with a lifetime of experiences
behind him or her as guides as to what to expect in the world; whereas, the new born baby has
not that advantage in the life he or she is about to experience. How often has each of us desired
to be young again with the knowledge we now possess? This spiritual vision given to the
individual by the MONAD: God/Man Christ literally personifies that DESIRE in a real time
experience.
The first chapter of Genesis is a very intriguing document on many levels. Its first two
verses, for all intent and purpose, did not appear to me realistically, from the period of August
1974 to January 1977, to have any particular usefulness that I could envisage. These verses
initially seemed, at least from my viewpoint, to be a redundancy on the body of the first chapter
of Genesis before the author even begins to narrate the creation account. These first two
verses of the Torah appeared to me, initially, to be an insertion into the texts by a later scri be.
These were the initial years that first brought my attention to a serious study of the Judeao
Christian Scriptures. I was a fledgling student of the text at the time and my ignorance was vast
concerning all aspects of theology, doctrine, the history of the text, and even what the text
contained in its storyline. I really had not read the Bible up to that time from cover to cover.
Like most so-called Christians I rarely went to church and when I did the proceedings were
baffling. That which I knew concerning the content of the sacred scriptures came, for the most
part, from the pulpit and Sunday school classes in my adolescence years. I had read portions of
the text in my late teens and as a young adult in Viet Nam but nothing that amounted to
anything. I can say; however, that my religious education in Parochial School, up to the fifth
grade of grammar school, would serve me well when I did get serious about studying the sacred
scriptures. The nuns in Parochial School taught the Bible and Catechism through lectures and by
oral examinations. After all I had been Baptized, Confirmed, and received my First Holy
Communion before I had finished the fifth grade. If you are a Catholic you will know just how
much of the Catechism you must memorize in order to achieve that feat; yet, I personally had
not read the Bible or the Catholic Catechism until many years after those events. When I finally
did read the Old and New Testaments for myself, from cover to cover, I was literally appalled by
its contents. As time went by and I began to meditate on the text, slowly but surely, it gave up
its secrets. I can truthfully say that I am a lucky man to have realized a non-Protestant outlook
on religion because it was the scarcity of my religious education that prepared me for a lifetime
of non-academic interference. Being forced as a child to read and grasp the ruthless and
barbaric stories of the Old Testament literally takes innocence from an individual’s childhood.
Though I am not a Catholic defender the Church at least gives the child the bare essential of
Christianity and then allows the child to be a child or at least this is how I remember my
experiences of the Church in the late 50’s and early 60’s.
In the beginning of my quest understanding of the sacred scriptures came at a snail’s pace.
As I persevered in my research the text of the sacred scriptures began to reveal themselves, in
their true form, in proportion to the sincerity of my studies. I have learned that such
determination and DESIRE, to truly know God the Father, is the only prayer that God the Father
can realistically answer.
16

CHAPTER ONE
FIRST INKLINGS OF THE SACRED SCRIPTURES
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FROM A SCIENTIFIC BASIS
It was a combination of articles and theological ideas that caused me to search the sacred
scriptures as if words had numbers, color28 and symbolic values that interrelated with each
other. My researches went on like that for a long time with little or no progress. I was
eventually very successful in making all three relationships with some of the words of the sacred
scriptures through the King James Version of the bible and this would be without any reference
works whatsoever; however, my greatest success would be in arithmetical data via sacred
geometry. That would not come about until after the first two decades of biblical research. I
believed that the text of the sacred scriptures, without evidence or sane reasoning, was a
comprehensive schema; whereby, all its parts, whether it was the analysis of words in a chapter,
a group of chapters, or the entire Old and New Testaments as a whole were interrelate with
each other as if they were in a grand symphony. This initial insight was a gut feeling based more
on numerous conversations with various individuals29 I have met over the span of my lifetime up
to that time rather than any other method or thought process that I may have had on the
subject. This is certainly not a scientific method in which to pursue such a matter but
nonetheless that is the way it was.
SAINT AUGUSTINE’S CONFESSIONS
There are many early Christian mystics and saints, not to forget to mention the Jewish
mystics, that have written on the sacred scriptures leaving behind some very obscure, terse, and
cryptic remarks that defies the logic of our twentieth and twenty-first century culture and
28 THE TARGUMS OF PALESTINE: commonly entitled, The Targums of Jonathan Ben Uzziel , on the BOOK OF GENESIS
(see Genesis Chapter Three: “And the eyes of both were enlightened, and they knew that they were naked, divested of
the purple robe in which they had been created”.). I had once hypothesized, before reading thi s that when Adam
(red) and Eve (blue) l eft the Garden of Eden they disrobed a purple garment. You could imagine my as toni shment
many years later when I read the Jewish Targums, which confirmed my fledgling attempts at scriptural theology. My
premi se in this area is that the male, in the form of clothing, puts on the female representing blue in order to create
the Adamic personality, which represents the color purple. So when Adam was split into man and woman he went
from the color purple to the colors red and blue; thus, Adam and Eve disrobed a purple garment. In fact we tend to
think of boys and men as wearing blue and girls and women wearing pink or red. Women, which represent blue ,
dres s up in pink and red (putting on the male) in order to become the Adamic personal i ty. Thi s i s a commonplace
paradox, which i s never ever ta lked about in our everyday affai rs or within the cultural mores .
29 I remember clearly an incident in my early teens when in speaking to a senior ci ti zen, he told me that the enti re
bible was encapsulated into the fi rs t letter of Genes i s and that the enti re Old and New Tes taments were
commentaries on it. Of course at the time I could not fathom what he was talking about; yet, when I was deep into
my own researches that conversation came to mind. It would take me almost into my late forties to envisage what he
was ta lking about.
17

thought processes. As students we are taught to believe in one train of thought taught by
contemporary educators; yet, when reading the religious writings of people that were closer to
the spiritual source, so to speak, we are being given a different way of thinking. It is
exasperating, to say the least, that our religious educators would fail to give us a truer account
and/or sense of what the early Jews and Christians actually knew and believed. It is of course
possible and most probable that such cryptic remarks were just as baffling to them as they are
to the fledgling initiate today.
It was Saint Augustine that put me on to one of the great mysteries of the first chapter of
Genesis (December/January 1976/1977) when he began to talk about God creating hell before
he created the Heavens and the Earth. What could possibly exist before the first word of
Genesis? Why would Saint Augustine, or anybody else for that matter, talk about that which
could not possibly be known? He was inferring that something took place before creation
began. I believed this to be presumptuousness, on his part, when I first read Saint Augustine’s
Confessions30 but I would come to regret that thought process as time went by.
“My answer to those who ask ‘what was God doing before he made the heaven and earth?’ is
not ‘He was preparing Hell for people who pry into mysteries’. This frivolous retort has been
made before now, so we are told, in order to evade the point of the question. But it is one thing
to make fun of the questioner and another to find the answer. So I shall refrain from giving this
reply. For in matters of which I am ignorant I would rather admit the fact than gain credit by
giving the wrong answer and making a laughing-stock of a man who asks a serious question.
Instead of this I will say that you, my God, are the Creator of all creation, and if we mean the
whole of creation when we speak of heaven and earth, I unreservedly say that before he made
heaven and earth, God made nothing.”
Saint Augustine is being deliberately secretive here on a number of points in this
statement. FIRST he points out that there were others that had made the remark prior to his
comments. That is important to know that such remarks were bandied around a bit in those
days. The SECOND point is that he distinctly points out that the answer can be known “it is
one thing to make fun of the questioner and another to find the answer”. The THIRD is that
Augustine says, “God made nothing”, which is a play on words for Catholics. There is not a
Catholic worth his or her salt if he or she had not heard a nun say, “An idled mind is the devil’s
workshop”. In other words these two phrases, ‘made nothing” and ‘preparing Hell” is
synonymous. Is Saint Augustine just being more polite in his remarks then his predecessors?
No, I think he is being more esoteric. The FOURTH point in this statement and probably the
most important is that he quotes his predecessors correctly word for word and most likely it is
the reason that this chapter was added to his Confessions: “He was preparing Hell for people
that pry into mysteries.” The average person reading this chapter, on Saint Augustine’s
Confessions, in contemporary times, would take the word “mysteries” to means something that
was not known and needed to be searched out or that it could only be known by the spiritually
gifted. It certainly means all that but also in Saint Augustine’s time the word “mysteries”
pointed to the Mystery Schools. Contemporary religious educators would take the word
mysteries in the context that it appears to have been written, to mean that these were
forbidden and useless speculations, or a brainteaser. This statement would appear to have an
30 SAINT AUGUSTINE: CONFESSION, trans lated by R. S. Pine -Coffin (Book XI Chapter 12)
18

implied threat of speculators going to Hell, attached to it, for those that misinterpret it ;
however, I believe that this latter part of the statement was meant for those initiates in the
Mystery Schools more as an encouragement; rather, than anything else.
In using the word ‘mysteries’ Saint Augustine was indeed speaking to the initiates of the
ancient Mystery Schools; however, I did not realize this interpretation of Saint Augustine’s
words until many years later. God only speaks to those that have entered into his mysteries. In
fact the Catholic Church is a mystical Mystery School in its own right and has replace the
Eleusinian and Mithras Mysteries that hailed from ancient Greece and Rome.
This was a very informative statement made by an ancient Christian educator, saint, and
mystic. This statement explains, in terse remarks, that something does exist prior to the first
word of Genesis and that the initiate had the means to ferret out what it was. It was very
obvious, from these statements, that the so-called saints and mystics did not have a monopoly
on the interpretation of the sacred scriptures. I remember years before reading that the Early
Christian Fathers31 dreaded the fact that “even the sinner can write a gospel”. Can you, the
reader, fathom the depth of that statement? It means that the initiate has at his disposal not
only the resources to become knowledgeable in the spiritual Word of God but he also has the
resources to obtain the ability to write a recognized canonized version of the gospels. That was
an extraordinary idea/revelation. It meant that the initiate had the means by which to know the
foundational source of the WORD OF GOD, which is an extraordinary insight and hope for all
humanity.
THE CYCLE OF DIVINE CREATION
As my studied continued, I learned that the Hebrew word “bara”, which is translated into
English as “created” also has definitions such as “choose, select, and separate”. This threw, at
least in my fledgling researches, the whole concept of creation ‘ex nihilo: out-of-nothing’
(meaning no prior material existence) right out the theological window. Yes, material creation is
made out of ‘nothing’ if we define materialism as ‘nothing’ and spirituality as the onl y
substance32. Such theological statements are paradoxical because only a spiritually minded
person would see that the material world was nothing: being a mirage of the mind. But have a
materialist read that same theological statement he or she would actually believe that no
material thing existed prior to God the Father creating the heavens and the earth. He could
never envisage that every moment constitutes a new beginning: BERESHITH, whereas God the
Father is continuously creating (creatio continua) the same nanosecond over and over again. As
humans we tend to take an infinitesimal part of a moment in creation and chase after it as if it
was all there was totally oblivious of everything outside the boundaries of our tunnel vision.
God the Father permeates each infinitesimal part of creation with infinite creative ideas.
The Dogon Tribes in Africa define the words “amma Bara” as “god helps.33” The first verse
of Genesis can be translated “In the beginning God ‘separated’ the Heavens and the Earth”. It is
31 Early Church Fathers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Fathers
32 It was in December/January 1976/1977 that I began to read the works of Mary Baker Eddy the Di s covery and
Founder of Christian Science Metaphysics and it was her teachings that raised my level of cons ciousnes s to a more
spi ritual understanding of God the Father (unknown God). SCIENCE AND HEALTH, with Key to the Scriptures, by Mary
Baker Eddy
33 THE SIRIUS MYSTERY, by Robert Temple, (pg. 318)
19

interesting that this tribe in Africa relates this phase to the dawn of the time/space continuum
as the Genesis text does. How could this African tribe have obtained the same nuance, using
the same words, in the appropriate context? It is believed that this tribe obtained much, if not
all, of its cultural belief system via the Egyptian civilization. This would be in line with my own
thought since I believe that it was the Egyptian civilization and other Gentile nations that
collectively wrote the Hebrew Torah and we will get into that theme further at the appropriate
time. The Dogon tribe’s entire religious mythology revolves around the star Sirius, which in
Egyptian religious cosmology is related to Isis the consort of Osiris whom constellation is Orion.
Two of the Great Pyramid’s so-called star-shafts are orientated to these two star systems.34 I
found it quite fascinating that “the latest estimate of the ratio of the masses of our sun and
Sirius A is 2.14.”35 Intriguing because the numerical value of the letter BETH, which is the first
letter of the Torah, is 412, which is the reverse of 2.14 dropping the decimal. The Judeao
Christian Scriptures makes such plays on numbers in words, in both the Hebrew and Greek texts,
via the ancient art of Gematria as long as the digits are the same. Even when the numerical
digits are not the same but the total numerical values of their letters are equivalent to other
Hebrew word’s numerical values then two or more words would be considered related in some
way in the art of Gematria.
This above concerning the word BARA has a ring of truth to it in light of what the second
verse of Genesis says. It is as if the first verse represented some kind of deliberate order being
put into place, whereas, the second verse offered up chaos as an alternative to the first verse.
As the initiate reads the Old and New Testaments he or she will recognize that the number eight
deals with circumcision and the number nine deals with death. Now the first verse of Genesis
says after the initial word: Bereshith, “God separated the Heavens and the Earth”, which
conforms to the concept of circumcision. The second verse of Genesis is a very bleak picture of
“the Spirit of God hovering (moving and/or brooding) over the face of the waters” and this verse
reminded me of Jesus Christ on the cross dying on the ninth hour. Christ dying on the cross with
his hands stretched out and his last seven-statements gives a vivid and very graphic picture of
“the spirit of God ‘hovering and pouting’ over the face of the waters (psyche).” This of course is
not a flippant interpretation of the textual material under analysis.
When equating the six days of creation, to the first six numbers (1-6), it is not difficult to
realize that the number seven: i.e. seventh day of creation is in the second chapter of Genesis.
If this above analysis of the text is correct, then the original authors of the Torah cloaked a cycle
esoterically (hidden) into the first two chapters of Genesis. These authors esoterically
numbered that cycle one through nine (1-9) by connecting the end of the second chapter of
Genesis round to the first verse of Genesis. Why have not Judaism and/or Christianity written
anything about these textual nuances over the past two to six millenniums?
The main reason why this may not have occurred over time is because Christians, for the
most part, do not study the Hebrew text nor do the Jews view their scriptures through the
lenses of Christianity. This cycle could not have been envisaged without grasping the definition
of the Hebrew word Bara. For the common man to just read the English translation, if the
definition of the word ‘bara’ is not known as it was to me, it is impossible to visualize this cycle.
The second reason that there is nothing written about this cycle in Genesis or anything like it i s
34 THE ORION MYSTERY: Unlocking the secrets of the Pyramids, by R. Bauval and A. Gi lbert
35 THE SIRIUS MYSTERY, by Robert Temple, (pg. #31)
20

because Christianity reasons in cyclic modes: they await their Messiah’s return, whereas,
Judaism’s thought process is linear (straight line) for they still await the first appearance of their
Messiah. Actually both Christianity and Judaism have their Messiahs eternally at hand. The
circle is Christianity’s and the straight line is Judaism. One is the benevolent Messiah because
there is eternal life in Christian theology and the circle represents that symbolically. Judaism’s
Messiah is the straight line, which envisions no life after death, which crushes all hope for
eternal life. One Messiah forgives sin and the other has no mercy for those that commit even
the smallest fraction of error. These are inherent archetypes, which can be witnessed etched
out in the life of each individual believer, whether he is of the Jewish or of the Christian faith.
The above Cycle of Divine Creation36 is a fanciful concept on the surface, for what value does
it bring to the interpretation of the text of the sacred scriptures? For this cycle to just hang out
there like that is not going to prove anything to anybody. It can be said to be an anomaly in the
textual wording, which can allow for such an interpretation, or it can be said to be just one
person’s over active imagination at work. I recognized the limitations of such a discovery in the
text if it has no purpose other than hanging out there with nothing to do. Unless it can be
shown just what benefit such a cycle can have on the interpretation of the Genesis te xt it was
worst then useless. It was an embarrassment but nonetheless it is a correct interpretation of
the text or at least what we have of it at this point.
36 The fi rst two and half years of my researches from August 1974 thru January 1977, I had argued the val idi ty of the
fi rs t two ve rses of Ge nesis, argued with Saint Augustine’s confessions, discove red the writings of Ma ry Ba ke r Eddy’s
Chri s tian Science Metaphysics and intuited The Cycl e of Divine Creation. What were the odds that a bible s tudent
would come across this kind of material in such a short period of time? As I look back at that period of time I am
convinced that the Holy Spi ri t had guided my hand in these matters .
21

I continued to maul over this cycle in every way that I could imagine but to no avail 37. Finally,
in mid or late September of 1978, some twenty months after this initial discovery of this cycle in
Genesis, an astrologer friend38 of mine, who is the leading astrologer in the Central New York
area, was conducting a parapsychology class. In one of these sessions he handed out a single
sheet of paper, which gave a one-line definition of each of the 12-signs of the Zodiac. Up to this
point in time I had about as much knowledge of Astrology as the average person on the street,
which amounts to basically nothing. I knew about fortune telling and the horoscopes in
newspapers, which I gave no credence to; however, this was about the extent of my knowledge
on the subject. Upon reading the text of these twelve one-liners on the Zodiac constellations I
was astounded and literally overwhelmed by the definition for the sign of Capricorn, “the goat
that fed the gods.” That is all the definition for Capricorn that was written on that sheet of
paper but it would revolutionize my thought process on the first chapter of Genesis. I instantly
saw the possible connection between the ending of the second verse of Genesis and the
beginning of the third verse (the beginning of day one of creation) of Genesis in relationship to
this definition of Capricorn, the tenth sign of the Zodiac. I fully realize, at this point, the average
reader will see nothing in that little phrase. But it meant everything to me. It, for a moment,
put the cosmos back together again; but, it also would create an interminable chaos. The word
‘Elohym’ translated by inapt (or quite intelligent ones) translators literally means “gods, angels.”
It has a feminine and a plural connotation in its theological makeup. When “Elohym (gods)39
said, let there be light,” it is not difficult to envisage this plea as a prayer. How could Elohym
(translated God) be praying to anyone? Such an idea makes no sense if God is monotheistic.
Elohym from my point of view symbolizes the infinite knowledge of God that ego-consciousness
secularizes; thus, it would be the dead Word of God that is crying out in the DARKNESS for there
to be LIGHT. If the initiate understood that it would revolutionize religion in our day.
It was, therefore, reasonable to assume that since the first verse of Genesis represented
number eight (#8) followed by the second verse of Genesis, which is designated number nine
(#9) that number ten (#10) would follow. If this number ten (#10) represents the sign of
Capricorn it would mean that all the numbers in the creation account related to the Zodiac and
that would place the second and third days of creation as harboring also the eleventh and
twelfth signs of Astrology respectively. The Zodiac’s twelve-signs would limit the size of this
pattern’s data. This would equate Capricorn and day one of creation forevermore. It occurred
to me that the word Light could represent number one (#1) and Darkness would represent the
number ten (#10) in the first day of creation, Heavens would represent number two (#2) and the
Firmament would represent number eleven (#11) in the second day of creation, Earth would
represent number three (#3) and Elohym would represent number twelve (#12) in the third day
of creation. This above scenario would produce a mathematical quandary in the text of the first
chapter of Genesis.
37 I should mention here that in June 1978 God gave me the greatest spiritual gi ft of my l i fe. I h ad a vi s ion, which
lasted merely a nanosecond that explained to me, in no uncertain terms, that there was no such thing as death. I
envi saged the sum-total of all knowledge: this was obviously Gabriel’s visitation. I had gl impse of eterni ty. I have
di s cussed this vi sion in my other wri tings I merely mention i t here to i l lus trate the chronology of my research.
38 De nnis “Chuck” Col e, Live rpool, New York, We became friend sometime after this first encounter.
39 The Zohar has the word ‘ELOHYM’ associated representing the twelve signs of the zodiac.
22

7// 8, 9, 10-1, 11-2, 12-3, 4, 5, 640
Now when we review this array of numbers we must ask ourselves how these numbers come
together in the proper order. Using the 10-1, 11-2, 12-3 scenario, in this array of numbers as a
guide, it is not difficult to complete the cycle.
As you can see it was just a matter of bringing the remaining days of creation, four thru six
(4-6) around to meet and interlock with the numbers seven thru nine (7-9). Curious enough
after completing this cycle I did everything I could to escape the taint of Astrology in my thought
processes; yet, at the same time I was searching the libraries of the world looking for ancient
verification of such a cyclic pattern. Now that the nine-part Cycle of Divine Creation had
morphed into a twelve part cycle I called this new twelve part cycle, THE CYCLE OF GENESIS (10-
1, 11-2, 12-3, 7-4, 8-5, and 9-6).
40 I had absolutely no idea at this time that from out of this array of numbers I was choos ing one set of cycles over
another. It would not be for many years after this initial analysis that I would intuit from out of this array of numbers
the key to discovering the Zodiac/Calendar year that span the enti re length of fi rs t four chapters of Genes i s .
Beginning with the 10-1, 11-2 and 12-3 s cenario I eventually realized that the first number presented the s ign of the
Zodiac and the second number represented the month of the Calendar Year (Day One of Creation Gen. 3-5; = 10-1;
whereas, the 10 = Capricorn and 1 = January); thus, with the 10-1, 11-2 and 12-3 s cenario in play i t was not di fficul t
from the full array 7// 8, 9, 10-1, 11-2, 12-3, 4, 5, 6 to determine the signs of the Zodiac and the Calendar months laid
out to the fourth chapter of Genes i s .
23

Psychologically I had no idea that I was working against myself. Hindsight is 20/20. My basic
problem at this time in my researches on the text of the sacred scriptures is that I did not know
anything about Astrology and I did not believe it would be necessary to know anything about it.
All I knew is that from my youth Astrology was considered forbidden knowledge. Astrology in
the eyes of Catholicism is a tabooed subject to study. It became my primary mandate to ignore
all references to Astrology and at the same time to search out and confirm the validity of the
Cycle of Genesis I discovered via a one-line astrological definition of the sign of Capricorn. The
dogma of Catholicism had become, without my knowing it, shackles on my thought process.
It would actually take me four and a half (4½) additional years before this cycle in Genesis
made any sense at all. Of course I was researching the first chapter of Genesis ad nauseam,
during this time, to no avail. This does not mean that my time in those four and a half (4½)
years were wasted. On the contrary, it was a valuable period of time to wade through the trash
of humanity rejecting basically everything in my wake in my quest for truth. Unlike Pilate, who
asked Christ, “What is truth?” I did not know what it was but I did know what it was not. For me
the crème of academic thought on the subjects of the Bible, history, tradition, philosophy or
whatever was nothing more than fuel for the fire in the outer darkness. None of those authors
thought processes made any sense. Their thought did not sync with reality as I was intuiting it.
Like Johannes Kepler,41 who cleansed the stables of Astronomy/Astrology of the horse manure
to make room for his discoveries of universal motion, I too found myself cleansing the hallowed
halls of academia of all its bull manure. If anything I was the harshest critic of human thought
that I knew of. I asked for no quarter and I gave none.
Something put me into this world and that was enough of evidence for me to know that there
was a God. God had to be without qualification omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscience;
therefore, if He is the cause of my life then I was entitled as the Son of God42 to be privy to His
very being and existence. I would accept nothing less from Him.
THE CYCLE OF GENESIS
The precise date that I began to understand The Cycle of Genesis was April eleventh 198343; I
was browsing a book-warehouse selling discounted books. I came across a book that dealt with
an astrological theory concerning the twelve (12) sons of Jacob44 in the Bible. It must have been
the years of rejecting such ideas and materials like it that my defense mechanism broke down
and I purchased the volume. I felt it just might be worth searching out how this particular
theory related to the Bible. This book was not really remarkable in any sense of the word other
41 COSMOS: The Harmony of the Worlds (video series: Episode #3) wri tten and narrated by Carl Sagan . I use the
example of Johannes Kepler here also as a perfect example of someone choosing the Scale of Darkness over the Scale
of Li ght. Ke pler’s choice of materialism over the teachings of the Church, which actually includes Astrology, i s where
he made hi s mi s take in tos s ing out As trology with the bathwater.
42 1 John 3:1; “Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us that we should be called the Sons of
God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.”
43 Thi s was a very traumatic and psychological transition. When I discovered the true meaning behind The Cycle of
Genesis I could not sleep for four days. There was no doubt in my mind that an archetype of the psyche was coming
forward to dominate the conscious life. I vi sited my doctor who gave me powerful s leeping medication to fight i t off.
44 12 SIGNS, 12 SONS: As trology in the Bible (1978), by David A. Womack
24

than that it enlightened me on some of the rudiments of Astrology. I did not understand the
book’s basic premise but that is beside the point. I really did not try to understand it. Up to the
time that I read it I really knew nothing about Astrology that amounted to anything. Yes, I
gleamed a cycle some years before based upon a one-line statement about the sign of Capricorn
but that was an anomaly. My reasoning was a bit different now since I learned a bit more about
Astrology. I now understood that there were distinct mathematical and geometric patterns
formatted, in the cycle of the Zodiac, by the four basic elements of Astrology: Fire [1-5-9], Earth
[2-6-10], Air [3-7-11] and Water [4-8-12], in relationship to its twelve signs. These elements are
called Triplicities because there are 3-signs to each of them. Then there are the three
Quadruplicities: Cardinal [1-4-7-10], Fixed [2-5-8-11] and Mutable [3-6-9-12] signs intertwined
with the Triplicities in the same Zodiac cycle, which also gave off distinct patterns. These
Triplicities and Quadruplicities in a normal cycle of one-thru-twelve (1-12) gave off very orderly
patterns that cannot be denied. I then decided to search out the Cycle of Genesis by
determining where in it the Triplicities and Quadruplicities would array themselves.
As far as the Triplicities45 and Quadruplicities46 are concerned, there is perfect symmetry to
their patterns in the Cycle of Genesis. All four sets of Triplicities are perfectly mated in
relationship to each other in the above diagram, as are the three sets of Quadruplicities, in the
other example of the cycle, are also in perfect harmony. All four sets of Triplicities are mirroring
each other’s patterns. In addition, the Quadruplicities demonstrate that the Cardinal, Fixed and
Mutable signs of Astrology each have the same basic pattern intertwining them mirror imaging
45 I have color coded the Triplicities to correspond to their element, which I believe are their traditional colors given to
them.
46 I have addi tional ly color coded the Quadrupl ici ties according to thei r tradi tional colors .
25

each other. For those that know something about Astrology this is all simplistic but for me at
the time I was learning about it for the first time, it was a great revelation that inspired my
thought concerning the Cycle of Genesis. At the present time the Cycle of Genesis must be seen
as a cycle that overlaid the entire first chapter of Genesis.
What also caught my attention at this time was that if the Triplicities are on display the
Quadruplicities are out of sight out of mind and vice versa. This was clearly a concept
illustrating how the psyche can be blocked from seeing something. There was much to intuit
here from a symbolic sense. The mere fact that in Astrology the Triplicities and the
Quadruplicities were amalgamated to the same cycle; whereby, one system knew nothing of the
other was where my fledgling thought began seriously to think in turns of esotericism. This
concept of two systems amalgamated into one was clear symbolic proof of the possibility of
there be an Esoteric Science. Then there is of course the Zodiac Cycle and the Calendar Year,
which are also married to the same cycle and clearly the Zodiac knows nothing of the Calendar
and vice versa. In these early stages of my researches I was beginning to equate the Trivium
and the Quadruvium to the Triplicities and the Quadruplicities and in this manner I began to see
the legitimate possibilities of there being a mathematical science hidden beneath the
grammatical texts of the sacred scriptures. I had previously heard of such an Esoteric Science;
however, in hearing of it no one explained how to access it, which is one of the tragedies of
modernity: rhetoric without demonstrable evidence. I don’t think anyone actually knew just
how this Esoteric Science was structured into the texts nor how it could be brought to the
surface. Yes, Gematria was known insofar as the study of Hebrew letters and words; however, it
is only in factoring in the Seven Liberal Arts: Trivium and Quadruvium that brings perspective to
the problem of how the Esoteric Science was codified to the sacred scriptures and how it could
be harvested.
26

CHAPTER TWO
THE CYCLE OF DARKNESS
The Cycle of Darkness is none other than the Cycle of Genesis but it will be examined from a
totally different perspective. Previously we have seen that this cycle came out of the text in
very symmetrical patterns in relationship to the Triplicities and the Quadruplicities. It was
indeed a break-through to finally embrace the mathematics and symbolism of Astrology. That is
as far as I would take Astrology. I have yet to meet anyone that could predict something that
had any life changing or mind altering data from out of a horoscope. Fortune telling was out of
the question as far as my thought processes went and the science of Astrology would be
considered a mathematical, symbolic, and linguistic tool. Little did I realize that I would be able
to illustrate this self-appointed dogmatic principle to my satisfaction with a precision that would
manifest itself with demonstrable evidence; heretofore, not seen in hermetic, religious or
academic studies on the sacred scriptures since the days of the Alchemists in the seventeenth
century.
It occurred to me after reviewing the outcome of the Cycle of Genesis from the perspective
of the Triplicities and Quadruplicities that this cycle could be contrasted with what could be
euphemistically called the Cycle of Light: The Zodiac Cycle use the numbers one through twelve
(1-12) sequentially.
The questions that began to come to mind after seeing these cycles of Triplicities and
Quadruplicities were perplexing; for the reason that, they did not synchronize conceptually with
what the literal text of the sacred scriptures were saying. How could such cycles be justified in
lieu of what the surface area of the text was saying? I could not justify them then because I had
no knowledge of what these cycles were all about or why they would be esoterically and
mysteriously not explicitly written into the surface storyline. I considered myself in a real
cultural dilemma about now because a person would begin to question his own sanity when
confronted with such graphical evidence when the whole world seems to know nothing about
them; however, I had no alternative but to continue with my researches in the hopes of coming
out at the other end unscathed by the dark forces that seem to dominate our world. In a sense
there was no place to go religiously or philosophically. I could not return to the old way of
thought. I gone through that maze and have come out on the other side of it. I had built up,
over the years, such an animosity towards the academic way of thought the very idea of getting
caught up in their rhetoric sickened me. The way of philosophy was not a viable avenue to
escape into either because it as a science also was riddled with contradictions. Every clown that
has a set of vocal cords is heralded as the Messiah of the age.
As the cycles of Light and Darkness are studied it is seen that the number ten (#10) in the
Cycle of Darkness has usurped the position of the number one (#1) in the Cycle of Light. As each
number is usurped from one cycle to another it in turn usurp another number in that cycle until
one cycle is completed from the other; however, this only brought to the fore an additional
cycle, which in turned implied a number of cycles was within some kind of esoteric system;
27

therefore, I was literally forced, through such reasoning, to extrapolate out to determine how
many cycles were in the system. I realized of course that the system was limited to the amount
of cells to a cycle especially when one cell (#7) was anchored to its position permanently. The
array of cycles only went out to eleven. When circumambulating the cycles it can be seen that a
distinct pattern reveals itself whether the numbers are exchanged either way from one cycle to
another. That pattern is as follows: from right to left or left to right
1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 11, 3, 6, 12, 5, 10
The number seven (#747) is anchored in each of these cycles. It is the only number that is not
in motion. We can continue with this sequent pattern, from one cycle to another, until
repetition sets in. A total of eleven cycles are obtained for this stationary number seven (#7)
sector, which is indicative of an even grander system of cycles. Naming this first set of cycles, as
Sector #7 is not difficult to envisage since the number seven (#7) itself sets the precedent. If
each of the twelve (12) signs of the Zodiac were placed into house #7, and each of the signs
were made stationary for its own eleven cycles, a total of 132-cycles will manifest in just this
one sector. This will produce a total of fifteen hundred and eighty -four (1584) cycles in all
twelve (12) sectors of the system: eleven times twelve times twelve (11 * 12 * 12) 48.
In the chart on the next page I have deliberately jump ahead in naming THE CYCLES OF
DIVINE CREATION in order to place this chart here for the reader’s consideration.
From this point forward I can no longer give an exact chronicle version of my research
because this research from this point forward is an combination of other researches I have
conducted over the years, which all came to bear on THE CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION. This
chart (the equivalent of graphic images of the cycles) is as far as I got in those turbulent days
47 This #7 symbolizes the second chapter of Genesis, which will be recognize in my researches as the
Garden of Eden.
48 Thi s figure ‘1584’is obvi ously a number to do with the precession of the Equinoxes; especially, i f all twelve sectors
had twelve ins tead of eleven cycles : 12 * 12 * 12 (12³) = 1728.
28

between April eleventh and April 1fifth 1983. I would literally not seriously revisit the cycles for
another twelve years.
On April 1fifth 1983 after having rested I looked at the work I conducted on the cycles in four
sleepless days, which was quite a lot of material. Again, I asked myself the question, “Who
would believe my report?”
I realized that outwardly it would seem that all of this was merely an invention of my mind
and that the entire system of 1584-cycles was merely an extrapolation of the first cycle of nine
parts and I would wholly agree with that assessment if someone had come at me with what
appeared to be a cockamamie theory if I did not immediately understand it. It would take me
many more years to understand how to deal with this material. In and of itself it appeared to be
‘creation out of nothing’. Nobody is going to believe it because I had no context to relate it to o r
contrast it against.
I looked at my one bookcase library49, which was only about half full, at the time, to see if I
could find an ancient work that could possibly have a mathematical system codified to it. After
a few minutes I reached for Dante Alighieri’s La Divina Commedia and within just a few minutes I
intuited an arithmetical system, which would take me twelve years to unravel.
The work I did on Dante Alighieri’s La Divina Commedia Mathematical System50, which was
published 1998 would invariably aid me in my work on THE CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION. I
revisited the Cycles of Divine Creation in late 1994 while awaiting publication of work on Dante
Alighieri’s La Divina Commedia. I did not begin writing my second work until 1998: THE
49 Thi s one bookcase pales compared to my present l ibrary that surrounds me today.
50 THE CONQUEST OF GENESIS: A Study in Universal Creation Mathematics (thi s work i s presently out of print)
http://www.amazon.com/The-Conques t-Genes i s -Mathematics -
Literature/dp/0773489878/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top
29

SECRETS and THE MYSTERIES OF GENESIS: Antiquity’s Hall of Records51, published in 2003,,
which I included a preliminary account of THE CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION. In this work I would
also republish a detail account of my work on Dante Alighieri’s Mathematical System, which I
also place online52 for public use.
Finally, besides my many Independent Academic papers53, my last work related to my
research on the Sistine Chapel54 and other Christians artworks throughout the first sixteen
hundred years of Christianity. This was published in December 2012.
51 http://www.amazon.com/The-Secrets-Mysteries-Genesis-
Antiquitys /dp/1412010128/ref=pd_sim_sbs_b_1?ie=UTF8andrefRID=1RRW00W4K7B9TM78YZZS
52https ://www.academia.edu/5121750/DANTE_ALIGHIERIS_LA_DIVINA_COMMEDIAS_MATHEMATICAL_SYSTEM
53 https ://independent.academia.edu/WilliamJohnMeegan
54 www.wi lliamjohnmeegan.com
30

CHAPTER THREE
THE STARS OF DAVID
The Cycle of Light and the Cycle of Hell
The mere fact that I could generate eleven cycles out of nothing was in itself initially
unnerving; however, it had me thinking of what possible uses could come of them. Remember
that the Cycle of Genesis (later called the Cycle of Darkness) was conceived out of an analysis of
the basic structural pattern of the first two chapters of Genesis. It wasn’t reasonable or logical
to assume that the additional cycles would extrapolate out pass the first two chapters.
Remember also that when I initially conceived of The Cycle of Genesis back in September of
1978 I had already had a glimmer of an idea that each of the scriptural words could be
astrologically orientated to the cells of the different cycles. In fact my initial insight to the
words, LIGHT (1), DARKNESS (10), HEAVEN (2), FIRMAMENT (12), EARTH (3) and Elohym (12)
never wavered and back in those early days I knew nothing of Astrology.
There will be those that will realize that I had used consciously and instinctually the Zodiac
Cycle to represent the Cycle of Light rather than the Calendar Cycle. In every sense this is
correct. Yes, consciously, I made that intuitive decision; however, if I had chosen the Calendar
Year to guide me; though, the Calendar Year never even entered my mind at the time, the
results would have been skewed completely; because, of the arithmetical data sequenced in
THE CYCLE OF GENESIS; though, the Zodiac Cycle and the Calendar Year are inherently
amalgamated to each other. It can be said that serendipitously the Capricorn (#10) returned to
its right place in the zodiacal and calendar cycle. My choice of the Zodiac over the Calendar
cycle I believe, in looking back over the situation stemmed from my initial reading of the
definition of the Capricorn sign of the Zodiac and relating it with the first day of creation (Gen.
1:3-5).
This Cycle of Light was so named because the numbers one through twelve (1-12) ran
sequentially throughout. The Cycle of Light should be looked at as representing the
Zodiac/Calendar Year55. I recognized the pattern of the STAR OF DAVID, seen outlined in the
diagrams below as it is presently known in the twenty-first century in the Zodiac/Calendar year.
There are four signs-months with 30-days associated to them: Aries-April-1, Gemini-June-3,
Virgo-September-6, and Scorpio-November-8. See this outline played out in the Cycle of Light.
These four signs-months produce what can be likened to a butterfly pattern. There is only one
way to produce two other similar patterns that would generate all twelve signs-months into its
schema. When analyzing the Cycle of Light, which represents our present Zodiac-Calendar Year,
the pattern 1-3-6-8, 2-4-9-11 and 5-7-10-12 reveals itself; however, to achieve that in this cycle
of the Zodiac used for the Cycle of Light foreknowledge of the Star of David in the
Zodiac/Calendar year had to be known. Now study the Cycle of Hell, from the calendar
perspective counterclockwise, with this same numerical sequencing, in its cycle, in mind (as if
55 Thi s is from my work on Dante Al ighieri’s Mathematical System
31

the Calendar Year was the Zodiac Year), using the Quadruplicities: the Mutable Signs 3-6-9-12 (in
the calendar month positions of 1-3-6-8), Fixed Signs 2-5-8-11 (in the calendar month positions
of 2-4-9-11) and the Cardinal Signs 1-4-7-10 (in the calendar month positions of 5-7-10-12). This
kind of uniformity in the Cycle of Hell cannot be just a coincidence. This is one of the sacred
mysteries in the text. This pattern actually produces a Star of David dead center to the Zodiac-
Calendar Year from the astrological perspective. When the Cycle of Hell is studied it is found to
be coming from the Calendar-Zodiac perspective as if in a perverse pattern of the Cycle of Light.
Both these cycles produce a Star of David but one would produce the star for the antichrist, the
other for the Christ. After all the antichrist is the ruler over Hell. This Cycle of Hell was what
Saint Augustine was talking about, which was already discussed above. The reader should realize
that the Cycle of Darkness is positioned between the Cycle of Light and the Cycle of Hell (see the
above chart: The Number Seven in Sector #7).
The Star of David56 configuration, via the three separate ‘butterfly patterns’ I arranged in the
Cycle of Light and in the Cycle of Hell, are color coded to draw the reader’s attention to how the
Star of David in the Cycle of Hell tries, as it may, to imitate the basic rudimentary features of the
Zodiac using astrological theology; so-to-speak, in order to demonstrably make obvious its logic
or is that vice versa: meaning the Cycle of Light is actually imitating the Cycle of Hell? It is as if
the Cycle of Hell was trying to forcibly integrate the merging of the opposites by combining
Astrology’s Quadruplicities with the Calendar year months. It turns out that this is not the way it
is suppose to be envisaged. Initially, as a pioneer researching these cycles it took some time, for
me, to envisage the Star of David from out of the Cycle of Hell. I discerned it only because I
persistently analyzed the Cycle of Hell ad nausea knowing there had to be a purpose to it. Yes,
looking at the Cycle of Hell now it appears so obvious; however, back in the early days of my
initial discovery of these cycles (April 1983), not knowing what their purpose was, it was not so
easy to search out the patterns that are inherent in them. It was not until the late nineteen
nineties that I finally intuited the pattern of the Star of David in THE CYCLE OF HELL. If you were
to ask a novice that knew just the basics about Astrology and ask him to discern a pattern out of
56 Thi s Star of David is a major motif in the Genesis creation account and the pattern of the Sta r of David does not
begin and end with these cycles. The Star of David and the Kabbalistic Tree of Life is actually codified to the fi rst word
of Genesis when it is extrapolated out to the Genesis Formula and there is a gigantic version of each of these symbols
l a id out in the first chapter of Genesis’ textual materials. I have discus s e d the s e nua nce s i n my publ i s he d works
where out demonstrate that the UNIVERSAL MATHEMATICAL MATRIX, which mys tical ly produces these graphic
images and this matrix the original source material that the ancient sages used to write the sacred s criptures .
32

it I dare say he would fail as I had. It takes years sometimes to get a proper understanding on
some apparently simple nuances.
The reader has seen my explanation as to how I discovered this system of cycles. After
intuiting the first nine part cycle it would appear as if the cycles self -created and incarnated into
manifest creation. In looking at it in hindsight it basically happened spontaneously. My part was
merely pulling a string so-to-speak and the whole thing unraveled. Yes, the cycles were already
mystically in the texts; however, no one knew about them and it was as if they were waiting for
the moment to come forward. All they needed was a nudge to get them out of their inertia.
The reader will have to bear with me, as I try to explain this internal scriptural analysis.
Remember that it was Saint Augustine that said, “God was creating Hell before he created the
Heavens and the Earth”, which so unnerved me that it inspired me into analyzing the first two
verses of Genesis incessantly even though initially I did not believe the first two verses of
Genesis were part of the original scriptural text
The enigma, in what I have envisaged from out of the sacred scriptures, is that these Cycles
of Divine Creation, from modernity’s point of view should not be; nonetheless, it is what it is.
The cycles are a valid interpretation of the Word of God. It will take many more years than my
life for many other researchers to obtain a proper understanding of them.
My initial problem was to determine how many cycles there were in the system; though,
there are theoretically fifteen hundred and eighty-four cycles to the overall system this article
will only deal with eleven (11) of those cycles. That is merely one out of one hundred and forty
four (144) segments These eleven cycles only deal with the texts of the first two chapters of
Genesis; whereas, the overall Zodiac/Calendar year where Virgo holds up the Scales of Libra
goes out to the end of the fourth chapter of Genesis.
Symbolism has a way of saying things in the din of its silence that articles such as this cannot
convey in an ocean of ink. Words cannot express the simplicity of the obvious and when the
wisdom of symbolism is discerned man has the tendency to say, “so what new”. What the
symbolism is saying and what man think it is saying are light-years apart.
In order to understand what The Cycles of Divine Creation are expressing spirituality one has
to already understand them collectively not just knowing one or two of them. If the initiate fails
to understand them all then the complexity of the message they are conveying is lost. That
nuance alone eluded me for the longest time.
Symbolism is extremely difficult to understand unless it is understood that each symbol
has an infinite amount of meanings. The first chapter of Genesis alone has hundreds of
concepts that are separated out by the grammatical and mathematical patterns codified to the
texts. The same geometrical images can produce a dozen or more conceptual, which have to be
assimilated to get the over picture. There is no destination to be reached for knowledge of God
is infinite and there is no limited amount of knowledge that can produce its infinite nuances.
I have deliberately not gone into the minutia in illustrating my findings, concerning these
charts and diagrams, in order that the readers can work some of these problems out for
themselves. Working the dynamics of one cycle from another; the first being the Cycle of
Darkness, forward to the Cycle of Light, etc., etc or in reverse from the Cycle of Hell, etc., etc.
should be no problem.
The basic pattern to these eleven cycles that I outlined above and below is:
1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 11, 3, 6, 12, 5, 10
33

When the reader in looking over the chart above, The Number Seven in Sector #7, it will be
seen that each column (not row) has the same numerical format ordered sequentially as if it was
in a continuous loop. Each row is also formatted in a cyclic format seeing each of them
represents a separate cycle; thus, the first two chapters of Genesis in conveying to the initiate a
basic paradigmatic law that each human being is psychically subject to. Through the study of
these cycles, sequentially (backwards and/or forward) over and over again cyclically it will be
realized that every cycle is the same cycle. It is as if the soul’s entire being is subject to this
spherical authority. This sphere is I believe the MONAD (what humans call God). This chart and
its cycles are merely expressing the idea of Astrology’s Universal Paradigm. The cy cles,
themselves, don’t exist in the real world or the psychic realm.
There are three main parts to these eleven cycles in The Number Seven in Sector #7 that I
have revamped here and in two other charts illustrating the SCALES OF LIBRA: the Scale of Light
and the Scale of Darkness. The three parts of the chart are:
1. Cycle of Hell
a. The Cycle of Hell is the central cycle of the eleven cycles in The Number Seven in
Sector #7; because, it represents the central pole that holds aloft the Scales of Light
and Darkness. Everything culminates in its precincts.
i. In a sense this is disingenuous because every cycle is symbolically
representing every other cycle. This illustrates that the initiate can work his
or her way out of the SCALE OF DARKNESS; however, It is not as easy for
those that are cast from the Garden of Eden: i.e. SCALE OF LIGHT to return
to the Garden of Eden seeing the initiate rejected it.
34

35

b. TRIPLICITIES laid out in the CYCLE OF HELL: are in a sense a numerical sequence,
which would be equivalent to CHAOS because essentially that is what the Cycle of
Hell symbolizes. It would appear that there is order here that is materialistic or ego-consciousness’
order, which has nothing to do with spirituality. It would appear as if
the TRIPLICITIES are being noted by numbering them not through the symbolism of
the numbers; but, rather using reason and logic absent spiritual guidance.
i. The mere fact that the twelve signs of the Zodiac are numbered in four
sequential sets of numbers symbolizing the Elements: i.e. Triplicities, which
is extremely important to note. Here the elements are seen as materialistic
ideas as in the four nuclear forces.
ii. Another factor concerning the Elements: i.e. Triplicities: Fire, Earth, Air and
Water is that they are located in their proper locations in both the Zodiac
and the Calendar year slots; however, the four groups of Elements are not
numbered properly meaning that the signs of the Zodiac’s Elements may be
in there Elemental category’s slots but not in their proper zodiacal place in
the heavens.
iii. The fact that the Triplicities and the Quadruplicities and the data for
creating the STAR OF DAVID are correct-data points means the real world
has the proper data (religious knowledge: tradition, dogma and doctrine);
i.e. construction materials to build the Temple of God just as David obtained
all the materials so that his son Solomon could use it to build the temple in
Jerusalem.
1. Esoterically this would mean that the rudiments of the religious
education (symbolically Astrology) is handed down from one
generation to another and it is up to each generation to understand
how to put that material together psychically to build the Temple of
God within one’s own psyche.
2. There is a great difference between Solomon Temple in the
rectangle (Jewish: i.e. iconoclastic) and Solomon Temple in the
Round (Christian: i.e. symbolists).
iv. The fact that the Triplicities and the Quadruplicities are in synch in some
kind of scientific order based upon reason and logic would indicate that the
material world has all that it needs to build the Garden of Eden: i.e. Temple
of God in the psyche, which infers that there is a separation of Church and
State here: the religious and secular knowledge is separate from each other.
It is obvious that the key is to amalgamate the two separate systems into a
harmonious whole.
The reader should always bear in mind that initially the CYCLE OF HELL is not
split into two parts. That has to be discerned and distinguished by the initiate
through his or her meditations on the problems presented by the sacred scriptures.
He or she has to discerns what the symbolism is saying.
36

c. QUADRUPLICITIES laid out in the CYCLE OF HELL: The Cycle of Hell’s aspect that
utilizes the Quadruplicities takes on the numerical data that configures the Star of
David in the Zodiac/Calendar year and works it through the materialistic
perspective: configuring it to the construct of the Calendar Year.
2. The Cycle of Darkness and the four cycles that follows it.
a. The Cycle of Darkness is configured right out of the first two verses of Genesis,
which I will get to; however, the wording of the texts of the first two verses clearly
states that it is separating (Bara) the heavens (wicked imagination of man) and the
earth. The heavens and the earth are combined as one in the Cycle of Hell.
i. The question that must be asked is what are the heavens and what is the
earth in symbolic parlance?
b. The Cycles Light, Heaven, Earth and Firmament collectively have 207-words, which is
the Gematria value of the word “LIGHT” in the first and fourth days of creation.
These four cycles collectively represent the Scale of Light as oppose to the Scale of
Darkness.
c. In reading the texts of the first four days of creation it can be envisaged that these
four cycles is what brought forth the wording of the texts. If each one of the first
four days of creation are read along with the study of these cycles via the
Quadruplicities and Triplicities the texts unfold in the cycles.
d. The Cycle of Darkness initiates the new Heaven and the new Earth. Without the aid
of divine province the initiate can never receive a vision: new raison d’être (reason
for existence).
e. Once the Cycle of Light is constructed all else in the first four days of creation stem
from that. Previously, the Quadruplicities dominated the psyche of the individual
forcing him or her to live in the Hell of religious tyranny. When I use the word
religion here it is because the symbolism expresses it as such; however, that
religious tyranny could just as well be society’s mores.
i. The Quadruplicities represent: Cardinal, Fixed and Mutable or past, present
and future respectively: i.e. the space/time continuum. In the Cycle of Hell
the process is brought to a halt when the numerical configurations for the
Star of David were forced into the calendar’s perspective creating a
secular/religious government similar if not the same as Judaism, Protestant
Christianity and the Islamic regimes57: i.e. “My way or the highway”.
f. Once the Cycle of Light is brought forth than a new paradigm can be expressed. The
Cycle of Light and the next three cycles: Heaven, Earth and the Firmament express
themselves via the Triplicities. These four elements: Fire, Earth, Air and Water
respectively are the basic ingredients for bringing forth a new creation.
g. The Scale of Light is culled out of the DARKNESS as expressed in the first day of
37
creation.
57 Thi s is often said of the Catholic Church, which I beg to differ. Those that make such remarks about the Church
have no concept of what symbolism is all about. In fact these kinds of people are iconoclastic. These fundamentalists
read history l iterally as if i t actually took place in real -time; rather, than the record being an esoteric cons truct
‘mythol ogically’ of the Word of God. I ca n only a ssume that this i s where the American Founding Fathers (that were
members of the Masonic Order) obtained their understanding that religion should be separated from government
control . It appears quite clearly to be unequivocal ly a bibl ical mandate.

3. The Cycle of the Garden and the four cycles that follows it.
a. Or it could be said that these four Cycles: Adam, Vegetation, Sabbath and the
Garden are brought forth from the Cycle of the Sea.
b. Those that study the numerical sequences of the cycles will see that they either
conform to the Quadruplicities, Triplicities or the numerical data conforming to the
construct of the Star of David.
c. Starting with the Cycle of the Sea the numerical configuration goes back to the
Quadruplicities; whereas, the previous five cycles dealt with Triplicities, which
brought about the new creation.
d. From the Cycle of Adam the numerical data of the cycles are morphing into the
numerical data that configures the Star of David. The next five cycles after the Cycle
of the Sea deal solely with the Star of David’s numerical data.
e. The Cycle of Hell also deals with the Star of David’s numerical data; however, it does
so using the numerical data in the Cardinal, Fixed and Mutable Quadruplicities.
People that study Astrology do not normally deal with the Zodiac’s Triplicities and
Quadruplicities because they are thought of as simplistic; yet, I find how the ancient scribes
used them to express themselves endlessly intriguing.
AS TO THE ORIGNS OF THE CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION
The Cycles of Divine Creation are formatted from one cycle to another on a clockwise not a
counterclockwise movement. The Cycles of Light, Heaven, Earth and Firmament represent the
first four days of creation sequentially (I’ll get to this later); thus, verifying the forward or
clockwise motion that symbolically represents the time/space continuum. Such verification
would also indicate that the sacred scripture is implicitly stating that there is no going back
through time to undo anything. If forward motion can be demonstrably demonstrated, why
cannot backward motion also be demonstrably demonstrated if that was possible?
Counterclockwise motion symbolizes there is no time-oriented sequences in the spiritual realm
and that is why I say the cycles cannot go backwards; however, that does mean that the initiate
can’t be waft into the spiritual realm.
The Triplicities (elements) using the Astrological perspective is the spiritual aspects of the
cycles, which symbolizes SCALE OF LIGHT; whereas, the Quadruplicities using the Calendar
Year’s perspective symbolizing THE SCALE OF DARKNESS.
These cycles that are codified into the Genesis Creation Account are dominated by the
number seven (#7), which should be obvious since the number seven (#7) is anchored to these
first eleven cycles into Torah. The number seven is sacred to Christiani ty and from what I gather
to most religions.
I have notice a similarity between Dante Alighieri’s wafting through a wall of flames, in the
twenty-seventh chapter of Purgatorio to get to the Garden of Eden to the circle of eleven cycles.
Clockwise the cycle can only go from the Cycle of the Garden to the Cycle of the Sea; though,
one would think it was from the Cycle of the Sea to the Cycle of the Garden. The Scale of
Darkness is patterned with the Quadruplicities, which represent a time-oriented sequence of
past, present and future; whereas, the Triplicities symbolize the new heaven and the new earth,
which represents creatio continua.
38

DEFINING CHRISTIANITY
IN RELATIONSHIP TO JUDAISM
I don’t consider Judaism to actually be a religion. The Old Testament is merely a cat’s
paw for Christianity to interpret its own mythoi. Judaism itself is very much like a
personal mythology that is acted out in the modern city streets. The history of the Jews
has no meaning other than representing the personal mythoi of an ancestral nomadic
tribe. Psychologically and insidiously, this is how the majority of human beings live out
their lives in the world as if they were wandering Jews: i.e. fugitives and vagabonds in
the earth.
I do not say this derogatorily; rather, I mention it merely to point out that Judaism,
itself, symbolically represent the materialistic and secular corporate mentality of
humanity that has absolutely no respect for spirituality whatsoever no matter what they
give lip-service to. In saying this I am not speaking of living Jews per se; rather, I am
speaking of the Jewish psychosis. I am equating 99.999…% percent of the human race
as having the same symbolic mentality as seen in the Jewish attitude toward life as
taught in the Old Testament (the eye for an eye mantra); therefore, classifying the
99.999…% of humanity as Jews.
For example, Jews are iconoclastic: i.e. meaning they have no belief in symbolism
whatsoever in their so-called sacred scriptures. Protestant Christianity, which is
basically heresy (Judaizers of Christianity) as far as the Catholic Church is concerned.
Protestants are also blatantly iconoclastic. Without symbolism there is no way of
reading the sacred scriptures (Word of God) of the world. Reading the sacred scriptures
literally is basic fundamentalism.
Most people that claim to be members of those religions that use symbolism in their
literature, artworks, monuments and churches (temples) have no educative
understanding of that symbolism; hence they are, for all intent and purpose,
iconoclastic; therefore, they are, in my eyes, classified as Jews whether they are
iconoclastic Chinese, Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, etc., etc.
Those that claim to be Jews and study their sacred texts via symbolism such as the
Kabbalistic Zohar, from my point of view, are not Jews. One cannot be a Kabbalist and
be a Jew that is oxymoronic. This is why the Supreme Court of Israel turned down so-called
Christian Jews for immigration visas because claiming to be a Christian Jew is
oxymoronic. Being a Jew, as being a Christian, is a religious distinction not an ethnic
distinction.
Symbolism is the basic reason that those that followed Christ had to split from
Judaism. Kabbalism is Christian Mysticism not Jewish Mysticism. This is why the Zohar
was banned from Judaism, which now is somewhat coming back into its own.
The Zohar is a commentary on the Old Testament, which are Christian documents
and not one word of that library of books was ever written by a Jew: i.e. an iconoclastic
individual.
THE NEW TESTAMENT IS A VERY TERSE AND SUCCINT COMMENTARY ON THE
ESOTERICISM CODIFIED TO THE OLD TESTAMENT.
39

CHAPTER FOUR
THE ASTROLOGICAL ORIENTATION OF SCRIPTURAL WORDS
The next logical step to take with these cycles is to determine if they astrologically orientated
scriptural words to this system of cycles. The Cycle of Darkness as the first cycle to appear in the
text, and which overlays the entire first chapter would by necessity be the first cycle to use in
this process of astrologically orienting words to these cycles.
The beginning of the Genesis Creation account actually begins, from the perspective of the
seventh day of creation, which is in the second chapter of Genesis. This is why, I believe, this set
of eleven cycles beginning with the Cycle of
Darkness has the number seven58 stationary.
Each of the eleven cycles is a repositioning of the
Cycle of Darkness, using the same numerical
pattern, no matter what names is given to them.
Therefore, it would be appropriate to orient the
word Bereshith: “In the beginning” to the
seventh house of this Cycle of Darkness. The first
letter of Genesis is Beth as I pointed out in the
last chapter. It has a numerical value of 412,
which reduces to its lowest common
denominator number seven. Now this
orientation of the word Bereshith to house seven
is tentative based upon further analysis of
orientating the other words, in the first and
second verses of Genesis, to this Cycle of
Darkness. The words Heaven and Earth literally
interpret and align themselves to the second and third houses of this cycle respectively because
of their association to the second and third days of creation. This then explains why the text of
the first verse of Genesis would be better off translated “In the beginning Elohym ‘separated’
the Heavens and the Earth.” Here in this ‘Cycle of Darkness’ the twelfth house is literally sitting
between (separating) the Heavens and the Earth. Here the word ‘Elohym’ has been placed
between the Heavens and the Earth. This synchronicity between the word ‘Bara’ in the textual
wording of the first verse and the positioning of the numbers two and three within the ‘Cycle of
Darkness ’, cannot be denied.
Notice that Elohym has been designated as the number twelve. The reason that I initially
designated this word to represent the number twelve is because Elohym is defined as ‘gods
(angels)’: i.e. twelve Astrological gods, which universally around the world denotes the twelve
58 Of course the Sabbath as a rest day has a great deal to do with once it is understood exactly what the
Sabbath symbolically means, which I will get into in the course of this article.
40

signs of the Zodiac. Another reason for designating Elohym is found in the Zohar, where it
literally tells us that Elohym represents the “the planets and their signs.” 59
“Rabbi Shimon then said, Elazar, what is Eleh (lit. ‘these’, which is spelled Aleph, Lamed,
Hei)? If you say that they are the planets and the signs of the zodiac, have they not always been
seen? … And if the term Eleh (which is created by combining the Hebrew letters, Aleph, Lamed,
Hei) was said about the hidden things, then there is no need to write Eleh, because they, the
planets and their signs, are visible… Eliyahu came and asked me: Master do you know what Mi
(Who) has created Eleh (these) means? I answered ‘these’ are the heavens and their hosts, the
works of the Holy One, blessed be He… And these letters, Aleph, Lamed, and Hei, after being
joined together ascended to the name Elohim, meaning that the letters Mem and Yud,
combined with Aleph, Lamed, and Hei, complete the name Elohim. Furthermore, as long as He
did not create the letters Aleph, Lamed and Hei, they did not rise to form the name Elohim.
Those who sinned in worshipping the Golden Calf used this secret by saying, “Eleh (these are)
your Deities, Yisrael (Shemot 32:4).”
The Zohar is not telling us not to study Astrology in fact it encourages the initiate to do so. Based
upon the above data from the Zohar I take the Hebrew word ‘Eleh” translated ‘these’ to represent the
Zodiac, which has no spiritual knowledge. This is something akin to what is practiced in our twenty-first
century culture. The word ‘Elohym” (Elohim) appears to be a word that has connotations of a spiritual
understanding of Astrology.
In the ‘Cycle of Darkness ’ I have placed the phrase ‘begin and end’ in the eleventh house because it is
derived from the fi rst and last letters of the Hebrew alphabet: Aleph [ א] and Tav [ ת]. These two letters
come together to produce the Hebrew word ‘et’.60
“The particle Et (the) is created by combining the letters Alef
and Tav, which is the first and last letters of the alphabet.
Thus, Et includes all the letters from beginning to end… The
term Et (the) is mentioned before IN: ‘And the Heaven.’ It is
the power of the entire 22 letters, which are hinted at in Et
(Alef-Tav), which is the Alef to Tav.”
It is not because the Zohar says the word, Et represents the Beginning and End, though it is a factor in
my rational, rather it is because of the way this word is dealt with in the sacred scriptures and in the Cycle
of Darkness – A. Here the eleventh house sits at one end of the Heaven and Elohym sits at the other end.
When the text, of the first verse of Genesis, is read with Et in the translation it, both times, reads, “In the
beginning separated Elohym the beginning and end of the heavens and the beginning and end of the
Earth.” When the ‘Cycle of Darkness’ is read with these connotations of Et in mind the same results are
obtained. The onl y trouble is the words ‘Elohym and Bereshith (In the beginning)’ flank the word ‘Earth’.
In both cases the words: ‘Heaven and Earth’ are flanked by words in the first verse of Genesis, which
denotes that the Heaven and the Earth are known from their ‘beginnings to their ends’: however, reading
the first verse of Genesis properly it reads “In the being Elohym separated the beginning and ends of the
heavens and the beginning and ends of the earth”, which is a far more important interpretation than “In
the beginning Elohym separated the heavens and the earth”. The reason for this is that the first verse
literally is inferring the TRINITY. In the second verse the word Elohym is used again and before the first
verse of Genesis it is used. This sounds inane at this point of the texts but I will not get into that aspect of
59 THE ZOHAR (23 vols.) by Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai, with The Sulam commentary of Rabbi Yehuda
Ashlag, Edited and Compiled by Rabbi Michael Berg (Vol. 1 Prologue 11, 12, 14).
60 IBID, (Vol. 1, Beresheet A, 11, 305)
41

my research at this time. There is research on what I call the GENESIS FORMULA which actually
demonstrates that the entire Hebrew alphabet comes into creation and QOPH is the next letter in line to
come into creation and it is the third personality of TRINITY inferred by the first verse of Genesis. If the
word BERESHITH is studied the letter YUD is found, which symbolically represent YAHWEH, which is one
of the three persons of the TRINITY. The world Elohym personifies all three aspects of the TRINITY;
however, this is research already publish and has nothing to do with this immediate article.
This word Et is found twice in the first verse of Genesis but it is never ever translated into other
‘translated languages’ of the sacred scriptures. This word is found 26 -times in the first chapter of Genesis.
The four letters for the Hebrew word Yahweh [ הוהי ]: Yud [ 10 = [י , Heh [ 5 = [ה , Vav [ 6 = [ו , Heh [ 5 = [ה total
to #26, which implies that ET has something to do with Yahweh. The symbolism of this word Et speaks for
itself. I will come back to this word Et again a few more times in the next chapter not only to augment
what I already written about here but because it will be demonstrating that the Hebrew alphabet is a
major motif in the structural aspects of the book of Genesis.
Another important aspect to the ‘Cycle of Darkness ’ is that the word ‘bara’ did not make it into one of
the houses of the Zodiac. The reason for this is obvious. The word, Bara is committed to symbolizing
itself in the positioning of the word Elohym in the cycle. This is a brilliant piece of structuring in these
cycles. There is no wasted space. Every word is being economized. Take the fact that the word Et is
mentioned twice. If it is placed once in the eleventh house of the Zodiac, as seen in the ‘Cycle of
Darkness’ how can it be placed in any other house of the Zodiac in that same cycle? This has to be a
primary mandate in the astrological orientation of words in the sacred scriptures. NO WORD CAN BE
PLACE IN MORE THAN ONE HOUSE OF THE ZODIAC IN ANY GIVEN CYCLE. This is in fact a direct edict from
the sacred scriptures. If a word is repeated more than once in any particular verse it cannot be used again
in another house of the Zodiac in any particular cycle. Essentially the first verse of Genesis is completely
astrologically orientated. Now can the next verse fill in the rest of the ‘Cycle of Darkness ’? Notice that
the word Et is place physically in one house (#11) and symbolically in another house as if to say “as above
so below”.
THE CYCLE OF DARKNESS AND THE CAPRICORN SYMBOL
I was slowly, by trial and error, figuring out this
astrological orientation of scriptural words . I was
instituting, for myself, fast and strict rules as I
progressed and developed method. It was a bit difficult
to determine how to begin in the second verse of
Genesis. But there were three words that I could
rationally orientate without too much thought. There
is an old play on words we often hear concerning, “he’s
six foot under” or “deep six.” So I placed the word
‘deep’ in the six house betting on human nature not
changing since the writing of these documents we call
the sacred scriptures. Saint John tells us in his gospel
“God is a spirit.” So it is not difficult to place God as
spirit in the first house. Whereas, the tenth house
represents ‘darkness’ seeing it is “Capricorn, the goat
that fed the gods.” This is intriguing because the tenth
house sits right next to the sixth house, “darkness was
on the face of the deep.” This is the reason that the
‘Cycle of Darkness’ is so named. Darkness = 10 sits in
42

the first house, which represents, “And Elohym distinguished the Light from the Darkness.”61
The problem that loomed over the text after the placing of the last three words was great because
logic had to dictate my actions in the astrological orientation of the words to the sacred scriptures. How
can I fill in logically the fourth, eighth, fifth, and ninth houses?
43
61 Gen. 1:4;

One of the major paradigms that dominate the text of the first chapter of Genesis is the ‘equal skip
sequence’ (no, not the neo-Bible Code). We will talk about the different examples of this motif as we
continue on into the next chapter of this article. Right now the reader should look at the Cycle of
Darkness and notice the two intertwining cycles that dominate its structure: 1-6 and 7-12. Take a
moment and take cognizant of these two cycles. Both of them begin and end at the opposite sides of the
Cycle of Darkness. This observation will become important in a number of ways as we continue when the
skip sequence is put into play. If you remember how the initial Cycle of Genesis was first developed you
will realize it was founded upon the 6-day creation account. At that time it could not be envisaged that
the 6 days of creation created, in and of themselves, by themselves, their own cycle. As you saw above
the #12 comes into creation, followed by #11, followed by #10, etc. etc. Thus the numbers 12-7 form
their own cycle. What it implies is that the 6 days of creation are leaving the first chapter of Genesis
following another set of 7-12, whereas another 12-7 set (notice I use the reverse) are coming into creation
followed by their own 6-1 set. We will see this same phenomenology in relationship to the 22-letters of
the Hebrew Alphabet in the next chapter. Suffice it to say that when one mathematical device is used in
one pattern it then can be recognized in other patterns, from a totally different perspective, then a major
motif is being illustrated.
Notice how after the ‘Cycle of Darkness ’ was completed the text in the houses of its cycle imitate a
skip sequence. Read the text of the first verse of Genesis and look at the ‘Cycle of Darkness ’. Each word
skips a slice of the pie so-to-speak. This was an intriguing possibility as to how the scriptural text was
astrological orientated and published in the Cycle of Darkness especially when it is seen that the first word
of the second verse begins with the word ‘Earth’. The word ‘Earth’ is the last word of the first verse of
Genesis but the first word of the second verse of Genesis. Since a word cannot be used twice in the same
cycle the same house is used repetitively to continue the text of the sacred scriptures (sacred cycle).
The second verse begins “the earth was ‘without form’ and ‘void’”. Now ‘water’ is ‘without form’. But
what does the sacred scripture mean when it uses the word waters in comparison to what we normally
would call drinking water? The definition for waters as in the ‘waters’ of creation is ‘piss, urine, waste’.
For the Earth therefore to be ‘without form’ is not necessarily this water ; however, it is saturated with
that filth. The number four is a ‘Water Triplicity”, which is a prime candidate for the placement of the
phrase ‘without form’. It meets the skip sequence criteria we notice in the cycle. Notice that skip
sequence worked also with the words ‘deep, darkness and spirit’. I was down to three houses to fill. The
first verse of Genesis has used only five words out of seven in the Cycle of Darkness and in the second
verse we will learn that not all its words are used in the Zodiac positions. But every word is important.
For example, in the phrase “darkness was upon the face of the deep”, we do not have the words ‘upon or
face’ in a particular Zodiac house. They are present in the cycle by the fact that the words ‘darkness and
deep’ are words that are side by side in the text, whi ch meets the criteria of being “upon the face of the
deep.” Many of the words in the sacred scriptures are being used symbolically in the cycles to represent
‘verbs, adjectives, and conjunctive phrases 62’, rather than physically being placed, as nouns, to fill in one
of the twelve slots of a cycle.
The hardest thing for me to grasp was breaking my own doctrinal rules. It occurred to me that the
second day of creation narrates the separation of the ‘waters above the heavens’ from the ‘waters
beneath the heavens’. Was it possible that the houses eight and five represented symbolically both these
aspects of the waters of creation? This was most likely seeing that the word ‘void’ has the connotations
of death and it would have to go to the ninth house. This left the only two houses: eight and five as a gap
between the fourth and ninth houses. In the true sense of the word my rule of no word being used twice
in a cycle was not broken because eventually these two houses eight and five are seen as the ‘waters
62 I was amazed to, personally, have envisaged these nuances especial ly s ince I was a poor s tudent in Engl i sh
composition. I was dealing with the Hebrew texts. I could only imagine at the time that all languages have s imi lar
compos i tional s tructures .
44

above the heavens’ and the ‘waters beneath the heavens’. So in the second verse of Genesis we simply
are recognizing that these two houses are combined as one because there does not appear to be anything
that distinguishes the eighth house from the fifth house. I warn the reader and future researchers that
such anomalies are going to take place in the sacred scriptures but there are always reasons for such
anomalies. I warn the reader that these sleight of hand maneuvers are placed there to be an obstacle to
one’s thought processes as I have already outlined concerning the ‘Lord’s Prayer’: “lead us not into
temptation but deliver us from evil63”. Such anomalies look tempting: ‘to use the same word in more than
one slot of the Zodi ac’. The would-be researcher should work out his thesis completely before he sets
forth such anomalies as fact. There will always be some other researcher out there in the world that will
catch your error if you are not careful and fling it right back into your face. The numbers five and eight
represent a major motif throughout the Genesis text. Notice also that I do not put two words ‘waters’ in
the fifth and eight houses . I use the word ‘waters’ just one time to fill the two houses: so I am still,
technically, not breaking the primary rule of using the same word twice in a cycle.
This completed the astrological orientation of the first and second verses of Genesis to the Cycle of
Darkness. Notice that all the words of these two verses are accounted for in this Cycle of Darkness. There
are actually twenty-one Hebrew words in these two verses but only eleven of those words are used in its
twelve houses. All the other words and phrases are accounted for by other appropriate means as has
already been discussed. This was not the end of my ruminations on this cycle. I pondered it and
continuously tested my hypothesis and could not find any fault with the premise. It was about then that I
revisited the skip sequence and drew a line from one house to another just to see what it would bring me.
The logic for doing this was simple: why would the text demonstrate such a skip pattern sequence unless
there was a reason for it? In the future other will see that any question asked of the text has an answer to
it. I did not know at this time that the #2 (Beth) was the dominant force that controlled the structure of
Genesis. This is the prime reason for the skip pattern sequence and the reason that the two cycles 1-6
and 12-7 are interlaced in the Cycle of Darkness. So I played out my thought process and drew a line
around the Cycle of Darkness connecting all the houses. As I drew the line on the Cycle of Darkness I read
again the text of the first two verses of Genesis. Finishing this continuous line from one house to another
it became all too obvious to me that this drawing was of the Capricorn Symbol: “the goat that fed the
gods.” The phrase “the spirit of God hovered over the face of the waters” is explaining why God is
hovering over the waters. The exoteric (outer garment) could not be distinguished from the esoteric
(inner garment). These waters are the sacred scriptures. The Capricorn symbol is a combination of the
signs of Aries and Leo. It represents spirituality in a container: God within his Temple. Aries represents
the Ram’s horns (the ‘V’ shape) and Leo represents the cup or the unconscious mind (the ‘U’ shape or
crater), which is one of its constellations. Thus the ‘V’ inside the ‘U’ denotes the Capricorn Symbol:
spirituality in a container. Take cognizant of the fact that the letter ‘U’ look very much like the letter BETH
ב] ] in the Hebrew Alphabet. Note that Abraham killed a ram rather than kill his second (Beth) son. Jesus
begged his father, in the Garden of Gethsemane, to take the cup away.
63 I found i t extraordinarily interesting that in the LORD PRAYER the prayer has in the same sentence, “lead us not
into temptation but to deliver us from evil”. Here the suppl icant i s praying that God wi l l not lead him into
tempta tion but i s reques ting that he be del ivered from the very evi l God has tempted him with.
45

THE SPIRIT OF ELOHYM HOVERING
OVER THE FACE OF THE WATERS
The Spirit of Elohym hovering over the waters appears to have another connotation to it, and why the
word ‘hovering’ was used in the text of the
second verse of Genesis. When the phrase
“The Spirit of Elohym was hovering over the
face of the Waters” is contrasted in both
the Cycles of Darkness and Light it is easily
seen what the author is referring to. Here
we have a graphic illustration of what looks
like a little winged dragonfly hovering over
the waters. Anyone that has ever done any
fishing has seen these little winged
creatures just hovering over and above the
surface of the waters. Angels (Elohym) are
said to be little winged creatures. There s imply can be no doubt that this analogy was meant to be grasp
as if Elohym was wavering or ambiguous as to taking a leap into spirituality. The flitting back and forth
between the two cycles of Darkness and Light brings up visions of each progressive step into another cycle
would be just as difficult as the previous cycle was to enter into. This would indicate that each day would
bring up all segments of the Creation Account to be entered into. Here in the first chapter of Genesis all
these various aspects of the Creation Account appear to be separate
days of creation rather than them all being holographically in each
day of creation. The best analogy that I can presently think of is a
person that is arrested for a crime in the United States. The
defendant if innocent literally has to reenact the Revolutionary War
to regain his freedom. This does not appear to be so because of the
alleged rights that is afforded a defendant but become a defendant
and it will not be something to be taken lightheartedly. Kahlil
Gibran64 the modern day New York prophet said, “If you want to see
man’s inhumanity to man, in all its glory, just go sit in a courtroom
for a day”.
The questions, “why is there a new heaven and a new earth
being narrated in the first verse of Genesis?”, “what started the
process” are always in the forefront of thought. Something had to institute the process.
What I noticed as I began to somewhat understand these cycles is that the last cycle in the SCALE OF
DARKNESS is the Cycle of the Sea, which is astrologically orientated by the words of the fifth day of
creation (Gen. 1: 20-23) had the same pattern as “the spirit of Elohym hovering over the face of the
waters”. This pattern in the Cycle of Darkness and the Cycle of Light is similar to a bird with wings and in
the fifth day of creation it says, “Let the birds multiply on the earth (Gen. 1:23)”. Again the initiate has to
pause and ask of the text what are these patterns conveying. The initiate, at all times, has to realize
that the biblical teachings are complete at its inception and it is up to the initiate to work it all out in a
one-on-one relationship with God.
From what I understand, the CYCLE OF DARKNESS was structured with the elements of creation:
Triplicities: Fire, Earth, Air and Water (not the four nuclear forces) and the CYCLE OF THE SEA is
structured using the Quadruplicities: Cardinal, Fixed and Mutable. It is obvious that the CYCLE OF THE
SEA is trying to amalgamate itself to the same concept inherent in the CYCLE OF DARKNESS and
64 Kahlil Gibran http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahlil_Gibran
46

apparently the CYCLE OF THE SEA had accomplished that because of the wording of the fifth day of
creation, which gave the birds permission to multiply on the earth. The Earth is symbolic of the Soul or
the Goddess, which infers the mystical marriage of the Heavens and the Earth that represents the
Mysterium Coniunctionis.
ASTROLOGICALLY ORIENTATING THE CYCLE OF LIGHT
The Cycle of Light is the next cycle in sequence from the Cycle of Darkness. Its numerical sequence is
the same as the traditional cycle of the Zodiac. Astrologically orientating the words from the text of Day
One of Creation becomes easier as we gain more experience in the process. The word ‘Light’ is placed in
the first house because Saint John tells us that “God is Light” as he told us that “God is Spirit”. Since we
have already seen the word ‘Darkness’ in the 10 th-house it can again be placed there. For me the seventh
Day of creation is Hell because it denotes chaos . Therefore it is the offspring of Darkness as is the word
Night. Once that connection is made it is not difficult to orient the word ‘Day’ to the fourth house of the
Cycle of Light (Zodiac).
Notice how Darkness and Light are placed in the appropriate positions to manifest the concept of sine
waves.65 Remember that the sacred scriptures are a mode of communication as are sine waves. The
opposite of light is Darkness and Darkness is 270º from Light. This would place light’s posi tive sign ‘Day’
90º from its position. These rules apply also to the words: ‘Darkness’ and ‘Night’. Being that Night is 90º
from its positive and 270º from its negative: Day. The CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION appear to convey the
idea of continuous sine waves66 throughout the first two chapters of Genesis .
65 DATA COMMUNICATIONS, by Ma ry E. S. Loomis, “A s ine wave is simply a continuous, s moothly ri s i ng a nd fa l l i ng,
re pe ating, cycl ic mathematical curve… There a re 360º i n one cycl e of a wa ve . A wa ve i s a t i ts 0º, 180º, a nd 360º
pos itions where its representative crosses the horizontal axis; i t is at i ts 90º pos i tion at i ts pos i tive peak and 270º
pos itions at its negative peak in relation to the horizontal axis. Information i s carried by changing the frequency,
amplitude, or phase of the carrier wave. The process of imposing digital information on an analog carrier wave i s
cal led modulation. The three fundamenta l modulation techniques are: Ampl itude modulation, Frequency
modul a ti on, a nd Pha s e modul a ti on.” (pg. 57-58)
66 See the illustration given on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_wave
47

Note the concept being conveyed here. Both ‘light’ and ‘darkness’ are being afforded the same
theological connotations from their own individual spheres of thought. They are equal but exist in parallel
universes. Light knows nothing of darkness and darkness knows nothing of light: as in esotericism
knowing nothing of literalism and literalism doesn’t know anything about esotericism. Such blindness is
the curse of humanity. Remember the story of Adam and Eve when Yahweh Elohym said, “Where art
thou Adam?” because they could not be seen: only heard.
This covers just the four signs associated to the Cardinal Quadruplicity: 1-4-7-10. As we study the
words in Day One of Creation we find it is lacking enough words to fill a cycle of 12-parts. It is obvious
that the second day of creation is going to have to be called upon to aid in filling up this Cycle of Light as
the second verse of Genesis was drafted to help complete the Cycle of Darkness. It is as if we are forcibly
being told that the #2 usurps #1 position. Therefore, conceptually #2 represents ‘darkness’, and #1
represents light. This concept is further advanced when the first letter of Genesis: Beth is analyzed.
The words ‘Evening and Morning’ in the first Day of creation were very suggestive of the Evening and
the Morning Star, which are both names for Venus. At this juncture of astrologically orientating words to
the Cycle of Light it was difficult to determine where exactly they would be placed. I had not quite
worked it out because of what the Cardinal Quadruplicities had to say in this cycle about sine waves. One
of the primary clues that would enable me to complete the first day of creation was the word ‘said’ in the
third verse of Genesis. The Hebrew definition would imply something more than just plain speech. It
implied ‘desire’. Mary Baker Eddy in the first chapter of her work: “Science and Health with Key to the
Scriptures”67 writes on the bottom of the first page, “desire is prayer”. Who, or what, would God be
praying to? In Alcoholics Anonymous “the only requirement for membership is a ‘desire’ to stop drinking”.
Some years before I had learned that in order for the Zodiac Cycle to move the sixth house of the Zodiac
had to move first. The reason for this was never given. In fact the ancient Egyptians displayed designs on
the ceiling of the Portico of the Temple of Esneh of the Zodiac going from Virgo round to Leo.68
Apparently it was a universal mandate that Virgo had to move first if the Zodiac was to move at all. Not
that Virgo was the first sign but that it had to move first. I was looking at a chart of the 12-signs, which
illustrated that each sign of the Zodiac has three separate constellations or decans associated with it. The
first decan of Virgo is called ‘COMA’,69 which means ‘desire’ in Hebrew or as some Christian authors have
written “the desire of the ages”. The word ‘said (desire)’ is the first word of the first Day of creation. Was
this the primary mandate of Astrology coming to fruition? Not only have I shown recent organizations
such as Alcoholics Anonymous and Christian Science founded by Mary Baker Eddy conforming
unknowingly to this ancient astrological mandate but the first chapter of Genesis also conformed to it.
This would indicate, because of these recent modern day organizations, that the truths of the sacred
scriptures are written in the lives of every individual. This places a whole new slant on how researchers
should view the teachings of the sacred scriptures. If the academic and religious communities realized
that the human endeavor says symbolically the same things that the ancient sacred scriptures says
esoterically then an analysis of the two sources can be comparatively studied.
This above reasoning would place the word ‘desire’ in the sixth house of the Cycle of Light. The word
‘Elohym’ would be placed in the twelfth house as it was placed there in the Cycle of Darkness. But notice
that the #12 is located in two separated places in these two cycles ; yet, the same word is assigned to it.
This is because it is the location of the number that is important not the position within the cycle. The
position within the Zodiac can give a word-added nuance in the original sign’s position but it cannot take
the basic character of the number from it. It would be like an individual putting on different hats as in the
old nursery rhyme: “rich man, poor man, beggar man, thief, doctor, lawyer, Indian Chief,” it is still the
same person. What is unique here in the Cycle of Light is that Elohym (#12) is 180º from the word ‘desire
67 SCIENCE AND HEALTH with Key to the Scriptures, by Mary Baker Eddy (pg. 1:11)
68 THE WITNESS OF THE STARS, by E.W. Bullinger (pg. #21)
69 IBID (pg. #34), and THE GOSPEL OF THE STARS, by Joseph A. Seiss (pg. 28-29)
48

(#6)’. This would imply that somehow these two words worked in harmony with each other because this
phrase: ‘Elohym said (desired)’ is seen 10-times in the first chapter of Genesis. This was quite different
than how the Cardinal signs dealt with their contraries. The words ‘Evening and Morning’ could then be
placed in the ninth and third houses respectively. These two words are seen in every day of the Creation
Account, which is a total of 6-times. Besides the evening of life is death, which has already been
determined is a representation of the number nine (#9). In Judaism revelation can only come on the third
day and revelation is the dawning of a new ideas. It is interesting that the Mutable Quadruplicities has
these two repetitive phases throughout the first Chapter of Genesis and I believe that this is because the
Mutable signs denote structure: changeable within confined limits as in geometry, which is the third
mathematical science70. The fact that the seventh Day is not narrated in the first chapter makes one
wonder if the phrase: ‘Evening and Morning’, would not have been used a total of 7 -times71. The #3 (third
Quadruplicity) or the Mutable Signs denote structure as in geometry. We will return to this idea of
structure in relationship to Mutable Quadruplici ty at a later time. The Cycle of Light is about as complete
as it is going to be from the first day of creation.
70 Thi s concept of the Mutable signs of the Zodiac symbolizing geometry i s more clearly seen in the structure of the
Universal Mathematical Matrix.
71 In the second chapter of Genesis, i f the reader places close attention to the narrative, it is seen that that there are
two other days being expressed in this one chapter.
49

In the first chapter of Genesis thirty-two (32) the world Elohym is used and they are placed
sequentially into the thirty-one (31) verses of Genesis creating a graphic image of the Kabbalistic Tree of
Life (GRA Tree or Natural Array), which is designed differently than the historical ARI Tree. I, personally,
tend towards the bible interpreting itself;
thereby, superseding all other
interpretations. The Hebrew word
“ELOHYM” is spelt out, Aleph (1), Lemmed
(30), Heh (5), Yud (10) and Mem (40).
When the numbers are reduced to their
lowest common denominators the
sequence is 1-3-5-1-4, which when going
counterclockwise gives the formula for Pi:
i.e. 3.1415; thus, the word ELOHYM is seen
as both simultaneously as a circle and the
formula for pi. A study of the graphic
image above in concert with studying the
first chapter of Genesis will show that the aggregate of thirty-two (32) is five hundred and twenty-eight
(528) and the diameter of said circle is from the third Elohym to the eighteenth Elohym, which gives
aggregate of one hundred and sixty-eight (168), which is the diameter of a circle of five hundred and
twenty-eight (528). The aggregate of the first two verses and from verses twenty to thirty-one (1, 2, 20-
31) is three hundred and sixty (360), which is the degrees in a circle. Coincidentally or deliberate the
number five hundred and twenty-eight (528) have three digits (5-2-8), which alludes to the Fixed
Quadruplicities of Astrology. I bring this out to illustrate that the circle of five hundred and twenty -eight
(528) is a fixed paradigm. The soul that is fixed in his or her niche in life similar to a stone or statue needs
to be active in life. The whole of the five hundred and twenty-eight (528) part circle is representative of
DARKNESS that the LIGHT has to be culled out of. It can be seen that the Elohyms from the third to the
eighteenth symbolize that LIGHT; however, these
Elohym are in the third to the nineteenth verse,
which has total of two hundred and seven (207)
words. The Hebrew word for LIGHT has a
Gematria value of two hundred and seven (207). I
won’t go further here but there is additional
evidence that these first four days of creation:
verses three to nineteen symbolize the LIGHT
divided from the darkness.
50
This is exceedingly important for the reader to
understand. This image of the Vesica Piscis is
brought about through the intersecting of two
circles symbolizing the marriage of heaven and
earth in which it is the central glyph denoting the
Vesica Piscis . The Vesica Piscis symbolizes Christ72:
i.e. the soul (Self). The authors of the sacred scriptures via the revelation from God are tell ing each
person in the material world that his or her true origin is as an angel of God.
72 Thi s image is from the West Portal of Chartres Cathedral. Notice that the four zodiacal images (Bull, Lion, Eagle and
Angel ) creating the Vesica Piscis are from the fixed signs of Astrology. These four fixed signs of As trology represent
the four gospels. The symbolism of the imagery i s quite clear for i t has to cull out the Chri st from the teachings of the
New Tes tament.

I will not discuss the GENESIS FORMULA here other than that it is an extrapolation of the first word of
Genesis: BERESHITH, which is culled out of the Universal Mathematical Matrix: Prima Materia (Perennial
Matrix).
There are many nuances throughout the symbolism in the first chapter of Genesis. For example there
are seventeen (17) verses depicting the LIGHT in verses three to nineteen (3-19); whereas, there are
fourteen (14) verses in the first two verses and from the twentieth to the thirty-first verse (1, 2 and 20-31)
illustrating the first chapter of Genesis is within a circle of its own at least from this particular symbolic
perspective. What this suggest when reducing fourteen (14) and seventeen (17) to their lowest common
denominators five and eight (5 and 8) is that they are representatives of the Gematria values of Elohym
(86 = 5) and Yahweh (26 = 8)73, which, as has already been discussed, are the waters of creation and a set
in the Fibonacci sequence; thus, Yahweh (Sun – ego-consciousness) symbolizes the LIGHT and Elohym
(Moon – unconscious mind) symbolizes the DARKNESS. Here it is seen that there is redundant verification
of the interpretation of biblical symbolism within the very area that the symbol is being displayed.
Scriptures interprets itself. The Vesica Piscis is the mastodon or mound of creation discussed in the third
day of creation. Yahweh and Elohym are seen in the creation process as being in unanimity of thought,
which are thoughts that rises about the waters of creation. These new thoughts create the new Garden
of Eden. This Garden of Eden is in the world but it is not of the world. To assume otherwise is a
misinterpretation of the data presented.
ASTROLOGICALLY ORIENTATING THE CYCLE OF HEAVEN
It is necessary that we enter the second day of creation to obtain the other four words that are
needed to fill in the rest of the Cycle of Light. The second day of creation has more words (38) in it than
the first day of creation (31). It is little nuances like this that can confuse a resea rcher and make him or
her think he or she would be violating the rules. But in this case the only words that can be used out of
the second day of creation are four and no more and they are all orientated to the Fixed Quadruplicity of
the Astrology. All the rest of the words in the second day of creation are accounted for in previous cycles.
It was quite interesting to see that the ‘Firmament’ in the second day of creation would go to the
eleventh house of the Zodiac. The word Heaven has already been allocated to the second house as we
saw in the Cycle of Darkness and the ‘Waters above the Heavens and waters beneath the heavens’ have
been allocated to the “fifth and eighth” houses. This leaves only the word ‘Firmament’ to be dealt with
and the only slot open to it is the eleventh house. Notice also that the lowest common denominator of
number eleven is two: hence the reason for the ‘firmament’ to be called ‘heaven’.
This word ‘Firmament’ is intriguing because it implies that the sun, moon, and stars in the fourth day
of creation are conceptual ideas. We are not talking about the physical sun, moon, and stars. We have
learned in the Cycle of Darkness that house #11 is represented by Et, which represent the Aleph and Tav
(first and last letters: Alpha and Omega) of the Hebrew Alphabet, which implies that the Alpha and Omega
is the firmament. This would mean that the surface area of the text is the Firmament, which blocks out
the heaven, which has the sun, moon, and stars in it. When reading the surface area of the text the
letters are literally not seen. That may sound ludicrous but think about it for a minute. It is the words
that tell the story that are seen, whereas the letters that make up words are treated summarily as being
incidental to the text. It is only when we study the esoteric nature of the text that we see the letters that
make up the words of the sacred scriptures and it is at this time that the sun, moon, and stars are visible
to the initiate. Letters are also seen in the text by the reader via misspellings and by other words not
understood.
73 Some may be interes ted in the fact that Yahweh (26) and Elohym (86) tota l to 112, which i s very important
symbolism. The hieroglyphs found behind the door in the shaft of the Queen Chamber in the Great Pyramid tota led
to 121, which i s a transpos i tion of 112.
51

We saw above that when we viewed the Cycle of Light from the perspective of the Quadruplicities the
Cardinal and Mutable Quadruplicities gave off the same pattern. The Fixed Quadruplicity gave off its own
pattern by being absence from the Cycle. This pattern is played out again in the first and second days of
Creation. But most important the Cycle of Light is actually a combination of the Cycle of Light and the
Cycle of Heaven because it takes in both the first and second days of Creation. These two cycles are
diametrically opposite though the Cycle of Heaven is trying to integrate into the Cycle of Light. The Cycle
of Heaven is desperately trying to integrate into the first day of creation and this is why the first and
second Days of Creation have two cycles rather than one: to graphically illustrate this concept.
In the Cycle of Heaven its most important mission is for the Fixed Quadruplicity to integrate with the
Cardinal and Mutable Quadruplicities, which are not seen in the Cycle of Light. In every sense of the word
this Cycle of Heaven set out in the first day of creation. The example that is given is the #2, which
symbolizes the Fixed Quadruplicities, wedging its signs into the Cycle of Light: in this case the Cycle of
Heaven does merge with the Cycle of Light.
From the calendar’s perspective Aquarius and Capricorn represent January and February, which are
astrologically governed by Saturn, which is known as the Father of Time. This is just another reason that
the first and second days of creation are seen as the merger of two cycles and from that the Vesica Piscis
is created ex nihilo (out of nothing). Once the Vesica Piscis is brought to the four the wording of the
second day of creation all begins to make sense especially when the thirty-two (32) Elohym creating are
seen as symbolizing the Vesica Piscis .
Another very interesting nuance in the Cycle of Heavens seen in the Triplicities’ rendition is by noticing
the numbers in the Cycle of the Heavens are split perfect along the lines of odd and even numbers. In
creating the mirror-imaging of opposites, whereas the odd numbers are over the even numbers the
impression is that the odd numbers are the masculine and even numbers are the feminine. Just so is the
surface exoteric text over the esoteric text. “As above so below or is that as below so above” is actually
brought out here because each of the above Triplicities are mirrored in the below Quadruplicities. It is a
beautiful attempt at merging contraries.
52

Notice the Cycle of Heavens: Triplicities. The earth and the waters are beneath symbolizing that the
earth is without form similar to mud at the bottom of a river bed. Similarly above the sun, moon and stars
are intertwined unrecognizable with the darkness. It is easily seen how the Egyptian got their concept of
studying the stars by viewing the horizon watching for the heliacal rising74 of the stars.
The New Testament’s four gospels 75 by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John is a perfect example of this
above process of the #2 attempting to usurp the place of the #1. Matthew’s gospel represents the Angel,
which occupies the eleventh house of the Zodiac: Air sign, Mark’s gospel represents Leo the Lion, which
occupies the fifth house of the Zodiac: Fire sign, Luke’s gospel represents Taurus the Bull, which occupies
the second house of the Zodiac: Earth sign, and John’s gospel represents the Eagle, which occupies the
eighth house of the Zodiac: Water sign. As much as Chri stianity would like to deify the gospels they
are after all just texts that explain the will of God and his spiritual realm. They can never take the place of
direct communion with God.
ASTROLOGICALLY ORIENTATING THE CYCLE OF EARTH
The next cycle in sequence, which emanates from the ‘Cycle of Heaven,’ is the Cycle of Earth. The first
thing that is noticeable about this Cycle of Earth is that it is separated into the four Triplicities: Earth (2, 6.
10), Water (4, 8, 12), Fire (9, 1, 5), and Air (7, 11, 3). This teaching of the different aspects of Astrology
through the medium of the cycles only goes to illustrate that these cycles of Genesis are valid graphics in
the texts.
It is extraordinarily interesting that I would purchase a volume that would teach me the basics of
Astrology and the subsequent results would be that I would find these very same teachings outlined in the
first chapter of Genesis from out of the Cycle of Genesis I initially envisaged out of the first two chapters
of Genesis. It would tend to influence the reader into believing that what I am seeking is what is being
obtained. But on the other hand it is as if a divine hand was guiding me. If there was not the sequence of
74 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliacal_rising
75 THE CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA, by Robert C. Broderick, and i llustrated by Virginia Broderick, 1976
53

cycles emanating from the Cycle of Darkness such a supposition may well be justified that I was finding
what I set out to find by projecting it there.
Another point on this issue is that the text of the sacred scriptures can be seen to have been
generated from the flow of the cycles beginning with the Cycle of Hell, which generated the Cycle of
Darkness. Each consecutive cycle in sequence is paired with the cycle it generates allowing each cycle to
generate the present, and future texts. I advise the reader to read the scriptural text and each cycle for
its present, past and future texts and in this manner it can be seen how these cycles generates themselves
and each other’s text.
The astrological orientation of the words in the third day of creation to the Cycle of Earth was a bit
more difficult to discern. The astrological orientation of the Cycle of Earth went accordingly: because the
collection of waters under the heavens went onto one place it was obvious that the reference was to the
Water Triplicity (4, 8, 12). All of the Triplicities (Fire, Earth, Air, and Water) were grouped neatly into their
individual categories around the Cycle of Earth. This Cycle of Earth looks very much like a Navajo Sand
Painting.76 The word ‘collection’ goes to the fourth house, which is in the original house #1. Whereas, the
word ‘water beneath’ the heavens goes to eighth house, which is the only one of the two numbers ‘#8
and #5’, which is placed amongst the Water Triplicities. This ultimately makes #5, in the second day of
creation, the ‘waters above’ the heavens, more so because it is a Fire sign. The words ‘heaven and earth’
are respectively placed in their own houses ‘#2 and #3’. The word ‘seed’ is placed in house #11 because
the ‘firmament’ is where the 22-letters of the Hebrew Alphabet reside and they are truly the seeds of all
creation. We saw this in the first verse of Genesis in the Cycle of Darkness.
Darkness, which is the 10th house, takes the word ‘seeding’ because it is in the twelfth house, which i s
the original house of the Elohym (Zodiac), which brings (or seeding) light to the earth. Because the #6 is
90º counter-clockwise from the word ‘waters beneath’ the heavens it is called ‘seas’ because it is positive
sign to the ‘waters beneath’ the heavens. See the Cycle of Light in relationship to the location of the Fixed
Quadruplicities.
Just as we learned that the ‘evening and the morning’ have an affinity to the ‘#9 and #3’ respectively,
in Day One of Creation, the word ‘dry land’ would go to the ninth house seeing ‘Elohym called the dry land
earth’, where the earth is actually sitting in the original ninth house. It is actually called ‘dry land’ because
it is sitting in the original fourth house, which is a Water Triplicity and its water had gone onto the original
first place. Thus the original fourth house was left dry as in ‘dry land’. The word ‘fruit’ has the
connotation of the ‘first fruit of the womb’ and therefore is allocated to the first house. The word ‘tree’
goes to house #7 because of the emphasis it puts on trees. Carl Jung uses a picture of seven females
transmogrifying from a tree state into a human form and thus it was suggestive when I place the world
‘tree’ to the seventh house in this Cycle of Earth.77 The fifth house is the only house not filled and
receives the word ‘herbs’. This completes the Cycle of Earth’s astrological orientation.
There is no doubt in my mind that the ancients that codified esotericism into the sacred scriptures
knew of the four nuclear forces being in synch with the mystical idea of those outer materialistic forces;
however, they probably had other names for them or even the same names. This idea of the dry land
appearing in the third day of creation is the same as the Mound of Creation coming into bei ng. When the
Mound of Creation disappears it brings forth the flood that destroys all humanity. All humanity is in the
midst of their materialist desires that drowns in materialism; whereas, Noah’s Mound of Creation was the
Ark he was guided to build, which eventually God cause the Mound of Creation to rise from the waters.
Humanity can hypothesize all it wants as to the Ice-ages causing both the flood and the recession of the
waters when the earth axis poles were shifted and the Arctic and Antarctic were reestablished on the
76 NAVAHO SANDPAINTING ART, by Eugene Baatsos lani i Joe and Mark Bahti , publ i shed by Treasure Ches t
Publ ications , Inc.
77 Ps ychol ogy a nd Alchemy, by Ca rl G. Jung, pg. 41 “Se ven vi rgins being tra nsformed – Beroalde de Vervi l l , Le Songe
de Pol i phi l e (1600)”.
54

Earth’s new axis poles accumulating miles of glacial snow. It is obvious that the ancient sages euphemized
history into mythology in order to explain the paradigmatic spiritual law of the soul via esoter icism.
ASTROLOGICALLY ORIENTATING THE CYCLE OF THE FIRMAMENT
I found this Cycle of the Firmament quite interesting not only because it followed the Cycle of Earth
that has a distinct pattern of all four Triplicities but because this Cycle of the Firmament also has a distinct
pattern of all four Triplicities. This cycle was just a bit more difficult to discern than the last cycle. To
place ‘lights = luminaries’ in the Firmament of the heavens allowing them to be ‘signs, seasons, days, and
years’ is curious when looking at this cycle. Because the firmament is the eleventh house and the #12 is
sitting in the original eleventh house. The #12 represents symbolically the 12 signs of the Zodiac. Thus the
word ‘signs’ is delegated to that position. There are only four seasons and thus the word ‘seasons’ is
positioned in the fourth house, and there are only 6-days of creation and thus the word ‘seasons’ (which
is plural here) is situated into the sixth house, which is odd seen six is not equivalent to four; however, six
represent seas and seasons symbolically appear apropos here.
55

It was indeed advantageous that both the second and eleventh astrological houses resided in the
original fourth and fifth astrological houses, which are the original abodes of the Moon and Sun
respectively. So by saying that the two great luminaries are placed into the Firmament of the Heavens the
cycle interprets itself and thus the words ‘firmament and heavens’ are located in there numbered
namesakes ’#11 and #2’ respectively where the sun and moon reside.
What this cycle’s mission is is ‘to bring light to the earth’. And it fulfills that mission in one very
spectacular finale. The two great luminaries, through the sun and the moon are nuance in the mere
mentioning of the great luminaries, are two great luminaries that bring light to the earth. But curiously
enough the inference of the sun and moon is a valid one. Yet, it is the Fire Triplicities: 1, 5, and 9 that
represent the two great luminaries that bring light to the earth. The word ‘light’ has already been given
to the #1 and there is no way it can be taken from it. This left the #5 and #9 as signs to reflect the two
great luminaries. The salient point to bring out here is that every one of these three positions of the Fire
Triplicities and the #12 are located on the left side of the cycle. All the Earth Triplicities: 2, 6, and 10, and
the air sign #3 (Earth) are on the right side of the cycle. Notice how the light whether it represented by
the luminaries, light, or signs each reflects on the house 180º from its location. Each of those houses
receiving the light is called the ‘earth’: i.e. Earth Triplicities or the word ‘Earth’. It is a remarkable thing to
see the four Cardinal signs, which now have numbers #4, #10, #8, and #11 holding down those positions,
separate themselves out from the other eight signs by having nothing to do with the light or the earth.
This seems to outright validate my positioning of the words astrologically. Now review the Cycle of Earth
once again but this time read the fourth day of creation: into it and see how the light shines on the earth.
The numbers 2, 6, 10, and 3 (all earth) are seen 180º from the numbers 1, 5, 9, and 12 (all light).
Whereas, in the Cycle of Earth the numbers: 4, 7, 8 and 11 separate into their own pattern.
The esoteric science was never meant for a materialist to gaze upon. The mere fact that it is not seen
and is before your very eyes demonstrates that its basic nature is to hide from those that really don’t
want it nor need it. I do not know anyone that would go out of his way to be with a vulgar individual. This
is the same with the esoteric science. It does not want to be with an idiot either.
There are other points to all these cycles that I will not comment on now seeing I am just introducing
this science and I may have over extended myself in explaining them. If the reader has any knowledge of
astrological lore or classical mythology he may well profit spiritually by studying these cycles accordingly.
I have but tapped the surface of what is here. Many of the points that I will not discuss are too obvious to
go into and the initiate has to be left something to discover for himself. Whatever I have said about these
cycles pales before the volumes left unsaid that can be written on them.
56

I will not go beyond this point because my own probing into to these cycles was initially
curtailed in April 1983 to investigate Dante Alighieri’s La Divina Commedia. I never thought that
I would ever get back to Genesis seeing Dante’s work took a dozen years to fathom and when I
finally found La Divina Commedia core matrix, which is the foundation of Dante’s system, it sent
me right back to Genesis with a renew spirit of investigation. I never really did get back into
these cycles again, until 2003 to publish my second book, which I didn’t probe then too deeply,
and a few months ago, except over the span of year between to discover a nuance in the cycles
here and there.
IN CONCLUSION
The images of the scriptural words, beyond the four day of creation to the end of the second chapter
of Genesis, astrologically orientated to the six additional cycles are found below; however, there will be
no discussion outside of these final remarks. There is only one section of the second chapter that I did not
astrologically orientate its words to a cycle: Gen. 2: 18-20; for I have the feeling that they belong also in
one of the other cycles, possibly the Cycle of Hell. This may very well be another rule concerning the
cycles.
The second chapter of Genesis exudes the image of total eclipse of the sun. This symbolizes the
Astrological sign of Cancer and Leo. This is a separate image of the second chapter of Genesis not
inclusive of the cycles. I mention this because it has everything to do with how the first word of Genesis:
BERESHITH is interpreted. As the reader knows that word has many interpretations. Bereshith can be
seen as the total eclipse of the Sun or the total eclipse of the Moon.
The twelve signs of the Zodiac are in the first six days of creation from Capricorn round to Gemini and
then the seventh day has Cancer and Leo codified to it. The third Chapter symbolizes Virgo using the staff
of Mercury with its two serpents as messengers of the gods and the fourth chapter of Genesis symbolizes
the Scales of Libra and the first two verse of the first chapter symbolize Scorpio and Sagittarius .
The reader now knows my methods and can utilize them to understand my writing and even to
surpass my methods. I assure future researchers I welcome the latter.
Remember also that these cycles are in continuous never -ending sine-waves.
YOURS IN CHRIST,
57

58

59

60

THE CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION & THE UNIVERSAL MATHEMATICAL MATRIX

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (11)

Similar to THE CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION & THE UNIVERSAL MATHEMATICAL MATRIX (20)

More from William John Meegan (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

THE CYCLES OF DIVINE CREATION & THE UNIVERSAL MATHEMATICAL MATRIX