SlideShare a Scribd company logo
American Government   Chapter 14 The Judiciary
The Federal Courts:  Least Dangerous Branch or Imperial Judiciary?
Core of the Analysis The Supreme Court's power  of judicial review makes it a lawmaking body. Judges have political goals and policy preferences. The three dominant influences shaping Supreme Court decisions are the philosophies and attitudes of the members of the Court, the solicitor general's control over cases involving the government, and the pattern of cases that come before the Court. The role and power of the federal courts, particularly the Supreme Court, have been significantly strengthened and expanded  in the last fifty years.
Dispute Resolution The United States is a litigious society, with 25 million cases per year (one for every nine citizens.) U.S. citizens are ready to use courts  for all purposes. Court is a forum for social conflict in which a case's facts are established, punishment is handed out to violators, and compensation is awarded to victims. Court is an institution that engages in fact-finding and judgment. Courts interpret rules (statutes or judicial principles) to dispose of cases.
table 8.1
Adversarial Process Accused party is innocent until proven guilty Accused has right to trial by jury of peers  Juries bring community values to bear in a trial.
From the Least Dangerous Branch  to the Imperial Judiciary? Courts influence our decisions  and actions on a daily basis The Constitution guarantees the following:  The right to burn the flag (freedom of speech) The right to sacrifice animals  during a religious ritual (freedom of religion) Minorities cannot be excluded from society (equal protection) Women have a right to an abortion  (right to privacy)
Constitutional Basis of Judiciary Article III, Section 1: Judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and inferior courts that Congress may ordain Judges shall hold their offices during good behavior (for life) Section 2: Jurisdiction: power shall extend to all cases arising under the Constitution, laws of the United States, treaties made Original jurisdiction: cases involving states, ambassadors Trial by jury Section 3: Treason, Proof, and Punishment Conviction on treason requires two witnesses
Judicial Process Common Law  Civil law: "private law" involves disputes  between citizens or between government  and a citizen where no crime is alleged Criminal law: arises out of actions  that violate laws protecting health, safety, and morals of the community.  (mostly in state courts)  Public law  Constitutional law  Administrative law: disputes over statutory authority, jurisdiction, or procedures of administrative agencies.
Original Jurisdiction Courts are responsible for discovering the facts  in a controversy in order to create a record upon which a judgment is based. Federal Jurisdiction Fraction of total cases tried  (266,000 out of 25 million) Lower Federal Courts Trial courts of general jurisdiction Grand jury  Federal agencies are equivalent  to lower federal courts.
Appellate Courts 10 percent of federal cases Consist of more than one judge (usually three) Only rule on matters of procedure,  no new evidence may be presented No cases can originate in Appeals Court
Supreme Court Highest court in the land Judicial review is the power and obligation  to review any lower court decision  where public law is involved. Established by  Marbury v. Madison  (1803) Chief Justice John Marshall established and championed this Court power. Supremacy Clause: federal decisions  are superior to the states Writ of  certiorari : grants cases  to be heard at the Supreme Court  Four justices are required for a writ to be granted
figure 8.1
Character of the Supreme Court The Nine Justices  Chief Justice William Rehnquist (Nixon/Reagan) Stephen G. Breyer (Clinton) Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Clinton) Anthony Kennedy (Reagan) Sandra Day O'Connor (Reagan) Anonin Scalia (Reagan) David Souter (George H. Bush) Clarence Thomas (George H. Bush) John Paul Stevens (Ford)
table 8.2
Appointees Appointed by the president  Generally prominent or politically  active members of the legal profession Usually suggested by a Senator  from a state with vacant seats- Senatorial Courtesy Ideological views are similar  to the president's views
Influences on Decisions  Members themselves  Politics of the day reflect decisions made  (same Constitution) Original intent  Facts Judicial activism: Court goes beyond the Constitution to consider broader societal implications of the case Judicial restraint: strictly interprets  the case according to the Constitution A case must have standing to be considered.
Judges are Legal Professionals They draw fixed salaries and benefits  that are independent of effort, quality of work,  or performance. Judges undergo a thorough screening process  by the political authorities that nominate and confirm them. Opportunity for advancement is limited,  but judges invest in their jobs by their desire  for popularity, prestige, and reputation.
Courts as Coordination Mechanisms Courts serve as coordination mechanisms  to prevent legal disputes before they begin. Given previous court decisions, private parties  can anticipate rulings and coordinate their actions in advance of possible disputes. Example: A prospective embezzler may think twice before committing a crime if he understands the court’s response. The courts provide incentives and disincentives  for specific actions.
Rule Interpretation  Rule interpretation is the single most  important thing the courts do  Judges engage in interpretative activity  by determining what statutes or judicial  principles mean Interpretation is required because laws are not always clear or easily applied to all situations. Courts also interpret the Constitution  to determine the laws’ scope and content Because of this interpretative activity,  the courts engage in  de facto  lawmaking.
Supreme Court Procedures Preparation: briefs are filed  by both sides and interested parties (amici curiae - friends of the court) Oral argument: each side presents  its case in just thirty minutes Conference: justices discuss case and decide Opinion writing: assigned by chief justice,  opinion sets precedent for future cases Dissent: expresses irritation and disagreement  with an outcome Concurrent opinion- agree with decision but for different reasons
Justice Department (Solicitor General): Third-Ranking Person in the Justice Department Top government lawyer in almost  all cases before the appellate courts  Screens cases before  they approach Supreme Court Decides which cases the government should ask the Supreme Court to review and what position the government should take before the Supreme Court Can submit  amicus curiae : friend of the court brief; offers an opinion to the Supreme Court
Limitations on the Courts Courts were constrained by judicial rules  of standing to limit access to the bench. Courts were limited in type of relief  they could provide (only to individuals). Courts lacked enforcement powers of their own and relied on executive branch to ensure compliance. Federal judges are appointed by the president  Congress has the power to change size  and jurisdiction of the courts
Judicial Revolutions Substantive in judicial policy Court was at forefront of sweeping changes  in society Desegregation, rights of accused, reapportionment Changes in judicial procedures

More Related Content

PPT
The Judicial Branch
ODP
Judicial branch
PPT
The Judicial Branch
PPTX
Legislative process
DOCX
Separation of Morality and Law
PPTX
The United States Court System
PDF
HISTORY OF USA NOTES for CSS.pdf
PPTX
Structure and function of parliament
The Judicial Branch
Judicial branch
The Judicial Branch
Legislative process
Separation of Morality and Law
The United States Court System
HISTORY OF USA NOTES for CSS.pdf
Structure and function of parliament

What's hot (20)

PPTX
State executive
PPTX
Ayush evidence law
PDF
Proper Law of the Contract - Conflict of Laws
PPT
Organization Of U.S. Court System
PPT
The Judicial Branch
PPT
Liberalism and Marxism
PDF
PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW I
PPTX
US political system
PPTX
Investment treaties: What they are and why they matter
PPTX
The Australian Legal System
PPTX
How congress is organized
PPT
US Government
PPTX
Understanding Equity and Common Law
PPT
Judicial Branch
PPTX
Us constitution
ODP
Chapter 8 government
PPT
Elections and Campaigns
PPT
The Monarch
PPT
Unit 3 Forms Of Government Types Powerpoint.Cm
PPTX
Congressional committees
State executive
Ayush evidence law
Proper Law of the Contract - Conflict of Laws
Organization Of U.S. Court System
The Judicial Branch
Liberalism and Marxism
PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW I
US political system
Investment treaties: What they are and why they matter
The Australian Legal System
How congress is organized
US Government
Understanding Equity and Common Law
Judicial Branch
Us constitution
Chapter 8 government
Elections and Campaigns
The Monarch
Unit 3 Forms Of Government Types Powerpoint.Cm
Congressional committees
Ad

Similar to The Judicial Branch (20)

PPT
Chapter 9 The Judiciary
PPTX
Federal Courts in American Politics for university students
PPT
The federal court_system
PPTX
The us federal court system & supreme court
PPT
Federal judiciary
PPTX
Courts
PPTX
The Judicial Branch
PPTX
United States Supreme Court
PPTX
American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
PPT
Federal judiciary
PPT
Legislative Politics Chapters 12 - 14
PPT
The Federal Court System
DOCX
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docx
PPTX
Judicial Branch Intro
PPT
Judiciary
PPT
ap gov chap 16
PPTX
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
PPT
The Federal Judiciary
PPTX
Ap government the_federal_court_system_review
PPTX
AP Review
Chapter 9 The Judiciary
Federal Courts in American Politics for university students
The federal court_system
The us federal court system & supreme court
Federal judiciary
Courts
The Judicial Branch
United States Supreme Court
American Government: A Complete Coursebook - Chapter 13
Federal judiciary
Legislative Politics Chapters 12 - 14
The Federal Court System
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docx
Judicial Branch Intro
Judiciary
ap gov chap 16
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
The Federal Judiciary
Ap government the_federal_court_system_review
AP Review
Ad

More from rcambou (20)

PPT
Pub Pol
PPT
AP_Unit2
PPT
Causes French Rev
PPT
Am Rev
PPT
Democracy Review
PPT
Napoleon Chart Maps
PPT
Wilson Ch13
PPT
1 Eval Ev W H
PPT
American Political Culture
PPT
Bureaucracy
PPT
The Media
PPT
To What Ends
PPT
Political Parties
PPT
Political Participation
PPT
Interest Groups
PPT
Political Culture
PPT
Federalism
PPT
Congress
PPT
Who Governs
PPT
Elections and Campaigns
Pub Pol
AP_Unit2
Causes French Rev
Am Rev
Democracy Review
Napoleon Chart Maps
Wilson Ch13
1 Eval Ev W H
American Political Culture
Bureaucracy
The Media
To What Ends
Political Parties
Political Participation
Interest Groups
Political Culture
Federalism
Congress
Who Governs
Elections and Campaigns

The Judicial Branch

  • 1. American Government Chapter 14 The Judiciary
  • 2. The Federal Courts: Least Dangerous Branch or Imperial Judiciary?
  • 3. Core of the Analysis The Supreme Court's power of judicial review makes it a lawmaking body. Judges have political goals and policy preferences. The three dominant influences shaping Supreme Court decisions are the philosophies and attitudes of the members of the Court, the solicitor general's control over cases involving the government, and the pattern of cases that come before the Court. The role and power of the federal courts, particularly the Supreme Court, have been significantly strengthened and expanded in the last fifty years.
  • 4. Dispute Resolution The United States is a litigious society, with 25 million cases per year (one for every nine citizens.) U.S. citizens are ready to use courts for all purposes. Court is a forum for social conflict in which a case's facts are established, punishment is handed out to violators, and compensation is awarded to victims. Court is an institution that engages in fact-finding and judgment. Courts interpret rules (statutes or judicial principles) to dispose of cases.
  • 6. Adversarial Process Accused party is innocent until proven guilty Accused has right to trial by jury of peers Juries bring community values to bear in a trial.
  • 7. From the Least Dangerous Branch to the Imperial Judiciary? Courts influence our decisions and actions on a daily basis The Constitution guarantees the following: The right to burn the flag (freedom of speech) The right to sacrifice animals during a religious ritual (freedom of religion) Minorities cannot be excluded from society (equal protection) Women have a right to an abortion (right to privacy)
  • 8. Constitutional Basis of Judiciary Article III, Section 1: Judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and inferior courts that Congress may ordain Judges shall hold their offices during good behavior (for life) Section 2: Jurisdiction: power shall extend to all cases arising under the Constitution, laws of the United States, treaties made Original jurisdiction: cases involving states, ambassadors Trial by jury Section 3: Treason, Proof, and Punishment Conviction on treason requires two witnesses
  • 9. Judicial Process Common Law Civil law: "private law" involves disputes between citizens or between government and a citizen where no crime is alleged Criminal law: arises out of actions that violate laws protecting health, safety, and morals of the community. (mostly in state courts) Public law Constitutional law Administrative law: disputes over statutory authority, jurisdiction, or procedures of administrative agencies.
  • 10. Original Jurisdiction Courts are responsible for discovering the facts in a controversy in order to create a record upon which a judgment is based. Federal Jurisdiction Fraction of total cases tried (266,000 out of 25 million) Lower Federal Courts Trial courts of general jurisdiction Grand jury Federal agencies are equivalent to lower federal courts.
  • 11. Appellate Courts 10 percent of federal cases Consist of more than one judge (usually three) Only rule on matters of procedure, no new evidence may be presented No cases can originate in Appeals Court
  • 12. Supreme Court Highest court in the land Judicial review is the power and obligation to review any lower court decision where public law is involved. Established by Marbury v. Madison (1803) Chief Justice John Marshall established and championed this Court power. Supremacy Clause: federal decisions are superior to the states Writ of certiorari : grants cases to be heard at the Supreme Court Four justices are required for a writ to be granted
  • 14. Character of the Supreme Court The Nine Justices Chief Justice William Rehnquist (Nixon/Reagan) Stephen G. Breyer (Clinton) Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Clinton) Anthony Kennedy (Reagan) Sandra Day O'Connor (Reagan) Anonin Scalia (Reagan) David Souter (George H. Bush) Clarence Thomas (George H. Bush) John Paul Stevens (Ford)
  • 16. Appointees Appointed by the president Generally prominent or politically active members of the legal profession Usually suggested by a Senator from a state with vacant seats- Senatorial Courtesy Ideological views are similar to the president's views
  • 17. Influences on Decisions Members themselves Politics of the day reflect decisions made (same Constitution) Original intent Facts Judicial activism: Court goes beyond the Constitution to consider broader societal implications of the case Judicial restraint: strictly interprets the case according to the Constitution A case must have standing to be considered.
  • 18. Judges are Legal Professionals They draw fixed salaries and benefits that are independent of effort, quality of work, or performance. Judges undergo a thorough screening process by the political authorities that nominate and confirm them. Opportunity for advancement is limited, but judges invest in their jobs by their desire for popularity, prestige, and reputation.
  • 19. Courts as Coordination Mechanisms Courts serve as coordination mechanisms to prevent legal disputes before they begin. Given previous court decisions, private parties can anticipate rulings and coordinate their actions in advance of possible disputes. Example: A prospective embezzler may think twice before committing a crime if he understands the court’s response. The courts provide incentives and disincentives for specific actions.
  • 20. Rule Interpretation Rule interpretation is the single most important thing the courts do Judges engage in interpretative activity by determining what statutes or judicial principles mean Interpretation is required because laws are not always clear or easily applied to all situations. Courts also interpret the Constitution to determine the laws’ scope and content Because of this interpretative activity, the courts engage in de facto lawmaking.
  • 21. Supreme Court Procedures Preparation: briefs are filed by both sides and interested parties (amici curiae - friends of the court) Oral argument: each side presents its case in just thirty minutes Conference: justices discuss case and decide Opinion writing: assigned by chief justice, opinion sets precedent for future cases Dissent: expresses irritation and disagreement with an outcome Concurrent opinion- agree with decision but for different reasons
  • 22. Justice Department (Solicitor General): Third-Ranking Person in the Justice Department Top government lawyer in almost all cases before the appellate courts Screens cases before they approach Supreme Court Decides which cases the government should ask the Supreme Court to review and what position the government should take before the Supreme Court Can submit amicus curiae : friend of the court brief; offers an opinion to the Supreme Court
  • 23. Limitations on the Courts Courts were constrained by judicial rules of standing to limit access to the bench. Courts were limited in type of relief they could provide (only to individuals). Courts lacked enforcement powers of their own and relied on executive branch to ensure compliance. Federal judges are appointed by the president Congress has the power to change size and jurisdiction of the courts
  • 24. Judicial Revolutions Substantive in judicial policy Court was at forefront of sweeping changes in society Desegregation, rights of accused, reapportionment Changes in judicial procedures