16
Most read
17
Most read
18
Most read
Tolerance Range in Transfer Pricing
CA. Divakar Vijayasarathy
Credits and Acknowledgments
Bharathi Priya R D
Jugal Gala
Legends Used in the Presentation
ALP Arm’s Length Price
CG Central Government
CUP Comparable Uncontrolled Price
RPM Resale Price Method
CPM Cost Plus Method
PSM Profit Split Method
TNMM Transaction Net Margin Method
PLI Profit Level Indicator
Presentation Schema
Transfer Pricing
Arm’s Length
Price
Tolerance Range
Applicability of
Tolerance Range
Range Concept
and Multi Year
Data
Rationale and
Applicability -
Range Concept
Multi Year Data
Notified
Tolerance Range
History of
Tolerance Range
Notified
Illustration
Global
Perspective
Recent
Announcements
(20.09.2019)
Transfer Pricing
Pricing between Associated Enterprise (AEs) or related parties
Special relationship between the parties influencing the price
Controlled transaction and price differs from market rate
Arm’s Length Price – Sec 92C
Methods in determining ALP
Comparable
Uncontrolled Price
Method (CUP)
Resale Price
Method (RPM)
Cost Price
Method (CPM)
Profit Split
Method (PSM)
Transactional Net
Margin Method
(TNMM)
Any Other
Method
It is the Fair price that would be charged in a transaction without the influence of a related party
Tolerance Range
Variation (both positive and negative) between the ALP and the price at which the transaction has actually
been undertaken does not exceed such percentage as may be notified, then actual transaction price shall be
deemed to be the arm's length price
The CG has the power to notify the tolerance limit applicable for every AY in determining ALP – Sec 92C(2)
In exercise of the powers given, CG has notified the tolerance range applicable for AY 2019-20 on 13th
September, 2019
Applicability of Tolerance Range
• Tolerance Range is allowed only if range concept could not be used (number of
comparables being less than 6) and arithmetic mean has been used to justify the
transaction
Applicability
There has to be minimum of 6 comparables for the purpose of applying range concept
Range concept cannot be applied to sectors like shipping, oil and gas, etc. where the comparables
accepted are generally below 6 in number and will have to resort to the same old arithmetic mean and
use of tolerance band, if required, for determination of ALP
Range Concept and Multi Year Data
The Government has notified “Range Concept” and “Use of Multi Year Data” on 20th October, 2015
Objective To reduce litigation on Transfer Pricing issues
Applicability
For International transactions and specified domestic transactions
undertaken on or after 1st April, 2014
Range Concept - for determining ALP in transfer pricing
Use of Multi Year Data - for undertaking comparability
analysis by using weighted average in transfer pricing
Purpose
Rationale – Range Concept
• Where more than one price is determined by the most appropriate method, the
ALP shall be taken to be arithmetical mean of such price
• The use of arithmetical mean for determination of ALP is a unique feature of
Indian transfer pricing regime introduced in 2002
• This was necessitated on account of lack of publicly available data in respect of
comparables
Concept of
Arithmetic
Mean
• Internationally, most countries employ a “range” concept for determination of
ALP where more than one price is determined
• To align Indian transfer pricing rules with Internationally accepted principles,
“Range Concept” was introduced
Rationale for
introducing
Range Concept
Concept of arithmetic mean shall also continue to apply in case where the number
of comparables is inadequate and range concept cannot be used
Range Concept - Applicability
Transaction price shown by the taxpayers falling within the range will be accepted and no transfer pricing
adjustments shall be made
An arm’s length range (arranged in ascending order) beginning from the thirty-fifth percentile of the dataset
and ending on the sixty-fifth percentile shall be considered
A minimum of 6 comparables would be required in the dataset for applying the concept of range
The use of range concept, being a statistical tool, enhances the reliability of analysis undertaken for
computation of ALP
Multi Year Data
Thus, Indian regulations were amended to allow the use of multiple-year data, which is in line with
international guidance and best practices across the globe
Current year data may not be available at the time when documentation is prepared
Further, prices are generally set based on the past year’s data
This created significant issues for taxpayer, because some industries may be cyclical
Provided multi year data can be used if the taxpayer can provide evidence that the data for the prior years has
a bearing on the transfer price
Earlier, Income Tax Rules required that the data to be used for determining an ALP compulsorily must pertain
to the year in which the international transaction is entered into
Notified Tolerance Range – Notification No. SO
3272 (E) [NO.64/2019 (F.NO.500/1/2014-APA-II]
Tolerance Range Applicable for AY 2019-20
Nature of Assessee’s Business Tolerable Range for Variation
Wholesale trade 1% of actual transaction price
In any other case 3% of actual transaction price
Wholesale Trading
in goods
International
transaction or
Specified Domestic
Transaction (SDT)
Average monthly closing
inventory of such goods is
<=10% of sales pertaining to
such trading activities
Purchase cost of finished
goods (FG) is >=80% of the
total cost pertaining to such
trading activities
And
History of Tolerance Range Notified
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
AY 2012-13 AY 2013-14 AY 2014-15 AY 2015-16 AY 2016-17 AY 2017-18 AY 2018-19 AY 2019-20
Wholesale Retail
Tolerance Range has not been changed from AY 2013-14 and it applies for both International Transaction and
Specified Domestic Transaction
Tolerance Range for AY 2012-13 applies only for International Transaction
Cases where Arithmetic Mean can be Used
The dataset consists of < 6 comparables
The Most Appropriate Method considered for determination of the ALP is ‘Profit Split Method or ‘Any
Other Method’
Most Appropriate Method Situation(s)
CUP
No. of comparables less than 6
CPM
RPM
TNMM
PSM Any number of comparables
Any Other Method
Illustration – Tolerance Range
A Ltd.
Indian Company
Software
development
business
B Inc.
UK Company (AE)
Subsidiary
Software
Development Services
While using TNMM, 4 comparable companies have been identified to have undertaken the
comparable uncontrolled transaction in the current year, similar to A Ltd. The Profit level
Indicator (PLI) to be used is the operating profit (OP) to operating revenue (OR)
The data of operating profit and operating revenue for 4 comparable companies for current
year as well as 2 preceding years is available
Provides
Contd.
Sl. No. Name of the
Comp-any
Current year Year 1
(immediately
preceding year)
Year 2
(year before immediately
preceding year)
Aggregation of
OR and OP
Weighted Average
(OP/ OR)
1 B Ltd OP= 75
OR=600
OP= 35
OR=300
OP= 58
OR=450
OP= 168
OR=1350
12.44%
2 C Ltd OP= 25
OR= 400
OP=15
OR=267
OP= 21
OR=350
OP= 61
OR= 1017
6.00%
3 D Ltd OP= 127
OR= 1200
OP=45
OR=576
OP= 82
OR=800
OP= 254
OR=2576
9.86%
4 E Ltd OP= 79
OR= 800
OP=34
OR=209
OP= 51
OR=500
OP= 164
OR=1509
10.87%
Rs. in crores
ALP using Arithmetic mean = (12.44%+6.00%+9.86%+10.87%)/4
=9.79%
Range Concept cannot be applied as the method for determining ALP is TNMM and
number of comparables are less than 6, hence, arithmetic mean has been used
Let us confirm whether the transaction falls within the tolerance range as specified
Contd.
Case 1 Case 2
Actual PLI for A Ltd = 9.51% Actual PLI for A Ltd = 6.32%
3% tolerance range is
applicable
3% tolerance range is
applicable
Within the tolerance range Outside the tolerance range
No adjustments Adjustment of 2.47%
(9.79%-6.32%) shall be
made to the transaction
price
As the transaction does not pertains to wholesale trade, tolerance range of 3% shall be applicable
It shall be noted that here the comparison was of two percentages and hence the actual PLI was
compared within the tolerance range percentage
In cases where ALP and actual transaction is determined in absolute terms, the tolerance range
percentage needs to be applied on transaction value and then confirm whether it falls within the range
Illustration – Wholesale Trading
Average monthly closing
inventory of Product G
Rs. 20 Lakhs
[10% of less of 21 Crores] Cost of purchase of Product G
Rs. 18 Crores
[more than 80% of Total cost]
Would be considered
as ‘Wholesale Trading’
B Ltd
USA
A Traders Ltd
India
Associated enterprises
International transaction
Value : Rs 21 Crores
Total Cost : Rs 20 Crores
Only Trading Activity, Sells Product G
Global Perspective
Country Tolerance Band Prescribed
Sri Lanka 3%
Czech Republic 3% to 7% to low value intra-group
services
Ecuador The tax incurred is > 3% of total taxable
income
Australia No tolerance range
Canada No tolerance range
Recent Announcements by Honourable
Finance Minister (20.09.2019)
Corporate tax reduction - proposal to reduce tax rate for domestic company from existing 30% to 22% subject to
condition that such company is not availing of any exemption or incentive
Special rate for manufacturing companies –
• proposal to slash the corporate tax rate for new companies engaged in manufacturing from existing 25% to
15%
• benefit of reduced tax rate shall be available to companies incorporated on or after October 1, 2019 which
don't avail of any exemption/incentive and would commence their production on or before March 31, 2023
Companies can opt for concessional tax regime after expiry of tax holiday
• Companies which do not opt for the concessional tax regime and avail the tax exemption/incentive shall
continue to pay tax at the pre-amended rate
• However, those companies can opt for the concessional tax regime after expiry of their tax holiday/exemption
period
• After the exercise of the option they shall be liable to pay tax at the rate of 22% and option once exercised
cannot be subsequently withdrawn
Contd.
MAT isn't leviable on companies availing concessional tax rate (22% rate)
MAT rate reduced
• Rate of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) has been reduced from existing 18.5% to 15%
Withdrawal of enhanced surcharge
• It has been proposed that enhanced surcharge introduced by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 shall not apply
to capital gains arising on sale of equity shares in a company or a unit of an equity oriented fund or a unit
of a business trust liable for securities transaction tax, in the hands of an individuals, HUF, AOP, BOI and
AJP.
• Further, the enhanced surcharge shall also not apply to capital gains arising on sale of any security
including derivatives, in the hands of Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs)
No buy-back tax on listed Cos that have made a public announcement of buy-back of shares before July 5, 2019
Expansion of scope of spending of CSR funding; now CSR can be spent on Government aided research
institutes, IITs, etc.
Thank You
DVS Advisors LLP
India-Singapore-London-Dubai-Malaysia-Africa
www.dvsca.com
Copyrights © 2019 DVS Advisors LLP

More Related Content

PPTX
Registration under GST Law
PPTX
TDS 194C.pptx
PDF
Anti Profiteering Measure under GST
PPT
Transfer Pricing Regulations in India
PPTX
TDS OVERVIEW FOR FY 2019-20
PDF
Vietnam Accounting Standards - VAS 10 Effects of changes in foreign exchange ...
PPTX
Registration under GST Law
TDS 194C.pptx
Anti Profiteering Measure under GST
Transfer Pricing Regulations in India
TDS OVERVIEW FOR FY 2019-20
Vietnam Accounting Standards - VAS 10 Effects of changes in foreign exchange ...

What's hot (20)

PDF
BEPS 2.0
PDF
TDS rate in Bangladesh for the FY 20-21 in comparison with FY 19-20 and regul...
PPTX
Accounting and Income Tax Aspects - Demerger
PPTX
Multilateral instrument (mli) treaty abuse [articles 6-11]
PPTX
Income Tax Provisions related to Taxation of Non-Resident Indians
PPTX
House Rent Allowance
PDF
Time of supply
PPTX
World Trade Organisation ( WTO )
DOCX
Inter se Transfer of Shares under SEBI (SAST) Regulations, 2011
PPTX
Slump sale under companies act, 2013
PPTX
TDS 194C & 194I
PPTX
GST registration.pptx
PPTX
Input Tax Credit - ITC
PPTX
Uk tax system
PPTX
Double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA)
PDF
Deposits under companies act 2013 version 5.0
PPTX
Tds provisions [income tax act, 1961]
PPTX
Assessement of companies
PDF
PPTX
International Taxation
BEPS 2.0
TDS rate in Bangladesh for the FY 20-21 in comparison with FY 19-20 and regul...
Accounting and Income Tax Aspects - Demerger
Multilateral instrument (mli) treaty abuse [articles 6-11]
Income Tax Provisions related to Taxation of Non-Resident Indians
House Rent Allowance
Time of supply
World Trade Organisation ( WTO )
Inter se Transfer of Shares under SEBI (SAST) Regulations, 2011
Slump sale under companies act, 2013
TDS 194C & 194I
GST registration.pptx
Input Tax Credit - ITC
Uk tax system
Double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA)
Deposits under companies act 2013 version 5.0
Tds provisions [income tax act, 1961]
Assessement of companies
International Taxation
Ad

Similar to Tolerance range in transfer pricing (20)

PPTX
Practical Issues in Transfer Pricing
PDF
CBDT Representation - Range concept & Multiple year data usage - PRB CAs
PDF
Transfer Pricing Methods _ An Article by Taxpert Professionals
PPTX
OGE Lecture 2 Transfer Pricing - Prof Oyedokun.pptx
PDF
Transfer Pricing
PPTX
Case Law DCIT V Roche DignosticsIndia
PPTX
TRANSFER PRICING
PPTX
Transfer pricing a bird's eye view
PDF
Transfer pricing bsr_co
DOCX
Pricing decision report with introduction to conclusion
PDF
Transfer-pricing-Basics.pdf
PPTX
Profit and loss for class 6
PDF
The Ultimate Guide to Transfer Pricing Methods for Business Success
PDF
Marginal costing -_final_module
PDF
Transfer Pricing Vikram Sankhala
PPS
Accounting Economics And Business 11 Nov Ii
PDF
Losses/Low profits- Transfer Pricing Perspective
PDF
Losses & Low profits- A Transfer Pricing perspective
PDF
Notification on Range and Multiple year Data- Flowchart
Practical Issues in Transfer Pricing
CBDT Representation - Range concept & Multiple year data usage - PRB CAs
Transfer Pricing Methods _ An Article by Taxpert Professionals
OGE Lecture 2 Transfer Pricing - Prof Oyedokun.pptx
Transfer Pricing
Case Law DCIT V Roche DignosticsIndia
TRANSFER PRICING
Transfer pricing a bird's eye view
Transfer pricing bsr_co
Pricing decision report with introduction to conclusion
Transfer-pricing-Basics.pdf
Profit and loss for class 6
The Ultimate Guide to Transfer Pricing Methods for Business Success
Marginal costing -_final_module
Transfer Pricing Vikram Sankhala
Accounting Economics And Business 11 Nov Ii
Losses/Low profits- Transfer Pricing Perspective
Losses & Low profits- A Transfer Pricing perspective
Notification on Range and Multiple year Data- Flowchart
Ad

More from DVSResearchFoundatio (20)

PPTX
ODI DRAFT REGULATIONS
PPTX
SCRAPPING OF RETRO TAX PROVISIONS : A REVIVAL OF OVERSEAS INTEREST IN INDIA
PPTX
INCORPORATING A COMPANY IN DUBAI MAINLAND
PPTX
Key Takeaways: - Analysis of section 45(4), section 9B of the Income Tax Act...
PPTX
WITHHOLDING ON GRATUITY PAYMENT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PPTX
DISALLOWANCE U/S 14A
PPTX
FALLACIOUS DISREGARDING OF TRANSACTIONS THAT RESULT IN A TAX BENEFIT TO THE A...
PPTX
ALLOWABILITY OF OUTSTANDING INTEREST CONVERTED INTO DEBENTURES AS AN EXPENSE ...
PPTX
DENIAL OF EXEMPTION U/S 10(23C)
PPTX
CANCELLATION OF REGISTRATION OF TRUST U/S 12AA
PPTX
Advance tax liability when tds not deducted
PPTX
PPTX
How to make an application for SME IPO listing?
PDF
What are the post listing compliance norms for SME entities?
PPTX
What are the steps to be taken after issue by SME?
PPTX
What are the steps to be taken prior to SME listing?
PPTX
What are the criteria for SME listing?
PPTX
TAXATION OF MNCs – HEADING TOWARDS A RESOLUTION
PPTX
INCORPORATING A COMPANY IN SINGAPORE BY AN INDIAN
PPTX
AUTOMATIC VACATION OF STAY GRANTED BY TRIBUNALDCIT v. PEPSI FOODS LTD. [2021]...
ODI DRAFT REGULATIONS
SCRAPPING OF RETRO TAX PROVISIONS : A REVIVAL OF OVERSEAS INTEREST IN INDIA
INCORPORATING A COMPANY IN DUBAI MAINLAND
Key Takeaways: - Analysis of section 45(4), section 9B of the Income Tax Act...
WITHHOLDING ON GRATUITY PAYMENT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DISALLOWANCE U/S 14A
FALLACIOUS DISREGARDING OF TRANSACTIONS THAT RESULT IN A TAX BENEFIT TO THE A...
ALLOWABILITY OF OUTSTANDING INTEREST CONVERTED INTO DEBENTURES AS AN EXPENSE ...
DENIAL OF EXEMPTION U/S 10(23C)
CANCELLATION OF REGISTRATION OF TRUST U/S 12AA
Advance tax liability when tds not deducted
How to make an application for SME IPO listing?
What are the post listing compliance norms for SME entities?
What are the steps to be taken after issue by SME?
What are the steps to be taken prior to SME listing?
What are the criteria for SME listing?
TAXATION OF MNCs – HEADING TOWARDS A RESOLUTION
INCORPORATING A COMPANY IN SINGAPORE BY AN INDIAN
AUTOMATIC VACATION OF STAY GRANTED BY TRIBUNALDCIT v. PEPSI FOODS LTD. [2021]...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
IITM - FINAL Option - 01 - 12.08.25.pptx
PPTX
BUSINESS CYCLE_INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT.pptx
PDF
NISM Series V-A MFD Workbook v December 2024.khhhjtgvwevoypdnew one must use ...
PDF
income tax laws notes important pakistan
PPTX
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025
PPT
Lecture notes on Business Research Methods
PDF
Susan Semmelmann: Enriching the Lives of others through her Talents and Bless...
PDF
Ron Thomas - Top Influential Business Leaders Shaping the Modern Industry – 2025
DOCX
Handbook of Entrepreneurship- Chapter 5: Identifying business opportunity.docx
PPTX
chapter 2 entrepreneurship full lecture ppt
PDF
#1 Safe and Secure Verified Cash App Accounts for Purchase.pdf
PDF
Daniels 2024 Inclusive, Sustainable Development
PDF
Solaris Resources Presentation - Corporate August 2025.pdf
PPTX
svnfcksanfskjcsnvvjknsnvsdscnsncxasxa saccacxsax
PPTX
2 - Self & Personality 587689213yiuedhwejbmansbeakjrk
PPTX
Project Management_ SMART Projects Class.pptx
PDF
Booking.com The Global AI Sentiment Report 2025
PDF
Keppel_Proposed Divestment of M1 Limited
PPTX
Board-Reporting-Package-by-Umbrex-5-23-23.pptx
PDF
Environmental Law Communication: Strategies for Advocacy (www.kiu.ac.ug)
IITM - FINAL Option - 01 - 12.08.25.pptx
BUSINESS CYCLE_INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT.pptx
NISM Series V-A MFD Workbook v December 2024.khhhjtgvwevoypdnew one must use ...
income tax laws notes important pakistan
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025
Lecture notes on Business Research Methods
Susan Semmelmann: Enriching the Lives of others through her Talents and Bless...
Ron Thomas - Top Influential Business Leaders Shaping the Modern Industry – 2025
Handbook of Entrepreneurship- Chapter 5: Identifying business opportunity.docx
chapter 2 entrepreneurship full lecture ppt
#1 Safe and Secure Verified Cash App Accounts for Purchase.pdf
Daniels 2024 Inclusive, Sustainable Development
Solaris Resources Presentation - Corporate August 2025.pdf
svnfcksanfskjcsnvvjknsnvsdscnsncxasxa saccacxsax
2 - Self & Personality 587689213yiuedhwejbmansbeakjrk
Project Management_ SMART Projects Class.pptx
Booking.com The Global AI Sentiment Report 2025
Keppel_Proposed Divestment of M1 Limited
Board-Reporting-Package-by-Umbrex-5-23-23.pptx
Environmental Law Communication: Strategies for Advocacy (www.kiu.ac.ug)

Tolerance range in transfer pricing

  • 1. Tolerance Range in Transfer Pricing CA. Divakar Vijayasarathy
  • 3. Legends Used in the Presentation ALP Arm’s Length Price CG Central Government CUP Comparable Uncontrolled Price RPM Resale Price Method CPM Cost Plus Method PSM Profit Split Method TNMM Transaction Net Margin Method PLI Profit Level Indicator
  • 4. Presentation Schema Transfer Pricing Arm’s Length Price Tolerance Range Applicability of Tolerance Range Range Concept and Multi Year Data Rationale and Applicability - Range Concept Multi Year Data Notified Tolerance Range History of Tolerance Range Notified Illustration Global Perspective Recent Announcements (20.09.2019)
  • 5. Transfer Pricing Pricing between Associated Enterprise (AEs) or related parties Special relationship between the parties influencing the price Controlled transaction and price differs from market rate
  • 6. Arm’s Length Price – Sec 92C Methods in determining ALP Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method (CUP) Resale Price Method (RPM) Cost Price Method (CPM) Profit Split Method (PSM) Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) Any Other Method It is the Fair price that would be charged in a transaction without the influence of a related party
  • 7. Tolerance Range Variation (both positive and negative) between the ALP and the price at which the transaction has actually been undertaken does not exceed such percentage as may be notified, then actual transaction price shall be deemed to be the arm's length price The CG has the power to notify the tolerance limit applicable for every AY in determining ALP – Sec 92C(2) In exercise of the powers given, CG has notified the tolerance range applicable for AY 2019-20 on 13th September, 2019
  • 8. Applicability of Tolerance Range • Tolerance Range is allowed only if range concept could not be used (number of comparables being less than 6) and arithmetic mean has been used to justify the transaction Applicability There has to be minimum of 6 comparables for the purpose of applying range concept Range concept cannot be applied to sectors like shipping, oil and gas, etc. where the comparables accepted are generally below 6 in number and will have to resort to the same old arithmetic mean and use of tolerance band, if required, for determination of ALP
  • 9. Range Concept and Multi Year Data The Government has notified “Range Concept” and “Use of Multi Year Data” on 20th October, 2015 Objective To reduce litigation on Transfer Pricing issues Applicability For International transactions and specified domestic transactions undertaken on or after 1st April, 2014 Range Concept - for determining ALP in transfer pricing Use of Multi Year Data - for undertaking comparability analysis by using weighted average in transfer pricing Purpose
  • 10. Rationale – Range Concept • Where more than one price is determined by the most appropriate method, the ALP shall be taken to be arithmetical mean of such price • The use of arithmetical mean for determination of ALP is a unique feature of Indian transfer pricing regime introduced in 2002 • This was necessitated on account of lack of publicly available data in respect of comparables Concept of Arithmetic Mean • Internationally, most countries employ a “range” concept for determination of ALP where more than one price is determined • To align Indian transfer pricing rules with Internationally accepted principles, “Range Concept” was introduced Rationale for introducing Range Concept Concept of arithmetic mean shall also continue to apply in case where the number of comparables is inadequate and range concept cannot be used
  • 11. Range Concept - Applicability Transaction price shown by the taxpayers falling within the range will be accepted and no transfer pricing adjustments shall be made An arm’s length range (arranged in ascending order) beginning from the thirty-fifth percentile of the dataset and ending on the sixty-fifth percentile shall be considered A minimum of 6 comparables would be required in the dataset for applying the concept of range The use of range concept, being a statistical tool, enhances the reliability of analysis undertaken for computation of ALP
  • 12. Multi Year Data Thus, Indian regulations were amended to allow the use of multiple-year data, which is in line with international guidance and best practices across the globe Current year data may not be available at the time when documentation is prepared Further, prices are generally set based on the past year’s data This created significant issues for taxpayer, because some industries may be cyclical Provided multi year data can be used if the taxpayer can provide evidence that the data for the prior years has a bearing on the transfer price Earlier, Income Tax Rules required that the data to be used for determining an ALP compulsorily must pertain to the year in which the international transaction is entered into
  • 13. Notified Tolerance Range – Notification No. SO 3272 (E) [NO.64/2019 (F.NO.500/1/2014-APA-II] Tolerance Range Applicable for AY 2019-20 Nature of Assessee’s Business Tolerable Range for Variation Wholesale trade 1% of actual transaction price In any other case 3% of actual transaction price Wholesale Trading in goods International transaction or Specified Domestic Transaction (SDT) Average monthly closing inventory of such goods is <=10% of sales pertaining to such trading activities Purchase cost of finished goods (FG) is >=80% of the total cost pertaining to such trading activities And
  • 14. History of Tolerance Range Notified 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% AY 2012-13 AY 2013-14 AY 2014-15 AY 2015-16 AY 2016-17 AY 2017-18 AY 2018-19 AY 2019-20 Wholesale Retail Tolerance Range has not been changed from AY 2013-14 and it applies for both International Transaction and Specified Domestic Transaction Tolerance Range for AY 2012-13 applies only for International Transaction
  • 15. Cases where Arithmetic Mean can be Used The dataset consists of < 6 comparables The Most Appropriate Method considered for determination of the ALP is ‘Profit Split Method or ‘Any Other Method’ Most Appropriate Method Situation(s) CUP No. of comparables less than 6 CPM RPM TNMM PSM Any number of comparables Any Other Method
  • 16. Illustration – Tolerance Range A Ltd. Indian Company Software development business B Inc. UK Company (AE) Subsidiary Software Development Services While using TNMM, 4 comparable companies have been identified to have undertaken the comparable uncontrolled transaction in the current year, similar to A Ltd. The Profit level Indicator (PLI) to be used is the operating profit (OP) to operating revenue (OR) The data of operating profit and operating revenue for 4 comparable companies for current year as well as 2 preceding years is available Provides
  • 17. Contd. Sl. No. Name of the Comp-any Current year Year 1 (immediately preceding year) Year 2 (year before immediately preceding year) Aggregation of OR and OP Weighted Average (OP/ OR) 1 B Ltd OP= 75 OR=600 OP= 35 OR=300 OP= 58 OR=450 OP= 168 OR=1350 12.44% 2 C Ltd OP= 25 OR= 400 OP=15 OR=267 OP= 21 OR=350 OP= 61 OR= 1017 6.00% 3 D Ltd OP= 127 OR= 1200 OP=45 OR=576 OP= 82 OR=800 OP= 254 OR=2576 9.86% 4 E Ltd OP= 79 OR= 800 OP=34 OR=209 OP= 51 OR=500 OP= 164 OR=1509 10.87% Rs. in crores ALP using Arithmetic mean = (12.44%+6.00%+9.86%+10.87%)/4 =9.79% Range Concept cannot be applied as the method for determining ALP is TNMM and number of comparables are less than 6, hence, arithmetic mean has been used Let us confirm whether the transaction falls within the tolerance range as specified
  • 18. Contd. Case 1 Case 2 Actual PLI for A Ltd = 9.51% Actual PLI for A Ltd = 6.32% 3% tolerance range is applicable 3% tolerance range is applicable Within the tolerance range Outside the tolerance range No adjustments Adjustment of 2.47% (9.79%-6.32%) shall be made to the transaction price As the transaction does not pertains to wholesale trade, tolerance range of 3% shall be applicable It shall be noted that here the comparison was of two percentages and hence the actual PLI was compared within the tolerance range percentage In cases where ALP and actual transaction is determined in absolute terms, the tolerance range percentage needs to be applied on transaction value and then confirm whether it falls within the range
  • 19. Illustration – Wholesale Trading Average monthly closing inventory of Product G Rs. 20 Lakhs [10% of less of 21 Crores] Cost of purchase of Product G Rs. 18 Crores [more than 80% of Total cost] Would be considered as ‘Wholesale Trading’ B Ltd USA A Traders Ltd India Associated enterprises International transaction Value : Rs 21 Crores Total Cost : Rs 20 Crores Only Trading Activity, Sells Product G
  • 20. Global Perspective Country Tolerance Band Prescribed Sri Lanka 3% Czech Republic 3% to 7% to low value intra-group services Ecuador The tax incurred is > 3% of total taxable income Australia No tolerance range Canada No tolerance range
  • 21. Recent Announcements by Honourable Finance Minister (20.09.2019) Corporate tax reduction - proposal to reduce tax rate for domestic company from existing 30% to 22% subject to condition that such company is not availing of any exemption or incentive Special rate for manufacturing companies – • proposal to slash the corporate tax rate for new companies engaged in manufacturing from existing 25% to 15% • benefit of reduced tax rate shall be available to companies incorporated on or after October 1, 2019 which don't avail of any exemption/incentive and would commence their production on or before March 31, 2023 Companies can opt for concessional tax regime after expiry of tax holiday • Companies which do not opt for the concessional tax regime and avail the tax exemption/incentive shall continue to pay tax at the pre-amended rate • However, those companies can opt for the concessional tax regime after expiry of their tax holiday/exemption period • After the exercise of the option they shall be liable to pay tax at the rate of 22% and option once exercised cannot be subsequently withdrawn
  • 22. Contd. MAT isn't leviable on companies availing concessional tax rate (22% rate) MAT rate reduced • Rate of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) has been reduced from existing 18.5% to 15% Withdrawal of enhanced surcharge • It has been proposed that enhanced surcharge introduced by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 shall not apply to capital gains arising on sale of equity shares in a company or a unit of an equity oriented fund or a unit of a business trust liable for securities transaction tax, in the hands of an individuals, HUF, AOP, BOI and AJP. • Further, the enhanced surcharge shall also not apply to capital gains arising on sale of any security including derivatives, in the hands of Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) No buy-back tax on listed Cos that have made a public announcement of buy-back of shares before July 5, 2019 Expansion of scope of spending of CSR funding; now CSR can be spent on Government aided research institutes, IITs, etc.
  • 23. Thank You DVS Advisors LLP India-Singapore-London-Dubai-Malaysia-Africa www.dvsca.com Copyrights © 2019 DVS Advisors LLP