SlideShare a Scribd company logo
12
Most read
15
Most read
16
Most read
Group 3
MohhammadAfsar Sujon
Traffic Speed
Studies
Types of Speed Studies
July 22, 2012 Traffic Speed Studies2
Spot Speed Studies
spot speed studies to measure
speeds at specific locations
# studies speeds at specific
locations
#determine the design speed
# aid in conducting safety studies
#analyze special operational
situations
TravelTime Studies
Travel time is the time taken by
a vehicle to cross a given
segment of a street or highway
#evaluate the effectiveness of
traffic improvements
#provide economic analyses of
alternatives
#evaluate trends in efficiency and
level of service
Speed Delay Studies
Delay is the time lost by a
vehicle due to causes beyond
the control of the driver
#identify problem areas
#determine the efficiency of a
route
#evaluate effectiveness of traffic
improvements
# provide economic analyses of
alternatives
Specific Objectives of Traffic Speed Study
DetermineVehicle
Spot Speed During
Survey Period
Plot Histogram,
Frequency Curve &
Cumulative
Frequency Curve
DetermineWeighted
Average Speed, Pace,
modal Speed, speed
Limit, design Speed
DetermineTime Mean
Speed(Vt) & Space
Mean Speed(Vs),and
Proof Vs <Vt
ProofThe Wardrop
Relationship Between
Time Mean Speed(Vt) &
Space Mean Speed(Vs),
Find DelayTime & Cost
Of Delay
Draw Speed –Flow
Curve
Scope ofTraffic Speed Studies
Establishing the
effectiveness of
new or existing
speed limits
Magnitudes,
classifications
and the time
and directional
split of vehicular
flows.
Time and
directional split of
vehicle is useful to
identify tidal flow.
Determining
appropriate speed
limits for
application
Investigation of
high-accident
locations at which
speed is
suspected to be a
contributing
cause to the
accident
experience.
Specific control
for the timing of
“yellow” and “all
red” intervals for
traffic signals,
placement of
signs, and
development of
signal
progressions.
Speed Determining Methods
July 22, 2012 Footer text here5
STOPWATCH METHOD
RADAR METER
METHOD
PNEUMATIC
ROADTUBE
METHOD
For the unavailability of Radar &
Pneumatic Road Tube method we had
to use Stopwatch.
Survey Area
July 22, 2012 Footer text here6
Panthapath-Green road intersection and Panthapath-Mirpur Road intersection
Spot speed
Average speed of individual
group from Panthopath to
Russel-square(mph)
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Average
directional
speed (mph)
18.43 16.38 19.48 18.10
Average speed of individual
group from Russel-square to
Panthopath(mph)
Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Average
directional
speed (mph)
20.33 20.00 16.92 19.08
Histograms of vehicles
July 22, 2012 Footer text here8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
15 20 10 5 25 30 40 35
Frequency
Bin
( Panthopath to Russel-square )
0
10
20
30
40
Frequency
Bin
( Russel-square to Panthopath )
Frequency distribution curve
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
(PanthopathTo Russel Square)
% Frequencies
July 22, 2012 Footer text here9
0
10
20
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
(Russel SquareTo Panthopath)
Cumulative frequency distribution curve
July 22, 2012 Footer text here10
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
(Panthopath to Russel-square)
Cumulative% Frequencies
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
(Russel-square to Panthopath)
Tabular data analysis
Data obtained from Group 1, 2, 3 (Panthopath to Russel-square)
Speed
groups
(mph)
Mean of
speed
group, v
(mph)
Frequency, f % frequency
Cumulative
frequency
f x v (v-ū)² f x (v-ū)²
0-4 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 236.97 0.00
4-8 6.00 5.00 5.05 5.05 30 129.82 649.11
8-12 10.00 15.00 15.15 20.20 150 54.67 820.06
12-16 14.00 22.00 22.22 42.42 308 11.52 253.41
16-20 18.00 23.00 23.23 65.66 414 0.37 8.45
20-24 22.00 23.00 23.23 88.89 506 21.22 487.96
24-28 26.00 6.00 6.06 94.95 156 74.06 444.39
28-32 30.00 3.00 3.03 97.98 90 158.91 476.74
32-36 34.00 2.00 2.02 100.00 68 275.76 551.52
36-40 38.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0 424.61 0.00
∑ 99.00 1722 1387.92 3691.64
ū=∑f x v/ ∑f 17.39
July 22, 2012 TRAFFIC SPEED STUDIES11
Tabular data analysis
Data obtained from Group 4, 5, 6 (Russel-square to Panthopath)
Speed
groups
(mph)
Mean of
speed
group, v
(mph)
Frequency, f % frequency
Cumulative
frequency
f x v (v-ū)² f x (v-ū)²
0-4 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 300.81 0.00
4-8 6.00 3.00 3.03 3.03 18 178.06 534.17
8-12 10.00 8.00 8.08 11.11 80 87.31 698.45
12-16 14.00 16.00 16.16 27.27 224 28.56 456.89
16-20 18.00 42.00 42.42 69.70 756 1.81 75.84
20-24 22.00 41.00 41.41 111.11 902 7.06 289.28
24-28 26.00 11.00 11.11 122.22 286 44.31 487.36
28-32 30.00 7.00 7.07 129.29 210 113.56 794.89
32-36 34.00 0.00 0.00 129.29 0 214.81 0.00
∑ 128.00 2476 976.25 3336.88
ū=∑f x v/ ∑f 19.34
July 22, 2012 Footer text here12
% Frequencies
July 22, 2012 Footer text here13
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
% Frequencies
Modal speed= 23 Kmph
pace= 20~35 Kmph
Figure-: Pace & modal speed (Panthopath to Russel-aquare )
Cumulative% Frequencies
July 22, 2012 Footer text here14
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Cumulative% Frequencies
98th percentile= 47 kmph
85th percentile= 35kmph
15th percentile=
16kmph
Figure-: Determination of Speed limit, design speed (Panthopath to Russel-square )
Relationship between Space Mean Speed andTime Mean Speed
Speed
Group
(Mph)
Mean Speed
of Group,V
(Mph)
No. of
vehicles in
group, f
f*V f/V f(V-Vs)²
0-5 2.50 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
5-10 7.50 4 30.00 0.53 146.89
10-15 12.50 39 487.50 3.12 43.82
15-20 17.50 14 245.00 0.80 217.33
20-25 22.50 6 135.00 0.27 479.54
25-30 27.50 2 55.00 0.07 388.65
30-35 32.50 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 65 952.50 4.79 1276.23
July 22, 2012 Footer text here15
Panthopath To Russel Square Russel square to Panthopath
Speed
Group
(Mph)
Mean Speed
ofGroup,V
(Mph)
No. of
vehicles in
group, f
f*V f/V f(V-Vs)²
0-5 2.5 9 22.5 3.60 496.84
5-10 7.5 18 135 2.40 106.29
10-15 12.5 16 200 1.28 105.68
15-20 17.5 24 420 1.37 1375.32
20-25 22.5 0 0 0.00 0.00
25-30 27.5 0 0 0.00 0.00
30-35 32.5 0 0 0.00 0.00
35-40 37.5 2 75 0.05 1520.21
Total 69 852.5 8.70 3604.34
Time mean speed, Vt = ∑f*V / ∑f
= 952.50/65
= 14.65 mph
Space Mean Speed, Vs = ∑f/∑(f/V)
= 65/4.79
= 13.57 mph
Time mean speed, Vt = ∑f*V / ∑f
= 852.5/69
= 12.35 mph
Space Mean Speed, Vs = ∑f/∑(f/V)
=
69/8.70
So,Vs < Vt
The Wardrop Relationship Between
Time Mean Speed AndThe Space Mean Speed
July 22, 2012 Footer text here16
#Time mean speed,Vt = ∑f*V / ∑f
= 852.5/69
= 12.35 mph
# Space Mean Speed,Vs = ∑f/∑(f/V)
= 69/8.70
= 7.93 mph
#Variance, Sd² = ∑f(V-Vs)²/(∑f-1)
= 3604.34/ 68
= 53 mph
#Vs + Sd²/Vs = 7.93 + 53/7.93
= 14.61 > (Vt =12.35 )
Russel-square- Panthopath Direction
#Time mean speed,Vt = ∑f*V / ∑f
= 952.50/65
= 14.65 mph
# Space Mean Speed,Vs = ∑f/∑(f/V)
= 65/4.79
= 13.57 mph
#Variance, Sd² = ∑f(V-Vs)²/(∑f-1)
= 1276.23/ 64
= 19.94mph
#Vs + Sd²/Vs = 13.57 + 19.94/13.57
= 15.04 >(Vt =14.65 )
Panthopath- Russel-square Direction
The Wardrop Relationship (Vs + Sd²/Vs > Vt ) Between Time Mean Speed
And The Space Mean Speed Which Has Been Found Right.
Delay Study
Panthopath- Russell Square
Car 3- wheeler Bus Motorcycle
Free flow Speed(mph) 20.00 15.00 18.00 25.00
Average Speed(mph) 15.51 12.21 12.53 16.49
Delay from Free Flow Speed(mph) 4.49 2.79 5.47 8.51
Delay (hr/km) 0.14 0.22 0.11 0.07
Russell Square- Panthopath
Car 3- wheeler Bus Motorcycle
Free flow Speed(mph) 20.00 15.00 18.00 25.00
Average Speed(mph) 11.78 10.71 11.63 13.05
Delay from Free Flow Speed(mph) 8.22 4.29 6.37 11.95
Delay (hr/km) 0.08 0.14 0.10 0.05
July 22, 2012 Footer text here17
Value ofTravelTime (VOT) andVehicle Operating Cost (VOC)
VehicleType Bus Car 3- wheeler Motorcycle
Fin Eco Fin Eco Fin Eco Fin Eco
1 hour delay cost (assuming
quarter liter Diesel fuel + 1/15
liter of lubricant consumed)
395.92 311.48 162.98 138.35 155.67 128.53 154.57 122.43
1 hour delay cost (assuming
quarter liter Petrol fuel + 1/15
liter of lubricant consumed)
393.47 302.48 183.48 149.65 162.17 137.53 162.19 129.53
July 22, 2012 Footer text here18
HourlyVOC for 2012/13
Item Cost Unit Bus Car 3- wheeler Motor Cycle
Unit Costs Fin Econ Fin Econ Fin Econ Fin Econ
Purchase cost of vehicle Tk'000 per vehicle 4456 3815 2292 1399 327 195 137 195
Cost of new tire Tk per tire 25375 17780 4163 2932 1863 1309 1181 1309
Maintenance labor cost Tk per hour 92 86 82 66 82 66 82 66
Overhead cost Tk '000 per annum 1898 1468 48 39 19 23 19 23
Crew cost Tk per hour 50 40 33 28 26 22 26 22
Fuel cost Diesel Tk per liter 61 58 65 43 46 38 46 38
Fuel cost petrol Tk per liter 85 72 76 62 76 62 76 62
Lubricant cost Tk per liter 270 198 230 184 230 184.00 230 184
Estimated factor forVOC calculation 2012/13
Value ofTravelTime (VOT) andVehicle Operating Cost (VOC)
VehicleType Bus Car 3- wheeler Motorcycle
Fin Eco Fin Eco Fin Eco Fin Eco
Diesel millionTk. 2.4 1.9 1.0 0.8 1.5 1.2 0.5 0.4
Petrol millionTk. 2.4 1.8 1.1 0.9 1.6 1.3 0.5 0.4
July 22, 2012 Footer text here19
VOC calculation table
Vehicle Bus Car 3- wheeler Motorcycle
Average Occupancy 40 4 4 1.1
VOT (Tk/passenger/hr) 40.7 78.8 33 58.4
Total yearly delay (hr) 642 1051 642.5 350.5
TotalVOT (millionTk.) 1.1 0.33 0.08 0.02
TravelTime Cost of Passengers by Category ofVehicle
Speed flow curve
Group
No.
Flow
(PCU/hr)
Speed
(mile/hr)
Capacity
(PCU/hr)
V/C
ratio
1 905 16.21
4587
0.19729
7
2 917 12.39
0.19991
3
3 972 16.09
0.21190
3
July 22, 2012 Footer text here20
PanthapathTo Russell Square (EToW)
0
5
10
15
20
900 920 940 960 980
Panthapath to russell square
Speed
(mile/hr)
Group
No.
Flow
(PCU/hr)
Speed
(mile/hr)
Capacity
(PCU/hr)
V/C ratio
4 778 11.76
3807
0.20436
0.2440245 929 13.99
0.2487526 947 11.6
RUSSELL SQUARETO PANTHAPATH (W to E)
0
5
10
15
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Russell square to panthapath
Recommendations
Automatic data
collection process
must be used for
more realistic
information.
Manual count
method must be
done by trained
enumerators.
Huge amount of
data should be
collected for data
combination
between different
group.
The result of the
study suggests that
traffic control
system have to
improve for smooth
flow.
Volume study must
be done before
speed study.
Speed & delay
studies must be
done carefully for
cost & benefit
calculation of a
project.
July 22, 2012 Footer text here21
Scope for Further Study
July 22, 2012 Footer text here22
This speed study was
completed by un-skilled
enumerators that leads to
some error in data collection
process.
Data collected by manual
method is unreliable and
irreversible. For more
representatives and reliable
data automatic data
collection method should be
followed.
Data were collected for
short-period (30 minute)
can’t implies flow
characteristics of the road. If
3days continuous data were
collected, that would be
much more representative
and realistic.

More Related Content

PPTX
Traffic volume survey
PPT
LIFT IRRIGATION SYSTEM
PDF
Introduction to procurement
PDF
05 Traffic Data Collection (Traffic Engineering هندسة المرور & Prof. Saad AlG...
PPTX
Chronic Superficial Venous insufficiency
PPTX
Traffic studies volume study
PPTX
Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge
PPTX
Counterfort Retaining Wall
Traffic volume survey
LIFT IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Introduction to procurement
05 Traffic Data Collection (Traffic Engineering هندسة المرور & Prof. Saad AlG...
Chronic Superficial Venous insufficiency
Traffic studies volume study
Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge
Counterfort Retaining Wall

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Traffic volume study
PDF
Spot speed study, transport planning
PDF
L2 Microscopic Traffic Flow Parameters
PPTX
Traffic volume-study-presentation-final
PPT
Traffic Engineering
PPTX
traffic engineering
PDF
07 Speed, Travel Time & Delay Studies (Traffic Engineering هندسة المرور & Pro...
PPTX
traffic characteristics
PPTX
Traffic volume study
PPTX
Chapter 1 traffic characterstics
PPTX
TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDIES
PDF
Lecture 02 Traffic Flow Characteristics (Traffic Engineering هندسة المرور & D...
PPTX
Traffic engineering
PPTX
human factor and road safety
PPTX
Origin – Destination survey
PPTX
Traffic volume
PDF
02-B Components of Traffic System [Roadway and Control Device] (Traffic Engin...
PPTX
Traffic studies
PDF
02-A Components of Traffic System [Road Users and Vehicles] (Traffic Engineer...
PDF
IRC.SP.19-2001 - MANUAL FOR SURVEY, INVESTIGATION AND PREPARATION OF ROAD PRO...
Traffic volume study
Spot speed study, transport planning
L2 Microscopic Traffic Flow Parameters
Traffic volume-study-presentation-final
Traffic Engineering
traffic engineering
07 Speed, Travel Time & Delay Studies (Traffic Engineering هندسة المرور & Pro...
traffic characteristics
Traffic volume study
Chapter 1 traffic characterstics
TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDIES
Lecture 02 Traffic Flow Characteristics (Traffic Engineering هندسة المرور & D...
Traffic engineering
human factor and road safety
Origin – Destination survey
Traffic volume
02-B Components of Traffic System [Roadway and Control Device] (Traffic Engin...
Traffic studies
02-A Components of Traffic System [Road Users and Vehicles] (Traffic Engineer...
IRC.SP.19-2001 - MANUAL FOR SURVEY, INVESTIGATION AND PREPARATION OF ROAD PRO...
Ad

Viewers also liked (11)

PDF
Spot Speed Study (Lab)
PDF
Spot speed studies and speed delay time survey
PPTX
Spot speed study
PPT
Speed study analysis
PPTX
Chapter 2 traffic studies
PPTX
Traffic Volume Studies
PDF
BRT Workshop - Bus Rapid Transit and Traffic Safety
PPTX
BRT Station Design in the Urban Context
PPTX
Traffic speed analysis presentation- ahmed ferdous-1004137 buet
PPTX
Traffic volume-study
PPTX
Transportation Engineering I
Spot Speed Study (Lab)
Spot speed studies and speed delay time survey
Spot speed study
Speed study analysis
Chapter 2 traffic studies
Traffic Volume Studies
BRT Workshop - Bus Rapid Transit and Traffic Safety
BRT Station Design in the Urban Context
Traffic speed analysis presentation- ahmed ferdous-1004137 buet
Traffic volume-study
Transportation Engineering I
Ad

Similar to Traffic speed study (20)

PPTX
Presentation on Spot Speed Study Analysis for the course CE 454
PDF
Hk icth2016 14th_june2016_htw_website version
DOCX
258670207-lfffffffffffffffffevel-of-service.docx
DOCX
Minor Transport
PPTX
Waterfall Turbine Development Primer - Updated
PPTX
Trip Distribution Model - Four Step Model
PDF
Vehicle emissions measurement: micro-trip analysis of non-stationary time-series
PDF
Spot speed
PPTX
G economics (tharath 20170121)_2nd workshop
PDF
CG Value_Estimation
PPTX
2.2_Traffic Studies_Speed Studies_045446.pptx
DOCX
Transportation cost benefit analysis-ahmed ferdous-1004137-buet
PPTX
Dr Glyn Rhys-Tyler - Road vehicle exhaust emissions; 'an age of uncertainty' ...
PPTX
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
PDF
When Micromobility Attacks
PDF
Transport Eng. Chap 3..pdf and road safety
PDF
Travel_Time_Reliability
DOCX
Highway designing calculations
PPTX
Financial analysis of sahara darwaja case study
PDF
Uniformity of Nonwoven Web Formation
Presentation on Spot Speed Study Analysis for the course CE 454
Hk icth2016 14th_june2016_htw_website version
258670207-lfffffffffffffffffevel-of-service.docx
Minor Transport
Waterfall Turbine Development Primer - Updated
Trip Distribution Model - Four Step Model
Vehicle emissions measurement: micro-trip analysis of non-stationary time-series
Spot speed
G economics (tharath 20170121)_2nd workshop
CG Value_Estimation
2.2_Traffic Studies_Speed Studies_045446.pptx
Transportation cost benefit analysis-ahmed ferdous-1004137-buet
Dr Glyn Rhys-Tyler - Road vehicle exhaust emissions; 'an age of uncertainty' ...
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
When Micromobility Attacks
Transport Eng. Chap 3..pdf and road safety
Travel_Time_Reliability
Highway designing calculations
Financial analysis of sahara darwaja case study
Uniformity of Nonwoven Web Formation

Traffic speed study

  • 2. Types of Speed Studies July 22, 2012 Traffic Speed Studies2 Spot Speed Studies spot speed studies to measure speeds at specific locations # studies speeds at specific locations #determine the design speed # aid in conducting safety studies #analyze special operational situations TravelTime Studies Travel time is the time taken by a vehicle to cross a given segment of a street or highway #evaluate the effectiveness of traffic improvements #provide economic analyses of alternatives #evaluate trends in efficiency and level of service Speed Delay Studies Delay is the time lost by a vehicle due to causes beyond the control of the driver #identify problem areas #determine the efficiency of a route #evaluate effectiveness of traffic improvements # provide economic analyses of alternatives
  • 3. Specific Objectives of Traffic Speed Study DetermineVehicle Spot Speed During Survey Period Plot Histogram, Frequency Curve & Cumulative Frequency Curve DetermineWeighted Average Speed, Pace, modal Speed, speed Limit, design Speed DetermineTime Mean Speed(Vt) & Space Mean Speed(Vs),and Proof Vs <Vt ProofThe Wardrop Relationship Between Time Mean Speed(Vt) & Space Mean Speed(Vs), Find DelayTime & Cost Of Delay Draw Speed –Flow Curve
  • 4. Scope ofTraffic Speed Studies Establishing the effectiveness of new or existing speed limits Magnitudes, classifications and the time and directional split of vehicular flows. Time and directional split of vehicle is useful to identify tidal flow. Determining appropriate speed limits for application Investigation of high-accident locations at which speed is suspected to be a contributing cause to the accident experience. Specific control for the timing of “yellow” and “all red” intervals for traffic signals, placement of signs, and development of signal progressions.
  • 5. Speed Determining Methods July 22, 2012 Footer text here5 STOPWATCH METHOD RADAR METER METHOD PNEUMATIC ROADTUBE METHOD For the unavailability of Radar & Pneumatic Road Tube method we had to use Stopwatch.
  • 6. Survey Area July 22, 2012 Footer text here6 Panthapath-Green road intersection and Panthapath-Mirpur Road intersection
  • 7. Spot speed Average speed of individual group from Panthopath to Russel-square(mph) Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Average directional speed (mph) 18.43 16.38 19.48 18.10 Average speed of individual group from Russel-square to Panthopath(mph) Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Average directional speed (mph) 20.33 20.00 16.92 19.08
  • 8. Histograms of vehicles July 22, 2012 Footer text here8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 15 20 10 5 25 30 40 35 Frequency Bin ( Panthopath to Russel-square ) 0 10 20 30 40 Frequency Bin ( Russel-square to Panthopath )
  • 9. Frequency distribution curve 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 (PanthopathTo Russel Square) % Frequencies July 22, 2012 Footer text here9 0 10 20 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 (Russel SquareTo Panthopath)
  • 10. Cumulative frequency distribution curve July 22, 2012 Footer text here10 05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 (Panthopath to Russel-square) Cumulative% Frequencies 05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 (Russel-square to Panthopath)
  • 11. Tabular data analysis Data obtained from Group 1, 2, 3 (Panthopath to Russel-square) Speed groups (mph) Mean of speed group, v (mph) Frequency, f % frequency Cumulative frequency f x v (v-ū)² f x (v-ū)² 0-4 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 236.97 0.00 4-8 6.00 5.00 5.05 5.05 30 129.82 649.11 8-12 10.00 15.00 15.15 20.20 150 54.67 820.06 12-16 14.00 22.00 22.22 42.42 308 11.52 253.41 16-20 18.00 23.00 23.23 65.66 414 0.37 8.45 20-24 22.00 23.00 23.23 88.89 506 21.22 487.96 24-28 26.00 6.00 6.06 94.95 156 74.06 444.39 28-32 30.00 3.00 3.03 97.98 90 158.91 476.74 32-36 34.00 2.00 2.02 100.00 68 275.76 551.52 36-40 38.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0 424.61 0.00 ∑ 99.00 1722 1387.92 3691.64 ū=∑f x v/ ∑f 17.39 July 22, 2012 TRAFFIC SPEED STUDIES11
  • 12. Tabular data analysis Data obtained from Group 4, 5, 6 (Russel-square to Panthopath) Speed groups (mph) Mean of speed group, v (mph) Frequency, f % frequency Cumulative frequency f x v (v-ū)² f x (v-ū)² 0-4 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 300.81 0.00 4-8 6.00 3.00 3.03 3.03 18 178.06 534.17 8-12 10.00 8.00 8.08 11.11 80 87.31 698.45 12-16 14.00 16.00 16.16 27.27 224 28.56 456.89 16-20 18.00 42.00 42.42 69.70 756 1.81 75.84 20-24 22.00 41.00 41.41 111.11 902 7.06 289.28 24-28 26.00 11.00 11.11 122.22 286 44.31 487.36 28-32 30.00 7.00 7.07 129.29 210 113.56 794.89 32-36 34.00 0.00 0.00 129.29 0 214.81 0.00 ∑ 128.00 2476 976.25 3336.88 ū=∑f x v/ ∑f 19.34 July 22, 2012 Footer text here12
  • 13. % Frequencies July 22, 2012 Footer text here13 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 % Frequencies Modal speed= 23 Kmph pace= 20~35 Kmph Figure-: Pace & modal speed (Panthopath to Russel-aquare )
  • 14. Cumulative% Frequencies July 22, 2012 Footer text here14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Cumulative% Frequencies 98th percentile= 47 kmph 85th percentile= 35kmph 15th percentile= 16kmph Figure-: Determination of Speed limit, design speed (Panthopath to Russel-square )
  • 15. Relationship between Space Mean Speed andTime Mean Speed Speed Group (Mph) Mean Speed of Group,V (Mph) No. of vehicles in group, f f*V f/V f(V-Vs)² 0-5 2.50 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5-10 7.50 4 30.00 0.53 146.89 10-15 12.50 39 487.50 3.12 43.82 15-20 17.50 14 245.00 0.80 217.33 20-25 22.50 6 135.00 0.27 479.54 25-30 27.50 2 55.00 0.07 388.65 30-35 32.50 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 65 952.50 4.79 1276.23 July 22, 2012 Footer text here15 Panthopath To Russel Square Russel square to Panthopath Speed Group (Mph) Mean Speed ofGroup,V (Mph) No. of vehicles in group, f f*V f/V f(V-Vs)² 0-5 2.5 9 22.5 3.60 496.84 5-10 7.5 18 135 2.40 106.29 10-15 12.5 16 200 1.28 105.68 15-20 17.5 24 420 1.37 1375.32 20-25 22.5 0 0 0.00 0.00 25-30 27.5 0 0 0.00 0.00 30-35 32.5 0 0 0.00 0.00 35-40 37.5 2 75 0.05 1520.21 Total 69 852.5 8.70 3604.34 Time mean speed, Vt = ∑f*V / ∑f = 952.50/65 = 14.65 mph Space Mean Speed, Vs = ∑f/∑(f/V) = 65/4.79 = 13.57 mph Time mean speed, Vt = ∑f*V / ∑f = 852.5/69 = 12.35 mph Space Mean Speed, Vs = ∑f/∑(f/V) = 69/8.70 So,Vs < Vt
  • 16. The Wardrop Relationship Between Time Mean Speed AndThe Space Mean Speed July 22, 2012 Footer text here16 #Time mean speed,Vt = ∑f*V / ∑f = 852.5/69 = 12.35 mph # Space Mean Speed,Vs = ∑f/∑(f/V) = 69/8.70 = 7.93 mph #Variance, Sd² = ∑f(V-Vs)²/(∑f-1) = 3604.34/ 68 = 53 mph #Vs + Sd²/Vs = 7.93 + 53/7.93 = 14.61 > (Vt =12.35 ) Russel-square- Panthopath Direction #Time mean speed,Vt = ∑f*V / ∑f = 952.50/65 = 14.65 mph # Space Mean Speed,Vs = ∑f/∑(f/V) = 65/4.79 = 13.57 mph #Variance, Sd² = ∑f(V-Vs)²/(∑f-1) = 1276.23/ 64 = 19.94mph #Vs + Sd²/Vs = 13.57 + 19.94/13.57 = 15.04 >(Vt =14.65 ) Panthopath- Russel-square Direction The Wardrop Relationship (Vs + Sd²/Vs > Vt ) Between Time Mean Speed And The Space Mean Speed Which Has Been Found Right.
  • 17. Delay Study Panthopath- Russell Square Car 3- wheeler Bus Motorcycle Free flow Speed(mph) 20.00 15.00 18.00 25.00 Average Speed(mph) 15.51 12.21 12.53 16.49 Delay from Free Flow Speed(mph) 4.49 2.79 5.47 8.51 Delay (hr/km) 0.14 0.22 0.11 0.07 Russell Square- Panthopath Car 3- wheeler Bus Motorcycle Free flow Speed(mph) 20.00 15.00 18.00 25.00 Average Speed(mph) 11.78 10.71 11.63 13.05 Delay from Free Flow Speed(mph) 8.22 4.29 6.37 11.95 Delay (hr/km) 0.08 0.14 0.10 0.05 July 22, 2012 Footer text here17
  • 18. Value ofTravelTime (VOT) andVehicle Operating Cost (VOC) VehicleType Bus Car 3- wheeler Motorcycle Fin Eco Fin Eco Fin Eco Fin Eco 1 hour delay cost (assuming quarter liter Diesel fuel + 1/15 liter of lubricant consumed) 395.92 311.48 162.98 138.35 155.67 128.53 154.57 122.43 1 hour delay cost (assuming quarter liter Petrol fuel + 1/15 liter of lubricant consumed) 393.47 302.48 183.48 149.65 162.17 137.53 162.19 129.53 July 22, 2012 Footer text here18 HourlyVOC for 2012/13 Item Cost Unit Bus Car 3- wheeler Motor Cycle Unit Costs Fin Econ Fin Econ Fin Econ Fin Econ Purchase cost of vehicle Tk'000 per vehicle 4456 3815 2292 1399 327 195 137 195 Cost of new tire Tk per tire 25375 17780 4163 2932 1863 1309 1181 1309 Maintenance labor cost Tk per hour 92 86 82 66 82 66 82 66 Overhead cost Tk '000 per annum 1898 1468 48 39 19 23 19 23 Crew cost Tk per hour 50 40 33 28 26 22 26 22 Fuel cost Diesel Tk per liter 61 58 65 43 46 38 46 38 Fuel cost petrol Tk per liter 85 72 76 62 76 62 76 62 Lubricant cost Tk per liter 270 198 230 184 230 184.00 230 184 Estimated factor forVOC calculation 2012/13
  • 19. Value ofTravelTime (VOT) andVehicle Operating Cost (VOC) VehicleType Bus Car 3- wheeler Motorcycle Fin Eco Fin Eco Fin Eco Fin Eco Diesel millionTk. 2.4 1.9 1.0 0.8 1.5 1.2 0.5 0.4 Petrol millionTk. 2.4 1.8 1.1 0.9 1.6 1.3 0.5 0.4 July 22, 2012 Footer text here19 VOC calculation table Vehicle Bus Car 3- wheeler Motorcycle Average Occupancy 40 4 4 1.1 VOT (Tk/passenger/hr) 40.7 78.8 33 58.4 Total yearly delay (hr) 642 1051 642.5 350.5 TotalVOT (millionTk.) 1.1 0.33 0.08 0.02 TravelTime Cost of Passengers by Category ofVehicle
  • 20. Speed flow curve Group No. Flow (PCU/hr) Speed (mile/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) V/C ratio 1 905 16.21 4587 0.19729 7 2 917 12.39 0.19991 3 3 972 16.09 0.21190 3 July 22, 2012 Footer text here20 PanthapathTo Russell Square (EToW) 0 5 10 15 20 900 920 940 960 980 Panthapath to russell square Speed (mile/hr) Group No. Flow (PCU/hr) Speed (mile/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) V/C ratio 4 778 11.76 3807 0.20436 0.2440245 929 13.99 0.2487526 947 11.6 RUSSELL SQUARETO PANTHAPATH (W to E) 0 5 10 15 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Russell square to panthapath
  • 21. Recommendations Automatic data collection process must be used for more realistic information. Manual count method must be done by trained enumerators. Huge amount of data should be collected for data combination between different group. The result of the study suggests that traffic control system have to improve for smooth flow. Volume study must be done before speed study. Speed & delay studies must be done carefully for cost & benefit calculation of a project. July 22, 2012 Footer text here21
  • 22. Scope for Further Study July 22, 2012 Footer text here22 This speed study was completed by un-skilled enumerators that leads to some error in data collection process. Data collected by manual method is unreliable and irreversible. For more representatives and reliable data automatic data collection method should be followed. Data were collected for short-period (30 minute) can’t implies flow characteristics of the road. If 3days continuous data were collected, that would be much more representative and realistic.