Introduction of IPv6NET in Tridentcom 2014
1 like544 views
The document discusses the transition from IPv4 to IPv6, noting that IPv6 is not backward compatible, leading to a coexistence period of both protocols. It evaluates various transition technologies such as MAP-E, MAP-T, DS-Lite, and 464XLAT in different network environments, highlighting their performance in terms of latency and throughput. The study also emphasizes the need for enhancements in the operational capabilities of these transition implementations before their use in production networks.
![6
www.ipv6net.ro
IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed
RFC4057[1]
An enterprise with an
IPv6 only backbone
Integrates IPv4 capable
nodes
IPv4 over IPv6
communication is needed
[1] J. Bound. IPv6 Enterprise Network Scenarios. RFC 4057 (Informational), June 2005.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/tridentcommg-150527023036-lva1-app6892/85/Introduction-of-IPv6NET-in-Tridentcom-2014-6-320.jpg)
![7
www.ipv6net.ro
IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed
Built as an overlay of
StarBED
Measured the network
performance of:
MAPe
MAPt
DSLite
464XLAT
Asamap vyatta[2] as base OS
Used D-ITG[3] as traffic
generator
[3] Alessio Botta, Alberto Dainotti, and Antonio Pescape. A tool for the generation of
realistic network workload for emerging networking scenarios. Computer Networks,
56(15):3531{3547, 2012.
[2] http://enog.jp/~masakazu/vyatta/map/](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/tridentcommg-150527023036-lva1-app6892/85/Introduction-of-IPv6NET-in-Tridentcom-2014-7-320.jpg)
![8
www.ipv6net.ro
IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed
Widecamp
September 2013[4]
MAPe, MAPt, Dslite
and 464XLAT
transition as 464
technologies
Asamap vyatta as
transition
implementation
[4] http://www.wide.ad.jp/](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/tridentcommg-150527023036-lva1-app6892/85/Introduction-of-IPv6NET-in-Tridentcom-2014-8-320.jpg)
![21
www.ipv6net.ro
IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed
[5] O. Troan, W. Dec, X. Li, C. Bao, S. Matsushima, T. Murakami, and T. Taylor. Mapping of
Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP). draft-ietf-softwire-map-08, August 2013.
Building Blocks :
A map domain
MAPe CE
MAPe BR
The mapping rule
IPv4 prefix
IPv6 prefix
Embedded Adress
(EA) bits
IPv4
IPv6 IPv4
IPv6IPv4
IPv4](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/tridentcommg-150527023036-lva1-app6892/85/Introduction-of-IPv6NET-in-Tridentcom-2014-21-320.jpg)
![22
www.ipv6net.ro
IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed
IPv4
IPv6 IPv4
IPv4
[6] X. Li, C. Bao, W. Dec, O. Troan, S. Matsushima, and T. Murakami. Mapping
of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T). draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-04,
September 2013.
IPv6IPv4
Building Blocks :
A map domain
MAPe CE
MAPe BR
The mapping rule
IPv4 prefix
IPv6 prefix
Embedded Adress
(EA) bits](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/tridentcommg-150527023036-lva1-app6892/85/Introduction-of-IPv6NET-in-Tridentcom-2014-22-320.jpg)
![23
www.ipv6net.ro
IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed
Building Blocks :
Basic Bridging Broad Band
(B4)
Address Family Transition
Router (AFTR)
The shared IPv4 address
pool
IPv6 IPv4
IPv6IPv4
IPv4IPv4[7] A. Durand, R. Droms, J. Woodyatt, and Y. Lee. Dual-Stack Lite Broadband
Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion. RFC 6333 (Proposed Standard), August
2011.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/tridentcommg-150527023036-lva1-app6892/85/Introduction-of-IPv6NET-in-Tridentcom-2014-23-320.jpg)
![24
www.ipv6net.ro
IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed
IPv6
Building blocks:
Customer-side translator
(CLAT) Stateless
translation
Provider-side translator
(PLAT ) stateful
translation
IPv4
IPv6 IPv4
IPv6IPv4
[8] M. Mawatari, M. Kawashima, and C. Byrne. 464XLAT: Combination of
Stateful and Stateless Translation. RFC 6877, April 2013.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/tridentcommg-150527023036-lva1-app6892/85/Introduction-of-IPv6NET-in-Tridentcom-2014-24-320.jpg)
Introduction of IPv6NET in Tridentcom 2014
- 1. Marius Georgescu Internet Engineering Laboratory Nara Institute of Science and Technology 2014/05/06
- 2. 2 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed IPv6 is not backwards compatible The Internet will have to withstand a period through which both protocols will coexist Currently only 2.09 % of worldwide Internet users have IPv6 connectivity
- 3. 3 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed The IETF introduced multiple transition scenarios Many transition technologies have also been introduced (e. g. MAPe, NAT64, DSLite) WHICH ONE is most feasible for a specific scenario ?
- 4. 4 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed Testing Network template Methodology • Open env • Closed env Infrastructure Transition Implementations Network Environment Transition Guideline
- 5. 5 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed
- 6. 6 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed RFC4057[1] An enterprise with an IPv6 only backbone Integrates IPv4 capable nodes IPv4 over IPv6 communication is needed [1] J. Bound. IPv6 Enterprise Network Scenarios. RFC 4057 (Informational), June 2005.
- 7. 7 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed Built as an overlay of StarBED Measured the network performance of: MAPe MAPt DSLite 464XLAT Asamap vyatta[2] as base OS Used D-ITG[3] as traffic generator [3] Alessio Botta, Alberto Dainotti, and Antonio Pescape. A tool for the generation of realistic network workload for emerging networking scenarios. Computer Networks, 56(15):3531{3547, 2012. [2] http://enog.jp/~masakazu/vyatta/map/
- 8. 8 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed Widecamp September 2013[4] MAPe, MAPt, Dslite and 464XLAT transition as 464 technologies Asamap vyatta as transition implementation [4] http://www.wide.ad.jp/
- 9. 9 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 64 128 256 512 1024 1280 1518 1522 2048 4096 8192 9216 Round-tripDelayUDP(ms) Frame size (bytes) DC IPv4 DC IPv6 ASAMAP IPv6 MAPe IPv4 MAPt IPv4 DSLite IPv4 464XLAT IPv4
- 10. 10 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 64 128 256 512 1024 1280 1518 1522 2048 4096 8192 9216 JitterUDP(ms) Frame size (bytes) DC IPv4 DC IPv6 ASAMAP IPv6 MAPe IPv4 MAPt IPv4 DSLite IPv4 464XLAT IPv4
- 11. 11 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 64 128 256 512 1024 1280 1518 1522 2048 4096 8192 9216 ThroughputUDP(kbps) Frame size (bytes) DC IPv4 DC IPv6 ASAMAP IPv6 MAPt IPv4 464XLAT IPv4 MAPe IPv4 DSLite IPv4
- 12. 12 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 64 128 256 512 1024 1280 1518 1522 2048 4096 8192 9216 CPULoadCEUDP (No.ofprocessesinqueue) Frame size (bytes) DC IPv4 DC IPv6 ASAMAP IPv6 MAPe IPv4 MAPt IPv4 DSLite IPv4 464XLAT IPv4
- 13. 13 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed 0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050 0.060 64 128 256 512 1024 1280 1518 1522 2048 4096 8192 9216 CPULoadPEUDP (No.ofprocessesinqueue) Frame size (Bytes) DC IPv4 DC IPv6 ASAMAP IPv6 MAPe IPv4 MAPt IPv4 DSLite IPv4 464XLAT IPv4
- 14. 14 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed *InitialSetup3 Self configuration according to contextual configuration details *FaultDetermination3 Perform self-check troubleshooting sequence *RCA3 Display in the user console the critical messages with contextual details
- 15. 15 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed
- 16. 16 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed Lack of control data Cross check the results with commercial benchmarking tools The diversity and complexity of existing production networks The methodology can be reproduced and customized results can be obtained Coping with the number of existing and future technologies Research collaboration can transform IPv6NET into an exhaustive IPv6 transition resource
- 17. 17 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed Using the proposed IPv6NET and the associated methodology we have identified the following feasibility trends: Closed Environment MAPe had a better overall performance followed closely by DSLite, MAPt and 464XLAT Translation-based technologies (464XLAT, MAPt) had better latency Encapsulation-based technologies (MAPe, DSLite) had better throughput Open Environment Applications capability results indicate asamap as a mature and suitable transition implementation Operational capability results indicate enhancements are needed before using asamap in a production network
- 18. 18 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed Formula for the calculation of GFI Rough idea, use a weighted average GFIASAMAPe= Wmetric1 * Smetric1 + Wmetric2 * Smetric2 … Wmetric1 – weight of metric1 Smetric1 – score for ASAMAPe for metric1 Metric for scalability Metric for Security quantification
- 19. 19 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed Marius Georgescu liviumarius-g@is.naist.jp www.ipv6net.ro
- 20. 20 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed Dual stack Host side and edge nodes A base for other transition technologies Translation Achieves direct communication Breaks the end-to-end model Tunneling Used for heterogeneous environments traversal IPv6 IPv4 IPv6IPv4 IPv6IPv4
- 21. 21 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed [5] O. Troan, W. Dec, X. Li, C. Bao, S. Matsushima, T. Murakami, and T. Taylor. Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP). draft-ietf-softwire-map-08, August 2013. Building Blocks : A map domain MAPe CE MAPe BR The mapping rule IPv4 prefix IPv6 prefix Embedded Adress (EA) bits IPv4 IPv6 IPv4 IPv6IPv4 IPv4
- 22. 22 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed IPv4 IPv6 IPv4 IPv4 [6] X. Li, C. Bao, W. Dec, O. Troan, S. Matsushima, and T. Murakami. Mapping of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T). draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-04, September 2013. IPv6IPv4 Building Blocks : A map domain MAPe CE MAPe BR The mapping rule IPv4 prefix IPv6 prefix Embedded Adress (EA) bits
- 23. 23 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed Building Blocks : Basic Bridging Broad Band (B4) Address Family Transition Router (AFTR) The shared IPv4 address pool IPv6 IPv4 IPv6IPv4 IPv4IPv4[7] A. Durand, R. Droms, J. Woodyatt, and Y. Lee. Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion. RFC 6333 (Proposed Standard), August 2011.
- 24. 24 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed IPv6 Building blocks: Customer-side translator (CLAT) Stateless translation Provider-side translator (PLAT ) stateful translation IPv4 IPv6 IPv4 IPv6IPv4 [8] M. Mawatari, M. Kawashima, and C. Byrne. 464XLAT: Combination of Stateful and Stateless Translation. RFC 6877, April 2013.
- 25. 25 www.ipv6net.ro IPv6 Network Evaluation Testbed RT Delay (ms) +/- Jitter (ms) +/- Throughput (Kbps) +/- DC 0.225 0.000 0.016 0.000 8039.0 0.4 MAPe 0.809 0.001 0.167 0.000 7951.8 1.4 MAPt 0.802 0.001 0.177 0.001 7934.6 1.7 DSLite 0.810 0.001 0.167 0.001 7953.5 1.4 464XLAT 0.787 0.001 0.167 0.000 7810.4 1.5