Unconventional Routes To Developing Insect-resistant Crops
1. Unconventional Routes To Developing Insect-
resistant Crops
Dr. Suresh R. Jambagi
Research Associate
Division of Genomic Resources
ICAR- National Bureau of Agricultural Insect
Resources, Bengaluru
jambagisuru@gmail.com
2. CONTENTS
1
• Introduction
2
• Key Concepts
3
• Unconventional approaches
4
• I. Bridging Plant-Insect divide
5 • II. Uncharted approaches to sustainable insect pest management
6 • Conclusion
2
3. 3
INTRODUCTION
Much concerns over widespread use of insecticides and
enhanced insect pest virulence under climate change.
This fuels the need for environmentally safe and sustainable
control strategies.
However, to develop such strategies, a better understanding
of the molecular basis of plant-pest interactions is much
needed.
Field appears to be static, urgently needing shifts in
approaches to identify novel mechanisms by which insects
colonize plants and plants avoid insect pressure.
4. 4
Necessary steps for advancing holistic methodologies that capture
complex plant-insect molecular interactions.
So, highlight novel and underexploited approaches in plant-insect
interaction research as essential routes to translate knowledge of
underlying molecular mechanisms into durable pest control
strategies
5. 5
Studies bridging the plant-insect divide that no
longer treat insects and plants as separate
entities are needed to -
(1) Develop durable tactics for managing insect
virulence to plant defenses,
(2) Identify novel sources of HPR to combat
agricultural pests, and
(3) Rely on predominately proactive rather than
reactive management of insect virulence.
6. 6
KEY CONCEPTS
Compatible interaction
A condition when an insect is able to overcome molecular and physical plant responses,
allowing them to colonize, feed, and reproduce. When plants do not have the molecular
capability to trigger an effective response to prevent colonization, it is considered to be
susceptible
Incompatible interaction
A condition where an organism is not able to feed, colonize, and reproduce on a plant. In
such cases, plants might display an array of responses to prevent the attack. When those
responses are effective, the organisms that display them are considered resistant
Host plant resistance (HPR)
Immunity of a plant species or genotype to colonization and feeding by an insect herbivore.
Non-host plant resistance
Immunity of an entire plant species to all genetic variants of a non-adapted pest or pathogen
species.
- For plant-insect interactions, this means a particular herbivorous insect species is unable to
colonize (i.e., feed, reproduce, live or survive on) a non-host plant species
7. 7
Host plant susceptibility
A condition where some or all genetic variants of an insect species are able to
successfully colonize and reproduce on some or all genetic variants of a plant
species. [Compatible relationship].
Tolerance
A form of defense against herbivores where a plant species or genotype is
able to withstand or recover from damage or injury, such that significant loss
of fitness (i.e., survival, reproduction) is avoided
Insect virulence
The ability of an insect to overcome host defenses, causing alterations at the
physiological, molecular, and biochemical level of the host that ultimately
result in some form of damage or loss of fitness.
Insect non-virulence/avirulence
The inability of a genetic variant of a herbivorous insect species to overcome
host defenses, resulting in reduced insect population growth and reduced
damage to the host plant
Plant-Insect hologenomics
Plant and insect genomes co-evolve with a vast number of microbial
symbionts co-occurring in communities (i.e., microbiomes) that vary in
complexity, interrelatedness, and degree of intimacy with the host organism.
- The conglomerate genome (host + microbiome) is thus considered the
hologenome, the study of which is hologenomics.
8. 8
UNCONVENTIONAL
APPROACHES
I. Bridging Plant-Insect divide II. Uncharted approaches to sustainable
insect pest management
a) Embracing microbial partnerships: IPM in the
Hologenomics Era
b) Tolerating damage to survive: rethinking pest resistance
traits
c) Breeding for incompatibility: learning from interactions
with non-host plants
d) Adapting to crop domestication: counteracting tradeoffs
a) Expanding the multidimensional
framework for molecular plant-insect
interactions
b) A systems biology approach to plant-
insect interactions
9. 9
I. Bridging Plant-Insect divide
II. Uncharted approaches to sustainable
insect pest management
a) Expanding the multidimensional framework for molecular plant-insect
interactions
Plant responses to insect feeding and insect counterresponses are dynamic processes.
Many levels of organizational and functional complexity, executed at different time
scales ranging from fractions of seconds to days or even months.
The well-known layers of defense concept in plants can therefore be expanded to
include both plants and insects.
Understanding of the molecular physiology of plant-insect interactions could lead to
advances in crop protection.
10. 10
Layers Of Molecular Interaction
Between Plant And Insects
A. Plant-insect recognition/perception
plant detection of herbivore feeding,
insect choice of host plant and
detection of defensives
B. Early signaling responses
Calcium waves and reactive oxygen
species production, wounding
responses, other early-stage/immediate
responses
C. Hormone-mediated signalling
Plant phytohormones pathways,
peptide hormones regulating herbivore
digestive processes
11. 11
D. Reconfiguration of metabolism
Metabolic habitat modification of host plant by insect,
reallocation of resources: growth versus defense
E. Production of key molecules mediating interactions
small RNAs, insect effector proteins, elicitor proteins
[insect, plant, or microbe derived; plant volatile emissions;
plant defensive chemicals] antifeedants, growth inhibitors
F. Late-stage or long-term responses
Repair mechanisms, detoxification, defense priming for
future interactions
G. Epigenetic or trans-generational responses
Maternal effects on gene expression, methylation patterns,
histone modifications
13. 13
Recent developments
Sl.
No.
Approaches Reference
1 Plant perception of insect eggs
Hilker and Fatouros, 2016; Bittner
et al., 2017
2
Induction of defenses in response to deposition of feces (e.g.,
caterpillar frass) on plant tissues
Ray et al., 2016
3 Long-term associations between insects and host plants Hohenstein et al., 2019
4
Epigenetic mechanisms and trans-generational or multiannual effects
(e.g., wheat aphids, bilberry folivores,)
Hu et al., 2018; Benevenuto et al.,
2018
Studies unraveling the time series of molecular events that take place during plant-insect
interactions, using both controlled laboratory experiments and broader field-based assessments, are
therefore critical to advancing our knowledge of HPR and insect virulence.
14. 14
b) A systems biology approach to plant-insect interactions
Molecular profiling or multi-species omics approaches are increasingly being used to
characterize and predict plant-microbe and insect microbe molecular interactions.
But have yet to be embraced by the research community
Currently, the parallel responses of plants and insects during colonization or feeding are
unexplored.
First step toward developing a systems biology approach: Conduct research from a
unified multi-species perspective rather than focusing on insect or plant responses alone.
I. Bridging Plant-Insect divide
II. Uncharted approaches to sustainable
insect pest management
15. 15
Emerging areas of research:
1. Role of small regulatory RNAs play in mediating plant-insect interactions (Wang et al., 2017)
Ex: microRNAs, plant or insect-derived
2. Microbial dimension to plant-insect interactions
It make us to understand tri-trophic molecular interactions important for crop health and protection from
pests in diverse agroecosystems.
Ex: plant production of volatile chemicals not only mediates insect attraction to and identification of
suitable hosts but can alert neighboring plants to the presence of herbivores and preemptively trigger
defenses that disarm insect attackers (Dicke and Baldwin, 2010).
Note:
Induced susceptibility and obviation of resistance are understudied factors that could
contribute to improved pest management in agroecosystems.
16. 16
a) Embracing microbial partnerships: IPM in the Hologenomics Era
Microbes influence plant-insect interactions through both direct and indirect mechanisms (Giron et
al., 2017).
Microbial communities can augment the intrinsic defensive capabilities of their host (plant or insect)
or provide novel functions that influence the coevolutionary arms race between plants and insects.
Ex: Microbes enable insects to contend with plant chemical defences in a multitude of ways,
including counteracting harmful effects through direct detoxification or metabolism, reducing
oxidative stress, and by synthesizing phytohormones to manipulate plant physiology (Mason, 2020).
I. Bridging Plant-Insect divide
II. Uncharted approaches to
sustainable insect pest management
17. 17
Do you know…?
Virulence-enhancing bacteria occurring in insect saliva have been found in Colorado
potato beetle larva (Chung et al., 2013) and the Russian wheat aphid (Luna et al., 2018)
Known fact
Insect-vectored plant pathogens (e.g., viruses, phytoplasma) can manipulate host plant
development and defense responses (Carr et al., 2018).
Concept-1: Microbial communities are not only responsible for enhancing insect pest virulence, they also
contribute to plant anti-herbivore defenses.
Ex: Some plant- and soil-associated microbes (e.g., Pseudomonas spp.) are multi-talented colonizers that
suppress plant pathogens and stimulate plant defenses, essentially acting as plant beneficial and insect pathogens
(Vacheron et al., 2019).
Concept-2: Microbes play a role in plant detection of chewing insects
Ex: Symbiotic relationships with AM fungi are one of the best example of microbial-mediated defense priming
against chewing herbivores in tomato (Rivero et al., 2021).
18. 18
Microbial manipulation strategies for pest management
1. Genetic modification of insect microbiomes
To reduce virulence by disrupting fundamental symbiotic relationships or turning resident
microbiota against their insect host (Qadri et al., 2020).
2. Use of beneficial plant associated microbes
It has generated considerable interest as a means to enhance natural defense against insect
pests (Kaur et al., 2020).
3. plant or soil microbes could be used to attract insects to unsuitable hosts or to trap crops.
4. Plant-associated entomopathogens targeting insect pests are also particularly promising
candidates for biocontrol applications in agroecosystems (Wei et al., 2020).
19. 19
5. Use of microbes on leaves to deter aphid colonization by
altering visual cues used in host plant detection (Hendry et
al., 2018).
6. Modification of plant volatile profiles, beneficial root
microbes can also enhance natural biocontrol of pests
(Pangesti et al., 2015).
7. The development of insect pest suppressive soils
Harnesses the benefits of soil-borne insect pathogens
through agricultural practices that promote ecological
diversity (reduced tillage and crop rotations) (Hokkanen
and MenzlerHokkanen, 2018)
20. 20
b) Tolerating damage to survive: rethinking pest resistance traits
Tolerance arises as a form of compatible relationship where no loss of fitness
occurs in either the plant or insect.
Measurements of tolerance traits markedly differ between chewing and sap-feeding
insects.
Chewing insects: focuses on thresholds of plant damage (defoliation) and regrowth
rates (Welter, 1991).
Sap-feeding insects: combination of relative damage ratings and insect population
size (e.g., Pierson et al., 2010).
I. Bridging Plant-Insect divide
II. Uncharted approaches to
sustainable insect pest management
21. 21
Allowing insect injury to occur seems counterintuitive, but research shows
a number of compensatory mechanisms can enable long-term survival and
reproduction in the face of seemingly high insect pressure.
Ex: Best-studied examples of tolerance occurs in soybean, where a suite
of mechanisms (upregulation of detoxification pathways, increased
photosynthetic rates) enable plants to withstand high levels of aphid
pressure while maintaining yield (Chapman et al., 2018).
Research on tolerance mechanisms has primarily involved sap-feeding
pests (aphids).
22. 22
DEMERITS:
Grower and consumer perception is another challenge to overcome when incorporating tolerance into
IPM strategies because ‘‘clean plants’’ are often viewed as necessary for high yield and quality products.
Acceptance of tolerant plant products will likely depend on what tissues (e.g., fruits versus leaves)
show damage or presence of insects and how crops are used or sold (e.g., fresh market, wholesale,
processed)
DO YOU KNOW?
Microbes found in herbivore saliva and honeydew excretions are also known to trigger plant defence
responses (Wari et al., 2019).
Mining herbivore microbiomes for candidate microbes that mediate plant defence responses (i.e., trigger
tolerance mechanisms) could be a valuable resource for developing novel microbial bio stimulants with dual
functions that promote plant vigor while also counteracting pest injury.
23. 23
c) Breeding for incompatibility: Learning from interactions with non-host plants
Mechanisms of non-host insect resistance are rarely investigated.
Insect feeding is perceived differently and triggers distinct responses in preferred versus non-preferred
host plants (Wang et al., 2016).
While, insect rejection of non-hosts is uniquely influenced by a number of factors, including volatile
chemical profiles, nutrient composition, and levels of defensive chemicals (Powell et al., 2006).
A non-host plant is one where incompatible interactions involving mismatched cues for host
recognition, production of toxic defensive chemicals, and/or low nutritional quality prevent sustained
insect colonization and reproduction.
I. Bridging Plant-Insect divide
II. Uncharted approaches to
sustainable insect pest management
24. 24
Plant-insect incompatibility resulting from non-host resistance
could therefore provide a novel route to achieve efficient, broad-
spectrum, and durable resistance against a vast number of
potential plant foes.
Characterization of beneficial or defensive mutualisms between
microbes and non-host plants is another route to uncovering
mechanisms governing resistance to insects that could provide
hologenetic targets for breeding
25. 25
Strategies To Attain The Goal:
1. Cross-species hybridization between susceptible crops and non-host plants.
2. Breeding for non-host traits that boost insect resistance (e.g., highly abundant or
insect-induced volatiles, interactions with microbial symbionts that prime immune
defenses).
3. Lack of natural variation for resistance in host and nonhost plant species can also
be overcome by using genome editing technologies such as CRISPR/Cas and/or
through chemical or radiation mutagenesis, or by augmenting the plant microbiome
with beneficial microbial inoculants that function in herbivore resistance.
26. 26
Examples:
1. Aphid probing behaviour can occur regardless of host suitability, but
individuals may be unable to successfully feed from non-host plants or
phloem feeding may occur but non-host-plant defensive chemicals or low
nutritional quality causes mortality (Dastranj et al., 2018).
2. Ladybird beetle, Epilachna vigintioctopunctata, host recognition combined
with layers of constitutive and induced defenses are proposed to determine
acceptance and feeding on compatible versus non-host plants (Shinogi et al.,
2005).
27. 27
d) Adapting to crop domestication: counteracting tradeoffs
Crop domestication is among the most important events in human history but has resulted in a number of unintentional
consequences that pose a challenge for agricultural sustainability.
Approaches:
1. Back-To-The-Wild Concept
In order to counteract the negative consequences of domestication for plant-insect interactions, several ‘‘back-to-the-
wild’’ approaches could be used to identify the basis of domestication syndromes and provide candidates for improved
breeding efforts.
Ex: Wheat: a transcriptomic and metabolic comparison between wild and domesticated genotypes identified genomic
differences in both plant groups that could influence interactions with insect herbivores. While wild wheat genotypes
have high physical defenses (higher trichome density), their domesticated counterparts have high chemical defenses
against aphids (Batyrshina et al., 2020).
I. Bridging Plant-Insect divide
II. Uncharted approaches to
sustainable insect pest management
28. 28
2. Screening of wild crop relatives
For identifying candidates for hybridization in breeding programs aiming to develop
new pest-resistant varieties.
Ex: Enhanced aphid resistance was identified in a screen of wild Solanum accessions
challenged with two common species which could be useful for improving
domesticated tomato varieties (Frechette et al., 2010).
NOTE:
Wild crop relatives are generally less productive from a yield perspective, they display a
larger degree of improved resistance to stresses, including resistance to aphids. Thus, approaches
combining wild species with elite varieties could help to develop high-yielding and pest-resistant
crops.
29. 29
3. Alleviation of selective pressures
Implementation of management practices that alleviate selective pressures associated with agricultural
environments might be another strategy to sustainably counteract negative effects of domestication on
insect resistance in crop plants.
Research shows increased pest adaptation and evolution when repetitive and homogeneous management
strategies (irrigation, fertilization, and tillage regimes) are used in agricultural systems (Jin et al., 2015).
Ex: Incorporation of crop rotation and cover cropping strategies could lead to decreased pesticide
application.
Must to be consider:
Management should also consider how best to alleviate pest pressure by maintaining beneficial microbes
that help plants defend themselves against insect damage.
30. 30
The main issue is not a general lack of information on the intricate
molecular mechanisms employed by plants and insects in their ever-evolving
interactions. Instead, the problem lies in our limited ability thus far to
translate knowledge into broader biological principles and solutions to
challenges faced in modern agroecosystems.
CONCLUSION