Understanding Zambia's Economic Recovery Programme

November 2016
Unlocking Zambia's Potential
UNDERSTANDING ZAMBIA’S ECONOMIC
RECOVERY PROGRAMME
POLICY MONITORING AND RESEARCH CENTRE
www.pmrczambia.com | facebook.com | youtube: pmrczambia | twitter: @pmrczambia | linkedin.com

Prepared by: The Policy Monitoring and Research Centre Chileshe Chaunga
(Researcher), Miselo Bwalya (Researcher) Salim Kaunda (Head of Research Analysis)
Akabondo Kabechani (Head of Monitoring and Evaluation) Esther Nyemba (Junior
Researcher) with the support of Bernadette Deka (Executive Director) Brian Sambo
Mwila (Communication Specialist).
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by the laws of The Republic of Zambia. This electronic
representation of PMRC intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of PMRC
electronic documents to a non-PMRC website is prohibited. PMRC electronic documents are protected under copyright
law. Permission is required from PMRC to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for
commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see PMRC Permissions.
(www.pmrczambia.com/copyright).
The PMRC is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decision-making through research and analysis.
PMRC’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
ABBREVIATIONS
AG Auditor General
CSO’s Civil Society Organisations
DRM Domestic Revenue Mobilization
FDI Foreign Direct Investment
GDP Gross Domestic Product
IDA Integrated Development Approach
ICT Information and Communication Technologies
IFMIS Integrated Financial Management Informations System
NGO’s Non Governmental Organisations
MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework
MIS Management of Information System
MPSA’s Ministries, Provinces and Spending Agencies
PFM Public Financial Management
7NDP Seventh National Development Plan

UNDERSTANDING ZAMBIA‘S ECONOMIC RECOVERY
PROGRAMME

4 | Understanding Zambia’s Economic Recovery Programme
INTRODUCTIONS
On the 11th
of November 2016, the Minister of Finance, Hon. Felix Mutati MP, delivered the 2017
Budget Address to parliament and the rest of the country. The theme of the 2017 National
Budget is “Restoring Fiscal Fitness for Sustained Inclusive Growth and Development”. In order
torestoreeconomicstability,theGovernmenthasdesignedanEconomicRecoveryProgramme
dubbed “Zambia Plus”. This Programme is aimed at ensuring sustained and inclusive growth.
Zambia’s economic recovery programme ‘Zambia Plus’ is a home grown plan designed with
the objective of attaining inclusive and sustained growth by Zambians and complimented by
cooperating partners. The Zambia plus programme is anchored on fives pillars of economic
recovery namely;
I. Enhancing domestic resource mobilisation and refocusing of public spending on core
public sector mandates;
II. Scaling-upGovernment’ssocialprotectionprogrammestoshieldthemostvulnerablein
our society from negative effects of the programme;
III. Improving our economic and fiscal governance by raising the levels of accountability
and transparency in the allocation and use of public finances;
IV. Restoring credibility of the budget by minimizing unplanned expenditures and halting
the accumulation of arrears; and
V. Ensuringgreatereconomicstability,growthandjobcreationthroughpolicyconsistency
to raise confidence for sustained private sector investment.
This analysis discusses each pillar, providing the status, and recommendations on what
strategies that Government must utilize in order to restore economic stability.
PILLAR 1 PILLAR 2 PILLAR 3 PILLAR 4 PILLAR 5
PILLAR 1: EnhancingDomesticRevenueMobilisationandRefocusingofPublicSpending
on Core Public Sector Mandates
In under developed regions, especially sub-Saharan Africa, domestic resource mobilization
(DRM) has a significant international dimension. In most instances, resources lost to capital
flight and transfer pricing exceed aid flows; remittances are becoming increasingly important;
revenues from trade taxes are in decline; and aid accounts for a large (in many cases growing)
share of the government budget. The dramatic reversal of trade and financial flows during
economiccrisisthatsawaplungeincommoditypriceshasheightenedtheneedtothinkabout
more stable and sustainable modes of development finance and Zambia is not an exception

5Understanding Zambia’s Economic Recovery Programme|
to this. DRM has been a relatively neglected factor in strategy development, especially in sub-
Saharan Africa (Culpeper and Bhushan 2008, 2009, 2010).
Enhancing Institutional frameworks for domestic revenue mobilisation
Increasing the revenue GDP ratio to above 20% as purported in the 2015-2017 Medium Term
Expenditure Framework (MTEF) has eluded Zambia for some time despite the strong economic
growthregisteredduringthelastdecade.SometaxhandleslikeVAT,whichwereexpectedtogrow
in tandem with the GDP growth, remained weak (Ministry of Finance, 2016).
Improving domestic revenue mobilization remains critical for the Government’s fiscal agenda.
Effortstobroadenthetaxbasehaveencompassedawiderangeofinitiatives,focusingbothon
internal operational issues of the revenue collector and the external environment of revenue
collection, particularly the interface with tax payers. Despite the various efforts, challenges
remain for the revenue collecting institutions. These are mainly reflected as inadequacies in
administrative efficiency, limited infrastructure and lack of procedures in mobilizing domestic
resources.
Thus, ultimately even though tax revenues on the whole were above target by 4.3% in 2015,
with the contribution from mining increasing by 127.3%, other tax types including PAYE,
CustomsandExciseDutieswerefarbelowtarget.Nontaxrevenuestruggledmainlyonaccount
ofmineralroyaltyproceedswhichwerebelowtargetby-13.5%andFISPrecoverieswhichwere
below target by 66.7% (Ministry of Finance, 2016). The record of non-performance or under-
performance of the various tax types listed above is now well documented elsewhere. Based
on the evidence, we propose the following institutional reform measures for improving tax
performance:
• Supporting ZRA to reform and restrict the PAYE practice that allows returns to be made
without payments, particularly given that Section 71 of the Income tax Act stipulates that
payment shall be deemed to be made when the emolument is received.
• Supporting the reform and rationalization of the generous customs duty exemptions,
which currently significantly lower the performance of this trade tax.
• Improving the minerals diversification strategy (away from a skewed focus on copper to
balancedfocusonothermineralsthroughexplorationforandresearchanddevelopment
(R&D) in oil, natural gas, semi-precious minerals, and precious minerals (gold, diamonds,
etc.), with robust production monitoring mechanisms, including as supported by like-
minded cooperating partners.
• Supportingtheeliminationofcashfromthepaymentcycleandtheestablishingaholistic
improvement in revenue collections through social transformation that moves society
towards widely using emerging information and communication technologies (ICTs) to
make electronic (mobile phone, computer, etc.) payments for goods and services (in line
withthePresident’sOpeningAddressoftheFirstSessionoftheTwelfthNationalAssembly
in October 2016).

• Ensuring the establishment of robust consultation and dialogue mechanisms and
arrangements, which are weaved into the processes of tax policy formulation, revenue
forecasting, and general economic policy making.
Refocusing of public spending by reducing non-priority infrastructure spending
Infrastructure is critical for the provision of affordable, efficient, reliable and high quality
services like energy, transportation, finance, telecommunication, health, education and skills
development services, water and sanitation, and many others. It helps with reducing the costs
of production and of doing business.
Infrastructure development requires careful long-term planning and budgeting; it requires
extensiveprojectappraisalsthattakefullaccountoftheavailabilityoflongtermfinancing.The
government should not make capital project decisions based on short-term considerations
unless these are of an emergency nature. For example, going forward the unplanned road
infrastructure spending of 2015 (Figure 2) should not be allowed to happen again. As such,
the reduction in the year-to-date (January to August 2016) spending on roads by 60% is
commendable; it resulting in a reduced share of roads spending from 13% in the approved
2016 budget to 5% in the total year-to-date expenses. The precedence of reducing spending on
roads, especially the unplanned road spending should be maintained and possibly enhanced.
The government should consider all infrastructure projects only on the basis of full project
appraisals, prioritizing high economic return project in energy and other services; and should
carefully match the projects with adequate term financing from affordable (preferably
developmental and concessional) sources. The government should devise a National
Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2017-2021 that will be part of the Seventh National Development
Plan. This will bring together all of the government’s plans and resource estimates (by source)
for economic infrastructure development over the next five years
PILLAR 2: Scaling-up the Government’s social protection programmes to shield the
most vulnerable in our society from the negative effects of the programme;
It is encouraging to note that Government has recognised that the removal of subsidies can
harm the poor and vulnerable in society, as they are least able to adjust. The second pillar of
the economic recovery plan is an effort to ensure the poor are protected and empowered. This
pillarseekstoincreasebudgetaryallocationtosocialprotection.Thescopeofsocialprotection
inZambiaincludesdestitutehouseholds,householdsheadedbychildrenandchildrenwithout
adult care, street children, the aged, incapacitated and households that are not able to meet
their own needs due to various severe states.

In an effort to actualize the second pillar of Zambia’s Economic Recovery Programme,
Government increased funding to social protection to about 2.7 billion Kwacha in the 2017
National Budget from about 1.3 billion Kwacha in the 2016 National Budget. This represents
an 87% increment. Specifically, this increase takes into account the rise in the number of
beneficiariesontheSocialCashTransferProgramme.Thenumberofbeneficiarieswillincrease
from 242,000 to over 500,000 and monthly benefits (cash) will rise by 28%. This increase is also
targeted at scaling up the Home Grown School Feeding Programme to enhance the learning
abilities of school going children, increase their attendance and combat malnutrition.
There are various challenges and hurdles that must be overcome to ensure government
successfully up scales and effectively implements social protection programs in light of
austerity measures.
1. The completion of effective and efficient Management of Information Systems (MIS)
and monitoring and evaluation systems. The transition to e-payments will facilitate for
effective monitoring and reduce the administrative costs incurred in the implementation
of various social protection programmes.
2. Assessment of various poverty reduction programmes implemented by all Government
ministries in partnership with Civil Society Organisations (CSO’s), Non Governmental
Organizations (NGO’s), research institutions and Developing Partners. The assessments
will provide for reallocation of funds to high impact poverty reduction programs and
provide for reforms in other programs.
Government must ensure the effective and efficient implementation of the special financing
mechanisms for funds allocated to social protection programs to prevent delayed payments.
PILLAR 3: Improving our economic and fiscal governance by raising the levels of
accountability and transparency in the allocation and use of public finances;
It is encouraging to note that the Seventh National Development Plan (7th
NDP) is using an
Integrated Development Approach (IDA) for national planning. Further, the National Planning
and Budgeting Policy needs to be fully implemented if we are to realize a coordinated
and integrated national development planning and budgeting system that is responsive,
transparent, accountable and results oriented. It is also important to note that in order
to promote accountability and transparency, major steps in the decentralization agenda
should be undertaken so that some powers and privileges are transferred to the periphery.
Decentralization is a pathway to the notion of equal distribution of wealth as this would allow
the citizenry to be part of the development process even at a more advanced level.

In promoting transparency, we need to understand that decentralization has two principal
components: participation and accountability. Participation is chiefly concerned with
increasing the role of citizens in choosing their local leaders (providing inputs into local
governance). Accountability constitutes the other side of the process; it is the degree to which
local governments have to explain or justify what is being done and what has not been done.
Onanotheraspect,Inpromotingeconomicandfiscaltransparency,wecannotoveremphasize
somechallengesthathavebeenidentifiedintheAuditorGeneralsreportrelatingtoinadequate
funding, shortfall in human resources needs and weak internal controls. The Public Finance
Act No. 15 of 2004 provides for the formation of Audit Committees in all Ministries, Provinces
and Spending Agencies (MPSAs). However, the Auditor Generals report (2015) reports that;
although formed in the MPSAs, most of the Audit Committees have not been operational and
thereforehavenotprovidedtherequiredoversightonenhancingCorporateGovernanceinthe
MPSAs.
Having observed the Auditor General (AG) report in the past years, we notice that “
Unvounchered expenditure” has continued to be the highest query. In the 2015 AG report,
Unvouchered expenditure amounted to K349,306,160. As a country, we cannot continue to
observe reoccurring queries every year, to this effect; focus should be on internal controls
within the MPSAs.
Inordertoestablishtrust,itisimportantthatthegovernmentprovidesaccurateandcomplete
information on assets and liabilities as well as revenues and expenses in a timely manner.
Providing complete information on all transactions will demonstrate accountability. For
citizens to fully hold Government accountable, there must be constant flow of information
from the Government relating to finances to development delivery.
Issues that need to be addressed: Auditor Generals Report: Promoting transparency and
accountability
1. Access to information: the Auditor General’s report needs to be made more available.
Accessibility of the report still remains minimal.
2. Inadequate skills and resources: there are some inadequacies in audit tools and logistics
as well as a lack of technical knowledge in certain areas in the Auditor General auditing
process.Insomeinstances,therehavebeendelaysandchallengesintheimplementation
of the Integrated Financial Management Information System (IFMIS).
3. Poor Internal Audits: provided for in The “Public Finance Act 2004” internal auditing
procedures in Zambia have remained inadequate and this has been observed by the AG’s
office.
4. Lack of Sanctions And Follow- Up: Zambia experiences a fragile enforcement of sanctions
anddisciplinaryactionagainstcontraventions,resultinginacontinuationofinfringement
actions as no effective deterrent is in place. In some instances, there is also a lack of
supervision, checking and monitoring by controlling officers to ensure compliance with
regulationssurroundingprocessesandproceduresinthefirstplace.Thereisalsoalackof

followuptoensuretheseactionsandrecommendationsareimplementedandnecessary
sanctions or recoveries of monies carried out.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. IMPROVED ACCESS AND AWARENESS: Public documents such as the National
Budget and Auditor Generals report should be freely available to the public, with access
provided online and in hard copies. This will improve society’s awareness of financial
matters and public expenditure, and promote greater transparency and accountability
for public officers.
2. GAP ANALYSIS OF FUNDING, SKILLS AND RESOURCES: Anassessmentneeds
to be undertaken on the current funding needs and shortages, the staff levels and skills
availability. Assessment should include a review of electronic systems in place, including
IFMIS, to determine its success, resources to implement the system and future needs to
improve implementation.
3. REVIEW OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AUDIT LINKAGES: A review of the
role of internal and external auditors needs to be undertaken, to determine key areas
for improving linkages between the two, potential training needs, and measures to
increase awareness on the role and importance of these audits within departments and
ministries. The review also needs to consider internal and external audit processes, and
key constraints affecting these.
4. IDENTIFICATION OF ACTION IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISMS: A review of
processes to access the implementation of recommendations and action items following
the PAC hearings need to be undertaken. Members of the Auditor General Office, the
PAC and Parliament need to collaborate to identify appropriate mechanisms to monitor
and review actions. Discussions need to identify roles and responsibilities, reporting
mechanisms and sanctions for officers failing to implement recommendations.
PILLAR 4
The fourth pillar of the economic recovery programme that aims at restoring the credibility of
the budget entails better planning, and adherence to expenditure plans and improvement of
the quality of Government’s spending. The government is planning to enforce measures that
will enable the budget support economic recovery in the country by spending with available
resources and spending on projects that will foster growth in the country. In its current status
the country has several fiscal challenges that have led to debt accumulation and slow growth.

The continued accumulation of arrears and unplanned expenditure has led to the following:
The accumulation of government expenditure arrears is one of the most common problems
in Public Financial Management (PFM) and it is a persistent problem among African countries.
Thesearrearsarefinancialobligationsthathavebeenincurredbyanylevelofthepublicsector
for which payments have not been made by the due date such as payment of social security
benefits and payments of road construction which are the most common type of arrears in
Zambia. These arrears distort the planned implementation of the budget and negatively
impactonthegovernment’sfinancesandabilitytodeliveressentialpublicservices.Inaddition,
incomplete information on arrears presents a risk that the real size of the government’s deficit
is concealed and the level of its liabilities understated.
On the other hand In the 2017 budget speech the Minister of Finance disclosed that the
unplanned expenditure in the country has led to a cash deficit of around 3% of GDP especially
from unplanned expenditure in fuel and electricity subsidies and the various road and
infrastructure development projects of which most of them were not planned for and were
financed by borrowed money.
In order for the government to achieve pillar number IV the following measures have been put
in place in the 2017 budget.
1. Dismantling arrears to suppliers and contractors and immediately prevent the
accumulation of new arrears through effective implementation of commitment control
systems. To realise this the government has already started paying contractors money
owed to them. As of December 2016, K190 million was released to pay contractors of
which K 65 million was paid to the contractors working on the Kitwe- Chingola road.
2. Restrict new capital projects and major equipment procurements until all on-going
projects are completed and slow down on capital infrastructure projects which are debt
financed through costly borrowing.
3. Restore budget credibility and enhance transparency and accountability in accordance
withtheprovisionsoftheConstitutionrelatingtosupplementaryandexcessexpenditure.
This can be realised if there is enforcement in the use of the revised legislation on the
management of funds to ensure that those in charge of prosecution of those under audit
query enforce appropriate disciplinary action.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Accumulation of arrears as seen poses a challenge to development, it is in this view that
there is need for a comprehensive, transparent and credible strategy for controlling and
preventingfuturearrears.Thiscanbedonebyestablishingmechanismsthatdonot allow
Ministries, provinces and spending agencies (MPSAs) to incur arrears and expect the
government to release money to clear the arrears instead they should spend within their
current resources. The country should analyse the trends in arrears over the years, the
sectors and agencies that are prone to incurring arrears, and the main causes of arrears

accumulationsothattheinformationfeedsintothedevelopmentofacounterstrategyto
prevent arrears.
2. There is need for timely release of allocated funds as indicated in the budget by
government to reduce the accumulation of arrears
PILLAR 5: Ensuring greater economic stability, growth and job creation through policy
consistency to raise confidence for sustained private sector investment
The 5th
Pillar of the economic program focuses on ensuring greater economic stability through
policy consistency so as to improve private sector participation. Chiefly, the private sector
must be segmented into local and foreign private investors and policies must be tailored to
ensure that the local private sector become as competitive as their foreign counterparts. Tax
incentives are one area that have been used to attract FDI, however, this has been done at the
expense of the local private sector that have been made less competitive. Despite numerous
government programs to support private sector development, a significant majority of local
investorsarestillclassifiedasSmallMediumEnterprises(SMEs).Accordingtothe1996Baseline
Survey on micro and small enterprises in Zambia, the sector consists of approximately 97% of
all enterprises in the country (Parker, 1996), there has been little change to date.
Hence, in a bid to enhance economic growth, Government must refocus policy to ensure that
the local private player become more competitive, this should be done by restructuring tax
incentives to cater for the needs of local investors. A functional local private sector has the
ability to provide employment, improve the terms of trade through import substitution, which
wouldalsoleadtostrengtheningofthelocalcurrencyandrestoringthetradebalance.Further,
a strengthened local private sector will lead to reduced financial leakages that are as a result
of over participation of foreign private investors in key economic activities that come at a huge
cost to the nation.
Policy consistency is another key component of achieving the economic stability. The mining
sector which is the largest contributor to foreign export earnings has been particularly
challenging to this regard. The sector is vulnerable to changes on the international market
and the Government in a bid to respond to these changes that affect output and revenue, has
revised the tax regime three times in the last three years (2014 – removal of corporate income
taxonprofits;2015–re-introductionofcorporateincometax;2016:-flatmineralroyaltyrates).
While it is important for the Government to be responsive, such moves in the long run make a
sector unpredictable.
According to the World Bank’s Foreign Direct Investment Survey (2013), a stable social
and political environment is ranked 2nd
in the determinants of FDI while national taxes are

ranked 11th
. This reiterates the need for policy consistency as well as a predictable economic
framework as these enable investors to safeguard their investments. Further, it also provides
insight on the importance of tax regimes. The survey indicates that taxes may not necessarily
beofhighpriorityindeterminingFDI.Thusinvestmentpolicyshouldfocusonensuringastable
investment environment as opposed to the proliferation of tax incentives that undermine the
efforts of local investors and erode the tax base.
In the 2017 Budget, Government has committed to supporting the creation of at least 100,000
decentjobs.Jobcreationimprovestheproductivecapacityoftheeconomyandimprovessocial
welfare. The Government must let the private sector lead the process of job creation, policy
must focus on creating an enabling environment for the private sector to thrive. Strategies
should include reducing domestic borrowing, as this tends to crowd out private investment.
However, we note that Government through the budget has indicated that it will maintain
domesticborrowingtonomorethan2%ofGDP.Lastly,thereisneedtofurtherreducethecost
of doing business by simplifying statutory requirements and providing the private sector with
the appropriate incentives and conditions to enable them to meet Governments job creation
targets.

Unlocking Zambia's Potential
Correspondence on this Budget Analysis can be sent to:
info@pmrczambia.net
Policy Monitoring and Research Centre (PMRC)
Plot No. 32 Sable Road, corner Bishops and Sable Roads, Kabulonga, Lusaka, Zambia
Private Bag KL 10
Tel: +260 211 268 385 | +260 979 015 660
www.pmrczambia.com

Understanding Zambia's Economic Recovery Programme

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (12)

Similar to Understanding Zambia's Economic Recovery Programme (20)

Understanding Zambia's Economic Recovery Programme