SlideShare a Scribd company logo
VALIDATION AND CALIBRATION OF HPLC
1
BY- Sakshi Garg
M.Pharm(Pharmaceutics)
Validation, USP:
“Validation of an analytical procedure is the process by which it
is established, by laboratory studies, that the performance
characteristics of the procedure meet the requirements for the
intended analytical applications.”
Validation Protocol:
A written plan stating how validation will be conducted and
defining acceptance criteria. For example, the protocol for a
manufacturing process identifies processing equipment,
critical process parameters/operating ranges, product
characteristics, sampling, test data to be collected, number of
validation runs, and acceptable test results.
Equipment Validation:
Demonstrate that equipment used in validation studies is suitable
for use and is comparable to equipment used for routine analysis. 2
•Qualification: Action of proving and documenting that
equipment or ancillary systems are properly installed, work
correctly, and actually lead to the expected results.
•Qualification is part of validation, but the individual qualification
steps alone do not constitute process validation.
Parts Of The Qualification:
The entire process typically consists of four parts:
•Design qualification (DQ),
•Installation qualification(IQ),
•Operational qualification (OQ), and
•Performance qualification (PQ).
3
A schematic diagram illustrating the timeline and documents in the
various stages in HPLC system qualification.
4
AssayImpuritiesIdentification
limit
quantitat
ive
+-+-Accuracy
+-+-Precision
++++Specificity
-+--Detection Limit
--+-Quantitation Limit
+-+-Linearity
+-+-Range
++++Robustness
Validation Characteristics
5
Basic Parameters for the Validation of Method:
6
Accuracy:
Definition: The accuracy of an analytical procedure expresses the closeness of
agreement between the value that is accepted either as a conventional true
value or as an accepted reference value and the value found.
How To Determine??
• Known amounts of Related substances and the drug substance in placebo are
spiked to prepare an accuracy sample of known concentration of Related
substance.
• According to the ICH, accuracy should be determined using a minimum of
nine determinations over a minimum of three concentration levels covering
the range(from 50% of the ICH reporting level to 150% of the proposed shelf
life specification of the related substances) specified.
e.g. Level Accuracy
125% 99.6 +/- 0.2%
75% 100.3 +/- 0.8%
25% 99.2 +/- 0.7%
7
(Reference: IJPSR
Determination of Voglibose by HPLC and validation of method)
•Intrinsic Accuracy:
Intrinsic accuracy indicates the bias caused by sample matrix and sample
preparation.
•Overall Accuracy:
oMatrix effect
o Sample preparation
o Calculation error
%relative substance(calculated)
•Overall accuracy = -----------------------------------------
%relative substance (theory)
8
Precision :
Definition : The Precision is a measure of the ability of the method to generate
reproducible results. The precision of a method is evaluated for repeatability,
intermediate precision, and reproducibility.
•Repeatability is a measure of the ability of the method to generate similar
results for multiple preparations of the same homogeneous sample by one
analyst using the same instrument in a short time duration (e.g., on the same
day). For instance, method repeatability for pharmaceutical assays may be
measured by making six sample determinations at 100% concentration, or by
preparing three samples at 80, 100, and 120% concentration levels each.
•Intermediate precision is a measure of the variability of method results where
samples are tested and compared using different analysts, different equipment,
and on different days, etc. This study is a measure of the intra-laboratory
variability and is a measure of the precision that can be expected within a
laboratory.
•Reproducibility is the precision obtained when samples are prepared and
compared between different testing sites. Method reproducibility is often
assessed during collaborative studies at the time of technology or method
transfer. %RSD= (s/µ)*100 9
Limit of Detection (LOD, DL)
– The LOD of an analytical procedure is the lowest amount
of analyte in sample which can be detected but not
necessarily quantitated as an exact value.
• Determination is usually based on
– Signal to noise ratio (~3:1) (baseline noise)
or
– Standard deviation of response (s) and Slope (S)
• 3.3 s/S
– SNR = H/h
Where H = height of the peak corresponding to the component
h = absolute value of the largest noise fluctuation from
the baseline of the chromatogram of a blank
solution
10
Limit of Quantitation (LOQ, QL)
– The LOQ is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample
which can be quantitatively determined with suitable
precision and accuracy
– The quantitation limit is used particularly for the determination of
impurities and/or degradation products
• Determination is usually based on
– Signal to noise ratio (~10:1) (baseline noise)
or
– Standard deviation of response (s) and Slope (S)
• 10 s/S
- The Quantitation limit of a method is affected by both the detector
sensitivity and the accuracy of sample preparation.
11
Noise
LOD
Signal to Noise = 3:1
LOQ
Signal to Noise = 10:1
LOD, LOQ and Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR)
Range:
ICH Definition: The range of an analytical procedure is the interval
between the upper and lower concentrations of analytes in the for
which it has been demonstrated that the analytical procedure has a
suitable level of precision, accuracy, and linearity.
Range For Different Tests:
• Assay
80 to 120% of test concentration
• Content uniformity
70 to 130% of test concentration
• Dissolution
Q-20% to 120%
• Impurities
Reporting level – 120% of specification limit (with respect to test
concentration of API)
• Assay & Impurities
Reporting level to 120% of assay specification
13
Linearity:
Definition : Linearity of an analytical procedure is its ability
(within a given range) to obtain test results which are
directly proportional to the concentration of analytes in the
sample.
•If there is a linear relationship test results should be
evaluated by appropriate statistical methods like,
•Correlation coefficient
•Y-intercept
•Slope of regression line
•Plot of the Data
•Method To Determine Linearity
•Direct Weigh Method
•Dilution Method
14
Linearity Ranges and Acceptance Criteria for Various
Pharmaceutical Methods
15
SYSTEM SUITABILITY TESTING (SST)
• System suitability testing (SST) is used to verify resolution,
column efficiency, and repeatability of the analysis system to
ensure its adequacy for performing the intended application
on a daily basis.
Which Parameters??
•Number of theoretical plates (efficiency)
•Capacity factor,
•Separation (relative retention)
•Resolution,
•Tailing factor
•Relative Standard Deviation (Precision)
16
•Plate number or number of theoretical plates (n)
n=L/H, where L is Length of Column
H is HETP or height of one theoretical plate
•Capacity factor (capacity ratio) k
k’= tr-tm/tm where tr is retention time
tm is dead time
•Separation Factor (relative retention)
α=k1/k2 where k1 is capacity factor of compound a
and k2 is capacity factor of compound b
•Tailing factor ,T
T=W/2f where W is width at 5% at peak height
f, distance between max and leading edge of the peak
17
18
Robustness :
Definition : Robustness is reliability of an analytical procedure with
respect to deliberate variations in method parameters.
•If measurements are susceptible to variations in analytical conditions
the analytical conditions should be suitably controlled or a
precautionary statement should be included in the procedure.
•PARAMETERS TO BE EVALUATED FOR ROBUSTNESS
•Column consistency
•Three columns packed by bonded phases from three different
silica lots
•Mobile Phase
• pH (±0.1–0.2 units)
• Buffer concentration (±5–10mM)
• Percentage organic modifier (±1–2% MP)
•Sample
•Injection volume or sample concentration
• Solvent strength for the final solution
•Column temperature (±5°C)
•Detector wavelength (±3nm) 19
Selectivity and Specificity :
•Selectivity is the ability to measure accurately and specifically the
analyte in the presence of components that may be expected to be
present in the sample matrix.
•Specificity for an assay ensures that the signal measured comes from
the substance of interest, and that there is no interference from
excipient s and/or degradation products and/or impurities.
20
Calibration:
Definition (ICH): The demonstration that a particular
instrument or device produces results within specified limits
by comparison with those produced by a reference or
traceable standard over an appropriate range of
measurements.
Various Calibration parameters for HPLC are:
•Flow rate accuracy (Pump Module)
• Injector accuracy
•Carryover
•System Precision
•Wavelength accuracy
•Detector linearity
• Injector linearity
• Gradient Performance Check
• Column oven temperature accuracy
21
Flow Rate Accuracy:
1. Prime all the solvent lines with water.
2. Set the flow rate to 0.500 ml/m.
3.Wait for about 15 m to stabilize the system and ensure that the pressure is stable.
4.Insert the outlet tubing into a 10 ml volumetric flask and start the stop watch
simultaneously.
5. Stop the stopwatch when the lower meniscus reaches the 10 ml mark on the
flask.
6. Record the elapsed time.
7. Similarly check the flow for 1.0 ml/m and 2.0 ml/m.
Acceptance criteria:
The time taken to collect the water should be with in ± 2.0% of the actual value.
22
Pressure Test :
•The performance of the HPLC pump depends on the proper functioning
of the check valves and the proper connection of the tubing.
•For pump systems that output the pressure reading in the pump head
over time, a simple pressure test can be a useful qualitative test to check
the condition of the check valves and to determine whether or not there
are any leaks in the system.
•The first step of the pressure test is to plug the outlet of the pump using
a dead-nut and by setting the automatic pump shutdown pressure to
6,000 psi.
•The pump-head pressure signal output is connected to a recorder.
Pressurize the pump by pumping methanol at 1 mL/min. The pressure
inside the pump head increases quickly as the outlet of the pump is
blocked. As the pressure increases to about 3,000 psi, the flow rate is
reduced to 0.1 mL/min.
•The pressure will gradually rise to the shutdown pressure if the check
valves are able to hold the mobile phase in the pump chamber as would
be normally expected . If the check valve is not functioning properly, the
pressure will fluctuate at about 3,000 psi instead of reaching the
shutdown pressure.
23
24
Injector Accuracy:
1. Connect the pump and detector inlet with union.
2. Prepare mobile phase consisting of a mixture of water and Methanol (70:30)
3. Set a flow rate of 0.5 ml/m and a run time of 1 m.
4. Set the column temperature at 25± 2°C.
5.Fill a standard HPLC vial to 2/3rd with water. Seal the vial properly with a
cap.
6. Weigh the vial and record the weight as W1 grams.
7. Place the vial in the chromatographic system and perform 6 injections of
50μl volume from this vial.
8. Weigh the vial again and note the weigh after the injections as W2 grams.
9. Calculate the mean volume injected per injection as follows:
•Mean injected volume (μl) = (W1 – W2) × 100/6
•Acceptance criteria: The mean injected volume should be 50.0±1.0 μl.
25
Reference:
•JBSR (Journal)
•Analytical Method Validation and Instrument Performance Verification
-Herman Lam and Y.C. Lec
Carryover :
•Small amounts of analyte may get carried over from the previous
injection and contaminate the next sample to be injected.
•The carryover will affect the accurate quantitation of the subsequent
sample.
•The problem is more serious when a dilute sample is injected after a
concentrated sample.
•In order to avoid cross contamination from the previous sample
injection, all the parts in the injector that come into contact with the
sample (the injection loop, the injection needle and the needle seat)
have to be cleaned effectively after the injection.
•The effectiveness of the cleaning can be evaluated by injecting a blank
after a sample that contains a high concentration of analyte.
•The response of the analyte found in the blank sample expressed as a
percentage of the response of the concentrated sample can be used to
determine the level of carryover. 26
Detector Module:
(A)UV-Visible Detector Module:
•Wavelength Accuracy
1. Wavelength accuracy is defined as the deviation of the
wavelength reading at an absorption or emission band from the
known wavelength of the band.
2. The deuterium line at 656 nm and the absorption bands at 418,
453 and 536 nm in a Holmium oxide filter are often used.
(B) PDA Detector Accuracy:
•Select 3D mode and set the wavelength range as 200-400nm.
•Inject 20 μl Holonium oxide of standard preparation once into the
chromatographic system.
•Extract and record the chromatograms at wavelengths of 202 to 208nm
with an interval of 1nm and at 269 to 275 nm with an interval of 1nm.
•Note down the height or absorbance.
Acceptance criteria: The maximum absorbance should be at 205±2nm
and 272±2nm.
27
28
You can Calibrate the PDA Detector for 5 Parameters:
1-Baseline Noise and PDA Drift.
2- Your Lamp Intensity.
3- You have to check for the Wavelength Accuracy.
• You can inject Pyrene with Methanol as eluent at a flow of 1 ml/min.
• The characteristically maximum of pyrene is determined at 333 nm and
compared to a theoretical value.
4- Lastly- You must check your PDA's Linearity
you can inject 5 caffeine solutions at different concentrations.
Concentrations and peak heights can be represented in a graph. The
regression coefficient of the resulting line and the deviations from it
indicate indicates the linearity- Usually you R square value should be
above 99.90% .
Automated Detector Calibration
From column
To waste
Filter with a known
Absorbance(s)
Flow cell
29
From column
To waste
Filter with a known
Absorbance(s)
Flow cell
30
31
Noise and Drift :
•Drift: upward &/or downward movement of base line.
•Noise : any unwanted signal recorded by the detector.
•Electronic, pump and photometric noise, poor lamp intensity,
dirty flow cell, and thermal instability contribute to the overall
noise and drift in the detector.
•Excessive noise can reduce the sensitivity of the detector and
hence affect the quantitation of low-level analytes.
•Detector drift may affect the baseline determination and peak
integration.
•Overcomes for avoiding Noise and Drift:
•The detector should be warmed up prior to the test, and any
temperature fluctuations should be avoided during the test.
•For a dynamic testing condition, methanol is passed through the
flow cell at 1 mL/min.
•A backpressure of about 500 psi is maintained to prevent bubble
formation.
32
Column Heating Module :
•The efficiency of a HPLC column varies with column temperature.
•capacity factor k’ decreases with temperature, and hence the
retention of the analysis decreases with temperature .
•Retention drops by 1 to 3% for each increase of 1◦C.
How To Check??
•The temperature accuracy of the column heater is evaluated by
placing a calibrated thermometer in the column compartment to
measure the actual compartment temperature.
•The thermometer readings are compared to the preset
temperature at 40 ◦C and 60◦C.
33
34
35
References:
1. Morden HPLC by Michel Dong, Chapter 9.
2. Analytical Method Validation and Instrument Performance
Verification by Herman Lam and Y.C. Lec, Chapter 3 and Chapter 11.
3. Net surf.
•Scientist solution.com
•Chemicalforum.com
•Chemistpub.org
4. Pharmaceutical Journals,
•IJPSR
•JBSR

More Related Content

PPTX
PHARMACEUTICAL CALIBRATION, QUALIFICATION AND VALIDATION: AN INTRODUCTION
PPTX
Impurity Profile
PPTX
CLINICAL TRIALS OF MEDICAL DEVICES
PPTX
Calibration of IR spectrophotometer ppt
PPTX
Calibaration and validation of hplc
PPTX
Hurdle technology ppt
PPT
Mass Spectroscopy and its applications
PPT
Analytical method validation
PHARMACEUTICAL CALIBRATION, QUALIFICATION AND VALIDATION: AN INTRODUCTION
Impurity Profile
CLINICAL TRIALS OF MEDICAL DEVICES
Calibration of IR spectrophotometer ppt
Calibaration and validation of hplc
Hurdle technology ppt
Mass Spectroscopy and its applications
Analytical method validation

What's hot (20)

PPT
analytical method validation and validation of hplc
PPTX
General considerations and method development in ce,
PPTX
Stability testing protocols
PPTX
Analytical method validation as per ich and usp
PPTX
USFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation
PPTX
Analytical method development,validation by uv spectroscopy
PPTX
HPLC Trouble Shotting
PPTX
extraction of drug from biological matrix.pptx
PPT
Analytical methods validation as per ich & usp
PPTX
Calibration of analytical instruments
PDF
Bioanalytical Method Validation
PPTX
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
PPT
Analytical method validation
PPTX
bio analytical method validation usfda guidlines
PPTX
HPLC method development
PPTX
Theory of high performance liquid chromatography ppt
PPTX
Calibration - UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Gas Chromatograph, IR spectroph...
PPTX
PPTX
Qualification of instrumets
PPT
HPLC validation.ppt
analytical method validation and validation of hplc
General considerations and method development in ce,
Stability testing protocols
Analytical method validation as per ich and usp
USFDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation
Analytical method development,validation by uv spectroscopy
HPLC Trouble Shotting
extraction of drug from biological matrix.pptx
Analytical methods validation as per ich & usp
Calibration of analytical instruments
Bioanalytical Method Validation
Calibration and Qualification of Analytical Instruments
Analytical method validation
bio analytical method validation usfda guidlines
HPLC method development
Theory of high performance liquid chromatography ppt
Calibration - UV VIS Spectrophotometer, HPLC, Gas Chromatograph, IR spectroph...
Qualification of instrumets
HPLC validation.ppt
Ad

Similar to validation and calibration of HPLC (20)

PPTX
Analytical Method Validation.pptx
PPTX
Vallidation 25
PPTX
ICP QC protocol
PPTX
Qualification of HPLC & LCMS.pptxfjddjdjdhdjdjj
PPTX
Qualification of HPLC & LCMS.pptdjdjdjdjfjkfx
PDF
Analytical Method Validation basics by Dr. A. Amsavel
PPT
Validation of Analytical method.ppt
PDF
Validation of Analytical Procedures.pdf
PPTX
Analytical Method Validation
PPTX
Analytical method validation
PPT
2. Quality Control Notes
PPT
Analytical method validation
PPTX
Analytical Method Validations & Detailed Method Validation Parameters
PPTX
Accuracy and precision presentation
PPTX
Analytical mehod validation explained sadasiva
PPTX
Analytical mehod validation explained sadasiva
PPT
Method-Validation-HPLC-case-study
PPT
Seminar by prakash on validation
PDF
Analytical method validation by manoj ingale(best ppts)
PPTX
Analytical method validation
Analytical Method Validation.pptx
Vallidation 25
ICP QC protocol
Qualification of HPLC & LCMS.pptxfjddjdjdhdjdjj
Qualification of HPLC & LCMS.pptdjdjdjdjfjkfx
Analytical Method Validation basics by Dr. A. Amsavel
Validation of Analytical method.ppt
Validation of Analytical Procedures.pdf
Analytical Method Validation
Analytical method validation
2. Quality Control Notes
Analytical method validation
Analytical Method Validations & Detailed Method Validation Parameters
Accuracy and precision presentation
Analytical mehod validation explained sadasiva
Analytical mehod validation explained sadasiva
Method-Validation-HPLC-case-study
Seminar by prakash on validation
Analytical method validation by manoj ingale(best ppts)
Analytical method validation
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Intl J Gynecology Obste - 2021 - Melamed - FIGO International Federation o...
PPT
Obstructive sleep apnea in orthodontics treatment
PPT
CHAPTER FIVE. '' Association in epidemiological studies and potential errors
PPTX
SKIN Anatomy and physiology and associated diseases
PPTX
Electromyography (EMG) in Physiotherapy: Principles, Procedure & Clinical App...
PPTX
Gastroschisis- Clinical Overview 18112311
PPT
1b - INTRODUCTION TO EPIDEMIOLOGY (comm med).ppt
PPTX
Respiratory drugs, drugs acting on the respi system
PPTX
Fundamentals of human energy transfer .pptx
PPTX
POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME.pptx by Dr( med) Charles Amoateng
PPTX
Uterus anatomy embryology, and clinical aspects
PPT
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
PPT
Breast Cancer management for medicsl student.ppt
PPTX
Pathophysiology And Clinical Features Of Peripheral Nervous System .pptx
PPTX
Neuropathic pain.ppt treatment managment
PDF
Handout_ NURS 220 Topic 10-Abnormal Pregnancy.pdf
PPTX
Imaging of parasitic D. Case Discussions.pptx
DOCX
RUHS II MBBS Microbiology Paper-II with Answer Key | 6th August 2025 (New Sch...
PPTX
JUVENILE NASOPHARYNGEAL ANGIOFIBROMA.pptx
PPTX
Note on Abortion.pptx for the student note
Intl J Gynecology Obste - 2021 - Melamed - FIGO International Federation o...
Obstructive sleep apnea in orthodontics treatment
CHAPTER FIVE. '' Association in epidemiological studies and potential errors
SKIN Anatomy and physiology and associated diseases
Electromyography (EMG) in Physiotherapy: Principles, Procedure & Clinical App...
Gastroschisis- Clinical Overview 18112311
1b - INTRODUCTION TO EPIDEMIOLOGY (comm med).ppt
Respiratory drugs, drugs acting on the respi system
Fundamentals of human energy transfer .pptx
POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME.pptx by Dr( med) Charles Amoateng
Uterus anatomy embryology, and clinical aspects
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
Breast Cancer management for medicsl student.ppt
Pathophysiology And Clinical Features Of Peripheral Nervous System .pptx
Neuropathic pain.ppt treatment managment
Handout_ NURS 220 Topic 10-Abnormal Pregnancy.pdf
Imaging of parasitic D. Case Discussions.pptx
RUHS II MBBS Microbiology Paper-II with Answer Key | 6th August 2025 (New Sch...
JUVENILE NASOPHARYNGEAL ANGIOFIBROMA.pptx
Note on Abortion.pptx for the student note

validation and calibration of HPLC

  • 1. VALIDATION AND CALIBRATION OF HPLC 1 BY- Sakshi Garg M.Pharm(Pharmaceutics)
  • 2. Validation, USP: “Validation of an analytical procedure is the process by which it is established, by laboratory studies, that the performance characteristics of the procedure meet the requirements for the intended analytical applications.” Validation Protocol: A written plan stating how validation will be conducted and defining acceptance criteria. For example, the protocol for a manufacturing process identifies processing equipment, critical process parameters/operating ranges, product characteristics, sampling, test data to be collected, number of validation runs, and acceptable test results. Equipment Validation: Demonstrate that equipment used in validation studies is suitable for use and is comparable to equipment used for routine analysis. 2
  • 3. •Qualification: Action of proving and documenting that equipment or ancillary systems are properly installed, work correctly, and actually lead to the expected results. •Qualification is part of validation, but the individual qualification steps alone do not constitute process validation. Parts Of The Qualification: The entire process typically consists of four parts: •Design qualification (DQ), •Installation qualification(IQ), •Operational qualification (OQ), and •Performance qualification (PQ). 3
  • 4. A schematic diagram illustrating the timeline and documents in the various stages in HPLC system qualification. 4
  • 6. Basic Parameters for the Validation of Method: 6
  • 7. Accuracy: Definition: The accuracy of an analytical procedure expresses the closeness of agreement between the value that is accepted either as a conventional true value or as an accepted reference value and the value found. How To Determine?? • Known amounts of Related substances and the drug substance in placebo are spiked to prepare an accuracy sample of known concentration of Related substance. • According to the ICH, accuracy should be determined using a minimum of nine determinations over a minimum of three concentration levels covering the range(from 50% of the ICH reporting level to 150% of the proposed shelf life specification of the related substances) specified. e.g. Level Accuracy 125% 99.6 +/- 0.2% 75% 100.3 +/- 0.8% 25% 99.2 +/- 0.7% 7 (Reference: IJPSR Determination of Voglibose by HPLC and validation of method)
  • 8. •Intrinsic Accuracy: Intrinsic accuracy indicates the bias caused by sample matrix and sample preparation. •Overall Accuracy: oMatrix effect o Sample preparation o Calculation error %relative substance(calculated) •Overall accuracy = ----------------------------------------- %relative substance (theory) 8
  • 9. Precision : Definition : The Precision is a measure of the ability of the method to generate reproducible results. The precision of a method is evaluated for repeatability, intermediate precision, and reproducibility. •Repeatability is a measure of the ability of the method to generate similar results for multiple preparations of the same homogeneous sample by one analyst using the same instrument in a short time duration (e.g., on the same day). For instance, method repeatability for pharmaceutical assays may be measured by making six sample determinations at 100% concentration, or by preparing three samples at 80, 100, and 120% concentration levels each. •Intermediate precision is a measure of the variability of method results where samples are tested and compared using different analysts, different equipment, and on different days, etc. This study is a measure of the intra-laboratory variability and is a measure of the precision that can be expected within a laboratory. •Reproducibility is the precision obtained when samples are prepared and compared between different testing sites. Method reproducibility is often assessed during collaborative studies at the time of technology or method transfer. %RSD= (s/µ)*100 9
  • 10. Limit of Detection (LOD, DL) – The LOD of an analytical procedure is the lowest amount of analyte in sample which can be detected but not necessarily quantitated as an exact value. • Determination is usually based on – Signal to noise ratio (~3:1) (baseline noise) or – Standard deviation of response (s) and Slope (S) • 3.3 s/S – SNR = H/h Where H = height of the peak corresponding to the component h = absolute value of the largest noise fluctuation from the baseline of the chromatogram of a blank solution 10
  • 11. Limit of Quantitation (LOQ, QL) – The LOQ is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can be quantitatively determined with suitable precision and accuracy – The quantitation limit is used particularly for the determination of impurities and/or degradation products • Determination is usually based on – Signal to noise ratio (~10:1) (baseline noise) or – Standard deviation of response (s) and Slope (S) • 10 s/S - The Quantitation limit of a method is affected by both the detector sensitivity and the accuracy of sample preparation. 11
  • 12. Noise LOD Signal to Noise = 3:1 LOQ Signal to Noise = 10:1 LOD, LOQ and Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR)
  • 13. Range: ICH Definition: The range of an analytical procedure is the interval between the upper and lower concentrations of analytes in the for which it has been demonstrated that the analytical procedure has a suitable level of precision, accuracy, and linearity. Range For Different Tests: • Assay 80 to 120% of test concentration • Content uniformity 70 to 130% of test concentration • Dissolution Q-20% to 120% • Impurities Reporting level – 120% of specification limit (with respect to test concentration of API) • Assay & Impurities Reporting level to 120% of assay specification 13
  • 14. Linearity: Definition : Linearity of an analytical procedure is its ability (within a given range) to obtain test results which are directly proportional to the concentration of analytes in the sample. •If there is a linear relationship test results should be evaluated by appropriate statistical methods like, •Correlation coefficient •Y-intercept •Slope of regression line •Plot of the Data •Method To Determine Linearity •Direct Weigh Method •Dilution Method 14
  • 15. Linearity Ranges and Acceptance Criteria for Various Pharmaceutical Methods 15
  • 16. SYSTEM SUITABILITY TESTING (SST) • System suitability testing (SST) is used to verify resolution, column efficiency, and repeatability of the analysis system to ensure its adequacy for performing the intended application on a daily basis. Which Parameters?? •Number of theoretical plates (efficiency) •Capacity factor, •Separation (relative retention) •Resolution, •Tailing factor •Relative Standard Deviation (Precision) 16
  • 17. •Plate number or number of theoretical plates (n) n=L/H, where L is Length of Column H is HETP or height of one theoretical plate •Capacity factor (capacity ratio) k k’= tr-tm/tm where tr is retention time tm is dead time •Separation Factor (relative retention) α=k1/k2 where k1 is capacity factor of compound a and k2 is capacity factor of compound b •Tailing factor ,T T=W/2f where W is width at 5% at peak height f, distance between max and leading edge of the peak 17
  • 18. 18
  • 19. Robustness : Definition : Robustness is reliability of an analytical procedure with respect to deliberate variations in method parameters. •If measurements are susceptible to variations in analytical conditions the analytical conditions should be suitably controlled or a precautionary statement should be included in the procedure. •PARAMETERS TO BE EVALUATED FOR ROBUSTNESS •Column consistency •Three columns packed by bonded phases from three different silica lots •Mobile Phase • pH (±0.1–0.2 units) • Buffer concentration (±5–10mM) • Percentage organic modifier (±1–2% MP) •Sample •Injection volume or sample concentration • Solvent strength for the final solution •Column temperature (±5°C) •Detector wavelength (±3nm) 19
  • 20. Selectivity and Specificity : •Selectivity is the ability to measure accurately and specifically the analyte in the presence of components that may be expected to be present in the sample matrix. •Specificity for an assay ensures that the signal measured comes from the substance of interest, and that there is no interference from excipient s and/or degradation products and/or impurities. 20
  • 21. Calibration: Definition (ICH): The demonstration that a particular instrument or device produces results within specified limits by comparison with those produced by a reference or traceable standard over an appropriate range of measurements. Various Calibration parameters for HPLC are: •Flow rate accuracy (Pump Module) • Injector accuracy •Carryover •System Precision •Wavelength accuracy •Detector linearity • Injector linearity • Gradient Performance Check • Column oven temperature accuracy 21
  • 22. Flow Rate Accuracy: 1. Prime all the solvent lines with water. 2. Set the flow rate to 0.500 ml/m. 3.Wait for about 15 m to stabilize the system and ensure that the pressure is stable. 4.Insert the outlet tubing into a 10 ml volumetric flask and start the stop watch simultaneously. 5. Stop the stopwatch when the lower meniscus reaches the 10 ml mark on the flask. 6. Record the elapsed time. 7. Similarly check the flow for 1.0 ml/m and 2.0 ml/m. Acceptance criteria: The time taken to collect the water should be with in ± 2.0% of the actual value. 22
  • 23. Pressure Test : •The performance of the HPLC pump depends on the proper functioning of the check valves and the proper connection of the tubing. •For pump systems that output the pressure reading in the pump head over time, a simple pressure test can be a useful qualitative test to check the condition of the check valves and to determine whether or not there are any leaks in the system. •The first step of the pressure test is to plug the outlet of the pump using a dead-nut and by setting the automatic pump shutdown pressure to 6,000 psi. •The pump-head pressure signal output is connected to a recorder. Pressurize the pump by pumping methanol at 1 mL/min. The pressure inside the pump head increases quickly as the outlet of the pump is blocked. As the pressure increases to about 3,000 psi, the flow rate is reduced to 0.1 mL/min. •The pressure will gradually rise to the shutdown pressure if the check valves are able to hold the mobile phase in the pump chamber as would be normally expected . If the check valve is not functioning properly, the pressure will fluctuate at about 3,000 psi instead of reaching the shutdown pressure. 23
  • 24. 24
  • 25. Injector Accuracy: 1. Connect the pump and detector inlet with union. 2. Prepare mobile phase consisting of a mixture of water and Methanol (70:30) 3. Set a flow rate of 0.5 ml/m and a run time of 1 m. 4. Set the column temperature at 25± 2°C. 5.Fill a standard HPLC vial to 2/3rd with water. Seal the vial properly with a cap. 6. Weigh the vial and record the weight as W1 grams. 7. Place the vial in the chromatographic system and perform 6 injections of 50μl volume from this vial. 8. Weigh the vial again and note the weigh after the injections as W2 grams. 9. Calculate the mean volume injected per injection as follows: •Mean injected volume (μl) = (W1 – W2) × 100/6 •Acceptance criteria: The mean injected volume should be 50.0±1.0 μl. 25 Reference: •JBSR (Journal) •Analytical Method Validation and Instrument Performance Verification -Herman Lam and Y.C. Lec
  • 26. Carryover : •Small amounts of analyte may get carried over from the previous injection and contaminate the next sample to be injected. •The carryover will affect the accurate quantitation of the subsequent sample. •The problem is more serious when a dilute sample is injected after a concentrated sample. •In order to avoid cross contamination from the previous sample injection, all the parts in the injector that come into contact with the sample (the injection loop, the injection needle and the needle seat) have to be cleaned effectively after the injection. •The effectiveness of the cleaning can be evaluated by injecting a blank after a sample that contains a high concentration of analyte. •The response of the analyte found in the blank sample expressed as a percentage of the response of the concentrated sample can be used to determine the level of carryover. 26
  • 27. Detector Module: (A)UV-Visible Detector Module: •Wavelength Accuracy 1. Wavelength accuracy is defined as the deviation of the wavelength reading at an absorption or emission band from the known wavelength of the band. 2. The deuterium line at 656 nm and the absorption bands at 418, 453 and 536 nm in a Holmium oxide filter are often used. (B) PDA Detector Accuracy: •Select 3D mode and set the wavelength range as 200-400nm. •Inject 20 μl Holonium oxide of standard preparation once into the chromatographic system. •Extract and record the chromatograms at wavelengths of 202 to 208nm with an interval of 1nm and at 269 to 275 nm with an interval of 1nm. •Note down the height or absorbance. Acceptance criteria: The maximum absorbance should be at 205±2nm and 272±2nm. 27
  • 28. 28 You can Calibrate the PDA Detector for 5 Parameters: 1-Baseline Noise and PDA Drift. 2- Your Lamp Intensity. 3- You have to check for the Wavelength Accuracy. • You can inject Pyrene with Methanol as eluent at a flow of 1 ml/min. • The characteristically maximum of pyrene is determined at 333 nm and compared to a theoretical value. 4- Lastly- You must check your PDA's Linearity you can inject 5 caffeine solutions at different concentrations. Concentrations and peak heights can be represented in a graph. The regression coefficient of the resulting line and the deviations from it indicate indicates the linearity- Usually you R square value should be above 99.90% .
  • 29. Automated Detector Calibration From column To waste Filter with a known Absorbance(s) Flow cell 29
  • 30. From column To waste Filter with a known Absorbance(s) Flow cell 30
  • 31. 31
  • 32. Noise and Drift : •Drift: upward &/or downward movement of base line. •Noise : any unwanted signal recorded by the detector. •Electronic, pump and photometric noise, poor lamp intensity, dirty flow cell, and thermal instability contribute to the overall noise and drift in the detector. •Excessive noise can reduce the sensitivity of the detector and hence affect the quantitation of low-level analytes. •Detector drift may affect the baseline determination and peak integration. •Overcomes for avoiding Noise and Drift: •The detector should be warmed up prior to the test, and any temperature fluctuations should be avoided during the test. •For a dynamic testing condition, methanol is passed through the flow cell at 1 mL/min. •A backpressure of about 500 psi is maintained to prevent bubble formation. 32
  • 33. Column Heating Module : •The efficiency of a HPLC column varies with column temperature. •capacity factor k’ decreases with temperature, and hence the retention of the analysis decreases with temperature . •Retention drops by 1 to 3% for each increase of 1◦C. How To Check?? •The temperature accuracy of the column heater is evaluated by placing a calibrated thermometer in the column compartment to measure the actual compartment temperature. •The thermometer readings are compared to the preset temperature at 40 ◦C and 60◦C. 33
  • 34. 34
  • 35. 35 References: 1. Morden HPLC by Michel Dong, Chapter 9. 2. Analytical Method Validation and Instrument Performance Verification by Herman Lam and Y.C. Lec, Chapter 3 and Chapter 11. 3. Net surf. •Scientist solution.com •Chemicalforum.com •Chemistpub.org 4. Pharmaceutical Journals, •IJPSR •JBSR