Variation in Corn Yield
across Planter Width
Soil Compaction and Corn Yields
• Excessive soil compaction can reduce corn yield by restricting root
  growth and limiting water and air infiltration into the root zone.
• A common source of soil compaction is wheel traffic from large
  machinery at harvest, particularly when soils are wet.
• However, wheel traffic compaction is also created between crop
  rows during planting.
   – Research has shown that compaction created in the interrows at
     planting can decrease yield.
   – Larger and heavier equipment increases the potential for compaction
     at planting.
• Compaction is more variable across the field with wider planters
   – Center fill planters may exacerbate this effect by further concentrating
     wheel traffic weight in the center of the planter pass
DuPont Pioneer Research Study
• In 2011, DuPont Pioneer conducted
  12 on-farm trials in Minnesota looking
  at variability in corn yield associated
  with wheel traffic compaction across
  the width of planter passes.

•   The objectives of this study were to:

    – Evaluate corn yields across the width of large modern
      planters, comparing the center segment, where wheel
      traffic is concentrated, to the outer wing segments

    – Determine implications for best practices when setting up
      split-planter trials
Study Description
• Twelve field-length strip experiments were conducted on
  farms in southern Minnesota in 2011.
• The number of replicates varied by location, from 3 to 18.
• A single hybrid was used across the entire trial within each
  location.
• Trial locations and plot
  layout of planter width
  yield trials conducted
  in southern Minnesota
  in 2011.
  Number of replications
  varied by location.
Study Description
• All trials were harvested using a corn head that was one-third
  the width of the planter.
• The two outside one-third planter passes (or the wing
  segments) were harvested and their mean yield compared to
  the inside one-third planter pass (or the center segment).
• The center segments may have had additional wheel traffic
  (e.g., sprayer pass) that was not characterized as part of this
  study.
• Three different planter configurations were included in
  this study:
   – 36 rows, 22-inch spacing, center fill (3 locations)
   – 48 rows, 20-inch spacing, row-unit boxes (4 locations)
   – 36 rows, 20-inch spacing, center fill (5 locations)
Results
Results from this study showed that corn yield varied across planter width.
    – The average corn yields on the outside wing harvest passes were
      significantly greater than those of the center harvest passes at nine
      of the 12 trial locations.
    – The difference in yield between the wing and center passes varied by
      location, and the average across all locations was 11.3 bu/acre
      (See graph on next slide).
    – The variation in yield effects across locations was not unexpected
        • because wheel compaction varies with soil moisture, the yield
          impact of wheel traffic at planting should vary among environments
          based on soil conditions.
All study locations were planted in narrow rows (20 and 22 inches), which
puts corn in closer proximity to a compacted wheel track in the interrow.
    – Overall yield effects of wheel compaction at planting could be greater in
      narrow rows than in 30-inch rows.
Results
Corn yield difference between wing harvest passes and center harvest
passes in 12 on-farm field-length strip trials conducted in southern Minnesota
in 2011. Asterisks denote locations where yield was significantly different
between wing and center harvest passes.
Conclusion
• Results from this study confirm findings of previous research
  showing that soil compaction created in the interrows at planting can
  reduce corn yield in the adjacent rows, creating variability in yield
  across the width of the planter.
• Aside from avoiding planting when soils are too wet, there is often
  little growers can do to reduce interrow compaction at planting.
• However, it is important to be aware of the potential yield effects
  when conducting a split-planter comparison:
    – If the planter is divided into three or more strips, which may be
      convenient with the size of modern planters, the results from these trials
      may be unfairly biased due to the differential impact of wheel traffic
      among the strips.
    – Consequently, growers should avoid splitting planter passes into more
      than two strips to ensure the most accurate possible yield comparison.
References

Carter, Paul. 1996. Wheel Traffic Between Corn Rows Crop Insights,
  Vol. 6, No. 22. Pioneer Hi-Bred, Johnston, IA.
Kaspar, T.C., S.D. Logsdon, and M.A. Prieksat. 1995. Traffic pattern
  and tillage system effects on corn root and shoot growth. Agron. J.
  87:1046-1051.

More Related Content

PDF
Corn Seeding Rate Considerations for 2014
PDF
Corn Update
PDF
Wisconsin Walking Your Fields newsletter-August
PDF
South central MN Yields from Your Fields -Nov13
PDF
Northeast MN & northern WI Yields from Your Fields-Nov
PDF
Western MN and eastern SD Walking Your Fields newsletter-August
PDF
Stem Height and Yield Response of Four Potato Varieties to Planting Density a...
PDF
Field Facts: Corn Replant Guide Southern US
Corn Seeding Rate Considerations for 2014
Corn Update
Wisconsin Walking Your Fields newsletter-August
South central MN Yields from Your Fields -Nov13
Northeast MN & northern WI Yields from Your Fields-Nov
Western MN and eastern SD Walking Your Fields newsletter-August
Stem Height and Yield Response of Four Potato Varieties to Planting Density a...
Field Facts: Corn Replant Guide Southern US

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Breeding for Organic Production Systems: On Farm Variety Trials
PDF
Maize Hybrids Yield as Affected by Inter and Intra Row Spacing
PDF
Selection Criteria for Yield Improvement in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)
PDF
Combining ability for maize grain yield in striga endemic and non-endemic env...
PDF
A review of research with the “foundations for farming system” of conservatio...
PDF
Rubber Tree Cultivation and Improvement: Rootstock-Scion Compatibility betwee...
PDF
New Earliness Index and Integration of Earliness Additive Genes in the N...
PDF
Line x tester analysis across locations and years in Sudanese x exotic lines ...
PDF
Aprendizajes en 15 años y 120 variedades de arándanos cultivados en el Pacífi...
PPT
The Agronomy of Tef
PDF
IRJET- Transgressive Segregation Studies for High Shelling Percentage in Summ...
DOCX
Cotton hybrid seed production
PPTX
Yield contributing character of maize
PDF
Screening of Castor Genotypes for Early Maturity
PPT
DUS CHARACTERIZATION OF TETRAPLOID COTTON
PDF
Production and Evaluation of Highly Yielding Sweet Pepper Hybrids under Gree...
PPT
ICRISAT Nigeria research and development activities in sorghum and groundnut
PDF
Genetic variability and heritability studies in introgressed F6 progenies from
PDF
Correlation and path analysis for genetic divergence of morphological and fib...
PDF
Correlation and Path analysis studies among yield and yield related traits in...
Breeding for Organic Production Systems: On Farm Variety Trials
Maize Hybrids Yield as Affected by Inter and Intra Row Spacing
Selection Criteria for Yield Improvement in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)
Combining ability for maize grain yield in striga endemic and non-endemic env...
A review of research with the “foundations for farming system” of conservatio...
Rubber Tree Cultivation and Improvement: Rootstock-Scion Compatibility betwee...
New Earliness Index and Integration of Earliness Additive Genes in the N...
Line x tester analysis across locations and years in Sudanese x exotic lines ...
Aprendizajes en 15 años y 120 variedades de arándanos cultivados en el Pacífi...
The Agronomy of Tef
IRJET- Transgressive Segregation Studies for High Shelling Percentage in Summ...
Cotton hybrid seed production
Yield contributing character of maize
Screening of Castor Genotypes for Early Maturity
DUS CHARACTERIZATION OF TETRAPLOID COTTON
Production and Evaluation of Highly Yielding Sweet Pepper Hybrids under Gree...
ICRISAT Nigeria research and development activities in sorghum and groundnut
Genetic variability and heritability studies in introgressed F6 progenies from
Correlation and path analysis for genetic divergence of morphological and fib...
Correlation and Path analysis studies among yield and yield related traits in...
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPT
Tema 8 la II República. 1931-1936
PPTX
vida
PPTX
Diapositivas
PDF
Aop t600040058
PDF
Blog Rp 0 (True Story of AriPerwira.Com)
PDF
Hr 010 光電所進程圖
PDF
CRE-031-您真的瞭解創新的精髓嗎
PDF
CEO-006-成功主管的8個Know How
PDF
Islam Ahmadiyyat Persian - اسلام احمدیت فارسی
PDF
CRE-019-創意思考與與創造力開發Ok
PDF
CRE-024-製商整合科技與產業創新
PPTX
Arte renacimiento escultura 2010 2011
PDF
CRE-036-創新價值服務的開發模式
PPT
Burung Pucung
PPT
HR-023-航空系學涯進程圖
PDF
CEO-006-成功主管的8個Know How
PDF
QM-069-生產現場7S實務
PPT
Dinámica dos ecosistemas
PDF
Lais massucato atividade dissertativa
PDF
DS-029-設計方法與創意思考
Tema 8 la II República. 1931-1936
vida
Diapositivas
Aop t600040058
Blog Rp 0 (True Story of AriPerwira.Com)
Hr 010 光電所進程圖
CRE-031-您真的瞭解創新的精髓嗎
CEO-006-成功主管的8個Know How
Islam Ahmadiyyat Persian - اسلام احمدیت فارسی
CRE-019-創意思考與與創造力開發Ok
CRE-024-製商整合科技與產業創新
Arte renacimiento escultura 2010 2011
CRE-036-創新價值服務的開發模式
Burung Pucung
HR-023-航空系學涯進程圖
CEO-006-成功主管的8個Know How
QM-069-生產現場7S實務
Dinámica dos ecosistemas
Lais massucato atividade dissertativa
DS-029-設計方法與創意思考
Ad

Similar to Variation in Corn Yield across Planter Width (20)

PDF
Effects of conservation tillage
PDF
Soil Sampling
PPTX
Lecture 4 Plant density and geometry.pptx
PDF
Effects of different mole spacings on the yield of summer groundnut
PDF
Samghani et al. 2015
PPTX
Land-Preparation (1).pptxmnzxvbnz nz zzn
PDF
Yield response of aman rice to transplanting geometry and seedlings per hill ...
PDF
Yield response of aman rice to transplanting geometry and seedlings per hill ...
PDF
Yield response of aman rice to transplanting geometry and seedlings per hill ...
PDF
Influence of Plant Density and Mulching on Growth and Yield of Lettuce (Lactu...
PPT
NO-TILL AND CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE FALLOW WINTER WHEAT PRODUCTION COMPARISON IN...
PPSX
TLE 7_8 ACP LESSON 4-LAYOUT GARDEN PLOTS.ppsx
PPT
development of a two-row groundnut seed planter
PPTX
Advance in Agronomyglxogxgtiigigiiggkg .pptx
PPTX
Fortune Sibandze Evaluating the effects of leaf removal on maize growth and y...
PPTX
soil preparation before cultivation and classification of soil
PDF
Effect of planting depth on growth performance of maize (zea mays) at the exp...
PDF
ROOT DISTRIBUTION VARIATION OF CROPS UNDER WALNUT-BASED INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS...
PPTX
Pipeline_Cropping Systems_Link
PPTX
4 citrus site_selection_preparation_establisment
Effects of conservation tillage
Soil Sampling
Lecture 4 Plant density and geometry.pptx
Effects of different mole spacings on the yield of summer groundnut
Samghani et al. 2015
Land-Preparation (1).pptxmnzxvbnz nz zzn
Yield response of aman rice to transplanting geometry and seedlings per hill ...
Yield response of aman rice to transplanting geometry and seedlings per hill ...
Yield response of aman rice to transplanting geometry and seedlings per hill ...
Influence of Plant Density and Mulching on Growth and Yield of Lettuce (Lactu...
NO-TILL AND CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE FALLOW WINTER WHEAT PRODUCTION COMPARISON IN...
TLE 7_8 ACP LESSON 4-LAYOUT GARDEN PLOTS.ppsx
development of a two-row groundnut seed planter
Advance in Agronomyglxogxgtiigigiiggkg .pptx
Fortune Sibandze Evaluating the effects of leaf removal on maize growth and y...
soil preparation before cultivation and classification of soil
Effect of planting depth on growth performance of maize (zea mays) at the exp...
ROOT DISTRIBUTION VARIATION OF CROPS UNDER WALNUT-BASED INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS...
Pipeline_Cropping Systems_Link
4 citrus site_selection_preparation_establisment

More from DuPont Pioneer (20)

PDF
Convenience
PDF
Profitability
PDF
Risk Management
PDF
Sustainability
PDF
Southern WI Yields from Your Fields - Oct 2013
TXT
ACCOUNT_TEST
PPTX
DRC Manuscript.pptx
PDF
FrozenImmatureCorn_Aug2013.pdf
PDF
Northern Minnesota and northern Wisconsin Walking Your Fields newsletter-Aug
PDF
Eastern MN Walking Your Fields newsletter-Aug
PDF
ND & Northern MN Walking Your Fields newsletter-Aug
PDF
South Dakota Walking Your Fields newsletter-Aug
PDF
Western MN and eastern SD Walking Your Fields newsletter-July
PDF
Central Minnesota’s Walking Your Fields newsletter-July
PDF
Wisconsin Walking Your Fields newsletter-July
PDF
ND & Northern MN Walking Your Fields newsletter-July
PDF
South Dakota Walking Your Fields newsletter-July
PDF
Western MN and eastern SD Walking Your Fields newsletter for June
PDF
Wisconsin Walking Your Fields newsletter-June
PDF
Eastern MN & Western WI Walking Your Fields newsletter-June
Convenience
Profitability
Risk Management
Sustainability
Southern WI Yields from Your Fields - Oct 2013
ACCOUNT_TEST
DRC Manuscript.pptx
FrozenImmatureCorn_Aug2013.pdf
Northern Minnesota and northern Wisconsin Walking Your Fields newsletter-Aug
Eastern MN Walking Your Fields newsletter-Aug
ND & Northern MN Walking Your Fields newsletter-Aug
South Dakota Walking Your Fields newsletter-Aug
Western MN and eastern SD Walking Your Fields newsletter-July
Central Minnesota’s Walking Your Fields newsletter-July
Wisconsin Walking Your Fields newsletter-July
ND & Northern MN Walking Your Fields newsletter-July
South Dakota Walking Your Fields newsletter-July
Western MN and eastern SD Walking Your Fields newsletter for June
Wisconsin Walking Your Fields newsletter-June
Eastern MN & Western WI Walking Your Fields newsletter-June

Variation in Corn Yield across Planter Width

  • 1. Variation in Corn Yield across Planter Width
  • 2. Soil Compaction and Corn Yields • Excessive soil compaction can reduce corn yield by restricting root growth and limiting water and air infiltration into the root zone. • A common source of soil compaction is wheel traffic from large machinery at harvest, particularly when soils are wet. • However, wheel traffic compaction is also created between crop rows during planting. – Research has shown that compaction created in the interrows at planting can decrease yield. – Larger and heavier equipment increases the potential for compaction at planting. • Compaction is more variable across the field with wider planters – Center fill planters may exacerbate this effect by further concentrating wheel traffic weight in the center of the planter pass
  • 3. DuPont Pioneer Research Study • In 2011, DuPont Pioneer conducted 12 on-farm trials in Minnesota looking at variability in corn yield associated with wheel traffic compaction across the width of planter passes. • The objectives of this study were to: – Evaluate corn yields across the width of large modern planters, comparing the center segment, where wheel traffic is concentrated, to the outer wing segments – Determine implications for best practices when setting up split-planter trials
  • 4. Study Description • Twelve field-length strip experiments were conducted on farms in southern Minnesota in 2011. • The number of replicates varied by location, from 3 to 18. • A single hybrid was used across the entire trial within each location. • Trial locations and plot layout of planter width yield trials conducted in southern Minnesota in 2011. Number of replications varied by location.
  • 5. Study Description • All trials were harvested using a corn head that was one-third the width of the planter. • The two outside one-third planter passes (or the wing segments) were harvested and their mean yield compared to the inside one-third planter pass (or the center segment). • The center segments may have had additional wheel traffic (e.g., sprayer pass) that was not characterized as part of this study. • Three different planter configurations were included in this study: – 36 rows, 22-inch spacing, center fill (3 locations) – 48 rows, 20-inch spacing, row-unit boxes (4 locations) – 36 rows, 20-inch spacing, center fill (5 locations)
  • 6. Results Results from this study showed that corn yield varied across planter width. – The average corn yields on the outside wing harvest passes were significantly greater than those of the center harvest passes at nine of the 12 trial locations. – The difference in yield between the wing and center passes varied by location, and the average across all locations was 11.3 bu/acre (See graph on next slide). – The variation in yield effects across locations was not unexpected • because wheel compaction varies with soil moisture, the yield impact of wheel traffic at planting should vary among environments based on soil conditions. All study locations were planted in narrow rows (20 and 22 inches), which puts corn in closer proximity to a compacted wheel track in the interrow. – Overall yield effects of wheel compaction at planting could be greater in narrow rows than in 30-inch rows.
  • 7. Results Corn yield difference between wing harvest passes and center harvest passes in 12 on-farm field-length strip trials conducted in southern Minnesota in 2011. Asterisks denote locations where yield was significantly different between wing and center harvest passes.
  • 8. Conclusion • Results from this study confirm findings of previous research showing that soil compaction created in the interrows at planting can reduce corn yield in the adjacent rows, creating variability in yield across the width of the planter. • Aside from avoiding planting when soils are too wet, there is often little growers can do to reduce interrow compaction at planting. • However, it is important to be aware of the potential yield effects when conducting a split-planter comparison: – If the planter is divided into three or more strips, which may be convenient with the size of modern planters, the results from these trials may be unfairly biased due to the differential impact of wheel traffic among the strips. – Consequently, growers should avoid splitting planter passes into more than two strips to ensure the most accurate possible yield comparison.
  • 9. References Carter, Paul. 1996. Wheel Traffic Between Corn Rows Crop Insights, Vol. 6, No. 22. Pioneer Hi-Bred, Johnston, IA. Kaspar, T.C., S.D. Logsdon, and M.A. Prieksat. 1995. Traffic pattern and tillage system effects on corn root and shoot growth. Agron. J. 87:1046-1051.