Want seals with that?
0 likes26 views
1. The author conducted an informal experiment on food orders from a popular fast food chain, finding that the pressure-sensitive adhesive seals used on paper bags were easy to remove and reapply without detection within the first 24-48 hours. 2. Additionally, the bottom of the bags without seals could be pried open and resealed without visible evidence of tampering. 3. While not a rigorous assessment, the seals seem unlikely to reliably detect tampering. Possible purposes for the seals include reassurance during the pandemic or detecting tampering within the restaurant rather than security purposes.
![Journal of Physical Security 14(1), 35-36 (2021)
Want Seals With That?
Fast Food, Covid, and Tamper Detection*
Roger G. Johnston, Ph.D., CPP
Right Brain Sekurity
https://rbsekurity.com
Apparently due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many fast food restaurants now hand you
your order in a paper bag sealed with a pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) label seal. The
way they are typically used for various security purposes, PSA seals do not provide reliable
tamper detection, though this does not necessarily have to be the case if they are used in a
more time-intensive manner with an understanding of their vulnerabilities and attack
scenarios.[1-3]
PSA seals are often easy to lift and reuse without leaving any discernible evidence,
particularly in the Virst 24-48 hours before the adhesive has achieved full adhesion. Putting
a sticky seal on a Vlexible, greasy fast-food paper bag is especially dubious, though the
particular fast-food chain used for this study is not very greasy, nor were the bags
containing my food orders.
I did a series of informal experiments with 5 drive-up window food orders from two local
franchises of the same popular national fast-food chain. Three minutes after the purchase
while in my car, I found that it was easy to remove the bag's PSA seal in 10 to 15 seconds
(presumably less with practice or tools), open the bag, then satisfactorily reseal the bag
with no discernible evidence that the bag had been opened. No special skills, tools, or
solvents were needed, just a bit of careful effort.
It was also quick and easy to pry apart the bottom of the bag (where there was no seal
just an adhesive). I was then able to use a household adhesive to re-glue the bottom of the
bag. Again, no special skills, solvents, or tools were required, and there was no obvious
visual evidence of the attack. Unlike the PSA seal at the top of the bag, the adhesive used on
the bottom of the bag had presumably been present for weeks to months, allowing ample
time for the adhesive to fully set.
This informal experiment is not a substitute for a rigorous vulnerability assessment.
Nevertheless, in terms of tamper-detection, the seal seems likely to be Security Theater.
There may, however, be other appropriate uses for the seal that aren't directly related to
tamper detection.
_______
*This paper was not peer reviewed.
35](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/wantsealswiththat-210312233818/85/Want-seals-with-that-1-320.jpg)
Want seals with that?
- 2. Journal of Physical Security 14(1), 35-36 (2021) The following are some possible purposes for the seal that I could think of, including non- security purposes: 1. Reassure the customer during the pandemic. 2. Detect tampering with the order inside the restaurant. 3. Detect tampering with the order by any delivery driver. 4. Use as a "Vlag" (non-security) seal to indicate to restaurant workers that the order is complete so as to avoid unnecessary additional handling. 5. Authenticate the order as a legitimate order, i.e., the seal would be more like a tag. 6. Remind restaurant employees to follow good anti-COVID procedures. 7. Some other kind of safety or health function? 8. Literally, a seal to be sure the bag is well closed. 9. For advertising purposes, given that the seal contains the company logo; or perhaps for otherwise making a connection with the customer. 10. Provide a Vlap to hold the drinking straw. 11. Other? I emailed a senior public relations ofVicial with the company, and sent a letter to the CEO, inquiring about which purpose(s) in the above list were their intent. Perhaps unsurprisingly, I receive no answer. Possible partial countermeasures for the vulnerabilities with the PSA seal might include brieVly applying heat to the seal to improve adhesion, using a more aggressive adhesive, using a frangible seal, or choosing a different bag material. Stapling the top of the bag through the seal using a digestible staple/rivet might also provide better tamper detection. Possible partial countermeasures for the bottom of the bag might include using a more aggressive adhesive, or using a bag made of heat- or ultrasonically-sealed Mylar or other material that would not require an adhesive to seal the seams. This might be harder to cosmetically repair after an attack. Another approach that could potentially improve tamper detection is to print a highly visible notice on the bag (not the seal!) to encourage customers and employees to visually check the bag and the seal's presence/appearance to look for evidence of tampering. This, of course, would involve explicitly admitting that the seal has a security purpose. References 1. RG Johnston, “Poor Practice Using Pressure-Sensitive Adhesive Seals”, Journal of Physical Security 12(2), 18-28 (2019), https://jps.rbsekurity.com 2. RG Johnston and JS Warner, “How to Choose and Use Seals”, Army Sustainment 44(4), 54-58 (2012), http://www.almc.army.mil/alog/issues/JulAug12/browse.html 3. RG Johnston, “Tamper-Indicating Seals”, American Scientist 94(6), 515-523 (2005) 36