SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
From human mobility to social segregation:
what insights can geospatial data provide?
Meiliu Wu
Ph.D. Student & Research Assistant
Spatial Computing and Data Mining Lab
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Outline
• Background
• Geospatial Data: Then & Now
• Case studies
#1: Mining mobility patterns of different population groups
#2: Examining individually experienced segregation
#3: Measuring access inequity in a hybrid physical-virtual world
• Discussion
• The Good, The Bad, and The Future
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Human Mobility
• Spatiotemporal patterns of
human movements
• An important research subfield
in GIScience
• Significant for a broad range
of applications
• e.g., urban planning, accessibility,
public health, social segregation
and unequal outcomes
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
• “the geography of exclusion”
(Lichter, Parisi and Taquino,
2012)
Social Segregation
Redlining Ghetto Formation Segregated Schools
Spatial distribution Spatial interaction Access to resources
• “a consequence of a social
process characterized by
strong group preferences”
(Morrill, 1991, 26)
• “separate use of facilities
forced upon subordinate
categories and groups of person”
(Bain, 1964, 628)
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Human Mobility → Social Segregation
#1: Distribution #2: Interaction
Physical distribution
across activity space
Virtual distribution
across online space
Physical interaction
across activity space
Virtual interaction
across online space
#3: Unequal access to resources
Spatial inequality
across activity space
Virtual inequality
across online space
Wu M., Wong D., Huang Q., 2023. Segregation: what is in a name? A review of segregation measurement and a prospective framework. Annals of AAG. (Under review)
A framework of social segregation measurement
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Geospatial Data: Then & Now
1980s 2010s 2018 2020s
Type
Placed-based
aggregated
People-based
individual-level
People-based individual-level Placed-based point-level
Data Census statistics
Travel diary records /
Survey
Social media
data
Mobile device
data
POI data
Pros
sociodemographic
data available
publicly,
consistently and
reliably over time
- easy to process;
- activity space;
- no MAUP
- easier to collect;
- rich spatiotemporal info;
- activity space + virtual space;
- no MAUP
- rich spatiotemporal info;
- activity space;
- no MAUP;
- actual “co-present”
Cons
- MAUP;
- residential-only
- expensive to collect;
- reliability &
representativeness;
- reliability & representativeness;
- unlikely suitable for traditional
measures, technically and
conceptually;
- completeness;
- no virtual space records
Challenges & opportunities
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Study #1: Mining mobility patterns of
different racial-ethnic and economic groups
in U.S. top 50 populated cities:
What can social media tell us about segregation?
Wu, M. & Huang, Q., 2022. Human movement patterns of different racial-ethnic and economic groups in U.S. top 50 populated cities:
What can social media tell us about isolation? Annals of GIS, pp.1-23. DOI: 10.1080/19475683.2022.2026471.
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Methodology: Workflow of processing Twitter data to
infer individual’s mobility patterns and user profiles
Geo-tagged
tweets
Race-ethnicity inference
Spatial
clustering
Activity
zones
Predicted
home locations
Travel
distances
Predicted
economic status
Predicted race-
ethnicity
Economic status
of activity space
Usernames
Locations
Land use & daily
inter-zone
Economics statistics
Individual Mobility Patterns
Individual demographics
& socioeconomics
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Methodology: Data collection and pre-processing
Data source:
Geo-tagged tweets
Time:
Dec 2013 – May 2015
Study areas:
U.S. top 50 populated cities
Tools:
Twitter’s streaming application
program interface (API)
Global: 344 m
U.S.
Continent:
>110 m
Top 50 populated cities: >37 m
from twitters with valid names
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Methodology: Individual race-ethnicity inference
White,
70.9%
Black,
23.1%
Asian, 0.5%
Native, 0.9%
Multi, 2.2%
Hispanic, 2.4%
Smith
Surname-based Census Model
Six Racial-Ethnic groups
•Non-Hispanic:
•White
•Black/African American
•Asian/Pacific Islanders
•American Indian and Alaska Native
•Multi-racial
•Hispanic American
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Methodology: Collective trajectory mining
Six Racial-Ethnic groups
•Non-Hispanic:
•White
•Black/African American
•Asian/Pacific Islanders
•American Indian and Alaska Native
•Multi-racial
•Hispanic American
Combination of racial-ethnic and economic groups
•18 groups in total: 6 X 3 demographic groups
Three Economic groups
• Rich
• Mixed
• Poor
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
• Average number of activity zones for different groups
• Spatial and demographic differences of travel distances and
outbound-city travels
• Mobility-based economic segregation for different groups
Methodology: Movement pattern analysis
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Results: Race-ethnicity prediction
• The validation utilizes the ground truth dataset from 297 twitters.
• Surname-based Census Model performs well:
• Precisions ranging from 89.4% to 98.3%
• Providing multiple subdivisions of racial-ethnic groups
Census
Model
Non-
Hispanic
White
Non-Hispanic
Black or
African
American
Hispanic
or Latino
origin
Non-Hispanic
Asian and Native
Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander
Non-Hispanic
American
Indian and
Alaska Native
Non-
Hispanic
Two or More
Races
Precision 0.924 0.894 0.960 0.974 0.983 N/A
Recall 0.677 0.881 0.810 0.947 1.000 N/A
F1 score 0.781 0.887 0.879 0.961 0.991 N/A
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Results: Average number of activity zones for groups
w - Non-Hispanic White
b - Non-Hispanic Black/African American
a - Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders
n - Non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native
m - Non-Hispanic Multi-racial
h - Hispanic American
r – rich (in blue)
m – mixed (in orange)
p – poor (in grey)
For example, wr - Non-Hispanic White and Rich
• Poor: 3.42 > Mixed: 3.25 > Rich: 3.23
• Poor groups have 6% more activity zones than rich groups.
• Non-Hispanic Black/African Americans from rich and poor
groups have the most average number of activity zones.
Black/African + Rich
Black/African + Poor
Poor groups with
more activity zones
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Results: Spatial variability of travel distances
Twitter travels from predicted homes to other activity zones among the
U.S. top 50 populated cities (> 500 km travels excluded)
Power-law fit for the PDF of travel distances
in U.S. 10 largest cities
New York
Philadelphia
Los Angeles
𝑹2 > 0.9
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Results: Demographic differences of travel distances
• Poor: 6,240 m < Mixed: 8,034 m < Rich: 8,872 m
• Poor groups have 42 percent shorter in median travel distance than rich groups.
Poor groups with
shorter distances
Asian
Hispanic
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Results: Spatial & demographic differences of outbound-city travels
Rich: 32% > Mixed: 24% > Poor: 22%
Percentage of outbound-city
travels of U.S. 6 largest cities
Percentage of outbound-city travels of
different demographic groups
Poor minorities:
Native, Asian
and Hispanic
Houston
27.5% NY
27.2%
Philadelphi
Phoenix
24.7%
LA
22.8%
Chicago
21.7%
21.0%
22.0%
23.0%
24.0%
25.0%
26.0%
27.0%
28.0%
29.0%
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Results: Mobility-based economic segregation in 50 largest cities
Percentage of economic groups
traveling to rich, mixed, and poor communities
Percentage of economic and racial-ethnic groups
traveling to rich, mixed, and poor communities
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Results: Mobility-based economic segregation in New York City
Percentage of demographic groups traveling to rich, mixed, and poor communities in New York
Rich->rich avg. 45%
Poor->rich avg. 12%
Asian Poor: 38%
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Inner-city travels from home to
activity zones of Asian + Poor
group in New York
Downtown Flushing
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Study #1: Conclusions
Economically disadvantaged groups:
• Visit more places
• Travel distances shorter
Poor racial-ethnic minorities (e.g., Asian,
Native, and Hispanic):
• More restricted in outbound-city travels
Economically-segregated movement pattern
• National scale: rich neighborhoods are mostly
visited by the rich, while poor neighborhoods are
mainly accessed by the poor,
• Local scale: some race-ethnicities can diversify
this segregated pattern.
Spatial variability of movement patterns is
reflected among the U.S. top 50 populated cities.
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Study #2: Revealing Racial-Ethnic Segregation
with Individual Experienced Segregation Indices
Based on Social Media Data:
A Case Study in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
Wu M., Huang Q., 2023. Revealing Racial-Ethnic Segregation with Individual Experienced Segregation Indices Based on Social Media Data: A Case Study
in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems.
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Individual Experienced Segregation
An emerging new direction: the extent to which individuals are
exposed to different population groups in their daily activities
(Athey et al., 2021; Moro et al., 2021):
• Diversity of individuals' social networks
• Frequency of their interactions
• Activity space (beyond residential)
People-based individual-level Data:
Trajectories from mobile devices
or applications
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Existing Limitations & Research Objective
Lack of individual-level socio-demographics Limitations:
• Minorities largely underestimated
• Their interactions largely untapped
Potential of social media data:
• People-based individual-level with
trajectories;
• More user-generated information
(e.g., surnames for race-ethnicity
inference)
Objective:
Individual experienced racial-ethnic
segregation with social media data
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Methodology: Workflow of processing Twitter data to
infer individual’s mobility patterns and user profiles
Geo-tagged
tweets
Race-ethnicity inference
Spatial
clustering
Activity
zones
Predicted
home locations
Travel
distances
Predicted
economic status
Predicted race-
ethnicity
Economic status
of activity space
Usernames
Locations
Land use & daily
inter-zone
Economics statistics
Individual Mobility Patterns
Individual demographics
& socioeconomics
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Sampled valid users of different groups
Race-ethnicity  Economic status Lower-class Middle-class Upper-class Subtotal
White 173 2,549 860 3,582 (46.71%)
Hispanic 227 2,357 180 2,764 (36.04%)
Black 26 472 122 620 (8.08%)
Asian 38 419 84 541 (7.05%)
Multi-racial 8 75 24 107 (1.40%)
Native 5 41 9 55 (0.72%)
Subtotal 477 (6.22%) 5,913 (77.10%) 1,279 (16.68%) 7,669
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Methodology: Individual experienced segregation indices
Individual 𝒊 experienced diversity index (EDI):
Individual 𝒊 experienced exposure index (EEI)
to each race-ethnicity 𝒎:
෰
𝐸(𝑖,𝑚) = ෍
𝑗=1
𝐽𝑖
𝑝𝑖𝑗
σ𝑞=1
𝑄
𝑝𝑞𝑚 ∗
1
𝑒𝑟
σ𝑞=1
𝑄
𝑝𝑞 ∗
1
𝑒𝑟
𝒓
𝑄: total numbers of activity locations;
𝑝𝑞: time proportion of an individual
staying at activity location 𝑞
𝒒
෱
𝐷𝑖 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝 − ෍
𝑚=1
𝑀
෰
𝐸 𝑖 𝑚 ln ෰
𝐸 𝑖 𝑚
𝒋
p1
p2
p3
p4
𝑝𝑖𝑗
𝑖
𝑗
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Results: Spatial patterns of activity locations
A
B
White cluster
Asian enclave
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Exposure of Different Groups (Location Level)
White Hispanic Black
Asian Multi-races Native
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
EEI of Different Groups (Group Level)
White Hispanic Black
Asian Multi-races Native
Experienced isolation:
All groups have the highest
exposure level to itself
(intra-group interaction).
Little difference in EEIs to
minorities of Black, Asian,
Multi-races and Native.
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
EEI & EDI of Different Groups (Group Level)
0.52 0.51 0.48
0.40 0.30 0.31
0.36
Overall avg EDI = 3.09
Asian
White Hispanic Black
Asian Multi-races Native
EEI of Different Groups (Group Level)
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Individual EDIs at home locations
Spatial clustering:
people with similar EDI values
(inter-group interactions) tend to
live closer.
Asian enclave
Downtown LA
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Correlations of Experienced Segregation
Spearman’s correlations among EEIs, EDI, and mobility variables
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Impact of Economic Status to EEIs
EEI to White
EEI to Hispanic
EEI to Black
EEI to Asian
EEI to Multi-races
EEI to Native
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Impact of Economic Status to EDI
• Exposure diversity decreases as individual’s economic status
is higher for most groups;
• Asian has the highest diversity level.
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Conclusions
• A unified framework for social media user profiling and
mobility pattern analysis
• Novel individual experienced segregation indexes with
distance-decay functions
• Reflecting “directed” two-way interactions between any two groups
• Capturing spatial impacts among activity locations
• Disentangling of socio-demographic factors (race-ethnicity
vs economic status) on segregation measurement
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Study #3: Measuring Access Inequality
in A Hybrid Physical-Virtual World with
POI Data and Household Survey:
A Case Study of Racial Disparity of Healthcare Access
During CoVID-19 in the U.S. top 15 populated Metropolises
Wu M., Huang Q., Gao S., 2023. Measuring Access Inequality in A Hybrid Physical-Virtual World: A Case Study of Racial Disparity of Healthcare Access During
CoVID-19. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Geoinformatics in 2023 (Geoinformatics 2023), July 19-21, 2023, London UK.
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
• negative health impacts
• limited opportunities for
personal and economic
growth
• perpetuation of poverty
Social
segregation
& unequal
outcomes
• food, healthcare, and
education
• among different population
groups: race-ethnicity,
gender, age, and
socioeconomic status
Access Inequality
→ Understanding its patterns and
effects is crucial for addressing
these issues and promoting a
more equitable society.
Segregated Schools
“Separate use of facilities
forced upon subordinate
categories and groups of
person” (Bain, 1964)
Disparity of
resource
access
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Access Inequality in a Physical-Virtual World
#1: Distribution #2: Interaction
Physical distribution
across activity space
Virtual distribution
across online space
Physical interaction
across activity space
Virtual interaction
across online space
#3: Unequal access to resources
Spatial inequality
across activity space
Virtual inequality
across online space
Wu M., Wong D., Huang Q., 2023. Segregation: what is in a name? A review of segregation measurement and a prospective framework. Annals of AAG. (Under revision)
A framework of social segregation measurement
Current limitation(s): Tele-activities are replacing or complementing (traditional)
physical visits, but existing studies still fail to consider virtual interactions.
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Methodology: Framework of Measuring Access Inequity in Hybrid Spaces
Teleworking
Telehealth / telemedicine
Online shopping / delivery
Online education
…
On-site working
Visiting healthcare facilities
Shopping at physical stores
In-person education
…
Disparity among
different social groups
Spatial heterogeneity
among different areas
Identity
Location
Accessibility
in virtual
space
Accessibility
in physical
space
Group disparity
of accessibility in
virtual space
Spatial unevenness
of accessibility in
physical space
𝐸𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙
𝑝𝑜𝑖_𝑖
= − σg=1
𝐺
𝑝𝑔
𝑖
ln 𝑝𝑔
𝑖
𝑇𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 =
1
𝐺
σg=1
𝐺 𝑞𝑔
𝑞
ln
𝑞𝑔
𝑞
𝐻𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 = σi=1
𝑁
𝑡𝑖(𝐸𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙−𝐸𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙
𝑝𝑜𝑖_𝑖
)
𝑇𝐸𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙
𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝐼𝑛𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥
=
𝐺 ∗ 𝑇𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 + 𝐻𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙
2
𝐸𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 = − σg=1
𝐺 𝑝𝑔 ln 𝑝𝑔
The Information Theory Index [0,1]
The Theil Index [0,1]
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Data for Hybrid Spaces
Household
Pulse Survey
(HPS) in
Virtual Space
Records of socio-
economic effects of
coronavirus on U.S.
households
Reflecting group
disparity of
access to
teleactivities
15 Metropolitan
Statistical Areas
(MSAs)
Telehealth sample:
used telehealth
service, April-July
2021 (Week 28-33);
POI Spatio-
temporal Visit
Records in
Physical Space
POIs’ Weekly
Patterns of visit
records from
mobile devices
Reflecting
physical access
to facilities
POIs’ racial
proportions
extracted from
census block
group statistics
14k healthcare
POIs from 15
MSAs, April-
July 2021
Source: US Census https://www.census.gov/data/experimental-data-
products/household-pulse-survey.html
Source: https://docs.safegraph.com/docs/weekly-patterns;
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS): https://www.census.gov/naics/
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Data for Hybrid Spaces
Avg
White
Avg
Black
Avg
Asian
Avg
Others
1,014 160 170 58
915 67 242 79
Num.
POIs
Avg
Num.
Visitors
per POI
Avg
White
%
Avg
Black
%
Avg
Asian
%
Avg
Others
%
Avg
𝑬𝒑𝒉𝒚𝒔𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍
𝒑𝒐𝒊_𝒊
Avg
Distance (m)
1,240 23 55% 18% 11% 16% 0.87 14276
1,118 19 50% 10% 15% 25% 0.97 10888
Household Pulse Survey
(HPS) in Virtual Space
POI Spatio-temporal Visit Records
in Physical Space
Two
Largest
MSAs
(Weekly)
New York-
Newark-
Jersey City,
NY-NJ-PA
Los Angeles-
Long Beach-
Anaheim, CA
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Results: Average Weekly Access Inequity Index (Hybrid)
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Virtual: Average Weekly Theil Index
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Physical: Average Weekly Information Theory Index
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Hybrid: Weekly Patterns of Indices
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Virtual: Percent of Telehealth Usage by Race
→ Telehealth usage: Black & Others more likely vs. White & Asian less likely, aligning
with the risk for COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death by race reported by CDC.
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Physical: Racial Components of Visitors for Different POIs
Physicians Mental health Dentists
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Physical: Average Entropy by POI Category
Physicians
Mental health
Dentists
Avg
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Physical: Correlation between POIs’ Entropy and Visit Patterns
Percentages of Others and
Asian positively correlated
with the diversity of the
served population of POIs
Percentage of Black negatively
correlated with the ones of all
other races, especially of White
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Physical: Local Moran’s I of Entropy by POI
To evaluate if Entropy of a POI and average Entropy of its
surroundings is either more similar (HH or LL) or
dissimilar (HL, LH) than a random spatial distribution.
Statistically significant POIs:
• HH: clustered in the downtown and north of Chicago
• LL: clustered in the south of Chicago (the Black-
dominant physical healthcare zone)
→ Residential segregation can force a considerable
impact on the segregated pattern of physical
healthcare access by race.
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Conclusions
• An integrated framework for measuring access inequality in
hybrid spaces;
• A novel Access Inequity Index;
• New insights into the racial disparity of healthcare access;
• New opportunities to measuring social inequality in hybrid
spaces in future.
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Study #1 Mobility
patterns with social
media data
Study #2 Individual
experienced segregation
with social media data
Study #3 Hybrid-space
Access Inequity Measures
with POI data and Survey
The Good, The Bad, and The Future
• Data-driven development
• Residential-only → Activity space
• Place-based aggregated → People-based individual-level
• Semantic knowledge of movement
• The likelihood of “co-presence”
• A hybrid physical-virtual world
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Acknowledgment
• Sponsored by NIFA, DOE, NASA, NIH, and NSF projects, as
well as Trewartha-Odebolt Award, WARF, Vilas Associates
Award from UW-Madison.
• Advisors: Drs. Qunying Huang, Zhou Zhang, David S. Wong
(GMU), Song Gao, Robert Roth.
• Colleagues: Dr. Xinyi Liu, Dr. Peng Bo, Chris Sheele,
Chenxiao (Atlas) Guo, Jamp Vongkusolkit, Yuehan Qin.
Department of Geography, UW-Madison
August 01, 2023
Thank you!
Questions?
"Segregation... not only harms one physically but
injures one spiritually...
It scars the soul... It is a system which forever stares
the segregated in the face, saying 'You are less than...'
'You are not equal to... ' "
-- Martin Luther King Jr.

More Related Content

PPT
Crowdsourcing and Participation in Cartography (G572 Guest Lecture)
PPTX
Determining the Drivers and Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Onli...
PPTX
GIS in Professional Planning Practice
PDF
URISA The Development of a Geospatial Society and Why GIS Matters
PPT
Ch01 introduction to_human_geography
PPTX
Learning the city powerpointfrom am v3
PPTX
Towards a New Empiricism: Polarisation across Four Dimensions
Crowdsourcing and Participation in Cartography (G572 Guest Lecture)
Determining the Drivers and Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Onli...
GIS in Professional Planning Practice
URISA The Development of a Geospatial Society and Why GIS Matters
Ch01 introduction to_human_geography
Learning the city powerpointfrom am v3
Towards a New Empiricism: Polarisation across Four Dimensions

Similar to What insights can geospatial data provide.pdf (20)

PPT
Neighborhood Opportunity Mapping for Regional Equity
PDF
GIS and Agent-based modeling: Part 2
PPT
Data, Indicators and Maps on Homelessness
PDF
A Critical Review of High and Very High-Resolution Remote Sensing Approaches ...
PDF
Utilizing geospatial analysis of U.S. Census data for studying the dynamics o...
PPTX
The Intersection of Race, Gender, Sport and Higher Education in Two Year Coll...
PPTX
Understanding disparities using the American Community Survey - Sean Green, M...
PPTX
PDF
Does Place Really Matter? Broadband Availability, Race and Income
PDF
Materi Sharing Session_1 MODA TRANSPORTASI.pdf
PDF
Gieseking - "Queering the Map" Talk
PDF
URISA The Development of a Geospatial Society, ROI, and Why GIS Matters
PDF
Geography Brochure legal size print (Updated June 2016)
PDF
Routledge Handbook of Media Geographies 1st Edition Paul C Adams
KEY
U spatial digital-humanities
PPTX
Interactive mapping for journalists
PDF
Twitter track study 110628
PPTX
Online Mapping Patterns in 2013 and Beyond
PPT
Community assessment for health statistics lib guide june 2012
PDF
Mapping News Media Polarisation during the Voice to Parliament Referendum
Neighborhood Opportunity Mapping for Regional Equity
GIS and Agent-based modeling: Part 2
Data, Indicators and Maps on Homelessness
A Critical Review of High and Very High-Resolution Remote Sensing Approaches ...
Utilizing geospatial analysis of U.S. Census data for studying the dynamics o...
The Intersection of Race, Gender, Sport and Higher Education in Two Year Coll...
Understanding disparities using the American Community Survey - Sean Green, M...
Does Place Really Matter? Broadband Availability, Race and Income
Materi Sharing Session_1 MODA TRANSPORTASI.pdf
Gieseking - "Queering the Map" Talk
URISA The Development of a Geospatial Society, ROI, and Why GIS Matters
Geography Brochure legal size print (Updated June 2016)
Routledge Handbook of Media Geographies 1st Edition Paul C Adams
U spatial digital-humanities
Interactive mapping for journalists
Twitter track study 110628
Online Mapping Patterns in 2013 and Beyond
Community assessment for health statistics lib guide june 2012
Mapping News Media Polarisation during the Voice to Parliament Referendum
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PPTX
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PPTX
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
Indian roads congress 037 - 2012 Flexible pavement
PDF
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
advance database management system book.pdf
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
Indian roads congress 037 - 2012 Flexible pavement
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
Ad

What insights can geospatial data provide.pdf

  • 1. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 From human mobility to social segregation: what insights can geospatial data provide? Meiliu Wu Ph.D. Student & Research Assistant Spatial Computing and Data Mining Lab Department of Geography, UW-Madison
  • 2. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Outline • Background • Geospatial Data: Then & Now • Case studies #1: Mining mobility patterns of different population groups #2: Examining individually experienced segregation #3: Measuring access inequity in a hybrid physical-virtual world • Discussion • The Good, The Bad, and The Future
  • 3. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Human Mobility • Spatiotemporal patterns of human movements • An important research subfield in GIScience • Significant for a broad range of applications • e.g., urban planning, accessibility, public health, social segregation and unequal outcomes
  • 4. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 • “the geography of exclusion” (Lichter, Parisi and Taquino, 2012) Social Segregation Redlining Ghetto Formation Segregated Schools Spatial distribution Spatial interaction Access to resources • “a consequence of a social process characterized by strong group preferences” (Morrill, 1991, 26) • “separate use of facilities forced upon subordinate categories and groups of person” (Bain, 1964, 628)
  • 5. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Human Mobility → Social Segregation #1: Distribution #2: Interaction Physical distribution across activity space Virtual distribution across online space Physical interaction across activity space Virtual interaction across online space #3: Unequal access to resources Spatial inequality across activity space Virtual inequality across online space Wu M., Wong D., Huang Q., 2023. Segregation: what is in a name? A review of segregation measurement and a prospective framework. Annals of AAG. (Under review) A framework of social segregation measurement
  • 6. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Geospatial Data: Then & Now 1980s 2010s 2018 2020s Type Placed-based aggregated People-based individual-level People-based individual-level Placed-based point-level Data Census statistics Travel diary records / Survey Social media data Mobile device data POI data Pros sociodemographic data available publicly, consistently and reliably over time - easy to process; - activity space; - no MAUP - easier to collect; - rich spatiotemporal info; - activity space + virtual space; - no MAUP - rich spatiotemporal info; - activity space; - no MAUP; - actual “co-present” Cons - MAUP; - residential-only - expensive to collect; - reliability & representativeness; - reliability & representativeness; - unlikely suitable for traditional measures, technically and conceptually; - completeness; - no virtual space records Challenges & opportunities
  • 7. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Study #1: Mining mobility patterns of different racial-ethnic and economic groups in U.S. top 50 populated cities: What can social media tell us about segregation? Wu, M. & Huang, Q., 2022. Human movement patterns of different racial-ethnic and economic groups in U.S. top 50 populated cities: What can social media tell us about isolation? Annals of GIS, pp.1-23. DOI: 10.1080/19475683.2022.2026471.
  • 8. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Methodology: Workflow of processing Twitter data to infer individual’s mobility patterns and user profiles Geo-tagged tweets Race-ethnicity inference Spatial clustering Activity zones Predicted home locations Travel distances Predicted economic status Predicted race- ethnicity Economic status of activity space Usernames Locations Land use & daily inter-zone Economics statistics Individual Mobility Patterns Individual demographics & socioeconomics
  • 9. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Methodology: Data collection and pre-processing Data source: Geo-tagged tweets Time: Dec 2013 – May 2015 Study areas: U.S. top 50 populated cities Tools: Twitter’s streaming application program interface (API) Global: 344 m U.S. Continent: >110 m Top 50 populated cities: >37 m from twitters with valid names
  • 10. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Methodology: Individual race-ethnicity inference White, 70.9% Black, 23.1% Asian, 0.5% Native, 0.9% Multi, 2.2% Hispanic, 2.4% Smith Surname-based Census Model Six Racial-Ethnic groups •Non-Hispanic: •White •Black/African American •Asian/Pacific Islanders •American Indian and Alaska Native •Multi-racial •Hispanic American
  • 11. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Methodology: Collective trajectory mining Six Racial-Ethnic groups •Non-Hispanic: •White •Black/African American •Asian/Pacific Islanders •American Indian and Alaska Native •Multi-racial •Hispanic American Combination of racial-ethnic and economic groups •18 groups in total: 6 X 3 demographic groups Three Economic groups • Rich • Mixed • Poor
  • 12. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 • Average number of activity zones for different groups • Spatial and demographic differences of travel distances and outbound-city travels • Mobility-based economic segregation for different groups Methodology: Movement pattern analysis
  • 13. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Results: Race-ethnicity prediction • The validation utilizes the ground truth dataset from 297 twitters. • Surname-based Census Model performs well: • Precisions ranging from 89.4% to 98.3% • Providing multiple subdivisions of racial-ethnic groups Census Model Non- Hispanic White Non-Hispanic Black or African American Hispanic or Latino origin Non-Hispanic Asian and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native Non- Hispanic Two or More Races Precision 0.924 0.894 0.960 0.974 0.983 N/A Recall 0.677 0.881 0.810 0.947 1.000 N/A F1 score 0.781 0.887 0.879 0.961 0.991 N/A
  • 14. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Results: Average number of activity zones for groups w - Non-Hispanic White b - Non-Hispanic Black/African American a - Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders n - Non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native m - Non-Hispanic Multi-racial h - Hispanic American r – rich (in blue) m – mixed (in orange) p – poor (in grey) For example, wr - Non-Hispanic White and Rich • Poor: 3.42 > Mixed: 3.25 > Rich: 3.23 • Poor groups have 6% more activity zones than rich groups. • Non-Hispanic Black/African Americans from rich and poor groups have the most average number of activity zones. Black/African + Rich Black/African + Poor Poor groups with more activity zones
  • 15. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Results: Spatial variability of travel distances Twitter travels from predicted homes to other activity zones among the U.S. top 50 populated cities (> 500 km travels excluded) Power-law fit for the PDF of travel distances in U.S. 10 largest cities New York Philadelphia Los Angeles 𝑹2 > 0.9
  • 16. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Results: Demographic differences of travel distances • Poor: 6,240 m < Mixed: 8,034 m < Rich: 8,872 m • Poor groups have 42 percent shorter in median travel distance than rich groups. Poor groups with shorter distances Asian Hispanic
  • 17. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Results: Spatial & demographic differences of outbound-city travels Rich: 32% > Mixed: 24% > Poor: 22% Percentage of outbound-city travels of U.S. 6 largest cities Percentage of outbound-city travels of different demographic groups Poor minorities: Native, Asian and Hispanic Houston 27.5% NY 27.2% Philadelphi Phoenix 24.7% LA 22.8% Chicago 21.7% 21.0% 22.0% 23.0% 24.0% 25.0% 26.0% 27.0% 28.0% 29.0%
  • 18. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Results: Mobility-based economic segregation in 50 largest cities Percentage of economic groups traveling to rich, mixed, and poor communities Percentage of economic and racial-ethnic groups traveling to rich, mixed, and poor communities
  • 19. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Results: Mobility-based economic segregation in New York City Percentage of demographic groups traveling to rich, mixed, and poor communities in New York Rich->rich avg. 45% Poor->rich avg. 12% Asian Poor: 38%
  • 20. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Inner-city travels from home to activity zones of Asian + Poor group in New York Downtown Flushing
  • 21. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Study #1: Conclusions Economically disadvantaged groups: • Visit more places • Travel distances shorter Poor racial-ethnic minorities (e.g., Asian, Native, and Hispanic): • More restricted in outbound-city travels Economically-segregated movement pattern • National scale: rich neighborhoods are mostly visited by the rich, while poor neighborhoods are mainly accessed by the poor, • Local scale: some race-ethnicities can diversify this segregated pattern. Spatial variability of movement patterns is reflected among the U.S. top 50 populated cities.
  • 22. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Study #2: Revealing Racial-Ethnic Segregation with Individual Experienced Segregation Indices Based on Social Media Data: A Case Study in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim Wu M., Huang Q., 2023. Revealing Racial-Ethnic Segregation with Individual Experienced Segregation Indices Based on Social Media Data: A Case Study in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems.
  • 23. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Individual Experienced Segregation An emerging new direction: the extent to which individuals are exposed to different population groups in their daily activities (Athey et al., 2021; Moro et al., 2021): • Diversity of individuals' social networks • Frequency of their interactions • Activity space (beyond residential) People-based individual-level Data: Trajectories from mobile devices or applications
  • 24. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Existing Limitations & Research Objective Lack of individual-level socio-demographics Limitations: • Minorities largely underestimated • Their interactions largely untapped Potential of social media data: • People-based individual-level with trajectories; • More user-generated information (e.g., surnames for race-ethnicity inference) Objective: Individual experienced racial-ethnic segregation with social media data
  • 25. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Methodology: Workflow of processing Twitter data to infer individual’s mobility patterns and user profiles Geo-tagged tweets Race-ethnicity inference Spatial clustering Activity zones Predicted home locations Travel distances Predicted economic status Predicted race- ethnicity Economic status of activity space Usernames Locations Land use & daily inter-zone Economics statistics Individual Mobility Patterns Individual demographics & socioeconomics
  • 26. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Sampled valid users of different groups Race-ethnicity Economic status Lower-class Middle-class Upper-class Subtotal White 173 2,549 860 3,582 (46.71%) Hispanic 227 2,357 180 2,764 (36.04%) Black 26 472 122 620 (8.08%) Asian 38 419 84 541 (7.05%) Multi-racial 8 75 24 107 (1.40%) Native 5 41 9 55 (0.72%) Subtotal 477 (6.22%) 5,913 (77.10%) 1,279 (16.68%) 7,669
  • 27. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Methodology: Individual experienced segregation indices Individual 𝒊 experienced diversity index (EDI): Individual 𝒊 experienced exposure index (EEI) to each race-ethnicity 𝒎: ෰ 𝐸(𝑖,𝑚) = ෍ 𝑗=1 𝐽𝑖 𝑝𝑖𝑗 σ𝑞=1 𝑄 𝑝𝑞𝑚 ∗ 1 𝑒𝑟 σ𝑞=1 𝑄 𝑝𝑞 ∗ 1 𝑒𝑟 𝒓 𝑄: total numbers of activity locations; 𝑝𝑞: time proportion of an individual staying at activity location 𝑞 𝒒 ෱ 𝐷𝑖 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝 − ෍ 𝑚=1 𝑀 ෰ 𝐸 𝑖 𝑚 ln ෰ 𝐸 𝑖 𝑚 𝒋 p1 p2 p3 p4 𝑝𝑖𝑗 𝑖 𝑗
  • 28. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Results: Spatial patterns of activity locations A B White cluster Asian enclave
  • 29. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Exposure of Different Groups (Location Level) White Hispanic Black Asian Multi-races Native
  • 30. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 EEI of Different Groups (Group Level) White Hispanic Black Asian Multi-races Native Experienced isolation: All groups have the highest exposure level to itself (intra-group interaction). Little difference in EEIs to minorities of Black, Asian, Multi-races and Native.
  • 31. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 EEI & EDI of Different Groups (Group Level) 0.52 0.51 0.48 0.40 0.30 0.31 0.36 Overall avg EDI = 3.09 Asian White Hispanic Black Asian Multi-races Native EEI of Different Groups (Group Level)
  • 32. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Individual EDIs at home locations Spatial clustering: people with similar EDI values (inter-group interactions) tend to live closer. Asian enclave Downtown LA
  • 33. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Correlations of Experienced Segregation Spearman’s correlations among EEIs, EDI, and mobility variables
  • 34. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Impact of Economic Status to EEIs EEI to White EEI to Hispanic EEI to Black EEI to Asian EEI to Multi-races EEI to Native
  • 35. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Impact of Economic Status to EDI • Exposure diversity decreases as individual’s economic status is higher for most groups; • Asian has the highest diversity level.
  • 36. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Conclusions • A unified framework for social media user profiling and mobility pattern analysis • Novel individual experienced segregation indexes with distance-decay functions • Reflecting “directed” two-way interactions between any two groups • Capturing spatial impacts among activity locations • Disentangling of socio-demographic factors (race-ethnicity vs economic status) on segregation measurement
  • 37. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Study #3: Measuring Access Inequality in A Hybrid Physical-Virtual World with POI Data and Household Survey: A Case Study of Racial Disparity of Healthcare Access During CoVID-19 in the U.S. top 15 populated Metropolises Wu M., Huang Q., Gao S., 2023. Measuring Access Inequality in A Hybrid Physical-Virtual World: A Case Study of Racial Disparity of Healthcare Access During CoVID-19. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Geoinformatics in 2023 (Geoinformatics 2023), July 19-21, 2023, London UK.
  • 38. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 • negative health impacts • limited opportunities for personal and economic growth • perpetuation of poverty Social segregation & unequal outcomes • food, healthcare, and education • among different population groups: race-ethnicity, gender, age, and socioeconomic status Access Inequality → Understanding its patterns and effects is crucial for addressing these issues and promoting a more equitable society. Segregated Schools “Separate use of facilities forced upon subordinate categories and groups of person” (Bain, 1964) Disparity of resource access
  • 39. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Access Inequality in a Physical-Virtual World #1: Distribution #2: Interaction Physical distribution across activity space Virtual distribution across online space Physical interaction across activity space Virtual interaction across online space #3: Unequal access to resources Spatial inequality across activity space Virtual inequality across online space Wu M., Wong D., Huang Q., 2023. Segregation: what is in a name? A review of segregation measurement and a prospective framework. Annals of AAG. (Under revision) A framework of social segregation measurement Current limitation(s): Tele-activities are replacing or complementing (traditional) physical visits, but existing studies still fail to consider virtual interactions.
  • 40. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Methodology: Framework of Measuring Access Inequity in Hybrid Spaces Teleworking Telehealth / telemedicine Online shopping / delivery Online education … On-site working Visiting healthcare facilities Shopping at physical stores In-person education … Disparity among different social groups Spatial heterogeneity among different areas Identity Location Accessibility in virtual space Accessibility in physical space Group disparity of accessibility in virtual space Spatial unevenness of accessibility in physical space 𝐸𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑖_𝑖 = − σg=1 𝐺 𝑝𝑔 𝑖 ln 𝑝𝑔 𝑖 𝑇𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 = 1 𝐺 σg=1 𝐺 𝑞𝑔 𝑞 ln 𝑞𝑔 𝑞 𝐻𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 = σi=1 𝑁 𝑡𝑖(𝐸𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙−𝐸𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑖_𝑖 ) 𝑇𝐸𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝐼𝑛𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥 = 𝐺 ∗ 𝑇𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 + 𝐻𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 2 𝐸𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 = − σg=1 𝐺 𝑝𝑔 ln 𝑝𝑔 The Information Theory Index [0,1] The Theil Index [0,1]
  • 41. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Data for Hybrid Spaces Household Pulse Survey (HPS) in Virtual Space Records of socio- economic effects of coronavirus on U.S. households Reflecting group disparity of access to teleactivities 15 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) Telehealth sample: used telehealth service, April-July 2021 (Week 28-33); POI Spatio- temporal Visit Records in Physical Space POIs’ Weekly Patterns of visit records from mobile devices Reflecting physical access to facilities POIs’ racial proportions extracted from census block group statistics 14k healthcare POIs from 15 MSAs, April- July 2021 Source: US Census https://www.census.gov/data/experimental-data- products/household-pulse-survey.html Source: https://docs.safegraph.com/docs/weekly-patterns; North American Industry Classification System (NAICS): https://www.census.gov/naics/
  • 42. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Data for Hybrid Spaces Avg White Avg Black Avg Asian Avg Others 1,014 160 170 58 915 67 242 79 Num. POIs Avg Num. Visitors per POI Avg White % Avg Black % Avg Asian % Avg Others % Avg 𝑬𝒑𝒉𝒚𝒔𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍 𝒑𝒐𝒊_𝒊 Avg Distance (m) 1,240 23 55% 18% 11% 16% 0.87 14276 1,118 19 50% 10% 15% 25% 0.97 10888 Household Pulse Survey (HPS) in Virtual Space POI Spatio-temporal Visit Records in Physical Space Two Largest MSAs (Weekly) New York- Newark- Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA Los Angeles- Long Beach- Anaheim, CA
  • 43. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Results: Average Weekly Access Inequity Index (Hybrid)
  • 44. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Virtual: Average Weekly Theil Index
  • 45. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Physical: Average Weekly Information Theory Index
  • 46. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Hybrid: Weekly Patterns of Indices
  • 47. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Virtual: Percent of Telehealth Usage by Race → Telehealth usage: Black & Others more likely vs. White & Asian less likely, aligning with the risk for COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death by race reported by CDC.
  • 48. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Physical: Racial Components of Visitors for Different POIs Physicians Mental health Dentists
  • 49. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Physical: Average Entropy by POI Category Physicians Mental health Dentists Avg
  • 50. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Physical: Correlation between POIs’ Entropy and Visit Patterns Percentages of Others and Asian positively correlated with the diversity of the served population of POIs Percentage of Black negatively correlated with the ones of all other races, especially of White
  • 51. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Physical: Local Moran’s I of Entropy by POI To evaluate if Entropy of a POI and average Entropy of its surroundings is either more similar (HH or LL) or dissimilar (HL, LH) than a random spatial distribution. Statistically significant POIs: • HH: clustered in the downtown and north of Chicago • LL: clustered in the south of Chicago (the Black- dominant physical healthcare zone) → Residential segregation can force a considerable impact on the segregated pattern of physical healthcare access by race.
  • 52. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Conclusions • An integrated framework for measuring access inequality in hybrid spaces; • A novel Access Inequity Index; • New insights into the racial disparity of healthcare access; • New opportunities to measuring social inequality in hybrid spaces in future.
  • 53. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Study #1 Mobility patterns with social media data Study #2 Individual experienced segregation with social media data Study #3 Hybrid-space Access Inequity Measures with POI data and Survey The Good, The Bad, and The Future • Data-driven development • Residential-only → Activity space • Place-based aggregated → People-based individual-level • Semantic knowledge of movement • The likelihood of “co-presence” • A hybrid physical-virtual world
  • 54. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Acknowledgment • Sponsored by NIFA, DOE, NASA, NIH, and NSF projects, as well as Trewartha-Odebolt Award, WARF, Vilas Associates Award from UW-Madison. • Advisors: Drs. Qunying Huang, Zhou Zhang, David S. Wong (GMU), Song Gao, Robert Roth. • Colleagues: Dr. Xinyi Liu, Dr. Peng Bo, Chris Sheele, Chenxiao (Atlas) Guo, Jamp Vongkusolkit, Yuehan Qin.
  • 55. Department of Geography, UW-Madison August 01, 2023 Thank you! Questions? "Segregation... not only harms one physically but injures one spiritually... It scars the soul... It is a system which forever stares the segregated in the face, saying 'You are less than...' 'You are not equal to... ' " -- Martin Luther King Jr.