Why spend time on OER - Workshop EDEN konf 2013
0 likes420 views
This document discusses open educational resources (OER) and why time should be spent on them. It provides an overview of Swedish OER initiatives that will be showcased, including best practices and available online resources. OER are described as free course materials available under creative commons licenses for public access. Challenges of engaging with OER include the time required without obvious rewards, issues of quality, legal and technical challenges, and economic factors. However, reasons to engage with OER include sharing knowledge, enhancing education, supporting lifelong learning, capacity building, and acting for the public good. Stages of OER engagement are presented as a ladder. Examples of Swedish OER initiatives and resources are provided. The document ends with discussions
Why spend time on OER - Workshop EDEN konf 2013
- 1. Why spend time on OER ? EDEN Oslo 2013 Ulf Sandstrom, Swedish Association for Distance Education – SADE Mats Brenner, University of Gavle, Sweden
- 2. Why spend time on OER ? • The OER has become a World Wide movement and during this workshop, Swedish OER initiatives will be showcased, with best practice and available resources on the Internet. EDEN Oslo 2013
- 3. Why spend time on OER ? We will discuss , free course materials and how they are described under the creative commons licenses in a digital form of “right of public access” to course materials. EDEN Oslo 2013
- 4. Why spend time on OER ? EDEN Oslo 2013
- 5. Why spend time on OER ? . EDEN Oslo 2013
- 6. Core attributes • Open acess • Open licence • Open format • Open software EDEN Oslo 2013
- 7. Challenges of OER engagement 1 • Time without obvious reward • Quality • Legal • Technical • Economic EDEN Oslo 2013
- 8. Challenges of OER engagement 2 • Social • Policy • Marketing • Belief EDEN Oslo 2013
- 9. Why bother ? (1) • Sharing knowledge • Breaking down barriers to education • Enhancing formal and informal learning • Supporting lifelong learning • Widening participation EDEN Oslo 2013
- 10. Why bother ? (2) • Capacity building • Quality enhancement • Financial • Impact EDEN Oslo 2013
- 11. Why bother ? (3) • Inspiration • Reputation • Marketing • Publishing • Challenging thinking EDEN Oslo 2013
- 12. Why bother ? (4) • Public good • Efficiency • Ethics • Networking and • connectivity EDEN Oslo 2013
- 13. STAGES OF ENGAGEMENT: The OER Engagement Ladder EDEN Oslo 2013 The OER Engagement Ladder. ©2012 Joanna Wild, University of Oxford
- 14. OER and knowledge • Open access • Research communications • Information literacy • Library resources EDEN Oslo 2013
- 15. OER and knowledge EDEN Oslo 2013
- 16. UR Sweden EDEN Oslo 2013 • http://www.ur.se/play • Educational broadcasting company has after a year of negotiating with various rights holders managed to make the 8000 educational materials openly available online.
- 17. OERSverige EDEN Oslo 2013 • http://www.oersverige.se • http://libguides.lub.lu.se/oer
- 18. Flipped Classroom EDEN Oslo 2013 • http://www.danielbarker.se • http://barkersthlm.blogspot.no/
- 19. Autentication and metadata EDEN Oslo 2013 • http://skolfederation.se • http://korturl.com/spindeln • http://www.lankskafferiet.org/ • http://shareanduse.ning.com/ • http://www.opensnh.se
- 20. Regional Initiatives OER EDEN Oslo 2013 • http://www.kursnavet.se • http://www.larresurser.se • http://www.digiref.se
- 21. Why spend time on OER ? (1) Group discussion: 3 pin points for OER How can OER develop further ? 1.Searchability and profiling 2.Renewal 3.Rating system EDEN Oslo 2013
- 22. Why spend time on OER ?( 2) Group discussion: 3 pin points for OER How can OER develop further ? 1.Copyright and ipr 2.Inspection systems 3.Regional local bottom-up EDEN Oslo 2013
- 23. Why spend time on OER ? ( 3) Group discussion: 3 pin points for OER How can OER develop further ? 1. Impact / evidence -> smarter OER /OER footprint 2. Imperfect design-> Wabisabi principle 3. Open formats 4 Multidimensional approach EDEN Oslo 2013
- 24. Thanks for your attention ! ulfsan@gmail.com mats.brenner@hig.se EDEN Oslo 2013