SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Why to know statistics
To understand data
Example One of your colleague is an oncology surgeon 60% of his cases died Does this mean that he is a looser!!
We should ask what are the results of his colleagues in  similar  patients How many patients he operated upon e.g 2/3!!!!
To summarize data
Example Diastolic Blood pressure 80,70,65,90,74,80,60,90,60,75,80,90,100,100,100,95 Age 24,30,26,40,28,21,26,31,32,36,27,45,62,58,52,50,60
Vital for research Without the use of statistics it would be very difficult to make decisions based on the data collected from a research project
Statistical steps in research Collect data Organise data Analyse data Interpret the data Present the data
How to read the results An understanding of basic statistics will provide you with the fundamental skills necessary to read and evaluate results section in published papers
Are groups comparable!!! the baseline characteristics of the groups being studied should be comparable If not, they should be adjusted for differences
statistical tests  Are they frequently used tests!! If not, why!!
Are the data analysed according to the original protocol?
Was  follow- up complete? Patients lost to follow-up ……… loss of subjects bias > 10% - 15 %  ………………… ..invalid results
P value A P value of <0.05 means that this result would have arisen by chance on less than one occasion in 20
Standardization of measures of outcome: Odds and odds ratio The odds is the number of patients who fulfil the criteria for a given endpoint divided by the number of patients who do not.
For example the odds of diarrhoea during treatment with an antibiotic in a group of 10 patients may be 4 to 6 (4 with diarrhoea divided by 6 without, 0.66); in a control group the odds may be 1 to 9 (0.11). The odds ratio of treatment to control group would be 6 (0.66÷0.11).
Risk and relative risk The risk is the number of patients who fulfil the criteria for a given end point divided by the total number of patients.
For example, the risk of diarrhoea during treatment with an antibiotic in a group of 10 patients may be 4 to 10; in the control group the risks may be 1 to 10. The relative risk of treatment to control group would be 4 (0.4÷0.1).
C.I The confidence interval around a result in a clinical trial indicates the limits within which the &quot;real&quot; difference between the treatments is likely to lie,  hence the strength of the inference that can be drawn from the result
Example: 95 %  CI for RRR 25 % : sample size 100 …………… .= -- 38 %  to  59 % Sample size 1000 ………… .=  9 % to 41 %  The larger the sample size , the narrower and more precise  the CI , and the greater our confidence that the true RRR is closer to what we have observed .
OR = 0.34,  95% CI 0.23 - 0.52 Odds Ratio < 1    decreased risk Confidence Interval does not cross 1    statistically significant
A statistically significant result may not be clinically significant.
The results of intervention trials should be expressed in terms of the likely benefit an individual could expect (for example, the absolute risk reduction)
How large was the treatment effect ? Treatment effect …………… .. Adverse outcome e.g.; Risk of outcome without therapy ( baseline risk )  X  ( = 20 % or 0.20 ) Risk of outcome with therapy  Y  ( = 15% 0r 0.15)
Absolute risk reduction= X -- Y 0.20-0.15= 0.05 Relative risk ( RR )= Y / X = 0.15 /0.20 = 0.75 Relative risk reduction ( RRR ) = { X -- Y/ X  }  x 100 %  = 0.05 / 0.2 x 100%= 25 % i.e :  therapy reduced the risk of the outcome by 25 % relative to that occurring among the controls
the greater the RRR, the more effective the therapy.
Example: M.I patients receiving medical treatment have a chance of 404/1324=0.305 or 30.5% of being dead at 10 years.  Let us call this risk  x . Patients randomised to coronary artery bypass grafting have a chance of 350/1325=0.264 or 26.4% of being dead at 10 years. Let us call this risk  y .
RR The relative risk of death — that is, the risk in surgically treated patients compared with medically treated controls — is  y/x  or 0.264/0.305=0.87 (87%).
RRR The relative risk reduction — that is, the amount by which the risk of death is reduced by the surgery — is 100%-87% (1- y / x )=13%.
ARR The absolute risk reduction (or risk difference) — that is, the absolute amount by which surgical treatment reduces the risk of death at 10 years — is 30.5%-26.4%=4.1% (0.041).
NNT The number needed to treat — how many patients need coronary artery bypass grafting in order to prevent, on average, one death after 10 years — is the reciprocal of the absolute risk reduction: 1/ARR=1/0.041=24.
Conclusion to be able to effectively conduct research to be able to read and evaluate journal articles to further develop critical thinking and analytic skills to know when you need to hire outside statistical help

More Related Content

PPTX
Introduction to medical statistics
PPTX
PPTX
NNT: Number Needed to Treat
PPT
Why to know statistics
PPTX
Common measures of association in medical research (UPDATED) 2013
PPT
Dr Vivek Baliga - The Basics Of Medical Statistics
Introduction to medical statistics
NNT: Number Needed to Treat
Why to know statistics
Common measures of association in medical research (UPDATED) 2013
Dr Vivek Baliga - The Basics Of Medical Statistics

What's hot (20)

PDF
Repeated events analyses
KEY
Medical Statistics Pt 1
PPT
Statistics tests and Probablity
PPTX
Estimating risk
PPTX
Very good statistics-overview rbc (1)
PPT
Fallacies indrayan
PPTX
ODDS RATIO AND RELATIVE RISK EVALUATION
PPTX
Hazard ratios
PPTX
Analyzing the randomised control trial (rct)
PPTX
Sample size calculation - a brief overview
PPTX
ODDS RATIO & MENTEL-HAESZEL ODDS RATIO
PPTX
Odds ratios (Basic concepts)
PPSX
Relative and Attributable Risk For Graduate and Postgraduate Students
PPTX
Predictive Medicine
PPT
5. Calculate samplesize for case-control studies
PPTX
Establishment Of reference Interval
PPTX
Bio statistical analysis in clinical research
PPT
Testing Hypothesis
PPT
Peds journal club 2 -diagnostic test
PPTX
To Cochrane or not: that's the question
Repeated events analyses
Medical Statistics Pt 1
Statistics tests and Probablity
Estimating risk
Very good statistics-overview rbc (1)
Fallacies indrayan
ODDS RATIO AND RELATIVE RISK EVALUATION
Hazard ratios
Analyzing the randomised control trial (rct)
Sample size calculation - a brief overview
ODDS RATIO & MENTEL-HAESZEL ODDS RATIO
Odds ratios (Basic concepts)
Relative and Attributable Risk For Graduate and Postgraduate Students
Predictive Medicine
5. Calculate samplesize for case-control studies
Establishment Of reference Interval
Bio statistical analysis in clinical research
Testing Hypothesis
Peds journal club 2 -diagnostic test
To Cochrane or not: that's the question
Ad

Viewers also liked (8)

PPT
Evidence of influence
PPTX
Research Design
PPT
Evidence based medicine
PPTX
So much evidence
PPT
Evidence based general kasr einy
PPT
Epidemiology of endometriosis
PPT
Thromboprophylaxis
PPT
Management of poor ovarian response
Evidence of influence
Research Design
Evidence based medicine
So much evidence
Evidence based general kasr einy
Epidemiology of endometriosis
Thromboprophylaxis
Management of poor ovarian response
Ad

Similar to Why to know statistics (20)

PPTX
Introduction to critical appraisal
PPT
Quantitative critical appraisal october 2015
PPTX
How to do the maths
PPT
Critical Appriaisal Skills Basic 1 | May 4th 2011
 
PPT
Meta analysis
PPT
Copenhagen 2008
PDF
Risk Comparison
PPTX
Statistics for Medical Students to learn Basics
PDF
Introduction to small samples binomial inference
PDF
Difference of Proportions, Relative Risk, Odds Ratio
PPTX
Quick introduction to critical appraisal of quantitative research
DOCX
ASU Health Medical Odds Ratio for Lorcaserin Producing Questions.docx
PPT
Quantitative Synthesis I
DOCX
Statistics for critical appraisal made easy
PPT
Analysis and Interpretation
PDF
RCT Critical Appraisal - Results
PDF
introduction to biostatistics in clinical trials
PDF
introduction to biostatistics in clinical trials
PDF
Biostatistics and epidemiology 01stats20
PPTX
Mathematics in Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Medical Booklet Series by Dr. ...
Introduction to critical appraisal
Quantitative critical appraisal october 2015
How to do the maths
Critical Appriaisal Skills Basic 1 | May 4th 2011
 
Meta analysis
Copenhagen 2008
Risk Comparison
Statistics for Medical Students to learn Basics
Introduction to small samples binomial inference
Difference of Proportions, Relative Risk, Odds Ratio
Quick introduction to critical appraisal of quantitative research
ASU Health Medical Odds Ratio for Lorcaserin Producing Questions.docx
Quantitative Synthesis I
Statistics for critical appraisal made easy
Analysis and Interpretation
RCT Critical Appraisal - Results
introduction to biostatistics in clinical trials
introduction to biostatistics in clinical trials
Biostatistics and epidemiology 01stats20
Mathematics in Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Medical Booklet Series by Dr. ...

More from Hesham Gaber (20)

PPT
High responders
PPT
Prognostic models
PPT
GnRH antagonists
PPT
PPT
Infertility
PPT
So much evidence 1
PPT
So much evidence 1
PPT
Contraception
PPT
Management of poor ovarian response
PPT
Pattern of vitamin d receptor polymorphism
PPT
Uterine sarcoma
PPT
Systematic review
PPT
Statistics & infertility
PPT
Research methodology 101
PPT
Randomised controlled trials
PPT
Paternal age
PPT
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
PPT
Management of ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women
PPT
Male infertility
PPT
Intersexuality
High responders
Prognostic models
GnRH antagonists
Infertility
So much evidence 1
So much evidence 1
Contraception
Management of poor ovarian response
Pattern of vitamin d receptor polymorphism
Uterine sarcoma
Systematic review
Statistics & infertility
Research methodology 101
Randomised controlled trials
Paternal age
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Management of ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women
Male infertility
Intersexuality

Recently uploaded (20)

PPT
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
PPT
CHAPTER FIVE. '' Association in epidemiological studies and potential errors
PPTX
DENTAL CARIES FOR DENTISTRY STUDENT.pptx
PPTX
CME 2 Acute Chest Pain preentation for education
PPT
OPIOID ANALGESICS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS
PPTX
Respiratory drugs, drugs acting on the respi system
PPT
Management of Acute Kidney Injury at LAUTECH
PDF
Khadir.pdf Acacia catechu drug Ayurvedic medicine
PPTX
Acid Base Disorders educational power point.pptx
PPTX
Slider: TOC sampling methods for cleaning validation
PPTX
Uterus anatomy embryology, and clinical aspects
PDF
Human Health And Disease hggyutgghg .pdf
PPTX
Pathophysiology And Clinical Features Of Peripheral Nervous System .pptx
PPT
ASRH Presentation for students and teachers 2770633.ppt
PPTX
NEET PG 2025 Pharmacology Recall | Real Exam Questions from 3rd August with D...
PDF
Medical Evidence in the Criminal Justice Delivery System in.pdf
PPTX
JUVENILE NASOPHARYNGEAL ANGIOFIBROMA.pptx
DOCX
NEET PG 2025 | Pharmacology Recall: 20 High-Yield Questions Simplified
PPTX
Gastroschisis- Clinical Overview 18112311
PDF
Deadly Stampede at Yaounde’s Olembe Stadium Forensic.pdf
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
CHAPTER FIVE. '' Association in epidemiological studies and potential errors
DENTAL CARIES FOR DENTISTRY STUDENT.pptx
CME 2 Acute Chest Pain preentation for education
OPIOID ANALGESICS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS
Respiratory drugs, drugs acting on the respi system
Management of Acute Kidney Injury at LAUTECH
Khadir.pdf Acacia catechu drug Ayurvedic medicine
Acid Base Disorders educational power point.pptx
Slider: TOC sampling methods for cleaning validation
Uterus anatomy embryology, and clinical aspects
Human Health And Disease hggyutgghg .pdf
Pathophysiology And Clinical Features Of Peripheral Nervous System .pptx
ASRH Presentation for students and teachers 2770633.ppt
NEET PG 2025 Pharmacology Recall | Real Exam Questions from 3rd August with D...
Medical Evidence in the Criminal Justice Delivery System in.pdf
JUVENILE NASOPHARYNGEAL ANGIOFIBROMA.pptx
NEET PG 2025 | Pharmacology Recall: 20 High-Yield Questions Simplified
Gastroschisis- Clinical Overview 18112311
Deadly Stampede at Yaounde’s Olembe Stadium Forensic.pdf

Why to know statistics

  • 1. Why to know statistics
  • 3. Example One of your colleague is an oncology surgeon 60% of his cases died Does this mean that he is a looser!!
  • 4. We should ask what are the results of his colleagues in similar patients How many patients he operated upon e.g 2/3!!!!
  • 6. Example Diastolic Blood pressure 80,70,65,90,74,80,60,90,60,75,80,90,100,100,100,95 Age 24,30,26,40,28,21,26,31,32,36,27,45,62,58,52,50,60
  • 7. Vital for research Without the use of statistics it would be very difficult to make decisions based on the data collected from a research project
  • 8. Statistical steps in research Collect data Organise data Analyse data Interpret the data Present the data
  • 9. How to read the results An understanding of basic statistics will provide you with the fundamental skills necessary to read and evaluate results section in published papers
  • 10. Are groups comparable!!! the baseline characteristics of the groups being studied should be comparable If not, they should be adjusted for differences
  • 11. statistical tests Are they frequently used tests!! If not, why!!
  • 12. Are the data analysed according to the original protocol?
  • 13. Was follow- up complete? Patients lost to follow-up ……… loss of subjects bias > 10% - 15 % ………………… ..invalid results
  • 14. P value A P value of <0.05 means that this result would have arisen by chance on less than one occasion in 20
  • 15. Standardization of measures of outcome: Odds and odds ratio The odds is the number of patients who fulfil the criteria for a given endpoint divided by the number of patients who do not.
  • 16. For example the odds of diarrhoea during treatment with an antibiotic in a group of 10 patients may be 4 to 6 (4 with diarrhoea divided by 6 without, 0.66); in a control group the odds may be 1 to 9 (0.11). The odds ratio of treatment to control group would be 6 (0.66÷0.11).
  • 17. Risk and relative risk The risk is the number of patients who fulfil the criteria for a given end point divided by the total number of patients.
  • 18. For example, the risk of diarrhoea during treatment with an antibiotic in a group of 10 patients may be 4 to 10; in the control group the risks may be 1 to 10. The relative risk of treatment to control group would be 4 (0.4÷0.1).
  • 19. C.I The confidence interval around a result in a clinical trial indicates the limits within which the &quot;real&quot; difference between the treatments is likely to lie, hence the strength of the inference that can be drawn from the result
  • 20. Example: 95 % CI for RRR 25 % : sample size 100 …………… .= -- 38 % to 59 % Sample size 1000 ………… .= 9 % to 41 % The larger the sample size , the narrower and more precise the CI , and the greater our confidence that the true RRR is closer to what we have observed .
  • 21. OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.23 - 0.52 Odds Ratio < 1  decreased risk Confidence Interval does not cross 1  statistically significant
  • 22. A statistically significant result may not be clinically significant.
  • 23. The results of intervention trials should be expressed in terms of the likely benefit an individual could expect (for example, the absolute risk reduction)
  • 24. How large was the treatment effect ? Treatment effect …………… .. Adverse outcome e.g.; Risk of outcome without therapy ( baseline risk ) X ( = 20 % or 0.20 ) Risk of outcome with therapy Y ( = 15% 0r 0.15)
  • 25. Absolute risk reduction= X -- Y 0.20-0.15= 0.05 Relative risk ( RR )= Y / X = 0.15 /0.20 = 0.75 Relative risk reduction ( RRR ) = { X -- Y/ X } x 100 % = 0.05 / 0.2 x 100%= 25 % i.e : therapy reduced the risk of the outcome by 25 % relative to that occurring among the controls
  • 26. the greater the RRR, the more effective the therapy.
  • 27. Example: M.I patients receiving medical treatment have a chance of 404/1324=0.305 or 30.5% of being dead at 10 years. Let us call this risk x . Patients randomised to coronary artery bypass grafting have a chance of 350/1325=0.264 or 26.4% of being dead at 10 years. Let us call this risk y .
  • 28. RR The relative risk of death — that is, the risk in surgically treated patients compared with medically treated controls — is y/x or 0.264/0.305=0.87 (87%).
  • 29. RRR The relative risk reduction — that is, the amount by which the risk of death is reduced by the surgery — is 100%-87% (1- y / x )=13%.
  • 30. ARR The absolute risk reduction (or risk difference) — that is, the absolute amount by which surgical treatment reduces the risk of death at 10 years — is 30.5%-26.4%=4.1% (0.041).
  • 31. NNT The number needed to treat — how many patients need coronary artery bypass grafting in order to prevent, on average, one death after 10 years — is the reciprocal of the absolute risk reduction: 1/ARR=1/0.041=24.
  • 32. Conclusion to be able to effectively conduct research to be able to read and evaluate journal articles to further develop critical thinking and analytic skills to know when you need to hire outside statistical help