WI vs TX Education
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like326 views
The document reviews the performance of U.S. students in math and reading compared to other OECD countries, highlighting that the U.S. consistently ranks below the OECD average, especially in math. Specifically, in 2012, the U.S. ranked 17th in reading and 27th in math, with Wisconsin estimated to rank 13th in both subjects based on NAEP results. The data suggests significant disparities in proficiency levels among states and demographic groups, indicating that the performance of Wisconsin would likely fall in the middle internationally in reading but in the bottom third for math when adjusting for demographics.
WI vs TX Education
- 1. How Are We Doing? Wisconsin2.org
- 2. How Are We Doing? On every occasion, the US has ranked below the OECD average in Math, and has hovered around the average in Reading. PISA – International Ranking Any other countries you want to add here??? In 2012, 3 US states took the PISA. Their scores are performing vs. the rest of the USA. (It does not benchmark as we do vs. the world for education. Reading Math MA: 527 514 CT: 521 506 FL: 492 467 WI (Est.) 503 508 Wisconsin estimate based on performance relative to MA, CT, FL, and US, on NAEP 2011-13 average. 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 PISA: Reading US Canada Singapore OECD Avg 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 PISA: Math
- 3. How Are We Doing? Of the 34 OECD nations participating, the US is consistently in the bottom third in Math, and around the middle in ranking in Reading. The US ranked 17th and 27th in Reading and Math in 2012. Based on Wisconsin NAEP results, it would have ranked 13th in both subjects in 2012. PISA – International Ranking
- 4. How Are We Doing? A study by Hanushek et al* examined by US state the percentage of students scoring at a proficient level or above on the NAEP. They then compared the states with other countries, using PISA. The table shows how US states compare with other countries in Math, based on the 2009 PISA and 2011 NAEP. * Source: PISA – International Ranking, Math Table 1 from: http://w w w .hks.harvard.edu/pepg/PDF/Papers/PEPG11-03_GloballyChallenged.pdf Percentages of students in the class of 2011 at the profieicient level in math per state. Foreign jurisdictions with similar and higher percentages at the proficient level in math in overall student population. State % Proficient Significantly Outperformed by 1 Massachusetts 50.7 6 Canada • Japan • Netherlands • New Zealand • Sw itzerland 2 Minnesota 43.1 11 Australia • Belgium • France • Germany • Netherlands 3 Vermont 41.4 14 Australia • Denmark • Estonia • France • Germany 4 North Dakota 41.0 16 Denmark • Estonia • France • Iceland 5 New Jersey 40.4 14 Australia • Austria • Denmark • France • Germany 6 Kansas 40.2 16 Austria • Denmark • Estonia • France • Slovenia 7 South Dakota 39.1 16 Austria • Denmark • France • Hungary • Sw eden 8 Pennsylvania 38.3 16 Austria • Denmark • France • Hungary • Sw eden 9 New Hampshire 37.9 18 Austria • Denmark • France • Hungary • Sw eden 10 Montana 37.6 18 Austria • France • Hungary • Poland • Sw eden 11 Virginia 37.5 17 Czech Rep • France • Hungary • Poland • Sw eden 12 Colorado 37.4 18 Austria • France • Hungary • Poland • Sw eden 13 Wisconsin 37.0 18 Czech Rep • France • Hungary • Poland • Sw eden 14 Maryland 36.5 18 Czech Rep • France • Hungary • Poland • U.K. 15 Wyoming 36.0 18 Czech Rep • France • Poland • Portugal • U.K. 16 Washington 35.9 19 Czech Rep • France • Hungary • Poland • U.K. 17 Ohio 35.4 18 Czech Rep • France • Poland • Portugal • U.K. 18 Iow a 35.2 19 Czech Rep • France • Poland • Portugal • U.K. 19 Indiana 35.1 19 Czech Rep • France • Poland • Portugal • U.K. 20 Oregon 34.8 20 Czech Rep • Hungary • Poland • Portugal • U.K. 21 Connecticut 34.7 19 France • Poland • Portugal • Spain • U.K. 22 Texas 34.7 21 Czech Rep • Hungary • Poland • Portugal • U.K. 23 Nebraska 34.6 20 Czech Rep • Hungary • Poland • Portugal • U.K. 24 North Carolina 34.5 21 Czech Rep • Hungary • Poland • Portugal • U.K. 25 Maine 34.1 22 Czech Rep • Hungary • Poland • Portugal • U.K. 26 Idaho 34.1 22 Czech Rep • Hungary • Poland • Portugal • U.K. 27 Utah 32.4 26 Italy • Poland • Portugal • Spain • U.K. 28 Alaska 32.2 26 Italy • Poland • Portugal • Spain • U.K. US 32.2 22 Italy • Latvia • Poland • Spain • U.K. 29 South Carolina 31.9 26 Italy • Poland • Portugal • Spain • U.K. 30 Delaw are 31.3 28 Hungary • Italy • Portugal • Spain • U.K. 31 Illinois 30.8 27 Czech Rep • Italy • Portugal • Spain • U.K. 32 New York 30.2 28 Hungary • Italy • Portugal • Spain • U.K. 33 Missouri 29.9 28 Hungary • Italy • Portugal • Spain • U.K. 34 Michigan 28.9 30 Ireland • Italy • Lithuania • Portugal • Spain 35 Rhode Island 27.7 34 Latvia • Lithuania 36 Florida 27.4 34 Greece • Latvia • Lithuania 37 Kentucky 27.3 34 Latvia • Lithuania 38 Arizona 26.3 34 Greece • Latvia • Lithuania 39 Georgia 24.7 35 Greece • Latvia • Russia 40 Arkansas 24.4 35 Croatia • Greece • Israel • Latvia • Russia 41 California 23.9 36 Greece • Russia 42 Tennessee 23.1 36 Croatia • Greece • Israel • Russia • Turkey 43 Nevada 23.0 36 Croatia • Greece • Israel • Russia 44 Oklahoma 21.3 36 Croatia • Greece • Israel • Russia • Turkey 45 Haw aii 21.2 38 Croatia • Israel • Russia • Turkey 46 Louisiana 19.0 39 Bulgaria • Croatia • Israel • Serbia • Turkey 47 West Virginia 18.5 41 Bulgaria • Turkey 48 Alabama 18.2 39 Bulgaria • Croatia • Israel • Serbia • Turkey 49 New Mexico 17.4 41 Bulgaria • Serbia • Turkey 50 Mississippi 13.6 43 Bulgaria • Trin & Tobago • Uruguay 51 Dist of Columbia 8.0 48 Kazakhstan • Mexico • Thailand US Asians 49.6 US Whites 41.8 US Blacks 11.0 US Hispanics 15.4 Countries w ith similar percentages of proficient students http://w w w .hks.harvard.edu/pepg/PDF/Papers/PEPG11- 03_GloballyChallenged.pdf
- 5. How Are We Doing? The table shows how US states compare with other countries in Reading, based on the 2009 PISA and 2011 NAEP. Wisconsin ranks 19th in the country. PISA – International Ranking, Reading Table 2 http://w w w .hks.harvard.edu/pepg/PDF/Papers/PEPG11-03_GloballyChallenged.pdf Percentages of students in the class of 2011 at the proficient level in reading per state. Foreign jurisdictions with similar and higher percentages at the proficeint level in reading in overall student populaiton. State % Proficient Significantly Outperformed by 1 Massachusetts 43.0 1 Canada • Finland • Japan • Korea • Singapore 2 Vermont 42.1 3 Canada • Japan • Korea • New Zealand • Singapore 3 New Jersey 39.0 5 Australia • Belgium • Canada • Japan • Netherlands 4 Montana 38.9 5 Australia • Belgium • Canada • Japan • Netherlands 5 New Hampshire 37.2 8 Australia • Belgium • Liechtenstein • Netherlands 6 Connecticut 37.1 7 Australia • Belgium • France • Japan • Netherlands 7 Maine 36.9 8 Australia • Belgium • Liechtenstein • Netherlands 8 South Dakota 36.8 5 Australia • Canada • France • Japan • Netherlands 9 Minnesota 36.6 8 Australia • Belgium • Liechtenstein • Netherlands 10 Pennsylvania 36.4 8 Australia • Belgium • France • Liechtenstein • Netherlands 11 Ohio 35.9 8 Australia • Belgium • France • Liechtenstein • Netherlands 12 Iow a 35.7 8 Australia • Belgium • France • Liechtenstein • Netherlands 13 Kansas 35.2 9 Belgium • France • Liechtenstein • Netherlands 14 Nebraska 35.0 9 Belgium • France • Liechtenstein • Netherlands 15 Colorado 34.6 8 Australia • Belgium • France • Germany • Netherlands 16 Washington 34.1 10 France • Germany • Netherlands • Norw ay • Sw itzerland 17 Oregon 34.0 8 Australia • France • Germany • Poland • Sw itzerland 18 Virginia 33.7 9 Belgium • France • Germany • Netherlands • Poland 19 Wisconsin 33.2 10 France • Germany • Hungary • Netherlands • Poland 20 Wyoming 33.2 10 France • Germany • Netherlands • Norw ay • Sw itzerland 21 Maryland 33.2 10 France • Germany • Netherlands • Poland • Sw eden 22 New York 32.2 10 France • Germany • Hungary • Netherlands • Poland 23 North Dakota 32.2 10 France • Germany • Hungary • Netherlands • Poland 24 Idaho 31.6 10 France • Germany • Netherlands • Poland • U.K. US 31.2 10 France • Germany • Netherlands • Poland • U.K. 25 Indiana 31.1 10 France • Germany • Netherlands • Poland • U.K. 26 Missouri 31.0 10 France • Germany • Netherlands • Poland • U.K. 27 Delaw are 30.5 10 France • Germany • Netherlands • Poland • U.K. 28 Utah 30.1 10 France • Germany • Netherlands • Poland • U.K. 29 Illinois 29.8 10 France • Germany • Poland • Taiw an • U.K. 30 Michigan 28.2 14 Germany • Italy • Poland • Taiw an • U.K. 31 Florida 28.0 15 Italy • Netherlands • Poland • Taiw an • U.K. 32 North Carolina 28.0 15 Israel • Italy • Netherlands • Poland • U.K. 33 Kentucky 27.7 15 Greece • Italy • Netherlands • Poland • U.K. 34 Texas 27.5 16 Greece • Italy • Netherlands • Portugal • U.K. 35 Rhode Island 27.2 19 Greece • Hungary • Italy • Portugal • U.K. 36 Alaska 27.1 19 Greece • Hungary • Italy • Portugal • U.K. 37 Oklahoma 26.1 20 Greece • Hungary • Italy • Portugal • Slovenia 38 Georgia 25.6 20 Greece • Hungary • Israel • Italy • Portugal 39 Tennessee 25.6 20 Greece • Hungary • Israel • Italy • Portugal 40 Arkansas 25.4 21 Greece • Hungary • Israel • Italy • Portugal 41 South Carolina 24.6 21 Greece • Hungary • Israel • Italy • Portugal 42 Arizona 24.3 23 Denmark • Greece • Israel • Portugal • Spain 43 West Virginia 22.9 28 Croatia • Czech Rep • Greece • Portugal • Spain 44 Nevada 21.5 31 Austria • Croatia • Czech Rep • Slovakia • Spain 45 California 21.5 31 Austria • Croatia • Czech Rep • Slovakia • Spain 46 Alabama 21.2 31 Austria • Croatia • Czech Rep • Slovakia • Spain 47 Haw aii 20.3 34 Croatia • Latvia • Slovakia 48 Louisiana 19.4 35 Croatia • Latvia • Lithuania 49 Mississippi 17.4 37 Bulgaria • Croatia • Lithuania • Russia • Turkey 50 New Mexico 17.3 39 Bulgaria • Lithuania • Turkey 51 Dist of Columbia 12.1 41 Bulgaria • Chile • Trinidad • Turkey Countries w ith similar percentages of proficient students
- 6. How Are We Doing? Unfortunately, we do not have the detailed data to make an accurate estimate of how Wisconsin would have performed on the PISA if it had a demographic distribution comparable to the US overall. The NAEP results showed US Asians and Whites performed far better than US Blacks and Hispanics. Adjusting the WI results for that demography would likely place the state in the middle of the pack internationally in Reading, and in the bottom third for Math. PISA – International Ranking
Editor's Notes
- #3: from: 'C:\SchoolTesting\NAEP\[PISA.xls]Hist! 'C:\SchoolTesting\NAEP\[NAEP 2013 Hist Analysis v2.xls]Math2013!; Math03!; Read2013!; Read03!
- #4: from: 'C:\SchoolTesting\NAEP\[NAEP 2013 Hist Analysis v2.xls]Rank! from: 'C:\SchoolTesting\NAEP\[PISA.xls]Hist! 'C:\SchoolTesting\NAEP\[NAEP 2013 Hist Analysis v2.xls]Math2013!; Math03!; Read2013!; Read03!
- #5: from: 'C:\SchoolTesting\NAEP\[NAEP 2013 Hist Analysis v2.xls]Rank! 'C:\SchoolTesting\NAEP\[NAEP 2013 Hist Analysis v2.xls]Math2013!; Math03!; Read2013!; Read03!
- #6: from: 'C:\SchoolTesting\NAEP\[NAEP 2013 Hist Analysis v2.xls]Rank! 'C:\SchoolTesting\NAEP\[NAEP 2013 Hist Analysis v2.xls]Math2013!; Math03!; Read2013!; Read03!
- #7: from: 'C:\SchoolTesting\NAEP\[NAEP 2013 Hist Analysis v2.xls]Rank! 'C:\SchoolTesting\NAEP\[NAEP 2013 Hist Analysis v2.xls]Math2013!; Math03!; Read2013!; Read03!