Working Towards Eliminating Surgical Site Infections
Jason Parkvold RN, BSN and Diane McDougall RN BA, BSN
SUNRISE HEALTH REGION
www.qualitysummit.ca
#QS14
Faculty/Presenter Disclosure
Faculty: Jason Parkvold RN, BSN and Diane McDougall RN BA, BSN
Relationships with commercial interest:
• Warming Devices for trial (3M)
• Dressings for Trail (Convatec)
Disclosure of Commercial Support
• This program has received in-kind support from [3M Canada] in the form of
[Educational training and warming equipment for trial]
• This program has received in-kind support from [Convatec] in the form of
[Educational training and two boxes of dressings for the trial]
Potential for Conflict(s) of Interest:
• [3M Canada and Convatec][developed/licenses/distributes/benefits from the
sale of] a product that will be discussed in this program: [Bear Hugger Warmers
and AQUACEL Surgical Dressings]
Mitigating Potential Bias
• No financial incentive has been provided to either of the presenters. Only the
equipment or supplies used during the trial were provided to the health region by
either company. Contracts are in place to purchase any supplies found beneficial
after the trials ended.
Who are we?
•We are a medium sized
health provider in Eastern
Saskatchewan.
•We service a population of
approximately 60,000 people
within the health region.
•We also provide surgical
services to a large area of
Western Manitoba.
Why did Sunrise undertake this the Surgical
Site Infection (SSI) project
• We set out to reduce the issues
of time and suffering that
patients endure with a post
surgical infection.
• As well we wanted to look at
ways to reduce the unnecessary
use of health region resources to
treat people who develop a
Surgical Site Infections by
stopping them from occurring.
How do you Identify the issues?
• We used the Canadian Patient Safety Institute SSI bundle.
• SSI indicators that were being used to identify infections Provincially,
Nationally and Internationally.
• Set up surveillance standards based on the criteria found in this
research.
• Talked with Staff and Physicians.
Where did we begin?
• We picked the two high risk surgeries
noted in the literature that we
perform. Colorectal surgery and
Caesarian Sections.
• We did a 6 month retrospective data
analysis of all of these surgeries from
2010 so that we could have a baseline
to compare our ongoing surgical data.
• We began monthly auditing of all
cases in these two surgical categories.
What did we find?
• We found trends that needed work:
• Inter-operative temperatures were being
recorded infrequently and many of our
patients were hypothermic after surgery
• Rates of infection were higher in our
clean (little or no bacterial contamination)
surgical cases than our dirty (Moderate to
High contamination ) surgical cases
• We rarely gave patients prophylactic
antibiotics within the hour prior to the
initial cut being performed
What did this lead us to do?
• We first focused on our temperature
readings
• We instituted a policy that stated any
surgery over 30 minutes would require an
inter-operative temperature to be taken.
• We provided the surgical team with
esophageal temperature probes
• With the data from these successes we
were then able to assess that
approximately 20-25 percent of our patients
were hypothermic in any given quarter of
the year.
• We then looked at what we were
doing to keep these patients
warm
• We gave warmed fluids
• Covered them with warmed
blankets
• The temperature of the theaters
is very difficult to regulate so it
tends to vary through out the
year depending on the external
temperature
• We had a warming blanket
placed on the table under the
patient’s back
• None of these interventions was
enough to stop 20-25% of our
patient population from coming out
of the theater cold
• We looked at what other systems
were available to help us keep the
patients warm
• We found that the current company
whose equipment we had in the
theater made a total body warming
device “Bear Paws units”
• We decided to trial it to see what
kind of difference it would make
25
75
Hypothermic Patients
Throughout the Surgical
Procedure
Hypothermic
• We ran a trial on 30
clients
• We used our normal
temperature monitoring
protocol on all of these
clients
• These clients could be
warmed prior to surgery,
while surgery occurred
and post surgery
• What we found was that 90% of
clients maintained normal body
temperature 36-38 degrees
• Of the 10% that did not maintain
normal body temperature only
one client was hypothermic
through out the inter-operative
period
• All clients (100%) prior to
leaving recovery had returned to
the normal body temperature
range
10
90
Normothermia during the Surgical
Procedure
Hypothermia
Normothermic
Antibiotics within 60 minutes
• We also focused in on timely
antibiotic administration
• This was noted to be an issue
and was the focus of one of our
first Mistake Proofing Projects
• What was found was that we
were providing antibiotic
prophylaxis to our surgical
patients within 60 minutes to
less than 30% of our patients
30
70
Prophylactic Antibiotics
Within 60
Minutes
Outside 60
Minutes
Why was this?
• Well it was a combination of
issues
• Different standing order sets
from our surgeon’s
• The use of multiple antibiotics
prior to surgery
• No consistent method of
informing the unit preparing the
patient of the time patient
would enter the theater
What did we do?
•We standardized order sets
for Colorectal and C-Section
procedures for all surgeons
•We tried multiple PDSAs on
the best method of
communicating when patient
will be entering theater
•We started using surgical
pause to ensure antibiotic
started prior to incision
• We did multiple sets of staff and
physician education on why it was
important to have the antibiotics
delivered within 60 minutes
• We had pharmacy research
appropriate drug administration
rates for the staff so that they could
meet the time requirements with
multiple drugs
• As of Dec 2013 our rate of
appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis is
now 93% and we continue to look at
ways to improve this number.
93
7
Propholactic Antibiotic Rate
Within 60
Minutes
Outside 60
Minutes
Wound Management
• Our final improvement process has
been to trial alternate dressings for
our C-Section patients
• The reason for this is that a C-Section
should never be a dirty procedure
• This surgical category consistently
had our highest rate of Surgical
infections
• The majority of these infections were
superficial infections
• Looking at the indicators for this
procedure it became clear that
two indicators showed up on the
majority of the SSI cases
• The indicators were weight
above 70 KG and removal of
dressing within 24 hours
• As well most of these cases were
discharged home within 48
hours of the procedure
occurring
• Since most of the infections
occurred within 7-10 days of the
procedure what could we do?
• Our current practice at the time
was to apply a standard dressing
and generally remove it at 24
hours
• This wound would then be
cleaned and have a dressing
spray applied
• The patient would then
generally be discharged home
• A search of the current literature
was done as well as discussions
with other health regions
around the province
• What was found was that there
was no set protocol for wound
management within the
literature let alone the province
• Through the search of the
literature what was found was a
dressing that allowed good
mobility, was waterproof and
provided a physical barrier
How could we change this process?
• We could look for a dressing that
stayed intact for a longer time
period
• One that was an active barrier to
bacteria and waterproof so that
it would allow the patients to
have an active lifestyle once
discharged
• A trial of the “Aquacel” dressing
was planned
• One surgeon trialed the dressing while the other two Obstetricians
decided to maintain their current practice
• They provided us with wonderful groups to compare the results
• In the trial group we had 15 surgeries. Out of this group we had 1
infection and this dressing we had difficulties getting proper adhesion
of the dressing.
• In the current practice group we had 17 surgeries and 3 infections.
1
14
Trial Patients
Infections
Total Cases
3
14
Current Practice
Infections
Total Cases
• The difference in the rate between the two surgical groups was 62%
more surgical infections for the current practice.
• Since running this trial we have had a second Obstetrician and a
locum Obstetrician start using this dressing.
• As well we have had interest in our General Surgery program in
starting to use this dressing in our abdominal cases with an open
incision.
What has been the impact of these changes?
• We have had comments from patients:
• “I have never before came out of surgery and been warm”
• “I couldn’t even tell where my incision was as there was no redness
along the spot where they cut”
• “ The dressing allowed me to shower when ever I wanted to once I
got home”
• Staff comments:
• “The dressings are easy to use”
• “The warming device is easy to control and can be turned off once
patient maintains normal temperature in the recovery period”
• “I am seeing good wound bed healing in my office on follow up visits”
• System improvements:
• Noted reduction of C-Section infections in the quarter the dressing
trial was conducted
Cost savings for treatment of each one of
those infections:
• The reduction of at least one
antibiotic prescription
• The reduction of at least one
Physician/Outpatient visit
• Not needing Home Care Services
providing wound care
• Not incurring a readmission
and/or a possible further OR
procedure
• 2 Dollars – 380 Dollars Per
Prescription
• 33.20 Dollars – 230 Dollars Per
visit
• 20 Dollars – 300 Dollars Per visit
• 418 Dollars – 1319 Dollars Per
bed day (not including
treatments)
• All Costs are ranges: actual cost
will vary
Sooner Safer Smarter – Patient First :
• Saving to the patient:
• No Extra lost work time for the patients due to an infection after
surgery
• No costly trips for additional health care services
• No additional stress about the ongoing healing process
Questions?
Contact Me:
Jason Parkvold
Sunrise Health Region
Clinical Improvement Facilitator
jason.parkvold@shr.sk.ca
www.qualitysummit.ca
#QS14

More Related Content

PDF
Prevention of Surgical Site Infection- SSI [compatibility mode]
PPTX
SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS an update working protocol
PPT
surgical site infection
PPTX
Prevention of Surgical Site Infection
PPT
Surgical site infection
PPTX
Surgical Site Infections
PPT
Ssi ;problems&prevention
PDF
Atlas surgical site infection
Prevention of Surgical Site Infection- SSI [compatibility mode]
SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS an update working protocol
surgical site infection
Prevention of Surgical Site Infection
Surgical site infection
Surgical Site Infections
Ssi ;problems&prevention
Atlas surgical site infection

What's hot (20)

PDF
Surgical Site Infections (SSI)
PPTX
Surgical site-infection
PPTX
Surgical Site Infection updated by Manojit(MS)
PPTX
Surgical site infection& amp dr. anil ganju
PPTX
surgical site infection
PPTX
Surgical Site infections
PPTX
Surgical site infection
PPT
Prevention of perioperative infection
PDF
Fresh from the press: Updated best practices in Surgical Site Infection Preve...
PPTX
Surgical Site Infection- SSI by Okoye
PPTX
SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS PREVENTION AND CARE
PPTX
Prevention of surgical site infections: WHO global guidelines 2016
PPTX
Surgical site infections
PPTX
Surgical site infection - Recent Guidelines
PPT
Surgical Site Infection
PPTX
Ssi(woundcon 2016)
PPT
Surgical site infection (2)
PPT
Surgical Wound Classification
PPTX
Surgical site infection
PPTX
Surgical site infections
Surgical Site Infections (SSI)
Surgical site-infection
Surgical Site Infection updated by Manojit(MS)
Surgical site infection& amp dr. anil ganju
surgical site infection
Surgical Site infections
Surgical site infection
Prevention of perioperative infection
Fresh from the press: Updated best practices in Surgical Site Infection Preve...
Surgical Site Infection- SSI by Okoye
SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS PREVENTION AND CARE
Prevention of surgical site infections: WHO global guidelines 2016
Surgical site infections
Surgical site infection - Recent Guidelines
Surgical Site Infection
Ssi(woundcon 2016)
Surgical site infection (2)
Surgical Wound Classification
Surgical site infection
Surgical site infections
Ad

Similar to Working Towards Eliminating Surgical Site Infections (20)

PPT
Surgical_safety_checklistbyWHO consultant.ppt
PPT
Surgical safety checklist
PPT
Surgical safety checklist
PPTX
Patient-centric technology moves surgical care beyond the hospital walls
PDF
EWMA 2013-Ep446-ULTRASONIC ASSISTED WOUND DEBRIDEMENT – AN AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE
PDF
EWMA 2013-Ep446-ULTRASONIC ASSISTED WOUND DEBRIDEMENT – AN AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE
PPTX
Day care surgery by manjusb
PPT
Improving Surgical Safety and Patient Outcomes
PPTX
hvc-resident-session-1.pptx
PPTX
Emergency Care Including Bioterrorism_Student.pptx
PPTX
Shift hospital ICU to home ICU
PPTX
Fast Track Final
PPTX
Training and Accreditation.pptx
PDF
WHO-Suical-safety-checklist.pdffhhhhjkkkkk
PPTX
PCS PPT for HR -March 2018.pptx
PPTX
02 Delivery of Care (3).pptx
PDF
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust- Holistic appr...
PPTX
World Health Organization SURGICAL CHECKLIST.pptx
PPTX
Day case surgery_024824.pptx
Surgical_safety_checklistbyWHO consultant.ppt
Surgical safety checklist
Surgical safety checklist
Patient-centric technology moves surgical care beyond the hospital walls
EWMA 2013-Ep446-ULTRASONIC ASSISTED WOUND DEBRIDEMENT – AN AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE
EWMA 2013-Ep446-ULTRASONIC ASSISTED WOUND DEBRIDEMENT – AN AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE
Day care surgery by manjusb
Improving Surgical Safety and Patient Outcomes
hvc-resident-session-1.pptx
Emergency Care Including Bioterrorism_Student.pptx
Shift hospital ICU to home ICU
Fast Track Final
Training and Accreditation.pptx
WHO-Suical-safety-checklist.pdffhhhhjkkkkk
PCS PPT for HR -March 2018.pptx
02 Delivery of Care (3).pptx
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust- Holistic appr...
World Health Organization SURGICAL CHECKLIST.pptx
Day case surgery_024824.pptx
Ad

More from Saskatchewan Health Care Quality Summit (20)

PPT
The Development and Operationalization of a Mealtime Enhancement Training Vid...
PPTX
Fierce Conversations with Rachelle Brockman
PPTX
Paul Plsek: Bringing creativity and patient voice to our lean efforts
PPTX
Paul Plsek: Can We Be Both Lean AND Creative? The Virginia Mason Experience
PPTX
Paul Plsek: Leadership to Establish the Culture and Practices of Innovation
PPT
Optimizing the delivery of Chronic Disease Management-Quality Improvement (CD...
PPTX
Teamwork and Communication: The LEPS Project Benefits Both Students and Seniors
PPT
Engaging the 'Patient' in Patient Experience Surveying
PPT
The Development and Operationalization of a Mealtime Enhancment Training Vide...
PPT
20/20: Taylor Bassingthwaite
PPTX
PPTX
20/20: Dr. Ulrich Teucher
PPTX
PPTX
PPTX
Visual management - Leadership Support for the Front Line
PPTX
Translating an Emergency Department Wait Time Study to a Quality Improvement ...
PPTX
The Patient & Family Care Experience Program: Partnering with Our Future Prov...
The Development and Operationalization of a Mealtime Enhancement Training Vid...
Fierce Conversations with Rachelle Brockman
Paul Plsek: Bringing creativity and patient voice to our lean efforts
Paul Plsek: Can We Be Both Lean AND Creative? The Virginia Mason Experience
Paul Plsek: Leadership to Establish the Culture and Practices of Innovation
Optimizing the delivery of Chronic Disease Management-Quality Improvement (CD...
Teamwork and Communication: The LEPS Project Benefits Both Students and Seniors
Engaging the 'Patient' in Patient Experience Surveying
The Development and Operationalization of a Mealtime Enhancment Training Vide...
20/20: Taylor Bassingthwaite
20/20: Dr. Ulrich Teucher
Visual management - Leadership Support for the Front Line
Translating an Emergency Department Wait Time Study to a Quality Improvement ...
The Patient & Family Care Experience Program: Partnering with Our Future Prov...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
OSTEOMYELITIS and OSTEORADIONECROSIS.pptx
PDF
Back node with known primary managementt
PDF
Cardiovascular Disease & Obesity - Dr Cliff Wong
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 13
PPTX
Mortality rate in a teritiary care center of infia july stats sncu picu
PDF
crisisintervention-210721062718.presetationdf
PDF
crisisintervention-210721062718.presentatiodnf
PPTX
Acute renal failure.pptx for BNs 2nd year
PDF
Medical_Biology_and_Genetics_Current_Studies_I.pdf
PDF
health promotion and maintenance of elderly
PPT
heartap-240428112119-ec76d6fb.pp for studentt
PDF
cerebral aneurysm.. neurosurgery , anaesthesia
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 17
PPTX
1-back pain presentation presentation .pptx
PPTX
Wound care MNEMONICS MNEMONICS health care
PPTX
Nepal health service act.pptx by Sunil Sharma
PPTX
Carcinoma of the breastfgdvfgbddbdtr.pptx
PPTX
ACUTE CALCULAR CHOLECYSTITIS: A CASE STUDY
DOCX
PT10 continues to explose your mind right after reading
PDF
Culturally Sensitive Health Solutions: Engineering Localized Practices (www....
OSTEOMYELITIS and OSTEORADIONECROSIS.pptx
Back node with known primary managementt
Cardiovascular Disease & Obesity - Dr Cliff Wong
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 13
Mortality rate in a teritiary care center of infia july stats sncu picu
crisisintervention-210721062718.presetationdf
crisisintervention-210721062718.presentatiodnf
Acute renal failure.pptx for BNs 2nd year
Medical_Biology_and_Genetics_Current_Studies_I.pdf
health promotion and maintenance of elderly
heartap-240428112119-ec76d6fb.pp for studentt
cerebral aneurysm.. neurosurgery , anaesthesia
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 17
1-back pain presentation presentation .pptx
Wound care MNEMONICS MNEMONICS health care
Nepal health service act.pptx by Sunil Sharma
Carcinoma of the breastfgdvfgbddbdtr.pptx
ACUTE CALCULAR CHOLECYSTITIS: A CASE STUDY
PT10 continues to explose your mind right after reading
Culturally Sensitive Health Solutions: Engineering Localized Practices (www....

Working Towards Eliminating Surgical Site Infections

  • 1. Working Towards Eliminating Surgical Site Infections Jason Parkvold RN, BSN and Diane McDougall RN BA, BSN SUNRISE HEALTH REGION www.qualitysummit.ca #QS14
  • 2. Faculty/Presenter Disclosure Faculty: Jason Parkvold RN, BSN and Diane McDougall RN BA, BSN Relationships with commercial interest: • Warming Devices for trial (3M) • Dressings for Trail (Convatec)
  • 3. Disclosure of Commercial Support • This program has received in-kind support from [3M Canada] in the form of [Educational training and warming equipment for trial] • This program has received in-kind support from [Convatec] in the form of [Educational training and two boxes of dressings for the trial] Potential for Conflict(s) of Interest: • [3M Canada and Convatec][developed/licenses/distributes/benefits from the sale of] a product that will be discussed in this program: [Bear Hugger Warmers and AQUACEL Surgical Dressings]
  • 4. Mitigating Potential Bias • No financial incentive has been provided to either of the presenters. Only the equipment or supplies used during the trial were provided to the health region by either company. Contracts are in place to purchase any supplies found beneficial after the trials ended.
  • 5. Who are we? •We are a medium sized health provider in Eastern Saskatchewan. •We service a population of approximately 60,000 people within the health region. •We also provide surgical services to a large area of Western Manitoba.
  • 6. Why did Sunrise undertake this the Surgical Site Infection (SSI) project • We set out to reduce the issues of time and suffering that patients endure with a post surgical infection. • As well we wanted to look at ways to reduce the unnecessary use of health region resources to treat people who develop a Surgical Site Infections by stopping them from occurring.
  • 7. How do you Identify the issues? • We used the Canadian Patient Safety Institute SSI bundle. • SSI indicators that were being used to identify infections Provincially, Nationally and Internationally. • Set up surveillance standards based on the criteria found in this research. • Talked with Staff and Physicians.
  • 8. Where did we begin? • We picked the two high risk surgeries noted in the literature that we perform. Colorectal surgery and Caesarian Sections. • We did a 6 month retrospective data analysis of all of these surgeries from 2010 so that we could have a baseline to compare our ongoing surgical data. • We began monthly auditing of all cases in these two surgical categories.
  • 9. What did we find? • We found trends that needed work: • Inter-operative temperatures were being recorded infrequently and many of our patients were hypothermic after surgery • Rates of infection were higher in our clean (little or no bacterial contamination) surgical cases than our dirty (Moderate to High contamination ) surgical cases • We rarely gave patients prophylactic antibiotics within the hour prior to the initial cut being performed
  • 10. What did this lead us to do? • We first focused on our temperature readings • We instituted a policy that stated any surgery over 30 minutes would require an inter-operative temperature to be taken. • We provided the surgical team with esophageal temperature probes • With the data from these successes we were then able to assess that approximately 20-25 percent of our patients were hypothermic in any given quarter of the year.
  • 11. • We then looked at what we were doing to keep these patients warm • We gave warmed fluids • Covered them with warmed blankets • The temperature of the theaters is very difficult to regulate so it tends to vary through out the year depending on the external temperature • We had a warming blanket placed on the table under the patient’s back
  • 12. • None of these interventions was enough to stop 20-25% of our patient population from coming out of the theater cold • We looked at what other systems were available to help us keep the patients warm • We found that the current company whose equipment we had in the theater made a total body warming device “Bear Paws units” • We decided to trial it to see what kind of difference it would make 25 75 Hypothermic Patients Throughout the Surgical Procedure Hypothermic
  • 13. • We ran a trial on 30 clients • We used our normal temperature monitoring protocol on all of these clients • These clients could be warmed prior to surgery, while surgery occurred and post surgery
  • 14. • What we found was that 90% of clients maintained normal body temperature 36-38 degrees • Of the 10% that did not maintain normal body temperature only one client was hypothermic through out the inter-operative period • All clients (100%) prior to leaving recovery had returned to the normal body temperature range 10 90 Normothermia during the Surgical Procedure Hypothermia Normothermic
  • 15. Antibiotics within 60 minutes • We also focused in on timely antibiotic administration • This was noted to be an issue and was the focus of one of our first Mistake Proofing Projects • What was found was that we were providing antibiotic prophylaxis to our surgical patients within 60 minutes to less than 30% of our patients 30 70 Prophylactic Antibiotics Within 60 Minutes Outside 60 Minutes
  • 16. Why was this? • Well it was a combination of issues • Different standing order sets from our surgeon’s • The use of multiple antibiotics prior to surgery • No consistent method of informing the unit preparing the patient of the time patient would enter the theater
  • 17. What did we do? •We standardized order sets for Colorectal and C-Section procedures for all surgeons •We tried multiple PDSAs on the best method of communicating when patient will be entering theater •We started using surgical pause to ensure antibiotic started prior to incision
  • 18. • We did multiple sets of staff and physician education on why it was important to have the antibiotics delivered within 60 minutes • We had pharmacy research appropriate drug administration rates for the staff so that they could meet the time requirements with multiple drugs • As of Dec 2013 our rate of appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis is now 93% and we continue to look at ways to improve this number. 93 7 Propholactic Antibiotic Rate Within 60 Minutes Outside 60 Minutes
  • 19. Wound Management • Our final improvement process has been to trial alternate dressings for our C-Section patients • The reason for this is that a C-Section should never be a dirty procedure • This surgical category consistently had our highest rate of Surgical infections • The majority of these infections were superficial infections
  • 20. • Looking at the indicators for this procedure it became clear that two indicators showed up on the majority of the SSI cases • The indicators were weight above 70 KG and removal of dressing within 24 hours • As well most of these cases were discharged home within 48 hours of the procedure occurring
  • 21. • Since most of the infections occurred within 7-10 days of the procedure what could we do? • Our current practice at the time was to apply a standard dressing and generally remove it at 24 hours • This wound would then be cleaned and have a dressing spray applied • The patient would then generally be discharged home
  • 22. • A search of the current literature was done as well as discussions with other health regions around the province • What was found was that there was no set protocol for wound management within the literature let alone the province • Through the search of the literature what was found was a dressing that allowed good mobility, was waterproof and provided a physical barrier
  • 23. How could we change this process? • We could look for a dressing that stayed intact for a longer time period • One that was an active barrier to bacteria and waterproof so that it would allow the patients to have an active lifestyle once discharged • A trial of the “Aquacel” dressing was planned
  • 24. • One surgeon trialed the dressing while the other two Obstetricians decided to maintain their current practice • They provided us with wonderful groups to compare the results • In the trial group we had 15 surgeries. Out of this group we had 1 infection and this dressing we had difficulties getting proper adhesion of the dressing. • In the current practice group we had 17 surgeries and 3 infections. 1 14 Trial Patients Infections Total Cases 3 14 Current Practice Infections Total Cases
  • 25. • The difference in the rate between the two surgical groups was 62% more surgical infections for the current practice. • Since running this trial we have had a second Obstetrician and a locum Obstetrician start using this dressing. • As well we have had interest in our General Surgery program in starting to use this dressing in our abdominal cases with an open incision.
  • 26. What has been the impact of these changes? • We have had comments from patients: • “I have never before came out of surgery and been warm” • “I couldn’t even tell where my incision was as there was no redness along the spot where they cut” • “ The dressing allowed me to shower when ever I wanted to once I got home”
  • 27. • Staff comments: • “The dressings are easy to use” • “The warming device is easy to control and can be turned off once patient maintains normal temperature in the recovery period” • “I am seeing good wound bed healing in my office on follow up visits” • System improvements: • Noted reduction of C-Section infections in the quarter the dressing trial was conducted
  • 28. Cost savings for treatment of each one of those infections: • The reduction of at least one antibiotic prescription • The reduction of at least one Physician/Outpatient visit • Not needing Home Care Services providing wound care • Not incurring a readmission and/or a possible further OR procedure • 2 Dollars – 380 Dollars Per Prescription • 33.20 Dollars – 230 Dollars Per visit • 20 Dollars – 300 Dollars Per visit • 418 Dollars – 1319 Dollars Per bed day (not including treatments) • All Costs are ranges: actual cost will vary
  • 29. Sooner Safer Smarter – Patient First : • Saving to the patient: • No Extra lost work time for the patients due to an infection after surgery • No costly trips for additional health care services • No additional stress about the ongoing healing process
  • 30. Questions? Contact Me: Jason Parkvold Sunrise Health Region Clinical Improvement Facilitator jason.parkvold@shr.sk.ca www.qualitysummit.ca #QS14

Editor's Notes

  • #29: The lowest cost of possibly treating a SSI would be $35 - 40: this would be for 1 inexpensive prescription and 1 physician office visit. The other side of the scale can be in a 6 figure range (100,000 +) with readmission into an ICU with Multiple drugs and months of time to treat . The average uncomplicated superficial wound generally involves at least two visits to see a physician and at least one antibiotic. The average complicated superficial wound will require one possibly two antibiotics multiple physician visits and home care treatment. The severely complicated superficial wound will require multiple antibiotics, Home Care, possible readmission and OR intervention. Deep and Organ space wounds generally require multiple antibiotics, readmission, and OR intervention and are much more costly.