Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like495 views
The document discusses the importance of social learning technologies in corporate settings, emphasizing trust as a foundation for building relationships and facilitating collective learning. It highlights the role of networked learning and communities of practice in promoting knowledge sharing and collaboration among individuals. Case studies from Canada and the Netherlands illustrate the viability of these technologies in enhancing organizational knowledge productivity.
Yap robben networked learning may 2010 v4
- 1. Leveraging social learning technologies in corporate environmentsRobin Yap, Canada (www.robinyap.com) Joost Robben, The Netherlands(www.joostrobben.info)
- 4. Importance of trustFundamental to building relationships and learning (Harris, 2002)
- 5. Repeating factor as foundation for Social Capital "It is important to support collective learning through social learning technologies by focusing on the group dynamicsthat are needed to organize and coordinate learning" (De Laat, 2006)
- 6. Social learning technologiesWeb as social platform with services that enable people to create content, connect, and share with othersProfileConnectShare
- 8. Networked learning"Learning in which ICT is used to promote connections" (Goodyear, et al. 2004)
- 9. Networked learning Knowledge = Social
- 10. New possibilities for Social Web Technologies
- 11. Learning can take place in Networked Environments
- 12. Communities of Practice "People are increasingly sharing, discussing and negotiating knowledge through computer networks, therefore stressing the social natureof learning"(de Laat, 2006)
- 13. Social capital Connections among individuals - social networks and the norms of reciprocity and trust that arise from them. (Putnam, 2000)
- 14. Why invest in social technologies?Need for organizations to be knowledge productive (Kessels, 2000) The competitive advantage of organizations does not come from knowledge itself but from the ability to make knowledge productive(Stam, 2007)
- 16. Netherlands Testing viability of the model Interviews http://tinyurl.com/2wyn9hc
- 17. Initial Interview ResultsConnectingParticipantsTechnologyDiscussion - WikiImmediacy - OCProfile – White pagesCommunication- OutlookOffice Communicator (OC)Adobe Connect / Live Meeting WebcamsOutlook / Sharepoint Span from Low to High Affinity to technology
- 18. Corporate Roles: Individual Contributor to Management
- 20. Business Unit : 350Yammer Profile
- 21. Communication
- 22. Recommendations
- 23. Connect to everyoneYammer High Affinity to Technology
- 24. Corporate Role: : Individual Contributor to Management
- 26. Business Unit 55Insights Trust as foundational
- 27. Credibility v Competition
- 28. Outlook as primary connection still
- 29. Lurker participants now are active collaborators
- 30. Initial connection established immediately
- 31. Trust not an issue
- 32. Lurkers abound
- 34. Real life connection
- 35. DistractionQ&A
Editor's Notes
- #6: Clients trigger the conversation due to their need to incorporate “web 2.0” social technologies – this allows our clients to profile their work/business implementation of this – connect to each other and share the information
- #7: May not have the time to do this in real life so having this information online allows for immediate access and enhanced connection
- #8: ICT – information and communication technology
- #9: From big notion of networked learning – communities of practice is an example – organizing the processes.
- #10: Physical – intellectual- human - social