SlideShare a Scribd company logo
The Irony of Democracy
        15 ed.
           th



          CHAPTER 3

       ELITES IN AMERICA
 Describe the evolution of elites in
                        the U.S.
Learning Objectives
                       Explain the New Deal and
                        progressive Eras as elite self-
                        interest.
                       Identify important types of
                        organization in which national elites
                        are found.
                       Differentiate governmental and
                        private sector elites.
                       Explain the expanding role of
                        government and governmental
                        elites.
The Evolution of U.S. Elites
The Evolution of U.S. Elites

 Elite membership has evolved slowly.
    Industrialization, technology, other new sources of wealth have
     produced new elites who have been absorbed into the system.

 Political conflict has centered on a narrow range of
 issues.
    The Civil War was the only time elites were deeply divided
     over the nature of U.S. society.
Early Elite Consensus:
Hamilton’s Financial Vision
Hamilton’s Financial Vision

 President George Washington’s Secretary of the
 Treasury favored a strong national government as a
 means of protecting property and stimulating economic
 and industrial growth.
    Paid off the Revolutionary War debts (government bonds) at face
     value – providing a significant profit to investors, created a pool of
     capital available for investment in industrialization of the U.S.
    Established a Bank of the United States.

 Created conflict between merchants and bankers who
 benefited from Hamilton’s policies and plantation owners
 and slaveholders who did not.
Early Elite Consensus

 The first transfer of power, where the “out” party
  peacefully replaced the “in” party illustrated the strength
  of the consensus among elites.
 In the 1800 elections, the Federalists were defeated and
  Thomas Jefferson won the presidency.
     Allowed the plantation owners and other landed interests to gain
      power.
     Majority of Americans earned their living from the land, elites
      mobilized the masses.

 The Democratic-Republicans made few changes to
  Hamilton’s policies, ultimately adopted them.
The Rise of the West
The Rise of the West

 Western settlers were mainly middle and lower class
 immigrants.
    Hard work resulted in rapid upward social mobility and creation of
     new elites.
    Ideal of individualism, self-creation, wealth and power won by
     competitive skill demands a more open elite system, greater
     opportunity to acquire wealth and influence.

 Andrew Jackson’s presidential victory in 1828 was one of
 new western elites.
    Jacksonian’s became advocates of the principle that all (white) men
     should have the right to vote and hold public office.
The Rise of the West
Elite Cleavage: The Civil War

      CLEAVAGE, VIOLENCE, AND SECESSION

            LINCOLN AND SLAVERY
Elite Cleavage

 Southern elites could not profitably produce cotton
 without slave labor.
    Cotton accounted for more than half of the value of all U.S.
     goods shipped abroad before the Civil War.
    Wanted to expand cotton industry in the West.
 Northern elites had no direct interest in abolishing
 slavery in the South, yet opposed slavery in the
 West.
    Wanted small farmers who produced food and raw goods for
     the commercial and industrial east.
Cleavage, Violence, and Secession

 Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) – Supreme Court decided
 that Congress had no authority to forbid slavery in any
 territory - the Constitution protected slave property.
 In the 1860 presidential elections, Lincoln and the
 Republican Party won the Electoral College.
     Many Southern leaders announced they would not accept the
      outcome if Lincoln won.
     December 20, 1860, South Carolina seceded from the Union,
      followed by ten other states in the next six months.
     Southern Confederate forces attacked the Fort Sumter U.S. military
      base in April 1861, beginning the Civil War.
Lincoln and Slavery

 Exclusive concern was halting slavery in the West.
    Wanted to tie western territories to the northern system.

 Lincoln’s goal was to bring the South back to the
 Union, restore orderly government, and establish
 that the states cannot resist national authority with
 force.
 The Emancipation Proclamation was a political and
 military tactic to preserve the union and make
 foreign intervention in the Civil War less likely.
Rise of the New Industrial Elite
Industrial Elite

 Transformation from agricultural to industrial reached
 climax after the Civil War.
    Homestead Act of 1862
    Transcontinental Railroad Act of 1862
    Rise of corporations and stock markets
    Introduction of machinery in factories
    Southern planters were removed from the national scene

 Business became increasingly competitive, little
 companies disappeared, production rose and resulted in
 the emergence of monopolies.
Reform as Elite Self-Interest: The
Progressive Era to the New Deal

                PROGRESSIVE ERA

      THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND THE NEW DEAL

                NOBLESSE OBLIGE
Reform as Elite Self-Interest

 First generation of U.S. capitalists had little sense of
 public responsibility.
    Their success arose from natural selection, survival of the
     fittest – social Darwinist ideas.

 Mass discontent resulted in radical movements such
 as anarchism and socialism.
    1901 assassination of President William McKinley was a
     catalyst for elites to adjust the system.
Progressive Era

 Industrialization and urbanization rose to a peak in
 late 1800’s.
    Brought about social disruption and vast numbers of masses
     were left out of the economic boom.

 Elites in the U.S. witnessed similar events abroad,
 took action to pre-empt agitation and anger aimed at
 elites.
    Implemented a variety of laws and regulations (Fig 3-1)
Progressive Era

 President’s Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson
 criticized elites for lack of public responsibility.
    Urged elites to value welfare of the masses as an aspect of its own
     welfare.
    Programs aimed to preserve competition, individualism, enterprise,
     and opportunity.
        Wilson’s Federal Trade Commission
        Federal Reserve Act
        Roosevelt broke up a number of monopolies
    Government regulation required to see that elites function in the
     public interest.
Progressive Era
The Great Depression and the New Deal

 Following the stock market crash of October 1929,
 the U.S. economy virtually came to a halt.
    By 1932, one out of four persons in the U.S. was unemployed,
     one out of five was on welfare.
 President Herbert Hoover intervened with the
 Emergency Relief and Construction Act’s public
 works programs, created the Reconstruction
 Finance Corporation to back loans.
    Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act worsened the economy and made
     Hoover appear ineffective.
The New Deal

 President Franklin D. Roosevelt elected in 1932
    Nation’s elites agreed that reform and regard for the public
     welfare were essential to maintaining the political system.
    New Deal reformed the existing capitalist system.
        A series of improvisations aimed at making government act
         humanely and compassionately toward those suffering hardship.
        Transferred significant amounts of power from private sector to
         government.
            Minimize the ups and downs of the business cycle, protect the
             masses.
Noblesse Oblige

    Philosophy of elite responsibility for the welfare of the masses.

 FDR came from two of the oldest elite families in the
 U.S.
    Personal philosophy became the prevailing one of the new
     liberal establishment.
    Generated a belief among the masses that the elites had their
     best interests at heart.
The Growth of Government:
The New Deal to the Cold War

          GLOBALIZATION
The Growth of Government

 Following WWII, federal spending settled at 18-20%
 of the economy, lasted through 2008.
 As money flowed to the federal government, power
 also moved from the private sector to the public.
    An elite class of government, military, business, and political
     leaders were running the nation to their mutual benefit.
 No clear line of division between government and
 business enterprise.
    Goals of government and corporate management have largely
     blurred together.
The Growth of Government
The Growth of Government

 1960’s expansion of the role of government through
 social welfare programs and increased regulation of
 the economy.
    President Bill Clinton reduced the size and cost of
     government.
    President George W. Bush provided higher levels of spending
     and programming.
    Size of government hit record high in President Barack
     Obama’s first year – purchased 2 automobile companies and
     taking over failing banks, though the process began under the
     Bush administration.
Globalization

 The United States is now a large player in a global
 economy.
    Globalization’s affect on the power of elites is discussed in
     Chapter 14.
Finding the Elites in the United
            States
Finding the Elites in the United States

 Elites hold positions of power; two overlapping
 categories – political and economic.
    Most elites can be found in government
        Congress, presidency, bureaucracy, state and local government

    Others are non-governmental
        Media, political parties, interest groups
Economic Elites in the United
          States
        INDUSTRIAL CONCENTRATION

         FINANCIAL CONCENTRATION

            CORPORATE ELITES

           MANAGEMENT POWER

        INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES
Economic Elites

 The people who hold positions of power in the small
 number of large corporations and banks.
    Generally held to high levels of accountability.

 Pluralism views business interest as just another
 interest group, competing with all other interest
 groups.
 Elitism views economic elites as distinctly powerful
 in shaping government policy and making decisions
 that directly influence our lives.
Industrial Concentration

 Economic enterprise has consolidated into a small
 number of giant corporations.
    The 500 largest U.S. corporations collectively take in about
     $10.6 trillion in revenues every year.
Industrial Concentration
Financial Concentration

 The nation’s 10 largest commercial banks control
 nearly half of all banking assets.
    The financial crisis which began in 2007 resulted in partial
     government ownership of Citigroup and Ally Bank.
    Recent banking mergers have resulted in greater
     concentration.

 Insurance companies and investment firms have
 immense power in the U.S. economy as well.
Financial Concentration
Corporate Elites

 Through the 1930’s, the nation’s largest corporations
 were controlled by the tycoons who’d created them.
 By the 1930’s, control of most had passed to
 professional managers.
    Theory of “managerialism” – general management skills are
     more important than detailed production-specific knowledge –
     became the conventional wisdom about corporate
     governance.
Corporate Elites
Management Power

 Corporate power rests in the hands of the top
 managers of the nation’s large industrial
 corporations and financial institutions.
    Theoretically, stockholders have ultimate power over
     management, but really have little control over the actions of
     the corporations.
        Most sign over “proxies” so top management can cast votes for
         them at annual meetings of stockholders.

 Formal division of power in a corporation is between
 the board of directors and the company executives.
Management Power
Management Power
Interlocking Directorates

 A director of one corporation also sits on the boards
 of one or more other corporations.
    Further concentrates power
Government and Corporate
 Elites: Revolving Doors
Revolving Doors

 Politicians may know how to run for office, but may not
 know how to run the government – some turn to
 experienced executive elites to staff key positions in their
 administrations.
 Elitist model expects a “revolving” door, elites move from
 power positions in banking, industry, law, etc. to power
 positions in government and back again.
     An exception are the members of President Obama’s cabinet, nearly
      all of whom are career politicians (former governors, senators, etc.)
     Executives from Goldman Sacs have held numerous key
      government positions.
Revolving Doors
Elite Policymaking Institutions
       PUBLIC POLICY AS ELITE PREFERENCE

       THE FOUNDATIONS AND UNIVERSITIES

               THE THINK TANKS

                  THE MEDIA

           THE WASHINGTON INSIDERS
Elite Policymaking Institutions

 U.S. elite are also found in foundations, policy-planning
  organizations or think-tanks, mass media, and universities.
     These are a kind of “third force” in U.S. society.
 Most influential institutions include the Ford Foundation,
  Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Corporation, Brookings
  Institute, the RAND corporation, American Enterprise Institute,
  Cato Institute, etc. – called the Establishment.
 Elites communicate with the masses and each other through
  Washington Post, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, etc.
     President Obama’s chief economic advisor had previously been with the
      U.S. Treasury Department, D.E. Shaw Group, and Harvard University
      (as president).
Public Policy as Elite Preference

 Pluralist model of the policy process views policy as the
  product of competition, bargaining, and compromise among
  many diverse groups.
     Interest groups viewed as principle actors.
 Elitist model views public policy as determined by a relatively
  small group of like-minded individuals, reflecting their own
  values and preferences.
     Initial resources for research, study, planning, etc. comes from corporate
      and personal wealth which is channeled into foundations, universities,
      policy-planning groups.
     Corporate presidents and directors, top wealth holders also sit on the
      governing boards of foundations, universities, and policy-planning
      groups to oversee the spending of their funds.
The Foundations and Universities

 Foundations provide a link between wealth and the
 intellectual community.
 Universities must respond to the policy interests of
 foundations.
    University intellectuals working independently occasionally
     have impact on policymaking, though intellectuals on the
     whole respond to policy direction set by foundations,
     corporations, government agencies
The Foundations and Universities
The Think Tanks

 Policy-planning groups are central coordinating
 points in policymaking process.
    Review relevant university and foundation-supported research
     with the goal of developing policy recommendations.
    At the same time, endeavor to build consensus among
     corporate, media, financial, civic, intellectual, and government
     leaders.

 Of the most cited think tanks, 47% are centrist, 37%
 are conservative, and 16% are progressive (left of
 center)
The Media

 Play a vital role in preparing public opinion for policy
 change.
    Media define the “problem” as a problem, setting the agenda
     for policy making.
    Encourage politicians to assume new policy stances by
     allocating valuable network airtime to those who speak out
     about new policy directions.
The Washington Insiders

 White House staff, congressional committee staffs,
 top executive administrators maintain close contact
 with policy-planning groups.
    These groups often help prepare legislation.
Power in the United States: An
    Elitist Interpretation
Power in the United States

 Power is organized into large organizations, private
 and public:
    Banks and financial institutions
    Corporations
    Universities
    Law firms
    Religious institutions
    Military and government bureaucracies
U.S. Political Economic History:
     An Elitist Interpretation
U.S. Political Economic History

 Movement of nonelites into elite positions must be
 slow and continuous in order to maintain stability.
 Potential elite members must demonstrate
 commitment to basic elite consensus.
 Changes in public policy must be incremental rather
 than revolutionary.

More Related Content

PPT
Comparative politics
PPT
As voting behaviour
PPTX
C5 - Political Culture
PPTX
Politics of Turkey
PPTX
Karl Marx and His Political Philosophy
PDF
The Political System of the Republic of Turkey, Past and Present
PPT
Dictatorship
PPT
Liberalism
Comparative politics
As voting behaviour
C5 - Political Culture
Politics of Turkey
Karl Marx and His Political Philosophy
The Political System of the Republic of Turkey, Past and Present
Dictatorship
Liberalism

What's hot (20)

PPTX
PPTX
Us-China relations
PPTX
Liberalism
PPT
Aristotle and the Politics
PPTX
Religion and politics
PPTX
PLATO's political thought on Justice
PPT
Electoral systems overview
PPT
international relation
PDF
Russia : Comparative Political Systems
PPTX
Political system of germany
PPT
Topic 2 - Plato
PPTX
Politics of China
PDF
David eastons system theory
PPTX
Political representation and democracy
PPTX
Westphalia
PPTX
Capitalism,socialism and communism.pptx
PDF
End of the history and the last man
PPTX
Vietnam (Political Setting)
PPT
Political Thought
PPTX
REASONS OF UNSTABLE DEMOCRATIC SETUP IN PAKISTAN
Us-China relations
Liberalism
Aristotle and the Politics
Religion and politics
PLATO's political thought on Justice
Electoral systems overview
international relation
Russia : Comparative Political Systems
Political system of germany
Topic 2 - Plato
Politics of China
David eastons system theory
Political representation and democracy
Westphalia
Capitalism,socialism and communism.pptx
End of the history and the last man
Vietnam (Political Setting)
Political Thought
REASONS OF UNSTABLE DEMOCRATIC SETUP IN PAKISTAN
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

ODP
Modern latin america
PPT
China Market Reform
PPTX
Presentation 5
PPTX
Latin america after independence
PPT
Lectures 8 and 9
PPT
History of latin america
PPTX
class4lasp296
PPT
Chapter 3 CPO2002 Lecture
PPT
Democracy and Legitmacy - Law & Politics
PDF
Administrative Reform
PDF
Bureaucratic Reform Road Map
PPTX
Neocolonialism
PPT
PPTX
Social darwinism
PPTX
Administrative theory as political theory
PDF
C2 power, legitimacy, authority
PPS
The Real Iran
PPTX
Iran powerpoint
Modern latin america
China Market Reform
Presentation 5
Latin america after independence
Lectures 8 and 9
History of latin america
class4lasp296
Chapter 3 CPO2002 Lecture
Democracy and Legitmacy - Law & Politics
Administrative Reform
Bureaucratic Reform Road Map
Neocolonialism
Social darwinism
Administrative theory as political theory
C2 power, legitimacy, authority
The Real Iran
Iran powerpoint
Ad

Similar to Chapter3 powerpoint (13)

PPTX
Progressive Era about America's land grab
PDF
Essay On New Deal
PPTX
Comparative History
PDF
Political Science 5 – Western Political Thought - Power Point #3
PPTX
Political parties
PDF
Tabakian Pols 5 PP3 Fall 2014
PDF
Will The U.S. Split Into One or More Countries?
PPT
Progressive era powerpoint
PDF
Political Science 7 – International Relations - Power Point #12
DOCX
Running head AMERICAN HISTORY .docx
PPTX
Points of conflict
PPT
American studies 2016 03
DOCX
Franklin Roosevelt and the New Deal Compared to Obamacare
Progressive Era about America's land grab
Essay On New Deal
Comparative History
Political Science 5 – Western Political Thought - Power Point #3
Political parties
Tabakian Pols 5 PP3 Fall 2014
Will The U.S. Split Into One or More Countries?
Progressive era powerpoint
Political Science 7 – International Relations - Power Point #12
Running head AMERICAN HISTORY .docx
Points of conflict
American studies 2016 03
Franklin Roosevelt and the New Deal Compared to Obamacare

More from stanbridge (20)

PPTX
Micro Lab 3 Lecture
PPTX
Creating a poster v2
PPTX
Creating a poster
PPTX
Sample poster
PPTX
OT 5018 Thesis Dissemination
PPTX
Ot5101 005 week 5
PPTX
Ot5101 005 week4
PPTX
Compliance, motivation, and health behaviors
PPTX
Ch 5 developmental stages of the learner
PPTX
OT 5101 week2 theory policy
PPTX
OT 5101 week3 planning needs assessment
PPTX
Ot5101 week1
PPT
NUR 304 Chapter005
PPT
NUR 3043 Chapter007
PPT
NUR 3043 Chapter006
PPT
NUR 3043 Chapter004
PPT
3043 Chapter009
PPT
3043 Chapter008
PPT
Melnyk ppt chapter_21
PPT
Melnyk ppt chapter_22
Micro Lab 3 Lecture
Creating a poster v2
Creating a poster
Sample poster
OT 5018 Thesis Dissemination
Ot5101 005 week 5
Ot5101 005 week4
Compliance, motivation, and health behaviors
Ch 5 developmental stages of the learner
OT 5101 week2 theory policy
OT 5101 week3 planning needs assessment
Ot5101 week1
NUR 304 Chapter005
NUR 3043 Chapter007
NUR 3043 Chapter006
NUR 3043 Chapter004
3043 Chapter009
3043 Chapter008
Melnyk ppt chapter_21
Melnyk ppt chapter_22

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Reviving Regional Truths: AI-Powered Journalism in Bangladesh
PPTX
The Changing World Order-From G7 Dominance to BRICS Emergence.pptx
PDF
4th-president-of-the-Philippines-_20250 812_103637_0000.pdf
PDF
Opher Bryer-The Rise and Fall of Opher Bryer How an AI Startup Turned from Pr...
PDF
18082025_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
PPTX
INTRODUCTION TO WORLD RELIGION WEEK 1 Quarter 1
PDF
Naya Bharat Vision 2047_ Key Takeaways from This Year’s Independence Day Them...
PPTX
Thailand Crowned Asia’s Most Culturally Influential Country in 2025 by U.S. N...
PPTX
Beige and Black Vintage Floral Border Project Presentation_20250818_091954_00...
PPTX
Rhythms of Freedom_ India Day Shines at Battery Dance Festival 2025.
PDF
4th-president-of-the-Philippines-_20250 812_103637_0000.pdf
PDF
How India’s First AI-Powered Anganwadi in Nagpur is Changing Education – As F...
PDF
History ppt on World War 2 and its consequences
PDF
Human Appeal in Gaza – Emergency Aid, Healthcare & Hope for Families.pdf
DOCX
Memecoin memecoinist news site for trends and insights
PDF
Naidu Pushes for Rs 36 Crore Subsidy to Support Farmers in Need
PPTX
Elias Salame Uses Fake Trades to Make Real Money Disappear.pptx
DOC
BU毕业证学历认证,阿什兰大学毕业证文凭证书
PDF
9th-President-of-the-Philippines_lecture .pdf
PDF
Pancasila & Citizen Resume PPT - Guest lecture
Reviving Regional Truths: AI-Powered Journalism in Bangladesh
The Changing World Order-From G7 Dominance to BRICS Emergence.pptx
4th-president-of-the-Philippines-_20250 812_103637_0000.pdf
Opher Bryer-The Rise and Fall of Opher Bryer How an AI Startup Turned from Pr...
18082025_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
INTRODUCTION TO WORLD RELIGION WEEK 1 Quarter 1
Naya Bharat Vision 2047_ Key Takeaways from This Year’s Independence Day Them...
Thailand Crowned Asia’s Most Culturally Influential Country in 2025 by U.S. N...
Beige and Black Vintage Floral Border Project Presentation_20250818_091954_00...
Rhythms of Freedom_ India Day Shines at Battery Dance Festival 2025.
4th-president-of-the-Philippines-_20250 812_103637_0000.pdf
How India’s First AI-Powered Anganwadi in Nagpur is Changing Education – As F...
History ppt on World War 2 and its consequences
Human Appeal in Gaza – Emergency Aid, Healthcare & Hope for Families.pdf
Memecoin memecoinist news site for trends and insights
Naidu Pushes for Rs 36 Crore Subsidy to Support Farmers in Need
Elias Salame Uses Fake Trades to Make Real Money Disappear.pptx
BU毕业证学历认证,阿什兰大学毕业证文凭证书
9th-President-of-the-Philippines_lecture .pdf
Pancasila & Citizen Resume PPT - Guest lecture

Chapter3 powerpoint

  • 1. The Irony of Democracy 15 ed. th CHAPTER 3 ELITES IN AMERICA
  • 2.  Describe the evolution of elites in the U.S. Learning Objectives  Explain the New Deal and progressive Eras as elite self- interest.  Identify important types of organization in which national elites are found.  Differentiate governmental and private sector elites.  Explain the expanding role of government and governmental elites.
  • 3. The Evolution of U.S. Elites
  • 4. The Evolution of U.S. Elites  Elite membership has evolved slowly.  Industrialization, technology, other new sources of wealth have produced new elites who have been absorbed into the system.  Political conflict has centered on a narrow range of issues.  The Civil War was the only time elites were deeply divided over the nature of U.S. society.
  • 6. Hamilton’s Financial Vision  President George Washington’s Secretary of the Treasury favored a strong national government as a means of protecting property and stimulating economic and industrial growth.  Paid off the Revolutionary War debts (government bonds) at face value – providing a significant profit to investors, created a pool of capital available for investment in industrialization of the U.S.  Established a Bank of the United States.  Created conflict between merchants and bankers who benefited from Hamilton’s policies and plantation owners and slaveholders who did not.
  • 7. Early Elite Consensus  The first transfer of power, where the “out” party peacefully replaced the “in” party illustrated the strength of the consensus among elites.  In the 1800 elections, the Federalists were defeated and Thomas Jefferson won the presidency.  Allowed the plantation owners and other landed interests to gain power.  Majority of Americans earned their living from the land, elites mobilized the masses.  The Democratic-Republicans made few changes to Hamilton’s policies, ultimately adopted them.
  • 8. The Rise of the West
  • 9. The Rise of the West  Western settlers were mainly middle and lower class immigrants.  Hard work resulted in rapid upward social mobility and creation of new elites.  Ideal of individualism, self-creation, wealth and power won by competitive skill demands a more open elite system, greater opportunity to acquire wealth and influence.  Andrew Jackson’s presidential victory in 1828 was one of new western elites.  Jacksonian’s became advocates of the principle that all (white) men should have the right to vote and hold public office.
  • 10. The Rise of the West
  • 11. Elite Cleavage: The Civil War CLEAVAGE, VIOLENCE, AND SECESSION LINCOLN AND SLAVERY
  • 12. Elite Cleavage  Southern elites could not profitably produce cotton without slave labor.  Cotton accounted for more than half of the value of all U.S. goods shipped abroad before the Civil War.  Wanted to expand cotton industry in the West.  Northern elites had no direct interest in abolishing slavery in the South, yet opposed slavery in the West.  Wanted small farmers who produced food and raw goods for the commercial and industrial east.
  • 13. Cleavage, Violence, and Secession  Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) – Supreme Court decided that Congress had no authority to forbid slavery in any territory - the Constitution protected slave property.  In the 1860 presidential elections, Lincoln and the Republican Party won the Electoral College.  Many Southern leaders announced they would not accept the outcome if Lincoln won.  December 20, 1860, South Carolina seceded from the Union, followed by ten other states in the next six months.  Southern Confederate forces attacked the Fort Sumter U.S. military base in April 1861, beginning the Civil War.
  • 14. Lincoln and Slavery  Exclusive concern was halting slavery in the West.  Wanted to tie western territories to the northern system.  Lincoln’s goal was to bring the South back to the Union, restore orderly government, and establish that the states cannot resist national authority with force.  The Emancipation Proclamation was a political and military tactic to preserve the union and make foreign intervention in the Civil War less likely.
  • 15. Rise of the New Industrial Elite
  • 16. Industrial Elite  Transformation from agricultural to industrial reached climax after the Civil War.  Homestead Act of 1862  Transcontinental Railroad Act of 1862  Rise of corporations and stock markets  Introduction of machinery in factories  Southern planters were removed from the national scene  Business became increasingly competitive, little companies disappeared, production rose and resulted in the emergence of monopolies.
  • 17. Reform as Elite Self-Interest: The Progressive Era to the New Deal PROGRESSIVE ERA THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND THE NEW DEAL NOBLESSE OBLIGE
  • 18. Reform as Elite Self-Interest  First generation of U.S. capitalists had little sense of public responsibility.  Their success arose from natural selection, survival of the fittest – social Darwinist ideas.  Mass discontent resulted in radical movements such as anarchism and socialism.  1901 assassination of President William McKinley was a catalyst for elites to adjust the system.
  • 19. Progressive Era  Industrialization and urbanization rose to a peak in late 1800’s.  Brought about social disruption and vast numbers of masses were left out of the economic boom.  Elites in the U.S. witnessed similar events abroad, took action to pre-empt agitation and anger aimed at elites.  Implemented a variety of laws and regulations (Fig 3-1)
  • 20. Progressive Era  President’s Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson criticized elites for lack of public responsibility.  Urged elites to value welfare of the masses as an aspect of its own welfare.  Programs aimed to preserve competition, individualism, enterprise, and opportunity.  Wilson’s Federal Trade Commission  Federal Reserve Act  Roosevelt broke up a number of monopolies  Government regulation required to see that elites function in the public interest.
  • 22. The Great Depression and the New Deal  Following the stock market crash of October 1929, the U.S. economy virtually came to a halt.  By 1932, one out of four persons in the U.S. was unemployed, one out of five was on welfare.  President Herbert Hoover intervened with the Emergency Relief and Construction Act’s public works programs, created the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to back loans.  Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act worsened the economy and made Hoover appear ineffective.
  • 23. The New Deal  President Franklin D. Roosevelt elected in 1932  Nation’s elites agreed that reform and regard for the public welfare were essential to maintaining the political system.  New Deal reformed the existing capitalist system.  A series of improvisations aimed at making government act humanely and compassionately toward those suffering hardship.  Transferred significant amounts of power from private sector to government.  Minimize the ups and downs of the business cycle, protect the masses.
  • 24. Noblesse Oblige  Philosophy of elite responsibility for the welfare of the masses.  FDR came from two of the oldest elite families in the U.S.  Personal philosophy became the prevailing one of the new liberal establishment.  Generated a belief among the masses that the elites had their best interests at heart.
  • 25. The Growth of Government: The New Deal to the Cold War GLOBALIZATION
  • 26. The Growth of Government  Following WWII, federal spending settled at 18-20% of the economy, lasted through 2008.  As money flowed to the federal government, power also moved from the private sector to the public.  An elite class of government, military, business, and political leaders were running the nation to their mutual benefit.  No clear line of division between government and business enterprise.  Goals of government and corporate management have largely blurred together.
  • 27. The Growth of Government
  • 28. The Growth of Government  1960’s expansion of the role of government through social welfare programs and increased regulation of the economy.  President Bill Clinton reduced the size and cost of government.  President George W. Bush provided higher levels of spending and programming.  Size of government hit record high in President Barack Obama’s first year – purchased 2 automobile companies and taking over failing banks, though the process began under the Bush administration.
  • 29. Globalization  The United States is now a large player in a global economy.  Globalization’s affect on the power of elites is discussed in Chapter 14.
  • 30. Finding the Elites in the United States
  • 31. Finding the Elites in the United States  Elites hold positions of power; two overlapping categories – political and economic.  Most elites can be found in government  Congress, presidency, bureaucracy, state and local government  Others are non-governmental  Media, political parties, interest groups
  • 32. Economic Elites in the United States INDUSTRIAL CONCENTRATION FINANCIAL CONCENTRATION CORPORATE ELITES MANAGEMENT POWER INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES
  • 33. Economic Elites  The people who hold positions of power in the small number of large corporations and banks.  Generally held to high levels of accountability.  Pluralism views business interest as just another interest group, competing with all other interest groups.  Elitism views economic elites as distinctly powerful in shaping government policy and making decisions that directly influence our lives.
  • 34. Industrial Concentration  Economic enterprise has consolidated into a small number of giant corporations.  The 500 largest U.S. corporations collectively take in about $10.6 trillion in revenues every year.
  • 36. Financial Concentration  The nation’s 10 largest commercial banks control nearly half of all banking assets.  The financial crisis which began in 2007 resulted in partial government ownership of Citigroup and Ally Bank.  Recent banking mergers have resulted in greater concentration.  Insurance companies and investment firms have immense power in the U.S. economy as well.
  • 38. Corporate Elites  Through the 1930’s, the nation’s largest corporations were controlled by the tycoons who’d created them.  By the 1930’s, control of most had passed to professional managers.  Theory of “managerialism” – general management skills are more important than detailed production-specific knowledge – became the conventional wisdom about corporate governance.
  • 40. Management Power  Corporate power rests in the hands of the top managers of the nation’s large industrial corporations and financial institutions.  Theoretically, stockholders have ultimate power over management, but really have little control over the actions of the corporations.  Most sign over “proxies” so top management can cast votes for them at annual meetings of stockholders.  Formal division of power in a corporation is between the board of directors and the company executives.
  • 43. Interlocking Directorates  A director of one corporation also sits on the boards of one or more other corporations.  Further concentrates power
  • 44. Government and Corporate Elites: Revolving Doors
  • 45. Revolving Doors  Politicians may know how to run for office, but may not know how to run the government – some turn to experienced executive elites to staff key positions in their administrations.  Elitist model expects a “revolving” door, elites move from power positions in banking, industry, law, etc. to power positions in government and back again.  An exception are the members of President Obama’s cabinet, nearly all of whom are career politicians (former governors, senators, etc.)  Executives from Goldman Sacs have held numerous key government positions.
  • 47. Elite Policymaking Institutions PUBLIC POLICY AS ELITE PREFERENCE THE FOUNDATIONS AND UNIVERSITIES THE THINK TANKS THE MEDIA THE WASHINGTON INSIDERS
  • 48. Elite Policymaking Institutions  U.S. elite are also found in foundations, policy-planning organizations or think-tanks, mass media, and universities.  These are a kind of “third force” in U.S. society.  Most influential institutions include the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Corporation, Brookings Institute, the RAND corporation, American Enterprise Institute, Cato Institute, etc. – called the Establishment.  Elites communicate with the masses and each other through Washington Post, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, etc.  President Obama’s chief economic advisor had previously been with the U.S. Treasury Department, D.E. Shaw Group, and Harvard University (as president).
  • 49. Public Policy as Elite Preference  Pluralist model of the policy process views policy as the product of competition, bargaining, and compromise among many diverse groups.  Interest groups viewed as principle actors.  Elitist model views public policy as determined by a relatively small group of like-minded individuals, reflecting their own values and preferences.  Initial resources for research, study, planning, etc. comes from corporate and personal wealth which is channeled into foundations, universities, policy-planning groups.  Corporate presidents and directors, top wealth holders also sit on the governing boards of foundations, universities, and policy-planning groups to oversee the spending of their funds.
  • 50. The Foundations and Universities  Foundations provide a link between wealth and the intellectual community.  Universities must respond to the policy interests of foundations.  University intellectuals working independently occasionally have impact on policymaking, though intellectuals on the whole respond to policy direction set by foundations, corporations, government agencies
  • 51. The Foundations and Universities
  • 52. The Think Tanks  Policy-planning groups are central coordinating points in policymaking process.  Review relevant university and foundation-supported research with the goal of developing policy recommendations.  At the same time, endeavor to build consensus among corporate, media, financial, civic, intellectual, and government leaders.  Of the most cited think tanks, 47% are centrist, 37% are conservative, and 16% are progressive (left of center)
  • 53. The Media  Play a vital role in preparing public opinion for policy change.  Media define the “problem” as a problem, setting the agenda for policy making.  Encourage politicians to assume new policy stances by allocating valuable network airtime to those who speak out about new policy directions.
  • 54. The Washington Insiders  White House staff, congressional committee staffs, top executive administrators maintain close contact with policy-planning groups.  These groups often help prepare legislation.
  • 55. Power in the United States: An Elitist Interpretation
  • 56. Power in the United States  Power is organized into large organizations, private and public:  Banks and financial institutions  Corporations  Universities  Law firms  Religious institutions  Military and government bureaucracies
  • 57. U.S. Political Economic History: An Elitist Interpretation
  • 58. U.S. Political Economic History  Movement of nonelites into elite positions must be slow and continuous in order to maintain stability.  Potential elite members must demonstrate commitment to basic elite consensus.  Changes in public policy must be incremental rather than revolutionary.

Editor's Notes

  • #17: Monopolies are anti-competitive and violate a core elite consensus of free competition in a free marketplace.