The benefits of using building information modeling in structural engineering

)) .10# )+ + ,0#. #-,.0/ .10# 01'#/

,)),3 0'/ + '0',+) 3,.(/ 0 8-/ '%'0)!,**,+/ 1/1 #1 %..#-,.0/
.0 ,$ 0# '2') + +2'.,+*#+0) +%'+##.'+% ,**,+/
6'/ 6#/'/ '/ .,1%0 0, 4,1 $,. $.## + ,-#+ !!#// 4 0# .10#
01'#/ 0 '%'0),**,+/ 0 / ##+ !!#-0# $,. '+!)1/',+ '+ ))
.10# )+ + ,0#. #-,.0/ 4 + 10,.'5# *'+'/0.0,. ,$
'%'0),**,+/ ,. *,.# '+$,.*0',+ -)#/# !,+0!0
.# #!! +#)/,+1/1 #1
#!,**#+# '00',+
1+0 #/. 1%1/0, 6# #+#70/ ,$ /'+% 1')'+% +$,.*0',+ ,#)'+% '+ 0.1!01.) +%'+##.'+%

8-/ '%'0)!,**,+/ 1/1 #1 %..#-,.0/

THE BENEFITS OF USING BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING
IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
by
Cesar Augusto Hunt De Leon
A report summited in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree
of
MASTER OF SCIENCE
in
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Approved by:
______________________
Dr. Marvin Halling
Major Professor
______________________
Dr. Paul Barr
Committee Member
______________________
Dr. James Bay
Committee Member
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY
Logan, Utah
2013

ii
ABSTRACT
This paper explores how the use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) can be a
beneficial platform for structural engineers. The current state of BIM is analyzed, giving
a general overview on how architectural; engineering and construction firms are applying
it on their projects. The applicability of BIM to structural engineering is discussed, and
how it impacts the structural design and its workflow. The benefits of using BIM in
structural engineering are then analyzed, in the areas of productivity, coordination, and
visualization, and a case study is developed to test the interoperability between BIM
software and structural analysis software. The findings of this study provide useful
information for everyone interested in increasing their knowledge on BIM technology in
structural engineering.
(42 pages)

iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank everyone that in one way or the other made this project
possible. I would like to thank my advisor and major professor, Dr. Marvin Halling for
giving me the opportunity to do research and for guiding me through the culmination of
my master’s degree. I am thankful for the members of my committee, Dr. Paul Barr and
Dr. James Bay for their support and guidance on this project.
Thanks to my family, especially my parents, Cesar and Janet, for their
unconditional love and continuous support even throughout the distance. There is no
doubt that I would not be the man I am today if it was not because of them.
I would like to thank all the wonderful friends that I have made here at Utah State
University. All of them, especially Marcelle, Rafael and Wilhem, have been an incredible
support these last couple years, and they have earned a good spot in my heart.
Cesar Hunt

iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................................... ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................. iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................ iv
LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................... v
CHAPTER I.....................................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................1
CHAPTER II....................................................................................................................................3
LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................3
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING ...........................................................................3
BIM IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING..............................................................................8
BENEFITS.............................................................................................................................16
CHAPTER III ................................................................................................................................24
CASE STUDY...........................................................................................................................24
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................31
REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................................34

v
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Level of BIM implementation for infrastructure over time................................. 5
Figure 2. User profile: Engineers by discipline .................................................................. 6
Figure 3. 2013 Implementation of BIM for Infrastructure. ................................................ 9
Figure 4. BIM Implementation on Infrastructure by Project Type................................... 13
Figure 5. Value of BIM for Infrastructure by Project Phase............................................. 17
Figure 6. Top Internal Benefits of Using BIM for Infrastructure Projects ....................... 18
Figure 7. Most Important Infrastructure Project Factors that Add Value to BIM Use..... 20
Figure 8. Most Important Benefits that Contribute Value to Infrastructure Projects ....... 21
Figure 9. The Exchange File tool for Revit and RISA. .................................................... 26
Figure 10. The render view of the frame in Revit Structure............................................. 27
Figure 11. The render view of the frame in RISA 3D. ..................................................... 28
Figure 12. The frame after the structural design in RISA 3D........................................... 29
Figure 13. The frame after it was exported back to Revit Structure................................. 30

1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
The use of new methods and software is one of the most important tools that
structural engineers are using nowadays to stay competitive (Autodesk, 2012). Engineers
are constantly looking for new ways to improve and keep the pace on today’s economy,
meeting critical points in work like productivity, coordination and problem solving.
Building information modeling (BIM) can potentially help with these important aspects.
The core feature that BIM offers is the ability to integrate intelligent objects in the model.
These intelligent objects contain all the data regarding a specific component, from
geometric characteristics to the way they interact with other components, making the
entire model full of information.
The use of models is not a new trend. Big companies like Toyota have been using
them for quite some time to support their manufactory and complex engineering
processes, especially in the design and documentation phase (Autodesk, 2011). Applying
this same principle to infrastructures and building projects in the architecture, engineering
and construction industry is what has developed in what we know as BIM.
The environment that BIM adoption is creating is similar to when other
technologies, like computer aided design (CAD), where adopted in the industry in the
past 50 years. (McCuen, Suermann, Krogulecki, 2012). The fact that architects and
designers switched their methodology and started using 2D CAD changed the way we
work, and BIM has the potential to do the same. Many consider BIM to be an evolution

2
of CAD based technology and believe it will result in great benefits for the architecture,
engineering and construction industry. (Migilinskas, Popov, Juocevicius Ustinovichius,
2013).
Structural engineers can take advantage of BIM in different ways, as the model
can be constantly updated with any changes in the design or general specifications,
keeping all the data as accurate as possible (Azhar, 2011). Some of the most important
contributions of BIM for structural engineering activities, like conceptual design,
structural analysis layout and detailing are: reduction of design and drafting errors and
reduction of direct engineering design and drafting costs as a result of improved
productivity. It also allows for better analysis of situations through simulation. The fact
that the use of BIM lets one visualize the whole picture lets one identify potential design
issues, and come up with new and creative ways to solve problems.
This paper will focus on the state of building information modeling and its
influence in structural engineering. The benefits that BIM represents for structural
engineering in the areas of productivity, coordination and consistency of data, and
visualization and simulation are also investigated, all this with the objective of obtaining
a clear idea of the impact that BIM has in structural engineering.

3
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING
Building Information Modeling (BIM) is a methodology of design that is based on
data rich objects that form a model that is used in architecture, engineering and
construction. Part of the central point of BIM is the fact that all the objects that are part of
it have their database that can interrelate to other objects within the model (Ikerd, 2008).
The National BIM Standard (NBIMS) defines BIM as “a digital representation of
physical and functional characteristics of a facility. As such it serves as a shared
knowledge resource for information about a facility forming a reliable basis for decisions
during its life-cycle from inception onward. The BIM is a shared digital representation
founded on open standards for interoperability.”
The results of extensive research and development in academia and industry have
brought many powerful and practical building information modeling tools for analysis,
design and detailing. (Migilinskas et al., 2013). Within a BIM, different disciplines can
include their data, from the architect, structural and MEP. Even details such as finishes,
like specific manufacturers, pricing, can be included as digital data in BIM. This
information is available prior, during and after the construction. Everyone that is working
on the project can access all this information, not only facilitating the process of sharing
information, but maintaining the data more consistent and coordinated around the
different disciplines.

4
To have an effective cooperation between the different engineering disciplines it
is necessary to have the infrastructure’s data properly organized (Shim, Yun Sung,
2011). BIM is known for its design and documentation capabilities, allowing the storage
of useful computable information that stays coordinated and consistent along all its users
(Autodesk, 2012). Structural engineers currently use BIM to mainly create drawings and
for coordination (Salce, 2012).
BIM is not only a fast and convenient way to show owners and stakeholders the
different designs and situations regarding specific projects, but it also lets the different
parts of the design team to better coordinate fabrication of different building systems,
which is one of the reasons behind the speedy adoption of this method (Nawari, 2012).
The transition from the design phase to the construction of a project is also more
seamless in projects using BIM. (Bynum, Issa Olbina, 2013).
The use of BIM can completely change the way infrastructure projects are
developed, executed and managed (Autodesk, 2012). The beginning of BIM was too
focus in architectural area, but as part of the evolution and adoption of different
industries, the different BIM software are on constant evolution to address the needs of
structural engineers, offering better tools that increase its use in the field. One big
difference between BIM and CAD in the initial state of design is that buildings are
modeled using separate components instead of drawn. BIM skips the 2D design of its
cousin CAD and jumps directly into modeling the structure. As a result, drawings are of
second importance and no longer the first place to look up for design information,
becoming reports of design information that are created automatically from the BIM
model.

5
The projects designed and built today have seen a considerable impact by the use
of BIM (Nawari, 2012). Evidence of this tendency can be seen in figure 1. A report from
a study delivered by McGraw Hill Construction about the level of BIM implementation
in infrastructure in the recent years shows how use of BIM have been increasing. Out of
all the participants, about 31% are using BIM on 75% or more of their projects in 2013,
up from a low 7% in 2009. The numbers of participants that are not using BIM on 25% or
less have seen a dramatic decrease, from 73% on 2009 to 21% in 2013. We have got to
the point where imagining big complex projects developed today without using BIM is
hard (Salce, 2012).
Figure 1. Level of BIM implementation for infrastructure over time. Source: McGraw Hill
Construction

6
The improved way that the different disciplines collaborate on a project is one of
the important factors behind the increasing in use of BIM in the industry (Bynum, Issa
Olbina, 2013). BIM facilitates the process of collaboration for architects, structural
engineers and mechanical, electrical and plumbing professionals by allowing multiple
team members to work out of the same model (Bynum, Issa Olbina, 2013).
As can be seen in Figure 2, the user profile in the different engineering
disciplines, structural engineering is in a middle ground, with more usage for
infrastructure related projects than civil engineering in general. The MEP engineering
disciplines, which are represented in the Other Engineers division, lead this are with
approximately 60% actively using BIM in their projects.
Figure 2. User profile: Engineers by discipline. Source: McGraw Hill Construction
The building information model can also contain information like structural and
energy analysis, and project management and cost estimating. BIM can also include
parameters like design codes and criteria (AASHTO) and other standards.

7
One important point behind the increase use of BIM in the industry is the fact that
a lot of different disciplines can take advantage of its benefits in the same platform,
including structural engineers (Salce, 2012). The complexity of many infrastructure
projects requires intense multidisciplinary collaboration. (Autodesk, 2012). With BIM,
project information is available and actionable throughout every phase of the
infrastructure. By the start of the construction phase of a project it is possible to visualize
the project through all the process of construction, including its scheduling (4D) and costs
(5D) (Autodesk, 2012).

8
BIM IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
The results of extensive research and development in academia and industry have
brought many powerful and practical building information modeling tools for analysis,
design and detailing. (Migilinskas et al., 2013). Developments like the affordable
production of steel and commercial electrical welding machines, the personal computer
and the internet have all deeply change the structural engineering profession in a number
of areas like design codes, work processes and building possibilities. And analyzing the
way BIM is developing, it has the potential to have even stronger impact on structural
engineering (Ikerd, 2008).
There is no doubt that BIM is changing the structural engineering industry and is
influencing important aspects of it (Ikerd, 2008). The structural building information
modeling includes all the aspects related to the structure of a specific project (Lee, Bae
Cho, 2012).
The structural buildings that are more dependent in scheduling and prefabrication
are taking a great advantage from BIM. Elements like steel and precast concrete can be
coordinated more easily with BIM, improving its delivery and installation and handling,
with less storage.
The process to prepare a project to input it into structural analysis software is
more efficient, since all the data can be directly transferred from the building model
(Sacks Barak, 2007). The design results are stored in the building information model,
becoming easily available for the detailing process.

9
As can be seen in figure 3, more than 50% of both the architecture and
engineering firms have a very high implementation of BIM for infrastructure projects. It
can also be seen that owners are closely following 42% with a high or very high
implementation, and another 42% with a medium implementation. The fact that a lot of
owners and stakeholders are now requesting projects to be developed using BIM is
another reason behind the recent increase in adoption of BIM in the industry (Salce,
2012).
Figure 3. 2013 Implementation of BIM for Infrastructure. Source: McGraw Hill Construction

10
Structural Information
The types of structural information that can be included into a building
information model are element type, element properties (like area, moment of inertia).
Using all this information, a structural analysis model can be ready, with boundary
conditions, loads, etc., that can be imported into structural analysis software.
Once the model has been updated with all the elements properties like type,
material, boundary conditions, etc., the analysis for structural safety can proceed.
According to the results, then the layout and construction documents can be updated with
the new information.
Structural Design Process
The first step in the structural design process of a project following the traditional
way is to interpret the architectural plans. This gives the structural engineer an idea of the
design and set the foundation to create the analytical model that will be used in the
structural engineering software to analyze the project according to the requirements, be it
gravity, seismic, dynamic or wind. At the same time, usually drafters start the drawing
part, creating a representation of the building and initiating the construction documents.
This cause the creation of multiple drawings that contain the same information.
The fact that there are different models being worked on for the same project
increases the efforts that need to be put in coordination, and opening the opportunity for
errors. If there is a change that the structural engineer made to an element in the design,
and that change is not updated by the drafter the documents become out of sync, affecting
the validity of the design.

11
While using a building information model, both the physical, which contains the
data used in the analysis applications, and analytical information, which is the model
used in the structural analysis, are interconnected in the same place, allowing for its use
not only in the structural analyses of the project, but also to produce the construction
documents.
The structural members like beams, columns, that are part of the physical
representation can be assigned load, material properties and other important information
necessary to run the structural analysis. It also contains the geometric properties, strength
of the materials, and boundary conditions of the structural members.
Structural analyses programs can then import all this information thanks to
embedded tools and application programming interface (API). After the analysis process
is finished, the model can be exported with the results, automatically updating all the
information, and the documentation dependent from it. Analysis results such as the
internal force of a structural member and the area of steel rebar can be stored into the
model for future use.
This greatly reduces the time spent in detailing and drafting, since documents
containing information like the geometric size of a structural member, the type and
quantity of steel rebar, concrete, can be easily generated.
Structural Workflows using BIM
When compared to the traditional way to work, the benefits of using BIM in the
structural design are obvious, especially when analyzing the workflow.

12
Time constrains usually dictate that structural design and construction documents
production start parallel, so as the structural engineers begin their analyses, the structural
drafters begin developing the documentation set (framing plans, bracing elevations,
typical details).
The use of multiple models, models that are not coordinated with each other or
the documentation, requires a manual effort to keep them and the documentation package
synchronized, to the detriment of a firm’s efficiency, quality, and flexibility. Whereas the
use of building information model that drives analysis, coordination and documentation
reduces these problems.
With BIM, referencing the architectural plans is still the first step. But instead of
creating several models, there is just one model, a single integrated structural model that
includes both a physical representation that drives documentation and coordination and
an analytical representation used for multiples analyses.
Structural analysis
Without BIM, individual models must be produces to front end each type of
analysis. One common complain of structural firms is that their highly educated staffs
spend too much time transcribing information from one software package to another,
configuring various analytical models for input into different analysis software
applications, and then manually coordinating the analysis and design results with
documentation (Autodesk, 2012).
With BIM, the analytical and physical representations are created simultaneously,
and are just different views of the computable building model, containing the necessary

13
information needed for third party analysis applications. BIM doesn’t replace the analysis
applications; it provides a common modeling interface to them and a common model to
document the results.
Figure 4. BIM Implementation on Infrastructure by Project Type. Source: McGraw Hill
Construction
The behavior of a structure during its construction differs from its behavior during
its service period, opening the possibility for dangerous situations during the first one
(Zhang Hu, 2010). Structures that vary with time require of a precise method for its
structural analysis during the construction process. Using BIM, it is possible to put the
time dependent actions to the model, having a 4D structural model. This is one of the
main applications of BIM, since the model contains all the information, making it
possible to check and avoid conflicts and safety problems (Shim, Yun Sung, 2011).

14
4D structural information model
A 4D structural information model is a building information model that is
complemented not only with the structural information of the project, but also takes under
consideration the time, enriching all the basic information that is already part of the
model (Zhang Hu, 2010). Among the important points that are included into the new
model are information like schedules, construct ruction activities, resources, and others.
The characteristics of structures under construction are very peculiar (Zhang
Hu, 2010). Usually material properties change over time and loading conditions can vary
depending on the stage and type of activities that undergo. This is why the structural
analysis during constructions has a lot to do with the loading conditions, and the
resistance of the elements in question.
New 3D modeling tools are allowing structural engineers and designers to create
models for documentation and coordination. As a result, more and more structural
engineering firms are embracing this new methodology. BIM software is based on the
object oriented programming, in which instances of structural members are assembled to
create a building structure. Each member possesses the information and functionality that
fully defines it (a beam element has is material and sectional properties) as well as its
purpose within the structure (horizontal member on X level, spanning between columns
Y and Z).
The resulting BIM model contains a wealth of information which can be useful
for inter discipline coordination as well as internal coordination. (Schinler, Nelson, 2008)

15
Structural and civil engineers are traditionally responsible for design of structural
elements, highway, bridges and other infrastructure structures.
BIM based structural design tools help engineers optimize their structural design,
to compare and contrast various approaches to sustainable designs with associated
lifecycle costing, and when a concept is approved, it provides the foundation for
construction sequencing and field operations. Fabrication and construction can be done
error-free, and the effort required for checking drawing declines drastically (Uddin
Khanzode, 2012).

16
BENEFITS
Building information models let structural engineers design, visualize, simulate,
analyze, document, and build projects more efficiently, accurately, and competitively
(Autodesk, 2012). Among the most important benefits of BIM for structural engineer are
productivity, coordination and consistency of data, and improved visualization and
simulation of problems and situations.
Productivity
From the engineering point of view, the most important contribution from BIM is
the increase in productivity, especially when producing in construction documents (Sacks
Barak, 2007). In most structural engineering firms, especially large scale ones; it is
common to work with teams that are in different geographical locations. In fact, it is
expected that team workers would help with different projects according to the needs of
the firm in that moment.
New technologies like cloud servers make this entire process much easier. Being
able to have all the information in an online hard drive, where everyone working on a
project can access it and modify it does wonders when there’s a significant distance
between workers. When this concept is applied to BIM, and it’s naturally data rich
database, it greatly benefits communication and productivity (Nawari, 2012).
The production of the construction documents in 2D is the most labor intensive
part of structural engineering (Sacks Barak, 2007). This is a process that is done
completely automated when using a building information model. Important sections like

17
reinforcement detailing, numbering and rebar schedules are automatically generated,
saving a lot of time and effort. Figure 5 shows the value that architectural and
engineering firms put on BIM according to the project phase. 53% of the firms that
participated on the McGraw Hill Construction report list construction documentation as
one of the top phases where BIM is valuable, only behind the design phase. This shows a
clear indication of the benefits that the architectural and engineering firms are getting
form BIM.
Figure 5. Value of BIM for Infrastructure by Project Phase. Source: McGraw Hill
Construction
An important part of the structural design process is constantly checking the
structure and be aware of needed changes in the design that require structural analysis.

18
Since the building information model automatically updates the entire model with
significant changed information, whenever there is a change that needs to be done,
engineers only have to work to change the information in one place, the model, instead of
having to make sure that everyone realizes about the changes. This advantage in how
easy it is to apply changes is an important productivity advantage. Errors and mistakes
are common, especially when working in complex infrastructure projects where stress
levels and the rush of finishing a project are present (Salce, 2012). Reducing the need to
make extensive checks helps prevent errors in the documentation that can affect the
construction. Figure 6 shows the top internal benefits that architectural and engineering
firms are getting from using BIM for infrastructure projects. 42% of them consider the
reduce errors in documents as one of the top benefits from BIM, clearly showing the
improvement in using BIM at this phase of a project.
Figure 6. Top Internal Benefits of Using BIM for Infrastructure Projects. Source:
McGraw Hill Construction

19
Coordination
Good coordination in a project is essential to get the most out of BIM
(Migilinskas, Popov, Juocevicius Ustinovichius, 2013). A single building information
model is used for both the analysis and the documentation phases, contributing to better
coordination between the structural analysis results and the overall design, increasing
consistency throughout the entire project.
Structural engineers can easily spend more time coordinating a project than
performing the structural analysis (Schinler Nelson, 2008). With the use of BIM, the
time spent in coordination is reduced, allowing structural engineers to focus all their
efforts in solving problems, instead of having to constantly be checking for errors or
coordinating changes made.
The documentation phase of a project is positively impacted by the use of BIM as
well. Using the building information model not only enables the production of
construction documents, but it also serves as a base to present the results from the
structural analysis and design in an easy sharable way, keeping all the information
regarding the analysis, design and documentation of a structural project in one place.
The figure 7 shows the most important infrastructure project factors that add value
to BIM from the McGraw Hill Construction report. Among the top factors are project
complexity and interoperability between team members’ software’s.

20
Figure 7. Most Important Infrastructure Project Factors that Add Value to BIM
Use. Source: McGraw Hill Construction
The bigger and more complex a project is, the more coordination it requires. 61%
of the firms that participated in the McGraw Hill Construction report agree that BIM is
especially valuable when dealing with complex projects. Using BIM not only allows the
team to coordinate better, but to also make better design decisions based on the model
(Schinler Nelson, 2008).
Another important factor that adds value to the use of BIM is the better
interoperability between team members’ soft wares. BIM offers coordination tools that let
architects, structural and MEP engineers manage a project more effectively. For example,
by working with the same model as a base, MEP engineers can layout their systems
around the structural model, improving coordination. One of the most useful tools
available is clash detection, which is a great way to reduce errors by automatically

21
checking for collisions or interferences between the structural system and the ducts and
plumbing systems.
The coordination issues can then be identified and solved in the design phase
instead of extending them to the construction, improving accuracy and reducing errors.
Figure 8 shows the number one factor that architectural and engineering firms consider to
contribute to BIM benefits is the reduced conflicts and changes during construction. 55%
of the firms coincide that BIM has a big impact in these factors.
Figure 8. Most Important Benefits that Contribute Value to Infrastructure Projects.
Source: McGraw Hill Construction

22
BIM also ease the process of coordination when it is time to fabricate structural
members. Good communication is important to make the most out of the process of
modeling a structure (Amor, 2013). BIM effectively connects the structural design with
fabrication, improving communication and the way information is shared between
detailers, fabricators and contractors. This helps with the coordination of the production
and to decrease the time needed to construct concrete and steel structures (Schinler
Nelson, 2008).
Visualization and Simulation
BIM can also be implemented to come up with new and creative solutions to
problems (Bynum, Issa Olbina, 2013). The engineers can easily isolate and filter any
area or element of especial interest from the structure, and are able to visualize it in 3D.
This provides great project insight, enhancing its understanding and facilitating the
process of solving problems and coming up with ideas.
Optimize outcomes by exploring design alternatives more easily and cost
effectively during conceptual design. Once the future design parameters are known, a
BIM process can aid in the creation of alternatives that address them while helping to
identify the most economical and time efficient approach to a construction.
Visualization of projects through BIM also helps improve predictability of the
behavior of a structure. The analysis tools allow the evaluation of a structure performance
digitally, before it is built. One of the most important benefits of BIM is the ability to
create simulations and check different structural scenarios. Simulating different scenarios
of a specific project greatly help with analyzing and taking decisions (Autodesk, 2012).

23
Some of the key attributes associated with these models will improve site
planning by enabling what if scenarios to test and improve different settings (Jacobi,
2011). Simulations of installation conflicts, design clashes, and work flow management
can be performed before the work begins. Construction sequences can be simulated to
facilitate quick and effective decision making by the design team. Real time navigation
through de modeled environment is supported during the simulations to enhance
exploration. Seismic events and the possible impact that they can have on infrastructure
can be simulated using BIM (Bennet, 2012).
Renders and animations can be easily generated from the building information
model, simplifying the process of explaining complex situations. These visualizations can
be used to present ideas in a more clear way, helping teams communicate more
effectively.
BIM offers great potential in seismic retrofit and refurbishment of buildings and
infrastructure projects (HM Government, 2011). Visualizations, simulations and analysis
processes can help mitigate the effects of future infrastructure challenges (Bennet, 2012).
Using BIM and other technologies, like laser scanning, engineers can create highly
detailed structural models of different infrastructure projects that can be used for analysis.
This facilitates the process of identifying and diagnosing problems that infrastructure
might experience in the future, since the building information model can be easily
adapted to graphically illustrate potential failures, leaks, evacuation plans, and so forth.

24
CHAPTER III
CASE STUDY
To understand how the connectivity of BIM software and structural analysis
software works, it is important to introduce the concept of physical and analytical
representation of structure (Autodesk, 2007). The physical model is a true model of the
structure of a project, and the analytical model transfers all the information needed by the
structural engineer. Using a building information model, both the physical and the
analytical representations of the structure remain interconnected, facilitating the process
of transferring information and keeping the integrity of the model.
Software Selection
The software selection is mostly determined by the structural engineering firm.
Structural engineers are usually familiar with different structural analysis programs;
therefor the initial selection of BIM and structural engineering software is based on the
software that the engineering firm is currently using.
Another important point to consider when choosing the software is the type of
analysis that needs to be performed. During the development of a project, the structural
engineer may be required to make different types of analysis to the structure, such as
dynamic, seismic, linear and nonlinear analysis. It is essential that the software meets the
needs of the structural engineer.
There is a trend in the market for the analysis suppliers to move towards a one
stop solution that is capable of providing the full range of analysis options (Autodesk,

25
2007). The selection of a broad and detailed single application will allows the full range
of analysis challenges to be tackled directly without the need to keep updating the
building information model between separate programs.
The Autodesk Revit Suite has a bi-directional link that grants the ability to easily
transfer information with the most used structural analysis softwares in the industry, such
as RISAFloor and RISA 3D by RISA, ETABS and SAP2000 by CSI, and RAM
Structural System by Bentley.
The Revit - RISA Link
The use of an Application Programming Interface (API) makes possible the
process of coming up with very adaptable analysis solutions for different types of
structures. APIs are the core component that allows the transfer of data between the BIM
software and the structural analysis software.
Autodesk has premier partners, like RISA, that have a technical staff available to
interact with Autodesk personnel. This teamwork ensures that the link between the
Autodesk Revit Structure and the RISAFloor and RISA 3D is constantly optimized.
When the link between Revit Structure and RISAFloor and RISA 3D is
habilitated it adds a toolbar that facilitate both the exporting to and importing form RISA
models. The link offers an exchange file tool that lets both Revit and RISA coexist on the
same machine, accommodating to a variety of workflow situations.

26
Figure 9. The Exchange File tool for Revit and RISA.
The link offers a variety of straightforward import and export options to maximize
the control over the elements of the model that are transferred back and forth. An editable
mapping file tool provides the ability to customize the link to support members and
materials that are not included in the software, and a detailed log is constantly updated
during every transfer to provide transparency and facilitate solving problems.

27
Case Study
The following case study analyses the Autodesk Revit and RISA 3D link. A
simple three dimensional frame was created using Revit Structure. It consisted of seven
beams, six columns, and four braces, for a total of seventeen members. W10x39 and
W16x40 were used for the beams and columns, and L4x4 for the braces.
Figure 10. The render view of the frame in Revit Structure.
The model in Revit Structure was then used to create a brand new model in RISA
3D. To perform this task, the Export option was selected from the File tab, and then
Autodesk Revit Exchange File was chosen. Using the Save Exchange File, and an
exchange file was created to be later opened in RISA.

28
The RISA 3D software was then started, and the import new model option was
chose, opening the Import menu, where import from Revit was chosen. The file
previously saved was selected and a new RISA 3D model was created. It shows a
progress bar when creating all the structural elements of the model.
Figure 11. The render view of the frame in RISA 3D.
Once the process is complete, a RISA-Revit link reports shows up, with a list of
all the members and materials that were added to the model. It is exactly the same model
created in Revit. To complete the link, the file was saved in RISA.
Analysis and Results
The next step was to perform an analysis on the frame. A dead load of 1 k/ft, and
a live and wind load of 5k were considered. The structure was solved for the envelope
joint reactions. Once the analysis was completed, the design results were checked using

29
the AISC Steel Code. The results showed that the W16x40 beams of the frame are failing
due to the load conditions on the structure. To solve this problem, the RISA suggested
shape were used, changing the beams to W18x60.
The structure was successfully recalculated, with the new size of the beams
fulfilling the requirements. To further increase changes to the members of the structure,
another single angle was added in the other direction of the brace. Figure 12 shows the
final result of the frame after the structural calculations were finished. The file was then
saved, and exported to Revit Structure. All the information necessary is remembered
from the first transfer. A new window shows the details of what was exported. The file
was saved on top of the previous file, to guarantee that all the information was merged.
Figure 12. The frame after the structural design in RISA 3D.

30
The new updated model was then imported to Revit from RISA using the
Exchange Tool. Revit then compares all the data of the model with the new updated
version, showing everything that has been added or changed in the RISA model. The
exchange report instantly shows that four members where added and three where
modified. Figure 13 shows the new, color coded, updated model; it shows green for all
the new members that were added to the model, and yellow for any changed member. All
the other members that stayed the same are portrait black on the model. This gives a clear
visualization of what was previously in the model and what was changed at the RISA
model.
Figure 13. The frame after it was exported back to Revit Structure.

31
CONCLUSION
The architecture, engineering and construction industry is constantly on demand
to produce work faster, at less cost and higher quality. Structural engineers are problem
solvers and are constantly looking for new ways on how to apply technology to produce
work. One of new methodologies that help today is building information modeling.
The benefits of using building information modeling are evident, especially when
analyzing the way that this methodology enhances the structural design workflow.
Engineers are realizing the power of BIM for more efficient and intelligent design, and
most firms using BIM are reporting strong favor for this technology.
The increase in productivity is a significant benefit that BIM provides in structural
engineering. Construction documents are generated completely automatic when using a
building information model, significantly reducing the time required for detailing. It also
reduces the need to make extensive checks, helping prevent errors in the documentation
that can affect the construction.
Using the building information model not only enables the production of
construction documents, but it also serves as a base to present the results from the
structural analysis and design in an easy sharable way, keeping all the information
regarding the analysis, design and documentation of a structural project in one place. A
single building information model is used for both the analysis and the documentation
phases, contributing to better coordination between the structural analysis results and the
overall design, increasing consistency throughout the entire project. The improved

32
coordination can also be seen in better interoperability between team members’
software’s, allowing architects, structural and MEP engineers to manage a project more
effectively.
The ability to create simulations and check different structural scenarios greatly
help with analyzing a structure and taking decisions. This provides great project insight,
enhancing its understanding and facilitating the process of solving problems and coming
up with ideas. These visualizations can be used to present ideas in a more clear way,
simplifying the process of explaining complex situations and helping teams communicate
more adequately.
The case study developed in this report showed how the connection between the
BIM software and the structural analysis software works. The seamless process of
creating structural model in RISA from a design previously done in Revit Structure, and
the ability to easy make changes and keep track of any alterations made throughout the
model are a clear demonstration of the benefits that structural engineers can get form
using this methodology.
The future of building information modeling is both exciting and challenging. The
way that infrastructure projects are designed and constructed is constantly changing, and
BIM is emerging as an innovative way to perform these duties. Even though BIM is a
relatively recent development, more structural design professionals understand the
potential benefits that can be realized through its use.
BIM will continue to transform the industry, with more structural and
architectural firms recognizing the same opportunities, benefits and values. Clearly, the

33
question is not if BIM will succeed or fail, it is already working its way into projects. The
challenge lies in trying to make the most out of all that BIM has to offer to structural
engineering: improved productivity, coordination and visualization in analysis and
design.

34
REFERENCES
Amor, Tomas, (January, 2013). “Challenging traditional design with BIM.”
STRUCTURE Magazine, pp. 36-37.
Amor, Tomas, (May, 2013). “BIM for masonry.” STRUCTURE Magazine, pp. 18-20.
Autodesk, (2007). “Revit structure and BIM” Autodesk, pp. 1-9.
Autodesk, (2007). “Maintaining BIM integrity in the structural engineering office”
Autodesk, pp. 1-8.
Autodesk, (2011). “Realizing the benefits of BIM” Autodesk, pp. 1-14.
Autodesk, (2012). “BIM for infrastructure: a vehicle for business transformation.”
Autodesk, pp. 1-18.
Autodesk. (2012). “The power of BIM for structural engineering.” Autodesk.
Azhar, Salman. (2011). “Building information modeling (BIM): trends, benefits, risks,
and challenges for the AEC industry. “ Leadership and Management in
Engineering ASCE, 11: 241-252
Bacon, Sheila. (January, 2008). “BIM crosses boundaries at Seattle area high rise.”
Barlish, Kristen, Sullian, Kenneth, (2012). “How to measure the benefits of BIM – a case
study approach.” Automation in Construction 24, 149-159.

35
Bennett, Terry D., (March, 2012). “Role of BIM in infrastructure seismic retrofit.”
Bynum, Patrick, Issa, Raja R. A., Olbina, Svetlana, (2013). “Building information
modeling in support of sustainable design and construction.” Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management ASCE, 24-34.
Gayer, Andrew, (October, 2009). “BIM power: interoperability” STRUCTURE
Magazine, pp. 14-16.
HM Government. (2012). Building information modeling. URN 12/1327
Ikerd, William F., (October, 2008). “The importance of BIM in structural engineering.”
Jacobi, Jim, (April, 2011). “4D BIM or simulation based modeling.” STRUCTURE
Magazine, pp. 17-18.
Lee, Seung II., Bae, Jun-Seo., Cho, Young Sang, (2012). “Efficiency analysis of set
based design with structural building information modeling on high rise building
structures.” Automation in Construction 23, 20-32.
McCuen, Tamera., Suermann, Patrick C., Krogulecki, Matthew J. (2012) “Evaluating
award-winning BIM projects using the Nation Building Information Model
standard capability maturity model.” Journal of Management in Engineering
ASCE, 28: 224-230.
McGraw Hill Construction, (2012) “The business value of BIM for infrastructure.”
SmartMarket Report, pp. 1-60.

The benefits of using building information modeling in structural engineering

More Related Content

Similar to The benefits of using building information modeling in structural engineering (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

The benefits of using building information modeling in structural engineering