This document has not been cited yet.

1. Akaichi, F., R. M. Nayga, Jr. and J. Gil. (2012). Assessing consumers’ willingness to pay for different units of organic milk: Evidence from multi-unit auctions. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 60 (4): 469–94.

2. Ausubel, L.M. (2004). An efficient ascending-bid auction for multiple objects. American Economic Review, 94 (5): 1452-1475. https://www.doi.org/10.1257/0002828043052330.

3. Balcombe, K., Fraser, I., Williams, L., McSorley, E. (2018). Preference Reversals in Discrete Choice Experiments. Inattention or Preference Uncertainty? Some Evidence using eye tracking. Conference Paper, 2019 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society. https://www.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.285050.

4. Becker, G.M., DeGroot, M.H., Marschak, J., 1964. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 9 (3), 226–232.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Bouis, H.E., Saltzman, A. (2017). Improving nutrition through biofortification: a review of evidence from HarvestPlus, 2003 through 2016. Global Food Security 12: 49–58.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Camerer, C. F. and Lowenstein, G. (2003). Behavioral economics: past, present and future. In: C. Camerer, G. Lowenstein and M. Rabin (eds), Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 3–51.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Canavari, M., Drichoutis, A.C., Lusk, J., Nayga Jr, R.M. (2019). How to run an experimental auction: a review of recent advances. European Review of Agricultural Economics 46(5): 862-922.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

8. Cason, T.N., Plott, C.R. (2014). Misconceptions and game form recognition: Challenges to theories of revealed preference and framing. Journal of Political Economy, 122:6, 12351270. https://doi.org/10.1086/677254.

9. Cole, S., Fernando, A.N., Stein, D., Tobacman, J., Business, H., Wharton, I., (2020). Field comparisons of incentive-compatible preference elicitation techniques. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 172: 33-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.01.021.

10. Corrigan, J.R., Depositario, D.P.T., Nayga, R.M., Wu, X., Laude, T.P. (2009). Comparing open-ended choice experiments and experimental auctions: An application to golden rice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (3): 837–53.

11. Corsi, A. (2007). Ambiguity of measured WTP for quality improvements when quantity is unconstrained: a note. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 34(4):501-515.

12. Dennis, E.J., Tonsor G.T., Lusk, J.L. (2021). Choosing quantities impacts individuals’ choice, rationality, and willingness to pay estimates. Agricultural Economics, 52:945–962. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12678 Elbakidze, L., Nayga, R. M., Jr and Li, H. (2013). Willingness to pay for multiple quantities of animal welfare dairy products: results from random Nth-, second-price, and incremental second-price auctions. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D’agroeconomie 61(3): 417–438. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.17447976. 2012.01263.x. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., J. A. List and D. H.Reiley. (2006). Demand reduction in multi-unit auctions with varying numbers of bidders: Theory and evidence from a field experiment. International Economic Review 47 (1): 203–31.

13. Farmer perception and valuation of seed quality: Evidence from bean and cowpea seed auctions in Tanzania and Ghana. Agricultural Economics. 50(4): 495– 507. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12505 Mastenbroek, A., Sirutyte, I., Sparrow, R. (2021). Information barriers to adoption of agricultural technologies: willingness to pay for certified seed of an open pollinated maize variety in northern Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2021, 180–201, https://www.doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12395 Morgan, S., Mason, N.M., Maredia, M.K. (2020). Lead-farmer extension and smallholder valuation of new agricultural technologies in Tanzania. Food Policy 97: 101955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101955.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

14. Grether, D., Plott, C. (1979). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 69: 623-638.

15. Gwaze, Tinashe. (2022). Personal Communication regarding bean seed pack sizes in the market.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Harrison, G.W., Johnson, E., McInnes, M.M., Rustrom, E.E. (2003). Individual choice in the laboratory: Paradox reloaded. Working Paper, Dept. Economics, University of Central Florida, September.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Heath, C. and Soll, J. B. (1996). Mental budgeting and consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research 23(1): 40–52. https://www.doi.org/10.1086/209465.

18. Horowitz, J.K. (2006). The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism is not necessarily incentive compatible, even for non-random goods. Economics Letters, (93) 1: 6-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.033.

19. Lin, W, Ortega, D., and Caputo, V. (2022). Experimental quantity, mental budgeting and food choice: a discrete choice experiment application. European Review of Agricultural Economics, jbac017, https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbac017.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. List, J.A., Gallet, C.A. (2001). What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Environ. Resource Econ. 20 (3), 241–254.

21. List, J.A., Lucking-Reiley, D. (2002). Bidding behavior and decision costs in field experiments.

22. Lusk, J., Hudson, D. (2004). Willingness-to-pay estimates and their relevance to agribusiness decision making. Review of Agricultural Economics 26(2): 152–169. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00168.x. Lusk, J.L., Shogren, J.F. (2007). Experimental auctions: methods and applications in economic and marketing research. Cambridge University Press.

23. Maredia, MK, Bartle, B. (2022) Excess demand amid quality misperceptions: the case for lowcost seed quality signalling strategies, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 50(2): 360–394, https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbac019 Maredia, MK, Shupp, R, Opoku, E, Mishili, F., Reyes, B., Kusolwa, F.K., Kudra, A. (2019).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Ortega, D.L.., Wolf, C A., (2018). Demand for farm animal welfare and producer implications: Results from a field experiment in Michigan. Food Policy, 74: 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.11.006.

25. Rosh, S., Ortega, D. (2018). Willingness to contract versus opportunity to contract: a case study in Kenya’s French bean export market. Agricultural Economics, 50:7-37.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
26. Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist 50(5): 364.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
27. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12(3): 183–206.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. Thaler, R. H., Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy 89(2): 392–406. https://www.doi.org/10.1086/260971.

29. Win, M.T., Maredia, M.K. & Boughton, D. (2023). Farmer demand for certified legume seeds and the viability of farmer seed enterprises: Evidence from Myanmar. Food Security. 15, 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01338-0 Wooldridge, J. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

30. Wooldridge, J. (2016). Introductory econometrics: a modern approach (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Yue, C., Zhao, S., Gallardo, K., McCracken, V., Luby, J. and McFerson, J. (2017). U.S. growers’ willingness to pay for improvement in rosaceous fruit traits. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 46(1): 103–122. https://www.doi.rog/10.1017/age.2016.31.

32. Zapata, S. D. and Carpio, C. E. (2014). The theoretical structure of producer willingness to pay estimates. Agricultural Economics 45(5): 613–623. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/agec.12110.

1. Consumers willingness to pay for safe and quality milk: Evidence from experimental auctions in Rwanda. (2023). Habiyaremye, Naphtal ; Mtimet, Nadhem ; Obare, Gideon A ; Ouma, Emily A.
   In: Agribusiness.
   RePEc:wly:agribz:v:39:y:2023:i:4:p:1049-1074.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The effect of product quantity on willingness to pay: A meta‐regression analysis of beef valuation studies. (2023). Lin, Wen.
   In: Agribusiness.
   RePEc:wly:agribz:v:39:y:2023:i:3:p:646-663.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Turkish Consumers’ Perceptions of Organic Milk and the Factors Affecting Consumption: The Case of Kocaeli, Türkiye. (2023). Can, Bahar Aydin.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10044-:d:1178811.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Does Bid Quantity Matter? Comparing Farmer Willingness-to-Pay for Specified vs Open-Ended Quantities of Biofortified Bean and Maize Seed in a Non-hypothetical Field Experiment. (2023). Ortega, David ; Maredia, Mywish K ; Herrington, Caitlin L ; Reyes, Byron A.
   In: 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA.
   RePEc:ags:aaea22:335919.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Bundling food labels: What role could the labels “Organic,” “Local” and “Low Fat” play in fostering the demand for animal‐friendly meat. (2022). Revoredo-Giha, Cesar ; Glenk, Klaus ; Akaichi, Faical ; Revoredogiha, Cesar.
   In: Agribusiness.
   RePEc:wly:agribz:v:38:y:2022:i:2:p:349-370.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Long‐term dynamics of US organic milk, eggs, and yogurt premiums. (2022). McCluskey, Jill ; Carlson, Andrea ; Badruddoza, Syed.
   In: Agribusiness.
   RePEc:wly:agribz:v:38:y:2022:i:1:p:45-72.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. A price premium for the farmer‐owned label? A choice experiment with milk consumers in the Netherlands. (2021). Grashuis, Jasper.
   In: Agribusiness.
   RePEc:wly:agribz:v:37:y:2021:i:4:p:749-763.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Sustainability in the Beverage Industry: A Research Agenda from the Demand Side. (2020). Sellers-Rubio, Ricardo ; Rodriguez-Sanchez, Carla.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:186-:d:469142.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Consumer Buying Behavior of Organic Food with Respect to Health and Safety Concerns among Adolescents. (2019). Raza, Syed ; Nisar, Wasay ; Shah, Nida.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:93570.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. ORGANIC FOOD: IDENTIFYING ACTIONABLE SEGMENTS. (2019). Baglione, Stephen L ; Tucci, Louis A ; Stanton, John L.
    In: Holistic Marketing Management Journal.
    RePEc:hmm:journl:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:10-27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. The Effects of Organic Label on Marketing Performance (Prices, Sales, and Margins). (2019). Franois-Heude, Alain ; Aurier, Philippe ; Bosseaux, Jessica.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03079843.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The official quality signs influence on prices and volumes: the case of organic fresh eggs. (2019). Franois-Heude, Alain ; Aurier, Philippe ; Bosseaux, Jessica.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03079779.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Foods with Traceability Information: Ex-Ante Quality Assurance or Ex-Post Traceability?. (2019). Chen, Xiujuan ; Ying, Ruiyao ; Wu, Linhai ; Tsai, Fu-Sheng ; Zhu, Dian ; Hou, BO.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1464-:d:212496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. A Tax Coming from the IPCC Carbon Prices Cannot Change Consumption: Evidence from an Experiment. (2019). marette, stéphan ; Yokessa, Maimouna.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4834-:d:264115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Sustainable agri-food products: A review of consumer preference studies through experimental economics. (2018). Chiorri, Massimo ; Cecchini, Lucio ; Torquati, Biancamaria.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:64:y:2018:i:12:id:272-2017-agricecon.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Cant Buy Me Green? A Review of Consumer Perceptions of and Behavior Toward the Price of Organic Food. (2017). Zielke, Stephan ; Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica.
    In: Journal of Consumer Affairs.
    RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:51:y:2017:i:1:p:211-251.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Opportunities for Western Food Products in China: The Case of Orange Juice Demand. (2016). House, Lisa ; Gao, Zhifeng ; Chen, Xuqi ; Ge, Jiaoju ; Gmitter, Fred ; Zong, Chengfeng .
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:32:y:2016:i:3:p:343-362.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Comparing Consumers WIllingness to Pay for Conventional, Non-Certified Organic and Organic Milk from Small and Large Farms. (2015). Schott, Lenna .
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:212998.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Value elicitation for multiple quantities of a quasi-public good using open ended choice experiments and uniform price auctions. (2014). Nayga, Rodolfo ; McIntosh, Christopher ; Elbakidze, Levan ; Li, Hao.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:45:y:2014:i:2:p:253-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Consumer willingness to pay for nano-packaged food products: evidence from experimental auctions and visual processing data. (2013). Katare, Bhagyashree.
    In: Master's Theses and Plan B Papers.
    RePEc:ags:umapmt:162233.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Consumer Willingness to Pay for Nano-packaged Food Products: Evidence from Experimental Auctions. (2013). Hurley, Terrance ; Yue, Chengyan ; Katare, Bhagyashree.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:149676.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Consumer Preferences for Tennessee Milk. (). Upendram, Sreedhar ; DeLong, Karen ; Jensen, Kimberly L ; Eckelkamp, Elizabeth.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:305485.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 08:54:04 || Missing content? Let us know