This document has not been cited yet.

1. Akaichi, F., Nayga, R.M.Jr., and Gil., J.M., “Are Results from Non-Hypothetical ChoiceBased Conjoint Analysis and Non-Hypothetical Recoded-Ranking Conjoint Analysis Similar?”American Journal of Agricultural Economics Vol. 95, (2013) pp. 949-963.

2. Alemu, M.H., Mørkbak, M.R., Olsen, S.B., and Jensen, C.L. “Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-Attendance in Choice Experiments.” Environmental and resource economics, Vol. 54, (2013) pp. 333-359.

3. Bello, M., and Abdulai, A. “Impact of Ex-Ante Hypothetical Bias Mitigation Methods on Attribute Non-Attendance in Choice Experiments”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 98, (2016) pp. 560-574.

4. Campbell, D., and Lorimer., V.S., “Accomodating attribute processing strategies in stated choice analysis: do respondents do what they say they do?” In: European Association of Enviormental and Resources Economics, Annual Conference, Amsterdam, June 2009.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Campbell, D., Hensher, D.A., and Scarpa, R. “Non-Attendance to Attributes in Enviormental Choice Analysis: a Latent Class Specification.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 1, (2011) pp.1-16.

6. Campbell, D., Hutchinson, W.G., and Scarpa., R. “Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments. ” Environmental & Resource Economics, Vol. 41, (2008) pp. 401-417.

7. Caparrós A., Oviedo, J.L., and Campos, P. “Would you Choose your Preferred option? Comparing Choice and Recoded Ranking Experiments.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 90, (2008) pp. 843-855.

8. Caputo, V., Loo, E. J.V., Scarpa, R., Nayga, R.M.Jr., and Verbeke, W. “Comparing serial and choice task stated and inferred attribute non attendance methods in food choice experiments” Journal of Agricultural Economics, (2017) pp. 1-23.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Carlsson F, Kataria M, Lampi E. “Dealing with Ignored Attributes in Choice Experiments on Valuation of Sweden’s Environmental Quality Objectives”. Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 47, (2010) pp. 65-89.

10. Chang, J.B., Lusk, J.L., and Norwood, B. “How closely do hypothetical surveys and laboratory experiments predict field behavior?”American Journal of Agriculture Economics Vol. 96, (2009) pp. 518-534.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Collins, A.T., Rose, J.M., and Hensher, D.A. “Specification issues in a generalized random parameters attribute non-attendance model”. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 56, (2013) pp. 234-253.

12. Corrigan, J.R., Dinah, P.T., Rodolfo, M.N., Ximing, W., and Tiffany, P.L. “Comparing openended choice experiments and experimental auctions: An apllication to golden rice.” American Journal of Agriculture Economic Vol. 91, (2009) pp. 837-853.

13. De Bekker, E., Ryan, M., and Gerard, K. “Discrete choice experiment in health economics: a review of the literature.”Health Economics Vol. 21, (2012) pp. 145-172.

14. DeShazo, J.R., and Fermo, G. “Implications of rationally-adaptive pre-choice behavior for the design and estimation of choice models.” Working paper. (2004).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Dong, S., Ding M., and Huber J. “A simple mechanism to incentive-align conjoint experiment.”International Journal of Research in Marketing Vol. 27, (2010) pp. 2532.

16. Greene, W.H., Hensher, D.A., “Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model.” Applied Economics Vol. 45, (2013) pp. 1897-1902.

17. Hensher, D.A., and Greene, W.H. “Non-Attendance and Dual Processing of Common-metric Attributes in Choice Analysis: a Latent Class Specification.” Empirical Economics Vol. 39, (2010) pp. 413-426.

18. Hensher, D.A., and Rose, J.M., “Simplifying Choice Through Attribute Preservation or NonAttendance: Implications for Willingness to Pay.” Transportation Research Part E Vol. 45, (2009) pp. 583-590.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. Hensher, D.A., Rose, J., and Greene, W.H. “The Implications on Willingness to Pay of Respondents Ignoring Specific Attributes.” Transportation Vol. 32, (2005) pp. 203222.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

20. Hess, S., and Hensher, D.A. “Using Conditioning on Observed Choices to Retrieve Individual-Specific Attribute Processing Strategies.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological Vol. 44, (2010) pp.781-790.

21. Hess, S., Stathopoulos, A., Campbell, V. O’Neill and Caussade, S. “It’s not that I don’t care, I just don’t care very much: confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneity.” Transportation, Vol. 40, (2013) pp. 583-607.

22. Hole, A.R. “A discrete choice model with endogenous attribute attendance.” Economics Letters Vol. 110, (2011) pp. 203-205.

23. Hoyos, D., Mariel, P., and Meyerhoff, J., “Comparing the performance of different approaches to deal with attribute non-attendance in discrete choice experiments: a simulation experiment.” BILTOKI 20100, Universidad del País Vasco – Departemento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística) (2010).

24. Kehlbacher, A., Balcombe, K., and Bennett, R. “Stated attribute Non-attendance in successive choice experiment” Journal of Agriculture Economics, Vol. 64, (2013) pp. 693-706.

25. Lagarde, M. “Investigating attribute non-attendance and its consequences in choice experiments with latent Class Models.” Health Economics, Vol. 22, (2013) pp. 554567.

26. Lancaster, K.J. “A new approach to consumer theory.” The journal of political economy Vol. 74 (1966) pp. 132-157.

27. Lancsar, E., Louviere, J., Donaldson, C., Currie, G., and Burgess, L. “Best worst discrete choice experiment in health: Methods and an application.” Social Science and Medicine Vol. 76, (2013) pp.74-82.

28. Louviere, J.J., Street, D., Burgess, L., Wasi, N., Towhidul, I., and Anthony, A.J.M. “Modelling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information.” Journal of Choice Modelling Vol. 1, (2008) pp.128-163.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Lusk, J.L., Fields, D., and Prevatt, W. “An Incentive Compatible Conjoint Ranking Mechanism.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics Vol. 90, (2008) pp.487– 98.

30. Mariel, P., Hoyos, D., and Meyerhoff, J. “Stated or Inferred Attribute Non-Attendance? A Simulation Approach.” Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales (Agricultural and Resource Economics) Vol. 13, (2013) pp. 51-67.

31. McFadden, D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, En Zarembka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in econometrics.(Academic press, Nueva York, 1973).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. Menapace L, Colson, G., Grebitus, C., and Facendola, M. “Consumers’ preferences for geographical origin labels: evidence from the Canadian olive oil market.” European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 38, (2011) pp. 193–212.

33. Puckett, S. M., and Hensher, D.A. “The Role of Attribute Processing Strategies in Estimating the Preferences of Road Freight Stakeholders.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review Vol. 44(2008) pp. 379-395.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Scarpa, R., Nataro, S., Louviere, J., and Raffaelli, R. “Exploring scale effects of best/worst Rank ordered choice data to estimate benefits of tourism in alpine grazing commons.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 93 (2011) pp. 813-828.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. Scarpa, R., Thiene, M., and Hensher, D.A. “Monitoring Choice Task Attribute Attendance in Nonmarket Valuation of Multiple Park Management Dervices: Does It Matter?” Land Economics, Vol. 86 (2010) pp. 817-839.

36. Scarpa, R., Zanoli, R., Bruschi, V., and Naspetti, S. “Inferred and Stated Attribute NonAttendance in Food Choice Experiments.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics Vol. 95 (2013) pp. 165-180.

37. Street, D., and Burgess, L.B. “The Construction of Optimal Stated Choice Experiments: Theory and Methods.” (Hoboken, New Jersey, 2007).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Italian Consumer Willingness to Pay for Agri-Food Sustainable Certification Labels: The Role of Sociodemographic Factors. (2025). Betti, Gianni ; Tozzi, Cristiana ; Riccaboni, Angelo ; Brogi, Leonardo ; Gagliardi, Francesca.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6792-:d:1710297.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Development of agroforestry food resources in Niger: Are farmers’ preferences context specific?. (2022). Lawali, Sitou ; Alia, Ricardo ; Solio, Mario ; Agundez, Dolores ; Mahamane, Ali.
   In: World Development.
   RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:157:y:2022:i:c:s0305750x22001413.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data? The role of model complexity in a discrete choice experiment about colorectal cancer screening. (2022). , Samare ; de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
   In: Social Science & Medicine.
   RePEc:eee:socmed:v:315:y:2022:i:c:s027795362200836x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. What We Can Learn from the Interactions of Food Traceable Attributes? a Case Study of Fuji Apple in China. (2021). Liu, Ruifeng ; ,, .
   In: 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual.
   RePEc:ags:iaae21:315916.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Stated preferences over job characteristics: A panel study. (2020). Yoo, Hong Il ; Il, Hong ; Doiron, Denise.
   In: Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique.
   RePEc:wly:canjec:v:53:y:2020:i:1:p:43-82.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Investigating Preference Inconsistencies in Incentive Structures that Account for House Money Effects. (2020). Zhao, Shuoli ; Kassas, Bachir ; Zhai, Qianqian ; Chen, Lijun.
   In: 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri.
   RePEc:ags:aaea20:304584.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Comparing results of ranking conjoint analyses, best–worst scaling and discrete choice experiments in a nonhypothetical context. (2019). Costa-Font, Montserrat ; Gil, Jose Maria ; Akaichi, Faical ; Yangui, Ahmed.
   In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
   RePEc:ags:aareaj:333766.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Constructing a consumption model of fine dining from the perspective of behavioral economics. (2018). Hsu, Sheng-Hsun ; Tsai, Sang-Bing ; Hsiao, Cheng-Fu.
   In: PLOS ONE.
   RePEc:plo:pone00:0194886.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The impact of deal€ proneness on WTP estimates in incentive€ aligned value elicitation methods. (2018). Gao, Zhifeng ; Shi, Lijia ; Xie, Jing.
   In: Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:bla:agecon:v:49:y:2018:i:3:p:353-362.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Investigating attribute non-attendance effects in conjoint analysis methods performance: Choice experiment, ranking conjoint analysis and best worst scaling.. (2018). Akaichi, Faical ; Gil, J M ; Yangui, A.
    In: 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae18:275989.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. On the use of flexible mixing distributions in WTP space: an induced value choice experiment. (2018). Palma, Marco ; Nayga, Rodolfo ; Bazzani, Claudia.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:313581.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Temporal Stability of Stated Preferences: The Case of Junior Nursing Jobs. (2017). Yoo, Hong Il ; Doiron, Denise ; Il, Hong.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:26:y:2017:i:6:p:802-809.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. A Latent Class Nested Logit Model for Rank-Ordered Data with Application to Cork Oak Reforestation. (2017). Yoo, Hong Il ; Oviedo, Jose ; Il, Hong.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:68:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0058-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. TESTING COMMITMENT COST THEORY IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS. (2017). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Caputo, Vincenzina ; Canavari, Maurizio ; Bazzani, Claudia.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:55:y:2017:i:1:p:383-396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Enhancing Agent-Based Models with Discrete Choice Experiments. (2016). Holm, Stefan ; Lemm, Renato ; Thees, Oliver ; Hilty, Lorenz M.
    In: Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation.
    RePEc:jas:jasssj:2015-101-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Testing convergent validity in choice experiments: Application to public recreation in Spanish stone pine and cork oak forests. (2016). Oviedo, Jose ; Campos, Pablo ; Ruiz-Gauna, Itziar ; Caparros, Alejandro.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:25:y:2016:i:c:p:130-148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. On the Use of the BDM Mechanism in Non-Hypothetical Choice Experiments. (2016). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Caputo, Vincenzina ; Canavari, Maurizio ; Bazzani, Claudia ; Danforth, Diana M.
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts.
    RePEc:ags:aaea16:235904.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Testing convergent validity in choice experiments: application to public recreation in Spanish Stone pine and Cork oak forests. (2015). Oviedo, Jose ; Campos, Pablo ; Ruiz-Gauna, Itziar ; Caparros, Alejandro.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ipp:wpaper:1504.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Information and visual attention in contingent valuation and choice modeling: field and eye-tracking experiments applied to reforestations in Spain. (2015). Oviedo, Jose ; Caparros, Alejandro.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:4:p:185-204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Are ranking preferences information methods comparable with the choice experiment information in predicting actual behavior?. (2014). Akaichi, Faical ; Costa-Font, Montserrat ; Gil, Jose Maria.
    In: 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
    RePEc:ags:eaae14:182672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Do experimental protocols in Conjoint Analysis matter in non Hypothetical settings?. (2014). Akaichi, Faical ; Costa-Font, M. ; Gil, J. M. ; Yangui, A..
    In: 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France.
    RePEc:ags:aesc14:170345.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-05 22:29:15 || Missing content? Let us know