1. Valuing Ecosystem Services and Downstream Water Quality Improvement in the U.S. Corn Belt. (2023). Gramig, Benjamin ; Oh, Seojeong.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:85:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-023-00784-4.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Meeting the Expectations of the Customer: Consumer Valuation of Broccoli Produced in the Eastern United States and the Impact of Local Marketing. (2023). Gomez, Miguel ; Bjorkman, Thomas ; Wasserman-Olin, Rebecca.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7878-:d:1144652.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Willingness to Pay for Alternative Energies in Uganda: Energy Needs and Policy Instruments towards Zero Deforestation 2030 and Climate Change. (2023). Bamwesigye, Dastan.
   In: Energies.
   RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:980-:d:1036779.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Mobilising the public to fight poverty using anti‐poverty labels in online food markets: Evidence from a real experimental auction. (2023). Jiang, YU ; Jin, Shaosheng ; Wang, Holly H.
   In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:bla:jageco:v:74:y:2023:i:1:p:168-190.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Impacts of duo‐regional generic advertising of social media on consumer preference. (2022). Gao, Zhifeng ; Jiang, Yuan ; Heng, Yan ; Chen, Xuqi.
   In: Agribusiness.
   RePEc:wly:agribz:v:38:y:2022:i:1:p:21-44.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Inattention, availability bias, and attribute premium estimation for a biobased product. (2022). DeLong, Karen ; Lambert, Dayton ; Jensen, Kimberly L ; Cheng, Haotian.
   In: Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:bla:agecon:v:53:y:2022:i:2:p:274-288.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Quick and easy? Respondent evaluations of the Becker–DeGroot–Marschak and multiple price list valuation mechanisms. (2021). Asioli, Daniele ; Alfnes, Frode ; Mignani, Adriana.
   In: Agribusiness.
   RePEc:wly:agribz:v:37:y:2021:i:2:p:215-234.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Health Is Wealth: Study on Consumer Preferences and the Willingness to Pay for Ecological Agricultural Product Traceability Technology: Evidence from Jiangxi Province China. (2021). Ji, Xueqiang ; Chen, Ximing ; Zada, Shagufta ; Shang, Jie ; Ramirez-Sobrino, Jesus ; Ariza-Montes, Antonio.
   In: IJERPH.
   RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:11761-:d:675408.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The impact of customer ratings on consumer choice of fresh produce: A stated preference experiment approach. (2020). House, Lisa ; Gao, Zhifeng ; Shi, Lijia ; He, Chenyi.
   In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.
   RePEc:bla:canjag:v:68:y:2020:i:3:p:359-373.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Chinese consumers’ preferences for food quality test/measurement indicators and cues of milk powder: A case of Zhengzhou, China. (2019). Wang, Erpeng ; Gao, Zhifeng ; Heng, Yan ; Shi, Lijia.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:89:y:2019:i:c:s030691921930613x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Pushing subjects beyond rationality with more alternatives in experimental auctions. (2019). Palma, Marco ; Chavez, Daniel.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:50:y:2019:i:2:p:207-217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Akaichi, 2013. Are results from non-hypothetical choice-based conjoint analyses and non-hypothetical recoded-ranking conjoint analyses similar. In: Am. J. Agric. Econ, (95) 4, 949

2. Alfnes, 2010. Cognitive dissonance as a means of reducing hypothetical bias. In: Euro. Rev. Agric. Econ, (37) 2, 147

3. Becker, 1964. Measuring utility by a single response sequential method. In: Behav. Sci, (9) 3, 226
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Cameron, 1994. Estimation using contingent valuation from a “dichotomous choice with follow-up” questionnaire. In: J. Environ. Econ. Manage, (27) 3, 218
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Charness, 2012. Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. In: J. Econ. Behav. Organ, (81) 1, 1

6. Chen, 2016. Opportunities for Western food products in China: The case of orange juice demand. In: Agribusiness, (32) 3, 343

7. Collins, 2009. Incentive compatibility tests of choice experiment value elicitation questions. In: J. Environ. Econ. Manag, (58) 2, 226

8. Corrigan, 2006. Posted prices and bid affiliation: Evidence from experimental auctions. In: Am. J. Agric. Econ, (88) 4, 1078

9. Corrigan, 2009. Comparing open-ended choice experiments and experimental auctions: An application to golden rice. In: Am. J. Agric. Econ., (91) 3, 837

10. Dastidar, 2016. An investigation of consumers' exploratory tendencies as motivators of their responsive behaviour to deals. In: IIMB Manage. Rev., (28) 2, 72
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. Ding, 2005a. Emotional bidders-An analytical and experimental examination of consumers' behavior in a priceline-like reverse auction. In: Manage. Sci., (51) 3, 352

12. Ding, 2005b. Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. In: J. Mark. Res., (42) 1, 67

13. Fiebig, 2010. The generalized multinomial logit model: Accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. In: Mark. Sci., (29) 3, 393

14. Gao, 2009. Effects of label information on consumer willingness-to-pay for food attributes. In: Am. J. Agric. Econ, (91) 3, 795
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Gao, 2010. Using choice experiments to estimate consumer valuation: The role of experimental design and attribute information loads. In: Agric. Econ., (41) 6, 555

16. Gracia, 2011. Are valuations from non-hypothetical choice experiments different from those of experimental auctions?. In: Am. J. Agric. Econ, (93) 5, 1358

17. Grebitus, 2013. Explaining differences in real and hypothetical experimental auctions and choice experiments with personality. In: J. Econ. Psychol, (36), 11

18. Hanemann, 1991. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. In: Am. J. Agric. Econ., (73) 4, 1255

19. Horowitz, 2006. The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism is not necessarily incentive compatible, even for non-random goods. In: Econ. Lett., (93) 1, 6

20. Kuhfeld, W.F. 2007 Experimental design and choice macros https://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/ts722i.pdf
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Kumar, 2009. Consumer Behaviour and Branding: Concepts, Readings, and Cases-The Indian context
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
22. Lee, 2000. Retail bargaining behaviour of American and Chinese customers. In: Eur. J. Mark, (34) 1/2, 190
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

23. List, 1998. Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a field experiment. In: J. Econ. Behav. Organ, (37) 2, 193

24. List, 2001. Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sports cards. In: Am. Econ. Rev., (91) 5, 1498

25. List, 2003. Does market experience eliminate market anomalies. In: Q. J. Econ., (118) 1, 41

26. Louviere, 2002. Dissecting the random component of utility. In: Mark Lett, (13) 3, 177
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

27. Louviere, 2008. Designing discrete choice experiments: Do optimal designs come at a price. In: J. Consumer Res, (35) 2, 360

28. Louviere, J.J. Eagle, T. 2006 Confound it! That pesky little scale constant messes up our convenient assumptions 211 228
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Lusk, 2004. Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks. In: Am. J. Agric. Econ., (86) 2, 467

30. Lusk, 2004. Experimental auction procedure: Impact on valuation of quality differentiated goods. In: Am. J. Agric. Econ., (86) 2, 389

31. Lusk, 2006. Auction bids and shopping choices. In: Adv. Econ. Anal. Pol., (6) 1, 1539

32. Martínez, 2006. The effect of consumer's psychographic variables upon deal-proneness. In: J. Retailing Consumer Services, (13) 3, 157
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
33. Miller, 2011. How should consumers’ willingness to pay be measured? An empirical comparison of state-of-the-art approaches. In: J. Mark. Res., (48) 1, 172
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

34. Norwood, 2011. Social desirability bias in real, hypothetical, and inferred valuation experiments. In: Am. J. Agric. Econ., (93) 2, 528

35. O'Rourke, 2013. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Scarpa, 2008. Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: How to measure it, what to report and why. In: Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., (52) 3, 253

37. Shi, 2013. Impact of purchase intentions on full and partial bids in BDM auctions: Willingness-to-pay for organic and local blueberries. In: J. Agric. Econ., (64) 3, 707

38. Shi, 2014. The cross-price effect on willingness-to-pay estimates in open-ended contingent valuation. In: Food Policy, (46), 13

39. Shogren, 2001a. Auction mechanisms and the measurement of WTP and WTA. In: Resour. Energy Econ., (23) 2, 97

40. Shogren, 2001b. A random nth-price auction. In: J. Econ. Behav. Organ., (46) 4, 409

41. Shugan, 2005. Marketing and designing transaction games. In: Marketing Sci, (24) 4, 525

42. Tobin, 1958. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. In: Econometrica, (26) 1, 24
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Train, K. 2001 A comparison of hierarchical Bayes and maximum simulated likelihood for mixed logit https://eml.berkeley.edu/~train/compare.pdf
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Tversky, 1993. Context-dependent preferences. In: Manage. Sci., (39) 10, 1179

45. Voelckner, 2006. An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers' willingness to pay. In: Mark. Lett, (17) 2, 137

46. Yu, 2014. Can willingness-to-pay values be manipulated? Evidence from an organic food experiment in China. In: Agric. Econ., (45) S1, 119

1. Improving willingness-to-pay studies for traditional food products in developing countries: Evidence using repeated experiments. (2024). Emediegwu, Lotanna E ; Karim, Ramota O ; Awogbemi, Kofoworola A ; Animashaun, Jubril.
   In: African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
   RePEc:ags:afjare:347734.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. How to Prevent Stress in the Workplace by Emotional Regulation? The Relationship Between Compulsory Citizen Behavior, Job Engagement, and Job Performance. (2022). Liu, Wen-Hsiu ; Hung, Tsang-Kai ; Tian, MU ; Lin, Ming ; Wang, Chih-Hung.
   In: SAGE Open.
   RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221105483.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Development of agroforestry food resources in Niger: Are farmers’ preferences context specific?. (2022). Lawali, Sitou ; Alia, Ricardo ; Solio, Mario ; Agundez, Dolores ; Mahamane, Ali.
   In: World Development.
   RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:157:y:2022:i:c:s0305750x22001413.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data? The role of model complexity in a discrete choice experiment about colorectal cancer screening. (2022). , Samare ; de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
   In: Social Science & Medicine.
   RePEc:eee:socmed:v:315:y:2022:i:c:s027795362200836x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Sweet or not: Using information and cognitive dissonance to nudge children toward healthier food choices. (2022). Nguyen, Trang ; van den Berg, Marrit ; de Brauw, Alan.
   In: Economics & Human Biology.
   RePEc:eee:ehbiol:v:47:y:2022:i:c:s1570677x22000818.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Real payment priming to reduce potential hypothetical bias. (2022). Hu, Wuyang ; Jiang, QI ; Penn, Jerrod.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:45:y:2022:i:c:s1755534522000409.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Compensation Options for Quarantine Costs in Plant Production. (2022). Odening, Martin ; Filler, Gunther ; Filiptseva, Anna.
   In: 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022.
   RePEc:ags:gewi22:329595.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. On the Use of Virtual Reality in Mitigating Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments. (2021). Yang, Wei ; Nayga, Rodolfo ; Fang, Di ; Bazzani, Claudia ; West, Grant H ; Levy, Charles E ; Lok, Benjamin C ; Snell, Heather A.
   In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:103:y:2021:i:1:p:142-161.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The Impact of Career Concerns and Cognitive Dissonance on Bureaucrats’ Use of Benefit-Cost Analysis. (2021). Jussila Hammes, Johanna.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:80:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-021-00590-w.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Gap between words and actions: Empirical study on consistency of residents supporting renewable energy development in China. (2021). Sun, Chuanwang ; Zheng, Xuemei ; Fang, Xingming ; Wang, LU ; Wei, Jing.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:148:y:2021:i:pa:s030142152030656x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods. (2021). Oppewal, Harmen ; Lancsar, Emily ; Bliemer, Michiel ; Haghani, Milad ; Rose, John M.
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:41:y:2021:i:c:s1755534521000555.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Does low-carbon travel intention really lead to actual low-carbon travel? Evidence from urban residents in China. (2021). Lin, Boqiang ; Wang, Xia.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:72:y:2021:i:c:p:743-756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods. (2021). Oppewal, Harmen ; Bliemer, Michiel ; Haghani, Milad ; Rose, John M ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2102.02945.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Integrative synthesis of empirical evidence and conceptualisation of external validity. (2021). Oppewal, Harmen ; Bliemer, Michiel ; Haghani, Milad ; Rose, John M ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2102.02940.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. What We Can Learn from the Interactions of Food Traceable Attributes? a Case Study of Fuji Apple in China. (2021). Liu, Ruifeng ; ,, .
    In: 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual.
    RePEc:ags:iaae21:315916.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Stated preferences over job characteristics: A panel study. (2020). Yoo, Hong Il ; Il, Hong ; Doiron, Denise.
    In: Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique.
    RePEc:wly:canjec:v:53:y:2020:i:1:p:43-82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Honey, Mugs and Caricatures: anchors on prices of consumer goods only hold hypothetically. (2020). Krawczyk, Micha ; Brzozowicz, Magdalena.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2020-40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Investigating Preference Inconsistencies in Incentive Structures that Account for House Money Effects. (2020). Zhao, Shuoli ; Kassas, Bachir ; Zhai, Qianqian ; Chen, Lijun.
    In: 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri.
    RePEc:ags:aaea20:304584.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Promoting demand-based pricing. (2019). Larson, Ronald.
    In: Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management.
    RePEc:pal:jorapm:v:18:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1057_s41272-017-0126-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Comparing results of ranking conjoint analyses, best–worst scaling and discrete choice experiments in a nonhypothetical context. (2019). Costa-Font, Montserrat ; Gil, Jose Maria ; Akaichi, Faical ; Yangui, Ahmed.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:333766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Hypothetical bias and framing effect in the valuation of private consumer goods. (2018). Magdalena, Brzozowicz.
    In: Central European Economic Journal.
    RePEc:vrs:ceuecj:v:5:y:2018:i:52:p:260-269:n:20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Constructing a consumption model of fine dining from the perspective of behavioral economics. (2018). Hsu, Sheng-Hsun ; Tsai, Sang-Bing ; Hsiao, Cheng-Fu.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0194886.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Communicating resourcefully: a natural field experiment on environmental framing and cognitive dissonance in going paperless. (2018). Gosnell, Greer.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:89815.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Communicating Resourcefully: A Natural Field Experiment on Environmental Framing and Cognitive Dissonance in Going Paperless. (2018). Gosnell, Greer K.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:154:y:2018:i:c:p:128-144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. The impact of deal€ proneness on WTP estimates in incentive€ aligned value elicitation methods. (2018). Gao, Zhifeng ; Shi, Lijia ; Xie, Jing.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:49:y:2018:i:3:p:353-362.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Investigating attribute non-attendance effects in conjoint analysis methods performance: Choice experiment, ranking conjoint analysis and best worst scaling.. (2018). Akaichi, Faical ; Gil, J M ; Yangui, A.
    In: 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae18:275989.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. On the use of flexible mixing distributions in WTP space: an induced value choice experiment. (2018). Palma, Marco ; Nayga, Rodolfo ; Bazzani, Claudia.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:aareaj:313581.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Temporal Stability of Stated Preferences: The Case of Junior Nursing Jobs. (2017). Yoo, Hong Il ; Doiron, Denise ; Il, Hong.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:26:y:2017:i:6:p:802-809.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Do anchors hold for real? Anchoring effect and hypothetical bias in declared WTP. (2017). Kusztelak, Przemysław ; Krawczyk, Michal ; Brzozowicz, Magdalena.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:war:wpaper:2017-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Be who you ought or be who you are? Environmental framing and cognitive dissonance in going paperless. (2017). Gosnell, Greer.
    In: GRI Working Papers.
    RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. A Latent Class Nested Logit Model for Rank-Ordered Data with Application to Cork Oak Reforestation. (2017). Yoo, Hong Il ; Oviedo, Jose ; Il, Hong.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:68:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0058-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. The impact of career concerns and cognitive dissonance on bureaucrats’ use of cost-benefit analysis. (2017). Hammes, Johanna Jussila.
    In: Working papers in Transport Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:ctswps:2017_005.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. TESTING COMMITMENT COST THEORY IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS. (2017). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Caputo, Vincenzina ; Canavari, Maurizio ; Bazzani, Claudia.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:55:y:2017:i:1:p:383-396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Enhancing Agent-Based Models with Discrete Choice Experiments. (2016). Holm, Stefan ; Lemm, Renato ; Thees, Oliver ; Hilty, Lorenz M.
    In: Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation.
    RePEc:jas:jasssj:2015-101-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Testing convergent validity in choice experiments: Application to public recreation in Spanish stone pine and cork oak forests. (2016). Oviedo, Jose ; Campos, Pablo ; Ruiz-Gauna, Itziar ; Caparros, Alejandro.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:25:y:2016:i:c:p:130-148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. On the Use of the BDM Mechanism in Non-Hypothetical Choice Experiments. (2016). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Caputo, Vincenzina ; Canavari, Maurizio ; Bazzani, Claudia ; Danforth, Diana M.
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts.
    RePEc:ags:aaea16:235904.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Testing convergent validity in choice experiments: application to public recreation in Spanish Stone pine and Cork oak forests. (2015). Oviedo, Jose ; Campos, Pablo ; Ruiz-Gauna, Itziar ; Caparros, Alejandro.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ipp:wpaper:1504.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Information and visual attention in contingent valuation and choice modeling: field and eye-tracking experiments applied to reforestations in Spain. (2015). Oviedo, Jose ; Caparros, Alejandro.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:4:p:185-204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Are ranking preferences information methods comparable with the choice experiment information in predicting actual behavior?. (2014). Akaichi, Faical ; Costa-Font, Montserrat ; Gil, Jose Maria.
    In: 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
    RePEc:ags:eaae14:182672.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Do experimental protocols in Conjoint Analysis matter in non Hypothetical settings?. (2014). Akaichi, Faical ; Costa-Font, M. ; Gil, J. M. ; Yangui, A..
    In: 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France.
    RePEc:ags:aesc14:170345.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Willingness to pay for environmental attributes of non-food agricultural products: a real choice experiment. (2012). Joly, Iragaël ; Llerena, D. ; Michaud, C..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gbl:wpaper:201201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Testing for hypothetical bias in willingness to support a reforestation program. (2012). Krawczyk, Michal.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:18:y:2012:i:4:p:282-289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Consumers (Dis)Preference for Bitterness in Extra Virgin Olive Oil: A Field Experiment. (2011). Caracciolo, Francesco ; Cicia, Gianni ; Vecchio, Riccardo ; Panico, Teresa ; del Giudice, Teresa ; Cavallo, Carla.
    In: International Journal on Food System Dynamics.
    RePEc:ags:ijofsd:345547.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. THE ROLE OF PRODUCTION METHODS IN FRUIT PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR: HYPOTHETICAL VS ACTUAL CONSUMERS’ PREFERENCES AND STATED MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. (2010). Notaro, Sandra ; Raffaelli, Roberta ; Moser, Riccarda .
    In: 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
    RePEc:ags:eaa115:116426.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Consumers’ willingness to pay for food safety: the case of mycotoxins in milk. (2010). Sckokai, Paolo ; Cuomo, Enrica ; Moro, Daniele.
    In: 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
    RePEc:ags:eaa115:116411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-30 21:10:50 || Missing content? Let us know