create a website

The Effects of Urban Consumer Perceptions on Attitudes for Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods. (2005). Harrison, R Wes ; Han, Jae-Hwan.
In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27720.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 20

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Factors Influencing Urban Consumers Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods. (2007). Harrison, R Wes ; Han, Jae-Hwan.
    In: Review of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:oup:revage:v:29:y:2007:i:4:p:700-719..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Baker, G. A. and T. A. Burnham. 2001. Consumer Response to Genetically Modffied Foods: Market Segment Analysis and Implications for Producers and Policy Makers. Journal ofAgricultural and Resource Economics 26(2):387-403.

  2. Dillman, D. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Douthitt, R. 1990. Biotechnology and Consumer Choice in the Market Place: Should There Be Mandatory Labeling? A Case Study of Bovine 38 July2005 Journal of Food Distribution Research 36(2) Somatotropin and Wisconsin Dairy Products. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Research in the Consumer Interest, Snowbird, UT, August 9-il.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Fishbein M. and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Hallman, W. K. and J. Metcalfe. 1995. Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnology: A Survey of New Jersey Residents. Ecosystem Policy Research Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Harrison, R. W. and E. Mclennon. 2004. Analysis of Consumer Preferences for Biotech Labeling Formats. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(l):159-171.

  7. Hine, S. and M.L. Loureiro. 2002. Understanding Consumers Perceptions toward Biotechnology and Labeling. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA, July 28-31.

  8. Hoban, T. J. and P. A. Kendal. 1992. Consumer Attitudes about the Use of Biotechnology in Agriculture and Food Production. Working Paper, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Huffman, W., M. Rousu, J. F. Shogren, and A. Tegene. 2002. Should the United States Regulate Mandatory Labeling for Genetically Modified Foods? Staff Working Paper 02013. Ames, IA: Iowa State University, Department of Economics. International Food Information Council (IFIC).

  10. Jaccard J. and C. K. Wan. 1996. LISR EL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Kelley, J. 1995. Public Perceptions of Genetic Engineering: Australia, 1994. Working paper, Department of Industry, Science, and Technology, Commonwealth of Australia.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Lusk, J. L. and J. A. Fox. 2002. Consumer Demand for Mandatory Labeling of Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn. Journal ofAgriculture andApplied Economics 34(l):27-38.

  13. Lusk, J. L., J. Roosen, and J. A. Fox. 2003. Demand for Beef form Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(i):i6-29.

  14. Moon, W. and S. K. Balasubramanian. 2001. Public Perceptions and Willingness-To-Pay A Premium for Non-GM Foods in the US and UK. AgBioForum 4(3&4): 221-231.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Moon, W. and S. K. Balasubramanian. 2004. Public Attitudes toward Agrobiotechnology: The Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions on the Impact of Trust, Awareness, and Outrage. Review of Agricultural Economics 26(2): 186-208.

  16. Naoya, K. andW. S. Chern. 2003. ConsumerAcceptance of Genetically Modified Foods: A Telephone Survey. A Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics AssociationAnnual Meeting, Montreal, Canada, July 27-30.

  17. Rousu, M., W. E. Huffman, J. F. Shogren, and A. Tegene. 2002. The Value of Verifiable Information in a Controversial Market: Evidence from Lab Auctions of Genetically Modified Foods. Staff Working Paper #02003. Ames, IA: Iowa State University, Department of Economics, February.

  18. Teisi, M. F., L. Garner, B. Roe, and M. E. Vayda. 2003. Labeling Genetically Modified Foods: How Do US Consumers Want to See It Done? AgBioForum 6(3&4):48-54.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. United States Census: Demographic Profiles. 2000. http://censtats .census.gov/cgi-bin/pct/ pctProfile.pl. Accessed May 2, 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. USDA- ERS. 1991. Economic Issues inAgricultural Biotechnology. Washington, D,C,: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pub. No. AIB 762.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Comparing Perceptions of Biotechnology in Fresh versus Processed Foods: A Cross-Cultural Study. (2013). House, Lisa ; Kim, Hye Young.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:149733.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Consumer Interest in Environmentally Beneficial Chicken Feeds: Comparing High Available Phosphorus Corn and Other Varieties. (2011). Bernard, John ; Gupta, Meeta ; Pesek, John D..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:117945.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Parents Preferences for Health Labels on Foods for Children. (2011). Grebitus, Carola ; Colson, Gregory.
    In: 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland.
    RePEc:ags:eaae11:114284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. An assessment of consumer preference for fair trade coffee in Toronto and Vancouver. (2010). Cranfield, John ; Henson, Spencer ; Masakure, Oliver ; Northey, James .
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:26:y:2010:i:2:p:307-325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Explaining organic food choice on the basis of socio-demographics. A study in Portugal and Germany. (2010). Marreiros, Cristina ; Lucas, Maria Raquel ; Rohrich, Kerstin.
    In: CEFAGE-UE Working Papers.
    RePEc:cfe:wpcefa:2010_03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Consumer preference for production-derived quality: analyzing perceptions of premium chicken production methods. (2009). Cranfield, John ; Innes, Brian.
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:25:y:2009:i:3:p:395-411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Does altruism play a role in determining U.S. consumer preferences and willingness to pay for natural and regionally produced beef?. (2009). Umberger, Wendy ; Thilmany, Dawn ; Dawn D. Thilmany McFadden, ; Smith, Amanda R..
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:25:y:2009:i:2:p:268-285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Acceptance of biotechnology and social-cultural implications in Ghana. (2009). Yawson, Robert ; Quaye, Wilhemina ; Williams, Irene E..
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:33237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Research: Are We Valuing the Right Stuff?. (2009). Brorsen, B.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:50079.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Consumer preferences for ground beef packaged under a modified atmosphere. (2009). Roosen, Jutta ; Jensen, Helen ; Grebitus, Carola ; Anders, Sven ; Sebranek, Joseph G..
    In: 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China.
    RePEc:ags:iaae09:51649.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The Impact Of Socio-Demographic Factors And Political Perceptions On Consumer Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Foods: An Econometric Investigation. (2009). Antonopoulou, Lina ; Papadas, Christos ; Targoutzidis, Antonis.
    In: Agricultural Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:aergaa:58062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Understanding consumer interest in product and process-based attributes for fresh produce. (2008). Thilmany, Dawn ; Bond, Jennifer Keeling.
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:24:y:2008:i:2:p:231-252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Public approval of plant and animal biotechnology in South Korea: an ordered probit analysis. (2008). Govindasamy, Ramu ; Puduri, Venkata ; Jang, Ho-Min ; Onyango, Benjamin ; Hallman, William K..
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:24:y:2008:i:1:p:102-118.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A stakeholder approach to investigating public perception and attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology in Ghana. (2008). Yawson, Robert ; Quaye, Wilhemina ; Williams, Irene E..
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:34924.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. What to Choose? The Value of Label Claims to Fresh Produce Consumers. (2008). Thilmany, Dawn ; Bond, Jennifer Keeling.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:46559.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Unobserved heterogeneity in the wine market: an analysis on Sardinian wine via Mixed Logit. (2008). Del Giudice, Teresa ; Lai, Maria Bonaria ; Pomarici, Eugenio.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:aawewp:45502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Consumer preferences for extra virgin olive oil with country-of-origin and geographical indication labels in Canada. (2008). Menapace, Luisa ; Grebitus, Carola ; Colson, Gregory ; Facendola, Maria .
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6430.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified tomatoes. (2007). Wright, Natasha R. ; Bukenya, James O..
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:23:y:2007:i:1:p:117-130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Some Problems in Estimating Willingness to Pay with Contingent Valuation Surveys: Case for Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food. (2007). Chern, Wen S. ; Kaneko, Naoya.
    In: 2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama.
    RePEc:ags:saeasm:34852.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. DIMENSIONEN DER VERBRAUCHERRESONANZ BEI DER NEUPRODUKTBEURTEILUNG VON LEBENSMITTELN (German). (2007). Menrad, Klaus ; Sparke, Kai.
    In: 47th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 26-28, 2007.
    RePEc:ags:gewi07:7611.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Consumer attitudes toward GM food with hypothetical functional characteristics. (2007). Notaro, Sandra ; Marin, Floriana.
    In: 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:eaa105:7878.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A Mixture Model of Consumers Intended Purchase Decisions for Genetically Modified Foods. (2006). Mittelhammer, Ron C. ; Grimsrud, Kristine M..
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2006:i:23:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Consumer Valuation of the Second Generation of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods with Benefits Disclosure. (2006). Harrison, R Wes ; Han, Jae-Hwan.
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:saeaso:35277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The Relative Importance of Preferences for Country-of-Origin in China, France, Niger and the United States. (2006). Tanner Ehmke, Mariah ; Lusk, Jayson ; Tyner, Wallace.
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae06:25408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Identification of Consumer Segments and Its Implication on the Willingness-to-Pay Distribution: The Case of Demand for Non-Genetically Modified Vegetable Oil in the United States. (2006). Chern, Wen S. ; Kaneko, Naoya.
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Oil, Cornflakes, and Salmon: Evidence from a U.S. Telephone Survey. (2005). Chern, Wen S. ; Kaneko, Naoya.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:43504.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. A Cluster Analysis of Natural Beef Product Consumers by Shopping Behavior, Importance of Production Attributes, and Demographics. (2005). Umberger, Wendy ; Thilmany, Dawn ; Ziehl, Amanda .
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:26757.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A Meta-Analysis of Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies. (2005). Lusk, Jayson ; Jamal, Mustafa ; Roucan, Maud ; Taulman, Lesley ; Kurlander, Lauren .
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30782.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Who Should Certify the Safety of Genetically Modified Foods?. (2005). Mazzocco, Michael ; Baker, Gregory.
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:8157.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods in Taiwan: Is Positive Discount the Same as Negative Premium?. (2005). Chern, Wen S. ; Kaneko, Naoya.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19491.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. PUBLIC APPROVAL OF PLANT AND ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY IN KOREA: AN ORDERED PROBIT ANALYSIS. (2004). Govindasamy, Ramu ; Hallman, William ; Puduri, Venkata ; Jang, Ho-Min ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS IN KOREA: FACTOR AND CLUSTER ANALYSIS. (2004). Govindasamy, Ramu ; Hallman, William ; Puduri, Venkata S. ; Jang, Ho-Min ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18179.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: THE ROLE OF PRODUCT BENEFITS AND PERCEIVED RISKS. (2004). Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Consumer Acceptance of Nutritionally Enhanced Genetically Modified Food: Relevance of Gene Transfer Technology. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Onyango, Benjamin M..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30919.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Identification of Niche Market for Hanwoo Beef: Understanding Korean Consumer Preference for Beef using Market Segment Analysis. (2004). Kim, Renee ; Boyd, Milton.
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:8152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Willingness-to-Accept and Willingness-to-Pay for GM and Non-GM Food: UK Consumers. (2004). Moon, Wanki ; Balasubramanian, Siva K. ; Rimal, Arbindra.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. AGRICULTURAL INPUT MARKET SEGMENTS: WHO IS BUYING?. (2004). Wilson, Christine ; Foley, Daniel.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19997.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: ROLE OF PRODUCT BENEFITS AND PERCEIVED RISKS. (2003). Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. NUTRITIONAL BENEFITS AND CONSUMER WILLINGNESS TO BUY GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS. (2003). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27934.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. CONSUMER PREFERENCES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR FOOD LABELING: A DISCUSSION OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES. (2003). McCluskey, Jill ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27051.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. COUNTRY-OF-ORIGIN LABELING OF BEEF PRODUCTS: U.S. CONSUMERS PERCEPTIONS. (2003). Umberger, Wendy ; FEUZ, Dillon M. ; Calkins, Chris R. ; Sitz, Bethany M..
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27050.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD. (2003). Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food Products in the Developing World. (2003). Wahl, Thomas ; McCluskey, Jill ; Curtis, Kynda.
    In: 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare03:57858.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. MARKET SEGMENTATION WITHIN CONTINGENT VALUATION. (2003). Mittelhammer, Ron ; Grimsrud, Kristine.
    In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
    RePEc:ags:aaea03:22108.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. A RISK PERCEPTION ANALYSIS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS BASED ON STATED PREFERENCES. (2003). Loureiro, Maria ; Bugbee, Marcia .
    In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
    RePEc:ags:aaea03:22017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. CONSUMER RESPONSE TO GMO FOODS: BRANDING, CERTIFICATION, AND CONSUMER CHARACTERISTICS. (2002). Mazzocco, Michael A. ; Baker, Gregory.
    In: 2002 Annual Meeting, July 28-31, 2002, Long Beach, California.
    RePEc:ags:waealb:36562.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18185.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. UNCOVERING FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY: WILLINGNESS TO BUY GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD PRODUCTS. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARDS GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS IN NORWAY. (2002). Wahl, Thomas ; McCluskey, Jill ; Loureiro, Maria ; Grimsrud, Kristine.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19818.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-25 16:36:08 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.