1. Valuing environmental damage remediation and liability using value estimates for ecosystem services. (2016). O'Shea, Robert ; Bullock, Craig.
   In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
   RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:59:y:2016:i:9:p:1711-1727.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. ADAMOWICZ, W., LOUVIERE, J., WILLIAMS, M., 1994. “Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp 271 – 292.

2. BAKER, B., METCALFE, P., BUTLER, S., GUERON, Y., SHELDON, R. and J. EAST, 2007. The benefits of Water Framework Directive programmes of measures in England and Wales, A Final Report to DEFRA re CRP Project 4b/c. NERA Economic Consulting and Accent.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

3. BATEMAN, I. J., CARSON, R. T., DAY, B., HANEMANN, M., HANLEY, N., HETT, T., JONES-LEE, M., LOOMES, G., MOURATO, S., ÖZDEMIROGLU, E., PEARCE, D. W., SUGDEN, R., SWANSON, J., 2002. Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

4. BEN-AKIVA, M. and LERMAN, S., 1985. Discrete choice analysis: theory and applications to travel demand, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. BIROL, E., K. KAROUSAKIS and P. KOUNDOURI, 2006. “Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: A survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 365, pp 105–122.

6. BLIEMER, M.C.J. and J. M. ROSE, 2006. “Designing stated choice experiments: state-of-the-art”, Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, August 2006.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. BROUWER, R., 2006. “Do stated preference methods stand the test of time? A test of the stability of contingent values and models for health risks when facing an extreme event”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 60, pp 399 – 406.

8. BROUWER, R.J., J. MARTIN-ORTEGA, and J. BERBEL, 2010. “Spatial preference heterogeneity: a choice experiment”, Land Economics, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp 552 – 568.

9. BULLOCK, C., C. KRETSCH and E. CANDON, 2008. Benefits and Costs of Biodiversity in Ireland, Report to Government of Ireland.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. CAMPBELL, D., 2006. Discrete choice experiments applied to the valuation of rural environment landscape improvements, PhD Thesis, Queen’s University Belfast.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

11. CARLSSON, F., FRYKBLOM, P. and C.J., LAGERKVIST, C.J., 2005. “Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments”, Economics Letters, Vol. 89, pp 147 – 152.

12. CDM, 2004. Economic analysis of water use in Ireland, Final report, Camp Dresser & McKee (Ireland) Ltd in association with Compass Informatics Ltd, DTZ Pieda Consulting, FitzGerald Communications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. CUMMINGS, R.G. and L.O. TAYLOR, 1999. “Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method”, American Economic Review, Vol. 89, pp 649 – 65.

14. CURTIS, J.A., 2002. “Estimating the demand for salmon angling in Ireland”, Economic and Social Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp 319 – 332.

15. CURTIS, J.A., 2003. “Demand for water-based leisure activity”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp 65 – 77.

16. DKM Economic Consultants Ltd, Aquavarra Research Ltd and ESRI, 2004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Economic evaluation of water supply and waste water projects, cost-benefit analysis methodology paper, Final report, DUBLIN. EFTEC, 2008. Comparing the Results of Economic Valuation Studies – the case of using stated preference techniques for valuing improvements to the water environment, Briefing May 2008, UK.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
18. Framework Directive: are benefits transferable?”, European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp 391 – 413. HANLEY, N. and A. BLACK, 2006c. “Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Water Framework Directive in Scotland”, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp 156 – 165.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
19. GOODBODY Economic Consultants, 2008. Review of water resource benefit values, Report draft copy August 2008, Dublin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
20. GREENE, W.H., 2002. NLOGIT Version 4.0: user’s guide. Econometric Software, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. HANEMANN, W.M., 1984. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiment with Discrete Responses”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp 332 – 341.

22. HANLEY, N., ADAMOWICZ, W. and R.E. WRIGHT, 2005. “Price vector effects in choice experiments: an empirical test”, Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 27, pp 227 – 234.

23. HANLEY, N., COLOMBO, S., MUSHARRAFIYEH, H., 2007. Manchester ship canal: water quality improvement project economic analysis of values for environmental improvements, Report of the Environmental Economics Research Group, Department of Economics, University of Stirling.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
24. HANLEY, N., WRIGHT, R.E., ALVAREZ – FARIZO, B., 2006a. “Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 78, pp 183 – 193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

25. HAUSMAN, J. and D.L. McFadden, 1984. “Specification tests for the multinomial logit model”, Econometrica, Vol. 52, pp 1219 – 1240.

26. HENSHER, D.A. and W.H. GREENE, 2003. “The mixed logit model: the state of practice”, Transportation, Vol. 30, pp 133 – 76.

27. HYNES, S. and N. HANLEY, 2006. “Preservation versus development on Irish rivers: whitewater kayaking and hydro power in Ireland”, Land Use Policy Journal, Vol.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

28. HYNES, S., CAMPBELL, D. and P. HOWLEY, 2011. “A Holistic vs. an Attributebased Approach to Agri-Environmental Policy Valuation: Do Welfare Estimates Differ?”, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp 305–329.

29. HYNES, S., HANLEY, N. and C. O’ DONOGHUE, 2009. “Alternative treatments of the cost of time in recreational demand models: an application to whitewater kayaking in Ireland”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp 1014 – 1021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. INDECON, 2003. An economic/socio economic evaluation of wild salmon in Ireland, Submitted to the Central Fisheries Board, Dublin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
31. KALLIS, G. and D. BUTLER, 2001. “The EU water framework directive: measures and implications”, Water Policy, Vol. 3, pp 125 – 142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

32. KATARIA, M., 2009. “Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers”, Energy Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp 69 – 76.

33. KATARIA, M., HASLER, B., NISSEN, C.J., CHRISTENSEN, T., MARTINSEN, L., LADENBURG, J., LEVIN, G., DUBGAARD, A., BATEMAN, I.J. and S. HIME, S., 2009. “Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments: evidence from a study on implementation of the European Water Framework Directive in Denmark”, Paper presented at the EAERE 17th Annual Conference, 24 - 27 June 2009, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. LAGO, M. and K. Glenk, 2008. “Delivering good status in Scotland: using choice experiments for the estimation of non-market benefits of the EC Water Framework Directive”, Unpublished Working Paper, UK: Macaulay Land Use Research Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

35. LAWLOR, J., McCARTHY, C., SCOTT, S., 2007. “Investment in water infrastructure: findings from an economic analysis of a national programme”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp 41 – 63.

36. LUCE, R.D., 1959. Individual Choice Behaviour: a Theoretical Analysis, New York: Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. McFADDEN, D.L. and K.E. TRAIN, 2000. “Mixed MNL models for discrete response”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 15, pp 447 – 470.

38. McFADDEN, D.L., 1974. “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour”, in Zarembka, P. (ed.), Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
39. MCOS (2002) Three Rivers Project Final Report: Water monitoring and management systems in the Boyne, Liffey and Suir catchments in Ireland M.C. O’Sullivan Consulting Engineers, Dun Laoghaire, Co.Dublin, Ireland. (Now part of RPS Ireland).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. POIRIER J. and A. FLEURET, 2010. “Using the choice experiment method for valuing improvements in water quality: a simultaneous application to four recreation sites of a river basin”, Paper presented in 59th Conference of Association Française de Science Economique, 9-10 September 2010, Nanterre Université.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. REVER, D. and K.E. TRAIN, 2000. “Mixed logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 80, pp 647 – 657.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

42. SPASH, C.L., URAMA, K., BURTON, R., KENYON, W., SHANNON, P., HILL, G., 2009. “Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics, ethics and social psychology”, Ecological Economics, Vol.

43. WILLIAMS, J. and B. RYAN, 2004. Participation in marine-based leisure activities in Ireland, ESRI report to the Marine Institute, Dublin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Changing with the Tide: Semiparametric Estimation of Preference Dynamics. (2014). Koster, Paul ; Dekker, Thijs ; Brouwer, Roy.
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:i:4:p:717-745.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The impact of policy elements on the financing costs of RE investment: The case of wind power in Germany. (2011). Giebel, Olaf ; Breitschopf, Barbara.
   In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
   RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s112011.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Estimating the Value of Achieving ‘Good Ecological Status’ under the Water Framework Directive in the Boyne River Catchment: A Mixed Multinomial Logit Approach. (2011). Hynes, Stephen ; Hanley, Nick ; Campbell, Danny ; Stithou, Mavra.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:ags:semrui:148928.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Consumers’ Stated Choices versus Purchasing Desires: Case of Hawaii Food Baskets. (2009). Hu, Wuyang ; Cox, Linda.
   In: Agricultural Economics Review.
   RePEc:ags:aergaa:56632.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Testing Different Types of Benefit Transfer in Valuation of Ecosystem Services: New Zealand Winegrowing Case Studies. (2009). Cullen, Ross ; Colombo, Sergio ; Baskaran, Ramesh.
   In: 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
   RePEc:ags:aare09:48189.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Alternative Approaches to Incorporating the Opportunity Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Models. (2008). Crooker, John ; Azevedo, Christopher.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:umn:wpaper:0803.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Natural disturbances and natural hazards in mountain forests: a framework for the economic valuation. (2008). Notaro, Sandra ; Paletto, Alessandro.
   In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
   RePEc:trn:utwpde:0808.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose ; Kilkuwe, Enoch.
   In: IFPRI discussion papers.
   RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science. (2007). Whitehead, John ; Pattanayak, Subhrendu ; Van Houtven, George L. ; Gelso, Brett R..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:05-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources?. (2006). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
    RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:25:y:2006:i:4:p:855-874.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Using Expert Judgment to Assess Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change: Evidence From a Conjoint Choice Survey. (2006). Chiabai, Aline ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. DOES THE CONSUMERS VARIETY-SEEKING BEHAVIOR CONDITION THE WILLINGNESS TO TRAVEL FURTHER?. (2006). Nicolau, Juan.
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale. (2006). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. (2005). Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Bech, Mickael.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:10:p:1079-1083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Public Preferences for Land usesÂ’ changes - valuing urban regeneration projects at the Venice Arsenale. (2005). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand. (2005). Herriges, Joseph ; Jeon, Yongsik.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:12473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). (2004). Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:909-912.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. (2004). Savage, Elizabeth ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:901-907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Time is Money: Improved Valuation of Time and Transportation Costs. (2004). Earnhart, Dietrich.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:159-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Altruism and the Economic Values of Environmental and Social Policies. (2004). Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:233-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. A RANDOM PARAMETER LOGIT APPROACH TO THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAYS AND LENGTH OF STAY. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare - transportation of farm animals to slaughter versus the use of mobile abattoirs. (2004). Lagerkvist, Carl-Johan ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Frykblom, Peter .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Heterogeneous preferences for marine amenities: A choice experiment applied to water quality. (2004). Eggert, Håkan ; Olsson, Bjorn .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Experience, Expectations and Hindsight: Evidence of a Cognitive Wedge in Stated Preference Retrospectives. (2004). Bishop, Richard ; Bennett, Michael ; Provencher, Bill.
    In: Staff Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:wisagr:468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A choice modelling approach to investigate biases in individual and aggregated benefit estimates due to omission of distance. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Effects of distance on non-use values. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Curbside Recycling: Waste Resource or Waste of Resources?. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0310001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Cheap Talk Revisited: New Evidence from CVM. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0301001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48. (2002). Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:her:chedps:48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. A COMPARISON OF STATED AND REVEALED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. (2002). Hicks, Robert.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. (2001). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. LOGIT MODELS FOR POOLED CONTINGENT VALUATION AND CONTINGENT RATING AND RANKING DATA: VALUING BENEFITS FROM FOREST BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION. (2001). Siikamäki, Juha ; Siikamaki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea01:20616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple‐format, stated‐preference approach. (2000). Desvousges, William H. ; JOHNSON, REED F. ; Banzhaf, Melissa Ruby.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:295-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Combining averting behavior and contingent valuation data: an application to drinking water treatment. (2000). Nunes, Luis ; Ducla-Soares, Maria M. ; ROSADO, MARCIA A. ; Cunha-e-Sa, Maria A., .
    In: Nova SBE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Comparing Ranking and Contingent Valuation for Valuing Human Lives, Applying Nested and Non-Nested Logit Models. (2000). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:17:y:2000:i:1:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Binary Choice Valuation Studies with Heteregeneous Preferences Regarding the Program Being Valued. (2000). Huhtala, Anni.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:263-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Preference Structures, Property Rights, and Paired Comparisons. (1999). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:13:y:1999:i:1:p:107-122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. What do doctors want? developing incentives for doctors to serve in Indonesias rural and remote areas. (1998). Widiyarti, ; Ismail, Nusye ; Chomitz, Kenneth M. ; Setiadi, Gunawan ; Azwar, Azrul.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1888.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Willingness to Pay for Quality Improvements: Can Revealed and Stated Preferences Data be Combined?. (1997). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wop:eacaec:9704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Air Quality in Hamilton-Wentworth: A Choice Experiment. (1997). .
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1997-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. (1996). Englin, Jeffrey ; Cameron, Trudy.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:7:y:1996:i:2:p:133-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-30 06:22:36 || Missing content? Let us know