1. Income effects and the inconvenience of private provision of public goods for bads: The case of recycling in Finland. (2010). Huhtala, Anni.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:8:p:1675-1681.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Temporal insensitivity of willingness to pay and implied discount rates. (2009). Haab, Tim ; Kim, Soo-Il .
   In: Resource and Energy Economics.
   RePEc:eee:resene:v:31:y:2009:i:2:p:89-102.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Bid design for non-parametric contingent valuation with a single bounded dichotomous choice format. (2008). Brey, Raul ; Riera, Pere ; Gandara, Guillermo.
   In: Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics.
   RePEc:hpe:journl:y:2008:v:186:i:3:p:43-60.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Modeling Willingness to Pay for Land Conservation Easements: Treatment of Zero and Protest Bids and Application and Policy Implications. (2008). Cho, Seong-Hoon ; Yen, Steven T. ; Bowker, J. M. ; Newman, David H..
   In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
   RePEc:ags:joaaec:45524.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Distribution-free estimation with interval-censored contingent valuation data: troubles with Turnbull?. (2007). Day, Brett.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:37:y:2007:i:4:p:777-795.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Survey protocol and income effects in the contingent valuation of public goods: A meta-analysis. (2006). Schläpfer, Felix.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:57:y:2006:i:3:p:415-429.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Flexible mixture distribution modeling of dichotomous choice contingent valuation with heterogenity. (2005). Araña, Jorge ; Leon, Carmelo J..
   In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
   RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:50:y:2005:i:1:p:170-188.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Consumer versus citizen preferences in contingent valuation: evidence on the role of question framing. (2005). Ovaskainen, Ville ; Kniivila, Matleena.
   In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
   RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:49:y:2005:i:4:p:379-394.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Consumer versus citizen preferences in contingent valuation: evidence on the role of question framing. (2005). Ovaskainen, Ville ; Kniivila, Matleena.
   In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
   RePEc:ags:aareaj:118585.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. A comparison of a parametric and a non-parametric method to value a non-rejectable public good. (2004). Loomis, John ; Loureiro, Maria ; Nahuelhual, Laura.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:10:y:2004:i:2:p:61-74.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Using Random Parameters to Account for Heterogeneous Preferences in Contingent Valuation of Public Open Space. (2004). Loomis, John ; Loureiro, Maria ; Nahuelhual, Laura.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30909.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. A RISK PERCEPTION ANALYSIS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS BASED ON STATED PREFERENCES. (2003). Loureiro, Maria ; Bugbee, Marcia .
    In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
    RePEc:ags:aaea03:22017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. TEMPORAL INSENSITIVITY OF PVWTP AND IMPLIED DISCOUNT RATES IN CVM. (2003). Haab, Tim ; Kim, Soo-Il .
    In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
    RePEc:ags:aaea03:21921.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Adamowicz, W., J. Louviere and M. Williams (1994), ‘Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26, 271-292.

2. Bishop R. C. and T. A. Heberlein (1979), ‘Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61, 926-930.

3. Brown, T. C., P, A. Champ, R. C. Bishop and D. W. McCollum (1996), ‘Which Response Format Reveals the Truth About Donations to a Public Good?’, Land Economics 72, 152-166.

4. Carson, R. T., L. Wilks and I. Imber (1994), ‘Valuing the Preservation of Australias Kakadu Conservation Zone’, Oxford Economic Papers 46, 727-749.

5. Cummings, R. G., G. W. Harrison and E. E. Rutström (1995), ‘Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible?’, American Economic Reviewbf 85, 260-266.

6. Efron, B. (1967), The Two-Sample Problem with Censored Data, Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, month 4, 831-853.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Haab, T. C. and K. E. McConnell (1997), ‘Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32, 251-270.

8. Hanemann, W. M. (1984), ‘Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66, 332-341.

9. Hanemann, W. M. (1989), ‘Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data. Reply’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71, 1057-1061.

10. Hanemann, W. M. and B. Kanninen (1998), ‘The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response Data’, in I. J. Bateman and K. G. Willis, eds., Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC, and Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Huhtala, A. (1994), Is Environmental Guilt a Driving Force? An Economic Study on Recycling. University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Johansson, P., B. Kriström and K. G. Mäler (1989), ‘Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Comment’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71, 1054-1056.

13. Kealy, M. J., M. Montgomery and J. F. Dovido (1990), ‘Reliability and Predictive Validity of Contingent Values: Does the Nature of the Good Matter?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19, 244-263.

14. Krinsky, I. and A. L. Robb (1986), ‘On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities’, Review of Economics and Statistics 68, 715-719.

15. Kriström, B. (1997), ‘Spike Models in Contingent Valuation’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79, 1013-1023.

16. Pindyck, R. S. and D. L. Rubinfield (1976), Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. McGraw-Hill, Tokyo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
17. Turnbull, B. W. (1974), ‘Nonparametric Estimation of a Survivorship Function with Doubly Censored Data’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 69, 169-173.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Changing with the Tide: Semiparametric Estimation of Preference Dynamics. (2014). Koster, Paul ; Dekker, Thijs ; Brouwer, Roy.
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:i:4:p:717-745.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The impact of policy elements on the financing costs of RE investment: The case of wind power in Germany. (2011). Giebel, Olaf ; Breitschopf, Barbara.
   In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
   RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s112011.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Estimating the Value of Achieving ‘Good Ecological Status’ under the Water Framework Directive in the Boyne River Catchment: A Mixed Multinomial Logit Approach. (2011). Hynes, Stephen ; Hanley, Nick ; Campbell, Danny ; Stithou, Mavra.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:ags:semrui:148928.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Consumers’ Stated Choices versus Purchasing Desires: Case of Hawaii Food Baskets. (2009). Hu, Wuyang ; Cox, Linda.
   In: Agricultural Economics Review.
   RePEc:ags:aergaa:56632.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Testing Different Types of Benefit Transfer in Valuation of Ecosystem Services: New Zealand Winegrowing Case Studies. (2009). Cullen, Ross ; Colombo, Sergio ; Baskaran, Ramesh.
   In: 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
   RePEc:ags:aare09:48189.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Alternative Approaches to Incorporating the Opportunity Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Models. (2008). Crooker, John ; Azevedo, Christopher.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:umn:wpaper:0803.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Natural disturbances and natural hazards in mountain forests: a framework for the economic valuation. (2008). Notaro, Sandra ; Paletto, Alessandro.
   In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
   RePEc:trn:utwpde:0808.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose ; Kilkuwe, Enoch.
   In: IFPRI discussion papers.
   RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science. (2007). Whitehead, John ; Pattanayak, Subhrendu ; Van Houtven, George L. ; Gelso, Brett R..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:05-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources?. (2006). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
    RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:25:y:2006:i:4:p:855-874.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Using Expert Judgment to Assess Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change: Evidence From a Conjoint Choice Survey. (2006). Chiabai, Aline ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. DOES THE CONSUMERS VARIETY-SEEKING BEHAVIOR CONDITION THE WILLINGNESS TO TRAVEL FURTHER?. (2006). Nicolau, Juan.
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale. (2006). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. (2005). Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Bech, Mickael.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:10:p:1079-1083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Public Preferences for Land usesÂ’ changes - valuing urban regeneration projects at the Venice Arsenale. (2005). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand. (2005). Herriges, Joseph ; Jeon, Yongsik.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:12473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). (2004). Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:909-912.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. (2004). Savage, Elizabeth ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:901-907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Time is Money: Improved Valuation of Time and Transportation Costs. (2004). Earnhart, Dietrich.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:159-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Altruism and the Economic Values of Environmental and Social Policies. (2004). Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:233-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. A RANDOM PARAMETER LOGIT APPROACH TO THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAYS AND LENGTH OF STAY. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare - transportation of farm animals to slaughter versus the use of mobile abattoirs. (2004). Lagerkvist, Carl-Johan ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Frykblom, Peter .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Heterogeneous preferences for marine amenities: A choice experiment applied to water quality. (2004). Eggert, Håkan ; Olsson, Bjorn .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Experience, Expectations and Hindsight: Evidence of a Cognitive Wedge in Stated Preference Retrospectives. (2004). Bishop, Richard ; Bennett, Michael ; Provencher, Bill.
    In: Staff Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:wisagr:468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A choice modelling approach to investigate biases in individual and aggregated benefit estimates due to omission of distance. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Effects of distance on non-use values. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Curbside Recycling: Waste Resource or Waste of Resources?. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0310001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Cheap Talk Revisited: New Evidence from CVM. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0301001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48. (2002). Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:her:chedps:48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. A COMPARISON OF STATED AND REVEALED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. (2002). Hicks, Robert.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. (2001). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. LOGIT MODELS FOR POOLED CONTINGENT VALUATION AND CONTINGENT RATING AND RANKING DATA: VALUING BENEFITS FROM FOREST BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION. (2001). Siikamäki, Juha ; Siikamaki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea01:20616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple‐format, stated‐preference approach. (2000). Desvousges, William H. ; JOHNSON, REED F. ; Banzhaf, Melissa Ruby.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:295-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Combining averting behavior and contingent valuation data: an application to drinking water treatment. (2000). Nunes, Luis ; Ducla-Soares, Maria M. ; ROSADO, MARCIA A. ; Cunha-e-Sa, Maria A., .
    In: Nova SBE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Comparing Ranking and Contingent Valuation for Valuing Human Lives, Applying Nested and Non-Nested Logit Models. (2000). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:17:y:2000:i:1:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Binary Choice Valuation Studies with Heteregeneous Preferences Regarding the Program Being Valued. (2000). Huhtala, Anni.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:263-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Preference Structures, Property Rights, and Paired Comparisons. (1999). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:13:y:1999:i:1:p:107-122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. What do doctors want? developing incentives for doctors to serve in Indonesias rural and remote areas. (1998). Widiyarti, ; Ismail, Nusye ; Chomitz, Kenneth M. ; Setiadi, Gunawan ; Azwar, Azrul.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1888.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Willingness to Pay for Quality Improvements: Can Revealed and Stated Preferences Data be Combined?. (1997). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wop:eacaec:9704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Air Quality in Hamilton-Wentworth: A Choice Experiment. (1997). .
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1997-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. (1996). Englin, Jeffrey ; Cameron, Trudy.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:7:y:1996:i:2:p:133-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-06 03:44:37 || Missing content? Let us know