1. Willingness to accept for rewilding farmland in environmentally sensitive areas. (2022). Granado-Diaz, Ruben ; Gomez-Limon, Jose A ; Villanueva, Anastasio J.
   In: Land Use Policy.
   RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:116:y:2022:i:c:s0264837722000795.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Comparison of the price adjustment program and subsidy scheme in Japan: Evaluation of domestic sugar support policy to internalize positive externalities. (2022). Watanabe, Masahide ; Fujimoto, Takashi.
   In: Japan and the World Economy.
   RePEc:eee:japwor:v:61:y:2022:i:c:s0922142522000044.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Heterogeneity in willingness to pay for the location of offshore wind power development: An application of the willingness to pay space model. (2022). Ladenburg, Jacob ; Skotte, Maria.
   In: Energy.
   RePEc:eee:energy:v:241:y:2022:i:c:s0360544221031492.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. $$\lambda $$ λ envy-free pricing for impure public good. (2021). Managi, Shunsuke ; Obara, Takuya ; Tsugawa, Shuichi.
   In: Economic Theory Bulletin.
   RePEc:spr:etbull:v:9:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s40505-020-00191-8.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Willingness to pay for long-term home care services: Evidence from a stated preferences analysis. (2020). Ladenburg, Jacob ; Amilon, Anna ; Ostergaard, Stine Vernstrom ; Siren, Anu.
   In: The Journal of the Economics of Ageing.
   RePEc:eee:joecag:v:17:y:2020:i:c:s2212828x20300037.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Limits to Substitution Between Ecosystem Services and Manufactured Goods and Implications for Social Discounting. (2018). Drupp, Moritz.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:69:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0068-5.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Environmental attitudes and preferences for coastal zone improvements. (2018). HALKOS, GEORGE ; Matsiori, Steriani.
   In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
   RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:58:y:2018:i:c:p:153-166.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Exploring social values for marine protected areas: The case of Mediterranean monk seal. (2017). HALKOS, GEORGE ; Matsiori, Steriani ; Dritsas, Sophoclis.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:82490.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Estimating recreational values of coastal zones. (2017). HALKOS, GEORGE ; Matsiori, Steriani.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:80911.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. The Monetary Valuation of Lifetime Health Improvement and Life Expectancy Gains in Turkey. (2017). Ara, Shihomi ; Tekein, Cem.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:10:p:1151-:d:113731.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Income inequality and willingness to pay for environmental public goods. (2017). Quaas, Martin ; Drupp, Moritz ; Baumgärtner, Stefan ; Meya, Jasper N ; Munz, Jan M ; Baumgartner, Stefan.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:85:y:2017:i:c:p:35-61.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Limits to substitution between ecosystem services and manufactured goods and implications for social discounting. (2016). Drupp, Moritz.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:cauewp:201605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Evaluation of individuals’ intention to pay a premium price for ecotourism: An exploratory study. (2016). pulina, manuela ; Meleddu, Marta.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:65:y:2016:i:c:p:67-78.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Incorporating Environmental Externalities in Total Factor Productivity Analysis: The Case of Soil Erosion in Nigerian Agriculture. (2015). Chuku, Chuku.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:68165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Ramsey Discounting of Ecosystem Services. (2015). Baumgärtner, Stefan ; Baumgartner, Stefan ; Winkler, Klara ; Thiel, Denise ; Klein, Alexandra.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:61:y:2015:i:2:p:273-296.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Understanding how income influences willingness to pay for joint programs: A more equitable value measure for the less wealthy. (2015). Breffle, William S. ; Eiswerth, Mark E. ; Thornton, Jeffrey ; Muralidharan, Daya .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:109:y:2015:i:c:p:17-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Is the environment a luxury? An empirical investigation using revealed preferences and household production. (2014). Tiezzi, Silvia ; Martini, Chiara.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:37:y:2014:i:c:p:147-167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Investigating fishers preferences for the design of marine Payments for Environmental Services schemes. (2014). Mourato, Susana ; Barr, Rhona F..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:108:y:2014:i:c:p:91-103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Meta-regression analysis of the impact of agricultural subsidies on farm technical efficiency. (2014). Latruffe, Laure ; Minviel, Jean Joseph.
    In: 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
    RePEc:ags:eaae14:182767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Understanding the consequences of consequentiality: Testing the validity of stated preferences in the field. (2013). Vossler, Christian ; Watson, Sharon B..
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:86:y:2013:i:c:p:137-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. The effects of current income and expected change in future income on stated preferences for environmental improvements. (2013). Thorsen, Bo ; Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark ; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:19:y:2013:i:2:p:206-219.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation a threatened theory? A meta-analysis of the literature. (2013). Motel Combes, Pascale ; Dakpo, K ; Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:90:y:2013:i:c:p:19-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Valuation of species and nature conservation in Asia and Oceania: a meta-analysis. (2012). TRAN, TUAN ; Lindhjem, Henrik ; Tuan, Tran.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:1-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Understanding the consequences of consequentiality: Testing the validity of stated preferences in the field. (2012). Vossler, Christian ; Watson, Sharon.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:48109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Assessing the economic value of protecting artificial lakes. (2012). HALKOS, GEORGE.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:39557.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Investigating fishers� preferences for the design of marine Payments for Environmental Services schemes. (2012). Mourato, Susana ; Barr, Rhona .
    In: GRI Working Papers.
    RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp101.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. The environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a threatened theory? A meta-analysis. (2012). Motel Combes, Pascale ; Dakpo, K ; Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00691863.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. The environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a threatened theory? A meta-analysis. (2012). Motel Combes, Pascale ; Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna ; Dakpo, Herve K.
    In: CERDI Working papers.
    RePEc:hal:cdiwps:halshs-00691863.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Determinants of willingness to pay for coastal zone quality improvement. (2012). HALKOS, GEORGE ; Matsiori, Steriani.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:41:y:2012:i:4:p:391-399.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Is the value of an environmental public good sensitive to the providing institution?. (2012). Koundouri, Phoebe ; Kountouris, Yiannis ; Remoundou, Kyriaki.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:34:y:2012:i:3:p:381-395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. The environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a threatened theory? A meta-analysis. (2012). Motel Combes, Pascale ; Dakpo, K ; Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cdi:wpaper:1352.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Economic valuation of coastal zone quality improvements. (2011). HALKOS, GEORGE.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:35395.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. The Value of EU Agricultural Landscape. (2011). gomez y paloma, sergio ; Ciaian, Pavel ; Sergio Gomez y Paloma, .
    In: JRC Research Reports.
    RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc65456.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Valuation of EU Agricultural Landscape. (2011). gomez y paloma, sergio ; Ciaian, Pavel ; Sergio Gomez y Paloma, .
    In: EERI Research Paper Series.
    RePEc:eei:rpaper:eeri_rp_2011_20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Income effects and the inconvenience of private provision of public goods for bads: The case of recycling in Finland. (2010). Huhtala, Anni.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:8:p:1675-1681.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. An econometric analysis of willingness-to-pay for sustainable development: A case study of the Volcji Potok landscape area. (2009). Verbič, Miroslav ; Slabe-Erker, Renata.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:68:y:2009:i:5:p:1316-1328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation?. (2008). Hanley, Nick ; Jacobsen, Jette.
    In: Stirling Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:stl:stledp:2008-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. A Meta-Analysis of Contingent Valuation Studies in Coastal and Near-Shore Marine Ecosystems. (2008). Stern, David ; Liu, Shuang.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:11608.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. User fees, equity and the benefits of public outdoor recreation services. (2008). Huhtala, Anni ; Pouta, Eija.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:14:y:2008:i:2:p:117-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Contingent valuation: A new perspective. (2008). Schläpfer, Felix.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:64:y:2008:i:4:p:729-740.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. A Meta-Analysis of Contingent Valuation Studies in Coastal and Near-Shore Marine Ecosystems. (2008). Stern, David ; Liu, Shuang.
    In: Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:cse:wpaper:2008-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Economic Valuation of Environmental Values of the Landscape Development and Protection Area of Volcji Potok. (2007). Verbič, Miroslav ; Erker, Renata.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:1819.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Anchors, endorsements, and preferences: A field experiment. (2007). Schläpfer, Felix ; Schmitt, Marcel.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:29:y:2007:i:3:p:229-243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Cost credibility and the stated preference analysis of public goods. (2007). Flores, Nicholas ; Strong, Aaron.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:29:y:2007:i:3:p:195-205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. 20 years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: A meta-analysis. (2007). Lindhjem, Henrik.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:12:y:2007:i:4:p:251-277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Determinants of Participation versus Consumption in the Nordic Swan Eco-labeled Market. (2005). Khanna, Madhu ; Brouhle, Keith.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Arrow, K. ; Solow, R. ; Portney, P.R. ; Leamer, E.E. ; Radner, R. ; Schuman, H. ; Solow, R. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. 1993 Federal Register. 58 4601-4644
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Barton, D.N. The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica. 2002 Ecological Economics. 42 147-164

3. Bateman, I.J. ; Jones, A.P. Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values. 2003 Land Economics. 79 235-258

4. Bateman, I.J. ; Langford, I.H. ; Munro, A. ; Starmer, C. ; Sugden, R. Estimating four Hicksian welfare measures for a public good: a contingent valuation investigation. 2000 Land Economics. 76 355-373

5. Bergstrom, T.C. ; Goodman, R.P. Private demands for public goods. 1973 American Economic Review. 63 280-296

6. Berrens, R.P. ; Jenkins-Smith, H. ; Bohara, A.K. ; Silva, C.L. Further investigation of voluntary contribution contingent valuation: fair share, time of contribution, and respondent uncertainty. 2002 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 44 144-168

7. Blamey, R.K. ; Bennett, J.W. ; Louviere, J.J. ; Morrison, M.D. ; Rolfe, J. A test of policy labels in environmental choice modelling studies. 2000 Ecological Economics. 32 269-286

8. Blamey, R.K. ; Bennett, J.W. ; Louviere, J.J. ; Morrison, M.D. ; Rolfe, J.C. Attribute causality in environmental choice modelling. 2002 Environmental & Resource Economics. 23 167-186

9. Blamey, R.K. ; Bennett, J.W. ; Morrison, M.D. Yea-saying in contingent valuation surveys. 1999 Land Economics. 75 126-141

10. Bohara, A.K. ; McKee, M. ; Berrens, R.P. ; Jenkins-Smith, H. ; Silva, C.L. Effects of total cost and group-size information on willingness to pay responses: open ended vs. dichotomous choice. 1998 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 35 142-163

11. Borcherding, T.E. ; Deacon, R.T. Demand for services of non-federal governments. 1972 American Economic Review. 62 891-901

12. Boyle, K.J. ; Holmes, T.P. ; Teisl, M.F. ; Roe, B. A comparison of conjoint analysis response formats. 2001 American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 83 441-454

13. Breffle, W.S. ; Rowe, R.D. Comparing choice question formats for evaluating natural resource tradeoffs. 2002 Land Economics. 78 298-314

14. Brouwer, R. ; Spaninks, F.A. The validity of environmental benefits transfer: further empirical testing. 1999 Environmental & Resource Economics. 14 95-117

15. Cameron, T.A. ; Poe, G.L. ; Ethier, R.G. ; Schulze, W.D. Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: are the underlying preferences the same?. 2002 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 44 391-425

16. Carlsson, F. ; Martinsson, P. Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment. 2001 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 41 179-192

17. Champ, P.A. ; Bishop, R.C. Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: an empirical study of hypothetical bias. 2001 Environmental & Resource Economics. 19 383-402

18. Champ, P.A. ; Flores, N.E. ; Brown, T.C. ; Chivers, J. Contingent valuation and incentives. 2002 Land Economics. 78 591-604

19. Champ, P.A. ; Loomis, J.B. WTA estimates using the method of paired comparison: tests of robustness. 1998 Environmental & Resource Economics. 12 375-386

20. Cummings, R.G. ; Taylor, L.O. Does realism matter in contingent valuation surveys?. 1998 Land Economics. 74 203-215

21. Del Saz-Salazar, S. ; Garcia-Menendez, L. Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in a large city—evidence from the Spike model and from a non-parametric approach. 2001 Environmental & Resource Economics. 20 103-112

22. Ethier, R.G. ; Poe, G.L. ; Schulze, W.D. ; Clark, J. A comparison of hypothetical phone and mail contingent valuation responses for green-pricing electricity programs. 2000 Land Economics. 76 54-67

23. Farber, S. ; Griner, B. Valuing watershed quality improvements using conjoint analysis. 2000 Ecological Economics. 34 63-76

24. Flores, N.E. ; Carson, R.T. The relationship between income elasticities of demand and willingness to pay. 1997 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 33 287-295

25. Flores, N.E., Strong, A., 2004. Stated preference analysis of public goods: are we asking the right questions? Discussion Paper no. 04-2, Department of Economics, University of Colorado.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Garrod, G. ; Willis, K. Using contingent ranking to estimate the loss of amenity value for inland waterways from public utility service structures. 1998 Environmental & Resource Economics. 12 241-247

27. Giraud, K.L. ; Loomis, J.B. ; Cooper, J.C. A comparison of willingness to pay estimation techniques from referendum questions—application to endangered fish. 2001 Environmental & Resource Economics. 20 331-346

28. Gregory, R. ; Lichtenstein, S. ; Slovic, P. Valuing environmental resources—a constructive approach. 1993 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 7 177-197
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Gregory, R.S. Valuing environmental policy options: a case study comparison of multiattribute and contingent valuation survey methods. 2000 Land Economics. 76 151-173

30. Hökby, S. ; Söderqvist, T. Elasticities of demand and willingness to pay for environmental services in Sweden. 2003 Environmental and Resource Economics. 26 361-383

31. Hailu, A. ; Adamowicz, W.L. ; Boxall, P.C. Complements, substitutes, budget constraints and valuation—application of a multi-program environmental valuation method. 2000 Environmental & Resource Economics. 16 51-68

32. Halvorsen, B. ; Saelensminde, K. Differences between willingness-to-pay estimates from open-ended and discrete-choice contingent valuation methods: the effects of heteroscedasticity. 1998 Land Economics. 74 262-282

33. Hanemann, W.M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. 1994 Journal of Economic Perspectives. 8 19-43

34. Hanemann, W.M. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept—how much can they differ. 1991 American Economic Review. 81 635-647

35. Hanley, N. ; Wright, R.E. ; Adamowicz, V. Using choice experiments to value the environment—design issues, current experience and future prospects. 1998 Environmental & Resource Economics. 11 413-428

36. Horowitz, J.K. ; McConnell, K.E. A review of WTA/WTP studies. 2002 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 44 426-447

37. Horowitz, J.K. ; McConnell, K.E. Willingness to accept, willingness to pay and the income effect. 2003 Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 51 537-545

38. Huhtala, A. Binary choice valuation studies with heterogeneous preferences regarding the program being valued. 2000 Environmental & Resource Economics. 16 263-279

39. Jakobsson, K.M. ; Dragun, A.K. The worth of a possum: valuing species with the contingent valuation method. 2001 Environmental & Resource Economics. 19 211-227

40. Johnston, R.J. ; Swallow, S.K. ; Weaver, T.F. Estimating willingness to pay and resource tradeoffs with different payment mechanisms: an evaluation of a funding guarantee for watershed management. 1999 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 38 97-120

41. Jorgensen, B.S. ; Syme, G.J. Protest responses and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement. 2000 Ecological Economics. 33 251-265

42. Jorgensen, B.S. ; Syme, G.J. ; Bishop, B.J. ; Nancarrow, B.E. Protest responses in contingent valuation. 1999 Environmental & Resource Economics. 14 131-150

43. Jorgensen, B.S. ; Wilson, M.A. ; Heberlein, T.A. Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: attitude towards paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope. 2001 Ecological Economics. 36 133-148

44. Kamuanga, M. ; Swallow, B.M. ; Sigue, H. ; Bauer, B. Evaluating contingent and actual contributions to a local public good: tsetse control in the Yale agro-pastoral zone, Burkina Faso. 2001 Ecological Economics. 39 115-130

45. Kinnell, J. ; Lazo, J.K. ; Epp, D.J. ; Fisher, A. ; Shortle, J.S. Perceptions and values for preventing ecosystem change: Pennsylvania duck hunters and the Prairie Pothole Region. 2002 Land Economics. 78 228-244

46. Kriström, B. ; Riera, P. Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one?. 1996 Environmental & Resource Economics. 7 45-55

47. Langford, I.H. ; Kontogianni, A. ; Skourtos, M.S. ; Georgiou, S. ; Bateman, I.J. Multivariate mixed models for open-ended contingent valuation data-willingness to pay for conservation of monk seals. 1998 Environmental & Resource Economics. 12 443-456

48. List, J.A. ; Gallet, C.A. What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?. 2001 Environmental & Resource Economics. 20 241-254

49. Lockwood, M. Preference structures, property rights, and paired comparisons. 1999 Environmental & Resource Economics. 13 107-122

50. Loomis, J. ; Ekstrand, E. Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: the case of the Mexican spotted owl. 1998 Ecological Economics. 27 29-41

51. Loomis, J. ; Kent, P. ; Strange, L. ; Fausch, K. ; Covich, A. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. 2000 Ecological Economics. 33 103-117

52. Loomis, J.B. Vertically summing public good demand curves: an empirical comparison of economic versus political jurisdictions. 2000 Land Economics. 76 312-321

53. Loomis, J.B. ; Bair, L.S. ; Gonzalez-Caban, A.G. Language-related differences in a contingent valuation study: English versus Spanish. 2002 American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 84 1091-1102

54. Loomis, J.B. ; Gonzalez-Caban, A. A willingness-to-pay function for protecting acres of spotted owl habitat from fire. 1998 Ecological Economics. 25 315-322

55. Macmillan, D.C. ; Duff, E.I. ; Elston, D.A. Modelling the non-market environmental costs and benefits of biodiversity projects using contingent valuation data. 2001 Environmental & Resource Economics. 18 391-410

56. Macmillan, D.C. ; Smart, T.S. ; Thorburn, A.P. A field experiment involving cash and hypothetical charitable donations. 1999 Environmental & Resource Economics. 14 399-412

57. Markowska, A. ; Zylicz, T. Costing an international public good: the case of the Baltic Sea. 1999 Ecological Economics. 30 301-316

58. McFadden, D. Contingent valuation and social choice. 1994 American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 76 689-702

59. McFadden, D. Economic choices. 2001 American Economic Review. 91 351-378

60. McFadden, D. ; Leonard, G.D. Issues in the contingent valuation of environmental goods: methodologies for data collection and analysis. 1993 En : Hausman, J.A. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. North Holland Press: Amsterdam
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

61. Messonnier, M.L. ; Bergstrom, J.C. ; Cornwell, C.M. ; Teasley, R.J. ; Cordell, H.K. Survey response-related biases in contingent valuation: concepts, remedies, and empirical application to valuing aquatic plant management. 2000 American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 82 438-450

62. Mitchell, R.C. ; Carson, R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Continent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington DC. 1989 John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

63. Morrison, M.D. ; Blamey, R.K. ; Bennett, J.W. Minimising payment vehicle bias in contingent valuation studies. 2000 Environmental & Resource Economics. 16 407-422

64. Navrud, S. Valuing health impacts from air pollution in Europe—new empirical evidence on morbidity. 2001 Environmental & Resource Economics. 20 305-329

65. Peterson, G.L. ; Brown, T.C. Economic valuation by the method of paired comparison, with emphasis on evaluation of the transitivity axiom. 1998 Land Economics. 74 240-261

66. Poe, G.L. ; Bishop, R.C. Valuing the incremental benefits of groundwater protection when exposure levels are known. 1999 Environmental & Resource Economics. 13 341-367

67. Poe, G.L. ; Clark, J.E. ; Rondeau, D. ; Schulze, W.D. Provision point mechanisms and field validity tests of contingent valuation. 2002 Environmental & Resource Economics. 23 105-131

68. Pouta, E. ; Rekola, M. ; Kuuluvainen, J. ; Li, C.Z. ; Tahvonen, I. Willingness to pay in different policy-planning methods: insights into respondents' decision-making processes. 2002 Ecological Economics. 40 295-311

69. Ready, R.C. ; Navrud, S. ; Dubourg, W.R. How do respondents with uncertain willingness to pay answer contingent valuation questions?. 2001 Land Economics. 77 315-326

70. Reaves, D.W. ; Kramer, R.A. ; Holmes, T.P. Does question format matter? Valuing an endangered species. 1999 Environmental & Resource Economics. 14 365-383

71. Riddel, M. ; Loomis, J. Joint estimation of multiple CVM scenarios under a double bounded questioning format. 1998 Environmental & Resource Economics. 12 77-98

72. Rolfe, J. ; Bennett, J. ; Louviere, J. Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation. 2000 Ecological Economics. 35 289-302

73. Roschewitz, A. Der monetäre Wert der Kulturlandschaft. 1999 Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk: Kiel, Germany
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

74. Russell, C. ; Dale, V. ; Lee, J.S. ; Jensen, M.H. ; Kane, M. Experimenting with multi-attribute utility survey methods in a multi-dimensional valuation problem. 2001 Ecological Economics. 36 87-108

75. Scarpa, R. ; Willis, K. ; Garrod, G. Estimating benefits for effective enforcement of speed reduction from dichotomous-choice CV—the case of rural trunk roads. 2001 Environmental & Resource Economics. 20 281-304

76. Schläpfer, F. ; Deacon, R.T. ; Hanley, N. A note on the measurement of bias in stated willingness to pay for public goods. 2005 Kyklos. 58 145-152

77. Schläpfer, F. ; Hanley, N. Do local landscape patterns affect the demand for landscape amenities protection?. 2003 Journal of Agricultural Economics. 54 21-35

78. Schläpfer, F. ; Roschewitz, A. ; Hanley, N. Validation of stated preferences for public goods: a comparison of contingent valuation survey response and voting behaviour. 2004 Ecological Economics. 51 1-16

79. Schläpfer, F. ; Schmitt, M. ; Roschewitz, A. Stated preferences with and without external value cues. 2004 En : . :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
80. Schwarz, N. Cognition, communication, and survey measurement: some implications for contingent valuation surveys. 1997 En : Kopp, R.J. Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods. Kluwer: Boston
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

81. Shechter, M. ; Reiser, B. ; Zaitsev, N. Measuring passive use value-pledges, donations and CV responses in connection with an important natural resource. 1998 Environmental & Resource Economics. 12 457-478

82. Spash, C.L. Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation. 2000 Ecological Economics. 34 195-215

83. Stevens, T.H. ; Belkner, R. ; Dennis, D. ; Kittredge, D. ; Willis, C. Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem management. 2000 Ecological Economics. 32 63-74

84. Sugden, R. Alternatives to the neoclassical theory of choice. 1999 En : Willis, K.G. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Counties. Oxford University Press: Oxford
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

85. Swallow, S.K. ; Opaluch, J.J. ; Weaver, T.F. Strength-of-preference indicators and an ordered-response model for ordinarily dichotomous, discrete choice data. 2001 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 41 70-93

86. Welsh, M.P. ; Poe, G.L. Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach. 1998 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 36 170-185

87. Whitehead, J.C. Incentive incompatibility and starting-point bias in iterative valuation questions. 2002 Land Economics. 78 285-297

88. Whitehead, J.C. ; Blomquist, G.C. ; Ready, R.C. ; Huang, J.C. Construct validity of dichotomous and polychotomous choice contingent valuation questions. 1998 Environmental & Resource Economics. 11 107-116

89. Whitehead, J.C. ; Hoban, T.J. Testing for temporal reliability in contingent valuation with time for changes in factors affecting demand. 1999 Land Economics. 75 453-465

90. Yoo, S.H. ; Yang, H.J. Application of sample selection model to double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. 2001 Environmental & Resource Economics. 20 147-163

1. Benefit transfer and the economic value of Biocapacity: Introducing the ecosystem service Yield factor. (2021). Niccolucci, Valentina ; Marchettini, Nadia ; Coscieme, Luca.
   In: Ecosystem Services.
   RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:48:y:2021:i:c:s2212041621000140.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Urban natural resource accounting based on the system of environmental economic accounting in Northwest China: A case study of Xi’an. (2021). Jia, Yuwei ; Yang, YI ; Ling, Sun ; Yao, Congxu.
   In: Ecosystem Services.
   RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:47:y:2021:i:c:s2212041620301753.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Relative Versus Absolute Commodity Measurements in Benefit Transfer: Consequences for Validity and Reliability. (2020). Zawojska, Ewa ; Johnston, Robert.
   In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:102:y:2020:i:4:p:1245-1270.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Economic valuation of green and blue nature in cities: A meta-analysis. (2020). Bockarjova, Marija ; Botzen, Wouter ; Koetse, Mark J.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:169:y:2020:i:c:s0921800918318986.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Property values, water quality, and benefit transfer: A nationwide meta-analysis. (2020). Heberling, Matthew ; Guignet, Dennis ; Griot, Olivia ; Papenfus, Michael ; Holland, Ben.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:apl:wpaper:20-04.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Can the environment be an inferior good ? A theory with context-dependent substitutability and needs.. (2019). Martinet, Vincent ; Dupoux, Marion.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:fae:wpaper:2019.08.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The Inclusion of Ecosystem Service Valuations in Bioenergy Cost Analysis: A Case Study of Constructed Wetlands in the Neotropics. (2019). Snyder, Brian F.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:156:y:2019:i:c:p:196-201.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Income inequality and the international transfer of environmental values. (2018). Hanley, Nick ; Drupp, Moritz ; Meya, Jasper N.
   In: Economics Working Papers.
   RePEc:zbw:cauewp:201703.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Benefit Transfer and Commodity Measurement Scales: Consequences for Validity and Reliability. (2018). Zawojska, Ewa ; Johnston, Robert.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:war:wpaper:2018-26.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Economic Valuation of Green and Blue Nature in Cities: A Meta-Analysis. (2018). Bockarjova, Marija ; Botzen, Wouter ; W. J. W. Botzen, ; Koetse, Mark J.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:use:tkiwps:1808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. A bottom-up approach to environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis. (2018). Olsen, Søren ; Hanley, Nick ; Pedersen, Soren Marcus ; Carolus, Johannes Friedrich.
    In: Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics.
    RePEc:sss:wpaper:2018-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. The Monetary Value of Having a First Division Bundesliga Team to Local Residents. (2018). Wicker, Pamela ; Frick, Bernd.
    In: Schmalenbach Business Review.
    RePEc:spr:schmbr:v:70:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s41464-017-0044-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Improving Water Quality in an Iconic Estuary: An Internal Meta-analysis of Property Value Impacts Around the Chesapeake Bay. (2018). Walsh, Patrick ; Klemick, Heather ; Guignet, Dennis ; Griffiths, Charles.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:69:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0078-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Limits to Substitution Between Ecosystem Services and Manufactured Goods and Implications for Social Discounting. (2018). Drupp, Moritz.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:69:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0068-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. A Bottom-up Approach to Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis. (2018). Olsen, Søren ; Hanley, Nick ; Pedersen, Soren Marcus ; Carolus, Johannes Friedrich.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:152:y:2018:i:c:p:282-295.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Preferences for Energy Efficiency vs. Renewables: What Is the Willingness to Pay to Reduce CO2 Emissions?. (2018). Zverinova, Iva ; Ščasný, Milan ; Bigano, Andrea ; Zvinova, Iva ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:144:y:2018:i:c:p:171-185.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Income inequality and willingness to pay for environmental public goods. (2017). Quaas, Martin ; Drupp, Moritz ; Baumgärtner, Stefan ; Meya, Jasper N ; Munz, Jan M ; Baumgartner, Stefan.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:85:y:2017:i:c:p:35-61.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Choosing a Functional Form for an International Benefit Transfer: Evidence from a Nine-country Valuation Experiment. (2017). Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Artell, Janne ; Ahtiainen, Heini.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:134:y:2017:i:c:p:104-113.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Limits to substitution between ecosystem services and manufactured goods and implications for social discounting. (2016). Drupp, Moritz.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:68298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. (2016). Zulkafli, Z ; Buytaert, W ; Karpouzoglou, T ; Mao, F ; Hannah, D M ; Pandeya, B.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:22:y:2016:i:pb:p:250-259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Farmer perceptions of wetlands and waterbodies: Using social metrics as an alternative to ecosystem service valuation. (2016). Greenland-Smith, Simon ; Sherren, Kate ; Brazner, John.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:126:y:2016:i:c:p:58-69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Explaining Variation in the Value of Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Using Internal Meta-analysis. (2015). Walsh, Patrick ; Klemick, Heather ; Guignet, Dennis ; Griffiths, Charles.
    In: NCEE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:nev:wpaper:wp201504.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. The recreational value of gold coast beaches, Australia: An application of the travel cost method. (2015). Nunes, Paulo ; Ma, Chunbo ; Wang, Xiaohua ; Zhang, Fan.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:11:y:2015:i:c:p:106-114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Nonmarket Valuation of Water Sensitive Cities: Current Knowledge and Issues. (2015). Fogarty, James ; Zhang, Fan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:uwauwp:207694.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Disentangling the Pure Time Effect From Site and Preference Heterogeneity Effects in Benefit Transfer: An Empirical Investigation of Transferability. (2014). Olsen, Søren ; Fetene, Gebeyehu ; Bonnichsen, Ole.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:59:y:2014:i:4:p:583-611.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Estimating the value of national sporting success. (2012). von Hanau, Tassilo ; Wicker, Pamela ; Prinz, Joachim.
    In: Sport Management Review.
    RePEc:eee:spomar:v:15:y:2012:i:2:p:200-210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Operationalising ecosystem service approaches for governance: Do measuring, mapping and valuing integrate sector-specific knowledge systems?. (2012). Primmer, Eeva ; Furman, Eeva.
    In: Ecosystem Services.
    RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:85-92.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Estimating the Economic Value of Landscape Losses Due to Flooding by Hydropower Plants in the Chilean Patagonia. (2011). Vásquez Lavín, Felipe ; Ponce Oliva, Roberto ; Debels, Patrick ; Vasquez, Felipe ; Orihuela, Carlos ; Stehr, Alejandra.
    In: Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA).
    RePEc:spr:waterr:v:25:y:2011:i:10:p:2449-2466.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe. (2011). Schaafsma, Marije ; Navrud, Stale ; Ferrini, Silvia ; Brouwer, Roy ; Bateman, Ian ; Semnien, D. ; Barton, D. ; Hime, S. ; Hasler, B. ; Dubgaard, A. ; eponaviit, R. ; De Nocker, L. ; Liekens, I..
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:50:y:2011:i:3:p:365-387.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Implicit prices for longer temporary exhibitions in a heritage site and a test of preference heterogeneity: A segmentation-based approach. (2011). Choi, Andy.
    In: Tourism Management.
    RePEc:eee:touman:v:32:y:2011:i:3:p:511-519.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. The spatial transferability of parameters in a gravity model of commuting flows. (2011). Ubøe, Jan ; Ube, Jan ; Thorsen, Inge ; Kleppe, Gisle ; McArthur, David Philip.
    In: Journal of Transport Geography.
    RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:19:y:2011:i:4:p:596-605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. The Value of Improved Public Services: An Application of the Choice Experiment Method to Estimate the Value of Improved Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure in India. (2010). Das, Sukanya ; Birol, Ekin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:mad:wpaper:2010-051.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Socioeconomic adjustments and choice experiment benefit function transfer: Evaluating the common wisdom. (2010). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:421-438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Study on benefit transfer in an international setting. How to improve welfare estimates in the case of the countries income heterogeneity?. (2010). Ščasný, Milan ; Czajkowski, Mikolaj ; Scasn, Milan .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:12:p:2409-2416.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. The Value of Improved Public Services : An Application of the Choice Experiment Method to Estimate the Value of Improved Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure in India. (2010). Das, Sukanya ; Birol, Ekin.
    In: Development Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:eab:develo:23062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. METHODS, TRENDS AND CONTROVERSIES IN CONTEMPORARY BENEFIT TRANSFER. (2010). Johnston, Robert ; Rosenberger, Randall S..
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:24:y:2010:i:3:p:479-510.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Can Contingent Valuation be Used to Measure the in Situ Value of Groundwater on the North China Plain?. (2007). White, Robert ; Zhang, Jiaboa ; Chen, Deli ; Davidson, Brian ; Li, Baoguo ; Wei, Yongping.
    In: Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA).
    RePEc:spr:waterr:v:21:y:2007:i:10:p:1735-1749.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Exploring Benefit Transfer: Disamenities of Waste Transfer Stations. (2007). Shechter, Mordechai.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:37:y:2007:i:3:p:521-547.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Sistemas de Sanciones por Daños Ambientales para la Fiscalización de la Industria de Hidrocarburos en el Perú. (2006). Vásquez Cordano, Arturo ; Vasquez, Arturo .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ose:wpaper:20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives. (2006). Spash, Clive ; Vatn, Arild.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:60:y:2006:i:2:p:379-388.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Survey protocol and income effects in the contingent valuation of public goods: A meta-analysis. (2006). Schläpfer, Felix.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:57:y:2006:i:3:p:415-429.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. The Transfer of Benefit Measures: The Applicability Conditions and the Results. (2006). Stellin, Guiseppe ; Candido, Alice.
    In: Conference Papers.
    RePEc:ags:umcicp:6627.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. A Critique of Conventional Non-market Valuation: Attitudes and Action. (2006). Choi, Andy ; Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare06:174461.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Du concept à la fiabilité de la méthode du transfert en économie de l’environnement : un état de l’art. (2005). Genty, Aurélien.
    In: Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales.
    RePEc:rae:jouces:v:77:y:2005:p:5-34.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Du concept à la fiabilité de la méthode du transfert en économie de l’environnement : un état de l’art. (2005). Genty, Aurélien.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01201112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Du concept à la fiabilité de la méthode du transfert en économie de l’environnement : un état de l’art. (2005). Genty, Aurélien.
    In: Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR).
    RePEc:ags:inrace:201766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. A Critique of Conventional Non-market Valuation: Attitudes and Action. (2005). Bennett, Jeffrey W. ; Choi, Andy Sungnok .
    In: 2005 Conference (49th), February 9-11, 2005, Coff's Harbour, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare05:139316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. The economics of community watershed management: some evidence from Nicaragua. (2004). Johnson, Nancy L. ; Baltodano, Maria Eugenia.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:49:y:2004:i:1:p:57-71.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Measuring the Economic Benefits of Water Quality Improvement with the Benefit Transfer Method: An Introduction for Non-Economists. (2004). Whitehead, John ; Schuhmann, Pete ; Dumas, Chris .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:04-12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. VALORACIÓN DE LOS BENEFICIOS ECONÓMICOS PROVISTOS POR EL SISTEMA DE PARQUES NACIONALES NATURALES: UNA APLICACIÓN DEL ANÁLISIS DE TRANSFERENCIA DE BENEFICIOS. (2003). Ibáñez, Ana ; Carriazo, Fernando ; Garcia, Marcela ; Ibaez, Ana Maria.
    In: Documentos CEDE.
    RePEc:col:000089:003747.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-06 00:20:14 || Missing content? Let us know