1. The Economic Value of Ecosystem Services: Meta-analysis and Potential Application of Value Transfer for Freshwater Ecosystems. (2024). Gilioli, Gianni ; Simonetto, Anna ; Ventura, Vera ; Amatucci, Achille.
   In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
   RePEc:kap:enreec:v:87:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s10640-024-00930-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Crowdfunding or crowdsourcing time: Exploring the willingness of private citizens to help prevent forest fires. (2024). Valente, Marieta ; Fernandes, Maria ; Costa, Ligia Maria.
   In: Forest Policy and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:forpol:v:163:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124000637.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Changes in urban green spaces’ value perception: A meta-analytic benefit transfer function for European cities. (2021). Pareglio, Stefano ; Guastella, Gianni ; Diluiso, Francesca.
   In: Land Use Policy.
   RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:101:y:2021:i:c:s0264837719321337.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The value of forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis at the European scale and application to national ecosystem accounting. (2021). Grammatikopoulou, Ioanna ; Kov, Davina Vaa.
   In: Ecosystem Services.
   RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:48:y:2021:i:c:s2212041621000206.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. The economic values of global forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis. (2021). Taye, Fitalew Agimass ; Le, Dung ; Fleming, Christopher M ; Ange, Chantal Saint ; MacKey, Brendan ; Buckwell, Andrew ; Hasan, Syezlin ; Folkersen, Maja Vinde ; Diwakar, K C.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:189:y:2021:i:c:s0921800921002032.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. How does a biodiversity value impact upon optimal rotation length? An investigation using species richness and forest stand age. (2019). Saraev, Vadim ; Valatin, Gregory ; Quine, Christopher ; Peace, Andrew.
   In: Forest Policy and Economics.
   RePEc:eee:forpol:v:107:y:2019:i:c:3.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The means determine the end – Pursuing integrated valuation in practice. (2018). Dunford, Robert ; Rusch, Graciela M ; Harrison, Paula A ; Turkelboom, Francis ; Tenerelli, Patrizia ; Kelemen, Eszter ; Termansen, Mette ; Gmez-Baggethun, Erik ; Garca-Llorente, Marina ; Barton, David N ; Kopperoinen, Leena ; Martn-Lpez, Berta ; Priess, Joerg A ; Luque, Sandra ; Hauck, Jennifer ; Jacobs, Sander ; Palomo, Ignacio ; Smith, Ron ; Saarikoski, Heli ; Demeyer, Rolinde ; Keune, Hans.
   In: Ecosystem Services.
   RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:29:y:2018:i:pc:p:515-528.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Benefits From Water Related Ecosystem Services in Africa and Climate Change. (2018). Pettinotti, Laetitia ; Ojea, Elena ; de Ayala, Amaia.
   In: Ecological Economics.
   RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:149:y:2018:i:c:p:294-305.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Stated preferences: a unique database composed of 1657 recent published articles in journals related to agriculture, environment, or health. (2017). Wolff, François-Charles ; Andersson, Henrik ; Dit, Romain Crastes ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Beaumais, Olivier ; Hess, Stephane.
   In: Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies.
   RePEc:spr:roafes:v:98:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s41130-017-0053-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. A generic marginal value function for natural areas. (2017). Verhoef, Erik ; Koetse, Mark J ; Brander, Luke M.
    In: The Annals of Regional Science.
    RePEc:spr:anresc:v:58:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s00168-016-0795-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Ecosystem Services and REDD: Estimating the Benefits of Non-Carbon Services in Worldwide Forests. (2016). Loureiro, Maria ; Barrio, Melina ; Allo, Maria ; Ojea, Elena.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:78:y:2016:i:c:p:246-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Multifunctional recreation and nouveau heritage values in plantation forests. (2015). Rolfe, John ; Windle, Jill.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:3:p:131-151.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Understanding the economic value of water ecosystem services from tropical forests: A systematic review for South and Central America. (2015). Martin-Ortega, Julia ; Ojea, Elena.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:2:p:97-106.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Valuing type and scope of ecosystem conservation: A meta-analysis. (2015). HUSSAIN, Anwar ; Phillips, Spencer ; Hjerpe, Evan.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:32-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Comparing different attitude statements in latent class models of stated preferences for managing an invasive forest pathogen. (2015). Meldrum, James.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:120:y:2015:i:c:p:13-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. A meta-analysis of residential water demand studies. (2014). Sebri, Maamar.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:16:y:2014:i:3:p:499-520.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Is Choice Experiment Becoming more Popular than Contingent Valuation? A Systematic Review in Agriculture, Environment and Health. (2014). Wolff, François-Charles ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Andersson, Henrik ; Crastes, Romain ; Beaumais, Olivier.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fae:wpaper:2014.12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Estimating the benefits of recreation-oriented management in state-owned commercial forests in Finland: A choice experiment. (2014). Ovaskainen, Ville ; Juutinen, Artti ; Kosenius, Anna-Kaisa.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:20:y:2014:i:4:p:396-412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Forest owner perceptions of institutions and voluntary contracting for biodiversity conservation: Not crowding out but staying out. (2014). Paloniemi, Riikka ; Simila, Jukka ; Primmer, Eeva ; Tainio, Anna .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:103:y:2014:i:c:p:1-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Valuing the benefits of an afforestation project in a peri-urban area with choice experiments. (2013). Vecchiato, Daniel ; Tempesta, T..
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:26:y:2013:i:c:p:111-120.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Heterogeneous nonmarket benefits of managing white pine bluster rust in high-elevation pine forests. (2013). Meldrum, James ; Champ, Patricia A. ; Bond, Craig A..
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:19:y:2013:i:1:p:61-77.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Meta-analysis of consumers willingness-to-pay premiums for certified wood products. (2013). Aguilar, Francisco ; Cai, Zhen.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:19:y:2013:i:1:p:15-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Valuation of species and nature conservation in Asia and Oceania: a meta-analysis. (2012). TRAN, TUAN ; Lindhjem, Henrik ; Tuan, Tran.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:14:y:2012:i:1:p:1-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. The environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a threatened theory? A meta-analysis. (2012). Motel Combes, Pascale ; Dakpo, K ; Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00691863.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. The environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a threatened theory? A meta-analysis. (2012). Motel Combes, Pascale ; Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna ; Dakpo, Herve K.
    In: CERDI Working papers.
    RePEc:hal:cdiwps:halshs-00691863.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Testing for hypothetical bias in willingness to support a reforestation program. (2012). Krawczyk, Michal.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:18:y:2012:i:4:p:282-289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: Good practice guidelines. (2012). Thiene, Mara ; Signorello, Giovanni ; Navrud, Stale ; Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Kaval, Pamela ; Giergiczny, Marek ; Elsasser, Peter ; De Salvo, Maria ; Dragoi, Simona ; Madureira, Livia ; Notaro, Sandra ; Mavsar, Robert ; Rulleau, Benedicte ; Riera, Pere.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:18:y:2012:i:4:p:259-270.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. The environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a threatened theory? A meta-analysis. (2012). Motel Combes, Pascale ; Dakpo, K ; Choumert-Nkolo, Johanna.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cdi:wpaper:1352.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions from Environmental, Transport, and Health Policies: A Global Meta‐Analysis of Stated Preference Studies. (2011). Navrud, Stale ; Biausque, Vincent ; Braathen, Nils Axel ; Lindhjem, Henrik.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:31:y:2011:i:9:p:1381-1407.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. The Value of EU Agricultural Landscape. (2011). gomez y paloma, sergio ; Ciaian, Pavel ; Sergio Gomez y Paloma, .
    In: JRC Research Reports.
    RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc65456.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Valuation of EU Agricultural Landscape. (2011). gomez y paloma, sergio ; Ciaian, Pavel ; Sergio Gomez y Paloma, .
    In: EERI Research Paper Series.
    RePEc:eei:rpaper:eeri_rp_2011_20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation?. (2011). Navrud, Stale ; Lindhjem, Henrik.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:70:y:2011:i:9:p:1628-1637.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Can cheap panel-based internet surveys substitute costly in-person interviews in CV surveys?. (2010). Navrud, Stale ; Lindhjem, Henrik.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:24069.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Scaling up Ecosystem Services Values: Methodology, Applicability and a Case Study. (2010). Schaafsma, Marije ; Nunes, Paulo ; MARKANDYA, ANIL ; Kuik, Onno ; Paulo A. L. D. Nunes, ; Brander, Luke ; Ghermandi, Andrea ; Wagtendonk, Alfred.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2010.41.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies. (2010). Loureiro, Maria ; Barrio, Melina.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:69:y:2010:i:5:p:1023-1030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe. (2009). Tol, Richard ; Tol, Richard S. J., ; Zandersen, Marianne.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:15:y:2009:i:1-2:p:109-130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: The case of Poland. (2008). Zylicz, Tomasz ; Navrud, Stale ; Lindhjem, Henrik ; Bartczak, Anna ; Zandersen, Marianne.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:11483.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. Internet CV surveys – a cheap, fast way to get large samples of biased values?. (2008). Navrud, Stale ; Lindhjem, Henrik.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:11471.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. Meta-analysis of nature conservation values in Asia & Oceania: Data heterogeneity and benefit transfer issues. (2008). TRAN, TUAN ; Lindhjem, Henrik ; Tuan, Tran Hu.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:11470.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Meta-analysis of nature conservation values in Asia & Oceania: Data heterogeneity and benefit transfer issues. (2008). TRAN, TUAN ; Lindhjem, Henrik.
    In: EEPSEA Research Report.
    RePEc:eep:report:rr2008072.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: The case of Poland. (2008). Zylicz, Tomasz ; Navrud, Stale ; Lindhjem, Henrik ; Bartczak, Anna ; Zandersen, Marianne.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:10:y:2008:i:7-8:p:467-472.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers?. (2008). Navrud, Stale ; Lindhjem, Henrik.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:66:y:2008:i:2-3:p:425-435.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. How Reliable are Meta-Analyses for International Benefit Transfers?. (2007). Navrud, Stale ; Lindhjem, Henrik.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:11484.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Arrow, K.J. ; Solow, R. ; Leamer, E. ; Portney, P. ; Radner, R. ; Schuman, H. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. 1993 Federal Register. 58 4601-4614
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

2. Bateman, I., Munro, A., 2005. Household vs. Individual Valuation: What's the Difference? European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, Bremen.

3. Bateman, I.J. ; Jones, A.P. Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values. 2003 Land Economics. 79 235-258

4. Bijmolt, T.H.A. ; Pieters, R.G.M. Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements. 2001 Marketing Letters. 12 157-169
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
5. Bojö, J., 1985. Kostnadsnyttoanalys av fjällnära skogar: Fallet Vålådalen (Cost-benefit analysis of mountainous forests: the Vala Valley Case). Research Report, The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
6. Boman, M. Estimating costs and genetic benefits of various sizes of predator populations: the case of Bear, Wolf, Wolverine and Lynx in Sweden. 1995 Journal of Environmental Management. 43 349-357
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
7. Bostedt, G. ; Mattsson, L. The value of forests for tourism in Sweden. 1995 Annals of Tourism Research. 22 671-680
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
8. Bostedt, G., 1997. Public goods in Swedish forests: essays on nonmarket valuation and environmental policy. Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
9. Bostedt, G., Mattson, L., 1991. Skogens betydelse för turismen: En samhällsekonomisk pilotstudie (The importance of forests for tourism: a pilot cost-benefit analysis). Arbetsrapport 141, Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
10. Boyle, K.J. Contingent valuation in practice. 2003 En : Champ, P.A. ; Boyle, K.J. ; Brown, T.C. A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Brouwer, R. ; Langford, I.H. ; Bateman, I. ; Turner, R.K. A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. 1999 Regional Environmental Change. 1 47-57
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
12. Button, K. What can meta-analysis tell us about transport?. 1995 Regional Studies. 29 507-517
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Cameron, T.A. ; Poe, G.L. ; Ethier, R.G. ; Schulze, W.D. Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: are the underlying preferences the same?. 2002 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 44 391-425

14. Carson, R.T. Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History. 2004 Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

15. Carson, R.T. ; Flores, N.E. ; Martin, K.M. ; Wright, J.L. Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. 1996 Land Economics. 72 80-99

16. Carson, R.T. ; Flores, N.E. ; Meade, N.F. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. 2001 Environmental and Resource Economics. 19 173-210

17. Desvousges, W.H. ; Johnson, F.R. ; Banzhaf, H.S. Environmental Policy Analysis with Limited Information: Principles and Applications of the Transfer Method. 1998 Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK

18. Eiswerth, M. ; Shaw, W. Adjusting benefits transfer values for inflation. 1997 Water Resources Research. 33 2381-2385
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Florax, R.J.G.M. ; Nijkamp, P. ; Willis, K.G. Comparative Environmental Economic Assessment. 2002 Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK

20. Framstad, E. ; Økland, B. ; Bendiksen, E. ; Bakkestuen, V. ; Blom, H. ; Branderud, T.E. Evaluering av barskogvernet i Norge (Evaluation of the conservation of coniferous forests in Norway). 2002 NINA Fagrapport. 54 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Fredman, P. The existence of existence value: a study of the economic benefits of an endangered species. 1995 Journal of Forest Economics. 1 307-327
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

22. Fredman, P. ; Emmelin, L. Wilderness purism, willingness to pay and management preferences: a study of Swedish mountain tourists. 2001 Tourism Economics. 7 5-20

23. Garnes, A.S., Winther, G., 1991. Holdninger til og betalingsvillighet for flersidig skogbruk og barskogvern i Norge (Attitudes and WTO for multiple use forestry and forest preservation in Norway). Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

24. Hökby, S. ; Söderqvist, T. Elasticities of demand and willingness to pay for environmental services in Sweden. 2003 Environmental and Resource Economics. 26 361-383

25. Hanemann, W.M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. 1994 Journal of Economic Perspectives. 8 19-43

26. Hanley, N. ; Wright, R.E. ; Adamowicz, V. Using choice experiments to value the environment: design issues, current experience and future prospects. 1998 Environmental and Resource Economics. 11 413-428

27. Hoen, H.F. ; Winther, G. Multiple-use forestry and preservation of coniferous forests in Norway: a study of attitudes and Willingness-to-pay. 1993 Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 8 266-280
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Hoen, H.F., Veisten, K., 1994. En undersøkelse blant brukere av Oslomarka: synspunkter på skogtilstand og skogbehandling (A survey of the users of Oslomarka: attitudes towards forest scenary and forestry practices). Skogforsk 6/94.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Holgen, P. ; Mattsson, L. ; Li, C.Z. Recreation values of boreal forest stand types and landscapes resulting from different silvicultural systems: an economic analysis. 2000 Journal of Environmental Management. 60 173-180
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
30. Horne, P. ; Boxall, P.C. ; Adamowicz, W.L. Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment. 2005 Forest Ecology and Management. 207 189-199
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Horowitz, J.K. ; McConnell, K.E. Willingness to accept, willingness to pay and the income effect. 2003 Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 51 537-545

32. Jakus, P.M. ; Stephens, B. ; Fly, J.M. Temporal reliability in contingent valuation (with a restrictive research budget). 2006 En : Alberini, A. ; Kahn, J.R. Handbook on Contingent Valuation. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK

33. Johansson, P.-O. ; Zavisic, S. Svenska folkets miljöbudget. 1989 Ekonomisk Debatt. 6 472-474
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
34. Johansson, P.O. Valuing public goods in a risky world: an experiment. 1989 En : Folmer, H. ; van Ierland, E.C. Evaluation Methods and Policy Making in Environmental Economics. North-Holland: Amsterdam
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
35. Johansson, P.O. ; Kriström, B. ; Mattson, L. How is the willingness to pay for Moose hunting affected by the stock of Moose? An empirical study of Moose-hunters in the county of Västerbotten. 1988 Journal of Environmental Management. 163-171
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

36. Johnston, R.J. ; Besedin, E.Y. ; Iovanna, R. ; Miller, C.J. ; Wardwell, R.F. ; Ranson, M.H. Systematic variation in willingness to pay for aquatic resource improvements and implications for benefit transfer: a meta-analysis. 2005 Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 53 221-248

37. Johnston, R.J. ; Besedin, E.Y. ; Wardwell, R.F. Modeling relationships between use and nonuse values for surface water quality: a meta-analysis. 2003 Water Resources Research. 39 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

38. Kahneman, D. ; Knetsch, J.L. Valuing public-goods – the purchase of moral satisfaction. 1992 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 22 57-70

39. Kniivilä, M. ; Ovaskainen, V. ; Saastamoinen, O. Costs and benefits of forest conservation: regional and local comparisons in Eastern Finland. 2002 Journal of Forest Economics. 8 131-150

40. Kniivilä, M., 2004. Contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis of nature conservation: a case study in North Karelia, Finland. D.Sc. (Agriculture and Forestry) Thesis, University of Joensuu.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Kriström, B. A nonparametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. 1990 Land Economics. 66 135-139
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
42. Kriström, B. On the benefits of preserving virgin forests in Sweden. 1989 Scandinavian Forest Economics. 141-166
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
43. Kriström, B., 1990b. Valuing environmental benefits using the contingent valuation method – an econometric analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Umeå University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
44. Laitila, T. ; Paulrud, A. A multi-attribute extension of discrete-choice contingent valuation for valuation of angling site characteristics. 2006 Journal of Leisure Research. 38 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
45. Lehtonen, E. ; Kuuluvainen, J. ; Pouta, E. ; Rekola, M. ; Li, C.Z. Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland. 2003 Environmental Science and Policy. 6 195-204
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
46. Lehtonen, E., Kuuluvainen, J., Li, C.-Z., Pouta, E., Rekola, M., 2005a. Preference uncertainty in contingent valuation: the case of forest conservation in southern Finland, University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Economics.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Lehtonen, E., Kuuluvainen, J., Ovaskainen, V., Pouta, E., Rekola, M., 2005b. Influence of Logit Model Assumptions on Estimated Willingness to Pay for Forest Conservation in Southern Finland, University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Economics.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Leidal, K., 1996. Verdsetting av et bynært rekreasjonsområde: en betinget verdsettingsundersøkelse av området rundt Eigevannet i Kristiansand kommune (Valuation of an urban recreation area: a contingent valuation study of the Eige Lake area in Kristiansand municipality). Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

49. Li, C.Z. Semiparametric estimation of the binary choice model for contingent valuation. 1996 Land Economics. 72 462-473

50. Li, C.Z. ; Kuuluvainen, J. ; Pouta, E. ; Rekola, M. ; Tahvonen, O. Using choice experiments to value the Natura 2000 Nature conservation programs in Finland. 2004 Environmental and Resource Economics. 29 361-374

51. Li, C.Z. ; Mattsson, L. Discrete-choice under preference uncertainty – an improved structural model for contingent valuation. 1995 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 28 256-269

52. List, J.A. ; Gallet, C.A. What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?. 2001 Environmental and Resource Economics. 20 241-254

53. Loomis, J.B. ; White, D.S. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis. 1996 Ecological Economics. 18 197-206

54. Mäntymaa, E., Mönkkönen, M., Siikamäki, J., Svento, R., 2002. Estimating the demand for biodiversity – vagueness band and open-ended questions. In: van Ierland, E.C., Weikard, H.P., Wesseler, J. (Eds.), Proceedings: Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental and Resource Economics.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
55. Mattsson, L. ; Li, C.Z. How do different forest management-practices affect the non-timber value of forests – an economic-analysis. 1994 Journal of Environmental Management. 41 79-88
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
56. Mattsson, L. ; Li, C.Z. The non-timber value of Northern Swedish forests – an economic-analysis. 1993 Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 8 426-434
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Mitchell, R.C., Carson, R.T., 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

58. Murphy, J.J. ; Allen, P.G. ; Stevens, T.H. ; Weatherhead, D. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. 2005 Environmental and Resource Economics. 30 313-325

59. Navrud, S. Pricing the European Environment. 1992 Scandinavian University Press: Oslo
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
60. Olsson, C., 1993. Linbanan i Norsjö – En skogsinriktad turistattraktion. En undersökning av betalningsvilja för att uppleva skog och natur (The cable car in Norsjö – a forest based tourist attraction). Master, Handelshögskolan i Umeå.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

61. Ovaskainen, V. ; Kniivilä, M. Consumer versus citizen preferences in contingent valuation: evidence on the role of question framing. 2005 Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 49 379-394

62. Pattanayak, S.K., Wing, J.M., Depro, B.M., van Houtven, G., de Civita, P., Stieb, D.M., Hubbel, B., 2002. International Health Benefits Transfer Application Tool: The Use of PPP and inflation indices. Prepared for Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division, Health Canada.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

63. Pouta, E. Attitude and belief questions as a source of context effect in a contingent valuation survey. 2004 Journal of Economic Psychology. 25 229-242

64. Pouta, E. Sensitivity to scope of environmental regulation in contingent valuation of forest cutting practices in Finland. 2005 Forest Policy and Economics. 7 539-550

65. Pouta, E. ; Rekola, M. ; Kuuluvainen, J. ; Li, C.Z. ; Tahvonen, I. Willingness to pay in different policy-planning methods: insights into respondents’ decision-making processes. 2002 Ecological Economics. 40 295-311

66. Pouta, E. ; Rekola, M. ; Kuuluvainen, J. ; Tahvonen, O. ; Li, C.Z. Contingent valuation of the Natura 2000 nature conservation programme in Finland. 2000 Forestry. 73 119-128
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
67. Pouta, E., 2003. Attitude-behavior framework in contingent valuation of forest conservation. Ph.D., University of Helsinki.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
68. Pouta, E., Rekola, M., 2005. Meta analysis of forest valuation studies. Working paper (In Finnish).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

69. Quiggin, J. Individual and household willingness to pay for public goods. 1998 American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 80 58-63

70. Rabin, M. Psychology and Economics. 1998 Journal of Economic Literature. XXXVI 11-46

71. Rekola, M. ; Pouta, E. Public preferences for uncertain regeneration cuttings: a contingent valuation experiment involving Finnish private forests. 2005 Forest Policy and Economics. 7 635-649

72. Rekola, M. ; Pouta, E. ; Kuuluvainen, J. ; Tahvonen, O. ; Li, C.Z. Incommensurable preferences in contingent valuation: the case of Natura 2000 Network in Finland. 2000 Environmental Conservation. 27 260-268
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

73. Rosenberger, R. ; Loomis, J. Panel stratification in meta-analysis of economic studies: an investigation of its effects in the recreation valuation literature. 2000 Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 32 131-149

74. Rosenberger, R.S. ; Loomis, J.B. Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer: in-sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database. 2000 Water Resources Research. 36 1097-1107
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
75. Sandsbråten, L., 1997. Verdsetting av miljøgoder i Oslomarka: en betinget verdsettingsundersøkelse i privat og kommunal skog i Indre Oslomarka (Valuation of environmental goods in Oslomarka: a contingent valuation survey of private and municipality owned forest in inner Oslomarka). Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

76. Sayman, S. ; Öncüler, A. Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA–WTP disparity: a meta analytical framework. 2005 Journal of Economic Psychology. 26 289-312

77. Schläpfer, F. Survey protocol and income effects in the contingent valuation of public goods: a meta-analysis. 2006 Ecological Economics. 57 415-429

78. Shrestha, R.K. ; Loomis, J.B. Meta-analytic benefit transfer of outdoor recreation economic values: testing out-of-sample convergent validity. 2003 Environmental & Resource Economics. 25 79-100

79. Shrestha, R.K. ; Loomis, J.B. Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation. 2001 Ecological Economics. 39 67-83

80. Simensen, K., Wind, M., 1990. Holdninger til og betalingsvillighet for ulike skogbehandlinger i fjellskog: En empirisk undersøkelse av hirkjølen statsallmenning (attitudes and wtp for different forestry practices in mountainous forests: a survey of the hirkjolen common). Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
81. Skagestad, E., 1996. Friluftsliv og Skogbruk – En spørreundersøkelse blant turgjengere i ytre Oslomarka, Romeriksåsen, på vinterstid (Recreation and forestry – a survey of hikers in the outer Oslomarka, Romeriksåsen, in the winter time). Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

82. Smith, V.K. ; Kaoru, Y. Signals or noise – explaining the variation in recreation benefit estimates. 1990 American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 72 419-433

83. Smith, V.K. ; Osborne, L.L. Do contingent valuation estimates pass a ‘‘scope’’ test? A meta-analysis. 1996 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 31 287-301

84. Smith, V.K. ; Pattanayak, S.K. Is meta-analysis a Noah's Ark for non-market valuation?. 2002 Environmental and Resource Economics. 22 271-296

85. Stanley, T.D. Wheat from chaff: meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. 2001 Journal of Economic Perspectives. 15 131-150

86. Stanley, T.D. ; Jarrel, S.D. Meta-regression analysis: a quantitative method of literature surveys. 2005 Journal of Economic Surveys. 19 299-308

87. Strand, J. Individual and household values of mortality reductions with intrahousehold bargaining. 2005 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 31 217-236

88. Strand, J., Wahl, T.S., 1997. Verdsetting av kommunale friområder i Oslo: en betinget verdsettingsstudie (Valuation of Municipality Recreation Areas in Oslo: A Contingent Valuation Study). SNF Report 82/97.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
89. Sundberg, S., Söderqvist, T., 2004. The economic value of environmental change in Sweden: a survey of studies. Report 5360, Naturvårdsverket.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
90. Tyrväinen, L. Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland. 2001 Journal of Environmental Management. 62 75-92
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
91. Tyrväinen, L. ; Väänänen, H. The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method. 1998 Landscape and Urban Planning. 43 105-118
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
92. Vatn, A., Framstad, E., Solberg, B., 2005. Tiltak og virkemidler for vern av biodiversitet i skog og våtmarker. Rapport TemaNord 2005, Nordisk Ministerråd, København.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
93. Veisten, K. ; Hoen, H.F. ; Navrud, S. ; Strand, J. Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities. 2004 Journal of Environmental Management. 73 317-331
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

94. Veisten, K. ; Hoen, H.F. ; Strand, J. Sequencing and the adding-up property in contingent valuation of endangered species: are contingent non-use values economic values?. 2004 Environmental and Resource Economics. 29 419-433

95. Veisten, K. ; Navrud, S. Contingent valuation and actual payment for voluntarily provided passive-use values: assessing the effect of an induced truth-telling mechanism and elicitation formats. 2006 Applied Economics. 38 735-756

96. Veisten, K., 1993. Samfunnsøkonomisk verdsetting av å oppretthalde artsmangfaldet i norske skogar: med testing for feilkilder ved betinga verdsetting (Social valuation of the preserving biodiversity in Norwegian forests: with multiple bias testing). Master Thesis, University of Oslo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
97. Veisten, K., Hoen, H.F., 1994. Om haldningar til – og betalingsvilje for endringar i skogbehandlinga i Noreg: resultat frå to nasjonale undersøkingar (On attitudes and WTP for changes in forest practices in Norway: results from two national surveys). Skogforsk 4/94, Skogforsk.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

98. Veisten, K., Hoen, H.F., Navrud, S., Strand, J., 1993. Valuing biodiversity in Norwegian forests: a contingent valuation study with multiple bias testing. Memo No. 7, Department of Economics, University of Oslo.

99. Walsh, R.G. ; Johnson, D.M. ; McKean, J.R. Issues in non-market valuation and policy application: a retrospective glance. 1989 Western Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1 178-188

100. Walsh, R.G. ; Johnson, D.M. ; McKean, J.R. Nonmarket values from two decades of research on recreation demand. 1990 En : . JAI Press: Greenwich, CT
     Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
     

101. Woodward, R.T. ; Wui, Y.-S. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. 2001 Ecological Economics. 37 257-270

1. How well do couples know their partners’ preferences? Experimental evidence from joint recreation. (2024). Mariel, Petr ; Boto-Garca, David.
   In: Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics.
   RePEc:spr:epolit:v:41:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40888-024-00346-x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. A model of household shared parking decisions incorporating equity-seeking household dynamics and leadership personality traits. (2023). Feng, Tao ; Yan, Qianqian ; Timmermans, Harry.
   In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
   RePEc:eee:transa:v:169:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423000058.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Food choice behavior of adolescents under parent-child interaction in the context of US school lunch programs. (2023). Roe, Brian ; Howard, Gregory ; Panchalingam, Thadchaigeni ; Klaiber, Allen H.
   In: Food Policy.
   RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:115:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223000180.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Intra-household bargaining for a joint vacation. (2023). Mariel, Petr ; Baos-Pino, Jose Francisco ; Boto-Garcia, David.
   In: Journal of choice modelling.
   RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:47:y:2023:i:c:s175553452300009x.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Stated preference modelling of intra-household decisions: Can you more easily approximate the preference space?. (2019). Beck, Matthew J ; Rose, John M.
   In: Transportation.
   RePEc:kap:transp:v:46:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-017-9822-y.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Pricing Inputs and Outputs: Market prices versus shadow prices, market power, and welfare analysis. (2018). Sickles, Robin ; Kutlu, Levent ; Bhattacharyya, Aditi.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:ecl:riceco:18-009.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. INTRA€ HOUSEHOLD EXPERIMENTS: A SURVEY. (2018). Munro, Alistair.
   In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
   RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:32:y:2018:i:1:p:134-175.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Couples Labor Supply, Taxes, and the Division of Housework in a Gender-Neutral Lab. (2016). Schröder, Melanie ; Burow, Norma ; Schroder, Melanie .
   In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
   RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp1593.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Cultural Influence on Preferences and Attitudes for Environmental Quality. (2016). Kountouris, Yiannis ; Remoundou, Kyriaki.
   In: Kyklos.
   RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:69:y:2016:i:2:p:369-397.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. A Study of Intra-household and Gender Differences in Risk Preferences and Their Effect on Household Investment Decisions in Rural Cameroon. (2016). Gonzalez-Ramirez, Jimena ; Meriggi, Niccolo.
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts.
    RePEc:ags:aaea16:236078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Social Norms or Income Taxation - What Drives Couples Labor Supply? Experimental Evidence. (2014). Schröder, Melanie ; Burow, Norma ; Brunn, Claudia ; Mantei, Britta ; Schmitt, Norma ; Schroder, Melanie .
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc14:100375.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Household Decision Making and Valuation of Environmental Health Risks to Parents and Their Children. (2014). Veronesi, Marcella ; Dickie, Mark ; Adamowicz, Wiktor ; Gerking, Shelby ; Zinner, David.
    In: Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/679255.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Income Taxation and Labor Supply: An Experiment on Couples Work Effort. (2013). Brunn, Claudia ; Heynemann, Britta ; Schmitt, Norma ; Schroder, Melanie .
    In: VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc13:79735.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Considering household size in contingent valuation studies. (2013). schneider, friedrich ; Ahlheim, Michael.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:62898.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Household Decision-Making and Valuation of Environmental Health Risks to Parents and their Children. (2013). Veronesi, Marcella ; Dickie, Mark ; Adamowicz, Wiktor ; Zinner, David ; Gerking, Shelby.
    In: NCEE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:nev:wpaper:wp201306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Determinants of Flash Flood Evacuation Choices and Assessment of Preferences for Flash Flood Warning Channels: The Case of Thailand. (2013). Thampanishvong, Kannika.
    In: EEPSEA Research Report.
    RePEc:eep:report:rr2013034.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Household Decision-Making and Valuation of Environmental Health Risks to Parents and their Children. (2013). Adamowicz, Wiktor ; Dickie, Mark ; Veronesi, Marcella ; Gerking, Shelby ; Zinner, David.
    In: National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:nceewp:280916.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Experimental auctions, collective induction and choice shift: Willingness-to-pay for rice quality in Senegal. (2012). Verbeke, Wim ; Demont, Matty ; Rutsaert, Pieter ; Seck, Papa Abdoulaye ; Ndour, Maimouna ; Tollens, Eric.
    In: 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil.
    RePEc:ags:iaae12:126861.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Individual and couple decision behavior under risk: evidence on the dynamics of power balance. (2011). Ziegelmeyer, Anthony ; Picard, Nathalie ; de Palma, André.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:70:y:2011:i:1:p:45-64.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Who counts in evaluating the effects of air pollution policies on households? Non-market valuation in the presence of dependencies. (2011). Smith, V. ; Evans, Mary ; Poulos, Christine.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:62:y:2011:i:1:p:65-79.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Western Households Water Knowledge, Preferences, and Willingness to Pay. (2010). Thorvaldson, Jennifer ; Pritchett, James ; Goemans, Christopher.
    In: Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.
    RePEc:bla:canjag:v:58:y:2010:i:s1:p:497-514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Who Counts in Evaluating the Effects of Air Pollution Policies on Households? Non-Market Valuation in the Presence of Dependencies. (2009). Smith, V. ; Evans, Mary ; Poulos, Christine.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:15366.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Asking for Individual or Household Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods?. (2009). Navrud, Stale ; Lindhjem, Henrik.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:43:y:2009:i:1:p:11-29.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Individual and couple decision behavior under risk: Evidence on the dynamics of power balance. (2009). Ziegelmeyer, Anthony ; Picard, Nathalie ; de Palma, André.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00418899.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Intergenerational Transmission of Healthy Eating Behaviour and the Role of Household Income. (2008). Mavromaras, Kostas ; Smith, Murray ; Goode, Alison.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp3535.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. Extensions of the Traditional Travel Cost Model of Non-Market Valuation to a Collective Framework: Evidence from the Field. (2007). Veronesi, Marcella ; Perali, Federico ; Menon, Martina.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ver:wpaper:42/2007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. 20 years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: A meta-analysis. (2007). Lindhjem, Henrik.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:12:y:2007:i:4:p:251-277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-01 04:42:54 || Missing content? Let us know