create a website

Is it more convenient to waste? Trade‐offs between grocery shopping and waste behaviors. (2022). , Norbert ; Fan, Linlin ; Ellison, Brenna.
In: Agricultural Economics.
RePEc:bla:agecon:v:53:y:2022:i:s1:p:75-89.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 56

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Household food waste and the opportunity cost of time. (2024). Paroissien, Emmanuel ; NEBOUT, Antoine ; Beatty, Timothy.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:216:y:2024:i:c:s0921800923002756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Retail food environment and household food waste: An empirical study. (2023). Miao, Ruiqing ; Li, Wenying ; Cuffey, Joel ; Yu, Yang.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:117:y:2023:i:c:s0306919223000556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1998). Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 64–75.

  2. Anekwe, T. D., & Zeballos, E. (2019). Food‐related time use: Changes and demographic differences (Economic Information Bulletin No. 213). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Bawa, K., & Ghosh, A. (1999). A model of household grocery shopping behavior. Marketing Letters, 10(s), 149–160.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Belavina, E. (2016). The structure of grocery retail markets and food waste [Working paper no. 16‐23]. Chicago Booth. https://www.chicagobooth.edu/research/rustandy/social‐impact‐research/research‐papers/2016/the‐structure‐of‐grocery‐retail‐markets‐and‐food‐waste.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Bellemare, M. F., Çakir, M., Peterson, H. H., Novak, L., & Rudi, J. (2017). On the measurement of food waste. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(5), 1148–1158.

  6. Bender, K. E., Badiger, A., Roe, B. E., Shu, Y., & Qi, D. (2021). Consumer behavior during the COVID‐19 pandemic: An analysis of food purchasing and management behaviors in U.S. households through the lens of food system resilience. Socio‐Economic Planning Sciences, in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. BLS. (2021). Consumer expenditure surveys: CE tables. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). https://www.bls.gov/cex/tables.htm.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Boxall, P. C., & Adamowicz, W. L. (2002). Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23, 421–446.

  9. Buzby, J. C., Wells, H. F., & Hyman, J. (2014). The estimated amount, value, and calories of postharvest food losses at the retail and consumer levels in the United States (Economic Information Bulletin No. 121). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

  10. Chenarides, L., Grebitus, C., Lusk, J. L., & Printezis, I. (2021). Food consumption behavior during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Agribusiness, 37, 44–81.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Ellison, B., & Lusk, J. L. (2018). Examining household food waste decisions: A vignette approach. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(4), 613–631.

  12. Ellison, B., & Ocepek, M. (2020). Household food acquisition behaviors during Covid‐19. Farmdoc Daily, 10, 191. https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2020/10/household‐food‐acquisition‐behaviors‐during‐covid‐19.html.

  13. Ellison, B., & Prescott, M. P. (2021). Examining nutrition and food waste trade‐offs using an obesity prevention context. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 53(5), 434–444.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Ellison, B., Mcfadden, B., Rickard, B. J., & Wilson, N. L. W. (2021). Examining food purchase behavior and food values during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(1), 58–72.

  15. Ellison, B., Muth, M. K., & Golan, E. (2019). Opportunities and challenges in conducting economic research on food loss and waste. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 41(1), 1–19.

  16. Graham‐Rowe, E., Jessop, D. C., & Sparks, P. (2014). Identifying motivations and barriers to minimising household food waste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 84, 15–23.

  17. Grant, K., Gallardo, R. K., & McCluskey, J. J. (2019). Are consumers willing to pay to reduce food waste? Choices, 34(1), 1–7.

  18. Grashuis, J., Skevas, T., & Segovia, M. S. (2020). Grocery shopping preferences during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Sustainability, 12, 5369.

  19. Greene, W. H., & Hensher, D. A. (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(8), 681–698.

  20. Gunders, D. (2012). Wasted: How America is losing up to 40 percent of its food from farm to fork to landfill [Issue paper:12‐06‐B]. Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/wasted‐food‐IP.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Hanley, N., Wright, R. E., & Adamowicz, V. (1998). Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3‐4), 413–428.

  22. Hoover, D. (2017). Estimating quantities and types of food waste at the city level (NRDC Report No. R‐17‐09‐B), https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/food‐waste‐city‐level‐report.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Hu, W. (2004). Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(3), 389–408.

  24. Jörissen, J., Priefer, C., & Bräutigam, K.‐R. (2015). Food waste generation at household level: Results of a survey among employees of two European research centers in Italy and Germany. Sustainability, 7(3), 2695–2715.

  25. Just, D. R. (2014). Introduction to behavioral economics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Just, D. R., & Gabrielyan, G. (2016). Food and consumer behavior: Why the details matter. Agricultural Economics, 47(S1), 73–83.

  27. Krinsky, I., & Robb, A. L. (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 715–719.

  28. Landry, C. E., & Smith, T. A. (2018). Demand for household food waste. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 41(1), 20–36.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Ligon, V. K. (2014). Shop more, buy less: A qualitative investigation into consumer decisions that lead to food waste in U.S. households. https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/332880.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Maples, J. G., Lusk, J. L., & Peel, D. S. (2018). Unintended consequences of the quest for increased efficiency in beef cattle: When bigger isn't better. Food Policy, 74, 65–73.

  31. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In (P. Zarembka Eds.), Frontiers of Econometrics. Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Milne, R. (2013). Arbiters of waste: Date labels, the consumer and knowing good, safe food. The Sociological Review, 60, 84–101.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  33. Morey, E. R. (1999). TWO RUMs uncloaked: Nested‐logit models of site choice and nested‐logit models of participation and site choice. In J. A. Herriges & C. L. Kling (Eds.), Valuing recreation and the environment. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  34. Neff, R. A., Spiker, M. L., & Truant, P. L. (2015). Wasted food: U.S. consumers’ reported awareness, attitudes, and behaviors. Plos One, 10(6), e0127881.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Nikolaus, C. J., Nickols‐Richardson, S. M., & Ellison, B. (2018). Wasted food: A qualitative study of U.S. young adults’ perceptions, beliefs, and behaviors. Appetite, 130, 70–78.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Nilsson, T., Foster, K., & Lusk, J. L. (2006). Marketing opportunities for certified pork chops. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54(4), 567–583.

  37. Ortega, D. L., Wang, H. H., Wu, L., & Olynk, N. J. (2011). Modeling heterogeneity in consumer preferences for select food safety attributes in China. Food Policy, 36(2), 318–324.

  38. Qi, D., & Roe, B. E. (2016). Household food waste: Multivariate regression and principal components analyses of awareness and attitudes among U.S. consumers. Plos One, 11(7), e0159250.

  39. Quested, T. E., Marsh, E., Stunell, D., & Parry, A. D. (2013). Spaghetti soup: The complex world of food waste behaviors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 79, 43–51.

  40. Rees, J. (2013). The huge chill: Why are American refrigerators so big? The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/10/the‐huge‐chill‐why‐are‐american‐refrigerators‐so‐big/280275/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. ReFED. (2016). A roadmap to reduce U.S. food waste by 20 percent. https://www.refed.com/downloads/ReFED_Report_2016.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Schanes, K., Dobernig, K., & Gözet, B. (2018). Food waste matters––a systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 978–991.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Schulz, L. L., & Tonsor, G. T. (2010). Cow‐calf producer preferences for voluntary traceability systems. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(1), 138–162.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Small, K. A., & Rosen, H. S. (1981). Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica, 49(1), 105–130.

  45. Smith, T. A., & Landry, C. E. (2021). Household food waste and inefficiencies in food production. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103(1), 4–21.

  46. Stancu, V., Haugaard, P., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2016). Determinants of consumer food waste behavior: Two routes to food waste. Appetite, 96, 7–17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Stefan, V., Van Herpen, E., Tudoran, A. A., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2013). Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: The importance of planning and shopping routines. Food Quality and Preference, 28, 375–381.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Swait, J. (1994). A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross‐sectional revealed preference choice data. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 1(2), 77–89.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Thyberg, K. L., & Tonjes, D. J. (2016). Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 106, 110–123.

  50. Vokurka, R. J., & Davis, R. A. (1996). Just‐in‐time: The evolution of a philosophy. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 37(2), 56–59.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Vokurka, R. J., & Lummus, R. R. (2000). The role of just‐in‐time in supply chain management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 11(1), 89–98.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Williams, H., Wikström, F., Otterbring, T., Löfgren, M., & Gustafsson, A. (2012). Reasons for household food waste with special attention to packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 24, 141–148.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Wilson, N. L. W., Miao, R., & Weis, C. S. (2019). When in doubt throw it out! The complicated decision to consume (or waste) food by date labels. Choices, 34(1), 1–7.

  54. Wilson, N. L. W., Rickard, B. J., Saputo, R., & Ho, S.‐T. (2017). Food waste: The role of date labels, package size, and product category. Food Quality and Preference, 55, 35–44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Xue, L., Liu, G., Parfitt, J., Liu, X., Van Herpen, E., Stenmarck, Å., O'connor, C., Östergren, K., & Cheng, S. (2017). Missing food, missing data? A critical review of global food losses and food waste data. Environmental Science and Technology, 51, 6618–6633.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  56. Yu, Y., & Jaenicke, E. C. (2020). Estimating food waste as household production inefficiency. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 102(2), 525–547.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Demand response to improved walking infrastructure: A study into the economics of walking and health behaviour change. (2015). Hunter, Ruth F ; Tully, Mark A ; Hutchinson, George W ; Kee, Frank ; Longo, Alberto.
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:143:y:2015:i:c:p:107-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Valuing type and scope of ecosystem conservation: A meta-analysis. (2015). HUSSAIN, Anwar ; Phillips, Spencer ; Hjerpe, Evan.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:32-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-offs among Conservation Attributes. (2014). Dissanayake, Sahan ; Ando, Amy ; Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:ii:1:p:237-259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The influence of individuals in forming collective household preferences for water quality. (2014). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Thiene, Mara ; Rungie, Cam.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:68:y:2014:i:1:p:161-174.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Effects of Intertemporal Considerations on Consumer Preferences for Biofuels. (2013). Khachatryan, Hayk ; casavant, ken ; Joireman, Jeff.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:150334.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. How Can Behavioral Economics Inform Nonmarket Valuation? An Example from the Preference Reversal Literature. (2011). List, John ; Alevy, Jonathan ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:87:y:2011:iii:1:p:365-381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The Equity-Efficiency Trade-off in Environmental Policy: Evidence from Stated Preferences. (2010). Atkinson, Giles ; Dietz, Simon.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:86:y:2010:iii:1:p423-443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Preferences for long-term care services: Willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. (2010). Koolman, Xander ; Stolk, Elly A. ; Nieboer, Anna P..
    In: Social Science & Medicine.
    RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:9:p:1317-1325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Identifying Consumer Preferences for Nutrition Information on Grocery Store Shelf Labels. (2009). McCluskey, Jill ; Chouinard, Hayley ; Berning, Joshua ; Manning, Kenneth ; Sprott, David.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:uconnr:149962.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Sequencing Anomalies in Choice Experiments. (2008). pinto-prades, jose-luis ; Pintoprades, Jose Luis ; Day, Brett.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:pab:wpaper:08.10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose ; Kilkuwe, Enoch.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. When more is less: the effect of multiple health and nutritional labels in food product choice. (2008). de Magistris, Tiziana ; Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús ; de-Magistris, T. ; Barreiro-Hurle, J. ; Gracia, A..
    In: 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium.
    RePEc:ags:eaae08:44013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Modeling Yeah- and Nay-Saying to Alternatives in Conjoint Experiments. (2008). Hu, Wuyang.
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6346.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Optimizing Farmland Preservation Choices Across Communities and Jurisdictional Scales: To What Extent are Amenity Values and Selection Criteria Transferable?. (2008). Johnston, Robert ; Duke, Joshua ; Kukielka, Jessica G..
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6243.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. What Determines Prediction Errors In Benefits Transfer Models?. (2007). Hanley, Nick ; Colombo, Sergio.
    In: 81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK.
    RePEc:ags:aes007:7967.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Public Funding of Environmental Amenities: Contingent Choices Using New Taxes or Existing Revenues for Coastal Land Conservation. (2006). Swallow, Stephen ; McGonagle, Michael P..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:82:y:2006:i:1:p:56-67.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Uncovering the Macrostructure of Tourists’ Preferences. A Choice Experiment Analysis of Tourism Demand to Sardinia. (2006). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Opportunities to Improve Household Food Security Through Promoting Informal Maize Marketing Channels: Experience from Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. (2006). Traub, Lulama ; Jayne, Thomas.
    In: Food Security International Development Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:midiwp:54568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. HYPOTHETICAL (NON)BIAS IN CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: EVIDENCE FROM FRESHWATER PRAWNS. (2005). Hudson, Darren ; Gallardo, R. Karina ; Hanson, Terry .
    In: Experimental.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpex:0503003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Preferences regarding road transports of hazardous materials using choice experiments - any sign of biases?. (2005). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2005_030.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-05q30001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Uncovering the macrostructure of tourists preferences. A choice experiment analysis of tourism demand to Sardinia. (2005). Cao, Davide ; Brau, Rinaldo.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Exploring Consumer Valuation and Preference Heterogeneity for Functional Foods Using a Choice Experiment: A Case Study of Tomato Juice Containing Soy in Ohio. (2005). Hooker, Neal ; Teratanavat, Ratapol.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19556.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A Battle of Taste and Environmental Convictions for Ecolabeled Seafood: A Choice Experiment. (2005). Roheim, Cathy ; Johnston, Robert.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. HECKIT MODELLING OF THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAY AND TOURISM EXPENDITURES. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2004-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Using Choice Experiments to Assess Peoples Preferences for Railway Transports of Hazardous Materials. (2004). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2004_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. WHO ARE RESOURCE NONUSERS AND WHAT CAN THEY TELL US ABOUT NONUSE VALUES? AN APPLICATION TO COASTAL WETLAND RESTORATION. (2004). Opaluch, James ; Johnston, Robert ; Mazzotta, Marisa J. ; Magnusson, Gisele .
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. THE VALUE OF THE VIEW: VALUING SCENIC QUALITY USING CHOICE AND CONTINGENT VALUATION MODELS. (2004). Kask, Susan ; Stewart, Steve ; Mathews, Leah Greden.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. AN APPLICATION OF CHOICE MODELING TO MEASURE U.S. CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. A CHOICE EXPERIMENT MODEL FOR BEEF ATTRIBUTES: WHAT CONSUMER PREFERENCES TELL US. (2004). Umberger, Wendy ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19931.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Preferences for Alternative Moose Management Regimes among Finnish Landowners: A Choice Experiment Approach. (2003). Horne, Paula ; Petajisto, Leena .
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:79:y:2003:i:4:p:472-482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Using Stated Preference Methods for Biodiversity Valuation. A critical analysis. (2003). Froer, Oliver.
    In: Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim.
    RePEc:hoh:hohdip:217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The Value of Road and Railway Safety - an Overview. (2003). Hiselius, Lena Winslott.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2003_013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Spatial Factors and Stated Preference Values for Public Goods: Considerations for Rural Land Use. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie.
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:4:p:481-500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Comparing Choice Question Formats for Evaluating Natural Resource Tradeoffs. (2002). Breffle, William S. ; Rowe, Robert D..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:78:y:2002:i:2:p:298-314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Broadband delivered entertainment services: forecasting Australian subscription intentions. (2002). Savage, Scott ; Madden, Gary ; Simpson, Michael.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:10915.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. STATED PREFERENCES AND LENGTH OF RESIDENCY IN RURAL COMMUNITIES: ARE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION VALUES HETEROGENEOUS?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana Marie.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Risk Perception of Traffic Participants. (2001). van Vuuren, Daniel ; Blaeij, Adriana ; de Blaeij, Arianne.
    In: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:tin:wpaper:20010027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Complements, Substitutes, Budget Constraints and Valuation. (2000). Hailu, Atakelty ; Boxall, Peter ; Adamowicz, Wiktor.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:1:p:51-68.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL LAND USE PATTERNS ON RURAL AMENITY VALUES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A CONTINGENT CHOICE SURVEY. (2000). Swallow, Stephen ; Johnston, Robert ; Bauer, Dana M..
    In: 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea00:21766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Valuing Multiple Programs to Improve Fish Populations. (1999). Plummer, Mark L. ; Brown, Gardner ; Layton, David F..
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics at the University of Washington.
    RePEc:fth:washer:0042.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-10-04 18:04:33 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.