create a website

On the willingness to pay for food sustainability labelling: A meta‐analysis. (2024). Santeramo, Fabio ; Lamonaca, Emilia ; Boncinelli, Fabio ; Casini, Leonardo ; Piracci, Giovanna.
In: Agricultural Economics.
RePEc:bla:agecon:v:55:y:2024:i:2:p:329-345.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 2

Citations received by this document

Cites: 96

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The Impact of the EU Deforestation Regulation on Cocoa - Markets, Trade and Forest Conservation. (2025). Boysen, Ole.
    In: JRC Working Papers on Economic Analysis of Policies for Africa.
    RePEc:ipt:eapoaf:202507.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Are university students really hungry for sustainability? A choice experiment on new food products from circular economy. (2024). Caracciolo, Francesco ; Califano, Giovanbattista ; Pilone, Vittoria ; di Santo, Naomi ; Sisto, Roberta.
    In: Agricultural and Food Economics.
    RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:12:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-024-00315-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Akaichi, F., Revoredo‐Giha, C., Glenk, K., & Gil, J. M. (2020). How consumers in the UK and Spain value the coexistence of the claims low fat, local, organic and low greenhouse gas emissions. Nutrients, 12(1), 120.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Aoki, K., Akai, K., Ujiie, K., Shimmura, T., & Nishino, N. (2019). The impact of information on taste ranking and cultivation method on rice types that protect endangered birds in Japan: Non‐hypothetical choice experiment with tasting. Food Quality and Preference, 75(April 2018), 28–38.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Ardeshiri, A., & Rose, J. M. (2018). How Australian consumers value intrinsic and extrinsic attributes of beef products. Food Quality and Preference, 65(October 2017), 146–163.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Asche, F., Larsen, T. A., Smith, M. D., Sogn‐Grundvåg, G., & Young, J. A. (2015). Pricing of eco‐labels with retailer heterogeneity. Food Policy, 53, 82–93.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Aschemann‐Witzel, J., & Zielke, S. (2017). Can't buy me green? A review of consumer perceptions of and behavior toward the price of organic food. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 51(1), 211–251.

  6. Asioli, D., Aschemann‐Witzel, J., & Nayga, R. M. (2020). Sustainability‐related food labels. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 1–15.

  7. Bangsa, A. B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2020). Linking sustainable product attributes and consumer decision‐making: Insights from a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245(2), 118902.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., Swinnen, J., & Zilberman, D. (2022). Agri‐food value chain revolutions in low‐and middle‐income countries. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(4), 1316–1377.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Bastounis, A., Buckell, J., Hartmann‐boyce, J., Cook, B., King, S., Potter, C., Bianchi, F., Rayner, M., & Jebb, S. A. (2021). The impact of environmental sustainability labels on willingness‐to‐pay for foods: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of discrete choice experiments. Nutrients, 13(8), 2677.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Bello, M., & Abdulai, A. (2016). Impact of ex‐ante hypothetical bias mitigation methods on attribute non‐attendance in choice experiments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 98(5), 1486–1506.

  11. Bhavsar, A., Diallo, C., & Ülkü, M. A. (2021). Towards sustainable development : Optimal pricing and sales strategies for retailing fair trade products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 124990.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Bonnet, C., Bouamra‐Mechemache, Z., Réquillart, V., & Treich, N. (2020). Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare. Food Policy, 97, 101847.

  13. Bougherara, D., & Combris, P. (2009). Eco‐labelled food products: What are consumers paying for? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36(3), 321–341.

  14. Burnier, P. C., Spers, E. E., & de Barcellos, M. D. (2021). Role of sustainability attributes and occasion matters in determining consumers’ beef choice. Food Quality and Preference, 88, 104075.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Capitello, R., & Sirieix, L. (2020). What does ‘sustainable wine’ mean? An investigation of French and Italian wine consumers. In S. L. Forbes, T.‐A. De Silva, & A. J. Gilinsky (Eds.), Social Sustainability in the Global Wine Industry (pp. 137–154). Palgrave Pivot.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Caputo, V., Nayga, R. M., & Scarpa, R. (2013). Food miles or carbon emissions? Exploring labelling preference for food transport footprint with a stated choice study. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 57(4), 465–482.

  17. Charry, A., Narjes, M., Enciso, K., Peters, M., & Burkart, S. (2019). Sustainable intensification of beef production in Colombia—Chances for product differentiation and price premiums. Agricultural and Food Economics, 7(1), 1–18.

  18. Clark, B., Stewart, G. B., Panzone, L. A., Kyriazakis, I., & Frewer, L. J. (2017). Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: A meta‐analysis of willingness‐to‐pay studies. Food Policy, 68, 112–127.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Contini, C., Boncinelli, F., Romano, C., Scozzafava, G., & Casini, L. (2019). Price vector issue in a choice experiment: A methodological proposal. Food Quality and Preference, 75(February), 23–27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Dahlhausen, J. L., Rungie, C., & Roosen, J. (2018). Value of labeling credence attributes—common structures and individual preferences. Agricultural Economics, 49(6), 741–751.

  21. de Boer, J. (2003). Sustainability labelling schemes: The logic of their claims and their functions for stakeholders. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(4), 254–264.

  22. Dendler, L. (2014). Sustainability Meta Labelling: An effective measure to facilitate more sustainable consumption and production? Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 74–83.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Deselnicu, O. C., Costanigro, M., Souza‐Monteiro, D. M., & McFadden, D. T. (2013). A meta‐analysis of geographical indication food valuation studies: What drives the premium for origin‐based labels? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 38(2), 204–219.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Dolgopolova, I., & Teuber, R. (2018). Consumers’ willingness to pay for health benefits in food products: A meta‐analysis. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(2), 333–352.

  25. Ecolabel Index. (2022). The Ecolabel Index. Retrieved July 22, 2022, from https://www.ecolabelindex.com/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Press Publication.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. European Commission. (2020a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally‐friendly food system. 5(1), 55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. European Commission. (2020b). Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Group of Chief Scientific Advisors, Towards a sustainable food system Moving from food as a commodity to food as more of a common good Independent expert report, Publications Office, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/282386.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. FAO—Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. (2018). Sustainable food systems: Concept and framework. FAO.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Fitzsimmons, J., & Cicia, G. (2018). Different tubers for different consumers: Heterogeneity in human values and willingness to pay for social outcomes of potato credence attributes. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 9(4), 354–374.

  31. Fogt Jacobsen, L., Pedersen, S., & Thøgersen, J. (2022). Drivers of and barriers to consumers’ plastic packaging waste avoidance and recycling—A systematic literature review. Waste Management, 141, 63–78.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Grebitus, C., Peschel, A. O., & Hughner, R. S. (2018). Voluntary food labeling: The additive effect of “free from” labels and region of origin. Agribusiness, 34(4), 714–727.

  33. Gross, S., Waldrop, M. E., & Roosen, J. (2021). How does animal welfare taste? Combining sensory and choice experiments to evaluate willingness to pay for animal welfare pork. Food Quality and Preference, 87(March 2020), 104055.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014). Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy, 44, 177–189.

  35. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Havránek, T., Stanley, T. D., Doucouliagos, H., Bom, P., Geyer‐Klingeberg, J., Iwasaki, I., Reed, R. W., Rost, K., & van Aert, R. C. M. (2020). Reporting guidelines for meta‐analysis in economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34, 469–475.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2015). Applied choice analysis. Cambridge University Press.

  38. Hinkes, C., & Schulze‐Ehlers, B. (2018). Consumer attitudes and preferences towards pangasius and tilapia: The role of sustainability certification and the country of origin. Appetite, 127(April), 171–181.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Hoekman, B., & Sabel, C. (2019). Open plurilateral agreements, international regulatory cooperation and the WTO. Global Policy, 10(3), 297–312.

  40. Janssen, D., & Langen, N. (2017). The bunch of sustainability labels—Do consumers differentiate? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 1233–1245.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2012). Product labelling in the market for organic food: Consumer preferences and willingness‐to‐pay for different organic certification logos. Food Quality and Preference, 25(1), 9–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Katt, F., & Meixner, O. (2020). A systematic review of drivers influencing consumer willingness to pay for organic food. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 100(April), 374–388.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Klaiman, K., Ortega, D. L., & Garnache, C. (2016). Consumer preferences and demand for packaging material and recyclability. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 115, 1–8.

  44. Koistinen, L., Pouta, E., Heikkilä, J., Forsman‐Hugg, S., Kotro, J., Mäkelä, J., & Niva, M. (2013). The impact of fat content, production methods and carbon footprint information on consumer preferences for minced meat. Food Quality and Preference, 29(2), 126–136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Lernoud, J., Potts, J., Sampson, G., Schlatter, B., Huppe, G., Voora, V., Willer, H., Wozniak, J., & Dang, D. (2018). The state of sustainable markets—Statistics and emerging trends 2018. ITC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Li, S., & Kallas, Z. (2021). Meta‐analysis of consumers ’ willingness to pay for sustainable food products. Appetite, 163, 105239.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Li, X., Jensen, K. L., Lambert, D. M., & Clark, C. D. (2018). Consequentiality beliefs and consumer valuation of extrinsic attributes in beef. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 50(1), 1–26.

  48. Lim, K. H., Hu, W., & Nayga, R. M. (2018). Is Marine Stewardship Council's ecolabel a rising tide for all? Consumers’ willingness to pay for origin‐differentiated ecolabeled canned tuna. Marine Policy, 96(October 2017), 18–26.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Lusk, J. L. (2018). Separating myth from reality: An analysis of socially acceptable credence attributes. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10, 65–82.

  51. Lusk, J. L. (2019). Consumer preferences for cage‐free eggs and impacts of retailer pledges. Agribusiness, 35(2), 129–148.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Lusk, J. L., Jamal, M., Kurlander, L., Roucan, M., & Taulman, L. (2005). A meta‐analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 30(1), 28–44.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Lusk, J. L., Nilsson, T., & Foster, K. (2007). Public preferences and private choices: Effect of altruism and free riding on demand for environmentally certified pork. Environmental and Resource Economics, 36(4), 499–521.

  54. Lusk, J., & Schroeder, T. C. (2004). Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(2), 467–482.

  55. Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Hursti, U. K. K., Åberg, L., & Sjödén, P. O. (2003). Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite, 40(2), 109–117.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Mazzocchi, C., Ruggeri, G., & Corsi, S. (2019). Consumers’ preferences for biodiversity in vineyards: A choice experiment on wine. Wine Economics and Policy, 8(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2019.09.002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  57. Meas, T., Hu, W., Batte, M. T., Woods, T. A., & Ernst, S. (2015). Substitutes or complements? Consumer preference for local and organic food attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(4), 1044–1071.

  58. Menozzi, D., Nguyen, T. T., Sogari, G., Taskov, D., Lucas, S., Castro‐Rial, J. L. S., & Mora, C. (2020). Consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for fish products with health and environmental labels: Evidence from five European countries. Nutrients, 12(9), 1–22.

  59. Meyerding, S. G. H., Gentz, M., Altmann, B., & Meier‐Dinkel, L. (2018). Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice‐based conjoint analysis. Appetite, 127(May), 324–333.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. MSC. (2020). Celebrating and supporting sustainable fisheries. The Marine Stewardship Council Annual Report 2019–2020. Marine Stewardship Council. https://www.msc.org/docs/default‐source/default‐document‐library/about‐the‐msc/msc‐annual‐report‐2019‐2020.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Naald, B. V., & Cameron, T. A. (2011). Willingness to pay for other species’ well‐being. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1325–1335.

  62. Noblet, C. L., & Teisl, M. F. (2015). Eco‐labelling as sustainable consumption policy. In L. A. Reisch and J. Thøgersen, Handbook of research on sustainable consumption (pp. 300–312). Edward Publishing.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Ochs, D., Wolf, C. A., Widmar, N. O., Bir, C., & Lai, J. (2019). Hen housing system information effects on U.S. egg demand. Food Policy, 87(May), 101743.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  64. Olsen, S. B., & Meyerhoff, J. (2017). Will the alphabet soup of design criteria affect discrete choice experiment results? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 44(2), 309–336.

  65. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo‐Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Piracci, G., Boncinelli, F., & Casini, L. (2022). Wine consumers’ demand for social sustainability labeling: Evidence for the fair labor claim. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 44(4), 1–20.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Piracci, G., Casini, L., Contini, C., Stancu, C. M., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2023). Identifying key attributes in sustainable food choices: An analysis using the food values framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 416, 137924.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  68. Printezis, I., & Grebitus, C. (2018). Marketing channels for local food. Ecological Economics, 152(May), 161–171.

  69. Printezis, I., Grebitus, C., & Hirsch, S. (2019). The price is right!? A meta‐regression analysis on willingness to pay for local food. PLoS ONE, 14(5), 1–23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Reisch, L. A., Sunstein, C. R., & Kaiser, M. (2021). What do people want to know? Information avoidance and food policy implications. Food Policy, 102, 102076.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Retail Forum for Sustainability. (2011). Labelling. Retrieved May 13, 2022, from Issue Paper n.7 website: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/industry/retail/issue_papers.htm.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  72. Rigby, D., Burton, M., & Pluske, J. (2016). Preference stability and choice consistency in discrete choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 65(2), 441–461.

  73. Rondoni, A., & Grasso, S. (2021). Consumers behaviour towards carbon footprint labels on food: A review of the literature and discussion of industry implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 301, 127031.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  74. Rousseau, S., & Vranken, L. (2013). Green market expansion by reducing information asymmetries: Evidence for labeled organic food products. Food Policy, 40, 31–43.

  75. Santeramo, F. G., & Lamonaca, E. (2019). The effects of non‐tariff measures on agri‐food trade: A review and meta‐analysis of empirical evidence. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(3), 595–617.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Santeramo, F. G., & Lamonaca, E. (2021). Objective risk and subjective risk: The role of information in food supply chains. Food Research International, 139, 109962.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Santeramo, F. G., & Lamonaca, E. (2022). Standards and regulatory cooperation in regional trade agreements: What the effects on trade? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 44(4), 1682–1701.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Santeramo, F. G., Jelliffe, J., & Hoekman, B. (2023). Manuscript Title: International Agri‐food Value Chains: Exploring the role of Trade and Services. RSCAS Working paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  79. Scarpa, R., Thiene, M., & Train, K. (2008). Utility in willingness to pay space: A tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(4), 994–1010.

  80. Schäufele, I., & Hamm, U. (2017). Consumers’ perceptions, preferences and willingness‐to‐pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 379–394.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Schleenbecker, R., & Hamm, U. (2013). Consumers’ perception of organic product characteristics. A review. Appetite, 71, 420–429.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  82. Soley, G., Hu, W., & Vassalos, M. (2019). Willingness to pay for shrimp with homegrown by heroes, community‐supported fishery, best aquaculture practices, or local attributes. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 51(4), 606–621.

  83. Stanley, T. D. (2001). Wheat from chaff: Meta‐analysis as quantitative literature review. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 131–150.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Stanley, T. D., Doucouliagos, H., Giles, M., Heckemeyer, J. H., Johnston, R. J., Laroche, P., Nelson, J., Paldam, M., Poot, J., Pugh, G., Rosenberger, R. S., & Rost, K. (2013). Meta‐analysis of economics research reporting guidelines. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(2), 390–394.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  85. Staples, A. J., Reeling, C. J., Widmar, N. J. O., & Lusk, J. L. (2020). Consumer willingness to pay for sustainability attributes in beer: A choice experiment using eco‐labels. Agribusiness, 36(4), 591–612.

  86. Taylor, L. O., Morrison, M. D., & Boyle, K. J. (2010). Exchange rules and the incentive compatibility of choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 47(2), 197–220.

  87. Tebbe, E., & von Blanckenburg, K. (2018). Does willingness to pay increase with the number and strictness of sustainability labels? Agricultural Economics, 49(1), 41–53.

  88. Teisl, M. F., & Roe, B. (1998). The economics of labeling: An overview of issues for health and environmental disclosure. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 27, 140–150.

  89. Torma, G., & Thøgersen, J. (2021). A systematic literature review on meta sustainability labeling—What do we (not) know? Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126194.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Train, K., & Weeks, M. (2005). Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness‐to‐pay space. In R. Scarpa, & A. Alberini, (Eds.), Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics (pp. 1–16). Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Van Loo, E. J., Caputo, V., Nayga, R. M., & Verbeke, W. (2014). Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy, 49(P1), 137–150.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Van Loo, E. J., Hoefkens, C., & Verbeke, W. (2017). Healthy, sustainable and plant‐based eating: Perceived (mis)match and involvement‐based consumer segments as targets for future policy. Food Policy, 69, 46–57.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  93. Viegas, I., Nunes, L. C., Madureira, L., Fontes, M. A., & Santos, J. L. (2014). Beef credence attributes: Implications of substitution effects on consumers’ WTP. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(3), 600–615.

  94. Willer, H., Trávníček, J., Meier, C., & Schlatter, B. (2021). The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2021. In The World of Organic Agriculture. Retrieved from https://shop.fibl.org/de/artikel/c/statistik/p/1663‐organic‐world‐2015.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  95. Wu, X., Hu, B., & Xiong, J. (2020). Understanding heterogeneous consumer preferences in Chinese milk markets: A latent class approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(1), 184–198.

  96. Xu, P., Su, H., & Lone, T. (2018). Chinese consumers’ willingness to pay for rice. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 8(2), 256–269.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Canadian Consumers’ Perceptions of Sustainability of Food Innovations. (2023). Charlebois, Sylvain ; Smyth, Stuart J ; Lassoued, Rim ; Music, Janet.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6431-:d:1119941.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Retailers’ Audit Strategies for Green Agriculture Based on Dynamic Evolutionary Game. (2023). Liu, Zhenyu ; Yang, Xingyi ; Dai, Xiaopei.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3261-:d:1064465.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Turkish Consumers’ Perceptions of Organic Milk and the Factors Affecting Consumption: The Case of Kocaeli, Türkiye. (2023). Can, Bahar Aydin.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10044-:d:1178811.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Products: A Systematic Literature Review. (2023). Strazzullo, Serena ; Mauriello, Roberto ; Camilleri, Mark Anthony ; Cricelli, Livio.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8923-:d:1161648.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Go Sustainability—Willingness to Pay for Eco–Agricultural Innovation: Understanding Chinese Traditional Cultural Values and Label Trust Using a VAB Hierarchy Model. (2022). Lai, PC ; chung, tinfah ; Wang, Yuyang.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:751-:d:1021602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Preliminary Analysis of Voluntary Information on Organic Milk Labels in Four European Union Countries. (2022). Borghoff, Lisa Marie ; Wo, Karolina ; Paoletti, Flavio ; Rembiakowska, Ewa ; Civitelli, Eleonora Saggia ; Horvat, Andrijana.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16901-:d:1005713.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Disciplinary Categorization of the Cattle Supply Chain—A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. (2022). Ortiz-Araya, Virna ; Linfati, Rodrigo ; Escobar, John Willmer ; Riao, Hernando Barreto.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14275-:d:960221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Consumers’ Purchasing Determinants Towards Mountain Food Products. (2022). Staffolani, Giacomo ; Bentivoglio, Deborah ; Finco, Adele.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8282-:d:857013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Comparison of Consuming Habits on Organic Food—Is It the Same? Hungary Versus China. (2022). Takács-György, Katalin ; Wu, Yue ; Takacs-Gyorgy, Katalin.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7800-:d:848703.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A Cross-Sectional Study on Ethical Buyer Behavior towards Cruelty-Free Cosmetics: What Consequences for Female Leadership Practices?. (2022). Au-Yong, Manuel ; Magano, Jose ; Ferreira, Bruna ; Leite, Angela.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7786-:d:848296.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Preference-Based Determinants of Consumer Choice on the Polish Organic Food Market. (2022). Kocira, Anna ; Dudziak, Agnieszka.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:17:p:10895-:d:903718.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. High price premiums as barriers to organic meat demand? A hedonic analysis considering species, cut and retail outlet. (2022). Staudigel, Matthias ; Trubnikov, Aleksej.
    In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:66:y:2022:i:2:p:309-334.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. When drivers become inhibitors of organic consumption: the need for a multistage view. (2021). Hoffmann, Stefan ; Mai, Robert ; Balderjahn, Ingo.
    In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
    RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:49:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s11747-021-00787-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Swedish consumer market for organic and conventional milk: A demand system analysis. (2021). Lindstrom, Hanna.
    In: Umeå Economic Studies.
    RePEc:hhs:umnees:0998.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Swedish consumer market for organic and conventional milk: A demand system analysis. (2021). Lindstrom, Hanna.
    In: HFI Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:hfiwps:0021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Environmental Issues as Drivers for Food Choice: Study from a Multinational Framework. (2021). Leal, Marcela ; Ferreira, Manuela ; Korzeniowska, Magorzata ; Bizjak, Maa Erneli ; Szcs, Viktoria ; Isoldi, Kathy ; Rumbak, Ivana ; Florena, Sofia G ; Djeki, Ilija ; Bartkiene, Elena ; Correia, Paula ; Klava, Dace ; Orfanos, Panagiotis ; Cardoso, Ana Paula ; Tarcea, Monica.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2869-:d:512050.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Analysis of Product-Country Image from Consumer’s Perspective: The Impact of Subjective Knowledge, Perceived Risk and Media Influence. (2021). Pérez Mesa, Juan ; Sanchez-Fernandez, Raquel ; del Mar, Maria ; Perez-Mesa, Juan Carlos.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2194-:d:501422.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. On the Mechanics of the Organic Label Effect: How Does Organic Labeling Change Consumer Evaluation of Food Products?. (2021). Kun, Andras ; Kiss, Marietta.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1260-:d:486920.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Drivers and Determinants of Food Waste Generation in Restaurants Serving Mediterranean Mezze-Type Cuisine. (2021). Aoun, Pamela ; Abiad, Mohamad G ; Hassan, Hussein F ; Chalak, Ali.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6358-:d:568325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Consumer versus Organic Products in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Opportunities and Barriers to Market Development. (2021). Miglak-Krajewska, Magdalena ; Wojciechowska-Solis, Julia.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5566-:d:629848.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Customer Preferences for Organic Agriculture Produce in the Czech Republic: 2016 and 2019. (2021). Maitah, Mansoor ; Rojik, Stanislav ; Stolin, Radek ; Dziekaski, Pawe ; Prokop, Martin ; Zamkova, Martina ; Chalupova, Martina ; Pila, Ladislav.
    In: Agriculture.
    RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:10:p:968-:d:650431.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Upcycled by-product use in agri-food systems from a consumer perspective: A review of what we know, and what is missing. (2021). Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica ; Do, Isadora.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:168:y:2021:i:c:s0040162521001815.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Barriers and paradoxical recommendation behaviour in online to offline (O2O) services. A convergent mixed-method study. (2021). Scuotto, Veronica ; Talwar, Shalini ; Kaur, Puneet ; Dhir, Amandeep.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:131:y:2021:i:c:p:25-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. What determines consumers use of eco-labels? Taking a close look at label trust. (2021). Tocco, Barbara ; Gorton, Matthew ; Hartmann, Monika ; Yeh, Ching-Hua.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:189:y:2021:i:c:s0921800921002317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Warum wir eine Tierschutzsteuer brauchen: Die Bürger-Konsumenten-Lücke. (2020). Spiller, Achim ; Busch, Gesa.
    In: DARE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:daredp:2001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Organic aquaculture productivity, environmental sustainability, and food security: insights from organic agriculture. (2020). Thompson, Shirley ; Ahmed, Nesar ; Turchini, Giovanni M.
    In: Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food.
    RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:12:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s12571-020-01090-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Sustainability in the Beverage Industry: A Research Agenda from the Demand Side. (2020). Sellers-Rubio, Ricardo ; Rodriguez-Sanchez, Carla.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:186-:d:469142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. German Consumers’ Perceptions of Organic Wine—A Qualitative Approach. (2020). Hauck, Katharina ; Szolnoki, Gergely.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7729-:d:415584.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Characteristics and Motivations of Consumers of Direct Purchasing Channels and the Perceived Barriers to Alternative Food Purchase: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Ecuadorian Andes. (2020). Latorre, Sara ; Paredes, Myriam ; Hurtado, Maria Fernanda ; Batal, Malek ; April-Lalonde, Gabriel ; Muoz, Fabian ; Cole, Donald C ; Deaconu, Ana.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6923-:d:404114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Consumer Willingness To Pay for Proenvironmental Attributes of Biogas Digestate-Based Potting Soil. (2020). Kurz, Peter ; Dahlin, Johannes ; Herbes, Carsten.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6405-:d:396589.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Encouraging and Enabling Lifestyles and Behaviours to Simultaneously Promote Environmental Sustainability, Health and Equity: Key Policy Messages from INHERIT. (2020). Zverinova, Iva ; Ščasný, Milan ; Lillefjell, Monica ; Romeo-Velilla, Maria ; Anthun, Kirsti ; Zvinova, Iva ; Stegeman, Ingrid ; Kruize, Hanneke ; Maca, Vojtch ; Morris, George ; Taylor, Timothy ; Costongs, Caroline ; Bell, Ruth ; Staatsen, Brigit ; Strube, Rosa ; Godfrey, Alba ; van der Vliet, Nina.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7166-:d:421962.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Exploring Influential Factors Including COVID-19 on Green Food Purchase Intentions and the Intention–Behaviour Gap: A Qualitative Study among Consumers in a Chinese Context. (2020). Qi, Xin ; Yu, Huaming ; Ploeger, Angelika.
    In: IJERPH.
    RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7106-:d:420832.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Development of Functional High-Protein Organic Bars with the Addition of Whey Protein Concentrate and Bioactive Ingredients. (2020). Trzskowska, Monika ; Neffe-Skociska, Katarzyna ; Zieliska, Dorota ; Kooyn-Krajewska, Danuta ; Epecka, Anna ; Szydowska, Aleksandra.
    In: Agriculture.
    RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:9:p:390-:d:408539.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Understanding the drivers of organic foods purchasing of millennials: Evidence from Brazil and Spain. (2020). Molinillo, Sebastian ; Vidal-Branco, Murilo ; Japutra, Arnold.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:52:y:2020:i:c:s0969698919301158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The impacts of perceived moral obligation and sustainability self‐identity on sustainability development: A theory of planned behavior purchase intention model of sustainability‐labeled coffee and the moderating effect of climate change skepticism. (2020). Chen, Meifang.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:29:y:2020:i:6:p:2404-2417.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Consumer Buying Behavior of Organic Food with Respect to Health and Safety Concerns among Adolescents. (2019). Raza, Syed ; Nisar, Wasay ; Shah, Nida.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:93570.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. The Effects of Macroeconomic Indicators on Leveraged Forex Volume: Evidence from Turkey. (2019). Tarabolu, Tuncay Turan ; Topalolu, Tuba Nur ; Yaman, Serdar.
    In: Istanbul Business Research.
    RePEc:ist:ibsibr:v:48:y:2019:i:2:p:160-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The main aim of this study is determining which consumption motives and personal and social factors affect organic food buying decisions. Ajzen’s Planned Behavior Theory (TPB) is used to explain consumers’ organic food selection behaviors. In addition, the moderating role of uncertainty about organic foods and the mediating role of the price of organic foods were tested. Data were gathered via a survey of consumers of organic foods in Turkey. The research model was tested by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) via Smart PLS3. The findings showed that consumptions motives of healthiness, easiness, mood, and convenience-price of organic foods motivate consumers to buy organic foods. In addition, environmental concern and negative emotions influence on attitudes towards organic foods and purchase intentions. On the other hand, subjective norms and self-monitoring do not influence attitudes towards organic foods and subsequent purchase intentions. Uncertainty has a moderating effect on the relationship between attitudes and purchase intentions whereas price has no mediating effect on the relationship between attitudes and purchase intentions.. (2019). Yildiz, Tuba ; Unal, Sevtap ; Devec, Gorgun F.
    In: Istanbul Business Research.
    RePEc:ist:ibsibr:v:48:y:2019:i:1:p:1-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. ORGANIC FOOD: IDENTIFYING ACTIONABLE SEGMENTS. (2019). Baglione, Stephen L ; Tucci, Louis A ; Stanton, John L.
    In: Holistic Marketing Management Journal.
    RePEc:hmm:journl:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:10-27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Impact of Food Sustainability Labels on the Perceived Product Value and Price Expectations of Urban Consumers. (2019). Rejman, Krystyna ; Kaczorowska, Joanna ; Gorska-Warsewicz, Hanna ; Halicka, Ewa ; Szczebyo, Agata.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7240-:d:298814.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Consumers Demand for Social Farming Products: An Analysis with Discrete Choice Experiments. (2019). Vecchiato, Daniel ; Tempesta, Tiziano ; Bugatti, Maria ; Nassivera, Federico ; Torquati, Biancamaria.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6742-:d:291683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Consumer Attitude, Concerns, and Brand Acceptance for the Vegetables Cultivated with Sustainable Plant Factory Production Systems. (2019). Huang, Li-Chun.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4862-:d:264591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. The Millennials’ Concept of Sustainability in the Food Sector. (2019). Bollani, Luigi ; Peira, Giovanni ; Bonadonna, Alessandro.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2984-:d:234278.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. The myth of retail pricing policy for developing organic vegetable markets. (2019). Wu, Xiang ; Xiong, Jie ; Li, Haitao.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:51:y:2019:i:c:p:8-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. What drives consumers to certain retailers for organic food purchase: The role of fit for consumers€™ retail store preference. (2019). Hwang, Jiyoung ; Chung, Jae-Eun.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:47:y:2019:i:c:p:293-306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Choosing Organic and Healthy Food in Times of Economic Uncertainty: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis in France. (2019). Joseph, Kaswengi ; Houcine, Akrout.
    In: Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:13:n:2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Green DIY store choice among socially responsible consumer generations. (2018). Dabija, Dan Cristian ; Bejan, Brandusa Mariana.
    In: International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility.
    RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:3:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-018-0037-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. The Influence of “Euro-Leaf” Logo on Consumers’ Choices: The Italian Case of Branded and Private Label Food Products. (2018). Schena, Rosamartina ; Morrone, Domenico.
    In: International Journal of Business and Management.
    RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Tasty or Sustainable? The Effect of Product Sensory Experience on a Sustainable New Food Product: An Application of Discrete Choice Experiments on Chianina Tinned Beef. (2018). Vecchiato, Daniel ; Tempesta, Tiziano ; Venanzi, Sonia ; Torquati, Biancamaria.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2795-:d:162374.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. What determines consumers’ trust in the EU’s organic label? A cross country comparison of the role of institutional trust and consumer knowledge. (2018). Tocco, Barbara ; Gorton, Matthew ; Hartmann, Monika ; Yeh, Ching-Hua.
    In: 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea18:273857.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-09-28 21:06:41 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated August, 3 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.