1. The role of multiple board directorships in sustainability strategies: symbol or substance?. (2025). Reguera-Alvarado, Nuria ; Bravo-Urquiza, Francisco.
   In: Review of Managerial Science.
   RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:19:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11846-024-00778-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Examining CEO Characteristics and Carbon Emissions: A Quantile Approach to UK-Listed Firms. (2025). Elbayuomi, Ahmed F ; Kandil, Nariman ; Bouaddi, Mohammed ; Elmoursy, Hanan.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5732-:d:1684615.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Pyramidal structure, vertical interlock, and corporate innovation. (2025). , Lewis ; Tian, Shaohua.
   In: Global Finance Journal.
   RePEc:eee:glofin:v:64:y:2025:i:c:s1044028324001376.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. The Effect of Women’s Leadership on Carbon Disclosure by the Top 100 Global Energy Leaders. (2023). Majid, Nurshahirah Abd ; Jaaffar, Amar Hisham.
   In: Sustainability.
   RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8491-:d:1154012.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Do CEOs’ social networks affect carbon emissions in China? The moderating role of CEO reputation. (2023). Lin, Zhongguo ; Du, Huibin ; Peng, Binbin.
   In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
   RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:1122-1137.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Does cost of debt reflect the value of quality greenhouse gas emissions reduction efforts and disclosure?. (2023). Lu, Jing ; Nazari, Jamal A ; Herremans, Irene M ; Mahmoudian, Fereshteh ; Yu, Dongning.
   In: Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation.
   RePEc:eee:jiaata:v:52:y:2023:i:c:s1061951823000423.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Corporate social responsibility misconduct and formation of board interlocks. (2023). Wang, Yujie ; Xiang, YI ; Yao, Daifei ; Tsang, Albert.
   In: Journal of Financial Stability.
   RePEc:eee:finsta:v:67:y:2023:i:c:s1572308923000621.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Are firms with better sustainability performance more resilient during crises?. (2022). Foti, Lianne ; Rodenburg, Kathleen ; Lu, Jing ; Pegoraro, Ann.
   In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
   RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:7:p:3354-3370.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The influence of governance structure on the relationship between pay ratio and environmental and social performance. (2022). Jermias, Johnny ; Mahmoudian, Fereshteh.
   In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
   RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:7:p:2992-3013.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. How Does Family Involvement Affect Environmental Innovation? A Socioemotional Wealth Perspective. (2021). Kim, Sang-Joon ; Lee, Juil ; Han, Joohee.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13114-:d:688887.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Board interlocks, absorptive capacity, and environmental performance. (2021). Lu, Jing ; Nazari, Jamal A ; Herremans, Irene M ; Mahmoudian, Fereshteh ; Yu, Dongning.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:8:p:3425-3443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Aureli, S., Del Baldo, M., Lombardi, R., & Nappo, F. (2020). Nonfinancial reporting regulation and challenges in sustainability disclosure and corporate governance practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, in Press., 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2509.

2. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159562.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556363.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

4. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2.

5. Beckman, C. M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2002). Network learning: The effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 92–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094892.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

6. Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. J. (2004). Friends or strangers? Firm‐specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science, 15(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0065.

7. Bowen, F. E. (2000). Environmental visibility: a trigger of green organizational response? Business Strategy and the Environment, 9(2), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0836(200003/04)9:2<92::aid-bse230>3.0.co;2-x.

8. Boyd, B. (1990). Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110602.

9. Burt, R. S. (1983). Corporate profits and cooptation: Networks of market constraints and directorate ties in the American economy. New York: Academic Press.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

10. Cadez, S., Czerny, A., & Letmathe, P. (2019). Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2070.

11. Certo, S. T., Busenbark, J. R., Woo, H.‐S., & Semadeni, M. (2016). Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2639–2657. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2475.

12. Chiu, P.‐C., Teoh, S. H., & Tian, F. (2012). Board interlocks and earnings management contagion. The Accounting Review, 88(3), 915–944. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50369.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

13. Cordeiro, J. J., Profumo, G., & Tutore, I. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1127–1144. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2421.

14. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta‐analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<269::AID-SMJ950>3.0.CO;2-K.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393275.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. de Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311411506.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Endo, K. (2020). Corporate governance beyond the shareholder–stakeholder dichotomy: Lessons from Japanese corporations' environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), 1625–1633. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2457.

18. Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00037-1.

19. Galbreath, J. (2010). Corporate governance practices that address climate change: An exploratory study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.648.

20. García‐Sánchez, I.‐M., Gallego‐Álvarez, I., & Zafra‐Gómez, J.‐L. (2020). Do the ecoinnovation and ecodesign strategies generate value added in munificent environments? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1021–1033. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2414.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

21. Glass, C., Cook, A., & Ingersoll, A. R. (2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1879.

22. Golden, B. R., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). When will boards influence strategy? inclination × power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1087–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.202.

23. Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z.

24. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural‐resource‐based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. Heide, J. B. (1994). Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252252.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Herremans, I. M., Herschovis, M. S., & Bertels, S. (2009). Leaders and laggards: The influence of competing logics on corporate environmental action. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-008-0010-Z.

27. Hillman, A. J. (2015). Board diversity: Beginning to unpeel the onion. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 104–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12090.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
28. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

29. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179.

30. Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Luce, R. A. (2001). Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference? Business & Society, 40(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000304.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

31. Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5.

32. Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12154.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Jordaan, S. M., Romo‐Rabago, E., McLeary, R., Reidy, L., Nazari, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2017). The role of energy technology innovation in reducing greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of Canada. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 1397–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.162.

34. Kim, D., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? American Economic Review, 106(5), 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161032.

35. Lenox, M., & King, A. (2004). Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.379.

36. Li, J., Zhao, F., Chen, S., Jiang, W., Liu, T., & Shi, S. (2017). Gender diversity on boards and firms' environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1918.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

37. Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1449–1464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2326.

38. Maaloul, A. (2018). The effect of greenhouse gas emissions on cost of debt: Evidence from Canadian firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1407–1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1662.

39. Mahmoudian, F., Lu, J., Yu, D., Nazari, J. A., & Herremans, I. M. (2020). Inter‐ and intra‐organizational stakeholder arrangements in carbon management accounting. The British Accounting Review, 1–19, 100933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100933.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
40. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
41. Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

42. Moussa, T., Allam, A., Elbanna, S., & Bani‐Mustafa, A. (2020). Can board environmental orientation improve U.S. firms' carbon performance? The mediating role of carbon strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2351.

43. Niesten, E., Jolink, A., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Chappin, M., & Lozano, R. (2017). Sustainable collaboration: The impact of governance and institutions on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.085.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

44. Orazalin, N. (2020). Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2354.

45. Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., & Aragon‐Correa, J. A. (2015). Boards and sustainability: The contingent influence of director interlocks on corporate environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 499–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1833.

46. Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., Aragón‐Correa, J. A., Delgado‐Ceballos, J., & Ferrón‐Vílchez, V. (2012). The effect of director interlocks on firms' adoption of proactive environmental strategies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00893.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
47. Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393956.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
48. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organization: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
49. Provan, K. G., Beyer, J. M., & Kruytbosch, C. (1980). Environmental linkages and power in resource‐dependence relations between organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 200–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392452.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
50. Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., Gallego‐Álvarez, I., & Bel‐Oms, I. (2019). Board structures, liberal countries, and developed market economies. Do they matter in environmental reporting? An International Outlook. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 710–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2275.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

51. Qureshi, M. A., Kirkerud, S., Theresa, K., & Ahsan, T. (2020). The impact of sustainability (environmental, social, and governance) disclosure and board diversity on firm value: The moderating role of industry sensitivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1199–1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2427.

52. Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A., & Rubino, M. (2020). The role of ownership structure in integrated reporting policies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2498.

53. Rajesh, R., & Rajendran, C. (2020). Relating environmental, social, and governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1247–1267. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2429.

54. Ravasi, D., & Zattoni, A. (2006). Exploring the political side of board involvement in strategy: A study of mixed‐ownership institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1671–1702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00659.x.

55. Ren, S., He, D., Zhang, T., & Chen, X. (2019). Symbolic reactions or substantive pro‐environmental behaviour? An empirical study of corporate environmental performance under the government's environmental subsidy scheme. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1148–1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2308.

56. Richardson, R. J. (1987). Directorship interlocks and corporate profitability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392910.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
57. Rupley, K. H., Brown, D., & Marshall, R. S. (2012). Governance, media and the quality of environmental disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(6), 610–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.09.002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

58. Shahab, Y., Ntim, C. G., Chen, Y., Ullah, F., Li, H.‐X., & Ye, Z. (2020). Chief executive officer attributes, sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting: New insights from upper echelons perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2345.

59. Shropshire, C. (2010). The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.2.zok246.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

60. Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom:: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.10.002.

61. Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.265.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

62. Sun, W., Li, X., Geng, Y., Yang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Board interlocks and the diffusion of CSR reporting practices: The role of market development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1333–1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1887.

63. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

64. Tingbani, I., Chithambo, L., Tauringana, V., & Papanikolaou, N. (2020). Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment, in Press., 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2495.

65. Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Morner, M. (2015). Board of directors' diversity, creativity, and cognitive conflict. International Studies of Management and Organization, 45(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2015.1005992.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

66. Wijethilake, C., & Upadhaya, B. (2020). Market drivers of sustainability and sustainability learning capabilities: The moderating role of sustainability control systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, in Press., 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2503.

67. Xue, B., Zhang, Z., & Li, P. (2020). Corporate environmental performance, environmental management and firm risk. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1074–1096. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2418.

68. Zona, F., Gomez‐Mejia, L. R., & Withers, M. C. (2018). Board interlocks and firm performance: Toward a combined agency–resource dependence perspective. Journal of Management, 44(2), 589–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315579512.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

69. Zou, H., Xie, X., Meng, X., & Yang, M. (2019). The diffusion of corporate social responsibility through social network ties: From the perspective of strategic imitation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1670.

70. Zou, H., Xie, X., Qi, G., & Yang, M. (2019). The heterogeneous relationship between board social ties and corporate environmental responsibility in an emerging economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2180.

1. Exploring the drivers of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure in an emerging market context using a mixed methods approach. (2025). Adardour, Zahra ; Ed-Dafali, Slimane ; Mohiuddin, Muhammad ; el Mortagi, Omar ; Sbai, Hicham ; Bouzahir, Brahim.
   In: Future Business Journal.
   RePEc:spr:futbus:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s43093-025-00530-w.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Environmental, social, and governance reporting adoption factors for sustainable development at the country level. (2025). Shri, Charu ; Saini, Neha.
   In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
   RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04537-1.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Organizational and Economic Barriers to the Development of Sustainable Finance (on the Example of Large Industrial Businesses in the Ural Region). (2025). Buchinskaia, Olga N ; Wegner-Kozlova, Ekaterina O ; Lavrikova, Yuliya G.
   In: Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal.
   RePEc:fru:finjrn:250107:p:108-125.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Assessing the Level of Sustainability Planning: Insights from the Automotive Sector. (2025). Cicchini, Daniela ; Cotana, Maria Luisa.
   In: MANAGEMENT CONTROL.
   RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2025-001009.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Reprint of: Does mandating corporate social and environmental disclosure improve social and environmental performance?: Broad-based evidence regarding the effectiveness of directive 2014/95/EU. (2025). Farneti, Federica ; Li, Zhongtian ; Jia, Jing ; Dumay, John ; de Villiers, Charl.
   In: The British Accounting Review.
   RePEc:eee:bracre:v:57:y:2025:i:1:s0890838925000083.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Unlocking sustainability potential: The impact of green finance reform on corporate ESG performance. (2024). Wan, Jing ; Zhou, Xiaotian ; Gao, DA.
   In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
   RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:4211-4226.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. The Impact of Sustainability Performance on Company Profitability in the COVID-19 Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Context. (2024). Aurelia, Tefnescu ; Alexandra, Tefan.
   In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence.
   RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:2183-2195:n:1031.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Effects of Family Ownership and Professionalization on Firms€™ Financial Performance and Sustainability Reputation. (2024). Thananusak, Trin ; Piyasinchai, Nareuporn ; Hughes, Mat.
   In: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
   RePEc:sae:entthe:v:48:y:2024:i:3:p:856-880.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. The link between CSR performance and CSR disclosure quality: does board diversity matter?. (2024). Magnan, Michel ; Gutierrez, Luania ; Cormier, Denis.
   In: Journal of Management & Governance.
   RePEc:kap:jmgtgv:v:28:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10997-022-09661-6.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Do sustainable supply chain practices mitigate carbon emissions? The role of supplier environmental, social and governance training. (2024). Daoud, Nejla Ould ; Karaman, Abdullah S ; Uyar, Ali.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:8:p:8126-8148.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. SOEs commitment to transparency: Voluntary disclosure as a driver of mandatory disclosure. (2024). Aguilar, Nieves Gomez ; Conesa, Maria C ; Jorge, Manuel Larran ; Lopez, Estibaliz Biedma.
    In: Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics.
    RePEc:bla:annpce:v:95:y:2024:i:3:p:883-917.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Towards sustainable development: The role of directors international orientation and their diversity for non‐financial disclosure. (2023). Kozowski, Ukasz ; Godawska, Justyna ; Krasodomska, Joanna ; Dobija, Dorota ; Arena, Claudia.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:1:p:66-90.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Nature of corporate environmentalism in large-listed Indian firms: empirical evidence from Indian companies. (2023). Kumar, Surender ; Dua, Pritika.
    In: Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.
    RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:13:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s13412-023-00851-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. Understanding Corporate Sustainability Disclosures from the Securities Exchange Commission Filings. (2023). Raghupathi, Wullianallur ; Wu, Sarah Jinhui.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4134-:d:1079526.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. Regulations on Non-Financial Disclosure in Corporate Reporting: A Thematic Review. (2023). Mustafa, Nurul Jannah ; Ali, Hasani Mohd.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2793-:d:1056956.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Corporate ESG performance and trade credit financing – Evidence from China. (2023). He, Feng ; Wei, Dianlong ; Luo, Chunhua.
    In: International Review of Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:eee:reveco:v:85:y:2023:i:c:p:337-351.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Sustainability performance indicator trends: a Canadian industry-based analysis. (2022). Gagne, Vincent ; Berthelot, Sylvie ; Coulmont, Michel.
    In: International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility.
    RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:7:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-022-00070-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Changes in the climate-related disclosure of German listed companies during the first years of the new reporting standard. (2022). Leicht, Maximilian.
    In: Future Business Journal.
    RePEc:spr:futbus:v:8:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s43093-022-00118-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Barriers to Using ESG Data for Investment Decisions. (2022). Sigurjonsson, Throstur Olaf ; Wendt, Stefan ; Johannsdottir, Lara ; Jonsdottir, Bjorg.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5157-:d:801493.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Environmental, Social, and Governance Integration into the Business Model: Literature Review and Research Agenda. (2022). Almazyad, Othman ; Kokuryo, Jiro ; Goi, Hoe Chin ; Aldowaish, Alaa.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2959-:d:763244.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Rise and Fall of the Materiality Matrix: Lessons from a Missed Takeoff. (2022). de Cristofaro, Tiziana ; Raucci, Domenico.
    In: Administrative Sciences.
    RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:186-:d:995316.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice?. (2022). Arvidsson, Susanne ; Dumay, John.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:3:p:1091-1110.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. A review and synthesis of contemporary sustainability accounting research and the development of a research agenda. (2022). Hsiao, Peichi Kelly ; Oosthuizen, Hein ; Horner, Claire ; de Villiers, Charl.
    In: Accounting and Finance.
    RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:62:y:2022:i:4:p:4453-4483.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Carrot or stick? An empirical analysis of the different implementation strategies of the EU directive on nonfinancial information across Europe. (2021). Panfilo, Silvia ; Fasan, Marco ; Mio, Chiara ; Marcon, Carlo.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:6:p:1591-1605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. Environmental key performance indicators: the role of regulations and stakeholder influence. (2021). Krasodomska, Joanna ; Zarzycka, Ewelina.
    In: Environment Systems and Decisions.
    RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:41:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10669-021-09825-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. The Dimension of Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Broadness of Information in Italian Companies. (2021). Nisio, Antonio ; Milone, Virginia ; Spallini, Sabrina ; Romanazzi, Patrizia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1457-:d:490043.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Reporting di Sostenibilit? e Controllo Manageriale: L?esperienza di Edison S.p.A.. (2021). Molinari, Matteo ; Maraghini, Maria Pia ; Riccaboni, Angelo.
    In: MANAGEMENT CONTROL.
    RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2021-002004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Non‐financial strategy disclosure and environmental, social and governance score: Insight from a configurational approach. (2021). Santamaria, Riccardo ; Cucari, Nicola ; Dezi, Luca ; Paolone, Francesco.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:1993-2007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Toward sustainable corporate behavior: The effect of the critical mass of female directors on environmental, social, and governance disclosure. (2021). de Masi, Sara ; Becagli, Claudio ; Paci, Andrea ; Somkagobiowska, Agnieszka.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:4:p:1865-1878.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. Board interlocks and greenhouse gas emissions. (2021). Lu, Jing ; Nazari, Jamal A ; Herremans, Irene M ; Mahmoudian, Fereshteh ; Yu, Dongning.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:92-108.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosure on the cost of capital in small and medium enterprises: The role of family business status. (2021). Sciascia, Salvatore ; Gjergji, Rafaela ; Vena, Luigi ; Cortesi, Alessandro.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:683-693.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Does the EU Directive on non‐financial information influence the value relevance of ESG disclosure? Italian evidence. (2020). Cordazzo, Michela ; Bini, Laura ; Marzo, Giuseppe.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:29:y:2020:i:8:p:3470-3483.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-10-02 00:54:37 || Missing content? Let us know