- Allen, K.E. & Colson, G. (2019) Understanding PES from the ground up: A combined choice experiment and interview approach to understanding PES in Costa Rica. Sustainability Science, 14, 391–404.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Alló, M., Loureiro, M.L. & Iglesias, E. (2015) Farmers' preferences and social capital regarding agri‐environmental schemes to protect birds. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3), 672–689. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477‐9552.12104.
Aslam, U., Termansen, M. & Fleskens, L. (2017) Investigating farmers' preferences for alternative PES schemes for carbon sequestration in UK agroecosystems. Ecosystem Services, 27, 103–112.
- Ayambire, R.A. & Pittman, J. (2021) Adaptive comanagement of environmental risks in result‐based agreements for the provision of environmental services: A case study of the south of the divide conservation action program. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113111.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Balana, B.B., Yatich, T. & Mäkelä, M. (2011) A conjoint analysis of landholder preferences for reward‐based land‐management contracts in Kapingazi watershed, eastern Mount Kenya. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(10), 2634–2646.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Banerjee, P., Pal, R., Wossink, A. & Asher, J. (2021) Heterogeneity in farmers' social preferences and the design of green payment schemes. Environmental and Resource Economics, 78, 201–226.
- Barghusen, R., Sattler, C., Berner, R. & Matzdorf, B. (2022) More than spatial coordination–how Dutch agricultural collectives foster social capital for effective governance of Agri‐environmental measures. Journal of Rural Studies, 96, 246–258.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bartkowski, B., Droste, N., Ließ, M., Sidemo‐Holm, W., Weller, U. & Brady, M.V. (2021) Payments by modelled results: A novel design for agri‐environmental schemes. Land Use Policy, 102, 105230.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bartolini, F., Gallerani, V., Raggi, M. & Viaggi, D. (2012) Modelling the linkages between cross‐compliance and agri‐environmental schemes under asymmetric information. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(2), 310–330.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Bastian, C.T., Keske, C.M.H., McLeod, D.M. & Hoag, D.L. (2017) Landowner and land trust agent preferences for conservation easements: Implications for sustainable land uses and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 1–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.030.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Beharry‐Borg, N., Smart, J.C., Termansen, M. & Hubacek, K. (2013) Evaluating farmers' likely participation in a payment programme for water quality protection in the UK uplands. Regional Environmental Change, 13, 633–647.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bennett, M.T., Gong, Y. & Scarpa, R. (2018) Hungry birds and angry farmers: Using choice experiments to assess “eco‐compensation” for coastal wetlands protection in China. Ecological Economics, 154, 71–87.
Bhatta, M., Garnett, S.T. & Zander, K.K. (2022) Exploring options for a PES‐like scheme to conserve red panda habitat and livelihood improvement in western Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 53, 101388. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101388.
Blazy, J.M., Carpentier, A. & Thomas, A. (2011) The willingness to adopt agro‐ecological innovations: Application of choice modelling to Caribbean banana planters. Ecological Economics, 72, 140–150.
Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M. & Gurgand, M. (2007) Selection bias corrections based on the multinomial logit model: Monte Carlo comparisons. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(1), 174–205. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐6419.2007.00503.x.
- Breustedt, G., Schulz, N. & Latacz‐Lohmann, U. (2013) Factors affecting participation and compensation requirements in agri‐environmental schemes: Insights from a discrete choice experiment. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(4), 244–258.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Broch, S.W. & Vedel, S.E. (2012) Using choice experiments to investigate the policy relevance of heterogeneity in farmer agri‐environmental contract preferences. Environmental and Resource Economics, 51, 561–581.
Broch, S.W., Strange, N., Jacobsen, J.B. & Wilson, K.A. (2013) Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution. Ecological Economics, 92, 78–86.
- Burke, P.J. & Stets, J.E. (2009) Identity theory. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Burton, R.J., Forney, J., Stock, P. & Sutherland, L.A. (2020) The good farmer: culture and identity in food and agriculture. London: Routledge.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Burton, R.J.F. & Schwarz, G. (2013) Result‐oriented agri‐environmental schemes in Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 628–641. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.002.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Canessa, C., Venus, T.E., Wiesmeier, M., Mennig, P. & Sauer, J. (2023) Incentives, rewards or both in payments for ecosystem services: Drawing a link between farmers' preferences and biodiversity levels. Ecological Economics, 213, 107954.
Carson, R.T. & Groves, T. (2007) Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(1), 181–210. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640‐007‐9124‐5.
- Chang, S., Wuepper, D., Heissenhuber, A. & Sauer, J. (2017) Investigating rice farmers' preferences for an agri‐environmental scheme: Is an eco‐label a substitute for payments? Land Use Policy, 64, 374–382.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Chen, X., Lupi, F., He, G. & Liu, J. (2009) Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(28), 11812–11817.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Chèze, B., David, M. & Martinet, V. (2020) Understanding farmers' reluctance to reduce pesticide use: A choice experiment. Ecological Economics, 167, 106349.
Christensen, T., Pedersen, A.B., Nielsen, H.O., Mørkbak, M.R., Hasler, B. & Denver, S. (2011) Determinants of farmers' willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide‐free buffer zones—a choice experiment study. Ecological Economics, 70(8), 1558–1564.
Colen, L., Gomez y Paloma, S., Latacz‐Lohmann, U., Lefebvre, M., Préget, R. & Thoyer, S. (2016) Economic experiments as a tool for agricultural policy evaluation: Insights from the European CAP. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d'agroeconomie, 64(4), 667–694.
- Colombo, S., Budziński, W., Czajkowski, M. & Glenk, K. (2022) The relative performance of ex‐ante and ex‐post measures to mitigate hypothetical and strategic bias in a stated preference study. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(3), 845–873. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477‐9552.12484.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Cortés‐Capano, G., Hanley, N., Sheremet, O., Hausmann, A., Toivonen, T., Garibotto‐Carton, G. et al. (2021) Assessing landowners’ preferences to inform voluntary private land conservation: the role of non‐monetary incentives. Land Use Policy, 109, 105626. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105626.
- Costedoat, S., Koetse, M., Corbera, E. & Ezzine‐de‐Blas, D. (2016) Cash only? Unveiling preferences for a PES contract through a choice experiment in Chiapas, Mexico. Land Use Policy, 58, 302–317.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Cranford, M. & Mourato, S. (2014) Credit‐based payments for ecosystem services: Evidence from a choice experiment in Ecuador. World Development, 64, 503–520.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Czajkowski, M., Zagórska, K., Letki, N., Tryjanowski, P. & Wąs, A. (2021) Drivers of farmers' willingness to adopt extensive farming practices in a globally important bird area. Land Use Policy, 107, 104223.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Danne, M. & Musshoff, O. (2017) Analysis of farmers' willingness to participate in pasture grazing programs: Results from a discrete choice experiment with German dairy farmers. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(9), 7569–7580.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Danne, M., Mußhoff, O. & Schulte, M. (2019) Analysing the importance of glyphosate as part of agricultural strategies: A discrete choice experiment. Land Use Policy, 86, 189–207.
Dessart, F.J., Barreiro‐Hurlé, J. & van Bavel, R. (2019) Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy‐oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 417–471.
- Ducos, G., Dupraz, P. & Bonnieux, F. (2009) Agri‐environment contract adoption under fixed and variable compliance costs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(5), 669–687.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- El Benni, N., Grovermann, C. & Finger, R. (2023) Towards more evidence‐based agricultural and food policies. Q Open, 3(3), qoad003. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoad003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Engel, S. (2016) The devil in the detail: A practical guide on designing payments for environmental services. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(1–2), 131–177.
Espinosa‐Goded, M., Barreiro‐Hurlé, J. & Ruto, E. (2010) What do farmers want from Agri‐environmental scheme design? A choice experiment approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2), 259–273.
- European Commission. (2020a) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‐ A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally‐Friendly Food System, Document 52020DC0381.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission. (2020b) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions ‐ EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 Bringing nature back into our lives, Document 52020DC0380.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ferraro, P.J. (2008) Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 810–821.
- Ferro‐Vázquez, C., Lang, C., Kaal, J. & Stump, D. (2017) When is a terrace not a terrace? The importance of understanding landscape evolution in studies of terraced agriculture. Journal of Environmental Management, 202, 500–513.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Franks, J.R. & McGloin, A. (2007) Joint submissions, output related payments and environmental co‐operatives: Can the Dutch experience innovate UK agri‐environment policy? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(2), 233–256.
Franzén, F., Dinnétz, P. & Hammer, M. (2016) Factors affecting farmers' willingness to participate in eutrophication mitigation—a case study of preferences for wetland creation in Sweden. Ecological Economics, 130, 8–15.
- Friedman, R.S., Law, E.A., Bennett, N.J., Ives, C.D., Thorn, J.P. & Wilson, K.A. (2018) How just and just how? A systematic review of social equity in conservation research. Environmental Research Letters, 13(5), 053001.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Geussens, K., Van den Broeck, G., Vanderhaegen, K., Verbist, B. & Maertens, M. (2019) Farmers' perspectives on payments for ecosystem services in Uganda. Land Use Policy, 84, 316–327.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Giefer, M.M., An, L. & Chen, X. (2021) Normative, livelihood, and demographic influences on enrollment in a payment for ecosystem services program. Land Use Policy, 108, 105525. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105525.
Gramig, B.M. & Widmar, N.J. (2018) Farmer preferences for agricultural soil carbon sequestration schemes. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(3), 502–521.
Greene, W.H. & Hensher, D.A. (2003) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(8), 681–698.
Greiner, R. (2016) Factors influencing farmers' participation in contractual biodiversity conservation: A choice experiment with northern Australian pastoralists. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 60(1), 1–21.
- Grove, A.T. & Sutton, J.E. (1989) Agricultural terracing south of the Sahara. Azania: Journal of the British Institute in Eastern Africa, 24(1), 113–122.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Haddaway, N.R., Macura, B., Whaley, P. & Pullin, A.S. (2018) ROSES RepOrting Standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: Pro forma, flow‐diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, 7, 1–8.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Häfner, K. & Piorr, A. (2021) Farmers' perception of co‐ordinating institutions in agri‐environmental measures–the example of peatland management for the provision of public goods on a landscape scale. Land Use Policy, 107, 104947.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Haile, K.K., Tirivayi, N. & Tesfaye, W. (2019) Farmers' willingness to accept payments for ecosystem services on agricultural land: The case of climate‐smart agroforestry in Ethiopia. Ecosystem Services, 39, 100964.
Hanley, N. & Czajkowski, M. (2019) The role of stated preference valuation methods in understanding choices and informing policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13, 248–266.
Hanley, N. & Perrings, C. (2019) The economic value of biodiversity. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 11, 355–375.
Hansen, K., Duke, E., Bond, C., Purcell, M. & Paige, G. (2018) Rancher preferences for a payment for ecosystem services program in Southwestern Wyoming. Ecological Economics, 146, 240–249. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.013.
- Hasler, B., Czajkowski, M., Elofsson, K., Hansen, L.B., Konrad, M.T., Nielsen, H.Ø. et al. (2019) Farmers' preferences for nutrient and climate‐related agri‐environmental schemes: A cross‐country comparison. Ambio, 48, 1290–1303.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Herring, M.W., Garnett, S.T. & Zander, K.K. (2022) Producing rice while conserving the habitat of an endangered waterbird: Incentives for farmers to integrate water management. Land Use Policy, 120, 106269.
Hope, R., Borgoyary, M. & Agarwal, C. (2008) Smallholder preferences for agri‐environmental change at the Bhoj wetland, India. Development Policy Review, 26(5), 585–602.
Houessionon, P., Fonta, W.M., Bossa, A.Y., Sanfo, S., Thiombiano, N., Zahonogo, P. et al. (2017) Economic valuation of ecosystem services from small‐scale agricultural management interventions in Burkina Faso: A discrete choice experiment approach. Sustainability, 9(9), 1672.
Ingram, J.C., Wilkie, D., Clements, T., McNab, R.B., Nelson, F., Baur, E.H. et al. (2014) Evidence of payments for ecosystem services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods. Ecosystem Services, 7, 10–21.
- Jaeck, M. & Lifran, R. (2013) Farmers' preferences for production practices: a choice experiment study in the Rhone River Delta. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(1), 112–130. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477‐9552.12018.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jones, K.W., Powlen, K., Roberts, R. & Shinbrot, X. (2020) Participation in payments for ecosystem services programs in the global south: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101159.
- Jose, S. & Dollinger, J. (2019) Silvopasture: A sustainable livestock production system. Agroforestry Systems, 93, 1–9.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Jørgensen, S.L., Termansen, M. & Pascual, U. (2020) Natural insurance as condition for market insurance: Climate change adaptation in agriculture. Ecological Economics, 169, 106489.
- Kadigi, R.M. & Mlasi, T.M. (2013) Payment for ecosystem Services of the Uluguru Watershed in Tanzania: Are the buyers willing to pay and sellers willing to accept compensation for their custodianship. Journal of Environmental Conservation Research, 1, 67.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kanchanaroek, Y. & Aslam, U. (2018) Policy schemes for the transition to sustainable agriculture—farmer preferences and spatial heterogeneity in northern Thailand. Land Use Policy, 78, 227–235.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kassahun, H.T. & Jacobsen, J.B. (2015) Economic and institutional incentives for managing the Ethiopian highlands of the upper Blue Nile Basin: A latent class analysis. Land Use Policy, 44, 76–89.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kassahun, H.T., Thorsen, B.J., Swait, J. & Jacobsen, J.B. (2020) Social cooperation in the context of integrated private and common land management. Environmental and Resource Economics, 75, 105–136.
- Khanal, U., Wilson, C., Lee, B. & Hoang, V.N. (2018) Smallholder farmers' participation in climate change adaptation programmes: Understanding preferences in Nepal. Climate Policy, 18(7), 916–927.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kisaka, L. & Obi, A. (2015) Farmers' preferences for management options as payment for environmental services scheme. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 18(1030–2016‐83048), 171–192.
Kreye, M.M., Pienaar, E.F., Soto, J.R. & Adams, D.C. (2017) Creating voluntary payment programs: Effective program design and ranchers' willingness to conserve Florida panther habitat. Land Economics, 93(3), 459–480.
- Kuhfuss, L., Préget, R., Thoyer, S. & Hanley, N. (2016) Nudging farmers to enrol land into Agri‐environmental schemes: The role of a collective bonus. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 43(4), 609–636.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kuhfuss, L., Préget, R., Thoyer, S., Hanley, N., Le Coent, P. & Désolé, M. (2016) Nudges, social norms, and permanence in agri‐environmental schemes. Land Economics, 92(4), 641–655.
Lancaster, K.J. (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157.
Lapierre, M., Le Velly, G., Bougherara, D., Préget, R. & Sauquet, A. (2023) Designing agri‐environmental schemes to cope with uncertainty. Ecological Economics, 203, 107610. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107610.
Latacz‐Lohmann, U. & Breustedt, G. (2019) Using choice experiments to improve the design of agri‐environmental schemes. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 495–528.
Le Coent, P., Préget, R. & Thoyer, S. (2017) Compensating environmental losses versus creating environmental gains: Implications for biodiversity offsets. Ecological Economics, 142, 120–129.
Lefebvre, M., Barreiro‐Hurlé, J., Blanchflower, C., Colen, L., Kuhfuss, L., Rommel, J. et al. (2021) Can economic experiments contribute to a more effective CAP? EuroChoices, 20(3), 42–49.
Li, H., Bennett, M.T., Jiang, X., Zhang, K. & Yang, X. (2017) Rural household preferences for active participation in “payment for ecosystem service” programs: A case in the miyun reservoir catchment, China. PLoS ONE, 12(1), e0169483.
- Lienhoop, N. & Brouwer, R. (2015) Agri‐environmental policy valuation: Farmers' contract design preferences for afforestation schemes. Land Use Policy, 42, 568–577.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lienhoop, N. & Schröter‐Schlaack, C. (2018) Involving multiple actors in ecosystem service governance: Exploring the role of stated preference valuation. Ecosystem Services, 34, 181–188.
Lizin, S., Van Passel, S. & Schreurs, E. (2015) Farmers' perceived cost of land use restrictions: A simulated purchasing decision using discrete choice experiments. Land Use Policy, 46, 115–124.
Lliso, B., Pascual, U., Engel, S. & Mariel, P. (2020) Payments for ecosystem services or collective stewardship of mother earth? Applying deliberative valuation in an indigenous community in Colombia. Ecological Economics, 169, 106499.
- Loft, L., Gehrig, S., Salk, C. & Rommel, J. (2020) Fair payments for effective environmental conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(25), 14094–14101.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Luoto, M., Rekolainen, S., Aakkula, J. & Pykälä, J. (2003) Loss of plant species richness and habitat connectivity in grasslands associated with agricultural change in Finland. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 32(7), 447–452.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mamine, F. & Minviel, J.J. (2020) Contract design for adoption of agrienvironmental practices: A meta‐analysis of discrete choice experiments. Ecological Economics, 176, 106721.
Mariel, P. & Meyerhoff, J. (2018) A more flexible model or simply more effort? On the use of correlated random parameters in applied choice studies. Ecological Economics, 154, 419–429.
- Matzdorf, B. & Lorenz, J. (2010) How cost‐effective are result‐oriented Agri‐environmental measures?—An empirical analysis in Germany. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 535–544.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Matzdorf, B., Biedermann, C., Meyer, C., Nicolaus, K., Sattler, C. & Schomers, S. (2014) Paying for green. Payments for Ecosystem Services in Practice. Successful examples of PES from Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States. Müncheberg, p. 208.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
McFadden, D. (1974) The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3(4), 303–328.
- McGuire, J.M., Morton, L.W., Arbuckle, J.G. & Cast, A.D. (2015) Farmer identities and responses to the social–biophysical environment. Journal of Rural Studies, 39, 145–155. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.011.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mettepenningen, E., Vandermeulen, V., Delaet, K., Van Huylenbroeck, G. & Wailes, E.J. (2013) Investigating the influence of the institutional organisation of agri‐environmental schemes on scheme adoption. Land Use Policy, 33, 20–30.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Mosquera‐Losada, M.R., Santiago‐Freijanes, J.J., Rois‐Díaz, M., Moreno, G., den Herder, M., Aldrey‐Vázquez, J.A. et al. (2018) Agroforestry in Europe: A land management policy tool to combat climate change. Land Use Policy, 78, 603–613.
Narjes, M.E. & Lippert, C. (2016) Longan fruit farmers' demand for policies aimed at conserving native pollinating bees in northern Thailand. Ecosystem Services, 18, 58–67.
Neves do Prado, L. & Abildtrup, J. (2022) Landowners’ willingness to accept pesticide reduction in the Pipiripau River Basin (Brazil). Environmental Challenges, 9, 100607. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100607.
- Niskanen, O., Tienhaara, A., Haltia, E. & Pouta, E. (2021) Farmers' heterogeneous preferences towards results‐based environmental policies. Land Use Policy, 102, 105227.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Nthambi, M., Markova‐Nenova, N. & Wätzold, F. (2021) Quantifying loss of benefits from poor governance of climate change adaptation projects: A discrete choice experiment with farmers in Kenya. Ecological Economics, 179, 106831.
- OECD. (2022) Making Agri‐environmental payments more cost effective. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Olivieri, M., Andreoli, M., Vergamini, D. & Bartolini, F. (2021) Innovative contract solutions for the provision of agri‐environmental climatic public goods: A literature review. Sustainability, 13(12), 6936.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ortega, D.L., Waldman, K.B., Richardson, R.B., Clay, D.C. & Snapp, S. (2016) Sustainable intensification and farmer preferences for crop system attributes: Evidence from Malawi's central and southern regions. World Development, 87, 139–151.
- Palm‐Forster, L.H. & Messer, K.D. (2021) Experimental and behavioral economics to inform agri‐environmental programs and policies. In: Handbook of agricultural economics, Vol. 5. Elsevier, pp. 4331–4406.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Petrolia, D.R., Guignet, D., Whitehead, J., Kent, C., Caulder, C. & Amon, K. (2021) Nonmarket valuation in the Environmental Protection Agency's regulatory process. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(3), 952–969.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Petsakos, A., Ciaian, P., Espinosa, M., Perni, A. & Kremmydas, D. (2022) Farm‐level impacts of the CAP post‐2020 reform: A scenario‐based analysis. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 45, 1168–1188.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Pröbstl‐Haider, U., Mostegl, N.M., Kelemen‐Finan, J., Haider, W., Formayer, H., Kantelhardt, J. et al. (2016) Farmers' preferences for future agricultural land use under the consideration of climate change. Environmental Management, 58, 446–464.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Raes, L., Speelman, S. & Aguirre, N. (2017) Farmers' preferences for PES contracts to adopt silvopastoral systems in southern Ecuador, revealed through a choice experiment. Environmental Management, 60, 200–215.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rakotonarivo, O.S., Jacobsen, J.B., Larsen, H.O., Jones, J.P.G., Nielsen, M.R., Ramamonjisoa, B.S. et al. (2017) Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence on the True Local Welfare Costs of Forest Conservation in Madagascar: Are Discrete Choice Experiments a Valid ex ante Tool? World Development, 94, 478–491. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.009.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rocchi, L., Paolotti, L. & Fagioli, F.F. (2017) Defining agri‐environmental schemes in the buffer areas of a natural regional park: An application of choice experiment using the latent class approach. Land Use Policy, 66, 141–150. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.033.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Rommel, J., Schulze, C., Matzdorf, B., Sagebiel, J. & Wechner, V. (2022) Learning about German farmers’ willingness to cooperate from public goods games and expert predictions. Q Open, 3(3), qoac023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoac023.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rose, J.M. & Bliemer, M.C. (2013) Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments. Transportation, 40, 1021–1041.
- Runge, T., Latacz‐Lohmann, U., Schaller, L., Todorova, K., Daugbjerg, C., Termansen, M. et al. (2022) Implementation of eco‐schemes in fifteen European Union member states. EuroChoices, 21(2), 19–27.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ruto, E. & Garrod, G. (2009) Investigating farmers' preferences for the design of Agri‐environment schemes: A choice experiment approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(5), 631–647.
- Salazar‐Ordóñez, M., Rodríguez‐Entrena, M. & Villanueva, A.J. (2021) Exploring the commodification of biodiversity using olive oil producers' willingness to accept. Land Use Policy, 107, 104348. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104348.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sangkapitux, C., Neef, A., Polkongkaew, W., Pramoon, N., Nonkiti, S. & Nanthasen, K. (2009) Willingness of upstream and downstream resource managers to engage in compensation schemes for environmental services. International Journal of the Commons, 3(1), 41–63.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Santos, R., Clemente, P., Brouwer, R., Antunes, P. & Pinto, R. (2015) Landowner preferences for agri‐environmental agreements to conserve the montado ecosystem in Portugal. Ecological Economics, 118, 159–167.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sardaro, R., Girone, S., Acciani, C., Bozzo, F., Petrontino, A. & Fucilli, V. (2016) Agro‐biodiversity of Mediterranean crops: farmers' preferences in support of a conservation programme for olive landraces. Biological Conservation, 201, 210–219. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.033.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sattler, C., Barghusen, R., Bredemeier, B., Dutilly, C. & Prager, K. (2023) Institutional analysis of actors involved in the governance of innovative contracts for agri‐environmental and climate schemes. Global Environmental Change, 80, 102668.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schaafsma, M., Ferrini, S. & Turner, R.K. (2019) Assessing smallholder preferences for incentivised climate‐smart agriculture using a discrete choice experiment. Land Use Policy, 88, 104153.
Schaub, S., Ghazoul, J., Huber, R., Zhang, W., Sander, A., Rees, C. et al. (2023) The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' participation in voluntary Agri‐environmental schemes: A systematic review. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74, 617–660.
- Schoeneberger, M., Bentrup, G., De Gooijer, H., Soolanayakanahally, R., Sauer, T., Brandle, J. et al. (2012) Branching out: Agroforestry as a climate change mitigation and adaptation tool for agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 67(5), 128A–136A.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schomers, S., Sattler, C. & Matzdorf, B. (2015) An analytical framework for assessing the potential of intermediaries to improve the performance of payments for ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 42, 58–70.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Schulz, N., Breustedt, G. & Latacz‐Lohmann, U. (2014) Assessing farmers' willingness to accept “greening”: Insights from a discrete choice experiment in Germany. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(1), 26–48.
Sheremet, O., Ruokamo, E., Juutinen, A., Svento, R. & Hanley, N. (2018) Incentivising participation and spatial coordination in payment for ecosystem service schemes: Forest disease control programs in Finland. Ecological Economics, 152, 260–272.
Shittu, A.M., Kehinde, M.O., Ogunnaike, M.G. & Oyawole, F.P. (2018) Effects of land tenure and property rights on farm households' willingness to accept incentives to invest in measures to combat land degradation in Nigeria. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 47(2), 357–387.
- Sidemo‐Holm, W., Smith, H.G. & Brady, M.V. (2018) Improving agricultural pollution abatement through result‐based payment schemes. Land Use Policy, 77, 209–219.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Siebert, R., Toogood, M. & Knierim, A. (2006) Factors affecting European farmers' participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(4), 318–340.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Silberg, T.R., Richardson, R.B. & Lopez, M.C. (2020) Maize farmer preferences for intercropping systems to reduce striga in Malawi. Food Security, 12, 269–283.
- Socci, P., Errico, A., Castelli, G., Penna, D. & Preti, F. (2019) Terracing: From agriculture to multiple ecosystem services. In: Socci, P., Errico, A., Castelli, G., Penna, D. & Preti, F. (Eds.) Oxford research encyclopedia of environmental science. Oxford University Press USA.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Sorice, M.G., Haider, W., Conner, J.R. & Ditton, R.B. (2011) Incentive structure of and private landowner participation in an endangered species conservation program. Conservation Biology, 25(3), 587–596.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Šumrada, T., Japelj, A., Verbič, M. & Erjavec, E. (2022) Farmers' preferences for result‐based schemes for grassland conservation in Slovenia. Journal for Nature Conservation, 66, 126143.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tanaka, K., Hanley, N. & Kuhfuss, L. (2022) Farmers' preferences towards an outcome‐based payment for ecosystem service scheme in Japan. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(3), 720–738.
Tarfasa, S., Balana, B.B., Tefera, T., Woldeamanuel, T., Moges, A., Dinato, M. et al. (2018) Modelling smallholder farmers' preferences for soil management measures: A case study from South Ethiopia. Ecological Economics, 145, 410–419.
Tesfaye, A. & Brouwer, R. (2012) Testing participation constraints in contract design for sustainable soil conservation in Ethiopia. Ecological Economics, 73, 168–178.
Thiermann, I., Silvius, B., Splinter, M. & Dries, L. (2023) Making bird numbers count: Would Dutch farmers accept a result‐based meadow bird conservation scheme? Ecological Economics, 214, 107999.
- Thompson, B., Leduc, G., Manevska‐Tasevska, G., Toma, L. & Hansson, H. (2023) Farmers' adoption of ecological practices: a systematic literature map. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 00, 1–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477‐9552.12545.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Thoyer, S. & Préget, R. (2019) Enriching the CAP evaluation toolbox with experimental approaches: Introduction to the special issue. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 347–366.
Torres, A.B., MacMillan, D.C., Skutsch, M. & Lovett, J.C. (2013) Payments for ecosystem services and rural development: Landowners' preferences and potential participation in western Mexico. Ecosystem Services, 6, 72–81.
- Trenholm, R., Haider, W., Lantz, V., Knowler, D. & Haegeli, P. (2017) Landowner preferences for wetlands conservation programs in two southern Ontario watersheds. Journal of Environmental Management, 200, 6–21.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Tyllianakis, E. & Martin‐Ortega, J. (2021) Agri‐environmental schemes for biodiversity and environmental protection: How we are not yet “hitting the right keys”. Land Use Policy, 109, 105620.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tyllianakis, E., Martin‐Ortega, J., Ziv, G., Chapman, P.J., Holden, J., Cardwell, M. et al. (2023) A window into land managers’ preferences for new forms of agri‐environmental schemes: evidence from a post‐Brexit analysis. Land Use Policy, 129, 106627. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106627.
Vaissière, A.C., Tardieu, L., Quétier, F. & Roussel, S. (2018) Preferences for biodiversity offset contracts on arable land: A choice experiment study with farmers. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 45(4), 553–582.
- Van den Broeck, G., Vlaeminck, P., Raymaekers, K., Velde, K.V., Vranken, L. & Maertens, M. (2017) Rice farmers' preferences for fairtrade contracting in Benin: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 846–854.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Van Putten, vI., Jennings, S.M., Louviere, J.J. & Burgess, L.B. (2011) Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: A latent class approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(10), 2647–2656.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Vidogbéna, F., Adégbidi, A., Tossou, R., Assogba‐Komlan, F., Ngouajio, M., Martin, T. et al. (2015) Control of vegetable pests in Benin–Farmers' preferences for eco‐friendly nets as an alternative to insecticides. Journal of Environmental Management, 147, 95–107.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Villamayor‐Tomas, S., Sagebiel, J. & Olschewski, R. (2019) Bringing the neighbours in: A choice experiment on the influence of coordination and social norms on farmers' willingness to accept agro‐environmental schemes across Europe. Land Use Policy, 84, 200–215.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Villanueva, A.J., Glenk, K. & Rodríguez‐Entrena, M. (2017) Protest responses and willingness to accept: ecosystem services providers' preferences towards incentive‐based schemes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(3), 801–821. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477‐9552.12211.
- Villanueva, A.J., Gómez‐Limón, J.A., Arriaza, M. & Rodríguez‐Entrena, M. (2015) The design of Agri‐environmental schemes: Farmers' preferences in southern Spain. Land Use Policy, 46, 142–154.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Vorlaufer, T., Falk, T., Dufhues, T. & Kirk, M. (2017) Payments for ecosystem services and agricultural intensification: Evidence from a choice experiment on deforestation in Zambia. Ecological Economics, 141, 95–105.
- Wachenheim, C., Roberts, D.C., Dhingra, N., Lesch, W. & Devney, J. (2018) Conservation reserve program enrolment decisions in the prairie pothole region. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 73(3), 337–352.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wachenheim, C.J., Roberts, D.C., Addo, N.S. & Devney, J. (2018) Farmer preferences for a working wetlands program. Wetlands, 38, 1005–1015.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Waldman, K.B. & Richardson, R.B. (2018) Confronting tradeoffs between agricultural ecosystem services and adaptation to climate change in Mali. Ecological Economics, 150, 184–193. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.003.
Waldman, K.B., Ortega, D.L., Richardson, R.B. & Snapp, S.S. (2017) Estimating demand for perennial pigeon pea in Malawi using choice experiments. Ecological Economics, 131, 222–230.
- Ward, P.S., Bell, A.R., Parkhurst, G.M., Droppelmann, K. & Mapemba, L. (2016) Heterogeneous preferences and the effects of incentives in promoting conservation agriculture in Malawi. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 222, 67–79.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Westerink, J., Jongeneel, R., Polman, N., Prager, K., Franks, J., Dupraz, P. et al. (2017) Collaborative governance arrangements to deliver spatially coordinated agri‐environmental management. Land Use Policy, 69, 176–192.
White, B. & Hanley, N. (2016) Should we pay for ecosystem service outputs, inputs or both? Environmental and Resource Economics, 63, 765–787.
- Williamson, S., Ball, A. & Pretty, J. (2008) Trends in pesticide use and drivers for safer pest management in four African countries. Crop Protection, 27(10), 1327–1334.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wilson, G.A. & Hart, K. (2001) Farmer participation in agri‐environmental schemes: Towards conservation‐oriented thinking? Sociologia Ruralis, 41(2), 254–274.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wuepper, D. & Huber, R. (2022) Comparing effectiveness and return on investment of action‐and results‐based agri‐environmental payments in Switzerland. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 104(5), 1585–1604.
- Yeboah, F.K., Lupi, F. & Kaplowitz, M.D. (2015) Agricultural landowners' willingness to participate in a filter strip program for watershed protection. Land Use Policy, 49, 75–85.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Zandersen, M., Jørgensen, S.L., Nainggolan, D., Gyldenkærne, S., Winding, A., Greve, M.H. et al. (2016) Potential and economic efficiency of using reduced tillage to mitigate climate effects in Danish agriculture. Ecological Economics, 123, 14–22.
- Zemo, K.H. & Termansen, M. (2021) Environmental identity economics: An application to farmers’ pro‐environmental investment behaviour. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 49(2), 331–358. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbab049.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now